Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

The Shallow State

Last week President Donald Trump met Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Finland, and the American media went crazy. After two solid years of attempting to convince Americans that Trump only won because Russia “hacked” the elections and that Donald Trump somehow “collaborated” with Putin in order to win, the media has only managed to convince the most far “left” of the Democratic party that is also convinced that Trump is Hitler and locks immigrant children in cages.

How seriously should we take the “outrage” of the mainstream media like the Washington Post?

Consider:

Josh Hader is the 24 year old Major League Baseball pitcher for the Milwaukee Brewers. Seven years ago, when he was 17 years old, Hader posted what were described as “homophobic” statements on Twitter. The media dug up these seven year old social media posts and found that he once tweeted “I hate gay people.” Major League Baseball condemned him, he was forced to apologize, and is now attending mandatory “sensitivity training.”

Abby Ohlheiser in the Washington Post actually quotes the Bible and suggests that the controversy over Hader’s twitter tweets is akin to God’s wrath for his “human sin.”

Democrats Discover the Bible

Mere weeks before, the same Washington Post created an animated cartoon of President Trump and Prime Minister Putin in a teenage homosexual romance, and of course puts Trump in the “bottom” position, clearly considered humiliating by the same people at the Washington Post who condemn Hader’s “homophobia.”

In Episode Two of “Trump Bites,” above, Mr. Trump’s not-so-secret admiration for President Vladimir Putin of Russia plays out in a teenager’s bedroom, where the fantasies of this forbidden romance come to life. — Trump and Putin: A Love Story

A third Washington Post editorial, by Meredith Loken, decries the “homophobia” of her own paper’s cartoon, but still finds a way to blame not the “liberal” Washington Post, or the Democratic party, but instead … the US military.

These depictions attack Trump’s desire to appear powerful and legitimate abroad by emasculating and reducing him to a purportedly “unmanly” act. The persistence of such narratives in a liberalizing climate of gay rights seems perplexing. However, they result in part from the ingrained expectations of a particular type of manhood in U.S. institutions. Specifically, we can trace them to hyper-masculinity in the military.

Military recruits and strategists undergo socializations that force them to reject femininity and adopt alpha, warrior mentalities. Men are expected to control emotions; take risks; display aggression, violence and physical toughness; and promote overt heterosexuality. These processes are often sexual. For example, in some military training, soldiers chant, “This is my rifle [holding up rifle], this is my gun [motioning to penis]; one’s for killing, the other’s for fun.”

One of the Trump’s team talking points is that Trump is opposed by “the Swamp,” synonymous with “Washington insiders” or “professional politicians” and in an update of the typical, decades old Republican party talking point, Trump is supposed to “drain the Swamp.”

But the smarter set among the “Right” has started to refer to the American “Deep State” that is supposedly against Trump. In this formulation, the CIA and the FBI are writing the script for the Washington Post and the New York Times, demonizing Trump and Putin, preventing Trump from making peace with Russia, or at the least, preventing war.

There is some truth to this formulation; certainly the CIA has long been not just “embedded” in the mainstream media, but virtually the core of the mainstream media. The Washington Post is always eager to defend the CIA and the “intelligence community.”

But there is nothing particularly “Deep” about this situation. As with all other institutions in society, the internet has changed the game. The Washington Post is just another website on the internet, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos’ personal blog. CIA “journalists” like Anderson Cooper of CNN aren’t even particularly covert anymore, and the days when a CIA agent like Richard Fuisz would “neither confirm nor deny” his “intelligence connections” – as recently as 2004, in fact – are long over. Now any pretty blonde woman with a State Department job will call herself @CIASpyGirl on Twitter the second her security clearance expires.

Old espionage hands that took their secrets to the grave haven’t survived the social media age.

The Washington Post or the Westboro Baptist Church?

There may be a “Deep State” the rules America from behind the curtain, and that “Deep State” may not be particularly fond of Donald Trump. But what we are seeing in these situations isn’t a “Deep State” at all – it’s a very, very “Shallow State.” FBI agents texting each other their contempt for Trump’s voters, former CIA heads calling the President “treasonous” in public, covered in media outlets once accepted as “respectable.”

There’s nothing “deep” or “hidden” or “covert” about any of this, it’s all out in the open. There is nothing profound about the media’s posturing on the morality of “homophobia” and immigration, and there’s nothing particularly interesting about partisan Democrats hating a Republican President – nor about the Republican establishment hating a President that is virtually the definition of “Republican in Name Only.”

It would be far more accurate to call it the “Shallow State.”

Advertisements

18 comments on “The Shallow State

  1. Pingback: The Shallow State | Hipster Racist

  2. Hazelshade
    July 19, 2018

    “The Washington Post is just another website on the internet”

    Dude, it’s worse than just another website. Meredith’s stretch from wapo cartoon —> masculinity in the military is more bewildering than anything I’ve read on a backwater blog in awhile. You’d think a billionaire like Jeff could hire better.

    Reminds me of trying to watch a linked CBS video awhile back. It was clogged with auto play ads that actually prevented a viewer from watching the linked video by snapping the scroll wheel away every ten seconds. My viewing device was relatively high powered, even. MSM, bro, you’re like one of the swollest media players ever…but do you even internet?

    Maybe this shallow clutter is a feature, not a bug for the swamp. It discouraged scrutiny. Indeed, it discourages viewing their websites at all! Thanks for dredging this stuff up—it’s a lot easier to read here.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      July 22, 2018

      @Hazelshade

      I’m more tech savvy than most so I always use ad blockers and such. Occasionally I’ll turn it off to see how the internet looks to nomal people and it’s awful. Who the hell would even want to go to these sites with auto-play videos blasting out of the speakers before the page loads and dozens of pop-ups? How can you even read an article?

      And other than reporting on the most basic and pedestrian of acknowledged facts is a neutral tone, most of the “serious journalism” from the Washington Post and the New York Times is just Democratic party fanaticism, paranoia, and snark.

      All they have is off the record access to various high level figures, other than that it’s pure propaganda. Trump is right to call it “fake news” because a lot of it is either false or utterly misleading.

      In theory I’m their target market – I used to buy newspapers daily and for years actually paid for an online subscriptions. But I’d be damned if I’d pay a dime for Jeff Bezos’ blog or to read Judith Miller’s Israeli propaganda about “Saddam’s WMDs.” Fake News.

      Who in their right mind would pay for blogs? If Jews expect me to read their bullshit they have to pay ME.

      Liked by 1 person

  3. Arch Stanton
    July 19, 2018

    Men are expected to control emotions; take risks; display aggression, violence and physical toughness; and promote overt heterosexuality. These processes are often sexual. For example, in some military training, soldiers chant, “This is my rifle [holding up rifle], this is my gun [motioning to penis]; one’s for killing, the other’s for fun.”

    “Some military training?” Like for sure dude, this is het up hyper, heterosexual military training.

    Bullshit!

    This was a punishment ritual for calling one’s weapon a “gun.” The recruit holds his crotch with one hand while holding his rifle with the other, chanting this ditty out loud to passerbys so he remembers what NOT to call his rifle. He might have a rifle, he might have a pistol, he might have a firearm, but the only “gun” he has was invented by a Jew and doesn’t even scare the enemy. Funny, I cannot recall seeing a negro performing this act. Maybe its because they never rewrote the script for them. “This is muh rifle, this is muh gun – witch one’s witch again?

    Leave it to a fucking hyper-sexed, Jew fag to find dark, horrid heterosexual intent in a long standing military ritual designed to keep idiot recruits from calling their rifle a “gun.” Note “gun” is another revamped, hot-button, term the Jew media has worked long and hard to ingrain into the dunder-headed goy.

    It would be great see Jews forced to follow this little routine with a toy rifle every time they misuse the term “gun.” God, what a hoot that would be to see.

    Jew dildo-heads* out there take note. – A “gun” IS a large caliber field weapon, also referred to as artillery or cannons. A “gun” IS NOT a small caliber weapon like a rifle or pistol. This is a Jew, he’s having some fun, misnaming rifles by calling them “guns.”

    *(analogous to a Limbaugh “dittohead”)

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      July 22, 2018

      @Arch Stanton

      You see, for a soldier to “control emotions; take risks; display aggression, violence and physical toughness;” is bad, somehow, for some reason. Clearly we want soldiers who cry easily, are risk-averse, and are not aggressive. That way we won’t have wars, or something…

      I wrote about this before:

      https://hipsterracist.wordpress.com/2013/08/09/is-feminism-a-gender-identity-disorder/

      You see, guys who are into getting humiliated by a dominatrix “forcing” them to dress up as women are misogynists that hate women. Why? Because they should feel *empowered* by dressing up like women, not humiliated. After all, feminists like Hillary Clinton feel *empowered* by dressing up in masculine looking pantsuits and cutting their hair short to look like men. Feminists *enjoy* taking on the masculine role, so if men do not enjoy taking on the feminine role, that can only mean they hate women and see women as “less than.”

      Therefore, if a man won’t take it up the ass, he’s homophobic BECAUSE he hates women.

      It makes perfect sense, if you are a feminist half-dyke that likes dressing up in men’s suits and having gang rape fantasies about white frat boys.

      Or something.

      Like

  4. Tyrone Trump
    July 20, 2018

    I’m not sure the Russia hysteria even hurts Trump. It seems beneficial for him to prolong it as much as necessary (until 2020).

    The only 2 ways Democrats have beat Republicans, in recent history, is by pretending to be:

    – pro-labor / anti-corporate (clinton 92, obama 12)
    – anti-war (obama 08)

    It will be hard for the Dems to sell themselves as pro-labor when they spend their time attacking White workers, demanding more non-White immigration and defending the MSM and Silicon Valley corporations.

    And it will be even harder for them to pretend to be anti-war when they are becoming an even bigger jingoistic caricature than the (((neo-cons))) in 2003.

    What’s left for them is immigrants, trannies and anti-Whiteness.

    If only they had a candidate that fit all three stereotypes… someone like Michelle.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bob saffron
      July 20, 2018

      Joan Rivers thanks you for sharing that.

      Like

    • Hipster Racist
      July 22, 2018

      @Tyrone Trump

      I don’t think the “Russiagate” thing will hurt Trump either.

      There is definitely something to the Russia/Trump connection. It’s just not as nefarious as the Democrats want us to believe.

      First of all, it’s a good thing that Trump seems to want peace with Russia.

      Second of all, “Russian interference” in the election has nothing to do with “hacking” and the DNC leaks were not “hacks” – they were leaks, probably from that DNC staffer that got killed. There was zero “Russian hacking” into voting machines and the like. Rand Paul was 100% correct when he pointed out Russia attempting to influence USA elections is par for the course and let’s face it, they are not nearly as good at it than the USA is.

      Third, a lot of Trump’s connections with “Russians” are of course Russian Jews. Many of the people the media are calling “Russian mafia” are of course Jewish organized crime figures – Mishpucka – but people like Felix Sater are just called “Russian” to confuse Americans. The “Russian oligarchs” that Trump has ties to are Jewish oligarchs and only two of them are “on Putin’s side.” And whatever influence Putin has over Trump is nothing compared to the influence that Netanyahu has over Trump. Trump’s Israeli son-in-law is a straight up Mossad agent, from a Mossad family, and the same media clutching pearls at “Russian inflence” gingerly step around the fact that Trump is literally married to the Israeli intelligence agency.

      If Putin really has video of Trump pissing on Russian hookers – would anyone be surprised? Would anyone do anything but snigger? For Odin’s sake, Trump has bragged to Playboy magazine about banging supermodels on the bar stools at Studio 54. Hell, yours truly have had sex with my ex on the couches at more than one Manhattan night club. It’s really not that uncommon for those of us with less than Sunday school sex drives.

      If Trump normalizes America’s relationship with Russia that is 100% a good thing with zero down side. That’s why people supported him, after all. Of all the Republicans in our life times, Trump honestly seems the least interested in being a “war President.” He’d rather make back room business deals. That is a good thing, not a bad thing, despite what the Jew Israelis say.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. icareviews
    July 21, 2018

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  6. icareviews
    July 21, 2018

    Yeah, it’s weird. Whomever the globo-homo zealots hate the most at the moment is either depicted through the rainbow filter or given the Warhol print treatment, with blue lips and pink mascara or whatever, as if they want to claim their enemies as their own. Obviously, the idea is to undermine the masculine image of the adversary, but it seems to involve an acknowledgement that the whole garish camp gay scene is inherently off-putting. This would be the equivalent of a Jewish cartoonist giving Hitler a big, bulbous nose and sidelocks and depicting him performing a bris to make him look bad.

    Like

    • A. Vickstrom
      July 22, 2018

      This would be the equivalent of a Jewish cartoonist giving Hitler a big, bulbous nose and sidelocks and depicting him performing a bris to make him look bad.

      Back in the 1920s newspapers often accused him of being part Rothschild (aka the bastard child of a powerful Jewish banking family).

      When you use propaganda to discredit a leader you always accuse him of being the thing that his followers hate.

      Like

      • icareviews
        July 22, 2018

        This Trump/Russia stuff isn’t even designed to discredit Trump with his followers, though. This lame conspiracy theory is 100% liberals, Jews, and shallow-staters eating their own vomit and convincing each other of how great it tastes.

        Like

    • james
      July 24, 2018

      I remember reading an old John Pilger book 25 years ago or so. At one point her mentioned how CIA/media/(can’t remember) doctored a photo of Gaddafi to look like a painted gay. I was a bit surprised at this wondering why do something so absurd.
      The innocent days before globohomo was openly declared.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. A. Vickstrom
    July 22, 2018

    There is some truth to this formulation; certainly the CIA has long been not just “embedded” in the mainstream media, but virtually the core of the mainstream media. The Washington Post is always eager to defend the CIA and the “intelligence community.”

    The CIA is also heavily embedded in Europe’s media and has been for quite a long time. If you ever have the time I’d recommend reading about the post war period and the intelligence war that happened inside Britain. Numerous local organizers within the BUF and allies of Archibald Ramsay (aka the men who had the intellect and background to build a British Nationalist movement and who were opposed to further Americanisation) died mysteriously while pro-CIA elements of the establishment were flushed with money.

    A modern example of CIA meddling is the untimely death of German journalist Udo Ulfkotte after he exposed their influence over German’s media:

    Ulfkotte published the book Gekaufte Journalisten (German Bought Journalists), in which he stated that the CIA and other secret services pay money to journalists to report stories in a certain light. According to Ulfkotte, the CIA and German intelligence (BND) bribe journalists in Germany to write pro-NATO propaganda articles, and it is well understood that one may lose their media job if they fail to comply with the pro-Western agenda.

    The CIA has immense power over the BND and both MI5 and MI6. They use this power to prevent Germany & Britain from normalizing relations with Russia:

    The only alliance that could push the Americans out of Europe is a Russian x German axis. This would be immensely healthy for Europe because the Americanisation of Europe is destroying us – demographically, culturally, and physically.

    I would implore – no, beg – Americans reading this to petition your government to get your troops out ASAP. If you genuinely care about Whites then getting the Americans to go home is one of the best things you can do.

    Like

    • Tyrone Trump
      July 22, 2018

      Ulfkotte published the book Gekaufte Journalisten (German Bought Journalists), in which he stated that the CIA and other secret services pay money to journalists to report stories in a certain light. According to Ulfkotte, the CIA and German intelligence (BND) bribe journalists in Germany to write pro-NATO propaganda articles

      Russia does the same on the anti-NATO side. The ‘good’ news is that the latter is less likely to shy away from more controversial nationalist topics, even going as far as the JQ. As long as it’s pro-Russian when it comes to geopolitical conflicts.

      The only alliance that could push the Americans out of Europe is a Russian x German axis.

      After Brexit and Merkel’s fall from grace, I would say that the HQ of EU power is the French government. The EU was always about turning ‘lesser states’ into vassals of UK/France/Germany anyway, at first economically and now politically as well.

      I would agree that the USA via the CIA is very involved in the EU, starting with the push for its creation, and probably has a lot to do with the hostility towards Russia – a few years back there was an election in Ukraine between basically a EU stooge and a Russian stooge (I believe it was Yanukovych). Needless to say, one was ‘democratic’ and ‘progressive’ (he wasn’t) while the other was literally Hitler (he wasn’t).

      With that said, European elites didn’t wait for either the EU or ‘Americanization’ to become anti-White.

      Brexit, to the extend that it’s even a thing anymore, won’t resolve the demographic problems of England. Given that some of the biggest proponents of Brexit and all things anti-EU are anti-White ‘identitarians’ like Paul Joseph Watson, I doubt it will get any better.

      At its heart, the EEA is just a way for corporations not to have to negotiate with every European leader.

      Small territory + a lot of nation states = headache for $$$

      Anti-whiteness and immigration are other problems entirely, even if there is a lot of overlap with $ – and ((( ))) obviously.

      Like

      • A. Vickstrom
        July 22, 2018

        With that said, European elites didn’t wait for either the EU or ‘Americanization’ to become anti-White.

        That’s only true in regards to France. Britain’s elites were deporting non-whites in the 1700s (it was called the Committee for the Relief of the Black Poor) and Churchill was saying that he wanted to ‘Keep England White’ in 1955:

        https://traditionalbritain.org/blog/prescience-sir-winston-churchill/

        Brexit, to the extend that it’s even a thing anymore, won’t resolve the demographic problems of England. Given that some of the biggest proponents of Brexit and all things anti-EU are anti-White ‘identitarians’ like Paul Joseph Watson, I doubt it will get any better.

        The scary thing is that it’s all going to come crashing down sooner or later. Britain is an island the size of Illinois that imports half of its food and has a population of 66 million. And we import over a half a million immigrants every year.

        You know all those horror stories about a dollar collapse followed by mass starvation & war that you see on places like Stormfront? That is far more likely to happen in Britain than in America because we can’t feed ourselves and our economy is dependent on tourism & foreign labor.

        As soon as the SHTF the Hindus (who are often doctors / engineers) will leave. The Poles will also leave. It will be a Chav vs Paki apocalypse on a scale that you can’t even imagine. Perhaps Donald Trump would put in like this:

        Believe me, we do the best civil wars. Way bigger than everyone else’s. It’s going to be horrible, so horrible. Way more horrible than anyone else’s war. Because we do the best civil wars. You haven’t seen anything yet.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        July 22, 2018

        @Tyrone Trump

        I would say that the HQ of EU power is the French government

        Interesting point. France is an independent nuclear power with their nukes completely under domestic control. The economic partnership between Germany and France *is* the economic core of the EU, the only part that really even matters. And Germany is still essentially an occupied nation – France is not, France even has a very sophisticated independent defense industry and is a major arms dealer.

        Compared to Germany, France has more room to maneuver, politically, economically, and even culturally.

        Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: