Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Open Thread: The Jewish Problem

No issue is more contentious among ethno-nationalists, White nationalists, and the “Alt Right” than the “Jewish Problem.”

What is the Jewish Problem? Is it really a “Jewish Question?”

What is a Jew? Is there a meaningful distinction between a “Jew,” “Judaism,” an “Ashkenazi” or a Zionist?

Is the Jewish Problem a racial and ethnic problem? Is it a religious or cultural problem? A political problem?

How much power do Jews have in America and Canada? Europe? Russia? China, Japan, and the East? Africa?

Is there a serious fight between the “International Jews” and Zionist Jews, Israeli Jews?

Advertisements

134 comments on “Open Thread: The Jewish Problem

  1. Hipster Racist
    April 27, 2017

    There’s a joke going around:

    Q: What’s the difference between Donald Trump and a Reform Jew?

    A: Trump has three Jewish grandchildren.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Pingback: Open Thread: The Jewish Problem | Hipster Racist

  3. Rudolf
    April 27, 2017

    ‘Give me the power to print money, and I won’t mind who is formally sitting on the throne’ said Mr. Rot.

    This is the principle of judaism. This is the root of the jewish problem.

    Liked by 4 people

    • Hipster Racist
      April 27, 2017

      A simplistic reading of this would imply that hard money would make the Jewish problem go away – but there was definitely a Jewish problem even back during the era of hard money.

      A more expansive reading of this is the Wright Island Model, Jews as a market dominant minority – it’s their cohesive group ethnocentrism which allows them to dominate important choke points in the economy.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Rudolf
        April 27, 2017

        Yet, if you don’t own the material power, or the tool allowing you to grab the power in a non-fair way, you cannot rule. Which brings us back to the original issue: mony-mony.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 27, 2017

        It is important to know that the Romans, who accepted any faith or religion, allowed the pharisee to engrave the Roman coins with judaic symbols. That lasted at least until the Bar Kokhba event, circa, if I don’ t go wrong.
        Cohesive group, talmudic brainwashing, innate psychopaty, delusions if grandeur, greed. The lust is long. But one thing is certain: their shift in evil dates back to the creation of the private Bank of England.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        April 27, 2017

        Hard money doesn’t necessarily obviate the fractional reserve model (see the Bank of Amsterdam experience, supposedly a fully-reserved institution, but which in practice started loaning against deposits to certain select clients from very early on in its history). To the extent that fractional reserve lending exists, the boom-bust cycle will prevail. Inflationary cycle followed inevitably by its deflationary counterpart, but with minimal money supply growth over the longer period.

        Many, myself included, think FRB is fraudulent and should be proscribed by law. Even if this is not the case, at least allowing bankruptcy to take place and not guaranteeing deposits is a way of encouraging prudence on the part of depositors (the bank’s creditors, in this case) and bankers themselves.

        Hard money reins in the financial sector and is an indirect brake on Jewish power. In fact, I see little prospect for whites to regain control over their destiny without addressing the MQ.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 27, 2017

        Whatever the technical details of the monetary system, there’s no reason that Whites couldn’t run the same system. There are more high IQ Whites than there are high IQ Jews. It’s obviously not IQ that is putting Jew in power of the financial system (if they indeed are.) I don’t think there were many Jews in American when the Second Bank of the US started, and even the early Fed wasn’t dominated by Jews.

        So at most, that’s a technical issue, not THE Jewish issue.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 27, 2017

        One imagines the money changers mentioned in the New Testament were in fact FRB bankers, paying interest on monies deposited rather than treating them as bailments, accruing no interest.

        Luke 19:23 (KJV):

        Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?

        Matthew 25:27 (KJV):
        Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        April 27, 2017

        Let me elaborate: there is no Final Solution. Anyone who bets against the survival of “The Survivor” is a fool. Historic expulsions only exacerbated the crypto-Jewish Question (CJQ).

        The technical issues of money creation and bank regulation are therefore important insofar as they can circumscribe the power of all bankers (always in cahoots with the monarch/government), a very large percentage of whom will always be Jewish. Unfair enrichment of the banker class and it’s more disastrous correlative, the boom-bust, inflation-deflation business cycle, are not things I’d be happy with even were whites in exclusive control.

        Weak ethnocentrism gave us the great European civilizations. It’s inherent fragility was by strong social institutions.

        My hope is that intellectual property will, in time, be exposed for the swindle it is. Almost as damaging as the money monopoly is the copyright/patent regime, allowing the middlleman, typically, though not always Jewish, to effectively control the dissemination of information.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 28, 2017

        @bob saffron

        Weak ethnocentrism gave us the great European civilizations. It’s inherent fragility was by strong social institutions.

        I take that point, especially about the strong social institutions. But say we reduce the power of bankers – ok, Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism will just have them taking over other important social institutions. We’re right back where we started from. I don’t see how there can be some “technical fix” – some system of rules where everything will be “fair” therefore Jews won’t have too much power.

        In fact, all that does is make it so we have to focus on every issue first before we can deal with the Jewish problem. We have to create a Perfect Society then Jews won’t be a problem anymore. That seem unrealistic, to say the least.

        This idea that Jewish power is based on banking doesn’t seem correct to me at all. Goldman Sachs was run by two Whites during the 2000s. Four of the richest and most powerful Jews in America aren’t bankers, they run Google, Facebook, and Amazon. This notion that Jews = Banking is a leftover from medieval Europe and the late 19th Century.

        It seems like a distraction from the Jewish problem, not a solution to it.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 27, 2017

        Errata corrige:
        “It’s inherent fragility was OFFSET by strong social institutions.”

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 28, 2017

        There are two rethoric inquiries I would like to address;
        the vexata quaestio of the Protocols named as “conspiracy”. At the very bottom, all the statements reported on that doc proved to be extremely adherent to the talmudic vision. Which leads us to consider any discussion about forgery a divisive matter, to say the least.

        – thw jewish question: it has been faced during the past centuries by men of culture & intellect. Last time, they happened to meet in Wannsee. They opted for the Endloesung der Judenfrage, which provided the european organized jewry a region where to live without harassing the civil world: the huge regions of eastern Europe & Russia.
        Isolating them, is the only way to make it out of our own, imposed talmudic tunnel. But previously they must be stripped of their money and power. Much alike a gun you need to discharge before unfolding on your couch.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 28, 2017

        At the very bottom, all the statements reported on that doc proved to be extremely adherent to the talmudic vision.

        Right, which is why it’s almost certain that the Protocols were written by Catholic and/or Orthodox Christians. They show an understanding of Talmudism but no sympathy for Talmudism. If they were actually written by Jews they would show Talmudism in a positive light, instead they are essentially a caricature of Judaism. They have all the hallmarks of being literature in the same genre as Brave New World or 1984. I assume the fact they appeared not long after the First Zionist Congress in 1896 is not a coincidence. It’s likely that “conspiracy theories” about the Zionist movement were commonplace at the time, so some Catholic and/or Orthodox Christians used them as a framework for their anti-Judaic writings.

        The fact the Protocols include some rather dated theories about Freemasonry also point to a Catholic/Orthodox author. The conspiracies about Freemasonry are exactly the view of the Catholic/Orthodox Christians of the time.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 28, 2017

        Nothing about the freemasons, nor the zionists (global jewry) has proven to be exaggerated. On the contrary: the reality, nowadays, overtakes any possible nightmare or sci-fi novel.
        That’s why I consider any discussion about the originality of the Protocols albeit specious.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 28, 2017

        Virtually all of the Catholic conspiracies about the Freemasons have proven to be false, some of them outright comical, like the Taxil hoax.

        There are so many truthful and factual things to pin on the Jews we really don’t need fiction like the Protocols or stuff about the Freemasons. In fact I know that Jews love to spread that stuff because it distracts from their actual bad actions.

        That’s why MacDonald is so valuable, he gave us a way to understand the Jewish problem without the misunderstandings and superstitions of the past. I’m for DE-mystifying the Jewish problem, they are not magic or mysterious, quite the contrary.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 28, 2017

        Bad actions which match what indicated match as a matt black tie on a Boss’ dark grey suit. We’ve made a full lap in 2.77 but we are far from the chequered flag..

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 29, 2017

        Out of cheap methaphore, whilst we are stuck into mere sophism, the global jewry keeps it pace.
        A couple notes:
        – the Protocols are very probably real excerpts of zionists’ agenda
        They are not a Corpus, in the sense that they have been added together as an organic representation of the babylonian-talmudic, supremacist credo.
        – if we apply a drop of logic syllogism, we would amazingly find that:
        If the Protocols are forgery

        But the forgery represent the truth,

        Then: the forgery is the truth.

        Aristotile dixit.

        Addendum: they promane from a russian author, who might be an Orthodox Christian

        If the jews attack the Protocols, then it means they fear them. Don’t expect them to recognize i$rae£’s role in 911 even.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        @Rudolf

        I didn’t say they were a “forgery” which doesn’t make sense. I said they were almost certainly written by a Christian as it’s essentially anti-Judaic dystopian fiction. At the time they appeared, lots of people were predicting the same things, and lots of people know that Jews were promoting the things mentioned in the Protocols. So they did not show any particularly amazing foresight at all, it merely converged a number of known Jewish agendas into a nice fictional but realistic package. Like I said, 1984 or Brave New World.

        1984 and Brave New World are great reads, and they are prophetic in the literary sense, but we shouldn’t pretending they are anything but dystopian fiction.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 29, 2017

        I tend to disagree.
        The motives of my stance are obvious: jews still pretend to fight those presenting the Protocols as a Clue to their global plans And, legally speaking, a few precise, concordant clues do make a juridic Proof. We are also discussing the matter among ourselves, which is another sign we are hitting a Hot Topic.
        I agree, the P. were ‘packed’ by Christians, but I distance myself from any claim wishing them to be substantially untrue.

        1984, on the other hand could it be considered nothing but a well packed list of mere, oculate Fiction tales? Let me doubt, since the predictions are too ‘straight to the point’ to be trashed as sick fancy.
        On the other hand, we have had many precedents of pernicious links between the ‘entertaining indu$try’ and the ZOG’s establisment, dating back to the holoTales. 911, recent False Flags & gun grabbing Hoaxes ( not to mention the great comedy of the Moon) expose inequivocally a tight bound among different sectors of the Cabal in charge.
        Their twisted mind allows some exponents of this global tyranny to make early assertions, half-admissions or to provide the avid consumers with astonishing ‘artistic’ products anticipating the events to be unleashed.
        About E. A. Blair, I can’t invoke any particular tie with the crypto world. Nevertheless, I would stay clear from too semplicistic assertions, or we’d risk to fall into Lucretium’s Clinamen, the ideologic precursor of the inane modernistic scam of Evolutionism.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        The Protocols are like the Handmaiden’s Tale. They took plenty of real aspects of American Evangelical Christianity and exaggerated the bad parts of cut out the good parts, took it out of context, and created a “Protocols of the Male Elders of Patriarchal Christians.”

        Dan Brown’s novel The Davinci Code was basically “Protocols of the Elders of Rome.” Plenty of “true” aspects to it but it’s still fiction.

        There is no single Jew “conspiracy” or Jew “agenda” – it’s an instinct, it’s a tendency. I suspect it’s both genetic and cultural, it’s a genetic instinct that is reinforced by culture.

        And, unfortunately, it’s also reinforced by Christian and Western superstitions about Jews. They are not magic, they are not wizards, they are not super organized either. Their entire tribe is all but falling apart in America – the top Jews, the Jews that run things, are organized by Zionism. The regular Jews, they barely exist as a cohesive group anymore.

        Catholics believe that there is some Secret Jew Synagogue running everything behind the scenes because they are projecting their own highly organized hierarchy outward. It’s the same thing the Catholics do to Freemasonry – they are projecting their own hierarchy onto outside groups.

        There are no “pernicious links” between Hollywood and Zionism – it’s all right out in the open. The movie business is a Jewish business, just like the NYPD is full of micks and the FDNY is full of wops.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Rudolf
        April 29, 2017

        I wonder sometimes where you pick some assertions: ‘ secret synagogue’ for example, or ‘western supertitions about jews’ ..
        Let’s skip the code da vinci which is pure dis-education provided by the same globo jewry we are discussing. It honestly doesn’deserve a word more. About the Protocols, I have sufficiently discussed the issue and no matter what you might guess about the cryptos, you call evangelicals.
        One more thing: freemasons are the weaponized arm of the judaic cabal.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        @Rudolf

        So you don’t see this as a race or ethnic issues, it’s a religious issue. Evangelical Whites are “crypto-Jews” Freemasonry is the “weaponized arm of the judaic cabal” and even if you are against “Abrahamic faiths” it’s clear your mental model is pure Catholicism.

        I’m pro-White, of course. It’s a race and ethnic issue, not a religious issues. Religions are just make-believe, an aspect of culture. Culture is a racial construct.

        The Jews that matter in the world don’t give a damn about the Talmud, they never read it, and even the Talmud itself isn’t particularly interesting or devious. It’s just an expression of ingroup vs. outgroup. It was a surprise to the Protestant Reformers back in the 1500s but it’s of little relevance now, and it certainly is neither the origin of Ashkenazi ethno-centrism nor the source of Jewish power.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 29, 2017

        The blowing matter is: What is a Jew nowadays?

        He’s not a member of a nation, since i$rae£ is a rugue state allowed by bandits and inhabited by mass murderers.

        He’s not a faithful follower of any revealed faith, since talmudism (which is filled with hate quotes of supremacism and murder to non jews) cannot be even considered a traditional faith. It’s a mere, politically incorrect tool for self justification.

        He’s not part of a Race, since the Jew is the subproduct of centuries of misgenetion: jews are mostly american, russian psychotic individuals who generally suffer mental and general balance issues.

        At the end the whole intl’ judaism would stand for its self written book as much as it stands for it’s nevrotic holoHoax. Don’t ever believe the eternal jew when rejecting his ‘sacred beliefs’.
        Last but not least: “Catholicism is my faith.” I would humbly ask to present to me and my readers any clue you have on your hasty assertion, because honestly I miss it.
        Looks like a badly constructed sophism.

        Like

      • Tyrone Trump
        April 29, 2017

        @Hipster “There is no single Jew “conspiracy” or Jew “agenda” – it’s an instinct, it’s a tendency. I suspect it’s both genetic and cultural, it’s a genetic instinct that is reinforced by culture.”

        Yes.

        The Protocols reads as What White People Would Do If They Were Jews.

        The idea of “elite jews” gathering secretly in an old mansion to plot the overthrow of traditional societies via social and cultural engineering is not how they usually operate. It’s much closer to how Whites operate.

        Mostly jews just press every button and see which ones work and which don’t.

        Sometimes two agendas contradict each other: transgenderism vs feminism, anti-racism vs zionism, “diversity” vs jewish control of media, anti-Christianity vs zionist cuckstianity… the only constant is anti-Whiteness.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        @Tyrone Trump

        The Protocols reads as What White People Would Do If They Were Jews.

        That is an excellent formulation, I’m going to use that line from now on.

        Like

    • Tyrone Trump
      April 27, 2017

      I would suspect jewish historical involvement in banking had more to do with the catholic detestation of all things financial than a secret rothschildo-satanic cabal.

      Inflationary monetary politics alone isn’t a hallmark of jewish domination, many Latin American, Arabic or East Asian regimes practice them as well and not all worship the nose of Yellen/Bernanke.

      @HipsterRacist “it’s their cohesive group ethnocentrism which allows them to dominate important choke points in the economy”

      Yes.

      People greatly underestimate the power of coordinated groups.

      If half a dozen muzzies can put an entire city under lockdown with bomb threats, if a group of bank robbers can pull off a raid against a CVIT cargo in 2017 and get away with it, or if 3 or 4 CEOs of an industry can collaborate to artificially inflate stocks, prices and by extension their profit margins, imagine what an entire ethnic group could do.

      jewish (and Asian, to a lesser extent) intelligence is overrated.

      I wouldn’t place them above Whites by any means.

      jews in particular are the most ethnocentric group in existence and still get busted and physically removed (“persecuted”) every three generations or so.

      Whites on the other hand are dumb as bricks when it comes to race realism, or in-group / out-group morality as MacDonald would say, and yet they still control a significant portion of political and economic institutions in most White countries.

      And even in some non-White countries.

      Aside from Haiti and arguably today’s South Africa, there hasn’t yet been an anti-White pogrom.

      Going back to the concept of cohesive ethnocentrism, or ethnic networking, I used the term “coordinated” but in doesn’t even require Bilderberg type conspiracy.

      Most of jewish solidarity starts and ends with the question “is this good for jews?”.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 28, 2017

        We have a good economic model, the “Wright Island Model” that explains how a highly cohesive minority can dominate – and it isn’t specific to Jews, or the West. It also explains overseas Chinese domination of other East Asians.

        Whites are clearly less ethnocentric than other groups, and Americans are even less ethnocentric than Europeans – although Americans never had any problem segregating themselves from Blacks, the anti-whiteness seems to really be a post-mass media trend.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 28, 2017

        Rottenschild cabal & usury are two sides of the judaic spell. The Usury has been practiced by the talmudics since the Middle Ages. The church gave a special licence to these perverts which they used to banksterize their victims. Obviously the church earned much money on the eternal jew, due to the ‘special patent’ it provided them with.
        Any link to current situation?

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 28, 2017

        Some historic reasons might be involved into the jew-power-gold equation.
        Nonetheless it is a fact the lust for power goes through the ownership of the instruments easing the power to be achieved…ans when it comes to mere greed, the jewry is second to none.

        Like

      • oogenhand
        April 28, 2017

        Jews aren’t burdened with Christian morality. Simply believe that Jesus was a demon possessed sorceror who burns in hell. Christians admit that Atheists living up to Christian ethics only do so due to the afterglow of Christianity. Hell is eternal.

        Like

  4. Pingback: Open Thread: The Jewish Problem | Aryan Skynet | rudolfblog

  5. Cora
    April 27, 2017

    Reblogged this on Crochet Racist.

    Like

  6. Cora
    April 27, 2017

    The JQ historically has been “what do we do with theses jews?” Europeans ruled and when the jews got out of hand they had to decide – make laws against them? Kick them out? Kill them? But today we don’t have the luxury to ask ourselves “what do we do with theses jews?” because Europeans/Whites are no longer in charge. We now have jew rule and he JQ has turned into the WQ. The jews have asked themselves “what do we do with these Whites?” And apparently they’ve decided to kill us.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hipster Racist
      April 27, 2017

      @Cora

      I have a couple of slogans I use:

      1. Jews form the intellectual and financial core of the anti-white movement.

      2. Kevin MacDonald’s work is valuable because his theories allow us to understand the Jewish problem without resorting to Catholic superstitions or “Protocols of Elders” style conspiracy theories.

      Starting from those axioms, if it’s true that Jews are the new ruling class, how do we take them out of power? MacDonald says Jews are powerful because of their hyper-ethnocentrism: that suggests a White hyper-ethnocentrism would put Whites back in power; not only do Whites have the numbers, but even if Jews are above the average White IQ, Whites have enough numbers that there are more highly intelligent Whites than there are highly intelligent Jews.

      I certainly believe it was control of the mass media was a key way Jews got into power, but the internet has certainly changed that equation.

      Go to youtube or any other relatively uncensored internet property and the “anti-semitism” is at an almost comical level – there are certainly a hundred thousand, if not more, people – at least a good percentage who are White – that are quite clued into the Jewish problem.

      What’s the solution?

      Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        April 27, 2017

        I’m hard-pressed to imagine a Europe without the Catholic Church. A return to the tribes of two millenia ago would yield a very different civilization. And those religious superstitions were extremely effective in inculcating a them-us consciousness in whites, present tenfold in Jews.
        https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/whatever-happened-to-european-tribes/

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 27, 2017

        Hyperethnocentrism is the product of inbreeding over several millenia. It would be impossible to out-Jew the Jew in that respect (even if one thought that at all desirable).

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 28, 2017

        WASP America had no problem with racial segregation. WASPs had “restricted clubs” that excluded Jews – even Ivy League school up until the 1930s had limits on Jewish admissions. American has a long history of at least enough ethnocentrism to keep out Jews (and others) from their important institutions. Even if we aren’t “hyper-ethnocentric” like Jews we clearly had at least enough ethno-centrism for a long time.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 28, 2017

        I think we’re saying the same things. Social institutions, protean and extremely numerous one century ago, were far better at detecting and excluding Jews than the State (country club being the classic example).

        Jewish power is formidable not so much due to its absolute magnitude, but rather the manner in which it can be focused on specific objectives. Singularly strong group unity allows for this.

        Frustrating Jewish ascendency is best achieved by having diffuse, decentralized power structures. Two power nodes might be tractible, two thousand and you suffer informational difficulties along with reduced payoff for a given “investment”.

        HR: “But say we reduce the power of bankers – ok, Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism will just have them taking over other important social institutions. We’re right back where we started from. ”

        Well, yes, far better to find ourselves where we started from than where we are today. I think we can agree that the West and its autochtonous peoples were in better shape a couple of centuries ago than today. Jewish/Gentile power is always cyclical and neither side wins outright.

        Jews don’t have to boast all CEO’s on Wall St. to run the show any more than Hollywood has to have entirely Jewish producers or directors to own the town.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        @bob saffron

        One of the conservative arguments for a limited government is the fact that the larger and stronger a state is, the more it tends to crowd out Civil Society. All those non-government institutions, churches, fraternities, the Elks, the Moose Lodge, the Rotary club, gardening clubs, business and professional associations, etc.

        Both the Communists and to some degree the Fascist did their best to undermine these social institutions and replace them with Leviathan State. There’s a reason the progressive left is going after college fraternities – they call them “exclusionary” – which of course they are. It’s legal for a fraternity to be exclusionary and even if it’s illegal for them to be openly segregated, the segregation happens naturally. Face it, most black guys aren’t going to want to join a white fraternity anyway, and vice versa. There are both fraternities and sororities that are known as “Jewish” because people tend to self-segregate naturally.

        So I agree that having diffuse, decentralized power structure is not only a good defense against Jew subversion, it’s also somewhat natural of Northwestern Europeans, maybe Europeans generally, and it’s definitely in the American character.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        April 28, 2017

        Oh, I don’t know why I didn’t state the obvious: abolish affirmative action and most whites will self-segregate with no need for haranguing.

        Like

  7. Cora
    April 27, 2017

    @Hipster I definitely don’t like the idea of White hyper-ethnocentrism because it implies we would continue to live side by side with jews. Whites should live separate and apart from the other races. Yes, I agree the power jews have today comes from control of the mass media. Degenerate jews won the 60s culture war with very small numbers because just about every White person in America had a TV in their living room that fed them jew poison called “news.”

    Like

  8. Bob Sagget
    April 27, 2017

    O B E N B O L L !!!!!!

    Like

  9. Tyrone Trump
    April 27, 2017

    I’ll bite the watermelon.

    1. What is the Jewish Problem? Is it really a “Jewish Question?”

    It has been a problem for many host societies, not just White.

    The JQ arose following the realization of the problem, or rather the recognition that there was a problem.

    For most of human history the answer has been deportation / citizenship forfeiture.

    2. What is a Jew? Is there a meaningful distinction between a “Jew,” “Judaism,” an “Ashkenazi” or a Zionist?

    jew => the race.
    judaism => the religion.
    ashkenazi => the ethnic group constituting most of jewry.
    zionist => the political movement demanding a homeland for jews.

    The last point raises a good question.

    If the goals of political zionism have all been met last century (Israel) then why are there still zionist lobbies in every instance of every government of every White country?

    judaism is simply the religion practiced by many jews and some retarded gentiles who believe they can convert to another race (Michael Jackstein).

    A White who practices judaism (Ivanka Trump) is no more jewish than a jew who converts to Christianity becomes a Fellow-White-Person-Just-Like-You™.

    (((Bill Maher))) and (((Jew Stewart))) aren’t likely the most rabid judaists in the synagogue… Have they ever even set a foot inside?

    3. Is the Jewish Problem a racial and ethnic problem? Is it a religious or cultural problem? A political problem?

    It’s first and foremost a racial problem with cultural and political ramifications.

    jews have been parasites / a hostile group pretty much in every nation, not just White or even Western.

    Some claim jews can be converted to Christianity / Whiteness and that as long as they renounce their religion / culture they will no longer pose a problem.

    In that case allow me to present the Tyrone theory on the “Negro Problem”.

    Negros can be assimilated into a White society as long as they renounce KFC & Beyoncé, start eating spinach and listening to Taylor Swift and act like Whites at all times.

    Reminds me of someone… Bill Mitchell?

    4. How much power do Jews have in America and Canada? Europe? Russia? China, Japan, and the East? Africa?

    Their level of power is more or less correlated to their percentage of the general population.

    America > Europe > Russia > East.

    Africa is a wildcard since it’s more or less controlled by outsiders.

    Either Euro or Asian.

    Or (((Euro))) and (((Asian))) sometimes.

    The nature and manifestations of that power however are different.

    In America every media outlet, cultural institution and societal organ was handed to them on a silver ashtray by the “greatest generation”.

    It follows that their “power” manifests itself mostly through the media / culture.

    In the ex-USSR it was the opposite, full control of the executive but they never managed to “radically transform” the inner character of Eastern people.

    Western Euros are somewhere between the two, probably closer to the ex-USSR side.

    The total domination of Hollywood / MSM by foreign groups is something most non-Americans, or most non-English speakers to be precise, have a difficult time grasping.

    5. Is there a serious fight between the “International Jews” and Zionist Jews, Israeli Jews?

    Rly?

    Is there a serious fight between the GOP and the Dems?

    Is there a serious fight between orthodox jews and Hollywood faggot race-mixing jews?

    A jew is a jew.

    However there are points of contention.

    International jews are scared shitless of Israelis provoking muzzies into a pogrom frenzy as retribution for their Palestinian brothers.

    Israel jews are scared shitless of a BDS style economic war with their stolen shithole.

    I’ll even add a sixth question…

    6. Who is the bigger problem, the “big jew” like Soros, Schumer, Shoamsky, Ignatiev, Maher, Stewart/Leibowitz, Sanders/Gutman…

    …or the “little jews” that demand the above be treated seriously and not hostile agents of a foreign body?

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Primarius Krone
    April 27, 2017

    What is the Jewish Problem? Is it really a “Jewish Question?”

    In the simplest and most general terms, while we have given up all concept of ethnic bonds (either willingly or through guilt-trips) and on the surface, they appear to do the same thing, the reality is that they are hyper-ethnocentric, hyper-aggressive and either consciously or unconsciously pursue “agendas” that are aligned with those interests.

    It only works because we have a boat load of traitors (or people who simply want to “make it”) and they look kinda white (at least to the untrained eye.) Let’s face it, it’s kind of comical when an Arab or Chinese person tries to do the same thing they do (it’s obvious they are trying to game the system) – a large part of “the problem” is that they almost perfectly blend in.

    If one morning all White men woke up and said to themselves “I *am* a White man” the whole magic show falls apart. In that sense, it’s not really about Jews at all.

    IMHO of course.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Tyrone Trump
      April 27, 2017

      “It only works because we have a boat load of traitors (or people who simply want to “make it”) and they look kinda white (at least to the untrained eye.) Let’s face it, it’s kind of comical when an Arab or Chinese person tries to do the same thing they do (it’s obvious they are trying to game the system) – a large part of “the problem” is that they almost perfectly blend in.”

      So what you’re saying is…

      1. There is such a thing as “White privilege” (detrimental to Asians and Arabs)
      2. White people, lacking ethnic solidarity, don’t and can’t benefit from it
      3. jews not only benefit from their own ethnic networks, they also profit from white privilege because they “look White”

      Ergo “White privilege” is really jewish privilege.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Primarius Krone
        April 27, 2017

        Well, yes. Race reality dictates that a greater percentage of Whites will dominate important positions in any endeavour – that’s the “White Privilege” I know of. Also, given that it was only a relatively short period of time that our homelands were colonised by the 3rd world, I would expect that more Whites are in these positions by default (a numbers game, although that’s obviously changing.)

        I would say many if not most Whites labour under the impression that we live in a pure Meritocracy. Conspiracy is not something they want to hear about. So when we start complaining about the Jews dominating the Media or what have you, it’s automatically “anti-Semitism” to their eyes, the “you just hate them because they are successful” line. Whites are reluctant to explore the idea that the other team is playing by a different set of rules.

        When a non-White, that sticks out like a sore thumb and more often than not at the bottom of the food chain starts chanting specifically for their interests, it perks up our ears. Although the plight of black people (because of slavery, “institutional racism” or simply being dirt poor) does get the attention of some Whites because of guilt.

        I’d say Jewish Privilege is a very real thing. As you surmise, they look “white” and much of their ethnic networking goes unnoticed by the masses. And if it is noticed, it’s taboo to talk about.

        Like

  11. Russian Limbaugh
    April 27, 2017

    International Jewry? What was that prior to and after 1939?

    Read all posts from “Been-There” in this thread.

    Notice all the hasbara dirty tricks to conceal the truth.

    https://rodoh.info/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1779

    Like

  12. Primarius Krone
    April 27, 2017

    In so far as there being in-fighting between Jews (“Liberal” Open Borders Types vs Zionists), there must be some.

    In his 2006 AmRen talk, Dr. Guillaume Faye brought up the fact that Jews in France have begun to “wake up” as they are attacked in the streets by Muslims. Waves have been leaving for Israel (supposedly) which pleases Zionists to no end. The implication being that prior to that, they were happy to import as many as possible to weaken the native population’s power and resolve.

    On the other hand, you have Jews like Atzmon who tell us it’s a hoax – they still ultimately bind together. They just want to give the *impression* that they are good, moral and not hypocritical, but in reality still support the Zionist state.

    I don’t know. Are all the Jewish protesters outside AIPAC full of it? Probably not. But I’d hazard a guess that most Jews (regardless of political persuasion) still support the Jewish homeland, come hell or high water. Which tells you all you need to know about the duplicity of Jews.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      April 27, 2017

      Aliyah helped along in no small part by the (((False Flag))) Charlie Hedbo event and similar. Israel needs fresh blood for its army and industries and needs older, richer Jews to remain in Europe and send money. I don’t think Jews are seriously endangered by Muslims in Europe (the former living in the better, more protected suburbs).

      Like

    • Hipster Racist
      April 27, 2017

      I say there is a real and serious fighting going on for the “Jew” label – it’s between Israel and the Diaspora.

      Have you seen the Israeli film “Defamation?” It was a full-throated attack on “liberal reform” Diaspora Jews. It basically implied that they were not “real Jews” and that they were making “real Jews” – like the ones in Israel – look bad. It basically accused them of fomenting anti-semitic and anti-Israel sentiment. It was a direct attack on Abe Foxman of the ADL itself – the Biggest Jew in America.

      On Forward.com there’s a fight between liberal Jew complaining that Israel won’t recognized their non-Jewish spouses and in some cases won’t even recognize half-Jews but that Ivanka Trump got a special exemption because she’s famous and important.

      I say it’s a real fight. We should exploit that tension.

      Like

      • Primarius Krone
        April 27, 2017

        Yes, you’re right. Now that you mention it, I’ve been told this directly in numerous online debates by “right-wing” Jews that the “left-wing” Jews could hardly be called Jews at all.

        But then they still give them “kudos” for leading this left-wing movements, which is a revealing example of double-think.

        How do we further divide them, and, perhaps more importantly, gain an advantage from it?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 27, 2017

        @PK

        My strategy is “Israel First.”

        When a Diaspora Jew is pushing for open borders in America, I say we turn them around and say “Israel First.” If Jews want to lead, they can best lead by example.

        When a Diaspora Jew talks about “white privilege” I say we turn them around and say, “Israel First.” Let them confront Jewish privilege in their own communities.

        When a Diaspora Jew talks about nationalism or “fascism” or “racism” or apartheid, I say turn them around and say “Israel First.” Jews should be fighting Jewish racism first, they should be fighting Israeli apartheid first.

        When a Diaspora Jew talks about affirmative action, I say we tell them “Israel First.” Let them give up their own privileged positions to Blacks and Browns.

        After all, if they remove that beam out of their own eye first, they can then see clearly to help us take the speck out of our eye. A Jew said that. So it’s kosher all around.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        April 28, 2017

        Whistling past the graveyard, ha ha. What could go possibly wrong with a majority Haredim Israel population?
        http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.684512

        Like

  13. icareviews
    April 27, 2017

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  14. icareviews
    April 27, 2017

    They’re space lizards. I thought we all knew that here.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. icareviews
    April 27, 2017

    “Is there a serious fight between the ‘International Jews’ and Zionist Jews, Israeli Jews?”

    My next post actually touches on this.

    Like

  16. smartwhiteguy
    April 28, 2017

    Liked by 2 people

  17. BMan
    April 28, 2017

    It really is simple. Jewish control needs to be curtailed and eliminated from America (and anywhere else they have wreaked such depraved assaults against whites).

    Pretty good stuff here:

    Big Links on the JQ
    https://disenchantedscholar.wordpress.com/2017/03/17/big-links-on-the-jq/

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hipster Racist
      April 28, 2017

      I’m a huge fan of Disenchanted Scholar but I didn’t realize she even addressed the kosher issue – I’m pleasantly surprised.

      Like

  18. eyeslevel
    April 28, 2017

    The most consequential Jewish problem we have right now is the mistaken belief by many pro-whites that “exposing the Jew” will accomplish anything useful. It’s been tried for 70 years and failed miserably. Even VP Joe Biden came out and said Jews run Hollywood. It didn’t hurt them one bit.

    “It’s the Jews!!!” doesn’t discredit the anti-white system or any anti-white. It doesn’t point out a contradiction, it doesn’t impose terminology, it doesn’t help get pro-whites in power, it DOESN’T WORK.

    Like

    • eyeslevel
      April 28, 2017

      “Israel for Jews, white countries for everybody?” Now you’re discrediting them by pointing out a contradiction. That works.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 28, 2017

        @eyeslevel

        My take is perfectly compatible with Mantra talking points. I think they hypocrisy and double standards is all the “exposing the Jews” we need. I do think pointing out that a lot of the anti-white rhetoric actually comes from people who do not actually identify as “Jews” is quite helpful – that tends to make White people angry. Nobody likes to be played for a sucker.

        Like

  19. Bob Sagget
    April 28, 2017

    OK

    Bad attempt at ‘trolling’ over

    Is it wrong if I bring up Mischlings in relation to this question?

    Again, sorry for the ‘OBENBOLL’ thing, I was tired….

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      April 28, 2017

      @Bob Sagget

      Sorry I have no idea what you are getting at or what you meant so I just ignored it.

      What about mischlings? Lots of “Jews” in America are likely 1/8 or 1/16 Ashkenazi yet they still identify as “Jew” – even though they aren’t even religious.

      Like

      • Bob Sagget
        April 28, 2017

        Sorry, yeah it’s an internet thing. ‘Open polls’ on Facebook, and all that…

        I was just bringing it up because I think it kinda relates to the whole ‘conflict within the Jewish community’ thing that was mentioned earlier.

        As in Mischlings who identify as ‘Jewish’ (most likely allot of whom are liberal Jews) vs. Jews who don’t permit Mishclings who identify as Jewish to do so (i.e. Orthodox Jews, maybe Zionists) vs. Mishclings who don’t like either group (that is, the liberal ‘Jews’ and the Zionists).

        Quite a conundrum

        Like

      • Bob Sagget
        April 28, 2017

        And then there’s the part-Jews who don’t even know they’re part Jewish, lol

        Like

  20. Gaben
    April 29, 2017

    Can you guys inform me more on the Jewish influence on race mixing and why are they in pursuit of such actions that are not only ethnically destructive on us whites, but given that they are 10 times less numerous than we are, it would affect them even harder than whites? Jewesses are also, from what Ive heard from American dudes, pretty prone to coalburning too. This puzzles me, seeing how an ethnic group so nationalistic tends to be so anti-racialist at times too. Jews are into extremes it seems. This race mixing agenda in general is confusing as fuck to me too, wish someone could elaborate on this, plus the Jew influence on this too.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      April 29, 2017

      Simple, they hate Whites more than they love themselves.

      Actually Jews have been really open and explicit about this. They promote “diversity” – racial, ethnic and otherwise, because in homogeneous societies they stick out like a sore thumb. But in a very “diverse” society they are just one group among many. It’s why they promote “gay marriage” – it’s not that they like gays, they are more “homophobic” than anybody, but in a society where two dudes can get “married,” a weirdo Jew waving a bleeding chicken around his head in a sacrifice to Satan doesn’t seem so weird. A society where White kids get tattoos and body piercings make Jew genital mutilation seems not that bad.

      Plus Jews themselves are notorious race mixers – just like the Mestizos of Latin America, they want to incorporate White genes to “improve the race” (yes, they actually use that phrase, “improve the race.”)

      Jews push “Blacks on Blondes” in the media because they are extremely jealous of White women, especially blondes, and it’s both a fetish to them and a way to “demean” White people in their eyes.

      The are nationalistic for themselves while being anti-nationalist for everyone else. It makes perfect sense. We call it “hypocrisy” and find it immoral, but they call it “chutzpah” and think it’s something to be proud of.

      Like

      • Gaben
        April 29, 2017

        I see, and I understand all of their mechanisms very well. However, it gets tricky when debating ‘normies’ about this, and the race mixing alone. Jews like Zuckerberg, Soros and possible cryptos like Murdoch skew this image with their Asian waifus a little bit. Also, the end goal of this agenda is possible for guys like us to understand and see, but the uninformed sheep normie cannot comprehend such deeds. You and me can see it in the commercials, in the media and everywhere as it is pretty obvious to the non-brainwashed mind. Like a scene straight out of ‘They Live’, lol. I mean, hell the owners of porn studios that push interracial garbage are mostly Jews too, and their agenda is getting more sinister over time. It’s maybe a bit off topic, but how do we approach this when debating? Besides citing stats regarding Negros, and jumping straight into the Jewish influence?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        If by “race mixing” you mean miscegenation, you’re just being reactionary. It isn’t that common and where it is common it is not because of Jews, or Jew Hollywood. It doesn’t matter how many TV shows a white girl watches about Study Black Doctor dating Blonde Princess – in real life white girls know blacks guys are, well, Basketball-Americans. Where miscegenation does happen is where blacks are in charge, in the ghetto, in really low class areas, etc.

        The problem isn’t miscegenation, it’s that Whites are forced to pretend to like it, or be neutral about it, because “racisms.” The “real” problem is that Whites aren’t allowed to take their own side publicly. Even though Whites do tend to be less ethno-centric than other races, Whites are “racist” as hell, just like everybody else.

        Yes, Jews run the porn business, no question. But the solution to that is pretty simple – don’t watch porn.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        “how do we approach this when debating?”

        If you are trying to reach normies, there is one and only one way: The Mantra. Bob Whitaker’s talking points. “Anti-racism is a code for anti-white.” That is the only “debating tactic” that has proven to be effective.

        Once people internalize the Mantra, you can move on to strategy and analysis.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 29, 2017

        Totally correct analysis.
        The generally amoral nature of the ever jew is expressed by its twisted affection for perversion too.
        Most pedophiles are in fact of jewish origins. Genderism, feminism, misgenetion, apart from being tools to futher their supremacist agenda, are often major entertainments to them.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        “Most pedophiles are in fact of jewish origins. ”

        Of course they aren’t. One of the ways Jews have power is because so many White are Judeo-centric. You’re literally projecting all evil in the world on to Jews. They are “Children of the Devil.” The only way you can understand Jews is through superstition and conspiracy theories.

        They fill up so much space in your head. Are you even pro-White? Or are you just anti-Jew? That is the problem with certain strains of Christianity – they are not at all pro-White, they are just anti-Jew. It’s all about unifying the entire world against “The Jew.”

        Jews are not uniquely evil. They are just a particular tribe of hyper-ethnocentrics.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 29, 2017

        Let’s start from the bottom: ethocentrics is an oxymoron. A badly spent term. They have no race, no religion. They only own deceptive means and delusions of grandeur ad abundantiam. All dresses with psychosis and ancient mixed faiths (when not self appointed as secular jews)
        Upwards some lines:
        Hollyjoo, the egregious manipulation of minds traded as an unbiased form of art, is filled with jews who are pedos. Try to debunk this.
        I am not anti-jew
        I am anti judaism.
        I quite despise abrahmitic faiths & atheists in the same way. Which leaves you the chance of asking me what I do believe in. For me, I just wush to ask you, which side are you really on?

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 29, 2017

        Pedophiles are disbursed amongst such elitist think tanks as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission as well as various covert organizations like Yale’s Skull and Bones Society and 33rd degree and higher Freemasonry. The bottom line is too many of these “upstanding” members are secretly satanic worshipping, bloodthirsty child rapists and killers. Pizzagate, the Clintons, the Weiners and Jeffrey Epstein are merely the tip of the iceberg.
        A little excerpt from;
        https://chemtrailsplanet.net/2017/04/27/ruling-elites-pedophile-bloodlust-for-children-from-antiquity-to-today/

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        Pedophiles are disbursed amongst such elitist think tanks as the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission as well as various covert organizations like Yale’s Skull and Bones Society and 33rd degree and higher Freemasonry.

        I don’t think so. That’s fantasy, that’s a science fiction conspiracy model. The CFR and the TC are the last vestiges of the old post-WWII liberal WASP establishment. Yale’s Skull & Bones was a WASP fraternity for rich kids and their hocus-pocus is literally just fratboy pranks. Nobody “worships Satan.” The Epstein case is a clear example of a black mail ring, but you’ll note the girls he prostituted were post-adolescent, thus were more “jailbait” than actual pedophilia, just like most homos are “pederasts” rather than actual “pedophiles.” Real pedophilia is rare, “jailbait” is common.

        It’s difficult to take “Chemtrailsplanet” – which I’ve read before – seriously. It’s just conspiracy fiction.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 29, 2017

        The term “conspiracy” you insist in abusing, shows a couple things:

        -you adopt the typical, old & abundantly debunked CIA jargon. Which, let me say, might be unproductive for the allegations you present.
        It’s a fact you cannot debunk in any way the fact your rotten post-capitalistic sub-civilization produces any type of heinous tool to disrupt the resistance of the people. Pedophily is one of them. The system is obviously driven by the global jewry who is involved in any kind of deviancy as I have partially explained before (even if they are not always the only culprits). The cabal of the CFR (american one) is the same one nominating high profile congress & senate members. Which, amazingly, do support the talmudics (i$raelites) 1000%, as a mole named Donald used to say not long ago.
        The matter of fact is, you will never be able to deny that the system is totally infiltrated by global zionism. More: it is the expression of it. It’s not a chance, the vice & the proud of the ‘steam owners’ represent with great dignity… the democratic regime.

        Let’s gliss on your ..’real pedophilia is rare’ (SIC) and your latest rant on ‘conspiracy fiction’. Agree?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        I like to make a distinction between a “conspiracy” – which is a legal term and relates to something in the real world – and “conspiracy culture” – which is Alex Jones and other fiction.

        If you want to understand how the blackmail thing works, you can read the testimony of FBI agent Sibel Edmonds, a credible source that has had her testimony to the 9/11 Commission censored to this day.

        I didn’t say Catholicism is your “faith” – I said that your entire worldview you’ve expressed here in Catholicism. You understanding of Judaism is based on Catholicism, your understanding of Freemasonry is based on Catholicism, and even the “conspiracy theories” you talk about are based on Catholic superstition – same with the Protocols stuff.

        You know party of the gimmick of the CIA’s use of the term “conspiracy theory” was to conflate theories about the JFK assassination – which was found by the Congress to be an actual “conspiracy” – with vague and hazy superstitions about “the Masons” and “Skull & Bones” and the like.

        There is a difference between a theory about a conspiracy and institutional analysis. 9/11 was a conspiracy, Jew Hollywood is an institution, not a conspiracy.

        Your use of the terms “Jew” “race” “religion” and much of the rest are just semantic redefinitions of common words that mystify more than they reveal.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 29, 2017

        Conspirator is who ‘conspires’.
        You have been experiencing conspirations well before the affaire of the Maine.
        Thus, I won’t stress the issue any longer. You have had essays of Conspiracy for many, many decades already. If not centuries. Yet, you offer the wrong significance of the term.

        Hollyjoo is inhabited by hedonistic crooks who often, do Conspire for the sake of the buck, demokracy and their innate, geneting agenda of subversion.

        Here Lies the Pact: it is not a secret contract signed among moles dressed in exotic garments. It’s a endemic way of life, an expression of intimate judaic ‘spirit’ they turn into lethal action on behalf-what a chance!- of the judaic cabal.

        The fact my assertions on the dark tetrad of freemasonry, satanism and zionism are based on Catholicism is not an allegation. It’s what we define impartially as a rant.

        My terms about race, jew religion, report facts. I would impartially suggest to answer my request: what is a jew, today?
        You will see, my terms perfectly match the target and are everything but ‘Catholic’.

        Just a few more notes to summarize the obvious:
        the jews sneaked into European countries’ institutions by offering highly specialized ‘services’ such as usury.

        -they convinced a moron, whom people named King, to lend money to the crown. Later on their self confidence increased to the point where they asked to print the money.

        -The local governants rapidly accostumed themselves to become goyims thus leaving the Effective Power into the hands of the Dainestocrats.

        But this, is a story you should already know.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        The fact my assertions on the dark tetrad of freemasonry, satanism and zionism are based on Catholicism is not an allegation. It’s what we define impartially as a rant.

        You are incorrect. You did not “discover” the “dark tetrad of freemasonry, satanism and zionism” – the Catholics did. Catholics created those categories and lumped them together. Everything you are saying has been said by Catholics for over 200 years. It is simply unreasonable to believe that you are repeating Catholic propaganda exactly but you are not influenced by Catholicism.

        Jews didn’t invent usury either. Jews did not “sneak into Europe” and sucker the aristocracy into taking loans – that’s false. No actual history shows that at all. The play between the aristocracy, the Church, and Jews is complex, it’s simply not at all simple as you are making it out to be.

        You will see, my terms perfectly match the target and are everything but ‘Catholic’.

        Also false, your terms perfectly match Catholic superstition, word for word. You have provided zero analysis other than the very common Catholic analysis from 200 years ago. You’ve hit every single Catholic superstition: Jews, Satanists, Freemasons, the Protocols, usury, etc.

        You’re also just plain wrong about the CFR. You seem to be using the CFR as yet another hazy category, no different than “Satanists” or “usurers.” The Bilderbergers existed BEFORE the CFR. The CFR is a specific group of people, formed at a specific time, for a specific reason. Like Freemasons, you’re just using them as a “bad” “conspiracy” category while ignoring the specific details.

        There’s nothing to “debunk” exactly because not only have you provided no evidence, you’ve gotten significant details wrong, and your theories are non-falsifiable anyway.

        Again, it’s just Catholic superstition, from 200 years ago. You aren’t adding anything new.

        That’s why I’m so glad that someone like MacDonald exists, because he gave us a more accurate way to understand the Jew Problem than all the incorrect Catholic superstition you are repeating.

        Also, again, only religious Jews read the Talmud – the Talmud is virtually irrelevant to the Jewish issues of today and mostly irrelevant when it comes to Zionism. The only people who care about the Talmud are religious Jews and superstitious Catholics.

        MacDonald and the Wright Island Model can explains things far more accurately and with far more precision than the Catholic superstitious conspiracy theories you’ve posited. It is what it is.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 30, 2017

        Catholics did it! Your sick fascination with this mantra shows plainly you are not interested in deepening the subject. Your aim is to contradict my analisys via cheap buzzwords, since you obviously lack the knowledge to recognize what catholicism did & how it operated ( sometimes in dichotomy with the talmudics, others in full accordance).
        Again: answer to my inquiry
        What Is A Jew?
        You don’ t have the insight to detect what is “catholic”, ” lutheran” or ” calvinist”. Thus you keep presenting to us the same, few ‘sacred pillars’ of your secular beliefs which are mainly based on partial knowledge, when not on mere onanism.
        Mac Donald work is outdated and partial and certainly doesn’t provide the unlucky reader the instruments to have the full picture. Reducing the world’s vision to a materialistic playground is not only a mistake communists & capitalists do, but it is culturally gross.
        I will offer my readers a Final Check List of your wrong cultural attitudes:
        You negate Freemasonry is a spin off of judaism
        You negate hollyjoo is the epicenter of mental brainwashing in your entertainment indu$try
        You have a special relation of affection with the zio CFR, the founding father of our modern disgraces & mouthpiece of the ‘merikan system. (Bilderbergians were far from seeing the light. It’s chronicle)
        You refer to jews as ‘ethnocentric’ people, when it is proven they are no race.
        You seem to have a mental attraction for the ‘ wasps’, the ‘ sniff and run’ boys of the 80s. The cryptos who put the buck in front of everything. No philosophic group, no cultural backgrounds stands before the ones gathered under that acronym.
        You fill your mouth with words about ‘white race’, but it is honestly hard for us to see what you intend for that or what you are aiming at.
        You NEGATE geoengineering and the obvious conspiracy taking place any day above your head. A conspiracy which I dare you to debunk with scientific proof.
        Conclusions:
        From what I can see, your vision is partial & biased. You have posted an “open thread” just to spew your very personal doctrine
        But all you accomplish, is to turn this thread into a stale banter.
        No interchange is possible. Because in no way, you can convince a priest, whether secular or not, to listen to your words. Henceforth enjoy the laughter among yourselvws. Thanks for your time.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 30, 2017

        @Rudolph

        You aren’t “deepening the subject.” You are rehashing well known, 200 year old superstitions that do not help us understand the Jewish problem, but quite the contrary, mystify the Jewish problem. In fact, your “analysis” of the Jewish problem is often spread by Jews themselves, because you are putting Jews at the center of the universe – they are “The Devil” himself, you actually call them “Satanic.” And every single “bad” thing in the world you just label “Jew” – Freemasons, pedophiles, the CFR!

        Saying “a specific group of Israelis assassinated JFK” is a theory about a conspiracy. Saying “the Freemasons, the CFR, the Trilateral Commission, Skull & Bones, the Evangelical Christians, and the pedophiles are all following the Protocols of the Elders of Zion and the Talmud are all actually Jews and they worship SATAN” isn’t really a theory about a conspiracy, it’s more an all encompassing world-view.

        I also didn’t say “the Catholics did it” – whatever that is even supposed to mean. I’m saying that YOU, yourself, are simply repeating 200 year old Catholic conspiracy theories, and you’ve hit very nearly every note. The Catholics also said that the Freemasons were really secretly controlled by the Jews “at the top” and that the Protestant reformation was also a Jewish plot, and that Jews were Satanists, and that the entire history of the world is a struggle between good Catholics and Satan-worshipping Jews. In Catholic superstition, there are only two sides, Catholics and Jews.

        Even if you yourself are not Catholic, your worldview is obviously very much Catholic whether you realize it or not.

        You are not offering any sort of unique analysis, everything you are saying has been said by superstitious Catholics for years.

        And it’s mostly wrong, the facts don’t bear out this “theory” and it’s nothing but mystification, superstition, religious nuttery, and it’s very Judeo-centric.

        You should read the infamous “Tragedy and Hope” by Carroll Quigley, a sort of “insider’s view” on the liberal globalism of WWII, which will broaden your understanding of globalism and even the Jewish problem, without having to resort to superstitions like the Elders of the Protocol of Zion.

        A conspiracy which I dare you to debunk with scientific proof.

        You’re the one asserting this conspiracy you’d have to show evidence for any of it, which you have of course not done.

        You have posted an “open thread” just to spew your very personal doctrine

        Well it’s true that I don’t agree with you, at all. I find your analysis of the Jewish problem to be not just wrong, but counter-productive. The thread has done what I wanted it to do, it gives me an idea of various people’s understanding of the Jewish problem. Some see it as a race thing, some see it as an economic thing, some see it as a religious thing, and some see it as literally “Jews are Satanic Children of the Devil” which is of course something that can neither be proven nor disproven with scientific evidence.

        I’ve always been clear about my views: Kevin MacDonald gives us a way to understand the Jewish problem without resorting to your Protocols of Zion style conspiracy theories and Catholic-based superstitions.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 30, 2017

        You are again spewing the same lies, Hipster.
        You do not have any actual insight of religions and religious related issues. Your obvious, lethal fixation about catholicism steers you away from real comprehension of the jewish problem. All you share is secular dogma or very personal, at times, aberrant point of view. A personal, materialistic opinion which is not based on facts but on mere selfishness of a self-made guy trading himself as an ‘intellectual’. Your Modus Operandi & the way you reply to my requests show to us you are trying to pull the leg to your very thread.
        You are feeding your readers with partial truths and try vainly to patronize my assertions, willingly distorting the sense of my words. Meanwhile, you keep yourself well clear of any reply or argument which would debunk your thesis. ‘Devil, satanic, kids of satan’…these words are well engraved in your brain. You are a materialistic positivist, Hipster. Not any different from any specimen living in your ZOG. You are the sub-product of your society. Reducing the judaism to risiblw ‘ethnocentrism’ or economic matters is the reason why the critical thinking has collapsed nowadays.

        Now, since you haven’t been able to provide any reply to my inquiries, (What is a Jew, in particular) and you seem keen to resort to the usual mantra which YT is full of, I have stated that the one you are offering here is a simple trick, a mock-up of a discussion. And I have already stated to abstain from partecipating to this farce. In other, more pacate words, you provide no food for thought. I ask you AGAIN not to involve me in your one-way discussion. Hope you will give Roger at least on that.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 30, 2017

        You refer to jews as ‘ethnocentric’ people, when it is proven they are no race.

        Maybe we’re having a language barrier here. Ashkenazi Jews are of the Caucasian race, just like their other Semitic friends, the Arabs.

        Let’s look at what “ethnicity” means:

        Membership of an ethnic group tends to be defined by a shared cultural heritage, ancestry, origin myth, history, homeland, language or dialect, symbolic systems such as religion, mythology and ritual, cuisine, dressing style, art, and physical appearance.

        Now let’s look at the word “ethnocentric”

        evaluating other peoples and cultures according to the standards of one’s own culture.

        As we can see, the fact that “Jew” is not a race hardly means that Jews don’t tend to be ethnocentric.

        I find the rest of your analysis based on semantic nonsense and religious superstitions (the whole “Satan” thing.)

        It just doesn’t hold up to scrutiny, that’s all.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 30, 2017

        You keep insisting in your stance, I see.
        Provide the source, next time you paste some lines, please.

        I contest the proposition you offer as long as it denies RACE is ethnicity. Yet, ypu can abuse thw definition you look fond of in your ‘vernacular’ rantings. For the rest a famous brocard will suffice:

        Quod erat demonstrandum..

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 30, 2017

        >Provide the source, next time you paste some lines, please.

        They were from wiki but of course the definitions aren’t really in dispute.

        >it denies RACE is ethnicity

        They are two different categories although obviously related.

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 30, 2017

        Yes. Wiki. A great source. Thanks for clearifying…

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 29, 2017

        The CFR was very relevant in the 1970s – they had a Presidential candidate, Jimmy Carter. CFR is not nearly as relevant today. The Bilderbergers are more relevant today. Silicon Valley barely existed in the CFR’s heyday.

        CFR isn’t a “conspiracy” – it’s an institution. Have you ever read Holly Sklar’s “Trilateralism?” It’s a really great institutional analysis of the global institutions like the Trilateral Commission and the CFR, instruments of neo-liberalism.

        I’m sure that at least some of the guys in the CFR got together for hookers and blow afterward. But the hookers and blow were not the source of the CFR’s power – the CFR wasn’t even the source of the CFR’s power – the source of the CFR’s power was the power of the individual members.

        As I said, MacDonald’s analysis is useful because it allows us to understand the Jewish problem with resorting the Protocols of Elders style conspiracy theories or Catholic superstitions about the “Judeo-Masonic movement.”

        Like

      • Rudolf
        April 29, 2017

        Ther CFR is the basic institute, meaning The hinge axiom of their democracy, Hipster.
        I could agree on one fact. That is, today’s AIPAC is matching the old boss, when it comes to spreading filth and Conspiracy.
        CFR is the mom of the bilderberg, aspen institute, to name a few. It gives head ups & bias to the abominable Intl’ Endowment for democracy, USAID and other filthy tools for globalization. It’s a fact all latest presidents have been praise by the chosenites of both brothels.

        Mac Donald libel is one of the many downplaying the role of the jews and resorting to mere ‘ethnocentrism’ to explain their millennary behaviour. It is reductive and misleading.

        Like

      • Tyrone Trump
        April 29, 2017

        “Plus Jews themselves are notorious race mixers – just like the Mestizos of Latin America, they want to incorporate White genes to “improve the race” (yes, they actually use that phrase, “improve the race.”)”

        This is very true.

        It’s a known fact in a few circles that some jewesses will pay money to more or less random White men to fuck them.

        Basically male prostitution, but the goal being procreation not just sex.

        While they push “White is gross”/”once you go Black…” to White women, they obviously don’t practice it themselves. As for many agendas.

        I once said half-jokingly that they wanted to be the Whitest race left once the Great Hybridization was accomplished.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 30, 2017

        @ Tyrone Trump:
        Excuse my ignorance, but wouldn’t there have to be a massive asymmetry in male/female Jewish miscegenation, given the matrineal social order?

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 30, 2017

        “matrilineal”

        Like

      • Gaben
        April 30, 2017

        @Hipster Racist

        “The CFR and the TC are the last vestiges of the old post-WWII liberal WASP establishment. Yale’s Skull & Bones was a WASP fraternity for rich kids”

        While I can agree that the CFR and Skull & Bones were at the beginning WASP boy clubs, the former a politically oriented think tank, round table type talks club and the latter a Yaley fraternity. But to this days, both of those have had a lot of Jews come and go through them, and Jew influence on them just like on any American institution today is tremendous. The president of the CFR today is Richard Haas, a Bush era Jew who Trump said during the primaries he considers a friend and would take advice from him. The Vice President of CFR is David Rubenstein, also a Jew, who is also a director at Carlyle Group. Another major position is chairman is Robert ‘Bob’ Rubin, a Clinton administration treasury secretary Jew. This Jewish domination at the head of the CFR is at least three decades long, previous presidents of the group being Leslie Gelb and Peter Tarnoff, possibly some others too. Basically every neocohen, neolib, Jew, Jew neocon and Jew neolib is a member of the organization. Every Soros-like globalist is a member. It’s an entry level group for big shots of all sorts from what I understand.

        Skull and Bones is also interesting but it’s influence seems pretty weak to me. Funny thing is in 2004 when Bush was facing John Kerry during the election, a lot of people were talking about the fact that both of those candidates, the neocohen and the neolib were Yaley S&B members. Papa Bush too. And interesting enough, Trumps treasury pick is not only a Jew, a Goldman Sachs and Soros affiliated individual, but also a Yaley and Skull and Bones member – Steven Mnuchin. He also has ties in Hollywood or so I’ve heard lol.

        The Trilateral Commission is hard for me to imagine as WASP since its founders are David Rockefeller who is WASP supposedly, Zbigniew Brzezinski who is WPRC(white polish roman catholic) and Henry Kissinger who is Jewish. It’s roster also features tons of Jews just like the one from CFR and interestingly enough the aforementioned Jeffrey Epstein was also on their roster in 2002 or something like that. This one is a little bit more elite of a club from what I understand, with a narrower aim.

        “The Bilderbergers existed BEFORE the CFR. The CFR is a specific group of people, formed at a specific time, for a specific reason.”

        What do you mean? If I recall correctly, CFR exists from the early 20s, formed after WWI as a sort of round table talks. Bilderberg meetings started in the 50s with Rockefeller, Kissinger and others from abroad.

        All this being said, I would really love to hear your opinion on these books(regarding all these groups):

        The Shadows of Power(1989) – James Perloff (about the CFR)
        Trilaterals over Washington(1978) – Antony Sutton, Patrick Wood(about the TC)
        Trilaterals over America(1995) – Antony Sutton(about the TC)
        America’s Secret Establishment(1983) – Antony Sutton(about the S&B)

        and another one that isn’t totally related to these ones is
        Technocracy Rising: The Trojan Horse of Global Transformation – Patrick Wood

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 30, 2017

        @Gaben

        The CFR is long passed it heyday, and the CFR itself was never the origin or source of power. The way the CFR and related groups like the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderbergers work is by inviting already powerful people into a conference together to align their agendas.

        Here’s an example I like to use. The Freemasons used to be pretty powerful in the United States, and perhaps the most famous Freemason in history was George Washington. But George Washington wasn’t the head of his Freemason lodge – his gardener was. Are we to believe that Washington’s gardener was his “boss” and secretly running the show from behind the scenes? That seems unlikely. The hierarchy of the Freemasons didn’t represent the hierarchy of power. Washington was the man with the power and his gardener was his employee, despite the fact that technically his gardener “outranked” him in the Freemasons. Did Washington’s gardener give Washington “secret orders” and then Washington faithfully obeyed his commands in the public sphere? Again, it seems unlikely.

        Of course all of the WASP power centers included Jews since at least the FDR days. But unfortunately too many Judeo-centrics believe that if there is one Jew in a group, then the entire group therefore must be “run by the Jews.” They seem to believe that Jews are somehow these magical creates with some sort of psychological power that even shaking hands with one automatically turns someone into a goyim, a dupe of the Jews.

        I suspect that David Rockefeller was telling the truth when he explained how he operated. He used his power and influence to organize other powerful people, and representatives from other governments, got them in a room together and hashed things out.

        Wikileaks released notes from the Bilderbergers meetings going all the way back to the 1970s. It’s quite revealing. It shows that there is no “power center” where the “leader” of the Bilderbergers is giving orders to the lackeys who then go out and implement the well coordinated plan. On the contrary, people with different and often opposing agendas negotiate, with a little bit of give and take, until they hopefully come to some sort of broad agreement.

        The entire Rockefeller axis tended to promote the idea that the more integrated and interconnected the political and business institutions of various countries were, the less likely they were to have conflicts and go to war. This may or many not be true. From an outsider’s perspective, it does very much look like a “conspiracy” of all the powerful people to implement a “New World Order” – and in many ways it is. But it’s hardly secret, Rockefeller was quite open about it. He wanted the governments and businesses to integrate and work together to prevent wars and conflicts.

        Skull & Bones is another example of missing the forest for the trees. The hysterical pearl-clutching about Skull & Bones is exactly how people miss the point. A bunch of rich kids hold spooky ceremonies in a coffin – and have the superstitious types hyperventilating about SATAN! Freemasons! Drinking out of a SKULL!!

        But come on – that’s just fratboy hijinks. The real power of Skull & Bones doesn’t come from the fratboy hijinks. The power of Skull & Bones comes from YALE – it comes from the fact that the only people who get into Skull & Bones are the sons of already rich and powerful families – who have already been admitted to Yale.

        If you started a business and became a billionaire, your kid could likely get into Yale and the Bush kids and the Kerrey kids would then invite your son into Skull & Bones. They would make personal connections, they would give each other insider business tips, they may even get together and say, “hey we’re all going to support this political candidate this time.”

        But the spooky “rituals” of Skull & Bones are meaningless. Skull & Bones used to exclude Jews – in fact, John Kerry was one of the guys who pushed to change that. So now some Jewish boy from a rich family can get into Skull & Bones too. That certainly does not mean that Davey Schlomo, the son of your dentist, is getting into Skull & Bones.

        The Trilateral Commission was founded specifically to bring together the elites of Europe and America with the elites of Japan, as Japan was clearly on their way up economically. That is actually the meaning of “Trilateral” – “three.” America, Europe, and Japan.

        Mystifying all this stuff interferes with understanding how it operates.

        Like

    • Gaben
      April 30, 2017

      Thanks for the quick reply, I found it quite interesting. I agree with almost everything you just said, that’s one of the reasons why I keep coming here because not a lot of people today think in those right terms. It’s just way too polarized today.

      As I already said, CFR and it’s days of old glory as an elite club are long gone. Today it is mostly meant as an entry level round table globalization talk group. Seeing how many media anchors like Fareed Zakaria and even actresses like Angelina Jolie are members and rub shoulders with bigwigs like Soros, PNAC neocons and all the FED chairmen it all makes sense. It’s a mishmash of a huge group of people that you could call ‘elite’. They don’t all get to call the shots, but they all get a glimpse of the ‘backstage’ of how global politics work, and that’s the whole point.

      I also FULLY agree with you on people being fixated on Skull and Bones as an extremely important group, when in reality it’s more of a past time for the rich and influential. Just like they get all crazy over the Bohemian Grove. But knowing how these same people think an Egyptian deity called ‘kek’ somehow helped in the election of Trump, the most obvious Zionist stooge, I can absolutely see how they project these same ideas on the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds thinking they are taking orders from satan somewhere in a California forest by burning an owl. Again these groups are merely a past time, a hobby if you will for the elites. Membership means nothing more than the fact they are all very elite and in on the agenda.

      Also, I MUST agree with you about people being too fixated on Jews too. The point is, not everything is a Jew conspiracy. The only cold, hard fact is that they are waaay over represented and we need to play that card the same way they play ‘white privilege’ against us. I’m definitely not one of those people, but I can’t help but notice when Jews are heading an organization, and they have been doing just that with all kinds of major think tanks, NGOs and all kinds of funds and groups that directly affect US policy. Whether their agenda is present or not, one should judge for himself but the fact is they are way over represented there as they are everywhere. People are chasing a dead end and basically doing harm by trying to prove every single influential person is a Jew – I can’t recall how many times I’ve seen people claim the Rockefellers were Jews or crypto-Jews, with weak proof to suggest so. They are missing the point pretty bad by doing shit like that. It makes us look like nuts that really do think Jews are superior.

      Anyway, be it WASP, Jew or anything else – all these organizations are a huge cancer on the white population, and their each decision and step is a one toward our total demise. And yes, they are all out in the open, it’s just that the general population is too dumb, brainwashed and distracted to look for info on them. And when you do look and find out, they look at you and say ‘what you gonna do about it, goy?’. Even if a mass awakening does happen, they’ve seized so much power that an armed revolution would be impossible I think. They are all rubbing it in our faces with some way obvious quotes like the Rockefeller ones about being a globalist and working against the interest of the common man or something like that.

      My understanding of the situation is that the Jew agenda is somewhat split. There are globalist Jews and mostly Israeli neocon Jews. Think Soros vs Netanyahu. One lives right next to you and is fucking up your homeland directly, while the other has agents that work hard on leeching foreign aid so they can wage war, whose consequences again fall on the shoulders of the goys. All this aside…

      Can you tell me more about the Freemasons, and all the superstition aside, their connection with the Jews and that kind of agenda(if there is any connection)?

      Oh and BTW did you hear about or read any of the books I listed above before? Some of those I’ve only heard about, but I thought about hearing your opinion about them before I start buying some of them? Thanks in advance. All in all, keep up the good posts guys.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Gaben
        April 30, 2017

        Talking about Bilderberg, here are two graphs of all the interconnectedness between various groups and individuals. I think the first one was a graph from the 2010 Bilderberg conference:

        Really interesting stuff..

        Like

  21. James Stewart
    April 29, 2017

    I just did a post on this, and I have many in my google collection:

    Liked by 1 person

  22. Fichte
    April 29, 2017

    As the internet erodes confidence in economic middlemen and institutional authorities, Jewish power will recede. Apps and software are replacing the need for attorneys and accountants. Blogs and tweets undermine their hold on academia and mass media. Hollywood is bankrupt of ideas and depending upon the Yellow Tide for their future green. Their corrosive culture of critique is nothing compared to the emanation of truth radiating from wifi.

    I reckon we are at the zenith of Jewish influence in Western culture; it’s not surprising considering how Jewish we have become: rootless, landless and pantheistic. We’re all Jews now. But once the new feudalism arises from the ashes of ZOG, the Jews will be placed in a precarious position: outside the protection of a neoplatonic chain of being, subject to the whims of a monarch to be capriciously expelled or sequestered. The first will be last again.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      April 29, 2017

      @Fichte

      A major aspect of Jewish power was the ability to keep people from discussing Jewish power, it was invisible. That’s just not the case anymore thanks to the internet and other developments.

      The fact that American Jews are becoming less and less Jewish and the core of Jewry is being subsumed into the Zionist entity is likely a good development for Whites.

      I agree I think we’ve already reached “Peak Jew.” Consider that Jews are so hard up right now they had to recruit an aging Reality TV Actor to keep their shitty little state from being completely isolated by the rest of the world. That’s desperation.

      Like

  23. Unassuming Bigot
    April 30, 2017

    Chiming in… Obviously, the problem with Jews is not their religion(Most of them don’t have one) but the way they form special interest blocs that put priorities of a few (((people))) over the average White American. Jewish identity seems to consist of remembering The Holocaust, being a Progressive, Israel and having a good sense of humor. Most probably think of being a Jew as an ethnicity and a race(when they’re talking among themselves of course!).

    Like

    • bob saffron
      April 30, 2017

      Great handle!

      Like

      • Unassuming Bigot
        April 30, 2017

        Thanks! I changed it because my previous handle was too bland.

        Like

    • Great exchanges, I think I will link your site. Personally, I would be closest to Rudolf on the Jewish Question

      Like

  24. Unassuming Bigot
    April 30, 2017

    Have some original Anti-Trump memes, made by me. (OT but whatever.)

    Like

  25. Pingback: Readers’ invitation to “outdoor” discussion | rudolfblog

  26. Hipster Racist
    April 30, 2017

    @Gaben

    I haven’t read any of the specific books you’ve mentioned. But I have read Quigley’s infamous “Tragedy of Hope” which is notorious in the old John Birch Society mythology about the neo-liberal “internationalist” order. It’s quite good and well worth reading.

    The $10,000 question is how do Jews get WASPs like Cheney and Rumsfeld and the rest to go along with what is clearly an agenda that is Israeli and Jew-centric. Even if Jews are over-represented in these elites groups, you would expect some pushback from other agendas. You do see that from time to time – the old line George H. W. Bush Arabists tried mightily to wrest back control from the neo-cons at the tail end of the Bush administration after the Iraq war went to hell. The Obama administration saw some serious pushback against the most fanatical of the Likudniks – that’s why Trump spent the entire Obama administration spreading all the nonsense about Obama being a Secret Muslim with a Fake Birth Certificate taking orders from the Mullahs of Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood. Trump was literally repeating talking points from the Israeli Orly Taitz.

    However Freemasonry first started, they developed into essentially an anti-Catholic movement that brought together anyone opposed to Vatican control. They had a few Jews, but mostly Anglos, atheists, scientists, “liberal” republicans, Enlightenment types, etc. They were powerful in the 18th century. Lots of groups in America adopted Mason style mumbo-jumbo, everyone from the Klan to the Mormons. Post World War II there was a resurgence of all of these fraternities but the era when being a Freemason may have given you some sort of social leg up seems long gone. In England it likely pays to be a Mason if you’re a cop or a lawyer. I knew a guy from Australia that was a Mason. He said when he started his business in a medium sized town, he was told in no uncertain terms he’d need to join the Masons. He thought the rituals were hokey and rolled his eyes at the whole thing and stopped going to meetings as soon as his business was successful. These days it’s just meaningless.

    There’s a Catholic guy on TOO that truly believes that the Freemasons are set up like a “set of concentric circles” with Jews in the center ring, giving orders to the goys in the “lower degrees.” It’s just silly, it’s just Catholics projecting their own hierarchy onto everyone else. Look up the “Taxil Hoax” to see how absurd Catholic superstitions about the Masons actually are.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxil_hoax

    As I said earlier, I think Jews have an “instinct” or a “tendency” to always carve out an exception for themselves in every realm. They are allowed to exclude outsiders, but no one can exclude them. Why is Hollywood so anti-white and why do they always promote perversions, etc? Well that’s easy – Hollywood isn’t just run by Jews, it’s run by *gay Jews.* In some cases the anti-white instinct is cultivated and purposeful, sometimes it’s just them being Jewey.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      April 30, 2017

      “The public made me what I am; the arch-liar of the period,” confessed Taxil, “for when I first commenced to write against the Masons my object was amusement pure and simple. The crimes I laid at their door were so grotesque, so impossible, so widely exaggerated, I thought everybody would see the joke and give me credit for originating a new line of humor. But my readers wouldn’t have it so; they accepted my fables as gospel truth, and the more I lied for the purpose of showing that I lied, the more convinced became they that I was a paragon of veracity.

      “Then it dawned upon me that there was lots of money in being a Munchausen of the right kind, and for twelve years I gave it to them hot and strong, but never too hot. When inditing such slush as the story of the devil snake who wrote prophecies on Diana’s back with the end of his tail, I sometimes said to myself: ‘Hold on, you are going too far,’ but I didn’t. My readers even took kindly to the yarn of the devil who, in order to marry a Mason, transformed himself into a crocodile, and, despite the masquerade, played the piano wonderfully well.

      “One day when lecturing at Lille, I told my audience that I had just had an apparition of Nautilus, the most daring affront on human credulity I had so far risked. But my hearers never turned a hair. ‘Hear ye, the doctor has seen Nautulius,’ they said with admiring glances. Of course no one had a clear idea of who Nautilus was, I didn’t myself, but they assumed that he was a devil.

      “Ah, the jolly evenings I spent with my fellow authors hatching out new plots, new, unheard of perversions of truth and logic, each trying to outdo the other in organized mystification. I thought I would kill myself laughing at some of the things proposed, but everything went; there is no limit to human stupidity”.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxil_hoax

      Like

  27. SharpShooter
    April 30, 2017

    ‘Hollywood isn’t just run by Jews, it’s run by *gay Jews.’

    Spot on.

    Like

  28. Sam J.
    May 1, 2017

    The idea that conspiracies aren’t important and that Jews are losing all their power is untrue(they are losing the narrative though it remains to be seen how much power they will lose). The Jews did 9-11 and so far have got away with it. Now it’s said by some the NWO was in on it. OK exactly how many TV, radio, newspapers or publishing houses does the NWO own? How does the NWO make bank on attacking Iraq, Libya or Syria. I don’t know that but I do know the Jews think it helps them. I also know that in the recent election Trump ran on exactly the opposite of the tenets of Jewish power and now is doing exactly what they want.

    I know that during the banking crash the Jew ran off with all the money from lending people money they shouldn’t, got paid for that, then paid for them not paying and then got Trillions(maybe as much as 29 Trillion) for screwing us in the first place and no one went to jail. I also know lots of kiddies are being screwed and videos of them and our public officials are being taken. I won’t go over the evidence it’s voluminous and undeniable. If that’s not a conspiracy then the word has no meaning.

    Here’s the way I perceive the whole system. The Jews prefer to deal with corrupt crooked people they can control with money or blackmail. They work as a group to control choke points in the economy and political scenery. Their relentless scratching for money helps make them rich which they in turn use to promote themselves and their corrupt toadies who use their political control to give them even more money. Eventually they move their people in a majority of political and financial positions where they control the majority of positions of power. Certainly not all but enough to do most of what they want. That they can blow up the largest buildings in the US and get away with it ought to clue you in. Once again if this is not a conspiracy then we need to change the meaning of the word. They’re not all controlled by the same people but their aims are same. The destruction and subjugation of whatever society they reside in. They done a fairly good job of this in the US as we are now fighting their wars for them when they attack us.

    It’s wrong to blame Whites for this. Doing so is like blaming people who have been held in a dark cave all their lives for being blind. There’s also the idea that most Whites don’t believe that people can be that ruthless and evil and still stick together. That leads to how were they able to do this? The Jews are a tribe of psychopaths. Not all and maybe not a majority but a lot. They have the psychopaths natural drive to do the things they do. The way they stick together is it is natural for them to do so as long as empathetic people are around for them to abuse. Much easier target. If we were gone they would quickly fall in in each other.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      May 1, 2017

      The $10,000 question is HOW the Jews exercise their power, it’s the mechanics of the power. Jews may have blown up the WTC, but at the least the Whites in the Bush administration covered it up. It’s true that Jews were behind the Iraq war, but the question is HOW they get Whites like R. James Woolsey and Donald Rumsfeld to go along.

      Blackmailing people for their aberrant sexuality is surely a piece of the puzzle, but negative blackmail is of very questionable value. You tend to wind up having people just kill themselves or turn themselves in and become witnesses against their blackmailers. The case of Ghislaine Maxwell is about the least surprising thing in the world – she’s a “madame” and it’s the second oldest profession, that profession that prostitutes who age out traditionally pivot into. The cartels use “plato y plomo” – lead or silver – so blackmail itself only gets you so far.

      While it is true that Jew received an oversized share of the bailout, they didn’t get it all – so again, there has to be White buy in for this scam to work. The real question is the specifics of the way Jews are able to corral Whites in their schemes.

      I also categorically reject the notion that “The Jew” is the central focal point of all evil in the world and that Whites are all merely dupes or victims of their schemes. I’m not a Jew Supremacist. Jews are not the only people who can engage in blackmail, graft, and subversion – Whites have a pretty long history ourselves of such behaviors.

      Like

      • Sam J.
        May 1, 2017

        I’m all for deporting them all to Israel and testing that theory.

        Liked by 1 person

  29. Sam J.
    May 1, 2017

    A typical example of their shared psychopathic nature is Ghislaine Maxwell who is by all means a fairly wealthy and well placed women. She went around and recruited young girls to be sex toys for another Jew, Epstein. Can you in your wildness imagination imagine a normal women socialite rounding up girls to be sex toys for their friends??? It’s nuts, unless you’re a psychopath and want to blackmail people.

    Like

  30. larryzb
    May 1, 2017

    One must consider the role the Jews have played in all the revolutionary movements of the past few centuries. Their role in Communism is well established. Their role in fomenting war against Germany in the 1930s and their Balfour Declaration in World War One must be taken into account. As well, read the Talmud and see the vicious anti-Christian verses contained in it. Cultural Marxism is promoted by the Jews.

    It is a zero sum game with the Jews.

    Now, the holocaust story is unraveling, so the Jews engage in banning books and videos by revisionist researchers.

    Like

  31. fuhrerious88
    May 3, 2017

    Reblogged this on Remember The 14 Words .

    Like

  32. james
    May 5, 2017

    Interesting.

    Like

  33. NoddingHead
    May 5, 2017

    Excellent thread, i am only part of the way through it. I picked out this HR comment out for a commentary…..

    “…It basically accused them of fomenting anti-semitic and anti-Israel sentiment. It was a direct attack on Abe Foxman of the ADL itself – the Biggest Jew in America.”

    Isn’t it known already that they need continuing “anti-semitsm” in order to keep the White guilt machine up and running? Israel accuses Abe Foxman of anti-semiism. Thus, anti-semitism is on the rise!

    Liked by 1 person

  34. NoddingHead
    May 5, 2017

    What about the increasing problem of Jews intermarrying with Whites? It does appear that Jews are indeed losing some of their ethnocentrism and mating with White people in greater numbers, at least in the US. Is it assimilation?

    Like

    • bob saffron
      May 8, 2017

      Why is that a problem? The Haredim growth rate is phenomenal; the Jewish core is growing. The outer shell is protective (Jews marrying out of the Tribe, and their non-Jewish children, eg. Tim Wise, aren’t likely to be anti-Semitic).

      Like

  35. NoddingHead
    May 10, 2017

    Sorry I do often drink too much. I am wondering though if it is a problem or if it might in fact be a good thing. I do have a half-Jew in my family and i can’t get myself to hate him. Don’t want to. I retain a fair bit of anger at one of his Jew chick relatives who acted snobby toward me at the wedding where he married my niece (a Columbia med school surgeon). I now suspect their attitide was ethnically-based anti-goy racism and they knew that their anti-goyim racism would never cost them a god damned thing. They had that freedom…

    Like

  36. McZOG
    May 11, 2017

    Read ’em and weep, boys:

    https://imgur.com/a/Qjb49

    Like

  37. Jeff
    May 16, 2017

    Hipster Racist, your argument seems somehow….off. I can’t quite tell where you’re coming from. You say the Jewish Problem is serious, but you downplay it at the same time. You say the money / banking / central banking thing is no big deal / old news.

    Can you clarify your overall take on the Jewish Problem and potential solutions?

    You say the Jews are just like any ethnocentric group, that we should read MacDonald and also read about the phenomenon of market dominant minorities. But other than that we should be wary of “conspiracy theories.” And you argue that Jews aren’t that organized–not like those pesky Catholics.

    This is pretty weak sauce given the reality of Jewish power. At 2% of the U.S. population, Jews are not just prominent but DOMINANT in many areas: News Media, Hollywood, Academia, Overpriced Health Care, Wall Street, Think Tanks, Political Fundraising, Pro-Immigration Groups, Feminism, Foreign Policy, The Law, Psychology, Psychiatry, Public Relations, etc.

    On a per capita basis, Jews are the wealthiest ethnic group in American society by far. And their hostility to the host population goes way beyond what we normally see with market dominant minorities. Jews play leading roles in the debasement of the culture, the destruction of the family, the importation of hostile immigrants, the deliberate erosion of religion, gender roles, civil society, etc.

    You’re right that ethnocentrism drives a lot of it. As does greed (rather than “evil.”) But you seem to be deliberately downplaying any “conspiracy.”

    But commenter Tyrone Trump makes the right point, “People greatly underestimate the power of coordinated groups. If half a dozen muzzies can put an entire city under lockdown with bomb threats, if a group of bank robbers can pull off a raid against a CVIT cargo in 2017 and get away with it, or if 3 or 4 CEOs of an industry can collaborate to artificially inflate stocks, prices and by extension their profit margins, imagine what an entire ethnic group could do.”

    Indeed.

    It seems to me that the Jews are plenty organized. Which is why middle class goyim tax dollars are used to bail out investment banks, pay interest on an ever increasing debt, fight Middle Eastern wars, import and support El Salvadoran gang members etc.

    Call him a crank if you want, but Miles Mathis compellingly argues that Kevin MacDonald is controlled opposition. According to Mathis, MacDonald was mostly published and employed by Jews throughout his career. Odd sponsors for an anti-semite, no? And yet you plugged MacDonald no less than three times in this thread. You seem to be arguing, “look this far but no farther.” Are you controlled opposition?

    Most white people are still unaware of the extent of Jewish power, and the increasing number of “Jew-wise” white people are still cowed by it, afraid of being called racists, etc. You seem to suggest that the worst thing for white people would be to get overly worried about the Jewish problem or to cite exaggerated conspiracy theories. Hardly. The worst thing for white people would be to keep underestimating the problem as Jews continue pushing white America into minority status via immigration policy.

    I really like your point about CFR and Bilderberg etc. that these groups have been powerful at times not because they are creepy/clandestine/evil but because they invited already powerful people into them. Great point.

    But it also seems like you are really downplaying all possible vectors of conspiratorial plotting. Which is weird because you ask the $10,000 question–why does the WASP establishment go along with all this? If you aren’t sure about the answer to that question, maybe you shouldn’t dismiss all conspiracy theories too so quickly.

    Why haven’t the WASPs been screeching over the past 60 years as WASP power shifted to Jewish power in banking, law, medicine, foreign policy, academia, etc.? Why do U.S. government officials like Cheney and Rumsfeld (and Congress) appear to practically take orders from Israel?

    It looks like there IS some sort of organized Jewish power that made the WASPs fall in line. Maybe it’s just money. In which case Jewish control of banking IS more central than you admit. Maybe the WASPs are just useful idiots, true believers in various poisonous ideas.

    But maybe we shouldn’t dismiss all theories of conspiratorial organization so quickly. Maybe the Masons really have been a vector for the exercise of Jewish power through WASPs. Maybe global Jewish elites really do have secret meetings once in a while. Maybe billionaire movie producer Arnon Milchan’s Mossad background isn’t just a coincidence. Maybe the dual citizenship of many of America’s neoconservative foreign policy luminaries isn’t just a coincidence. Maybe it’s more than just unorganized ethnic and cultural instincts. Maybe members of this highly ethnocentric group actually talk and plan together once in a while.

    I also really liked your clarifying points about Epstein. Underaged but post-pubescent honey traps do not a “pedophile ring” make. But a Mossad-sponsored sexual blackmail operation of U.S. political leaders sounds pretty organized to me. Something tells me the Indian market-dominant minority in Fiji isn’t quite this organized.

    Anyway, that’s enough from me. The reality is that I value your opinion and I’m trying to get a better bead on exactly what you’re arguing. My questioning and arguing above is really designed as a big long question:

    How would you summarize the nature of the problem, what solutions would you propose, and why do you think those solutions will work when Jewish power seems to have been increasing for so long?

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      May 16, 2017

      @Jeff

      And you argue that Jews aren’t that organized–not like those pesky Catholics.

      I don’t recall saying anything even close to that. Jews are organized. The Jewish Problem is that Jews are the intellectual and financial core of the anti-white movement. The Jewish problem is NOT that “they own all the banks” – they don’t. The Jewish problem is NOT that Jews are “children of the devil” or are responsible for our “sins.” The Jewish Problem is NOT that they “control the Freemasons” and secretly hold “Protocols of the Elders of Zion meetings” and other Catholic superstitious conspiracy theories.

      The Jewish problem is right out in the open: the ADL, the SPLC, the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, AIPAC, Mark Zuckerberg’s FWD.us, Jews in academia pushing “whiteness studies,” Trump’s Mossad son-in-law Jared Kushner.

      There is no “secret conspiracy” because it’s all done in public – where’s the secret?

      ews Media, Hollywood, Academia, Overpriced Health Care, Wall Street, Think Tanks, Political Fundraising, Pro-Immigration Groups, Feminism, Foreign Policy, The Law, Psychology, Psychiatry, Public Relations, etc.

      You are only half right. Dominant in media and Hollywood? Yes. They are not dominant in academia, nor “overpriced heath care.” They punch well above their weight in political fundraising and Wall Street, but they are not particularly “dominant” in those fields. Psychiatry is an irrelevant pseudoscience.

      On a per capita basis, Jews are the wealthiest ethnic group in American society by far.

      Almost, but not quite.

      And their hostility to the host population goes way beyond what we normally see with market dominant minorities.

      Yes, as I have said many times.

      Call him a crank if you want, but Miles Mathis compellingly argues that Kevin MacDonald is controlled opposition. According to Mathis, MacDonald was mostly published and employed by Jews throughout his career.

      OK, Miles Mathis is a crank. MacDonald has not been “employed” by Jews throughout his career. Only someone completely ignorant of MacDonald’s work – someone who has literally never read a single one of his books or followed his decade old blog TOO – could think that MacDonald is “controlled opposition.” That’s the problem with “conspiracy culture.” You spend so much time trying to find “hidden conspiracies” you miss the real issues staring you in the face.

      People greatly underestimate the power of coordinated groups.

      Hence, the entire point of mentioning ethno-centrism (that’s how they are organized) and market dominant minorities.

      why does the WASP establishment go along with all this? If you aren’t sure about the answer to that question, maybe you shouldn’t dismiss all conspiracy theories too so quickly.

      There is a difference between a theory about a conspiracy and “conspiracy theory culture.” To say “AIPAC conspires to manipulate Congress” is a theory about a conspiracy – one with all the evidence right out in the open. To say “Jews are naturally evil because they hate Christ and worship Satan at Freemason lodges” is “conspiracy theory culture.”

      Maybe the dual citizenship of many of America’s neoconservative foreign policy luminaries isn’t just a coincidence. Maybe it’s more than just unorganized ethnic and cultural instincts. Maybe members of this highly ethnocentric group actually talk and plan together once in a while

      Where’s the secret? Of course they talk and plan together all the time. Again – AIPAC, ADL, SPLC, HIAS, etc., etc., etc.

      So since we have all of these Jewish lobbies openly conspiring together and openly being anti-white – why drag in all the nonsense about the Freemasons and the Elders of Zion? That’s just mystifying what is blatant and open and right in front of your face.

      I also really liked your clarifying points about Epstein. Underaged but post-pubescent honey traps do not a “pedophile ring” make. But a Mossad-sponsored sexual blackmail operation of U.S. political leaders sounds pretty organized to me. Something tells me the Indian market-dominant minority in Fiji isn’t quite this organized.

      Yet Sibel Edmonds discussed this stuff years ago and some of this was, in fact, coming from the Turks – not just the Israelis. Are we to believe that the Saudis with all their oil wealth and a culture of open pedophilia doesn’t ensnare some American perverts as well? Against – Epstein was a celebrity, Trump was bragging about how he and Epstein liked women “on the younger side” and Vanity Fair wrote about the “Lolita Express” way back in 2008 – a decade ago. Again – where’s the “secret” here? It’s all pretty much out in the open. Ever heard to old saying “a politician can survive any scandal except being caught in bed with a dead women or a live boy?” The reason that is an “old saying” is because it happens on a semi-regular bases. The fact that sexual blackmail is a semi-regular part of politics has been known since the days of J. Edgar Hoover – again, where’s the surprise here? It’s business as usual.

      Like

  38. Jeff
    May 17, 2017

    Okay, I get your point about the difference between conspiracies and conspiracy culture. And that so much of the anti-white “conspiring” is shameless and out in the open. And that indulging the most extreme conspiracy culture ideas can be counter-productive, undermining the effort to publicize the troubling facts about the Jewish-led and Jewish-funded anti-White movement.

    That’s all reasonable.

    But I still feel like you are working too hard to downplay Jewish power. And I don’t understand why. Even if it’s true that Jews are motivated in the same ways as other ethnocentric groups, their impact is far greater. (Perhaps because, like CFR members, the elite Jews are individually already very powerful.)

    (You’re a very thoughtful voice on these topics, which is why I’m challenging you. So please take my arguments/questions in the spirit they are intended–I’m trying to learn.)

    To me there seems like a big difference between the Jewish market-dominant minority and the Indian market-dominant minority in Fiji. The elite Jews are actively working to destroy nations, to usher in global government which they hope to lead, etc. The activities of George Soros alone are more destructive, planned, and global than the activities of all Indians in Fiji combined. Soros funds Black Lives Matter protests to destabilize America; Soros funds Muslim immigration to destabilize Europe, etc. (You may say his impact is just a function of his wealth, but it’s also a function of Jewish power and influence. The guy was able to dictate policy to Clinton’s State Department.)

    Why are you at pains to dispute the extent of Jewish power? It’s still largely off the radar screen of most Americans, partly because Jews have been so effective at making anti-semitism the ultimate thought-crime. This market-dominant minority successfully paints itself as an oppressed victim group. The points you make about AIPAC etc. need to be screamed from the rooftops if there is to be any hope of white consciousness and white ethnocentrism.

    This quote in particular from your reply is strange to me: “They are not dominant in academia, nor “overpriced heath care.” They punch well above their weight in political fundraising and Wall Street, but they are not particularly “dominant” in those fields.”

    You protest too much. At 2% of the population, they are never going to fill every single slot in a power center, but indeed they ARE arguably dominant in all these areas.

    Anti-whiteness is THE most salient new feature of academia in recent decades. Faculties are either totally on board with it or to scared too resist it. So the Jews behind anti-whiteness HAVE managed to dominate academia.

    Fighting Middle Eastern wars for Israel is a central element of U.S. foreign policy. Israel is the largest per-capita recipient of U.S. foreign aid. AIPAC is widely acknowledged to be one of the most powerful lobbies. And according to you, Netanyahu now pretty much controls the U.S. Presidency. So the Jews HAVE managed to dominate the U.S. government.

    (Check out Nassim Taleb’s thoughts on minority rule: “It suffices for an intransigent minority –a certain type of intransigent minorities – to reach a minutely small level, say three or four percent of the total population, for the entire population to have to submit to their preferences. Further, an optical illusion comes with the dominance of the minority: a naive observer would be under the impression that the choices and preferences are those of the majority.” https://medium.com/incerto/the-most-intolerant-wins-the-dictatorship-of-the-small-minority-3f1f83ce4e15#.rvxptvbqp

    Jewish doctors are so common as to be a cliche. Jews like Jonathan Gruber and Rahm Emmanuel were at the epicenter of crafting and passing Obamacare. Which, in aggregate, had the effect of increasing the flow of wealth from the white middle class to Jews (and others) in the medical establishment. America has the most successful Jewish population on earth, and, shocker, we have by far the highest prices on earth for each identical procedure/product/drug, etc. (I’ll admit that Jewish “domination” of health care is the biggest stretch, just because the health care industry is so huge.)

    As for Jews not being dominant on Wall Street, I can’t believe you’re even saying that with a straight face. Jews have run the Federal Reserve for decades, Jews run the biggest banks, Jews played the key role in demanding and getting a bank bailout from white middle class taxpayers, etc. The famous “committee to save the world” in the financial crisis was 100% Jewish.

    Control of currency, banking, etc. enables financiers to loot the real economy. Even if Jews didn’t have so much anti-white sentiment, their role in this looting IS a problem for society. If Jews weren’t doing it, someone else would be. But they are doing it. And it’s very, very bad for the white middle class.

    Anyway, you get my point. As you argue, Jewish power is significant. You and I perhaps just disagree on the extent of it.

    But this all leads me to repeat a few questions which I would love to get your thoughts on:

    1) Why are you downplaying the extent of Jewish power? Do you really think that slightly overstating it would have a negative effect on your proposed solution of increased ethnocentrism for whites? Awareness of the extent of Jewish power is still low. So why the urge to soft-peddle it?

    2) Don’t you think there’s something special about THIS market-dominant minority? They seem to be less invested in the long-term health of their host country than other market-dominant minorities. There is this underlying goal of dismantling American culture. (Whereas I imagine that in other examples like Indians in Fiji, they may be similarly ruthless in ethnocentric monopolization of commerce, but I don’t think they are as actively engaged in cultural Marxism, destruction of the family, etc.) Elite Jews also have these audacious goals of eroding national borders, bringing in global government, etc. Doesn’t this make their ethnocentric market domination different–at least in scale and maybe in kind too?

    3) It seems like there is a real problem here. The American elite includes a very powerful Jewish elite which looks the same as the rest of the American elite but harbors a powerful animus against the people they are involved in “leading”/exploiting.

    Rich leaders always exploit, to some extent, the populations they lead. And ethnocentrism is a natural phenomenon. But it is clearly not in the interest of the majority of white America to be “led” by people who are actively hostile to them.

    Jewish-led success in undermining the majority white Christian culture is pretty far along. The internet is slowly waking (some) people up to this. But you seem to be arguing that awareness (and white ethnocentrism) is all that’s necessary to address the problem…

    4) So, the essential questions again are:
    – How would you describe the problem?
    – What solutions would you propose?
    – Why do you think those solutions will work when Jewish power seems to have been increasing for so long?

    5) And finally, do you have any hypotheses about your $10,000 question: why do elite WASPs go along with it?

    The relative power of WASPs vs. Jews within the American establishment seems to have significantly decreased over the past 50 years without protest from the WASPs. And, not coincidentally, the NON-elite WASPs have suffered mightily at the same time (no raises in real terms for the middle class in many decades, in spite of massive economic growth and massive worker productivity growth.)

    But hardly anyone complains or even seems to notice. Why not? Have the WASPs been bought off by money? Cowed by threats of anti-semitism accusations? Programmed to actually believe all the cultural marxist baloney about white Christian men being the root of all evil? What gives?

    If the entire U.S. government seems to mostly do what elite Jews want the U.S. government to do, then the elite Jews are effectively in charge. If elite Jews aren’t in charge, then you’d expect to see examples of the Cheneys and Rumsfelds of the world doing something other than what elite Jews want once in a while. But you rarely do.

    I agree that this is the $10,000 question, and I can’t figure it out. Any thoughts?

    (Sorry for such a long comment.)

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      May 17, 2017

      I still feel like you are working too hard to downplay Jewish power. And I don’t understand why.

      That is a rather odd perception, as Jewish anti-whiteness is essentially my only topic. I rarely write about Black anti-whiteness or Asian anti-whiteness. While I do often write about White anti-whiteness the “Jew Problem” tends to be the main focus of my writing.

      I do go out of my way to distance myself from superstitions about Jews and wacky conspiracy theories about Jews because those tend to discredit actual critiques of Jewish power and anti-whiteness. Too many people want to impute magical superpowers to Jews. Too many people think that Jews are superhuman and even speaking with a Jew will supernaturally turn someone into a “goyim.”

      Those people are Jew Supremacists – they believe that Jews are superior to the “goyims” and that Jews are this unstoppable force of nature – absurd. I wonder if these people have ever actually MET a Jew? I’ve known plenty, they don’t tend to be all that impressive. Consider a Jew like Alan Dershowitz – as anti-white as they come – and he’s rather intelligent. But there is no “magic” to him nor some super-secret cabal of Freemasonic dupes or shadowy bankers backing him up – it’s all rather mundane ethnocentrism, control of the media, and a lot of money and lawyers.

      My goal is to demystify Jewish power which often puts me at odds with various specific groups that want to mystify and exaggerate Jewish power – they tend to be Catholic LARPs and (((Hollywood Nazis))) and the same people peddling flaky conspiracies about Skull & Bones and Bohemian Grove.

      Like

    • Hipster Racist
      May 17, 2017

      Why are you downplaying the extent of Jewish power?

      Where in the world are you getting this from?

      Don’t you think there’s something special about THIS market-dominant minority?

      Well, no. They are a relevant problem for us (or at least, me) because they are a market-dominant minority in White countries, unlike the Indians (although Indians are rapidly catching up.) The fact that Jews are particularly anti-white is well known and I’ve never once suggested otherwise.

      It seems like there is a real problem here. The American elite includes a very powerful Jewish elite which looks the same as the rest of the American elite but harbors a powerful animus against the people they are involved in “leading”/exploiting.

      Again – who is denying this? That fact is a central part of my analysis of the Jewish problem. That STILL doesn’t mean that Jews are supernatural magical creatures.

      And finally, do you have any hypotheses about your $10,000 question: why do elite WASPs go along with it?

      As I’ve been saying over and over and over against for damn near a decade, one of the main vectors of Jew power has been their near-monopoly on the media – especially Television. That is likely how they were able to eclipse the old WASP ruling class of America – and their ascent started at just about the same time as the Television became mainstream and nearly all American households had a TV – the 1960s.

      If elite Jews aren’t in charge, then you’d expect to see examples of the Cheneys and Rumsfelds of the world doing something other than what elite Jews want once in a while.

      In this very thread I’ve given at least three example of various parts of the establishment doing just that – pushing back against the Zionist lobby and Jew power. I mentioned George H. W. Bush, James Baker, and some of the people behind Obama. There are dozens of other names (Wilkerson, let’s say) that I could mention (and have mentioned) many times before.

      P.S. – “Obamacare” – you mean “Romneycare?” That is hardly an example of a specifically Jewish thing – insurance companies have political power which is why they write the health care laws.

      You can see Jewish power in how it distorts American foreign and domestic policy. So: while the oil companies wanted to make deals with Arab dictators, Jews won out because they wanted America to destroy secular Arab regimes. While Big Ag would likely be fine with a guest worker program temporarily importing Mestizo peasants to pick vegetables, Jew power wants them and their anchor babies to become citizens. While there are plenty of white gays that seemed mostly fine being left alone with only winks and nods to the public, Jew distortion created the “gay lobby.”

      I don’t know how many times I have to say Jews are the intellectual and financial core of the anti-white movement before it comes across. In fact, when I point to Jews – and NOT Freemasons, Protestants, “liberals,” oil companies, the CIA, the Jesuits, or the Illuminati – some complain that I’m NOT taking Jewish power seriously enough? Why even drag all those other groups into it? They aren’t Jewish, they are not the financial and intellectual core of the anti-white movement – Jews are.

      I don’t understand how I’m failing to get this across.

      Like

  39. Jeff
    May 17, 2017

    Great response! Thank you! I especially like the examples of Jewish power distorting American policies. And I really like your signature phrase “Jews are the intellectual and financial core of the anti-white movement.” It’s slightly shocking, it’s factually true and impossible to deny, and it is a wake-up call.

    So, my final question is about potential solutions. The Jews are rich, powerful, organized (due to ethnocentrism), and anti-white. And they have eclipsed the old ruling class. This is a bad situation for white Americans.

    What should happen? My sense is that your suggestion is to make white people more aware of this state of affairs and Jewish power will diminish to some extent just due to white awareness. Which kind of makes sense to me.

    As you say, “A major aspect of Jewish power was the ability to keep people from discussing Jewish power, it was invisible. That’s just not the case anymore thanks to the internet and other developments.”

    I’d love to hear more. What are the “other developments” besides the Internet that made Jewish power more visible?

    And can the internet really undo the power of Jewish control of the rest of the media. Don’t the Jews already control the Internet too to some extent? Can they successfully tighten their grip on the Internet further? Is there a tipping point when accusations of “anti-semitism” lose their bite? But how many people will be dissuaded from discussing the facts before that tipping point is reached?

    Do regular white people need more leadership on this from WASP elites than they’ve seen so far? (And I think you’d agree that your examples of pushback against Jewish power are pretty lame and limited for the most powerful members of the former ruling class.)

    And are we already too far gone? The number one value among white people these days (thanks to Jewish influence) is “tolerance.” Whites are supposed to be the one racial group that demonstrates no ethnocentricity. Has Jewish power already completely disarmed its victims before we ever thought to resist?

    As one commenter remarked above, whites aren’t BRED for ethnocentrism the way other groups are. And we’re too big a group to be united in the same way a small market-dominant minority would. And we’d be racked with guilt for trying.

    I liked this comment of yours: “The “real” problem is that Whites aren’t allowed to take their own side publicly.” Great point. Is there any way to change that? Jewish power has turned the entire nation into the political correctness police.

    I guess one good development is that identity politics and victim-status-seeking from every OTHER group, from Jews to Blacks to Mexicans to gays to illegals to women has gone so far that white people will want to get in the game. As a comfortable majority, whites were happy to feel guilt and paternalistic benevolence toward minority groups. But as other groups aggressively fight for political power along racial lines, white people are slowly seeing how the game is played. And as the white majority is threatened, whites will soon be forced to take their own side or they’ll lose all political power.

    Anyway, I’d love to hear any of your predictions for how the question of Jewish power and Jewish-led anti-white movements and white self-defense might play out over the next 20 years.

    And, if you were the Chief Strategist for white gentiles and wanted to help them create the best possible America (and world?) for themselves, what might you recommend for a long-term strategy?

    Like

  40. NoddingHead
    May 23, 2017

    ” You spend so much time trying to find “hidden conspiracies” you miss the real issues staring you in the face.”

    Once again well said! Global warming divisiveness imo is exactly that. White people like clean environments, people! The MsM does NOT present the truth. They present the fake non-science side as “valid too”, but it isn’t valid.

    Like

  41. NoddingHead
    May 23, 2017

    Makes me mad seeing White conservative people so often arguing vociferously for the fucking up of the land, water, and air. In the name of some “Libertarian” ideology, usually (Ayb Rand influence likely) . Heavy coal and oil use is only about 100 years old. It is just one technology, it is not a permanantly ordained way of life. White people tend to have built clean and healthy communities.

    Like

  42. NoddingHead
    May 23, 2017

    I have seen a lot of mining and hydrocarbon towns not only in the US but also in the former USSR and in Mexico. All equally shitholes. Praying to Mammon.

    Like

  43. NoddingHead
    May 23, 2017

    I don’t think real conservatives or Whites should be ideologically and dogmatically and politically supporting 100 year-old dirty technologies that screw up the land. But, that is how they have been taught to act. Sad.

    Like

  44. cartiermccloud
    June 6, 2017

    Let’s not forget the big picture: jews want a world without gentiles.

    https://cartiermccloud.wordpress.com/2014/08/30/the-secret-of-the-jews/

    Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on April 27, 2017 by and tagged , , , , , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: