Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Aryanism Incorporated

Followers of Richard Spencer and the AltRight.com crew have probably noticed how the smirkers’ frat-house-channeling Alt-Right Politics podcasts have, over the last several months, placed a new emphasis on imperialism-posting, as the pledge brothers might be wont to put it. Is Spencer’s rape-and-pillage posturing – going as far as to say, for instance, that “vainglory” and aspirations to empire are two of the few legitimate justifications for going to war – merely an overly audacious effort at resuscitating the confidence and the sense of destiny of a movement that so often finds itself blackpilled by the turn of events? Or is another and more ambitious agenda in play?

incorp2

White nationalism is disadvantaged by its lack of powerful institutional and corporate support. Organized Jewry, contrarily, with its penchant for global shit-starting, finds a natural ally in the military-industrial complex. Is Spencer signaling potential willingness on the part of the Alt-Right to work hand-in-hand with the American Empire’s too-big-to-fail “defense” sector? Could wars for profit be waged in police actions for the protection of, for instance, the Boers in South Africa, the Swedes in “Sweden”, or the Germans in immigrant-drenched Deutschland? How about regime change in Israel?

If this is too ridiculous a hypothetical future to countenance, then are there any other industries that might be persuaded to partner with white nationalism – even if only at the implicit level – in the furtherance of mutual interests? Alt-tech something-or-other, maybe? What are the sectors of the economy, if any, whose profit margins are dictated by whites’ spending behavior? Are there particular businesses that will be adversely affected when America is no longer majority-white? Is it too insane to imagine a time when white nationalist media will have its own corporate sponsorship – even something as paltry as 365Black-style fast food pandering?

incorp

Recently embarrassed activist “Eli Mosley” has suggested that white nationalists ought to advocate the legalization of marijuana – partly in order to steal the energy of a popular but traditionally leftist issue, but also because the decriminalization of marijuana sales essentially transfers a powerful economic engine out of a black-market economy dominated by violent minorities and transforms it into a job creator for respectable suburbanites. Are there any other examples of sectors open to conquest?

Has anti-whiteness been so successfully incentivized both socially and financially that no businesses of consequence would ever be willing to break from the herd? Think outside the box. Who are whites’ natural economic allies? Who has a profit incentive to help? Which industries would collapse without the continued support of whites and would therefore be most susceptible to an economic boycott in a posited future of heightened white political solidarity? People keep accusing Russia of sponsoring the white nationalist movement in the U.S. What if it actually came true someday?

Rainer Chlodwig von K.

Advertisements

About icareviews

Author, Protocols of the Elders of Zanuck: Psychological Warfare and Filth at the Movies

82 comments on “Aryanism Incorporated

  1. Pingback: Aryanism Incorporated | icareviews

  2. NoddingHead
    February 22, 2018

    Love that article. I hear it in the voice of Doctor Evil.

    I think it is true that White people will eventually have to go full-on imperialist if we really want our race to survive. Spencer may be right. Finite planet, finite resources. Africa didn’t suppprt a billion people before White people started allowing their own governments to tax their own White people to pay for food subsidies etc in Africa.

    Like

    • icareviews
      February 23, 2018

      “Conquer or die”, eh?

      Like

      • Mike R
        March 11, 2018

        *or be smothered by weaponized negros and mestizos

        I’ve always found it amusing that nobody knows who to blame for the migrant minority invasion of the white states in America and Europe. Not only are local capitalists invested, there are an infinite number of foreign and domestic interests served by such a movement. Jews count themselves among the most enthusiastic, but they are hardly alone.

        Like

  3. NoddingHead
    February 22, 2018

    Unfortunately, it has become clear that our media and academia (((overlords))) only allow military actions against enemies of Israel now.

    Like

  4. NoddingHead
    February 22, 2018

    North Vietnam? Never an enemy of Israel. Massive protests against that allowed and encouraged.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Felix
      March 2, 2018

      Broke: Jews organized protests against Vietnam war because they weren’t an enemy of Israel.

      Woke: Jews organized Vietnam war so all the fire-breathing anti-communists would be on the other side of the world getting their nuts shot off in an unwinnable useless conflict while they completed their cultural revolution back home.

      Like

  5. NoddingHead
    February 22, 2018

    Makes me a bit ill……

    “Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech to Congress interrupted by standing ovations” on YouTube

    Liked by 1 person

  6. NoddingHead
    February 22, 2018

    American Jews are only “peaceniks” when only traditional American interests are involved. (((They))) are total warmongers if Israel’s interests are involved. Media follows suit. So utterly clear to anyone paying attention!

    Liked by 2 people

  7. NoddingHead
    February 22, 2018

    “Which industries would collapse without the continued support of whites…”

    Mining, agriculture, energy production, pretty much anything that takes physical and intellectual labor.

    Like

    • Mike R
      March 11, 2018

      All of which are ripe for automation and have a fairly small labor footprint.

      Like

  8. JimJams
    February 23, 2018

    I know this is a joke article, but it is a very serious issue that has been holding Pro Whites back for decades.

    Money raising outfits write articles tailored to a small group of people who might send them money. They send those people letters begging them for money, so they can stay at home writing even more articles targeting this same group asking them for even more money.

    Eventually this money raising activity becomes their sole reason for existing and like all institutions Whites have built in the past, they all turn Respectable, because virtue signaling from Institutions is what Whites just LURVE to do!

    As you have probably guessed by now, my point is money raising outfits don’t change anything, because they only speak to a small group of people.

    Hunter Wallace is a prime example of this mentality. He said he doesn’t care what normies think of Alt-Right antics (because normies don’t send him money obviously!). Hunter poo pooed the serious meme spreaders who worked for years for this revolution, saying what they did doesn’t work. Yet strangely this same Hunter is an expert memester when it comes to money raising! Hunter repeats endlessly that it is our duty to join organizations and send them money. I assume so Hunter can stay at home to collect this money! lol

    Instead of sending them money, we should encourage those who excel at following crowds from the front (“Leaders”) to get off our welfare and go and get a job that contributes to society.

    Then we should ween our people off this fantasy idea that a “Leader” will come and save us and instead encourage them to get off their backsides and spread effective memes. Effective memes are memes that change things in our favor.

    I will give you a clue on what is not effective. Another money raising outfit, (((Daily Stormer))), posting We will gas you memes at the most powerful Jews in the country, does not recruit normie Whites to our cause, it disgusts them, but it does motivate disinterested jews into banding together to suppress Pro Whites.

    Liked by 1 person

    • JimJams
      February 23, 2018

      Another FAIL with money raising outfits is, He who gives the money controls the organization.

      Like

    • icareviews
      February 23, 2018

      I’m doing some joking here, but this isn’t just a facetious piece. What about Bob’s point about the banks? Do large businesses’ dependency upon the banks for capital mean that the twain – corporate influence and white advocacy – shall never meet? I’m trying to prompt some brainstorming here.

      Like

      • bob saffron
        February 23, 2018

        Thanks to the fractionally-reserved banking cartel and its backer, the Federal Reserve, debt is cheaper than it otherwise would be. If one goes back over a century, entrepreneurs relied more on equity and less on debt than is the case now. At the big end of town, where quarterly performance is all, under-geared businesses will get taken over, and geared up to increase ROE.

        Small business owners – overwhelmingly white – are often forced to rely on equity (banks being risk-averse) and this makes them a natural fit with a pro-white agenda.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        February 23, 2018

        Dissident shareholder activism can, and indeed will, be done if whites are to ever regain control over their destiny. Even if unsuccessful ( see (((banks))) argument) it will be profile-raising.
        https://www.greenbiz.com/article/it-looks-year-will-be-big-investor-activism

        Like

      • JimJams
        February 23, 2018

        It wouldn’t matter where this money came from. If you raise any money at all, it should be gotten rid off immediately. Spend it on billboard adds, robo calls, etc to get your message out. Do not waste a dime on brick and mortar, or salaries for intellectuals so they can swan around in these buildings.

        If you want to be effective you help ordinary people who care about a core issue to do the work themselves. You help them not by declaring yourself their Leader, but by becoming their coach, so they understand they must do the work themselves.

        If you want to be effective with big business you make them fear offending you. Hipster Racist says as much below below.

        Everyone fears organized jewry because they go ape when anyone crosses them and they use this offense to run money punishment schemes to extort money from business and individuals. Whites as a group have no power, because we don’t take offense and get even.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        February 23, 2018

        As a general comment, having banks as a major influence on corporate policy is stultifying for innovation. Many banks don’t want to unleash competition (by funding upstarts) that might harm their larger clients and their ability to repay loans.

        Liked by 1 person

    • BMan
      February 24, 2018

      I’ve recently started reading Hunter Wallace (about a month or so). I have yet to see a single meme looking for money. Maybe I just don’t pay attention.

      No, I haven’t sent him (or anyone else) money.

      Like

      • JimJams
        February 24, 2018

        When I used to read his blog he would harp on about it.

        I read and posted on his blog for 5 years hoping he would pick up our memes and use them, but he never did. He just reports the news and wrote boring essays that no normie will ever read.

        When he did accept that memes work it was *after* Trump was elected. So he played no part in that particular white revolution. And get this, the memes he thought were effective were not anti-White and the global White Genocide, but pictures of silent sarcastic frogs.

        So apparently when Whites are called racist, Hunter thinks they are going to pull out a picture of a frog and flash it silently at the anti-Whites. And yeah and frogs are going to make them think about their survival.

        I also argued with him before that disaster at Charlottesville. During that argument I came to the realization he is retarded and was a complete waste of time and I haven’t bothered with his blog since.

        I am no longer interested in what his group does, but I will bring them up as an example of what not to do.

        No membership organizations. No Institutions. Just effective memes showing Whites how to defend themselves and go on the attack.

        Like

  9. bob saffron
    February 23, 2018

    TRS has shown there is a big, unsatisfied demand for P-C-irreverent, alternative media.

    As per your erstwhile collaborator, clytemnestra57, to fight a centralized power structure you must both withhold support and resources for it, at the same time favoring local, informal and so illegible networks.

    Big business will continue to be subordinate to the banks until major monetary reforms are enacted. That might be a generation or two away.

    Like

    • Adit
      February 24, 2018

      I think a lot of these informal networks will happen organically without most people even thinking about it. For instance, when I need a service I always try to find a local white small business for the task/product. If There is nothing local, I’ll find a small white business somewhere else. Then I’ll recommend these companies to one another if the opportunity arises. Poof, instant network. This happens all the time without people thinking about it;I just do it deliberately. It’s something small we can do in our everyday lives and soon it becomes second nature. Obviously, it’s not possible to do this with everything but when I can, I do it even if it costs more or isn’t as convenient.

      Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        February 24, 2018

        Exactly. It’s easy to look at the big picture and despair. But white revanchism is going to be like dew-drops forming, merging and eventually becoming the flood.

        Like

    • I’m hoping crypocurrencies will speed up the process. Between those and the chinese making moves to abandon the dollar, I’m very hopeful!

      Like

  10. Hipster Racist
    February 23, 2018

    Who are whites’ natural economic allies? Who has a profit incentive to help? Which industries would collapse without the continued support of whites and would therefore be most susceptible to an economic boycott in a posited future of heightened white political solidarity?

    Finally someone is asking the important questions. The entire purpose of the whole “manosphere” thing was to figure out a way to encourage family formation, thus, more White people. Economic incentives were a huge part of that.

    If Whites thought of themselves as a people, as a nation, we’d have to be catered to by the global corporations because no one could afford to alienate us.

    See the recent controversies at Google – a huge company that has triggered a pretty serious backlash due to their anti-white policy stances – although everyone already notices that Google pretty much only hires Whites (including Jews) and Asians. They try to fill their “diversity” quota by hiring … Whites (including Jewish) and Asian women and a whole rainbow of sexual freaks. But people notice, hey Google, where’s all the Black people? Where are the Mestizos?

    I mean, Google knows – everyone knows – but they can’t say. A lot of Google’s anti-White posturing is to be “more diversity than thou” to prevent lawsuits from the Al Sharpton and La Raza types.

    Once someone in the ad industry pointed out that – it’s true – in commercials regular White guys are always the butt of the jokes. He said the reason was simple – White men don’t complain. Every other group will call in to complain, write nasty articles in the media, and threaten lawsuits. White men just brush it off.

    Maybe it’s time for Whites to start taking offense. Fake it if you have to.

    Liked by 3 people

    • bob saffron
      February 23, 2018

      Employers like Limehouse & Sons deserve publicity as unsympathetic to white interests after firing Nigel Krofta, recognized as an attendee at the Charleston, Unite-the-Right rally.

      https://www.limehousesons.com/

      Liked by 2 people

    • BMan
      February 24, 2018

      You just illuminated my entire BuelahMan shtick.

      Like

    • Adit
      February 24, 2018

      We not only need to complain loudly, but stopping buying from them and go to their competitors and let both parties know why. This was pointed out on another site that the NRA, with businesses canceling contracts due to the Florida shooting, would be in an absolutely perfect position to do this kind of thing. THIS is the kind of stuff WN2.0 should be doing. Forget about writing essays and other useless crap, this would actually be helpful.

      Liked by 2 people

      • icareviews
        February 24, 2018

        Okay, good points, but I’ll continue writing essays and other useless crap, if nobody minds.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        February 24, 2018

        Writing useless essays and crap is like going to church. If you’ve heard one parable or sermon, you’ve heard them all. But the communion with others of like mind is invaluable, strengthens resolve and boosts morale.

        Liked by 2 people

      • bob saffron
        February 24, 2018

        “Essays and other useless crap” is what a non-dyslexic would have meant to say.

        Like

  11. Pingback: White Incorporated | Hipster Racist

  12. BMan
    February 24, 2018

    How about instead of attempting political achievements, we simply make cannabis legal because it is a miracle medicine.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. bob saffron
    February 24, 2018

    I worry about Spencer’s fondness for pan-….

    Like

  14. bob saffron
    February 24, 2018

    I mean, the idea that you can out-Jew the Jew and pull off a top-downer is both fanciful and unnecessary:

    “All things equal, Jews like strong central governments, not a pastiche of local decision makers catering to majorities. Perry’s recent tantrum directed at Ben Bernanke is not the type of thing that wins over most Jews. Indeed, the whole states-rights discourse leaves most on edge. His disdain for Social Security and Medicare ought make for some interesting back-and-forth with older Jewish voters in the Sunshine State.

    Jews are also impervious to the charms of “small-town America” solicitations the likes of which Sarah Palin employed in 2008. Some commentators, I am one of them, believe that such appeals spooked GOP-curious Jewish voters who prefer cities and federal governments to backwaters and volatile statehouses.

    Jews, like all minorities, appreciate lawful order and if they are taxed a bit more for the privilege, so be it. Perry’s abhorrence of D.C. is not a winning issue for him among this constituency.”

    https://www.chronicle.com/blogs/brainstorm/pick-perry-and-the-jews-an-introduction/38389

    Like

  15. james
    February 24, 2018

    Interesting.

    Like

  16. NoddingHead
    February 24, 2018

    “White men don’t complain….”

    I think we will start complaining and we will also start getting more combative, and building our bodies more and stop being such flabby pussies. White people dominated the world for a long long time and it wasn’t just because we were intellectuals. We are also genetically physically stronger, when we try. We just don’t seem to be trying anymore.

    Liked by 1 person

  17. NoddingHead
    February 24, 2018

    February 23, 2018

    “Conquer or die”, eh?

    Starting to think that it might be true. Our white ancestors probably thought it was true. And they conquered. Our white ancestors did indeed conquer continents, and they did make a bigger and better world for their white progeny. I am proudly part of that progeny.

    Like

  18. NoddingHead
    February 25, 2018

    I think (hope) white people will regain their dominant strength soon as it slowly becomes more clear to everyone of us that their is indeed a war on us. Maybe the white era of softness is coming to an end.

    Like

  19. NoddingHead
    February 25, 2018

    I for one have started doing pushups again. Damn, they are hard. I did let myself go too soft.

    Like

  20. NoddingHead
    February 25, 2018

    White people need to start taking care of their bodies and their environment again.

    Like

  21. Hazelshade
    February 25, 2018

    “Are there any other examples of sectors open to conquest?”

    Chickens and eggs. They’re doable in a suburban backyard.

    Beer. An Anheuser Busch leader predicted about five years back that the microbrew fad would be over by now. He planned to buy all the abandoned hardware cheap, start yet another AB spinoff, and make a killing. No such luck 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      February 26, 2018

      @Hazelshade

      Racist hipsters love free range chicken and microbrews. You’d have to pry them from their cold, dead hands.

      Liked by 1 person

  22. smartwhiteguy
    February 26, 2018

    The only industry I can think of that is almost entirely supported by White spending is book publishing, but I’m sure you know who runs that.
    So, I don’t know, camping and winter sports?
    Whites also love dangerous stuff like skydiving and bungee jumping (is that still in?).
    The only other thing I can think of is spearfishing.

    Like

  23. NoddingHead
    February 26, 2018

    Can’t stand the cuckservatives who think anti-environnentalism is somehow a form of manliness. It most certainly isn’t. It is just cucky materialism, one of the most basic tenets of Marxism. Environmental conservation is one of true conservatism’s most important features. Climate-science denial is as bad or mayve worse than race-science denial.

    Like

    • icareviews
      February 27, 2018

      I would make a distinction between, on the one hand, disregard for conservationism, which is obviously bad, and on the other skepticism about “climate change”. I don’t pretend to be an expert on the science or even to have a rudimentary understanding of it, but I do know that climatology is a highly politicized area of research, with lots of money at stake both in terms of government and corporate funding for climatology programs at universities as well as the billions that stand to be reaped through carbon-point-trading schemes. We know, too, via leaked emails, that in at least some cases the “global warming” data have actually been fabricated. Nor is “climate-science denial” strictly a matter of boilerplate cuckservatism, as this article by the late progressive journalist Alexander Cockburn demonstrates:

      https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/12/24/anthropogenic_global_warming_is_a_farce.html

      Like

      • bob saffron
        February 27, 2018

        As clouds and solar activity are beyond the modeling capability of the AGW congregation, they choose to ignore them. Consider that when you next get a shiver as a cloud blocks the Sun.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        February 27, 2018

        In addition to the obvious bankruptcy of the AGW science (why would you ever need 17 different models and not one, if you actually understood what was going on?), the carbon tax is a wealth transfer from the little white guy to (((Wall St))), big business and the Third World. Those lovely carbon credits and the derivatives markets that they’d create for JPM, GS to trade; the regulatory thicket that big business pays compliance units to cut through, but which hobbles the little man; and the Pakistani farmer who sells carbon credits to Western intermediaries because it’s cheaper to grow jute there than in Alabama, etc., etc..

        The funniest thing about AGW is that politicians now call it “Climate Change” because satellites record temperatures trending down (reduced Sun-spot activity) for the better part of two decades and “Warming” is increasingly hard to sell to the public.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        February 27, 2018

        Securing potable water will spark wars in our lifetime. Just ask the Palestinians.

        Like

  24. NoddingHead
    February 26, 2018

    The big problem is that (((globalists))) and (((international merchants))) promote American NIMBY environmentalism as much as they can. They promote (((interdependency))). And because of this they knew it was important to control the American environmental movement. And so they did. A few decades ago, Colorado governor Richard Lamm was a bigwig in the Sierra Club. He was against open borders and easy immigration from the Third World. He was eliminated from the Sierra Club and faded away. Big political environmental groups like the Sierra Club became pro-immigration at the same time as fighting all domestic production of raw materials that we consume so much of.

    Like

  25. NoddingHead
    February 27, 2018

    Should laugh all of the anti-environmentalist cucky pretenders out of the movement, they are a huge hindrance. Way too much baggage being carried over from earlier years of religious libertariansism and Ayn Rand worship.

    Like

  26. bob saffron
    February 27, 2018

    Funny how Rand is a virtual unknown in the USSR, unlike Orwell. Lack of literary talent might be only half the reason.

    https://shlapentokh.wordpress.com/2010/08/10/the-marxist-and-bolshevik-roots-of-ayn-rand%E2%80%99s-philosophy/

    Like

    • bob saffron
      March 1, 2018

      Racism
      by Ayn Rand

      “Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man’s genetic lineage — the notion that a man’s intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors.”

      cf.:

      Like

      • icareviews
        March 1, 2018

        Life is so short and her books are so long. Don’t know if I’ll ever find the time for this legendarily self-impressed figure.

        Like

    • bob saffron
      March 1, 2018

      I read The Fountainhead when but a callow youth. The Manichaeism of her characters was way too one-dimensional, comic bookish. And, as with cruder works of propaganda, Rand invests the characters with absolutely no irony or sense of humor. Because she’s the world’s preeminent serious thinker, right?

      Forget about the richness and subtlety of a Dostoyevsky or a Bulgakov.

      I couldn’t get past the beginning of Atlas Shrugged; it’s woefully bad.

      Liked by 1 person

  27. bob saffron
    February 27, 2018

    The claim has been made the Rosenbaum’s father was friendly with Genrikh Yagoda and in this way obtained her a travel permit. I can find nothing to corroborate this, but suffice to say, permits weren’t granted liberally.

    Like

  28. NoddingHead
    February 28, 2018

    That is very interesting. The ideology she promoted with her books started shortly after WWII seems geared toward the promotion of atomization, individualism, and an all-encompassing materialism. Roark’s glorious buildings, all built by him alone for his own individual glory. Etc. Big media promoted her and books and sales soared through the roof and are still big. Neocon philosophy. Of course the “Cold War” started at almost exactly the same time as Ayn Rand’s “philosophy” started to be popularized.

    Like

  29. NoddingHead
    February 28, 2018

    I am now starting to wonder how and why the Soviet Union just suddenly decided in 1991 to give up their power and dissolve itself. No threat of war, no really massive internal revolutionary activity. The Russian people had long before been thproughly pacified and offered no real threat to Soviet or Western (Jewish) power. Can you imagine the US doing that, giving up so much power? I suspect that the Jewish powers controlling the USSR (in cooperation with the Jewish-controlled West since 1917) decided that, after 72 years of absolute control, when all of the old “reactionary” people who might still remember who developed and owned the assets before the Jewish Bolsheviks stole them in 1917 were either dead or too old to matter, and it was time to “privatize” all of those assets. And they did! And Jewish “oligarchs” ended up owning almost everything! Amazing.

    Like

    • icareviews
      February 28, 2018

      “… the Jewish powers controlling the USSR (in cooperation with the Jewish-controlled West since 1917) …”

      I think you’re oversimplifying a complex history here by suggesting “the Jewish powers” were “controlling the USSR” in an uninterrupted fashion since 1917 – and 1991 isn’t strictly a matter of the Soviet establishment “giving up”, as there was actually a failed coup attempt by a group of hardliners who didn’t want to relinquish Communist Party control. Your theory makes no sense, in any case. If Jews were in “absolute control” for 72 years, as you indicate, and essentially owned the country, then what would even be the point of privatizing their assets among themselves? I do believe that the Cold War was, at a certain level, a piece of gargantuan theater; but it would be a mistake to discount shifting centers of power within the Soviet bureaucracy or to believe that every element of history is puppeteered.

      Like

      • bob saffron
        March 1, 2018

        The post-war exodus of Jews from USSR and the manner in that emigration became a bargaining chip used by Soviet administrations to extract benefits from Western governments (pressured by their respective Jewish lobbies) speaks to a diminution of direct Jewish power.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        March 1, 2018

        Stalin’s tenure at the top demarcates the decline of Jewish influence in the USSR. His anti-Semitism has probably been exaggerated, but he probably wasn’t the greatest friend the Jews ever had. As for Zionism, the USSR was initially supportive of the new state of Israel, but later turned against it and worked with Arab governments for arms deals and more.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        March 1, 2018

        The Space race a clear case of State apparatchiks of both blocs enjoying an alignment of interests at the expense of their respective subjects.

        Like

  30. NoddingHead
    February 28, 2018

    I’m thinking that the whole Bolshevik thing might have just been a huge scam to steal an immense amount of wealth from White nations and communities. As soon as the Jews realized that Bolshevism wasn’t going to be popularly accepted, the big Jews switched tactics and started promoting radical, deracinated individualism in the West. Greenspan, Ayn Rand, all of that. Of course, owning the Federal Reserve member banks that supplied loans to our government for the enormous “arms race”, entirely paid for by taxes from White people in both the West and in the Soviet Union + Warsaw Pact nations, resulted in imcredibly immense enrichments during the 4.5 decades of the “Cold War”.

    Like

  31. NoddingHead
    February 28, 2018

    Bolshevism was a gigantic, three-generation Jewish swindle, in other words. And fake “free trade” and “free markets” is the current swindle. All supported by taking advantage of White altruism, respect for individual rights, and our propensity for fairness. All I can say now is do not ever let them subvert the 2nd Amendment.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      March 1, 2018

      The USSR was destined to fail economically (no way to price factors of production) but was kept alive by Western aid and a flourishing (((black market))), now shifted to Little Odessa, NY.
      https://tinyurl.com/ya8nr4c3

      Like

      • icareviews
        March 1, 2018

        I won’t contest that; but, at the same time, I would still suggest that such a scenario was preferable in *many* ways to the depredations the globalist consensus would visit upon the country if, for example, Russia were suddenly ridded of Putin. Black markets arise where needs or desires are forbidden, it’s true; but prohibition regimes can at least serve the function of placing an inconvenience tax on the desired good or service. Take prostitution. For a long time, the Soviet establishment basically pretended that whoredom had been eradicated in the USSR. It wasn’t true, but the shame associated with prostitution by the establishment culture at least encouraged women to behave in public with some level of propriety. Even if false, such a regime I would suggest is preferable – even if only on the aesthetic plane – to a totally open and sexually “free” society in which girls are encouraged to cut off all their hair, get tattoos and facial piercings, wear pussy hats, and mate with subhumans.

        Like

  32. bob saffron
    March 1, 2018

    As punishment you will repeat “baptists and bootleggers” one thousand times or sit through Once Upon a Time in America with no toilet breaks. Victory just around the corner in the the War on Drugs™, too. Prohibition just raises profit margins, brings the law into disrepute generally, and makes the product or service riskier for the addict/consumer. Shunning by civil society is a more effective strategy to deal with vices.

    It’s true that Marxist dogma pertaining to marital relations was largely abandoned by a pragmatic Stalin, but the very high abortion rate that persisted right up to recent times speaks to something very rotten in Denmark.
    https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-failed-communist-experiment-with-free-love_2242535.html

    The Westerns nations are only nominally Christian, institutions becoming ever more secular from the French Revolution on. I think that’s evident in sexual mores, too. Note how traditional norms regarding marriage, divorce, abortion are regulated by rabbinical courts in Israel, with the State playing a subordinate role. Note also how strictly female modesty is policed within Orthodox communities. (Bottom line: In the West the vacuum left by the allegorical hair shirt, got filled by pussy hats and vagina monologues.) Incipient bull market in scapulae!

    Like

  33. NoddingHead
    March 3, 2018

    “Prohibition just raises profit margins, brings the law into disrepute generally…”

    I agree. It also greatly increased the power of Jews, who largely or entirely controlled the booze business especially after the 18th Amendment when legal alcohol businesses, many of which were run by northern European Goyim, were shut down, giving a gigantic advantage to the organized criminals. Maybe disrespect for law was the Jew’s most important accomplishment with the 18th Amendment. Either that or the huge profits it produced for them. Or making it a kind of fashionable thing to disregard the law and drink too much too often. And the goyim saw it all and decided “hey, them Joos ain’t so bad after all. They provide a good service bringing booze even when it is deemed unconstitutiinal and illegal. “Hooray for them Joos!”

    Revilo Oliver has a really good analysis of the 18th Amendament within his 1981 “America’s Decline: Education of a Conservative” is a great read, I highly recommend it. You can find the pdf as a free download, thankfully.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. NoddingHead
    March 3, 2018

    icareviews:
    “If Jews were in “absolute control” for 72 years, as you indicate, and essentially owned the country, then what would even be the point of privatizing their assets among themselves?

    Good point. Maybe it took about that long to completely emasculate the Whites of the country. All the old White grandparents who were have been alive back in the 1917-1925 era are dead, killed by the Cheka Jews. Nobody there even dared criticize the brutal, even sadistically anti-White Bolshevik regime anymore, much less call attention to the fact that Jews were entitelu responsible, by 1991. The population was at that point eager to join “The West”. Levi jeans, MacDonalds, Coca-Cola, freedom! The big experiment showed that Jewish private-bank-capitalism was a little better at providing consumer goods than was Jewish state-monopoly-capitalism.

    I can only speculate that the Jews gave up total control of the Soviet Union because they knew, by 1991, that their comrades also had complete control in the U.S. A lot more money to be made by taking a userer’s cut from people who think they are free to engage in “free market” entrepreneurship, than from a castrated and used-up people who have had their best and brightest silenced of killed for the past 72 years.

    Political correctness, cultural Marxism, the increasing negro worship of the saturation media, anti-white stuff in all movies, TV, advertising, etc.

    Like

    • icareviews
      March 3, 2018

      Again, I would discourage readers from buying into this sort of grand, overarching theory of totally dominant Jewish power. Jews have never had “complete control in the U.S.” – nor do Jews represent a single bloc of opinion in all circumstances. Look at U.S. policy toward Iran. If Jews have been in “complete control” all of these years, how come the Israel lobby’s had to keep crying for military intervention all of these years – and without success, thus far? How come they blew all those millions on talk radio ads scaremongering about a nuclear Iran and didn’t just order Obama to kill the deal? Clearly, they – to the extent that Jews can even be understood as a monolithic “they” – don’t always get what they want.

      Like

  35. NoddingHead
    March 5, 2018

    So basically you are saying “they are just like us”? I don’t buy it. I think Jews are far more racially aware and racially cohesive than are my white “volk”. We have been rather brilliantly divided along media-driven and superficial ideological points of contention.

    Like

    • icareviews
      March 5, 2018

      So basically you are saying Jews are the Borg from Star Trek?

      Like

  36. NoddingHead
    March 5, 2018

    I highly recommend to all Admiral Sir Barry Domvile’s short book “From Admiral to Cabin Boy” in its entirety. He was a lifelong warrior and patriot who rose through the ranks to become Admiralty Director of Plans for the Royal Navy and also head of British Naval Intelligence, a man with a lot of earned credibility and talent. His position allowed him to see a shitload of behind-the-scenes political stuff. He was imprisoned under Regulation 18B (Google that) for 3 years during WWII in “democratic and free” Great Britain, as were many other loyal British real patriots. He said things Jews didn’t like and so was jailed.

    Free download here:
    https://archive.org/details/DomvileBarryEdwardFromAdmiralToCabinBoy

    Like

  37. NoddingHead
    March 5, 2018

    “Life is so short and her books are so long. Don’t know if I’ll ever find the time for this legendarily self-impressed figure.”

    I was a devoted member of that line of thought once. Her writing was/is extremely powerful and persuasive and in my mid-late 20s I was able to read all of those long novels and nany of the shorter books. I would venture that a fairly large percentage of “alt-right” and non-self-hating Whites at one time were Ayn Rand “followers”, as weird as that sounds. We were all swindled.

    Like

  38. NoddingHead
    March 5, 2018

    We loved her because of her anti-communism and opposition to the “looters”. We were unaware then that such extreme individualism (was also at least as fatal to the White race as Jewish Bolshevism.

    Like

  39. NoddingHead
    March 6, 2018

    “So basically you are saying Jews are the Borg from Star Trek?”

    Not on purpose. Would that be overstating things way too much? I am not a big Star Trek fan so I can’t really say. Star Trek was the ultimate multi-cultural TV show in the 60s and very popular. I liked it. I suppose your point, and well taken, is that I was clumsily attempting to create some dumb strawman argument, putting “words in your mouth” for a reason that I can no longer remember, with my comment on March 5.

    Like

  40. NoddingHead
    March 13, 2018

    “Jews, like all minorities, appreciate lawful order…”

    I disagree. Jews like social chaos and they promote it non-stop.

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: