Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Clinton, Pollard, Lewinsky, Tripp, and the Zionist Spider Web

Bill Clinton’s relationship with “the Jews” was a complex one during the nineties and resists easy classification. His affinity for the globalizing and financializing tendencies of these years is well-known; but the president’s relationship with the Israel lobby was more problematic. “Perhaps the most ambitious, and certainly one of the most remarkable examples of coercion,” writes John Hughes-Wilson in The Secret State, was “the astonishing attempt by Israel to blackmail Bill Clinton, the President of the most powerful country on earth, the United States.”1 “The trap closed in October 1998, when Clinton called the Wye River Summit with Benjamin Netanyahu (replacing the assassinated Yitzak Rabin) plus Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat, in an attempt to keep the doomed Oslo peace process alive,” Hughes-Wilson reveals:

In the margins of this high-level summitry Netanyahu quietly dropped his bombshell: he informed a startled Bill Clinton that the Israelis had hard evidence from White House phone-taps that the President had had a sexual relationship with Monica Lewinsky. Despite the President’s very public TV denials to the American people that, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman,” Netanyahu knew that Clinton was lying. Moreover, he could prove it, and openly threatened to expose him with incriminating tapes, which Mossad had collected. In return for keeping his mouth shut, the Israeli Prime Minister demanded the release of Jonathan Pollard, an American Jew who had spied for Israel. This was blackmail and an attempt at compromise at the very highest level. […]

The Israelis, who take great pride in always bringing their boys home, lobbied hard for Pollard’s release, without result. It took until 1998 for Netanyahu to admit that Pollard was an Israeli agent. Next Netanyahu demanded his release, and followed this up with his threat to blackmail the President.

Clinton Lewinsky

Monica Lewinsky enters her tongue into evidence.

However, when a worried Clinton quietly brought Israel’s demand for Pollard’s release to the Director of the CIA, George Tenet, he “blew his top”, angrily pointing out that Pollard had sold classified information to South Africa and Pakistan as well as Israel and threatened to resign on the spot should Clinton cave in and release the convicted traitor.

The entire US intelligence community threatened to rebel if Pollard was released to keep the Israelis and the Jewish lobby happy. The result was that the Lewinsky affair eventually petered out after the story came out anyway and was followed by an attempt to impeach President Clinton for perjury. That failed, thanks to plentiful Jewish bribes on Capitol Hill and dark threats to expose several well-known Republican Senators who, like the randy Bill Clinton, just couldn’t keep their flies zipped.

Clinton ultimately declined the Israeli request to release Pollard, since when the government of Israel and their well-funded and numerous mouthpieces in the US have lobbied hard for a pardon, claiming that a convicted spy is really a martyr and a loyal Jew – as if that somehow makes the traitor’s crimes against America and betrayal no crime at all.2

As Hughes-Wilson’s “Jewish bribes” reference suggests, there were other Jewish interests, perhaps even more powerful than the Israel lobby, that worked at cross-purposes with the Likud faction led by Netanyahu and favored Clinton’s continuation in the Oval Office.

Gordon Thomas gives a somewhat different account in his book Gideon’s Spies. “In Tel Aviv,” he writes, “Mossad’s strategies [sic] pondered how to use the highly embarrassing taped conversations; they were the stuff of blackmail – though no one suggested any attempt should be made to blackmail the president of the United States.” Aryan Skynet leaves to readers’ judgment the question of whether such scrupulousness is characteristic of Israeli intelligence. “Some, however,” Thomas adds vaguely, “saw the recordings as a potent weapon to be used if Israel found itself with its back to the wall in the Middle East and unable to count on Clinton’s support.”3 Is it possible that this “potent weapon” would be deployed, not simply to assist an Israel “with its back to the wall”, but in an effort to initiate a superfluous war in the Jewish state’s interest?

Clinton’s relationship with the Zionists, initially more hospitable, had soured somewhat over the course of his presidency. As Michael Collins Piper theorizes, this was in part due to Clinton’s handling of the Oklahoma City bombing case and his resistance to lobbying efforts for an Iraq invasion at that time:

My theory was that, while, yes, indeed, the United States government was very much involved in covering up the truth about Oklahoma City, the reason why the Clinton administration and his Justice Department and the FBI were so adamant in trying to do this was because, in my opinion, and I think it’s an informed opinion […] it was because they realized that this attack in Oklahoma City was not the work of homegrown terrorists […] but, in fact, it was a conspiracy hatched abroad, specifically by the government of Israel, and the purpose of the conspiracy […] was ultimately what was achieved after 9/11; but I think that the Clinton administration, which had been resisting strong pressures from the neoconservatives to invade Iraq […] didn’t want to go to war against Saddam Hussein, and therefore it was part of their program to limit the investigation, limit the inquiry into who Timothy McVeigh was, who he was dealing with, and just try to limit it to Tim McVeigh and Terry Nichols […] but, if anything, in this particular case, and I know I’ll upset a lot of people by saying this […] I think the U.S. government actually did the American people a service and kept us from becoming involved in the endless wars of Israel in the Middle East […]4

Liddy

Paula Jones is pictured with Watergate burglar and conservative talk radio personality G. Gordon Liddy, who accused Clinton of engaging in “quid pro blow”. Jones brought the sexual harassment lawsuit that spiraled into the 1998 impeachment proceedings.

This ploy, if Piper is indeed correct as to how the Oklahoma City bombing was utilized, was unsuccessful in achieving its aims. Coming to the Zionists’ aid, however, was Clinton’s involvement with a White House intern named Monica Lewinsky. After Newsweek squashed plans to publish reporter Michael Isikoff’s exposé on the subject, Matt Drudge broke the story through a communications novelty known as the “World Wide Web” on January 17th, 1998. Mossad, however, had long been aware of the Lewinsky affair – and so had Hollywood. The “eerily prescient” Wag the Dog had its premiere exactly a month before, on December 17th, 1997, going into wide release on January 9th, more than a week before The Drudge Report broke open Monicagate. The movie had been in preproduction in 1996, months before Tripp began recording Lewinsky calls. The film’s director, Barry Levinson, was furthermore in something of a rush to get the movie made, as Variety reported at the time:

Clinton Mamet

David Mamet – mockingly? – sports a beret.

Barry Levinson is close to agreeing to direct Dustin Hoffman and Robert De Niro in Wag the Dog, a David Mamet-scripted drama for New Line, sources said.

The film will be produced by Jane Rosenthal, president of Tribeca Productions, and is a co-production between Tribeca, Hoffman’s Punch Prods. and Levinson’s Baltimore Pictures. […]

Although the deal isn’t completed, Wag the Dog is expected to be Levinson’s next film, with a Jan. 13 [1997] start date. He was to have directed the big-budget adaptation of Michael Crichton’s underwater novel Sphere, with Hoffman and Andre Braugher. That film’s fall start was pushed back to March by Levinson […]

In the meantime, Levinson’s enthusiasm for Wag was bolstered by a recent all-star cast reading at the Peninsula Hotel, overseen by Rosenthal. Levinson received permission last week from reluctant Warner Bros. executives to slip the film in. He’ll try to shoot the pic in less than 30 days, then jump almost immediately back into Sphere.5

Levinson poses as a liberal – claiming, for instance, to be “appalled” by Israeli treatment of Palestinians6 – but screenwriter David Mamet has made no secret of his brutal and uncompromising commitment to Zionist militancy. Haaretz describes him as “a neoconservative fighter who is out to shatter the ‘dogma’ of the liberal left and defends Israel aggressively.” Regarding the “Iranian nuclear threat”, Mamet “likened the West’s attitude toward Israel to the sacrifice of Isaac, to the ancient rite of sacrificing the beloved son in order to appease the wrath of the gods.” More specifically, the playwright “attributes to the American left an approach that rejects Israel’s existence and wishes to hand the country over to the Arabs, who want to liquidate it.”7 The source material for Wag the Dog is supposed to have been Larry Beinhart’s 1993 novel American Hero, which, however, is concerned with Operation Desert Storm and President George H.W. Bush’s reelection – not Bill Clinton and a girl in a beret8. One is left to speculate where Mamet and his collaborators got the inspiration to spice up Wag the Dog with such predictive specificity.

Randy Laist, in his book Cinema of Simulation: Hyperreal Hollywood in the Long 1990s, explains the way in which the movie exacerbated public perceptions of the Clinton administration’s disingenuousness:

Wag the Dog [is] a movie about a presidency derailed by an affair with a younger woman […] As if the timing of the film’s anticipation of the real scandal were not compelling enough, when Wag the Dog shows a brief video clip of the president with the girl, the fictional footage is strikingly reminiscent, or pre-miniscent, of the now-famous video tape of Clinton greeting Lewinsky in a rope line. In both the movie video and the news video, the president leans in to embrace the girl, and in both versions, the girl is clad in a memorable dark beret. Later that summer, when Clinton ordered cruise missiles to bomb sites in Afghanistan and Sudan in retaliation for acts of terrorism committed by individuals allegedly harbored by the governments of these countries, it was inevitable that he would be accused of wagging the dog […]9

Indeed, this is the way in which some commentators approached their coverage of the opening volleys in the looming “War on Terror”. “Secretary of Defense William Cohen was asked by reporters yesterday if the administration was trying to hand the country a ‘Wag the Dog’ scenario,” SFGate reported on August 21st, 1998.

Cohen flat-out denied it, but the moment was unprecedented.

In the midst of justifying a military action, a member of the president’s Cabinet was being asked if the government might not be stealing material from Hollywood. […]

In the movie, the timing of the attack couldn’t have been better, but yesterday’s timing rivals it. Without the attack, the lead story on every news broadcast last night – and every newspaper this morning – would have been Monica Lewinsky’s reappearance before independent counsel Kenneth Starr’s grand jury. The military action came on the very day that Lewinsky was expected to dispute details of the president’s grand jury testimony.

But there’s no connection between a fictional film and the bloody realities of the past week, said the movie’s executive producer, Claire Rudnick Polstein.10

Clinton eventually caved and launched a “degrading” series of bombings of Iraq (dubbed Operation Desert Fox – a sly reference to Lewinsky?)11 in December 1998 which, conveniently enough, coincided with the impeachment hearings resulting from the investigation of Kenneth Starr, who – it may or may not be relevant to note – later joined Israel booster Alan Dershowitz as defense counsel for infamous character Jeffrey Epstein12.

Another potential Israeli use for the Lewinsky tapes, Gordon Thomas indicates, involved a sensitively placed Mossad agent in the White House, codenamed Mega:

[…] the FBI had begun to explore the role Mega could have had in the way Jonathan Pollard had been run. Had Mega been the source for some of the ultrasecret material Pollard had passed on? The FBI had recently interviewed Pollard in prison and he had admitted that even his high security clearance had not been enough to obtain some of the documents his handler, the funereal [Yosef] Yagur, had requested. The FBI knew such documents had a special code word through which they had to be accessed, which changed frequently, sometimes even on a daily basis. Yet Yagur had seemed to know the code within a matter of hours to give to Pollard. Had Mega provided it? […]

There was a common consensus that the FBI must also be aware of the conversations between Clinton and Lewinsky. Some strategists urged [Mossad chief Danny] Yatom to use “the back-door channel” with Washington and let the FBI know Mossad was aware of the president’s phone calls: it would be a not-very-subtle way of telling the agency to back off in their continuing hunt for Mega. Other analysts urged a wait-and-see policy, arguing that the information would remain explosive whenever it was released. That view prevailed.13

When Drudge eventually broke the Lewinsky drama, its timing and ethnic flavor prompted Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan to suggest yet another use for the scandal during a 1998 appearance on Meet the Press. “I look at Lucianne Goldberg, Linda Tripp, and Monica Lewinsky, and I ask myself, ‘Why was this introduced at this time when [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu was being pressured by the president to give up more land on the West Bank?’”14 Tripp, a Pentagon employee who had previously worked for Army Intelligence15, was encouraged by literary agent Lucianne Goldberg, to whom she was introduced by Tony Snow of Fox News16, to secretly record conversations with Lewinsky.

Clinton Goldberg Drudge

Lucianne Goldberg with rising star Matt Drudge

Goldberg (née Steinberger) is an interesting character in her own right. She worked at The Washington Post as a teenager, caught on with the Democratic National Committee, and allegedly boasted at one time of having had an affair with Israel-friendly commander-in-chief Lyndon Johnson17. She married Sidney Goldberg, an editor with the North American Newspaper Alliance, which, according to Gene Lyons and Joe Conason, “was exposed as a media conduit for the Central Intelligence Agency.”18 In 1972, Goldberg worked undercover for the Nixon reelection campaign, insinuating herself into the McGovern milieu with the purpose of learning “sexy” details of “who is sleeping with whom and things like that.”19

Linda Tripp, interestingly, was not the only controversial figure with whom Goldberg would involve herself in her capacity as a literary agent. She also represented “white supremacist” neo-Nazi-connected LAPD officer Mark Fuhrman, whose strange media success caused Michael Collins Piper to wonder aloud whether Fuhrman was not an LAPD liaison of the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith20. (The ADL has been known to ensconce its agents with various “right-wing” groups. In a notorious instance, ADL spy Roy Bullock, who had a “long history of working closely with police departments” in California, was revealed to have infiltrated dozens of political organizations21 – a case discussed at length by Piper in his book The Judas Goats22.)

Tripp, during her time at the White House, worked under attorneys Bernard Nussbaum and Vincent Foster. Nussbaum resigned after advising Clinton not to allow an independent counsel investigation of Whitewater. It is interesting to note, however, that at the time of Starr’s appointment, one of the objections raised by the Clinton administration’s conservative critics was that the new independent counsel had “past lawyerly associations” with Nussbaum23 – who, it is also very interesting to observe, had a history of lobbying against Iraq on behalf of the Zionist state24 and later represented Larry Silverstein in his insurance litigation following the World Trade Center attacks in addition to petitioning President Obama to commute Jonathan Pollard’s prison sentence25. Tripp, however, seems to have had a falling out with Nussbaum, who had recommended attorney Kirby Behr to her, Salon’s Jeff Stein reports in an article dimly illuminating the murky chaos of the series of events and calling the nature of Nussbaum’s relationship with Tripp into question:

Clinton Nussbaum

Bernard Nussbaum

Tripp’s first lawyer was Kirby Behr, who Goldberg said had a “hissy fit” when another lawyer showed up in his office last January, announced he was Tripp’s new counsel and demanded the tapes. “He ran around the office screaming and said, ‘How do I know you’re not a criminal?’ and ‘Your client is a wack-job’” […]

Tripp fired Behr because he was a friend of former White House counsel Bernard Nussbaum, who had recommended Behr to her, Goldberg said. “That made Linda very uncomfortable.” But the end came when Tripp showed up at Behr’s office with a tape of Lewinsky implicating President Clinton’s friend Vernon Jordan in the affair.

“Behr went ballistic and said, ‘I’m calling Bob Bennett right now,’” Goldberg recalled. Bennett was – and still is – Clinton’s personal lawyer. Tripp, according to Goldberg, said coolly: “I don’t think so.” Behr was gone, but nobody knew how many tapes he might have copied.

Next to represent her was James Moody, a former analyst for the Central Intelligence Agency whom Goldberg recommended. Tripp soon replaced him, too, but not before he had made his own copies of the tapes. “Jim Moody did a lot of copying and didn’t tell her,” Goldberg charged. “She fired him because he’s a loon. And he was too much of a player with the media.”26

Complicating matters is the fact that Nussbaum, in addition to serving as Clinton’s counsel, also worked with the law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, one of whose attorneys, George Conway, entertained a “low view of President Clinton” and according to The New York Times was the person who recommended Jim Moody to Linda Tripp. “As it turns out, some of the most serious damage to Bill Clinton’s presidency came not from his high-profile political enemies but from a small secret clique of lawyers […] who share a deep antipathy toward the President, according to nearly two dozen interviews and recently filed court documents,” Don Van Natta and Jill Abramson reported in 1999. “While cloaking their roles, the lawyers were deeply involved – to an extent not previously known – for nearly five years in the Paula Jones sexual misconduct lawsuit. They then helped push the case into the criminal arena and into the office of the independent counsel, Kenneth W. Starr.” The Conway group’s leader, Van Natta and Abramson claim, “was Jerome M. Marcus, a 39-year-old associate at the Philadelphia law firm of Berger & Montague, whose partners are major contributors to the Democratic Party.” Marcus “helped arrange for Mrs. Tripp to take her explosive allegations to Starr.”27 Berger & Montague’s website also boasts of the firm’s litigations against Swiss banks and German businesses on behalf of “Holocaust” survivors28.

Al Gore’s potential function in the Clinton impeachment affair may also warrant scrutiny. “The fact that Vice President Al Gore had been favorably inclined toward Likud, Netanyahu’s party, led some to think that the impeachment of Clinton would benefit the Israeli hardliners – another clear sign of conspiracy” among Arab observers, writes Marjorie Garber29. “On the day Mr. Gore formally declared his candidacy in June 1999,” The New York Times reported, “ABC News broadcast an interview with the vice president in which Mr. Gore repeatedly distanced himself from the president, voicing disappointment over Mr. Clinton’s behavior with Monica S. Lewinsky, the White House intern with whom he had an affair.”30 Was this distance merely political expediency – or did something more substantial divide them? Given, too, the fact that Zionist stalwart Joseph Lieberman would join Gore on the presidential ticket in 2000, one is left to wonder whether the whole “War on Terror” debacle might not have played out in much the same fashion even if Bush had not “won” the election.

Rainer Chlodwig von K.

Endnotes

  1. Hughes-Wilson, John. The Secret State: A History of Intelligence and Espionage. New York, NY: Pegasus Books, 2017, p. 93.
  2. Ibid., pp. 95-99.
  3. Thomas, Gordon. Gideon’s Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad. New York, NY: Thomas Dunne Books, 2007, p. 104.
  4. Piper, Michael Collins. “The Piper Report – Special Re Broadcast” (April 20, 2011): https://michaelcollinspiper.podbean.com/e/the-piper-report-special-re-broadcast/
  5. Fleming, Michael. “Wag Snags Levinson in Sphere Time”. Variety (December 2, 1996): http://variety.com/1996/voices/columns/wag-snags-levinson-in-sphere-time-1117466240/
  6. Levinson, Barry. “The Israeli-Palestinian War: Which Channel to Watch?” The Huffington Post (September 20, 2014): http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barry-levinson/the-israelipalestinian-wa_b_5607603.html
  7. Benn, Aluf. “An Interview with David Mamet on Israel and Zionism”. Haaretz (January 13, 2012): http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/an-interview-with-david-mamet-on-israel-and-zionism-1.407117
  8. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wag_the_Dog_(novel)
  9. Laist, Randy. Cinema of Simulation: Hyperreal Hollywood in the Long 1990s. New York, NY: Bloomsbury, 2016, p. 94.
  10. LaSalle, Mick. “With Coincidences, Wag the Dog Takes on Life of Its Own”. SFGate (August 21, 1998): http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/With-Coincidences-Wag-the-Dog-Takes-on-Life-of-2995475.php
  11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Iraq_(1998)
  12. Aitken, Lee; and Conchita Sarnoff. “Jeffrey Epstein: How the Hedge Fund Mogul Pedophile Got Off Easy”. The Daily Beast (March 25, 2011): http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/03/25/jeffrey-epstein-how-the-billionaire-pedophile-got-off-easy
  13. Thomas, Gordon. Gideon’s Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad. New York, NY: Thomas Dunne Books, 2007, pp. 101-104.
  14. Goldberg, Robert Alan. Enemies Within: The Culture of Conspiracy in Modern America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001, p. 186.
  15. Chaitkin, Anton. “New ‘Pentagon Papers’ Show Linda Tripp Was a High-Level Mole”. Executive Intelligence Review (July 17, 1998), pp. 74-75.
  16. “Right-Wing ‘Dirty Tricks’ and the Clinton Scandal”. World Socialist Website (January 26, 1998): http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/1998/01/tric-j26.html
  17. Smith, Liz. “An Affair to Remember? / Goldberg Upset over LBJ Rumors”. SFGate (January 12, 2000): http://www.sfgate.com/entertainment/article/An-Affair-to-Remember-Goldberg-upset-over-LBJ-2784391.php
  18. Lyons, Gene; and Joe Conason. The Hunting of the President: The Ten-Year Campaign to Destroy Bill and Hillary Clinton. New York, NY: Thomas Dunne Books, 2000, p. 326.
  19. “Writer Declares She Was G.O.P. Spy in M’Govern Camp”. The New York Times (August 19, 1973), p. 1.
  20. https://archive.org/details/the-piper-report-2006/2006-04-20+-+The+Piper+Report.mp3
  21. Paddock, Richard C. “Infiltrated 30 Groups, ADL Figure Says: Spying: Roy Bullock Admits Selling Information to South Africa Was Wrong, But Insists He Never Acted Dishonestly”. Los Angeles Times (April 21, 1993): http://articles.latimes.com/1993-04-21/news/mn-25487_1_south-africa
  22. Piper, Michael Collins. The Judas Goats – The Enemy Within: The Shocking Never-Before-Told Story of the Infiltration and Subversion of the American Nationalist Movement. Washington, DC: American Free Press, 2006, pp. 119-142.
  23. Page, Clarence. “The Not-So-Impartial Kenneth Starr”. Chicago Tribune (August 14, 1994): http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1994-08-14/news/9408140142_1_bernard-nussbaum-fiske-white-house-counsel
  24. Rogers, David. “Pro-Israel Lobbyists Quietly Backed Resolution Allowing Bush to Commit U.S. Troops to Combat”. The Wall Street Journal (January 28, 1991): https://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/aipac3.htm
  25. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Nussbaum
  26. Stein, Jeff. “Starr vs. Tripp”. Salon (September 25, 1998): http://www.salon.com/1998/09/25/news_116/
  27. Van Natta, Don; and Jill Abramson. “Quietly, Team of Lawyers Who Disliked Clinton Kept Jones Case Alive”. The New York Times (January 24, 1999): https://partners.nytimes.com/library/politics/012499jones-lawyers.html
  28. http://www.bergermontague.com/about-us/history
  29. Garber, Marjorie. Quotation Marks. New York, NY: Routledge, 2016, p. 138.
  30. Hennenberger, Melinda; and Don Van Natta. “Once Close to Clinton, Gore Keeps a Distance”. The New York Times (October 20, 2000): http://www.nytimes.com/2000/10/20/us/once-close-to-clinton-gore-keeps-a-distance.html
Advertisements

About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

32 comments on “Clinton, Pollard, Lewinsky, Tripp, and the Zionist Spider Web

  1. icareviews
    May 28, 2017

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  2. Pingback: Clinton, Pollard, Lewinsky, Tripp, and the Zionist Spider Web | Hipster Racist

  3. A Zobbo
    May 28, 2017

    Brilliant, you guys at AS are an inexhaustible source of information.

    Liked by 4 people

    • icareviews
      May 28, 2017

      Thanks. I’ve been taking vitamins to increase the potency of my venom.

      Like

      • A Zobbo
        May 28, 2017

        You’re welcome. I wish we find out how to turn this venom of us into an antidote. If we do we win.

        Like

      • A Zobbo
        May 28, 2017

        “I wish we find out how to turn this venom of us into an antidote. If we do we win.”

        Just wishful thinking unfortunately.
        Would sound a tad pretentious if I claimed it was a clar project, wouldn’t it ?

        Like

  4. Sam J.
    May 29, 2017

    Let’s make sure we know what we’re dealing with. Left unsaid was that there is no doubt at all that there were explosives in Oklahoma city tied to the concrete columns. This was proven by Brigadier Gen. Bentin K. Partin, USAF the person formally responsible for bomb development and research. He does simple bomb blast pressure assessments that prove the pressure was no where even close to that needed to destroy the buildings columns and sent the report to lots of Congressman if not all. The video tapes of the explosion disappeared. Witnesses that claimed to have seen or heard more than one explosion were intimidated and in at least one case appear to have bee killed. On and on. McVeigh was known to have hung out at Elohim City with a German Nazi…that spoke Hebrew. Can’t make this stuff up it’s so weird. There is a video tape made by accident of McVeigh when he was supposed have been put of the military where he was actually in uniform on a military base.

    It isn’t unreasonable to assume that Ok city was a false flag.

    The WTC 1993 bombing is the same. The FBI was monitoring the bombers the whole time with a inside Man. He was first told that the explosives provided were to be inert but it was actually the real thing. There’s video’s of them mixing the stuff. The whole thing would have been concealed but the inside guy realized the whole set up was flaky and recorded just about all of his conversations with the FBI and how they were using real explosives. They were going to charge him with the act but were ruined when he came up with the audio tapes and documents showing the FBI was in charge of the operation. They had to let him go. The FBI’s excuse on why they let the bombing occur even though they knew there was real explosives in the van, the lost track of it. Well even a complete idiot could have said that all they needed to do was call the WTC and tell them that a white van that had explosives in it was headed that way.

    Lies, lies, lies, lies.

    The only thing good about this all of them can still be charged. All this shit they’ve been doing can not be discharged. It’s treason and murder and as soon as they lose power they can be raped. The blackmailers have very deep flaws that can be exploited.

    Like

    • Sam J.
      May 29, 2017

      Sorry forgot a link.

      Bomb Damage Analysis of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building by Brigadier Gen. Bentin K. Partin, USAF (Ret.)

      http://physics911.net/generalpartinreport/

      Like

      • bob saffron
        May 29, 2017

        @ Sam:
        You might be interested in a couple of incidents in Argentina that preceded the OKC bombing and which shared many of its dynamics.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sam J.
        May 30, 2017

        I heard of these but haven’t looked into them too much. I know the Argentinians stated plainly that it was a false flag unlike our lackeys that bleat whatever the Jews tell them.

        The thing is most of these things are not even done very well. They use control of the State to hide their crimes.

        Like

    • Sam J.
      May 29, 2017

      One more that’s helpful.

      Like

    • icareviews
      May 29, 2017

      “It’s treason and murder and as soon as they lose power they can be raped.”

      Just to clarify, this is just a figurative way of saying, “It’s treason and murder and as soon as they lose power they can go to prison” – correct? I don’t want people claiming we’ve gone full Roosh V at Aryan Skynet.

      Like

    • Hipster Racist
      May 29, 2017

      a German Nazi…that spoke Hebrew.

      I even wrote a post, “All the Best Nazis are Jewish.”

      Anytime I see someone playing the role of (((Hollywood Nazi))) I assume it’s a Jew until proven otherwise. I’m rarely wrong

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Hazelshade
    May 30, 2017

    The amount of detail in this post is impressive! Well done, AS. I’ll need more than one sitting to finish this one.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Hazelshade
    May 31, 2017

    Certainly plausible that Gore/Lieberman would not have been significantly different than Bush/Cheney as far as war on terror. I doubt a Gore/Lieberman presidency would have had the Saudi connections to pull off the 9/11 shenanigans, though.

    Like

    • icareviews
      May 31, 2017

      I don’t know that Saudi connections would have been necessary in order to pull off 9/11. No actual Arabs were needed that day. All America saw was planes flying into buildings on TV. The piloting of the planes was left to viewers’ imaginations. Furthermore, Israel has had its own solid Saudi connections for the past decade and a half. Once more adversarial in foreign policy, the leadership of the two states has been fairly united for most of the War on Terror.

      Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        June 3, 2017

        “images of planes flying into buildings”☺.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 3, 2017

        While he doesn’t fret over whodunnit, Johnson shows that unless Gideon and Jules Naudet were working in collaboration with the Administration, their capturing the first explosion would have been nigh on impossible. It’s an important piece to read for those unfamiliar with NYC geography.
        http://www.serendipity.li/wot/naudet/raphael.htm

        Like

      • icareviews
        June 3, 2017

        I’ve read that and I also find the Naudets suspicious. There’s very little information available about their background, however. Their obscurity as filmmakers (with only one documentary nobody cares about under their belt before 9/11) makes it all the more unusual that the NYFD would block off a street for their movie.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 3, 2017

        The Naduet film was the centerpiece of the 9/11 story – in 2002 is was broadcast on prime time. It was *the* central piece of propaganda for the narrative.

        Then people started asking questions and it was never heard of again, right down the memory hole.

        In fact when people started noticing this, they announced a re-release, an edited version, and a “return” of the Naudet brothers. Which of course never really happened, the story appeared just long enough to squash some rumors then promptly disappeared again.

        There are are lot of former FDNY officers tooling around in luxury cars on their way to their Hampton estates that may have something to do with it.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        June 3, 2017

        Corrige erratum: Raphael, not Johnson.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 3, 2017

        Right. But you’ve got to admit, even getting into the Tisch School of Arts in the first place is quite a hurdle, let alone securing two places for brothers (really?). And Tisch’s coyness? You would think that it’d relish the publicity generated by its most accomplished alumni. No mention of them whatsoever.
        http://www.abeldanger.org/2012/12/04/

        I’ve seen all the various versions. Sinister and corny in equal parts, and hard to watch right through. Bob De Niro was absent as opening narrator in the later iterations.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        June 3, 2017

        If they ever decide to make The Day of the Rope, I suggest these actors as protagonists.
        http://www.bestmoviesguide.com/11-filmmakers-commemorative-tony-benatatos.html

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 3, 2017

        Maybe, à la Alex Jones, Arabs run the Tisch School of Art as well as Hollywood.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        June 3, 2017

        I don’t profess to know a lot about it, but the gay priest victim (sacrifice) is a very murky part of the psy-op:

        Like

      • icareviews
        June 3, 2017

        Mark Bingham is another one of 9/11’s gay heroes.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        June 4, 2017

        The Mark Bingham who introduces himself to his mother in phone calls, ha ha. For the record, I do believe the priest existed. Fake or real, no event is wasted on demonizing the “enemy” alone. There’s fund-raising and boosting for minority causes.

        Like

  7. indravaruna
    June 2, 2017

    Nutyahoo threatening Clinton soon after the Shamir murder is the red flag, the israeli Left died with Shamir and the Oslo accords are a pain in the ass of the hardcore Zionists (Breivik’s Oslo massacre might have been a Mossad revenge operation targeting the Norwegian Left that brought the accords).

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Hipster Racist
    June 2, 2017

    In case you hadn’t heard, Richard Spencer has been nominated for Secretary of the Navy.

    Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      June 3, 2017

      I’m still blocked by Spencer on Twitter.

      Like

      • bob saffron
        June 4, 2017

        Were you mean to him?

        Like

      • icareviews
        June 4, 2017

        He blocked me after I made some sniping remark about NPI celebrating Trump even after Trump had kowtowed to AIPAC and demonstrated himself to have gone full Shabbos goy.

        Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on May 28, 2017 by and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: