Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Letters To Hipster: Questions From A Russian Reader

Hello, Hipster Racist

I’m a 21-year old guy from Russia, I’ve been reading your blog and AryanSkynet for quite a bit, so Ive got a few questions for you if you dont mind:

1) From what I have read, I can assume that you are for an all-White ethno-state in the US, but what about other races, in particular the Black people who have been citizens of this country for many generations for now?

You ask me about other races, but what about Whites? I advocate for my race, my ethnic group – Whites, Americans. America was started for my family and I, we are the “posterity” of the Founding Fathers. The United States were founded for us, as the Founders spelled out explicitly in the Constitution.

I’m strongly anti-slavery. Bringing Africans to the North American continent was an awful crime against humanity. I wish it had never happened. I agree with Abraham Lincoln on this, both Whites and Blacks are ill served by being in the same country. Like Lincoln, I think the best course of action would have been to repatriate the Africans back to their African homelands. Liberia was set up for just such a purpose.

Dear Black Americans: This Man Could Be Your President

Of course the logistics of such a thing are quite unfeasible at the present time and in the near future. I would of course support Blacks in America having their own homeland on the North American continent, perhaps somewhere in the South East.

Of course that isn’t likely to happen in the near future either, so I would be quite content with simply allowing Black people to “go their own way” and stop trying to forcibly “assimilate” them into White society. They don’t seem particularly interested and I don’t see why they would be. An ethno-state on the North American continent is an aspirational goal, not an operational goal at this point in time.

So, right now, I’d be happy just to stop anti-whiteness. We can figure out how to build a utopia at some point in the future.

2) Do you believe in the possibility of these people’s (the Blacks, the Mexicans) forced assimilation with the White society and culture, as in the USSR, that after some generations they would have been successfly assimilated, abandoning their unacceptable racial culture, as the Black Ghetto culture or something like that? Or, because of genetics, they are impossible to change, “forever inferior”?

Why in the world would Blacks or Mexicans want to “assimilate” into White society? If Blacks and Mexicans were to “assimilate” into White society, adopt White cultures, and even breed with Whites, wouldn’t that basically spell the genocide of Blacks and Mexicans?

Mexican David Zepeda is being oppressed by Hipster Racist and just wants the opportunity to live my life.

Mexican David Zepeda is being oppressed by Hipster Racist and just wants the opportunity to live my life.

I’m anti-genocide myself. I would think that Black people in North America would want to preserve their own cultures, and of course want to preserve their own people, their own DNA, their own physically existence. I don’t understand why Mexicans, who speak a different language than me, practice a different religion than me, and have created a different culture than me, would want to “assimilate” into my society.

I’d like to think I’m an attractive fellow, but I’m no David Zepeda. I can’t imagine why David Zepeda would need to assimilate into my culture, stop speaking Spanish, abandon the Roman Catholic Church to become a lasped Presbyterian, and stop dating gorgeous Mexican women like Maite Perroni and instead long for troublesome Anglo-American gals like KFlay.

I’d just like to say I’ve never once suggested that I am “superior” to David Zepeda in any way and I suspect most men would likely think that KFlay is “inferior,” looks-wise, to Maite Perroni. So all this talk of “superior” and “inferior” sounds like your own hangups. Do Russians typically think in such ways, or it that more of a, you know, “Russian” thing?

Look- there’s no accounting for taste. Let’s leave it at that.

3) What’s wrong with communism? I’m not an expert, but from what I have heard about communism, it really does make sense. Capitalism is all about gaining profit, all about selfish desires. As far as I understand, communism tries to make people as equal as possible, to make it fair for everyone.

Mexican Maite Perroni is desperate to cross the Mexican border and throw herself at the feet of Hipster Racist

On the slim, slim chance you aren’t just trolling me, I’ll just say that history shows exactly what is wrong with Communism, and if you’re really a reader of Aryan Skynet, you’ll know this blog isn’t typically cheerleading for Capitalism exactly. The idea that Communism somehow eliminates “selfish desires” really shows that it’s more of a religion than a practical political-economic system. Selfishness is a sin – a part of the fallen human condition. The only cure for “selfish desires” – and lust – is death. Until the day they lay us in our graves, we all struggle with “selfish desires.”

Perhaps I’m a cynic, but when some politician tells us he’s going to cure humanity of our “selfish desires” if we just put him in charge of a highly centralized state with totalitarian police powers, well, that’s when I reach for my revolver.

Thats all what I could think of for now

Hope to get an answer from you,

Egor

Hope that helped, (((Egor))).

Sincerely,

хипстер расист

Advertisements

44 comments on “Letters To Hipster: Questions From A Russian Reader

  1. Pingback: Letters To Hipster: Questions From A Russian Reader | Hipster Racist

  2. Hipster Racist
    June 11, 2018

    White people:

    It’s a certainly kind of living, it’s a certain kind of style.
    Not everybody likes us, but we drive some folks wild.

    Like

  3. eyeslevel
    June 11, 2018

    No non-white has been forced to live in Amercica since 1865. Non-whites have their own countries if they feel oppressed.

    Like

    • No Anti-Whites On Our Streets!
      June 11, 2018

      There is no record of a White man enslaving any Black. Whites bought slaves from Blacks, who enslaved their fellow Blacks. Whites are the only group in history that ever cared enough about slavery to end it.

      Like

      • redarmyvodka
        June 13, 2018

        I’d also like to add that “slavery” didn’t really exist since antiquity. Serfdom which is basically a big feudalism type farm with tight control like in the agrarian south wasn’t slavery. Furthermore serfdom brought the negro into the orbit of civilization. if someone is unhappy about that fair enough but a regular person didn’t own massive estates either then or now. It’s ironic this sort of topic is brought up during a discussion of communism because so few people understand or acknowledge money/class.

        Like

    • Sam J.
      June 12, 2018

      “…No non-white has been forced to live in Amercica since 1865. Non-whites have their own countries if they feel oppressed…”

      Extremely good point and I’m been thinking along similar lines quite frequently for a while. When are we going to start telling all the anti-Whites that complain about Whites that if Whites bother them so much they should move. No one is chaining them down.

      Like

  4. eyeslevel
    June 11, 2018

    The “workers’ paradise” made life so miserable for the average worker that they had to turn the whole country into a prison surrounded by barbed wire and machines guns and shoot escapees.

    Like

    • guest
      June 11, 2018

      Well the prison a is a microcosm of the perfect liberal society. Think about it, whites are in the minority, only authorities have guns and there’s only gay marriage!

      Liked by 3 people

      • Sam J.
        June 12, 2018

        HAHA that’s good. I’ll have to remember it.

        Like

    • redarmyvodka
      June 13, 2018

      The main way communist countries maintained order was the same as in capitalism the threat of performance reviews, budget cuts, restructuring/demotion, termination of employment, and then maybe arrest. It’s a myth that people were arrested for anything less than serious crimes. Economic incentives and threat of being fired is more than enough to maintain control over a population through social/family pressure to conform.

      Despite that communist countries had good wages/benefits, high standards of living relative to the era, low crime, and powerful armies. They were also socially cohesive far more so than the so called “free world” at least today. They also left a good legacy in central/eastern Europe and Russia. Nobody wants to be part of another nation’s empire so lets not dwell on that fact.

      Like

      • bob saffron
        June 13, 2018

        Unreliable crime statistics more like. Like the biggest killing/expropriating machine of the era is going to be concerned about the welfare of its subjects? If the USSR didn’t always have a thriving black market it literally would have collapsed after the end of NEP.

        Like

      • icareviews
        June 13, 2018

        About the Soviet (((mafia))) referenced by Bob, Matthew Raphael Johnson blames the economic policies of the Brezhnev years for their ascendancy. Brezhnev’s government stressed heavy industry over consumer goods, and demand for the latter was met by the black market, enriching criminal organizations that steadily grew in influence.

        Like

      • redarmyvodka
        June 13, 2018

        Communism pioneered “tough on crime” policing. The number of people in prison, in jail, and or on supervised parole was very high in the Soviet world. Everything from mandatory minimums, maximum security prisons, and special settler colonies were employed to keep crime as low as possible together with liberal use of the death penalty. I’m convinced the United States copied the communist world when they started their own tough on crime agenda.

        The criminal underworld will always exist but you have serious problems when criminals start acting in the open. The cucked west allows criminals, degenerates, foreign aliens, and others to rampage with impunity while its soft and intellectual elites dither. The middle class at least in the Western Roman Empire ceased to exist for similar reasons hence the massive push back against against illegal immigration and so called “criminal justice reform”.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 14, 2018

        Communism pioneered “tough on truth” policing.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 14, 2018

        The idea that a State that killed and impoverished – with prejudice – countless millions of its citizens, could be possibly interested in law and order is deserving of the Walter Duranty Award.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 14, 2018

        @ Icareviews:
        War Communism was the closest to real communism and that was quickly suspended as famine and economic collapse threatened the entire revolution, ushering in Lenin’s NEP.

        But from the very beginning, the organized criminal presence in black markets was very heavy. How could it not be? Any participation in these transactions (often just to survive) was a technically a crime, and how could you enforce contracts? By non-State criminal muscle, of course. Jews benefited from international distribution networks and protection from the Administration.

        If you want an analogy in today’s “free” West. look at the narcotics business. State and criminal interests often align or at least aren’t antithetical. Police budgets are boosted, drug-dealers’ property is confiscated, extra power is devolved to the authorities, lawyers get rich and the profitability of dealing goes up, ensuring a ready supply of entrepreneur-suppliers. The only suckers are taxpayers.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 14, 2018

        Military deployed in Afghanistan, etc..

        Like

      • redarmyvodka
        June 14, 2018

        The Russian Social Democratic Labor Party (later Communist Party) existed in Russia prior to the Soviet state as a legal and legitimate party/movement. They advanced their agenda/platform through legal channels while contributing to the political, economic, cultural, and social improvement/well being of their supporters.

        War Communism was always a temporary and emergency set of policies after capitalism and Russia itself collapsed during the massive imperialist war dubbed WW1. The Soviet state fighting off its numerous enemies both foreign and domestic during and after the revolution isn’t a “crime against their own people” no matter how hard people attempt to spin it. The the state has a monopoly on force like it or not.

        There was little to no black market in the USSR because wealth, trade, and productivity were encouraged. The Soviet system spent a lot on security/defense and that was a problem but empire is always an expensive business.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 16, 2018

        “There was little to no black market in the USSR because wealth, trade, and productivity were encouraged.”

        That’s the funniest thing I’ve heard outside of a humanities course.

        Like

  5. eyeslevel
    June 11, 2018

    The slave trade is not what is making America non-white. The slave trade ended in 1807. America was 90% white in 1965. America is being made non-white by deliberate genocidal policies of mass non-white immigration combined with forced assimilation and 24/7/365 miscegenation propaganda.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Tyrone Trump
    June 11, 2018

    American Blacks (the descendants of slaves) are already as ‘assimilated’ as they can be.

    They aren’t African in culture or mentality, though they still are in temperament.

    ‘Ghetto culture’ was made in the USA.

    So maybe there is more to it than borders / language / culture as a certain conservative radio personality would say.

    Maybe something like genetics?

    As for racial hierarchy, that will always be a personal and subjective opinion.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. No Anti-Whites On Our Streets!
    June 11, 2018

    Does anyone seriously believe America will survive “Diversity” and exist with its current borders intact in 100 years, when no country or empire in history has survived it? Does it make any kind of sense to talk about kicking people out of a country when it may well not exist in the future?

    I am indifferent to a homeland for Blacks, since they already have more than 50 countries all to themselves. Supporting Black separatists will not get Whites a home, because just like Liberia a few radical Blacks will go there, but the rest will demand their right to White people.

    The object of mass immigration is to get OUT OF brown countries and INTO White countries, because no one wants to live in brown countries, not even brown people.

    So we are in the situation where no White countries are allowed anywhere on Earth and it is the Whites who are treated like runaway slaves, because Diversity means chasing down the last White person.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      June 11, 2018

      If Blacks want their own homeland I’m not going to stand in their way.

      White people don’t like hypocrites and respect people who are consistent. I’m pro-nationalism for everybody. That gives me credibility with Whites who don’t like hypocrites.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Sam J.
      June 12, 2018

      I think there’s a way to get some of what we want. Agree to pay repartitions to Blacks if they move to Africa. Say 40 acres and a mule worth of cash. Call it $250,000 and an apartment in a high rise in Liberia. This could be done cheaper than you think because of techniques developed by a Chinese company called the Broad Group. They mass produce the floors in a factory and then throw up a thirty story building in a few days.

      The key is tell the Blacks that they get the first $50,000 up front so that we can see how many will move to build apartments. Ghetto Blacks could also get it for each child. Now ask your self how many could resist $50,000 cash? It would be a lot and the ones most likely to take the offer would be the ones with the lowest time preference. Exactly the ones we want to get rid of. I bet that we could actually save money the first year the blacks were deported. The cost would be the $50,000 a year plus a apartment that I bet we could build for less than $100,000. Think of all the cost of Blacks, and it’s huge, I bet we could come out good. After 5 years the debt is paid and we would be in high cotton.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 12, 2018

        I think there’s a way to get some of what we want. Agree to pay repartitions to Blacks if they move to Africa. Say 40 acres and a mule worth of cash.

        OK, you see how Sam J is just trolling us? This isn’t a serious political proposal, it’s a meme. It’s an online joke.

        Yet he is pretending that this is “strategy.? If anyone were to take this idiotic bait, there’s no doubt Sam J would be laughing it up at how people, well, took the bait.

        He keeps on making this great plans – we’ll do this, we’ll do that – but of course he:

        1. Doesn’t have any money.

        2. Doesn’t have any platform (except for other people’s tiny little blogs.)

        3. Doesn’t have any access to the media, and if he did, he would do exactly what Little and the others have done – immediately recite the lines the Jews want them to, thus painting themselves and anyone who follows him as a stupid crank.

        4. He has ZERO ability to create a political campaign or even a mailing list.

        ALL Sam J can do is troll internet comment boxes and posture as “more hardcore than thou” because he’s “not afraid to stand up to THE JEW!!1” and “doesn’t care if they call me a Nazi!”

        Honestly, I don’t know if he just thinks we’re stupid, or if he is stupid. I’m leaning towards an off duty hasbara with a drinking problem.

        Here’s an idea, Sam? Why don’t we wave a magic wand and all the Africans will go back to Africa? That’s about as likely are your “proposal.”

        Seriously, what are you, ten?

        Like

      • eyeslevel
        June 13, 2018

        Before we can do anything, we have to discredit anti-whitism, deprogram brainwashed white people and take power. Anti-whites are in power and Republican conservatives are their fake opposition.

        Too many sincere pro-whites spend all their time thinking about what we’re going to do AFTER we’re in power but don’t do anything to GET in power. What if you had a group of soldiers who never shot at the enemy but just spent all their time contemplating what should be done after the war was won? They would be lucky if they only got flogged.

        Then there’s the deliberate subversives trying to get you to shoot in the air or shoot yourself or shoot your own guys but never do anything that really hurts the enemy.

        Like

      • Send Money!
        June 13, 2018

        @Hipster Racist
        “ALL Sam J can do is troll internet comment boxes and posture as “more hardcore than thou” because he’s “not afraid to stand up to THE JEW!!1” and “doesn’t care if they call me a Nazi!””

        Its virtue signalling. Sam is the mirror image of SJW/corporate/ Fundie Christian virtue signalling. They all virtue signal because they practice RELIGION and don’t care what works.

        “Honestly, I don’t know if he just thinks we’re stupid, or if he is stupid. I’m leaning towards an off duty hasbara with a drinking problem.”

        What were they saying about Little last week? All these Asians are going to vote for him. 20% of people are searching for him! That’s more than any other candidate! They were absolutely serious about electoral victory.

        Then Little goes out and performs like they have in every White country for the last 70 years and 99% vote against him.

        So Sam returns here and declares a stunning victory! Sam says they only spent $5000 and got 1% of the vote. Now if they had spent 100 times that, they would have got 100% of the vote! Send money!

        No need to send money to Sam, when the Jews will pay. They spent the other 99% of Sam’s budget, reminding everyone of the holocaust.

        Like

      • Send Money!
        June 13, 2018

        eyeslevel
        June 13, 2018

        Right!

        They don’t understand how to get power, because they don’t understand what Real Power is.

        They all know about the Deep State, but they don’t understand what the Deep State is. The Deep State is the millions of anti-whites the universities have been indoctrinating and ramming into the power structure for the last 50 years.

        Until anti-whitism is discredited, we will continue to see hypocrisy like Trump ordered by a judge not to block people on Twitter “because Twitter a public square”, while Pro Whites are kicked off all social media, “because corporations should be free to not to do business with anyone they don’t like”.

        Playing games of White Nationalist Sim City has done nothing to discredit anti-whitism since the internet was invented. Its just an online social activity they do instead of watching TV.

        Like

  8. guest
    June 11, 2018

    >Perhaps I’m a cynic

    It’s not cynicism really, it’s merely looking behind the spin…

    Like how “you can’t judge” just means we will judge for you.

    Like

  9. bob saffron
    June 11, 2018

    Zepeda, Perroni…look white to me.☺

    Criollos are always going to be running Mexico. The high class, wealthy and powerful in telenovelas are invariably criollos and not mestizos.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 12, 2018

      @bob saffron

      Steve Sailer has done a great job explaining the absurdity of the American rhetoric on “Hispanics.” The elites of Mexico and Central and South America are as “white” as I am, yet the typical anti-white rhetoric we hear is that middle and working class Whites (like myself) are “oppressing” the “browns” of Latin America.

      Go to any Democratic, liberal or left leaning site and 100% of the time any of the dysfunctions of Latin America are discussed it’s blamed on “the US government” and specifically the White “conservatives” and “Republicans” (code words for White Americans, like me) and “our” drug war.

      Ironically, the White elites of Mexico, Central and South America, who are far more “oppressive” of the browns that my people are, are often included in the “oppressed class.”

      So we have the comical spectacle of a very white Vicente Fox, who not only collaborates with the drug cartels but presides over a White elite that “oppresses” their brown citizens far more than any Americans Whites do, lecturing working class White Americans for not welcoming his class dumping their brown poor on us while they send money back to pay for their families – since Vicente Fox and his class doesn’t lift a finger to help their poor Browns.

      When has Vicente Fox ever lectured his own ethnic and economic class for their treatment of “their Browns?” I’m sure it’s never happened – and he’s praised by the anti-White Whites (and Jews) in America every time he lectures working class Whites Americans for supporting Trump’s immigration policies.

      Vicente Fox was invited to speak to the US Congress to browbeat Republicans for showing some slight resistance to opening the border, and the irony was lost on nearly everyone. America treats illegal aliens a million times better than Mexico treats their own illegal aliens.

      Yet, as usual, the problems of the world are blamed on people like me.

      Like

  10. bob saffron
    June 12, 2018

    Yep. “Hispanics”-for-dummies:
    https://anti-gnostic.blogspot.com/2013/09/somebody-get-these-people-clue.html

    In Latin America the obvious racial stratification is couched in terms of “class”, but everyone knows that’s just a veil.

    Like

  11. icareviews
    June 13, 2018

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  12. redarmyvodka
    June 13, 2018

    What’s the Aryan Skynet report card on Trump? I think he’s done a great job. He crushed the left, right, center, and mainstream media in 2015/2016. His performance during the primary and general election was A+. Contrary to popular belief but revolutions are led by minor nobles. The reforms only began in 2017 and we’ve got several years more to go. On that front however I’d give him a B+. The president doesn’t have legislative powers but he’s done an great job with the tools he has. I know there is a nationalist class divide between populism and vanguardism with this site supporting the latter but Trump is delivering on his promises from fighting crime, combating illegal immigration, improving the economy, changing trade policy, reducing regulations, cutting taxes (he actually raises them on rich people living on the coasts), and embracing peaceful relations with the world.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 13, 2018

      @redarmyvodka

      Trump’s greatest victory so far is on trade. He’s doing exactly what I have always wanted, and he’s doing exactly what what is left of the pro-working class left and the populist right has been asking for for years: essentially an America-first trade policy.

      Trump is directly taking on the neo-liberal ideology of “multilateral trade” which privileges multinational corporations and bypasses national soverignty.

      All the talk from the media about Trump “attacking our friends” is really just Trump renegotiating bilateral trade deals. Of course the USA and Canada are still going to trade, it’s just going to be done nation-to-nation bypassing the globalist corporate governmental structures like NAFTA, GATT, and CAFTA. Same with Europe.

      This is one issue that Trump actually understands deeply and he’s been talking about it since the 1980s when he was a sort of Ross Perot type figure.

      I’m old enough to remember in the late 1990s when the “progressive left” held protests against the World Trade Organization, the so called “Battle in Seattle.” There’s a famous documentary about it on youtube. This fight made a number of left wing activist celebrities.

      Yet these same people are now likely attacking Trump for literally giving them everything they said they wanted.

      I’ll give Trump an A+ on the trade issue.

      Also he really should get the Nobel Peace Prize for North Korea. After decades of no movement on this he’s making some headway for the first time. Another A.

      Liked by 2 people

      • redarmyvodka
        June 13, 2018

        Trump also deserves an A+ for improving the culture by delegitimizing sports ball. That was long overdue and reached a lot of GOP boomer normies/cucks.

        Hollywood has also been heavily discredited by the Me Too movement which was likely orchestrated by Trump’s treasury secretary Steve Mnuchin who represents a new generation of Skull and Bones in contrast to Bush/Kerry who want to take Trump down.

        Like

      • Tyrone Trump
        June 13, 2018

        Mnuchin represents a new generation that will make us all nostalgic before long.

        Like

      • redarmyvodka
        June 14, 2018

        I forgot to mention Trump’s A in protecting gun owners from the latest atrocity propaganda aimed at disarming them. These are weapons of defense not weapons of war so any attempt at gun control today is an attack on law abiding people.

        Trump has also shredded net neutrality a major blow to Silicon Valley which might even pose a bigger threat than Hollywood in the new media environment. Net neutrality is a bit technical but the internet is vastly better off in the hands of the telecommunications industry which created the undersea cables, satellite networks, fiber optics, and signal towers that fuel it. Search engine providers like Google and social networks like Facebook had little to do with the internet’s success but they are working very hard to undermine free speech now. However more needs to be done including fines and break ups of these monopolies so B.

        Trump was average even weak in terms of appointments. I still think firing Flynn was the biggest mistake of his presidency and undermined a successful transition, fueled more illegal leaks, and legitimized the Russian collusion hoax. In terms of smashing illegal immigration, destroying sanctuary cities/states, engaging in mass deportations, fighting crime, investigating leaks, and generally striking fear into people of color there is no one better than Jeff Sessions as attorney general. I think in exchange for recusing himself on the Russian collusion hoax he was able to operate freely without even a peep of opposition from the media.

        On the congressional side Devin Nunes and the US Congress House Intelligence Committee has really stepped up. They’ve basically revealed a coup attempt by the powers that be on par with what they first did against Nixon and later Clinton in the 1990s. However we’ve already seen how those movies played out and therefore this year’s midterm elections will be decisive perhaps the most important in modern history. I still think the future of the nationalist movement is taking over the GOP. Any and all attempts to operate beyond mainstream politics has been an utter failure.

        Like

  13. Egor Егорка
    June 14, 2018

    Всем привет

    Хипстер Рэйсист, thanks for your answer. Unfortunately, I can’t participate in a full-scale discussion about any of these subjects due to the lack of appropriate language skills, history and theory knowledge.

    First of all, an experience of communicating with a person of a different culture and, basically, from another world is really interesting.

    On this site I like to read about the US culture and it’s internal affairs, like stuff about 9/11 and Trump. Also, about the counterculture of the 1960s. I wish someone wrote about the Civil War.

    And no, the Russians do not think in terms of “superior” and “inferior” about others, so, I guess, it’s my own hangups. But we do have some little prejudices about other races, especially the illegal immigrants from post-Sovet Central Asia, as they can’t even speak Russian properly. Our situation with them is similar to that of yours with the Mexicans.

    “or it that more of a, you know, “Russian” thing?” I haven’t quite got it.

    In my opinion, nationalism in the US is completely different from nationalism in Russia. In the US it’s one thing, but on the other side of the globe nationalism, to be honest, is a CIA tool to balkanize undesirable countries like Yugoslavia and USSR. In modern Russia, there was an attempt to “free” Chechnya from the tyrannical Putin. Now, there is Ukraine.

    As for communism, no, I wasn’t “trolling” you. I’m not going to argue here for the reasons I mentioned above. If you and other people here want to believe that the communism is the evil incarnate or something, so be it. Maybe someday in the future we will be able to have a proper discussion about that.

    I guess you’ve put my name in parentheses because I sound like a Jewish “troll”, hahah.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      June 16, 2018

      Got to break a few eggs to get that tasty omelette, right?
      https://www.cvltnation.com/brutal-drawings-from-the-gulag/

      Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 17, 2018

      @Egor Егорка

      nationalism in the US is completely different from nationalism in Russia. In the US it’s one thing, but on the other side of the globe nationalism, to be honest, is a CIA tool to balkanize undesirable countries like Yugoslavia and USSR. In modern Russia, there was an attempt to “free” Chechnya from the tyrannical Putin. Now, there is Ukraine.

      During the USSR days, the Soviets would fund and encourage “Black power” movements, a form of nationalism, in order to cause trouble in the USA. Not at all different than the CIA fomenting nationalist movements in the Russian empire to cause trouble.

      Nationalism isn’t at all different in Russia than in the USA, both Russia and the USA will always have constant problems because of ethnic/nationalist diversity. You may be a Russian patriot, beliving that all ethnicities can co-exist peacefully under the Russia Empire, but as you yourself point out, you have trouble with post-Soviet migrants that “can’t even speak Russian properly.” Why would they, it’s not their first langauge.

      Nationalism is the answer to the diversity problem – for Russians and Americans.

      As for communism, in my view the problems are the same with capitalism. They are both ideologies, and ideologies tend to work great on paper and not at all in the real world. The USSR never made “communism” work correctly, the USA never made “capitalism” work correctly.

      There’s just too much blood spilled in the name of communism, “equality” etc., for me to be at all interested in trying it again. In fact, I don’t even think it’s worth arguing about.

      Also, yes, your questions pretty much seemed like typical anti-white trolling. If you’re really a Russian, living in Russia, it’s likely you don’t really understand the situation in American any more than I understand the situation in Russia.

      All I can say is I hope you identify as “White” and recognize that we share common ground in DNA and even culture (Christianity, Europeanism, etc.,) One of these days the Chinese may be the world power and they aren’t going to see you and I as a “Russian” and an “American” but two “round eyes.”

      So let’s put aside our differences as much as we can and try to work together for our common interests!

      Like

  14. james
    June 16, 2018

    Great replies HR.

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: