Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Change for Morons

How many of you voted for ‘change’ in the last election? I estimate it is about the same number of people who voted for ‘change’ when they voted for Obama (and Bush Jr, Clinton, Bush, Sr, etc, etc, etc). You all keep voting for ‘change’, yet what do you get?

You truly thought that thru every one of these lying bastards’ words spoken, that ‘change’ would come. That wars for Israel would stop. That the neocons and war hawks would be taken down.

At my personal blog I explained that Obama was simply a black Bush, that there was no real discernible difference except on the SJW areas of divide. In this past election, myself (and the excellent writers here at Aryan Skynet) took great amounts of time and effort to point out what is really easily discernible: that Trump doesn’t have an honest, principled bone in his body. That his entire life is a sham controlled and manipulated by jews.

The ones that argue against this point today are blithering idiots, too invested in the man and their own shtick that they can never admit how thoroughly wrong they were/are about this jew bag. But isn’t that the usual game? Invest yourself in a politician that ‘tells you what you want to hear’, then ignore every fact and data point that is contrary to your belief.

You poor, gullible, fools.

Not only will he follow every Israeli dictated instruction for war, every additional penny asked for from your tax dollar to give to those criminal usurpers in Palestine will be given (and more). America is Israel’s slut; willing to do anything to satisfy its master.

But worse will be the economic stance this king of bankruptcy brings with his jew controller, Jared Kushner. You see, they want to run this country like a business (it is a corporation, of course).

bizsale

When interviewed, Kushner said,

The government should be run like a great American company. Our hope is that we can achieve successes and efficiencies for our customers, who are the citizens.”

So, let me ask you Skynet followers (because this is the first question that comes to my mind): What is the main object for a corporation? To make as much money for its owners and stock holders as possible.

Don’t think that this is an insignificant point. Because YOU are not a stock holder or owner in this corporation. Bearing this in mind, who in the hell do you think will prosper keeping you as an American government ‘customer’, paying the bills?

Now, just because we seem to forget who the damned boss really is (duh, people, its us, the citizenry), we end up believing these assholes like Trump and his jew handler when they tell us stupid shit like this.

trump america 6W0j1qa53wno1_1280

Never an R or D Again!

Advertisements

About BMan

Never a Democrat or Republican again!

117 comments on “Change for Morons

  1. BMan
    June 24, 2017

    Reblogged this on B'Man's Revolt and commented:

    Aryan Skynet is my favorite blog away from home blog. Thanks for allowing me to post there!

    Liked by 2 people

  2. icareviews
    June 24, 2017

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  3. icareviews
    June 24, 2017

    Occidental Dissent’s Hunter Wallace has been level-headed about Trump all along. I think the Alt-Righters are gradually waking up, even though there will always be a few ardent adherents of the Kekist MAGA heresy who refuse to be swayed.

    Liked by 1 person

    • BMan
      June 24, 2017

      Let’s just say that Hunter Wallace had a change of heart. At first, he was all on board the Trump Train (I just don’t want to take the time to scroll back on his timeline to show you).

      I was very impressed with his quick realization and have given him kudos for it.

      Like

      • icareviews
        June 24, 2017

        He might have voiced some support for Trump, but he was never as cucked as the rest of the Alt-Right:

        http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2015/08/08/donald-trumps-jewish-ties/

        Like

      • Sam J.
        June 24, 2017

        Hunter always equated his support for Trump in “relation” to Hillary and the other cucks in the primaries.

        Even if Trump is a huge failure he still is light years above Hillary. He has changed a LOT of things in favor of Whites. No he hasn’t put the Jews in concentration camps, as I wish, but he’s done a lot of good. His trade policies while not triggered yet lean towards much better terms. Other countries are on notice that egregious trade deficits are a problem. He’s a big net positive no matter how controlled he is by the Jews.

        It appears to me that his super fast 160 degree change after the election was from the Jews showing him pictures of him and little girls or some other nefarious stuff he did. His demeanor got quite haggered looking around the time of peak Jew influence. I think over time he realized that if they outed him he could go after them also and also that they only had one shot at him. The Jews don’t have as much as they thought. The arrogance of the Jews will probably push a counteracting push by Trump over time. It did with Obama who did several things that were in our favor like not going to war with Iran and slowly making peace with them. I wouldn’t rule out Trump being a great win for Whites over time as he consolidates power he will have more and more leverage over the Jews as they are a evil crooked bunch that can easily be arrested.

        As for myself I’ve gone back and forth on Trump but now see him as a guy who really is a Patriot but is surrounded by Jews. Maybe he ran to puff up his own ego but…well who else would you get for President but people with big egos? I don’t believe he was a Jewish plant from the beginning. Not an agent of the Jews. Over time he’s going to despise the Jews as everyone that they think they can order around does. With two terms he could cause them some damage.

        Like

  4. Hipster Racist
    June 24, 2017

    Remember when Chris Rock said, “I hate niggers so much I wish they would let me join the Ku Klux Klan?”

    I have a similar sentiment: I hate corporations so much I wish they would let me join the Communist party. Maybe I’m “counter-signaling” capitalism and that makes me a “socialist” but frankly I don’t care. I never pretended to be a “right winger” anyway – I’m just a racist liberal. Liberals are the REAL racists, after all. I have no problem with a welfare state, universal health care, and other socialist policies. Those kinds of policies work well in a single-race state. It’s multi-racialism and multi-culturalism that makes people not want to contribute to the commons because, of course, groups are not equal so it’s always one race subsidizing another race, and no one wants to pay for free-riders that aren’t even of their own racial family.

    So I’m a racist, I want a Whites-only society, then we can have all the nice things and take care of the poor and have commons and worry about things that are more important than money. I don’t mind paying a little extra to subsidize the poor and needy – as long as it’s *our* poor and needy.

    Liked by 4 people

    • BMan
      June 24, 2017

      I, too, want a whites-only society, but we left that ideal long ago when our ancestors didn’t send the blacks back and then allowed more colored immigration go unfettered since the 60’s acts.

      I have been a long time proponent of some form of universal healthcare. But as more of these third worlders are forced among us (totally unable to support themselves), the less likely it will ever happen.

      Then, the more they feed the MIC, the less they have for any social assistance/help. Trump has fed that monster as much or more than anyone.

      My fear is that it is too far gone and the scales have shifted away from our desire of a white only society.

      Now what?

      Like

      • Rod Horner
        June 24, 2017

        >Now what?

        A nation of California.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 24, 2017

        It used to be that Americans helped themselves and their fellow citizens. Before the government and the professional cartels (AMA, etc.) usurped that role, that is.
        http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/322216?journalCode=ssr

        I can’t support any system where individuals aren’t at least partially responsible for their own health outcomes. Like, I’ve got to pay for the alcoholic’s liver transplant? Or bathhouse guy’s antiretroviral cocktail? No thanks!

        Liked by 1 person

      • eyeslevel
        June 25, 2017

        Now what? Now pro-whites win the propaganda war and take power.

        Like

    • Sam J.
      June 24, 2017

      “…I hate corporations so much I wish they would let me join the Communist party…”

      I’m with you. I’m a Nazi without the Dictatorship. Fuck that I want Representative government but I believe there should be limits. You should have to own property, maybe be married, have a certain income, be able to read at a 8th grade level, etc. I’m saying all of these are necessary but there should be some sort of laws on who can vote. I want someone with skin in the game to decide. It might be good to strike off the roles anyone who gets more than 50% of their income from the US government. Including if you work for a corporation that gets it”s income from the government.

      I would also say that any Corporation that gives money to politicians gives up their limited liability status. After all you are either a person or a corporation. A person doesn’t get some of the same tax breaks and limited liability that a Corporation does. We should give them a choice.

      Like

    • bob saffron
      June 24, 2017

      Limited liability and the corporate personhood are government-conferred franchises. I see no fairness in that privilege. And utilitarian arguments about “progress” leave me cold. Debts are very serious undertakings, as the coming generations are to find out.

      Help for the deserving poor, sure. But delivered judiciously and parsimoniously. Soup kitchens, for example, over money, too easily spent on booze, drugs, gambling etc..

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        June 24, 2017

        @bob saffron

        Arguing with libertarian ideologues is like arguing with religious people who believe in presuppositional apologetics, it’s just a complex form of begging the question. We’ve already gone round after round on what exactly “government” means and libertarians will just change the definition of “government” and “non-government” to suit whatever they are arguing at the time.

        Contra “liberals” like Steven Colbert, the problem isn’t that “corporations are people” – corporate personhood doesn’t even get to the root of the problem. Limited liability gets a bit closer, but I’d say the real problem is the fact that ownership of corporations is indirect and a highly developed market for corporate shares tends toward short term profitability goals – CEO chasing quarterly profits.

        But to go even further, it’s a problem with money itself, specifically, that money is fungible – meaning, essentially, you can steal it. Interestingly too, fungible money in the form of coinage is part of the “military–coinage–slave complex” phase of human societies:

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debt:_The_First_5000_Years

        But I’ll do you one better – my planned White Republic is perfectly compatible with libertarianism. It’s a perfectly voluntary system, no one is required to join us. We will own our real estate and if you aren’t an owner, you can’t enter our country. And part of the voluntary contract to join our Republic is that you are not allowed to bother anyone about “Austrian economics” ever. If you want to peddle Austrian economics, you can do so on your own private property outside of our White Republic. See? It’s completely voluntary. If anyone is born into our republic and they discover Austrian economics, they are free to get out.

        soup kitchens, for example, over money, too easily spent on booze, drugs, gambling etc..

        Just like totalitarians who want the blunt force of the state to fix all problems, libertarian ideologues want the blunt force of the market – based on fungible money, in other words wealth that is alienated from the community – to solve all social problems.

        Booze, gambling, and drugs are vices, and vices are sins, problems that the Church – i.e., civil society – is responsible for.

        Remember, all promoters of Austrian economics are free to leave our White Republic, and we’re upfront about banning Austrian economics, so there is no force or fraud. It’s all libertarianly-correct.

        Like

  5. Pingback: Change for Morons | Hipster Racist

  6. TinaRoper14
    June 24, 2017

    Reblogged this on A White Woman's Perspective.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Hipster Racist
    June 24, 2017

    People voted for Donald Trump to expel the illegals, build a wall, and bring back jobs.

    Instead, we’re getting Jeb Bush bullshit – “decreasing regulations” and cutting taxes for the rich – no wall, no deportations, no new factory jobs in the Midwest.

    Typical Republican cuckservative bullshit.

    Liked by 1 person

    • BMan
      June 24, 2017

      Yep.

      And while we all look at that right hand holding the Ace of Spades (expel the illegals, build a wall, and bring back jobs.), his left hand holds the Trump card which continues the money gobbling of the MIC, the expansion of the Empire/Eretz Israel, and the furtherance of jewish power over our lives while removing the last bits of wealth from us.

      Liked by 1 person

  8. Tom
    June 24, 2017

    Drumpf is nothing but an actor (actors are very good at pretending to be someone else), a face for the image of the “Trump” corporations.
    The reason why you will never see his TAX statement is because the fraud never has been and never will be worth 7 billion Dollars (in today’s fake money values).
    The same goes with other jewish faces that appeared out of nowhere with the claim of being fantastic businessmen who performed miracles in business (Zuckerberg, Branson and probably the richest plant of all time, Mr Bill (Climate Change) Gates.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Sam J.
    June 24, 2017

    I’ve said over and over that the Jews are a tribe of psychopaths. People have said,”meh”…

    Now we are beginning to get genetic data that proves they are.

    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2017/06/19/ashkepathy/

    “…Low-activity MAOA genes (2R and 3R) are associated with impulsive aggression and psychopathy….”

    “…The population, which has the highest frequency of the combination of the “worrier gene” (low-activity COMT (Met)) and the “warrior gene” (low-activity MAOA), as far as I could ascertain, is the Ashkenazi Jewish population…”

    “…The Hoaxin’ have on average a much higher incidence of both the genes which predispose to paranoia and the genes which predispose to psychopathy and aggression…”

    The Jews are a tribe of psychopaths. You can take it to the bank.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bob saffron
      June 24, 2017

      Interesting.

      Like

    • BMan
      June 25, 2017

      There must be scientific proof of what is glaringly obvious. (As long as the jews aren’t able to hide it)

      Like

  10. alexanderrados
    June 24, 2017

    There’s much to what you say in this article. At the end of the day, I still can’t shake the conviction that Planet Jew is wrong and The Reich Was Right!!

    Like

  11. Pingback: Change for Morons – Country Comfort.Canada

  12. alexanderrados
    June 24, 2017

    Reblogged this on alexanderrados.

    Like

  13. bob saffron
    June 24, 2017

    For anyone who still believes in the inherent goodness and viability of modern democracy:
    http://www.riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf

    Like

  14. bob saffron
    June 24, 2017

    I’m reading a book on Jewish militias and came across this early Zionist hero:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Trumpeldor

    “Zion Mule Corps”. Something for the GOP to think about.

    Like

  15. guest
    June 25, 2017

    But to be fair, Trump just got in, what did anyone expect really?

    The government is like an oil tanker with a giant turn radius, as in everything takes ages, especially when government agencies are in almost open revolt.

    Hell, Trump only had his first cabinet meeting two weeks ago!

    Personally i think he already delivered on the cultural side.
    The more foaming against him as the white proxy, the better.

    Anti Trumpers have now the same effect on normies as the BLM.

    That alone is priceless, the further polarization and taking sides.

    Liked by 2 people

    • BMan
      June 25, 2017

      The “anti-Trumpers” are anti for all the wrong reasons.

      As for what did anyone expect? You don’t read around here often, do you? I called this entire fiasco Aug 2015, as far as I know, before anyone else.

      I told people what to expect and it is happening almost exactly the way I said.

      And really, it was so easy to do (I am no psychic). All one has to understand is that they all lie and they all feed the jew beast.

      It really IS that simple.

      Liked by 1 person

      • guest
        June 25, 2017

        It’s far from a fiasco, summa summarum Trump is great memetically!

        Now people who body slam reporters get elected!
        Trump changed everything, to the better.
        The reign of cucks is over.

        But some people really expected Israel would stop blackmailing people because of Ivanka, or that AIPAC would disband, that of course was always a pipe dream.

        Democrats are also now openly anti-American, thanks to Trump, they have to double down on the crazy, and if because of that the Jim Webbs take over the party, everyone wins again. Hence it’s not a fiasco, Trump over delivered if anything, best half a year ever.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        June 25, 2017

        “…Democrats are also now openly anti-American, thanks to Trump, they have to double down on the crazy…”

        I agree with these sentiments. I saw a Drudge link that said now the Democrat’s are doing all they can to silence anyone who raises a peep about Trump/Russia. Probably because it was stupid nonsense and it just makes people madder than hell to have stupid nonsense IN THEIR FACE constantly. They have totally lowered the presses credibility even lower, if it were possible.

        Part of this is because the Jews run the press and “The Jews are a tribe of psychopaths”. The psychopaths are like machines and when the press had some credibility they could use mass repetition and it would sorta work. They’re machines so they don’t understand that the “emotional” landscape has changed. They’re not believed no matter how much they yell about Russia. Even of it were true no one would believe them now.

        Part of my, much repeated psychopathic mantra is,”…Psychopaths having no empathy themselves can only go by the feedback they get from the people they are exploiting. So they push and push to see what they can get away with. The normal people build up resentment towards them. Thinking “surely they will reform or repent” like a normal person who does wrong. Of course the Jews do not. They don’t have the mental process for reform. Then in a huge mass outpouring of hate for the Jews, fed up with the refusal to reform their behavior, they attack and/or deport them. In this stage of the cycle the Big/Rich Jews escape and the little Jews are attacked…”.

        They’ve overreached but don’t understand yet. I still see the stupid Hasbara quibbling over little bits and pieces of things I write not understanding that the time where they could say one little thing not covering everyone is not the same as negating an argument. Jews have done this a lot but people have caught on. It frustrating for them when you constantly point out their failures.

        Here’s an absolutely fabulous book on psychopaths and on how to deal with psychopaths. In here might be the beginnings of a strategy to deal with them. It’s my belief that once people are wakened to psychopaths and their various natures they begin to recognize them rather easily. Even if you don’t believe the Jews are a tribe of psychopaths the book is a great read by a computer programmer that has broken down psychopaths behavior into smaller steps in order to recognize them. You can buy a copy or download a free pdf copy at the link below of “The Psychopath Code” by Pieter Hintjens.

        http://hintjens.com/blog:_psychopaths

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 25, 2017

        Trump himself is a joke and a Jew tool. But the Trump phenomenon is implicitly – and very close to explicitly – white. So instead of leveraging explicit whiteness to help Trump, we should leverage Trump to help explicit whiteness.

        Liked by 1 person

      • McZOG
        June 27, 2017

        But the Trump phenomenon is implicitly – and very close to explicitly – white.

        And the Trump “phenomenon” is also implicitly – and very close to explicitly – Jewish in origin, which demonstrates the Jewish nature of “pro-white” identity politics. This isn’t surprising though, considering the fact that Jews have always been classified as “white” in all European diaspora societies, that everyone on planet earth currently views Jews as “white” and always will, and that a good case can also be made that Jews invented racial supremacy (cf. the Tanakh/Old Testament) and white supremacy (cf. the Hamitic myth) in the first place.

        Like

  16. BMan
    June 25, 2017

    To SamJ:

    As for myself I’ve gone back and forth on Trump but now see him as a guy who really is a Patriot but is surrounded by Jews. Maybe he ran to puff up his own ego but…well who else would you get for President but people with big egos? I don’t believe he was a Jewish plant from the beginning. Not an agent of the Jews.

    Seriously. Anyone that has paid the slightest amount of attention to Trump would have no choice but understand he is a tool of the jew. His entire life is being a jew tool. It really is that glaringly obvious.

    Like

    • Sam J.
      June 25, 2017

      You may be right. I’m not completely uninformed on this. You have to admit that people who hang around with Jews and are not one of them eventually begin to have serious problems with their defects. If this is the case then Trump could be dealing with the Jews but…not of them. A different thing.

      He has not bent over backwards totally to do what they want and is making progress towards not being so controlled by them. Very slowly but they’ve run the country for decades so time will be needed.

      I personally don’t see how you can look at what Trump has done and compare where would Hillary be at this stage and not declare some sort of victory. To not do so is despair and defeatism. There’s room for that if necessary but it’s not a good idea. The people who think worse is better I think are totally wrong because worse is worse and is no direct correlation to people waking up about the Jews. If things go to max worse people will have little time to do anything but survive.

      Liked by 1 person

      • barnyardboss
        June 26, 2017

        I agree, Sam- As a first year boomer, mid-IQ white, I became jew-aware decades ago. It was obvious Trump was a jew tool- yet he was literally the only reason to register again because I felt he would give us more time to keep prepping our progeny for the collapse of the USSA. The Hag would have been sending troops out on the wild hunt by now and bloody local civil wars would be on us already. Worse is Worse. Trump is in charge of keeping the shekel ghetto alive- keep buying more ammo while you can.

        Like

      • BMan
        June 28, 2017

        If one considers jew control of either candidate “victory”, you might be on to something.

        Personally, I can see that Trump is sucking jew balls. The fact that this is not very important to you shows me you still have some sort of faith in them and this imaginary jew fighter, Drumpf.

        Me. I can never trust another jew in control of this government or my life. You accept and embrace what you will.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        June 28, 2017

        “…The fact that this is not very important to you shows me you still have some sort of faith in them and this imaginary jew fighter, Drumpf.

        Me. I can never trust another jew in control of this government or my life. You accept and embrace what you will…”

        Your comments put lots and lots and lots of words in my mouth that I didn’t say. I’m not embracing anything. I do think Trump is miles ahead of Hillary. I do think he’s done some great things. The wall seems to be getting built. The Rapeugees are going to be slowed down. Aliens are being picked up and deported. The Supreme court seems to have a Conservative Justice.

        There seems to be, may not be completely true, a extremely sharp rise in catching people involved in sex trafficking.
        If he really is going after the low hanging fruit in the blackmail business then yes I guess you can say I’m hopeful. The Blackmail business is one of the chief powers of the Jews. Without it they are in big trouble. So I guess I’m a little hopeful.

        Don’t look a gift horse in the mouth. He’s so far seems on track to do a lot more for Whites than any President we’ve had since…well none of them have done anything since Regan put tariffs on the Japanese.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        June 30, 2017

        “…HOUSE PASSES ‘KATE’S LAW’…”

        More Trump goodness. We need to at celebrate the good things we get and not always assume the worst. Trump is so contradictory. He surrounds himself with Jews but at the same time picks little symbolic fights with them all the time. Stuff that most people wouldn’t notice but people like us and Jews see it as glaring pokes in the eye. The non celebration of the Holahoax, not moving the embassy to Jerusalem when he said he would, I can’t think of them all but there’s been a lot. One time a guy at a rally spook up about building 7 and Trump asked him if he was a conspiracist. When he was being man handled on the way to being thrown out Trump told them to take it easy,”He’s one of us”. That’s what he said I saw it.

        The thrashing of him in the news could still turn him against them. He knows who’s doing this. Hell, that he’s elected at all is an oddity. I say it’s not over yet. We don’t know. The Jews would be easy to roll up because of 9-11 and lots of Kiddie rape that’s on film somewhere. If I was in his place I would find those films and blackmail Congress to do what I damn well pleased which my case would be an all out assault on the Jews staying in this country.

        I do think they have something on him. Probably sex with underaged girls.

        Like

  17. Hipster Racist
    June 25, 2017

    A great example of why ideologues in general, and libertarian ideologues specifically, are poison to White Nationalism.

    The original complaint? Corporations put profits over racial solidarity. When that is pointed out, the very FIRST thing that a libertarian ideologues does:

    1. Shift blame away from corporations to “government” and quote a Jewish ideology to denounce democracy (meaning, white people having the right to vote.)

    2. Counter signal against White solidarity – White Nationalism – by bringing up individual moral concerns. “Oh, no, why should we help a white guy out if he’s an alcoholic or a fag?”

    So you see, the reflex is always the same: find some excuse why we can’t have simple racial solidarity, immediately defend the powerful (corporations) and attack the powerless (some poor alcoholic.)

    Christian ideologues do the same thing of course. Say we need a White Nation, and a Christian ideologue will immediately say, no, White nationalism isn’t enough, we also need religion.

    “Neo-Reaction/Dark Enlightenment” ideologues do the same, “no White Nationalism isn’t enough, we also have to have monarchy or anti-egalitarianism.”

    Bob Whitaker calls them “wordists” but I just call them ideologues. White nationalism, white solidarity, white anything ALWAYS has to come last, after libertarianism, religion, whatever ideological system they subscribe to.

    It’s textbook entryism.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 25, 2017

      Libertarian ideologues don’t care about race, at all. They would rather have a nation of “Based Black Guys” who don’t drink and aren’t fags than to have a Whites-only society.

      Anything and everything is put first, before race.

      Libertarianism is incompatible with White Nationalism and, in fact, exists precisely to prevent White Nationalism. It’s a Jewish ideology specifically designed to destroy White solidarity and to prevent Whites from acting in their own interests.

      Jewish libertarians have always done this same thing: preaching individualism and anti-social attitudes for Whites, while promoting collectivism and social cohesion for Jews.

      Like

      • Sam J.
        June 25, 2017

        I think their newest stupid ideology is attacking “Democracy”. Of course they never note that they were the fucks that ruined “Representative Democracy” by exclaiming that everyone with a room temperature should vote. Now that it’s having problems, and of course it did, then they’re saying dump the whole thing and get a King. Which of course they will bribe and blackmail to do their bidding. We don’t need a King we need poll taxes and/or literacy test.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 25, 2017

        @Sam J

        I don’t even think the NRx “King” stuff is serious. It started out as a thought experiment, but then the NRx types jumped on board as yet ANOTHER way to signal against White Nationalism.

        Icareviews wrote a really good article about this maybe two years ago. Just like libertarianism, NRx is a complex ideology that can be enticing to intelligent and introspective White men, and it interferes with their natural solidarity toward their race.

        We need those kind of White men to be leaders, but instead they get caught up in anti-social ideologies that always put race last.

        I really want to make this point: So say some white guy is an alcoholic. What is your first response?

        1. Fuck that guy I don’t want to pay for his health care!

        2. Why is some capitalist selling alcohol to alcoholics?

        3. We should have AA meetings at churches to help drunks get off the booze.

        Which is more in line with White solidarity?

        Like

      • Sam J.
        June 25, 2017

        “…I don’t even think the NRx “King” stuff is serious…”

        More “Jewdo” as opposed to judo. Filling peoples minds with nonsense. I have said many times at Alt-Right sites why can’t we go back to what we had before…crickets. They don’t want to discuss limited Representative Democracy.

        As for the Alcoholics. Not sure. Tax alcohol and use the funds to help Alcoholics???? They drink most of it anyways.

        Now that I’ve thought for a second the best path to taking care of alcoholics is to deport the Jews to Israel. Maybe this won’t help but it will sure do a lot of good. That’s my new go to policy prescription for all that ails us.

        Social security running out of money.
        Deport the Jews to Israel.

        Dindus attacking Whites.
        Deport the Jews to Israel.

        Diversity a problem.
        Deport the Jews to Israel.

        Whatever.
        Deport the Jews to Israel.

        Like

    • Sam J.
      June 25, 2017

      Why don’t these people who are always bleating about minorities or the “diversity” go where that shit resides, live there and leave the rest of us alone. I have begun to ask them that. It totally deflates their virtue signaling as they could easily do this without burdening everyone else with their half-assed ideas to make society great.

      Like

    • bob saffron
      June 26, 2017

      There’s a natural balance between individualism and collectivism. Man is not an island, etc..

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 26, 2017

        @bob saffron

        Sure, there’s a natural balance between individualism and collectivism. But that’s not the point. The point is libertarianism has become just another excuse why we can’t have White Nationalism. Conservativism, libertarianism, NRx, Christianity, the Constitution – all are simply used to interfere with White solidarity.

        It’s not even a matter of “free markets would be good for a White nation.” It’s become “you can’t have a White nation unless you can first justify it via an appeal to Libertarian ideology.”

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 26, 2017

        I don’t see the conflict between nationalism and libertarianism. Absent Affirmative Action and other anti-discrimination provisions, whites will naturally self-segregate. Birds of a feather…

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 26, 2017

        @bob saffron

        Maybe there isn’t a conflict between nationalism and libertarianism, but there is mostly certainly a conflict between libertarian religion and basic reality. If reality doesn’t match up with libertarian ideology, libertarian ideologues simply declare reality wrong in some way, redefine words, and move the goalposts.

        Like

  18. NoddingHead
    June 27, 2017

    Totally agree with Hipster. Can’t stand comment sections on most other “alt-right” web sites where most people still seem to be under the influence of “Austrian Economics”. Yes, seems to be a religious fealty. The giveaway for me is when they all laugh at global climate change as if it isn’t occurring due to human activity and can’t possibly be a problem. Physics is somehow for “leftists”. Dumb. Anyway, agree totally with Bman too. Excellent article.

    Want to share this song by Deadbolt. I enjoy their lyrics and sound. I don’t like a lot of newer music but did enjoy this.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sam J.
      June 28, 2017

      I like Deadbolt. I was amazed that anyone at all had ever heard of them.(World’s most dangerous band)

      Like

  19. NoddingHead
    June 27, 2017

    9/11 truth and human-caused climate change both have science on their sides. Don’t think for a minute that the msm provides coverage of climate change in an unbiased fashion. They slant coverage towards deniers, despite facts. Of course, they totally ignore 9/11 science. Another case of religion vis-a-vis “patriotism”.

    Like

    • BMan
      June 27, 2017

      Noddinghead:

      Thanks for the kind words. and thanks for the song above. I liked it.

      The one issue you bring up that I am not sold on is the global warming thing (although you called it climate change just above). I also do not see the slant on coverage you talk about towards deniers. I see the opposite (although I admit I watch very little TV).

      Frankly, if tax schemes are involved around a carbon issue, they are full of shit.

      But I have to ask: do you believe these main stream scientists? Or do you think there is a group of scientists (like with 911) that are pursuing truth and the global warming thing is truth? Physics does support the 911 scientists while the majority of scientists are silent or say 911 could happen in the way the narrative dictates. It is mainstream scientism that is the lie in that case.

      I find that fascinating simply because I don’t really believe anything from any of these sources.

      Like

  20. NoddingHead
    June 27, 2017

    Can’t stand fake truthers who at the same time as pretending to respect science and physics regarding 9/11, find a religious way (always Libertarian religion) to deny science and physics regarding human-caused climate change.

    Like

    • guest
      June 27, 2017

      But it is a scam, a guilt trip, secular existential fear.

      The sea levels didn’t rise, the poles didn’t melt, no widespread famine, no peak oil, there is more forest today than 100 years ago.

      Actually the average earthling is less likely to die today because of starvation, war or in a catastrophic natural event than he was even a couple decades ago.

      What do you think will happen when our governments start a war on climate change? Which unlike the war on poverty, cannot end even in theory. It will be like the war on terror, a blank check to justify almost everything, more taxes the least. EPA administrators will become like a priest class, no wonder they need 50k portraits made of themselves, they are holy, doing gods work, averting the climate apocalypse!

      What i dislike it most is, that it takes air from real environmental efforts.

      People eat an organic granola bar every now and then and think they’ve done their part, or if they drive a hybrid they are morally absolved of everything, hell they think they have some leftover absolution, and can act like assholes.

      That’s why many Toyota Prius drivers were such jerks, it was not just a stereotype, it was this effect.

      Like

      • Sam J.
        June 28, 2017

        The real threat is the Yellow Stone volcano blowing. It’s trembling because of all the tourist trampling over the ground there.

        Like

    • bob saffron
      June 28, 2017

      AGW is a scam. The IPCC models(!) exclude clouds and solar sunspots.

      Like

  21. NoddingHead
    June 27, 2017

    I think the money power, the big international banking interests, are fairly neutral regarding global warming. They are going to be able to rake in big $$ no matter what. Big solar, big wind, etc requires big bank loans to achieve production. Rooftop solar requires smaller debts, but many of them. Of course they love traditional fossil fuels too. As those resources become more and more scarce, and geologically deeper amd more expensive to produce, bigger loans are needed to finance exploration and production. Win-win for big bankers.

    Like

    • Sam J.
      June 28, 2017

      I believe, really, that global warming is some Jews plot. Not saying all. Some enterprising Jew saw that the energy market is by far the largest on the planet and got to thinking,”just how can I get a little piece of this”. So he gets the idea for global warming and carbon(energy) credits with a little of that money flow falling into his pocket with carbon credits. A minuscule tax on energy would reap billions. It seems that most “carbon credits” will be traded on the market like private bankers make money. Now this may sound so far fetched as to be foolish but I believe that the Jews are a tribe of psychopaths and psychopaths do stupid stuff like this all the time. Why? Because no one would think that anyone would do something so outrageous.

      Like

    • bob saffron
      June 28, 2017

      Shale oil has capped the price until the next Middle East war.

      Like

  22. NoddingHead
    June 27, 2017

    I think I am a “liberal racist” like HR. Fact-based, science-based, but not encumbered by either PC or Libertarian dogma.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bob saffron
      June 29, 2017

      Ignoring the activity of that large golden orb in the sky because it defies modeling show’s what a faith-based doctrine AGW really is. Actually, politicians now days tend to used “climate change” as it has been decades since the warming trend ceased, in defiance of their models (all 17? of them, I can’t remember).

      Like

    • bob saffron
      June 29, 2017

      I mean, a little humility is in order. We can’t even reliably measure sea-levels reliably.

      Like

  23. NoddingHead
    June 27, 2017

    Bankers, and politicians owned by bankers, of course always support (((humanitarian interventionism))). Big $$, new markets, destroy and rebuild with (((debt))). I was gobsmacked at the (((big media))) how they ALL so praised Trump when he launched those cruise missiles against Syria. The only positive (((big media))) coverage he had received since taking office.

    Like

    • McZOG
      June 27, 2017

      I was gobsmacked at the (((big media))) how they ALL so praised Trump when he launched those cruise missiles against Syria. The only positive (((big media))) coverage he had received since taking office.

      Why would you be gobsmacked at that? The one thing that unites all sectors of U.S. society (Jewish and gentile) is support for the AmericanEmpire.

      Like

  24. McZOG
    June 27, 2017

    C.I.A. Connections to White Nationalist Leaders and Alternative Media Figures
    https://imgur.com/a/Mh1RS

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 27, 2017

      McZOG I’m pretty damn jealous you didn’t include me on your chart. Please correct ASAP.

      Like

      • guest
        June 28, 2017

        We all know you work for Cyberdyne Systems.

        Liked by 1 person

  25. NoddingHead
    June 28, 2017

    Bman, thanks for the reply. You asked:
    “But I have to ask: do you believe these main stream scientists? Or do you think there is a group of scientists (like with 911) that are pursuing truth and the global warming thing is truth? ”

    I am a physical scientist (applied type, not academic). I do sometimes deal with full-on academics though. Although climate is not my specialty professionally, I have been closely following weather and climate since I was around 12 years old (i am 53). Human-caused global warming is real and backed up by shitloads of empirical data and also theory. It is a litmus test for me, like 9/11 truth. The msm likes division and controversy, so they give the ‘denier’ side far more coverage than it is worth. IMO.

    Like

  26. NoddingHead
    June 28, 2017

    Global warming really is a fact, and it really is mostly human-caused due to massive burning of fossil fuels. And I think we really should do something about it. Policy is the issue. But the fact of it is undeniable to me. Northern Europeans typically care about not fucking up their environment for the sake of short-term $$. Being “traditional” doesn’t include total reliance on oil, gas, or coal for energy. Those have only been used so incredibly intensively for the past 80-100 years or so. Funny too that “libertarians” who pretend to champion innovation, seem so eager to stifle newer energy technologies, even though they are so promising and their costs per unit energy have been declining so quickly due to innovations. I think a lot of “libertarians” are really just cheerleaders for status quo monopolies.

    Like

    • Sam J.
      June 28, 2017

      “…And I think we really should do something about it…”

      I don’t know if it’s real or not. I have read several reports that say it’s real but that there’s a limit to the amount of heat that can arise from it due to clouds being produced and by rising temperatures moving the spectorial signature higher allowing more heat to escape to space. I do know that we have next to no sunspots and in the past this has meant extreme cold. I also know it has been way hotter in the recent past, like 400AD or r so and we’re still here.

      I can’t remember the exact figures but for WAY less money we could fertilize the oceans to fix carbon with the byproduct of a massive fish catch and greatly increased food for all sea creatures. The cost would be astronomically less than taxing carbon.

      Like

    • guest
      June 28, 2017

      >Global warming really is a fact, and it really is mostly human-caused due to massive burning of fossil fuels.

      Wrong, it’s not fact, but it is a tenet of the progressive faith, like “diversity is our strength”.

      CO2 follows heat, not the other way around, and the only bad effect of CO2 is, that you’ll have to pay your gardener extra, because plants grow faster with more of it, it’s good for the environment actually, or do you hate trees?

      Something like the average planetary temperature can’t even be measured, at all, it’s abstractions, or voodoo, you want another layer of government because of voodoo?

      I’m here in the Balkans, where the Adriatic sea a few hundred years ago was frozen over, they re-routed trade routes over it, so were most rivers in Italy! Now Italy is a tourist destination, and they grow tropical fruit and veggies.

      That’s the natural span of change, and humanity has no influence over global climate trends, the next small ice age will not come sooner, or later, because of anything we do.

      It’s so funny when predictions of climate doom, are figures not even outside the statistical margins of error, John Kerry worries about 1 degree over 100 years.

      We already pay 20% “eco” tax on fuel, officially for Earth, but it’s just used to fill budget holes. Why not forgo the charade and just bill us for sinning?

      Forgive me my father for i have sinned, i was a bad progressive.

      Like

      • guest
        June 28, 2017

        Or to quote Jim:

        “Warmism is an updated and rebranded version of the old Mexican religion, demon worship. The priests announce that unless human sacrifices are made, the sun will cease to rise.

        And, guess what, this gives the priests a whole lot of influence over which people get sacrificed to sun god, and which people do not. Thus we find the priests of global warming involved in all sorts of highly lucrative schemes whereby carbon indulgences are sold, and subsidies handed out, with the result that certain priests of global warming get a whole lot of money, for example the carbon indulgences sold by Carbonscape.”

        He is of course hinting at traveling guilt salesman and high priest, Al Gore.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 29, 2017

        What’s worse, this carbon scam represents a drain from white to Third World nations, exempt from many of the imposts, regulations, and whence many of the “offset” schemes originate. Already raised are the (((banking))) aspect, with a healthy market in tradable carbon offsets, the technology entrepreneurs, and yet another layer of government to harass John Doe.

        Like

  27. NoddingHead
    June 28, 2017

    I think libertarianism has already been pretty well documented as a bunch of 1950s and 1960s bullshit that was always intended to support large, existing corporations anyway. Despite any rhetoric to the contrary.

    Like

  28. NoddingHead
    June 28, 2017

    To tell the truth I am a little sickened by so-called “libertarians” and other alt-right conservatives who dismiss global warming as a “hoax” ans who don’t think the environment is anything important. The politicians who tell you it is a “hoax” are almost always huge Israel suckpoops.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      June 29, 2017

      You’re starting with the error that carbon is a pollutant and therefore AGW “deniers” (non-believers) don’t care about the environment. That’s begging the question.

      Like

  29. NoddingHead
    June 28, 2017

    Go ahead look it up yourself. All US politicians who call global warming a “hoax” are alsp suckpoops for Israel.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      June 29, 2017

      Which US politicians of any seniority aren’t “suckpoops for Israel”? Sample-size risk there, ha ha.

      Like

  30. NoddingHead
    June 28, 2017

    The only US politicians who can’t be castigated as such were Dennis Kucinich and that really good black one, Cynthia McKinney. I wish we had aboit 100 more White politicians as ballsy and truthful as Cynthia McKinney, frankly.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bob saffron
      June 29, 2017

      Zero is a small sample size. I admire McKinney for her 9/11 truth, rather less for her scientific prowess.

      Like

  31. BMan
    June 29, 2017

    @ SamJ:

    Trump has tried to throw a few bones to the starving masses that want real change. That is called ‘lying’. If he happens to get something to stick, oh well. But don’t hold your breath when the same neocon jewish power structure still controls everything, including Trump (and always has).

    Comparing Trump to Hillary is a non-starter. I contend that TPTB never intended Hillary to be POTUS and that their Inside Man, Trump, was ALWAYS their intended sElector.

    Frankly, this has been obvious and I am still amazed there are people still falling for the shtick.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      June 29, 2017

      ♪Won’t get fooled again!♫♪

      Like

      • bob saffron
        June 29, 2017

        Great video, thanks. Doesn’t matter how many times I’ve seen his retinue, I’m still shocked.

        Like

    • bob saffron
      June 30, 2017

      Robert Mercer I can’t prove is a Jew, nor Rebekah, his daughter (though I’d like to know why that spelling).
      http://www.politico.com/story/2015/04/ted-cruz-woos-orthodox-jewish-voters-117013

      Like

    • Sam J.
      June 30, 2017

      I fully admit I could be wrong but I can only go by what I see. A lot of stuff Trump said in the elections he’s said for decades. It did seem as if Hillary threw the election.

      Like

      • BMan
        June 30, 2017

        The thing about politicians is that they say all sorts of stuff to get elected, but virtually none of them actually do what they say. I have witnessed every election since 1980 (and studied many more) and frankly, I can see that this point never changes.

        Just because Trump said shit for decades doesn’t mean the jew will allow any such thing to occur and if bad comes to worse, they tell him to change the narrative, in which he will gladly do.

        Think Syria and his seeming anti-neocon stance, which is now shown to be a bald faced lie.

        A bone here or there is enough for many, but for me I need to see massive change. Words are no longer enough. Menial wins are not enough.

        What is enough is stopping jewish power and control.

        Trump will NEVER do any such thing.

        Like

    • bob saffron
      July 3, 2017

      Video removed by (((YouTube))).

      Like

  32. bob saffron
    June 29, 2017

    An open question: The scores of Israeli “art students/vendors” swarming the country photographing government facilities – a pretty gross and clumsy way to gather intelligence I would have thought (not to mention risky, as their apprehension and deportation shows). Was that genuine scouting or merely to support the spying-on-Saudi-hijackers narrative as a fall-back position?

    Like

    • Sam J.
      June 30, 2017

      Maybe they were being obvious in order to tie up man power to look at them instead of what they were doing elsewhere. Like the movers and the guys in white vans going into the WTC at night after the cleaning staff left.

      Like

      • bob saffron
        June 30, 2017

        Yeah, it was so crass and obvious, especially as sayanim, let alone professional spies, aren’t exactly in short supply. I think you’re probably right.

        Mind you, the “dancing Israelis” certainly shows that even Mossad recruits can be pretty undisciplined and plain dumb, or overly confident.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        July 1, 2017

        @bob saffron

        “undisciplined and plain dumb, or overly confident.”

        It’s rather astonishing, but the “dynamic silence” of the broadcast media has always been extremely effective. The internet is changing that but it’s still virtually impossible to push something into the “mainstream narrative” if the “mainstream” doesn’t want it known.

        Consider the media treatment of Edward Snowden vs. William Binney.

        “William Binney who?”

        Exactly.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        July 1, 2017

        Thanks. Include me on the “Who?” list.

        Like

  33. bob saffron
    July 1, 2017

    The Assange outfit’s contribution to Trump’s victory was interesting. I can’t believe he isn’t sitting on a mountain of Trump dirt which will be dumped at an opportune moment.

    Like

  34. NoddingHead
    July 1, 2017

    Binney is a good example. I think the best example is big media either completely ignoring, or ridiculing, AE911. A large number of respected people are signatories. One of my college professors is a signatory. Also the highly respected Air Force guy who called bs on OK City. The idea that “someone would have talked” is bs. Many people have talked but what they say is ignored by the big media so normies will never hear about it.

    Like

  35. NoddingHead
    July 1, 2017

    Even if one of the main perpetrators of 9/11 or OK City “talked”, they would not likely be heard. At least not by the telescreen-watchers.

    Like

  36. NoddingHead
    July 1, 2017

    This makes me wonder, what percentage of the US white population is it even possible to awaken now? I suspect it is extremely small. Less than 1%. And maybe less than 0.5% in Europe where it is a crime for which one can be imprisoned for expressing belief in such opinions as commonly expressed here publicly? The reason I think I was able to become “awake” is that I was able to save enough money earlier to allow me to have an extended period where I could spend time looking into this stuff. Normies are trained so thoroughly to ignore such things and call it all “conspiracy theory”, and then laugh and go back to their telescreens.

    Like

  37. NoddingHead
    July 1, 2017

    Thanks for that video above, Bman. Good one.

    Like

  38. james
    July 1, 2017

    Sad.

    Like

  39. NoddingHead
    July 1, 2017

    Guest said:
    “Wrong, it’s not fact, but it is a tenet of the progressive faith, like “diversity is our strength”.

    No, you are wrong. It is a fact of science. Your cuckish fealty to the (((libertarian religion))) makes you unable to distinguish science and facts from political nonsense. The greenhouse effect was recognized i the 1800s.

    Don’t put words in my mouth regarding other unrelated topics such as ‘diversity is strength”.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      July 2, 2017

      [Offstage: Al Gore claps loudly.]

      Like

      • bob saffron
        July 2, 2017

        Can’t wait till phlogiston comes back in vogue.

        Like

  40. NoddingHead
    July 1, 2017

    Seriously. This planted cuck anti-energy-innovation, suck up to the statis quo monopoly shit needs to be purged. I know, it is pretty much everywhere in “the movement”. But it has got to stop. Now.

    Like

  41. NoddingHead
    July 2, 2017

    Otherwise it just looks the same as any other cuckservative group focused on providing intellectual cover for existing monopolies. But with explicit racism. Get rid of that baggage.

    Like

  42. bob saffron
    July 2, 2017

    In almost all instances “alternative energy” is sub-economic. It comes out of your pocket through subsidies. Existing monopolies are unfazed.

    Like

  43. NoddingHead
    July 4, 2017

    That’s right, we better just stick with incumbent energy technologies that were built up with massive subsidies over the last century. White people love pollution (wtf?).

    I recommend looking into the cost curves for the alternatives in the last 10 years. Compare those to the relatively static numbers for the big incumbent fossil fuel technologies. Anyway, pretty sure fossil fuels have somehow become a religious belief for conservatives (cucks imo). Good day.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      July 5, 2017

      You seem to be wandering off topic. You’re arguing that AGW is real and that it’s caused by CO2. First, temperatures have been sliding for about two decades now, with CO2 rising. Second, pollution is not germane, CO2 is a naturally occurring gas. Third, sunk costs are irrelevant, present costs are what counts in choosing energy sources. That costs have come down for alternatives is easily explained by economies of scale. Public subsidies and media brainwashing have increased demand for alternatives, and as supply has increased, costs have dropped.

      Anything but nuclear is expensive and inefficient vis-à-vis fossil fuels. If Western governments ignore this physical reality, they hand a competitive advantage to the Third World.

      Like

  44. NoddingHead
    July 4, 2017

    Repeating a theory I have expressed here previously….globalists, including major enviro organizations like the (((Sierra Club))) actually want the U.S. to be dependent on foreign energy sources (as well as other minerals). Back in the 80s certain leaders of big enviro were solidly against massive third-world immigration also. Look up Richard Lamm, former Colorado governor and Sierra Club guy. Those intelligent policies have been cast aside. The religious fossil-fuel conservatives also serve the same globalist agenda, imo.
    https://mobile.nytimes.com/2004/03/16/us/bitter-division-for-sierra-club-on-immigration.html

    Like

  45. NoddingHead
    July 4, 2017

    From the NYT link…..
    “For starters, the executive director of the club, Carl Pope, said that Mr. Lamm’s supporters were ”in bed with racists.””

    Like

  46. NoddingHead
    July 4, 2017

    I am really starting to agree with Hipster now that the dumbest white Americans are the Republicans (cuckservatives, really).

    Like

    • bob saffron
      July 5, 2017

      The Sierra Club changed its immigration policy after a big donation from a Jew, nothing to do with AGW.

      Like

  47. NoddingHead
    July 7, 2017

    Exactly.

    Like

  48. Jimmy
    July 8, 2017

    No matter who you vote for, the government gets in.

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on June 24, 2017 by .
%d bloggers like this: