Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

The Harsh Uncertainty of the Vanguard

In a recent post at Alt of Center, Starkian blogger Matt P. concedes a “basic ambivalence […] about all of this blogging, political edge-o-sphere stuff”:

Are we highly intelligent critics of society whose ideas can ultimately ameliorate it, and promote civilizational flourishing? Or are we just a bunch of men and boys who cannot find the status we crave in real life and so take to the internet to seek it out? addicts going again and again to a well of insubstantial narcissistic supply, entering virtual spaces in which we, and our ideas, are afforded more power, and dreaming up real worlds in which we could be afforded same. The conclusion I have reached […] is that we are not intrinsically one thing or the other – that for now we could be described in either way, and that what we ultimately will be has not yet been revealed.

History is written by the victors […] If we win, we will have always been intrepid ideological and cultural travelers to a new promised land. If we lose, then it’s all just been a maladaptive daydream – a power fantasy – and we really were just sad boys jerking off to hentai in our basements the whole time. It’s a harsh uncertainty that I bet even Richard Spencer grapples with from time to time. […]

Perhaps it goes without saying that those who feel compelled to dream up alternative futures are by default not the most “well-adjusted” members of society, but is this in any way a negation of the value of their thought? I think not. Because after all we have to consider: what is it that is prevents certain people from adjusting to the status quo in the first place? And when these people form a mass, are they not the very motor of history?

The artists cathects his frustrated desires into his work and creates a beauty which rides the back of destruction, and transcends the pain and muck of his battered ego, becoming like the most beautiful products of nature itself: concretely existing entities, flowers of the tumultuous process of evolution, aesthetic guide-stones in this chaotic reality.

To the “harsh uncertainty” of the internet nationalist I would counterpose the optimistic vanguardism of Jonathan Bowden. “This is a very difficult topic to speak about because it appears to be a depressing and pessimistic era where most of the storm and stress and most of the Zeitgeist, or spirit of the age, seems to be against us,” Bowden admitted at the outset of a speech he delivered in 2011.

Bowden

Jonathan Bowden

There’s also a preponderance for people on the Right politically to have metaphysically conservative views, which means they’re often pessimistic; they’re often loyal to Spengler’s idea in the 1920s and 1930s that “optimism is a form of cowardice” and in relation to that sort of idea the notion that one should be optimistic about the future is difficult to sustain. […]

There are more of us than ever before, but it’s always a question of quality as against quantity in this life, because what I am going to propose is that instead of looking at demographic and quantity-based analyses, quantitative ways of looking at things, let’s look at qualitative ways of looking at things. Let’s look at quality. Let’s look at elitism. Let’s look at the fact that all groups need a vanguard.

All elites and vanguard minorities are is the radical consciousness of their own group. Just as people like Louis Farrakhan […] are in some respects totally unrepresentative of a lot of African-American opinion, they nevertheless represent an ultimate redoubt, an ultimate salient, or a bridgehead from which their population can go forth and from which it can gain energy and succor and that’s the way you have to look at these things.

People need ultimate resources. They need absolutists, and they need semi-fundamentalists who will stand up for them at least in a conceptual way. Even if they can’t stand up for themselves, don’t want to, or wouldn’t even know how to. The point of radicals, particularly radicals who deal with the politics of identity in any shape or form, is to provide that elite, is to provide that vanguard. […]

Just because most of the politics of this era seems to running well and truly against us does not mean that the situation is hopeless, because situations are never hopeless. Groups that have been done down or perceive that they’ve been done down by history have undergone worse traumas than we are undergoing at the present time.

The danger of the ideology of the victim, which I don’t really subscribe to except as a tactic on occasion, is that you begin to think like a victim, and you begin to act like a victim. Many of our people now are almost asking for a whipping, asking for a collective beating, asking to be forgiven for the past, asking to be forgiven for sins and crimes of the past which they never committed, which they’re hardly aware of, which can be reconstrued as episodes of heroic cruelty or glorious vanguardism that don’t even need to be apologized for in the past or in the present.

There’s a degree to which I personally think that the doctrine of vanguardism is the way out of the dilemma that we face. All Communist movements believe that the proletariat needed to be saved from itself. They believe that the masses were degraded by feudalism and by capitalism. They believe that only an elite or a vanguard party could raise the masses up to socialism as the inverse of the capitalism they wish to replace. All Communist movements that flourished in Western and other societies throughout most of the late 19th and 20th centuries based themselves upon the vanguard principle. These movements were tiny.

Bowden goes on to draw particular inspiration from the Bolsheviks, whose split with the Mensheviks occurred at the Second Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party in London:

The majority of Londoners even from the ethnic groups that a significant proportion of those Communists were drawn from would regard all that as idiocy and lunacy just as the bulk of White people today regard a significant amount of what we say as lunacy.

All people who have a vanguard, an elitist mentality, are regarded as partly mad by their own groups, because the majority of people do not want to know. The majority of people wish to live their own life in their own way, and they only look at these broader questions when life impinges upon them and comes upon them, and the hand of life grasps them by the collar and they really cannot do any other thing but notice what is in front of them. […]

They’re beginning to realize what it is like to be a minority or what it is like to be culturally disprivileged or what it is like to be dispossessed in a way.

That spirit will grow, but it will only feed into consciousness in a number of select minds, because the bulk of people are not drawn to be in a vanguard formulation. People will only listen to a vanguard when they are desperate. They will only listen to a vanguard when they think there is no other hope.

The task of the vanguard, then, is to work in the hope of hopelessness – so that the radical proposition appears not only more attractive, but absolutely necessary.

Rainer Chlodwig von K.

Rainer is the author of Protocols of the Elders of Zanuck: Psychological Warfare and Filth at the Movies – the DEFINITIVE Alt-Right statement on Hollywood!

Advertisements

About icareviews

Author, Protocols of the Elders of Zanuck: Psychological Warfare and Filth at the Movies

42 comments on “The Harsh Uncertainty of the Vanguard

  1. icareviews
    July 27, 2018

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  2. Arch Stanton
    July 27, 2018

    My apologies for the unreadable format of the lengthy quotes. Had I known, I would not have used blockquotes.

    Here is the link to the full article about Major Thompson – https://www.voltairenet.org/IMG/pdf/Sutton_Wall_Street_and_the_bolshevik_revolution-5.pdf

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Arch Stanton
    July 27, 2018

    Moderator please remove the previous posting of this comment

    White goyim invariably overlook the most critical aspect behind the issues they are dealing with – money. There is speculation the Rothschilds now own or control 2/3 to 3/4 of the worlds’ wealth. Such numbers are not unreasonable, in light of the massive financial power the Rothschilds established and wielded over 19th century England, the superpower of its day, with their manipulation of the Napoleonic wars.

    Funding is where Jews start and goyim never begin. Money is, by far, the Jews’ greatest weapon against ignorant goyim. As a weapon, money can be used by Jewish overlords to giveth or taketh away. That is why Jews have taken control of the world’s financial systems. Money is the new god one cannot deny. The Ark of the Covenant was where ancient Jews kept their gold. This provides the explanation for their claim, “The army that had the Ark marching before it was invincible.”

    Note carefully the very first application for Jewish shekels in the following description.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ § ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    ‘All Communist movements that flourished in Western and other societies throughout most of the late 19th and 20th centuries based themselves upon the vanguard principle. These movements were tiny.

    ‘THOMPSON IN KERENSKY’S RUSSIA (1917)

    ‘What then was the Red Cross Mission doing? Thompson certainly acquired a reputation for opulent living in Petrograd, but apparently he undertook only two major projects in Kerensky’s Russia: support for an American propaganda program and support for the Russian Liberty Loan. Soon after arriving in Russia, Thompson met with Madame Breshko-Breshkovskaya and David Soskice, Kerensky’s secretary, and agreed to contribute $2 million to a committee of popular education so that it could “have its own press and… engage a staff of lecturers, with cinematograph illustrations” (861.00/ 1032); this was for the propaganda purpose of urging Russia to continue in the war against Germany. According to Soskice, “a packet of 50,000 rubles” was given to Breshko-Breshkovskaya with the statement,

    “This is for you to expend according to your best judgment.” A further 2,100,000 rubles was deposited into a current bank account. A letter from J. P. Morgan to the State Department (861.51/190) confirms that Morgan cabled 425,000 rubles to Thompson at his request for the Russian Liberty Loan; J. P. also conveyed the interest of the Morgan firm regarding “the wisdom of making an individual subscription through Mr. Thompson” to the Russian Liberty Loan. These sums were transmitted through the National City Bank branch in Petrograd.

    ‘THOMPSON GIVES THE BOLSHEVIKS $1 MILLION Of greater historical significance, however, was the assistance given to the Bolsheviks first by Thompson, then, after December 4, 1917, by Raymond Robins. Thompson’s contribution to the Bolshevik cause was recorded in the contemporary American press. The Washington Post of February 2, 1918, carried the following paragraphs:

    THOMPSON GIVES BOLSHEVIKI A MILLION

    W. B. Thompson, Red Cross Donor, Believes Party Misrepresented.

    New York, Feb. 2, 1918.

    ‘William B. Thompson, who was in Petrograd from July until November last, has made a personal contribution of $1,000,000 to the Bolsheviki for the purpose of spreading their doctrine in Germany and Austria.

    ‘Mr. Thompson had an opportunity to study Russian conditions as head of the American Red Cross Mission, expenses of which also were largely defrayed by his personal contributions. He believes that the Bolsheviki constitute the greatest power against Pro-Germanism in Russia and that their propaganda has been undermining the militarist regimes of the General Empires.

    ‘Mr. Thompson deprecates American criticism of the Bolsheviki. He believes they have been misrepresented and has made the financial contribution to the cause in the belief that it will be money well spent for the future of Russia as well as for the Allied cause.’

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ § ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Morehere

    Surprise! Communist success was due to lavish Jewish funding.

    Obviously, Thompson was a Rothschild “bag-man,” while J.P. Morgan was one of the financial fronts hiding Rothschild influence. By the beginning of the twentieth century, J.P. Morgan was moving billions ~ BILLIONS ~ of dollars around the globe. Yet, when he died, his estate was valued at a paltry $60 million, giving rise to the question of that day, “Where did all the money go?” The money was never Morgans, it was Rothschild money he was well paid to move.

    Hitler had to remove Jews from the halls of financial power they held in Germany before he could make any meaningful political gains. This left Germany devoid of gold reserves and utterly bankrupt by the standards of the day. To counter this problem, Hitler had to issue promissory notes for payment based on German labor.

    Noting his success, Jews copied his plan after the war, removing America from its functional gold and silver standards, making these once “precious metals” just another floating-value, Jewish commodity. Considering America’s moribund manufacturing and industrial base, it would be impossible for a new Hitler, like say Trump, to copy the former’s success. No doubt, that is the major reason Jews made the change to America’s economic foundation.

    It is interesting to find rising hubbub in the media about Trump restoring America’s industrial and manufacturing base. This is yet another Jewish red herring to Band-aid over the gullible goyims’ rising awareness of their critical economic situation and horrendous lack of real, wealth producing, American jobs.

    Jews love their cosmopolitan, global markets that allow them to manipulate the economic disparity between countries as middlemen making huge financial gains, while assuring critical, imported goods, like food and advanced technology, can be fully controlled. This is why there is no possible way Jews are going to allow Trump’s fine sounding “MAGA” program to succeed. But then Trump is merely another Rothschild whore to be raped to death and cut up into pieces so they can be sent to all the other tribes of Israel.

    The financially and morally bankrupt white goyim, those outside Rothschild financial control, are finished. They can no longer fund a corner lemonade stand, let alone fund a meaningful movement against the Jews’ massive economic and political control. Hell, most of them cannot even fund their own websites!

    Like

    • icareviews
      July 27, 2018

      Those who despair are certainly finished.

      Like

      • Arch Stanton
        July 27, 2018

        There is no “despair” in such facts. It is simply the way things are these days, and have been for the last several hundred years.

        All the emotional tags, e.g. hate, anger, despair, good, bad, evil, positive, negative (non physical connotations) like, dislike, are all subjective viewpoints, invariably derived from preconceptions having nothing to with the reality to which they are applied. The destruction a goy might well despair over, will be rejoiced over by Jews. Goyim typically view criminality as “bad” or “evil,” while Jews regard the same criminality as a paragon of “good” culture.

        There is no “good” or “evil” outside man’s mind. That is why such terms are only applied to the human condition. Yes, I know, there are some who maintain various animals and object are “evil,” but again, this is only man’s perception projected onto animals and objects.

        Some people say “Jews are evil,” but how do Jews view the situation? Considering their concept of “Tikkun Olam,” obviously Jews view themselves as a light unto the world, performing their destructive “good” for mankind. This is a classic case of human perspective framing the ideas of good and evil, as it does in all cases.

        If these concepts had any basis in reality, then one would find them applicable throughout the universe; as for instance, the cyclical nature of the universe. Cycles can be observed in every, single, aspect of nature.

        From the tiniest particle, to the largest celestial body, cycles are universal. Can the same be said about man’s emotional terminology? Outside a Jews’ Hollywood movie or comic book, when have you heard of a planet being referred to as “evil”?

        Like

      • icareviews
        July 27, 2018

        First you inform the readers of this site that they’re “finished”. Now you’re saying everything is cyclical. If everything is cyclical, how are we “finished”? Does your mentally ill rambling even have a point apart from impressing yourself?

        Like

      • Arch Stanton
        July 27, 2018

        I believe you wrote “Those who despair are certainly finished,” not I.

        Like

    • bob saffron
      July 27, 2018

      Hitler spent his country’s gold reserves in his make-work economic “miracle” and rearmament. Defining this as success expunges failure from the dictionary.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        July 28, 2018

        @bob saffron

        Gold is a barbarous relic – it’s a mostly useless metal aside from being pretty and being second rate for some electronics. Digging up gold from a hole in the ground, then digging another hole in the ground and putting the gold in it?

        Talk about “make work!” Totally useless.

        But Arabs like gold and gladly trade their useful product – oil – for gold. So, there’s that.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 28, 2018

        A barbarous relic that costs upwards of $1,200oz and that has served as a means of exchange and store of value for millennia, including the reserves supposedly held by the Federal Reserve at Fort Knox. The whole point is that digging up gold is much harder than printing up dollars. How much purchasing power has the USD lost over the last century?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        July 29, 2018

        @bob saffron

        The whole point is that digging up gold is much harder than printing up dollars

        So is finding prime factors of very large numbers and running bitcoin proof of work algorithms.

        In other words – make work. Digging holes and filling them up again you get shiny metals or interesting numbers.

        If your goal is to limit dollars, digging holes and arithmetic work just as well. Certainly there’s no hyperinflation in sight, and one dollar can buy things that didn’t even exist a hundred years ago so depending on how you define it a dollar has gained purchasing power.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        July 28, 2018

        It’s OK for individual Arabs to like gold, but when Gaddafi mooted a gold dinar he signed his own death warrant. Apparently not a relic to the USD crowd.
        https://www.globalresearch.ca/hillary-emails-reveal-nato-killed-gaddafi-to-stop-libyan-creation-of-gold-backed-currency/5594742

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        July 28, 2018

        Regarding LIbya, the USD crowd would have been indirectly threatened though the pricing of crude in dinars; the € crowd by reduced demand for CFA franc.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 29, 2018

        https://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2010/nov/24/virginia-tea-party-patriots/virginia-tea-party-says-dollar-has-lost-98-percent/

        Were it not for inflation the lower prices for technology we observe would be even more spectacular.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        July 29, 2018

        @bob saffron

        would be

        Show me a double blind study with a proper control group and maybe I’ll believe you.

        Come to think of it, if not for inflation we’d all be making ten cents an hour too…

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 29, 2018

        I define inflation as the money supply growth. I don’t think Bitcoin will become a money, ie. the generally-accepted means of exchange. Monies always have some non-monetary value (salt, pelts, oxen, gold, liquor, etc..). Bitcoin has none.

        That nexus between monetary/non-monetary value is broken by non-convertibility. So far, the ocean of money created has swelled financial assets and not commodities. Things change.

        Irredeemable paper monies have always failed and I don’t see why this experiment should be any different, except in scale. Stockpile your beaver pelts and bourbon while you can!

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        July 29, 2018

        I define inflation as the money supply growth

        Yes, everyone reading understands Austrian ideology. Austrian idealogues make up their own definitions for many economic concepts.

        I don’t believe in Austrian ideology myself, it’s a fringe ideology from the 19th century.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 29, 2018

        We can’t freeze all variables bar one to do experiments. It’s not a laboratory scenario with reproducibility. But you’ll find it difficult to find anyone who thinks the *general* cost of living has gone down in dollar terms over the century.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        July 29, 2018

        you’ll find it difficult to find anyone who thinks the *general* cost of living has gone down in dollar terms over the century.

        you’ll find it difficult to find anyone who thinks wages have gone down in dollar terms over the century.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 30, 2018

        Real wages haven’t increased since the seventies. Nominal wages, sure, that’s what inflation does.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 30, 2018

        10 cents an hour might be fine if my overall living expenses amounted to one dollar a week. What’s more, if the money supply were relatively stable, I could plan better, confident that outgoings and income would remain more predictable.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        July 30, 2018

        If I get paid $1,000 an hour than higher living expenses don’t seem so bad!

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 30, 2018

        As regards inflation, the Fed uses indices that exclude house prices and financial assets. Cost-of-living indices are necessarily arbitrary, but those exclusions are significant.

        Like

      • Arch Stanton
        July 30, 2018

        How many remember the “GNP” standard?

        The move from the GNP (Gross National Product) to GDP (Gross Domestic Product) was a great leap forward towards manipulating Americas true economic numbers.

        GNP was a real measure of real wealth production, so these numbers had to go. When Jews began dismantling Americas’ the industrial and manufacturing base, the numbers began reflecting the dismantling and destruction of Americas’ wealth production .

        Like the largely hidden dollar inflation, (People say “Prices are going up!” When in fact this is a result of money losing its value) the GDP allowed Jews to inflate phony economic numbers to keep the gullible goyim asleep. After the switch to GDP, economic numbers were inflated favorably to a point nobody noticed America no longer produced anything of real value in any significant quantity.

        The Jews’ economic palliative was the new “service sector” economy that included non-wealth producing income that simply showed internal money movement, where Americans would sell their our technical prowess to foreigners, along with selling each other hamburgers and shining each other’s shoes. What nobody seemed to realize is that an idea once can only be sold once.

        Jews have eviscerated America’s industrial and manufacturing base, selling off the majority portion to China at fire-sale prices. Today, with minority hiring being a high priority among employers, employment opportunities for the white male have narrowed considerably.

        Unless a white male is truly gifted in the sciences, where he might make substantial contributions to the Jews’ technological or weapons development programs, they are consigned to low paying “service industry” or a government jobs, like “Homeland Security’s” police or military. The disparity in pay and benefits between service sector jobs and the government, makes government jobs the obvious choice for most.

        Some people think economics is complex rocket science that will make one’s head explode, but when I had a commercial consrtreucion business intalelingbault doos and ban=k eqked in the banking business we had a saying, ” Keep it simple enough for a banker to understand it.

        I recommend reading G. Edward Griffin’s book, “The Creature from Jekyll Island”, the clearest, most concise explanation of what has happened to America’s once powerful economic might.

        Like

  4. Arch Stanton
    July 27, 2018

    It is to one’s grave detriment to allow these concepts to cloud their perception.

    Like

    • icareviews
      July 27, 2018

      Clouds or clear skies, you’re finished, Stanton! The Rothschilds are crushing you in their demonic blood-grip!

      Like

      • Arch Stanton
        July 27, 2018

        Question: Do you find my comments as emotionally laden as I find your responses?

        Like

      • icareviews
        July 27, 2018

        Sorry, can’t reply. My head just exploded from the Scanner-like intensity of your insights into metaphysics and fractional reserve banking.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 28, 2018

        One thing seems clear: revolutions are invariably ushered in by great bouts of money-printing which destroys the middle-class. Jacobin, Bolshevik, Nazi, Maoist, Pinochetista, etc..
        https://encyclopedia.1914-1918-online.net/article/war_finance_russian_empire

        Like

      • icareviews
        July 28, 2018

        Who would you appoint to head or end the Federal Reserve in the United States if you could have your say, Bob?

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 28, 2018

        When did I stop beating my wife?

        Without a Federal Reserve, the government’s ability to sell bonds would be seriously curtailed. That, along with enriching the banking cartel, is the whole point of the institution. So, no reform of note, nor disbandment. That’s revolutionary talk.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 28, 2018

        Frankly, until the money hegemon is slain, I can’t see how Main St. can win back its proper proportion with respect to Wall St..

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 28, 2018

        One thing I’m sure of, Yellen will be remembered fondly in time while her goy successor gets pilloried as rising interest rates/inflationary expectations pop the financial asset bubble. Sorry, Jerome, you’re “it”.

        Like

  5. bob saffron
    July 27, 2018

    富不过三代. Rothschilds and Soros are on a high right now, but things change. There is a long-term reversion-to-mean tendency with wealth. Jews may stay consistently wealthier than other groups, but individual fortunes rise and fall.
    https://easternhype.wordpress.com/2010/12/12/fu-bu-guo-san-dai-wealth-does-not-pass-three-generations/

    Like

  6. A. Vickstrom
    July 27, 2018

    How hopeless our battle is depends on two factors:

    1. Which nation are you trying to save?

    Very often Americans tend to project their nation’s strengths & weaknesses onto others and this only ends up causing confusion. Does the situation seem hopeless to Serb Nationalists? No, of course not. Their nation is 95% European (the rest are mostly gypos) and over 90% Serbian. Nignog culture has little influence there. Barring an unseen catastrophe they have decades to work out their problems.

    2. What is your end goal?

    My personal goal is to see England regain its former demographics and purge the anti-English class(es) amongst my people. That’s a difficult goal but easier than turning America into a racialist state simply because England is Whiter, much smaller, and lacks America’s material wealth (which makes an economic collapse much, much more likely).

    Do you want to turn back the clock and restore America’s 1950s era demographics? That’s going to be a bloody hard fight. Or do you want to eliminate affirmative action? That’s more feasible.

    Tell me what your goal is and I will tell you how feasible it is.

    Like

  7. bob saffron
    July 27, 2018

    Guns or butter, ineluctable choice.

    https://reason.com/archives/1999/08/01/nazi-economics

    Like

  8. Pingback: The Harsh Uncertainty of the Vanguard | Hipster Racist

  9. Arch Stanton
    July 30, 2018

    Some people think economics is complex rocket science that will make one’s head explode, but when I had a commercial construction business installing vault doors and bank equipment, we had a saying, ”Keep it simple enough for a banker to understand it.”

    Like

    • bob saffron
      July 30, 2018

      Economics has been mathematized to make it incomprehensible to the average man (lest he realize the skullduggery that passes for policy). Make it so arcane that Joe Sixpack dare not open his mouth in criticism.

      Like

  10. james
    July 31, 2018

    More necessary every day.

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: