Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch
The CIA’s house newspaper, the Washington Post, ran a telling article during the recent meeting of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee in Washington DC last week. Titled “The dark roots of AIPAC, ‘America’s Pro-Israel Lobby’,” the article explains that AIPAC was formed “to spin positive PR after Israeli atrocities” and documents the founding of AIPAC in the 1950s to contain the PR damage done to the Zionist project by a purposeful massacre of Palestinian women and children by a special Israeli army unit:
on Oct. 15, 1953, all hell broke loose. News spread that a special Israeli army unit had struck into the Jordanian-occupied West Bank and committed a massacre in the Palestinian village of Qibya, killing more than 60 civilians indiscriminately in retaliation for the murder of a Jewish woman and her two children in Israel on the night of Oct. 12.
The strike reflected Israeli policy. Ever since the end of the 1948 war, Palestinians had frequently crossed the so-called “Green Line” into Israel. Most had been driven or had fled from their homes in what was now Israel and simply wished to return. But some committed violence against Israelis. Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion had fixed on a policy of reprisals — military assaults, intentionally disproportionate, on local Arab populations — as a response to any such attacks. After the Oct. 12 killings, Ben-Gurion and top colleagues chose nearby Qibya to suffer retribution.
The author of the article, Doug Rossinow, “teaches history at the University of Oslo, and is currently writing a history of American Zionism from 1948 to 1995.” The location is likely significant, as Norway is perhaps the Zionist regime’s most vociferous critic and Palestine’s greatest friend in Europe. In fact, Norway’s advocacy for Palestinian rights were a major reason cited by Zionist terrorist Anders Breivik for his murder of 77 teenagers and young adults in 2011, a terrorist attack on civilians openly celebrated by many Israelis.
That the Washington Post would publish such a piece during AIPAC’s annual conference in DC is astonishing. As Pat Buchanan has noted, the US Congress is “Israeli occupied territory” and the recent AIPAC gala showcased unwavering bipartisan support for the apartheid regime in occupied Palestine, speeches delivered by conservative South Carolina Republican and Trump Ambassador to the United Nations Nimrata Haley (alias “Nikki”) and Chuck Schumer, the Senator from New York and perhaps the most powerful elected Democrat in the country.
If anything, Rossinow’s brief history of AIPAC shows that “the more things change, the more they stay the same.” Then, as now, powerful Jews with American citizenship, many born in the United States, demonstrated not any sort of “dual loyalty” to both the country on their US passport and their ethno-state in the Middle East, but an undisguised “single loyalty” – to the international Jewish nation and its new headquarters in occupied Palestine. The Jews of AIPAC do not lobby Israel in the interests of the United States, but only the other way around: the United States is seen as an “asset” for the Zionist entity.
There’s clearly no “dual” loyalty here.
Since before Trump’s election, Democrats have gone to great lengths to portray Trump as an agent of Vladimir Putin’s Russia, and despite the denials of Trump’s fanboys, there are some connections between Trump’s family, professional and political network and Russia. But it’s likely Trump’s connection with organized crime figures in Russia are not those under the control of Putin, but instead, likely Putin’s political enemies. The same “liberal” networks that the USA has painstakingly set up in Russia since the collapse of the Soviet Union, in order to influence their elections, are the networks with the closest connections to Trump – and the American “Deep State” that is portrayed as being anti-Trump.
And those Russian connections “just happen” to be a) Jewish and b) Zionist – a fact that is virtually never discussed in the Western media, and virtually unremarked upon by Trump’s fans in the ostensibly pro-White and counter-semitic “Alt Right.”
Instead those interested must “read between the lines” such as the recent controversies over Trump’s Israeli son-in-law, Jared Kushner, who has just had his security clearance revoked:
Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior aide Jared Kushner has lost his top-level security clearance, sources familiar with the matter said Tuesday, a decision with potentially profound implications for the US administration.
Two sources, who could not speak on the record because the status of security clearances is classified, confirmed US media reports that the 37-year-old White House aide will no longer be able to access America’s most closely guarded secrets.
The White House — up to and including the president himself — refused to comment on the record, but officials insisted that the decision would not impact Kushner’s role.
Officially, it’s Kushner’s “varied business connections” to all sorts of countries that are giving the national security establishment heartburn over Kushner’s access to classified US information, but a quick look at who Kushner is makes it obvious. Kushner is the son of Charles Kushner, a Mossad agent intimately connected to the cover up of the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York City and Washington DC, and was involved in placing the Israeli spy, Golan Cipel, in charge of the New Jersey Department of Homeland Security, in a position to aid and abet the 9/11 cover up and to also funnel a huge amount of anti-terrorism money – and intelligence – to their bosses in Tel Aviv.
The Kushner/Cipel affair, in fact, is eerily reminiscent of the scandal involving Zionist pedophile blackmailer Jeffrey Epstein, Cipel being introduced to the closeted homosexual governor of New Jersey, Jim McGreevy, while the later was on a trip to Israel. The two began a practically open homosexual affair while Kushner’s father, Charles, sponsored Cipel for a visa.
Rossinow’s article, Kushner losing his security clearance, and the recent exposure of Zionist censor Bari Weiss are developments that offer some hope that the Zionist regime’s infiltration of the US government is facing unprecedented push back.