Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Revolution, Dictatorship, Romanianism, and Transfiguration: Emil Cioran’s Taboo Book

Emil Cioran (1911-1995) was a pessimistic Romanian antinatalist philosopher who lived the second half of his life in Paris where his existentialist writings were highly regarded. Several of Cioran’s works remain in print in English translation; but one book, 1936’s The Transfiguration of Romania, seems to have suffered a fate similar to that of Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together and remains unavailable excepting excerpts. “Soon after Cioran’s death, a stormy controversy arose in the French and Romanian press,” recounts Jewish-Romanian writer Norman Manea.

It concentrated on his youthful political extremism, his outrageous statements about Hitler and Corneliu Zelea Codreanu, the “Captain” of the infamous Iron Guard, that extreme right-wing Romanian movement of the 1930s that claimed to be “Christian-Orthodox.” Readers were reminded that Cioran wrote in 1937, “No other politician of today inspires a greater sympathy than Hitler. … Hitler’s merit consists in depriving his nation of its critical spirit.” Or what he said in 1940 at a ceremony commemorating the death of his beloved “Captain,” whom he saw as a kind of new messiah.

Codreanu

Codreanu

“In Romania,” Manea continues, “the debate was enhanced by the publication, after the collapse of communism, of Cioran’s complete work, including some of his yet unpublished letters.”1 Unlike most interwar nationalists, however, Cioran’s eccentric infatuation with these ideas was born of the absence of national pride – not an uncommon attitude among the Romanian intelligentsia, as Marta Petreu explains in her study An Infamous Past: E.M. Cioran and the Rise of Fascism in Romania: “Cioran’s bleak view of Romanian culture was far from unique at the time. Young thinkers such as [Mircea] Eliade and Mircea Vulcanescu had also been highly critical of Romanian culture,” and “Eugen Ionescu could not bear to think he would remain ‘a poor relation of the European intelligentsia,’ wondering: ‘What unfortunate circumstances relegated Romania to an insignificant position in the field of culture?’”2 “Both I and Romania were quite lucky, for when I wrote about this country I lacked the intimate knowledge of it,” Cioran confessed to Eliade. “Otherwise, I would have published the most terrifying book ever written about a human community.”3

 

As with certain other European intellectuals and artists during this period – Carl Jung or Salvador Dalí, for instance – Cioran’s affection for fascism and Hitler was largely a matter of abstraction and preoccupation with symbolism. Petreu points to “the convergence between his metaphysical premises – irrational, vitalistic, applied by the young thinker to the philosophy of culture and of history – and a reality grounded in these premises – Hitlerism. Understanding the Nazi political system to be shaped according to his own philosophical beliefs, Cioran let himself be seduced by what he saw” and “he declared that Germans did not like democracy, that Germany felt the ‘need for a Fuhrer,’ and that Hitler, now profoundly anchored in the ‘German consciousness,’ had become a ‘symbol.’”4

“There is something irresistible in the destiny of this man, for whom every act of his life gains significance only through a symbolic participation in the historical destiny of a nation,” Cioran wrote in a 1934 article published in the conservative journal Vremea (i.e., “The Times”).

For Hitler is a man who does not have what is called a private life. Since the war, his life has been nothing but renunciation and sacrifice. A politician’s lifestyle gains depth only when the desire for power and an imperialistic will to conquer are accompanied by a great capacity for self-restraint.

The Fuhrer’s mystique in Germany is totally justified. Even those who imagine themselves to be Hitler’s passionate adversaries, who claim to hate him, are in reality caught in the waves of this mystique, which has turned Hitler’s personality into a myth. When Roehm’s conspiracy took place and nothing official was yet known, I encountered many of those who only the day before did not hesitate to deprecate Hitler, now exclaiming: “If only Hitler were unharmed!”

Hitler

Hitler

His discourses are fraught with a pathos and frenzy that only the visions of a prophetic spirit could possibly reach. Goebbels is a finer, subtler spirit, his irony is more discrete, his gestures are more nuanced, and he appears to be a refined and consummate intellectual, but he cannot explode in a violent and torrential way to the point of depriving you of your critical spirit. […]

As far as Hitler is concerned, the capacity to seduce is even more impressive, since it is not aided by an expressive physiognomy. His face expresses nothing but energy and sadness. Because it needs to be known: Hitler is a sad man. A sadness that is the result of too much seriousness. This is characteristic of the entire German people, a desperately serious people, compared to whom Latin nations are nations of clowns.5

Emile Cioran, nd /Henri Martinie /sc

Cioran

“The experience of Hitler’s Germany heightened Cioran’s inferiority complex and his shame at being Romanian,” Petreu relates. “Foreigners, he discovered, ‘know nearly nothing about our so-called life.’ Many did not even know that ‘the Romanian people exists at all! … Their contempt for us is so exaggerated that it makes us sick and tired of foreign countries.’” “Being Romanian is a dreadful thing,” he despaired, as “no woman will give you a second glance, and otherwise decent people will smirk; if they see that you are smart, they’ll think you’re a confidence man. But what did I do wrong to bear the shame of a nation without history?”6

Cioran outlines his program for the country in The Transfiguration of Romania. Petreu summarizes the author’s sentiments:

Democracy, suitable only for a certain historical period, had […] to be replaced by “another political system,” a “dictatorial regime.” This replacement would require a revolution, coordinated and directed by a movement of national revival, an engaged nationalism. We know that Cioran was highly critical of all Romanian nationalist movements, seeing them as reactionary and misguided. He accused nationalism of nativism and traditionalism; anti-liberalism; anti-democratism and anti-modernism per se; xenophobia and anti-Semitism as its single motivating force; an anti-Western attitude; and indifference to social problems. Such objections indicate that he challenged primarily the right-wing nationalist movements. But, as we have seen, he also rejected the kind of national movement that envisaged a future Romania in the image of a peaceful Switzerland, thereby refusing the liberal and democratic alternative as well. As to the National Peasants party, supporter of Transylvanian interests, it had bitterly disappointed Cioran because its leader, Iuliu Maniu, had proven too weak to “Transylvanize” the whole of Romania. For Cioran, the only suitable nationalism, now and in the future, was a “messianic nationalism,” frantic and apocalyptic. It would engineer the revolution, replace democracy with dictatorship, and turn the minor culture into an intermediate one. It would both solve the country’s social problems and ensure the emergence of a Romanian nation.7

“The rise of anti-Semitism in Europe and in Romania during the interwar years provided Cioran with additional sources of inspiration; in the absence of this phenomenon he might have ignored the ‘Jewish question’ altogether,” Petreu writes, adding, “At the same time he never uses the offensive term ‘kike’ (jidan), often found in the anti-Semitic Romanian press, and instead always refers to ‘Jews.’”8 Notwithstanding the fact that Cioran criticized the obsessive preoccupation with the Jews that he observed in other nationalist figures, he himself had a number of criticisms to level at the Jews, whom he characterized as almost a separate species. The humanoid population of the world, Cioran averred, can be divided into non-Jews and Jews:

The Jew is not our fellow man, our kind, and no matter how close we become, the chasm is still there, whether we like it or not. It is as if they were descended from a different breed of monkey than ourselves, condemned to a sterile tragedy, to hopes that always turn out to be false. It is at a human level that we cannot get close to them, for a Jew is first Jewish, and only then human.9

“Cioran’s premise,” Petreu continues, “is that contacts between Jews and non-Jews could only take the form of ‘contempt and hatred’; in any event, you cannot love them, he decided. Jews were defined by ‘vampirism’ and ‘aggressiveness’; they were ‘the smartest, the most gifted, and the most brazen of nations,’ a ‘hardworking people of exploiters’ using their ‘century-old … cynicism and experience’ to exploit the peoples and nations they managed to infiltrate. They were,” he said, “a ‘nuisance,’ and after the First World War they had ‘invaded’ and paralyzed Romania, using the ‘idiotic and degenerate’ representatives of the Romanian democratic regime to establish a system that allowed them to dominate the country.”10

TransfigurationAs these quotations indicate, there was admiration mingled with Cioran’s contempt for the Semites who had insinuated themselves into his society. “Cioran’s portrayal of the Jews is always ambivalent, a mixture of admiration and rejection,” Petreu writes. “He regards the Jews as superior, the Romanians as the inferior people.”11 The author’s mother, after reading The Transfiguration of Romania, told him, “One cannot tell whether you are for or against the Jews. The impression I got was that of a tormenting mixture of feelings.”12 In any case, Cioran declared that Jewry “survived Hellenistic Greece and the Roman Empire, and will certainly outlive the West, hated and despised by all the other nations who are born and know death.”13

In the shifted atmosphere of a ruined postwar Europe, Cioran abandoned his nationalist ideas and settled in Paris, where the remainder of his life’s output was published in the French language. “He who reneges his language and adopts the language of others basically renounces his identity and even his disappointments,” the self-loathing philosopher confessed. “He becomes separated – a heroic betrayal – from his memories and, to a certain point, from himself.”14 As a “passionate foreigner”, he finds in the French language “an instrument of redemption, an exercise in austerity, and a cure.”15 “Tormented by guilt” – because of the Nazi “Holocaust”, presumably – “he returned time and again to the Jewish question, though sometimes in a cryptic, symbolic manner,” Petreu reveals. Her portrait of the decrepit ethnomasochist’s final days is disgusting:

Shortly before his death, suffering from Alzheimer’s disease and receiving treatment at the Broca Hospital in Paris, Cioran was still trying to atone for his past sins. Visited by Alexandru Mirodan, from his hospital bed, desperately trying to overcome the symptoms of his disease, Cioran told his guest: “I … am … not … an … anti- … Semite.”16

Emil Cioran may have been of little account as a nationalist; but have his attitudes toward Jewish “vampirism” been extinguished from the Romanian psyche? The Guardian’s Nick Cohen is skeptical, finding “the antisemitic echoes of the Nazi and communist eras in the vilification of Soros” in Eastern Europe. “They are so loud they deafen,” Mr. Cohen deplores:

It’s not just Putin who goes for Soros. Macedonia’s former autocratic prime minister, Nikola Gruevski, has called for a “de-Sorosisation” of society, as the country’s right uses every trick it can think of, including the threat of street violence by “patriotic associations”, to stop the opposition taking power.

In Hungary, Viktor Orbán’s self-proclaimed illiberal democracy is threatening the Soros-funded Central European University. […]

I could go on. Romania’s socialist elite imitates Trump and claims Soros pays citizens to take to the streets to demonstrate […]17

Two Romanian ghosts, it seems, compete for the privilege of haunting Europe – the “Holocaust”-harbingering specter of Corneliu Zelea Codreanu and that of the identity-denying eccentric Emil Cioran.

Rainer Chlodwig von K.

Endnotes

  1. Manea, Norman. “Foreword”, in Petreu, Marta. An Infamous Past: E.M. Cioran and the Rise of Fascism in Romania. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2005, p. ix.
  2. Petreu, Marta. An Infamous Past: E.M. Cioran and the Rise of Fascism in Romania. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2005, p. 19.
  3. Ibid., pp. 146-147.
  4. Ibid., p. 9.
  5. Zarifopol-Johnston, Ilinca. Searching for Cioran. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2009, p. 241.
  6. Petreu, Marta. An Infamous Past: E.M. Cioran and the Rise of Fascism in Romania. Chicago: Ivan R. Dee, 2005, p. 20.
  7. Ibid., p. 151.
  8. Ibid., p. 125.
  9. Ibid., p. 126.
  10. Ibid., pp. 126-127.
  11. Ibid., p. 134.
  12. Ibid., p. 135.
  13. Ibid., p. 137.
  14. Ibid., p. 250.
  15. Ibid., p. 251.
  16. Ibid., pp. 138-139.
  17. Cohen, Nick. “The Dirty Tricks That Demonise George Soros”. The Guardian (April 15, 2017): https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/15/dirty-tricks-demonise-george-soros
Advertisements

About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

80 comments on “Revolution, Dictatorship, Romanianism, and Transfiguration: Emil Cioran’s Taboo Book

  1. icareviews
    April 22, 2017

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  2. Rudolf
    April 22, 2017

    Reblogged this on rudolfblog.

    Like

  3. Pingback: Revolution, Dictatorship, Romanianism, and Transfiguration: Emil Cioran’s Taboo Book | Hipster Racist

  4. Hipster Racist
    April 22, 2017

    Hitler was just another permutation of the 20th Century mass media cult-of-personality dictator, no different than Lenin, FDR, Stalin, and later Mao. Just as the printing press saw the rise of Protestantism and later Enlightenment liberalism, mass media – cinema, phonographs, radio – saw the rise of these technologically-assisted mass movements led by a charismatic cult figure.

    The modern cult of Hitler owes more to Jewish mass media like the History Channel than anything about the man himself. The Hitler cult of 2017 is very much like the Crowley cult of the 1960s-1980s, embraced by youngsters (and oldsters) who hate their parents and want to be edgy.

    It’s not at all surprising that “edgy” celebrities back in the 1970s embraced Hitler and Nazi/fascist symbolism, including some Jewish celebrities, like the Ramones.

    Like

    • icareviews
      April 22, 2017

      Hitler presided over a cult of personality – that I’ll grant you. The idea that he was “no different than Lenin, FDR, Stalin, and later Mao” is a bit of a stretch, however (and Lenin, backed by New York finance, was an agent of international Jewry and one-fourth Jewish himself – he was hardly in the same category as Hitler). For one thing, Hitler was a nationalist. You could make the claim that Stalin and Mao were nationalists, each of a different sort; but Hitler was the real deal as far as that goes, in that I believe that, whatever mistakes he made, he was genuinely interested in the betterment and the preservation of his people. I would distinguish the 2017 Hitler cult from the superficial seventies antics of Bowie or the Stooges in that the kids today are embracing a Hitler image informed by a revisionist historical perspective on who Hitler actually was. Bowie, Boyd Rice, the exploitation filmmakers, and that lot were embracing a Hollywood-manufactured archetype of evil, whereas kids today are joking about absurdities in the “Holocaust” narrative and learning what National Socialism actually aimed to achieve. You may be correct to label much of this present phenomenon as a cult, however, in that they go too far in their veneration of a man who, any sane person can see, made his share of pretty disastrous mistakes.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 23, 2017

        The kids are embracing the Hitler cult today because they saw “The Greatest Story Never Told” on youtube which just took a typical Hitler Channel documentary and changed the music – instead of sinister horror music, they added uplifting feel-good music. It’s just typical “reversal magic” – since Hitler is officially The Devil Satan © it’s a cheap way to posture as more profound than you really are by turning Hitler into Jesus Christ’s Right Hand Man © – there’s one aging woman blogger than put it all out there with her photoshops of Hitler and Jesus teaming up to fight The Jew ©

        Historically it’s interesting, and it’s interesting from the perspective of 2017 propaganda now that Donald Trump is Hitler XXIII ©. But I recall you saying what really needs to happen is for White people to free their mind from Jewish mumbo-jumbo. Embracing Hitler isn’t getting rid of Jewish mumbo-jumbo at all.

        The fact we’re actually talking about Hitler is just a testament to Jewish media and political power.

        what National Socialism actually aimed to achieve.

        That’s quite a lot of the problem right there. German National Socialism of the 1930, even if you grant that it had “good intentions” – wasn’t particularly well thought out, it suffered from all sorts of internal contradictions, it was almost purely reactionary and of course it failed miserably.

        It’s telling that the pro-White movement has to keep going back to that well over and over again, it shows how spiritually dead it really is. It’s also always paired with religion, either “Trad” Catholic LARPing or neo-pagan LARPing, which says something about the trend and it ain’t good.

        I’m just interested in ending mass immigration and anti-whiteness, frankly other than that I have nothing in common with most of these people. I can’t think of many subject more boring than Hitler and Nazis and the only people who are interested in the subject are Jews and Anti-Jews, mirror images of each other.

        Basically, Trump is Hitler, as they say history repeats, first as tragedy than as farce. While Trump’s cult-of-personality was firmly tongue-in-cheek, they still couldn’t think of anything other than a Messiah type figure – how very Jewish, in fact. That is just the best they could do.

        Like

      • icareviews
        April 23, 2017

        “it was almost purely reactionary and of course it failed miserably.”

        Actually, Hitler was literally Karl Marx multiplied by Saul Alinsky if Glenn Beck’s crowd is to be believed.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Primarius Krone
        April 23, 2017

        “I’m just interested in ending mass immigration and anti-whiteness, frankly other than that I have nothing in common with most of these people”

        Is that the only interest you have?

        I’d like to see the end of all Jewish power over my people. Over all of the worlds peoples. That obviously includes “anti-Whiteness” and mass migration, but also embodies a range of other changes – including dramatic changes to the way banking, media and education (among other things) operate. Never mind the war machine and all the harm that has caused.

        I think you severely underestimate people’s take on Herr Hitler. It’s not just because they saw the “greatest story never told” and were swayed by sad-sounding music, but because people see in him (genuinely) as another option, the highly desired 3rd position. A whole different world-view. They now see that history is not exactly as it was taught.

        At least I do.

        Every government has flaws. It never really had the chance to “fail miserably” on it’s own – it was crushed by the very evil we combat today. If the 3rd Reich had glaring contradictions and internal inconsistencies what do we have? “All men are created equal.” Where has that taken us?

        Look, I get your points on LARPing. But there’s a reason Hitler and the “Nazis” keep coming up every five seconds, and while the Jews might have their own agenda when doing it, but they cannot frame the narrative their way forever.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Hipster Racist
        April 23, 2017

        including dramatic changes to the way banking, media and education (among other things) operate. Never mind the war machine and all the harm that has caused.

        You’re making my point here. None of those things have anything to do with Jews or Judaism. Jews didn’t invent usury, they didn’t invent education, and they didn’t invent war or the “military industrial complex.”

        “All men are created equal.” Where has that taken us?

        Well I don’t know about you but it made the USA the world’s sole superpower and facilitated the greatest living standards the world has ever seen – well, at least, for a large faction of White Americans. If we’re going to LARP frankly I’ll pass on the Hitler nostalgia and instead focus on the Madison Grant and Lothrop Stoddard style WASP ruling class that ran this country until the TV finally killed it off.

        The fact that everyone knows who Hitler is and no one knows who Grant and Stoddard were *IS* the effect of Jewish power. Jewish control of the media has made us forget our own history – and then the Jews give us the (((Hollywood Nazi))) controlled opposition, where you also reject your own history and your own tradition and instead LARP as the Cartoon Bad Guy.

        As a huge, HUGE Fox News/Glenn Beck fan I did in fact read Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals and it’s true, he dedicates it to Lucifer! The whole God/Devil dichotomy is a very Jewish, very Old Testament thing. There’s a great book, The Red Tent, by a Jewish woman that illustrates the technique perfectly, it’s just simply role reversal.

        In fact, Hitler has become Emmanuel Goldstein. Everyone thinks they are rebelling by turning to the Official Enemy in an act of rebellion against the Party, only to find out that the entire Emmanuel Goldstein movement is basically a honey pot specifically designed to corral the rebels.

        The day that the pro-White movement stops talking about Hitler – and the Jews for that matter – and instead starts discussing ourselves and our future will be the day we know we are finally winning.

        Like

      • Primarius Krone
        April 23, 2017

        “None of those things have anything to do with Jews or Judaism. Jews didn’t invent usury, they didn’t invent education, and they didn’t invent war or the “military industrial complex.”

        Wait… I know they didn’t invent them – I never said that, but they sure as heck have an abnormal level of control/influence over all of these fields now. This isn’t a “thing” to perk up your ears anymore? Or are we just supposed to ignore it?

        You’ve spent how much time covering the Jews and how they point the military spear of the US to their enemies? I recall you writing some interesting things recently about Syria and Israel recently.

        To many, that Jews are in positions over power isn’t a thing of note at all. I have to assume we take a different position on this. Or am I not supposed to talk about that anymore?

        When one points out that the Jews are using us to take out their enemies, are pushing White-Genocide (etc), what’s the response? From Jews and non-Jews alike: “What are you, a Nazi?”

        So it’s always there.

        ….And I inadvertently find myself saying “Well, Hitler was right.” (on Topic X, Y or Z.)

        You rightly point out that we don’t have to “become Nazis” – I’m obviously not goosestepping anywhere, throwing mock Sieg-Heils or other stupidity, but in philosophy, yes, I’m much closer to the Nationalists from 1930s Germany than anything else on offer today.

        The “racial consciousness” alone that was awoken in the German people is something I personally find inspiring. IMHO, It’s something we desperately need to create for our peoples today. How do we get there?

        This blog is called “Ayran Skynet” after all.

        Re: All men created equal.

        “Well I don’t know about you but it made the USA the world’s sole superpower and facilitated the greatest living standards the world has ever seen”

        When the USA was still in deep depression, Hitler had turned the economy around and given the average German a living standard Americans at the time could only dream of.

        Fast forward to now and Scandinavia also enjoys a very high living standards. In fact, pretty much every white country does or did. I know this blog is US-centric, but the view that the America is somehow exceptional in this regard doesn’t really hold up to scrutiny. Your favourite Ramzpaul did a pretty good video on this once.

        As far as being a superpower is concerned, you have to factor in population size, resources and geography. When was the last time the USA was ever bombed to smitherines like Germany was? Never.

        So I wholeheartedly reject American exceptionalism.

        Clearly, I’m not from the US. Many of the people I know who have similar sympathies to my own have German heritage. Maybe that’s a factor.

        Grant and Stoddard are unknown to me (I’ll read about them shortly) but I have to assume neither made quite the impact of Hitler on the subject matters close to our heart and that’s why nobody says “he’s just like Grant or Stoddard” when they want to attack a Nationalist.

        If they did, I’d probably say in return “well, they were right.” Would I be LARPing then?

        “The day that the pro-White movement stops talking about Hitler – and the Jews for that matter – and instead starts discussing ourselves and our future will be the day we know we are finally winning.”

        Something you once said is that our goal is to reach the normies. I’m half on the fence about this. What is the exact outcome we are expecting? That the normies will finally reach the “a-huh!” movement and begin to vote accordingly? It really seems unlikely to pan out this way. Actually, Demographics will almost certainly make it impossible.

        From personal experience, I find that it’s a titanic task to convince people of anything, especially in the political arena. All you can do is present facts, and then people reach on their own conclusions. That’s one blessing of the internet.

        But it takes an eternity. If you’re living with a reasonably bright person, day-in, day-out, factor in four years, with the first two years being absolute resistance to break away from the normal left-vs-right paradigm. Mention the Jews, and work in another year.

        Do we have time for this?

        Anyway, I don’t want to get into a slanging match. I’m not even interested in talking about Hitler all day and every day. But I sometimes find the left more honest in their assessment of the alt-Right than them (our?) selves. They see the principles behind the rhetoric. In the same way we (rightly) accuse them of being Marxists.

        Is it possible to embrace some ideas from the past without making a clown show out of it?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 24, 2017

        @PK

        Sure, but they call Donald Trump a “nazi” too. When they call you a “nazi” the best response isn’t to say, “no but Hitler was right.” The best response is, “what are you fucking stupid?”

        People are focusing on the wrong aspects of Jew power. 200 years ago saying “Jews control the banks” probably had a lot of truth to it. These days, it really doesn’t. Jews do punch above their weight in finance, as they do many educated professions. But everyone is stuck in Hitler/Protocols level understanding of the Jews. The Federal Reserve? Good lord people just don’t get it. The Federal Reserve isn’t where the power lies. The Federal Reserve is the effect of financial power, not the power itself. I’m more worried about the two Jews that run Google.com than I am that Jewish woman that runs the Fed now. But everyone is stuck in 200 year old ideas about the Jews.

        The Israel lobby is really powerful – that is a contemporary issue. But I just read someone – an orthodox LARPer – suggesting that Trump is against North Korea because the Jews are against North Korea for some complex reason. If all you have is an anti-semitic hammer, everything looks like a Jew nail. By blaming the Jews for everything you blame them for nothing. The Jewish problem is a real problem, but it isn’t the only problem and at the end of the day it isn’t even the primary problem.

        The “racial consciousness” alone that was awoken in the German people is something I personally find inspiring.

        See? Right there. The German’s racial consciousness was basically nothing compared to American racial consciousness at the time. Germany lived in virtually an all white country – it was Americans that actually dealt with racial issues all the time. Germany was in fact playing catch up with Americans. As any leftist and conservative will tell you, the “Nazis” supposed racism and eugenics were copied whole cloth from Americans – like Margaret Sanger. But we forget all that – our own history – and instead fetishize something foreign. We even had our own counter-semitic movements before Germany did.

        Naming this blog “Aryan” was a mistake I regret, frankly. I should have called it “WASP Skynet.”

        This “movement” basically rejects America’s long history of White Nationalism – we can’t even name our White Nationalist heroes – and instead fetishizes the Jew’s Boogey Man “Hitler” from across the ocean. Thomas Jefferson was a White Nationalist. Abraham Lincoln was a White Nationalist that wanted to deport all the blacks back to Africa. Miscegenation was illegal in half the country until the 1960s! America didn’t even fight Germany in WWII because Hitler was “racist” – as RamZPaul noted, most Americans thought WWII was about fighting the Yellow Nips for bombing Pearl Harbor – the war against Hitler was an afterthought. WWII didn’t become about the “Holocaust” until 1978 and the Frances Cohen TV show.

        Jews want the conversation to be “White Nationalism = Hitler the foreign, defeated dictator who was also Satan” vs. “America stands for anti-racism and open borders!” So – they get the American flag and we get the Nazi swastika, a defeated and demonized regime.

        Can we not see how easily we are being duped by this obvious trick?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 24, 2017

        “All you can do is present facts”

        No, facts don’t win arguments, emotions do. Trying to convince people that “Hitler was right” is a fool’s errand and it’s exactly what the Jews want you to do. In fact, Hitler memes and stupid “Downfall” parodies have probably done more to lessen the impact of the “nazi hitler” slur than thousands of pages of well researched Holocaust revisionism.

        You know how anti-semitism got back in style? Seinfeld, Curb Your Enthusiasm, and South Park.

        It’s the Current Year. Hitler is just a meme now. Not even the most liberal white liberals want to live in a black neighborhood. Jew jokes are funny and the merchant memes of a scheming Jew rubbing his hands actually remind people of Chuck Schumer. Upper middle class white men don’t want to compete with Indians and Chinese H1B visas for jobs. Average white joes despise “press 2 for English.”

        There are a billion ways we can spread White consciousness and the LEAST effective is blathering on about Hitler just like the Jews want us to.

        Like

      • BMan
        April 24, 2017

        The minute that Aryan Skynet tells me to stop discussing jew power and control will be the day the Earth froze.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Primarius Krone
        April 24, 2017

        “This “movement” basically rejects America’s long history of White Nationalism – we can’t even name our White Nationalist heroes”

        I think I can see why though. It never really took the fight to the Jews, did it?

        And from what I can see, they are primarily what changed America. That’s certainly Kevin Macdonald’s theory. Now compare that to the NSDAP. They spotted the Jewish problem good and early. They witnessed what happened in the East and what was about to happen to them again. They fought, and lost. But at least they fought!

        I don’t think Americans even saw it coming. Veterans meekly comment “this isn’t the country we fought for” even though they were the biggest useful idiots ever. Sure it was! So much for the greatest generation.

        By the time of the 2nd world war, the nation was already toast, people just didn’t know it. Just see the comments from Lindbergh and how he got hammered. The country had already “progressed.” America has been the tip of the spear of ZOG for so long, it’s hard for me to derive inspiration from it’s distant and often mixed past. How do we see the US now?

        (Since we like Music Videos here.)

        I suspect that’s how many W.N. feel about it. Americans and non-Americans.

        Related:

        “The Jewish problem is a real problem, but it isn’t the only problem and at the end of the day it isn’t even the primary problem.”

        It isn’t the primary problem? What is?

        Because I think if you removed the loud speaker from the Jewish lips, I have serious doubts the anti-Whiteness of the media and other institutions could be sustained.

        And of course, that great big black mark against Germans. The extreme defamation of character. I tell you, that motivates me as much to comment as much as anything else. It’s a noose around the neck of the German people and I want it gone!

        I don’t lay every problem at the feet of the Jews, but a world without them in power would be much different – better. I think we can all agree on that.

        In your other post:

        “No, facts don’t win arguments, emotions do.”

        Ok, so you’re speaking of the masses. Sure. “Make America Great Again.” lol

        “There are a billion ways we can spread White consciousness and the LEAST effective is blathering on about Hitler just like the Jews want us to.”

        When I think of Hitler, I cannot help but think of what could have been. And I meant that in a positive sense. I have a feeling a lot of younger people, who have had their “fill” of diversity and coming to this conclusion as well.

        We spoke about this in another post. That the whole “Hitler is Satan incarnate” line is wearing thin. “You tell me Hitler the devil was a racist? Tell me more!” Will any of this even matter in the end?

        I recently got through all the episodes of “The Grand Tour” with Jeremy Clarkson on Amazon TV, and I lost count of how many times he spoke about Hitler. He seems genuinely perplexed that the younger generations don’t know anything about the “evils” of that era.

        Am I trying to convince Jeremy’s generation of anything?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 24, 2017

        You say America never took the fight to the Jews, then you mention Lindberg. You could have also mentioned Henry Ford, or Charles Coughlin, George Patten. In colonial New Hampshire, it was illegal for a Jew to enter the state. Even post WWII, the entire “anti-communist” movement was declared “nothing but anti-semitism” by the left.

        America was really only the “tip of ZOG” since the 1970s and it only got real bad starting with Clinton. Before that, you had George H. W. Bush openly complaining about “thousands of Jewish lobbyists.”

        You could have mentioned Richard Nixon and Billy Graham even.

        When I think of Hitler, I cannot help but think of what could have been. And I meant that in a positive sense. I have a feeling a lot of younger people, who have had their “fill” of diversity and coming to this conclusion as well.

        If Hitler had won and lived, there would be a statue of him in Tel Aviv and he would have been given a “Righteous Gentile” award by the Zionists. The Jews are wrong about Hitler, let’s not forget. Hitler was no more “anti-semitic” than Churchill was. Your romantic attachment to Hitler is precisely because he lost, so you project fantasies about “what might have been” on him. The reality is almost certainly very different – as I said he would have been Churchill, a war hero eased off the stage after war time.

        You aren’t American so you see American through Hollywood eyes. This is a problem for all of us. I can remember talking to a high school girl in New Jersey, this was way back in 2002, who immediately went on a rant about how much she hated Jews. I didn’t even think she knew what a “Jew” was.

        Hitler is dead, but Jews and Nazis are keeping him alive. In Richard Spencer latest speech, he talks about the “black cloud” hanging over Americans whites – it’s always about slavery and the Holocaust (even though American whites didn’t have anything to do with any supposed “Holocaust” and Americans fought against Germany, for some reason we’re still blamed for it.)

        In the American context, we had nothing to do with Hitler, he’s just mostly irrelevant. Counter Currents showed an old comic book from the 1950s about “Nazis” making boots out of human skin – the people in the concentration camp weren’t Jews, they were Italians! The whole Jew-centric thing is new.

        My original point remains the same: Hitler fetishization is a loser, not just because of the specifics of Hitler but because it’s a foreign import that really doesn’t have much to do with America. If Germans, in Germany, want to remember the NSDAP, fine. But it makes as much sense for American Whites to fetishize Hitler and the Nazis as it does for modern Swedish people to wave Dixie flags and idolize Jefferson Davis. Someone doing that would rightly be considered some sort of crank – but here in America, Jews have invested a half century in dressing up like Nazis complete with armbands and swastikas to get Whites to go down that losing path.

        Historical revisionism is always important, but if you are stuck in some idealized past you’re just a fetishist.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        April 24, 2017

        “…German National Socialism of the 1930, even if you grant that it had “good intentions” – wasn’t particularly well thought out, it suffered from all sorts of internal contradictions, it was almost purely reactionary and of course it failed miserably…”

        Really. I think you protest too much. They went from being completely destitute to full employment. People were prostituting their children to keep from starving to death. They controlled the bankers and channeled all the productive profit from bankers into industrial production and employment for their people. When farmers were hanging themselves in their barns in the US economic depression the German workers was taking mandatory paid vacations.

        That most of the planet ganged up on them to finish them off is hardly a fair reckoning on whether they were successful or not.

        However Hitler attacking Poland was a bad idea. Could they have carried on without doing so? Could they have gained enough raw materials with the all the economic tariffs and controls against them? Hard to say.

        The most important thing they did in my view is naming the Jew, isolating that they were the primary problem, attempting to deport the Jew and retaining the ability to create currency solely for the State and the people.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 24, 2017

        It’s a good thing they lost otherwise people wouldn’t be able to project their fantasies on them. It lasted a dozen years, the had a track record of like five years of accomplishments before the war. Nazis sounds just like the fucking communists, I mean, hey, Castro actually brought education and health care to the poor Cubans therefore Communism works!

        Like

      • Sam J.
        April 24, 2017

        “…he was genuinely interested in the betterment and the preservation of his people…”

        I agree. I think he showed this over and over. His policies towards the average worker were not just talk he put these into practice.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        April 24, 2017

        “…The Federal Reserve? Good lord people just don’t get it. The Federal Reserve isn’t where the power lies. The Federal Reserve is the effect of financial power, not the power itself. I’m more worried about the two Jews that run Google.com…”

        Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. You’re a much smarter guy than me but that doesn’t mean you’re right about everything. Google and the control of the press is a “symptom” of Jewish control of the FED and the banks. They have unlimited money to to whatever they want. They even take the same unlimited money to buy off our politicians to give them even more money. They own EVERYTHING. After the last bail out they bought damn near the whole market. They own most ALL the productive parts of our economy.

        They can do social media like twitter and facebook because they have the financing to do so. A normal person couldn’t finance either. Do either of them make any revenue?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 24, 2017

        Nah you’ve got it precisely backward. The Federal Reserve is just there to protect the banks from the Congress, and to give Congress plausible deniability for not fixing any financial problems. Libertarians just think if we go to a gold standard everything we be peachy again because then the Fed can’t “inflate the currency.”

        Who gets paid more, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve or the CEO of JP Morgan Chase? Let’s not forget, the Federal Reserve is OWNED by the member banks, not the other way around.

        Google could become a major financial player with the year if they wanted to. Google doesn’t compete with Twitter, Google competes with Goldman Sachs – Bill Gates pointed that out about the tech industry a decade ago.

        As usual, WNs are living in the past.

        “Ownership” is a social construct. No one really owns anything more than they can carry with two hands while running at full speed. The reason why the bailouts happened is BECAUSE there was no media opposing it, BECAUSE the “goy” ruling class was heavily invested along side of the Jews.

        Banking is not “magic” and the financial system is powerful precisely because it’s mystified. The reason why Goldman Sachs pays big bucks to the smartest people in America is to prevent the smartest people in America from competing against them.

        Besides, “the Jews” don’t “control the banks,” that’s leftover Catholic superstition. The real trick is simply that the Jews are organized while White people are not. If White people had an ethnic consciousness like Jews they could strip the Jews of all their power overnight.

        You want to know how it works? Google got good press and Yahoo got shit press.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        April 25, 2017

        “…It’s a good thing they lost otherwise people wouldn’t be able to project their fantasies on them…”

        Wrong again. Japan IS the Nazi economy. They’ve done very well even with many strikes against them.

        You’re wrong about the FED being of no consequence. In the housing crash they got $16 trillion we know for a fact and by using open records the numbers were said to be $29 Trillion dollars. How can that be of no consequence? How can any organization create as much money as they want in thin air and then charge the US government interest for the same cash be of NO consequence?? The idea is silly and farcical.

        I agree that if Whites acted in solidarity with each other the Jews would be out of power tomorrow.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Primarius Krone
        April 25, 2017

        Yesterday was a public holiday for my adopted homeland – we honoured those who took part in military adventurism for the past few decades. I felt it was time to disconnect a bit, so I’m a bit late in reply.

        H.R: I think you make many great points. Since I discovered your blog a year ago, I think you and ICAreviews have been bang on the money on many topics. It’s also good to be challenged on views, and particularly tactics regarding W.N.

        In those terms, you’ve been very critical of those who overly romanticise the NSDAP, or speak endlessly of Jews. You’ve written here that it’s emotions that win people over, not necessarily facts and reason.

        I’ve been at this a while now. In some ways I think “we” have more support than ever (and increasing!) but I’m also conscious of the fact that my neighbourhood looks nothing like it did 30+ years ago and frankly, it’s not getting better.

        At some point all of “this” just becomes like pissing in the wind. My energies may be better spent protecting my family (by more or less adapting to the situation, which I do anyway) vs. wasting my time on things that don’t work or even help.

        So I have a request to make. Maybe this is something that could be reserved for an article (or you can tell me to go jump off a cliff.) I’d like to hear your thoughts on where this is all going. By this, I mean, our chances of getting back control of our homeland and how it could possibly go down.

        I know you don’t have a crystal ball, but if there’s something we are missing in all of this, it’s a cohesive game plan. Maybe we are just destined to be part of purely reactive forces after all.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 25, 2017

        @PK

        I think my critiques have been pretty consistent for a decade.

        I’m always been to opposed LARPers, cranks, cosplayers and anyone who thinks we are going to get out of this mess through violence, civil war, or guerrilla war against the government. The “WN” movement, from that idiot George Lincoln Rockwell who thought he could beat the Jews at the media game with his carnie act, to Pierce, who actually thought he could build some radical guerrilla force and do it “Timothy McVeigh’s way,” to David Lane, who with his friends actually started a little guerrilla war against the government only to have it end in a hail of bullets and spent the rest of his days writing lesbian spanking porn in Supermax prison, the “movement” has always been long on fantasy and violence and posturing as “radical” and short on actually being a part of the mainstream White community and getting normal whites on our side.

        Which is exactly why it’s failed so miserably. There has never been a “moderate WN” – it’s always been a mainstream, barely implicitly white “conservatism” and a “far right wing” bunch of cranks pretending to be guerrillas, with nothing in the middle.

        Thankfully, that is changing thanks to the internet, and I’m just doing my tiny little part. I’ve written plenty of stuff along those lines and will continue to do so.

        Like

    • BMan
      April 23, 2017

      no different than Lenin, FDR, Stalin, and later Mao.

      How you get that understanding about Hitler makes no sense to me whatsoever.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 23, 2017

        They were all products of 20th century mass media. They may have “believed” different things but they shared similar cult status because of the new technology.

        Like

    • BMan
      April 23, 2017

      So, your premise is that there is little difference between all these guys and that the current Hitler fawning is because of a documentary.

      I will be ready to watch the documentary you come up with on Stalin or Mao that portrays him in the same way (especially using historical footage and context).

      You can’t do it (no one can).

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 23, 2017

        The entire communist movement was nothing but cults-of-personality, just like the reaction to the communist movement, fascism, which was little more than a mirror of communism.

        The kids love Hitler these days because there’s so much historical film of him you can add your own soundtrack.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        April 23, 2017

        Fun video, but I just can’t agree with your assessment of fascism as “little more than a mirror of communism”. I see fascism as the synthesis of “left” and “right”. It’s true that the fascists defensively incorporated communist tactics like direct action and street thuggery – but you seem to be missing the point that their actions were undertaken for an entirely different purpose.

        Any thoughts on Cioran? I really didn’t think the comments under this post would be preoccupied with Hitler. I assumed people would be discussing Slavic melancholy or the antinatalist movement or something.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 23, 2017

        I of course never heard of Cioran before, it’s just everyone is celebrating “Hitler’s birthday” and there’s a big Hitler picture in an article about a guy who was reacting to Hitler, Hitlerism, Hitler’s “anti-semitism,” and fascism as opposed to democracy. So it’s all pretty much Hitler-centric. I thought it was relatively uncontroversial that fascism was basically a mirror image of communism. Hitler called his ideology “national socialism” and Stalin called his “socialism in one nation.” Both ideologies rejected Enlightenment liberalism and capitalism. Italian fascism didn’t even have a particularly big issue with Jews.

        Apparently White people, even in America in 2017, just can’t think of themselves as a united group with common interests without something to do with either Hitler or some kind of Christianity. At least in the American context, you can understand Christianity since there’s a strong Christian tradition here, but the closest we even came to textbook fascism was FDR.

        I did notice the “anti-natalist” thing but I can’t understand it at all, there’s nothing there about what it even means. There have been all sorts of weird anti-sex Christian cults, even a particularly weird one in Russia where they chopped each other’s dicks off. I just assume it’s some kind of mental illness.

        Like

      • icareviews
        April 23, 2017

        “I thought it was relatively uncontroversial that fascism was basically a mirror image of communism.”

        Sure, if you’re getting your ideas about fascism from watching Fox News or reading Koestler’s Darkness at Noon. Stalin’s ideology of socialism in one country represents a deviation from classical Marxism, according to which nationalism represents an obstacle to international worker solidarity. Marx, Lenin, and Trotsky advocated a world revolution, not national socialism.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 23, 2017

        Oh sure you know me I’m a huge fan of FOX News, Glenn Beck, and Bill O’Reilly.

        Frankly, Leninism was a “deviation” from orthodox Marxism, hence the ruling ideology was “Marxism-Leninism.” While Marx’s ideology was more sophisticated than he’s given credit for today, it was still all so much pilpul. The first “deviation” was Lenin himself, first when the collectivization failed and second when they had to stop exporting revolution anyway because they were too busy fighting their own unions.

        “Nationalism” itself isn’t all that well defined anyway, even “German nationalism” was a new thing as “Germany” was relatively new and lots of “right wing” types like Nietzsche criticized German nationalism because “Germany” was somewhat of an artificial construct. The “real” nationalists were Bavarian nationalists perhaps.

        Defining “nationalism” is a matter of defining ingroups and outgroups after all. “White nationalism” in the American context was pretty easy because up until the 1950s it basically mean “not black” and the racial lines were pretty tightly drawn.

        But I’m looking at this from outside of the weeds. “Unifying Germany” was as much a type of imperialism as it was nationalism wasn’t it? Are we defining nation by language now as opposed to ethnicity? From this side of the Atlantic, communism and fascism had a lot in common: they were products of the mass media, they tended toward Messiahism and cults-of-personality, they were predicated on economic class which itself is predicated on capitalism, they were both products of industrialization, they were both “progressive” and based on a lot of pseudo-scientific nonsense. One of the things Hitler got right was pointing out that the Communist party was basically a Jewish party and the “ideology” was so much pilpul – he seemed more pragmatic than ideological.

        But Hitler and fascism generally were very much a “reaction” to communism and in many ways it became the monster it fought. Since the post-WWII West is based on the axiom “Hitler = Evil” whenever we complain about something about the modern West we have to turn that around as say “Hitler was right!” It’s just flipping the coin, which leaves you with the same amount of money in your pocket.

        Let’s not forget America had its own anti-Communism with stuff like the John Birch Society that was also reactionary and like everything that is just reactionary it made a cartoon of its opponents and eventually became that cartoon itself. Even your guy here, his wife noticed it. He “hated Jews” and also “admired Jews” because he was simply stuck flipping the Jew coin over and over again.

        You know Le Pen got in trouble for saying the Holocaust Gas Chambers were a “footnote of history?” He was right. Hitler and fascism are also a “footnote of history.” It was never any sort of universal truth. If Hitler had won, he probably would have turned out like Churchill – a war hero who got eased off the stage during peacetime after he had outlived his usefulness.

        I just don’t find Hitler, Fascism, or Communism particularly relevant in the Current Year. Liberalism beat them both, thank Thor.

        Like

      • icareviews
        April 25, 2017

        “Even your guy here, his wife noticed it. He ‘hated Jews’ and also ‘admired Jews’ because he was simply stuck flipping the Jew coin over and over again.”

        Cioran never married his mother to my knowledge.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 23, 2017

        Race to the bottom:

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 23, 2017

        Had Hitler won there would have been at some point an explosion in the issuance of Aryanization certificates, ha ha.
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_Blood_Certificate

        Liked by 1 person

    • Tyrone Trump
      April 23, 2017

      All movements seem to devolve into cults.

      Libs have MLK / Anne Frank, cucks have Reagan, libertards have Ron Paul or (((Ayn Rand))), antifa have 2 girls 1 cup apparently.

      Hitlerism is just used as a symbol of opposition to the values of “western society” as defined by the multiKult.

      To egalitarianism it opposes third reich obsessional hierarchy.
      To “hybrid vigor” it answers Aryan racial theory.
      To the normalization of deviance (non-Whites / mudsharks / homos / transgenders / nominal retards / literal retards) it opposes the übermensch archetype.

      You said it yourself, Hitlerism is just symbolism.

      Not everyone who uses the Pepe meme believes in the Kek conspiracy or what not.

      And if it inevitably turns into a cult of personality, which is the apparent norm, why not?

      Better have the masses worship Hitler than Trump, Putin, Le Pen… or Ron Paul like a few years back.

      Hitler provides a good benchmark for vetting potential politicians / opinions.

      If the “What Would Hitler Do?” axiom was drilled into the minds of every Alt-Righter it could easily avoid debacles such as Trump 2.0, Tulsi Gabbard, Rand Paul or the American Putin (although I would still endorse him were he to run).

      One can’t be Hitler 2.0 by failing to adhere to the original standards.

      Technically it could work with almost any White leader of the past: Aurelius, Bonaparte, Andrew Jackson, Lincoln, any Founding Father save maybe Hamilton, Nicholas 2… even Metaxas or Franco if you want anti-nazi.

      But none of these incarnate White Nationalism, which is how Hitler is defined by almost everyone from Commies to Alt-Righters.

      “What Would Jefferson Do” has already been answered by the media… “welcome every refugee OF COURSE dontchaaknow we’re a NATION OF IMMIGRANTS????”.

      Much harder to pull off with Adolf, even though I suspect their respective answers wouldn’t differ that much.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 23, 2017

        But none of these incarnate White Nationalism, which is how Hitler is defined by almost everyone from Commies to Alt-Righters.

        Right, hence, the problem. It’s just reactionary. It’s a reaction to Jewism/multi-culturalism thus is shares all the problems of the things its reacting against. It’s Tom Sawyer and white-washing the fence writ large. Sure it makes for some dank memes – but let’s not forget for all the internet ink spilled over the “Alt Right Pepe Dank Memes” all it actually accomplished so far is to get White (and Asian) internet nerds worshipping Donald Trump. That isn’t a particularly good track record so far.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 23, 2017

        I believe it was Hollywood vulgar, but I was sorely tempted by 2 girls 1 cup (2 girls 4 C-cups?).

        Like

      • icareviews
        April 25, 2017

        Would white nationalism incarnate conquer Poland and Russia and decimate fellow whites in the process? I understand that Russian peasants would greet German soldiers as liberators, but Operation Barbarossa clearly wasn’t the right way of dealing with a Soviet menace backed by the United States.

        Like

    • KSA
      April 25, 2017

      “Hitler was just another permutation of the 20th Century mass media cult-of-personality dictator, no different than Lenin, FDR, Stalin, and later Mao. ”

      Hitler was a soldier, artist, revolutionary, patriot, and conqueror. He was Germany’s Napoleon. Lenin was the leader of a jewish terrorist movement, Stalin was a petty criminal-turned-dictator, and Mao was a typical Asian tyrant.

      I’d recommend you read William Pierce’s article on Hitler.

      http://williamlutherpierce.flawlesslogic.com/the-measure-of-greatness/

      “The modern cult of Hitler owes more to Jewish mass media like the History Channel than anything about the man himself.”

      No. What you wrote above owes more to jew mass media than the man himself.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 25, 2017

        The fact you included “artist” in the list really gives the game away. I’m not going to argue religion with a romantic. The Hitler cult is counter-productive to white interests, not to mention it’s boring. Next stop, Savitri Devi articles on Counter-Currents. I’ll pass.

        From your article:

        “This, however, would be merely a reflection of the role assigned to him by the controlled mass media, rather than a truly informed and reasoned choice.”

        Exactly my point. You chose Hitler as your Messiah because you wanted the flip side of “official history.” You though, “oh my god this man is being demonized, so therefore he must be an angel.”

        You reacted exactly as Winston did to Emmanuel Goldstein. You just turned the 2-minute hate into a 2-minute love.

        Hitler was one of the 20th century figures that had a cult built around him due to the mass media – Hitler would have been yet another street preacher without his loudspeakers and phonographs and later film. I’m sure you’ve read Mein Kampf – I have. It’s really not particularly insightful or brilliant. You’re really just worshipping an image created for you by the real genius: Leni Riefenstahl (with costume director Hugo Boss.)

        Like

      • KSA
        April 26, 2017

        “The fact you included “artist” in the list really gives the game away.”

        He made a living as an artist. That makes him an artist regardless of your personal opinion of his work.

        “The Hitler cult is counter-productive to white interests, not to mention it’s boring.’

        There is no Hitler cult anymore than there is a Caesar or Napoleon cult.

        “You chose Hitler as your Messiah because you wanted the flip side of “official history.” You though, “oh my god this man is being demonized, so therefore he must be an angel.””

        My main criticism of Hitler was that he was too much of an angel as opposed to the exterminationist that he should have been (and that jews portray him as).

        “You reacted exactly as Winston did to Emmanuel Goldstein.”

        Maybe you shouldn’t put so much stock into mediocre fiction written by half-wit leftists.

        “Hitler was one of the 20th century figures that had a cult built around him due to the mass media ”

        No different from Augustus using poets like Virgil to write propaganda works for them. It has no bearing on his accomplishments.

        “Hitler would have been yet another street preacher without his loudspeakers and phonographs and later film.”

        You can do this same reductionist attack with any leader in history. “So-and-so would have been ______ without _______.” There are lots of street preachers out there. They don’t all become leaders of superpowers.

        “It’s really not particularly insightful or brilliant.”

        Compared to what political treatise?

        “You’re really just worshipping an image created for you by the real genius: Leni Riefenstahl ”

        Riefenstahl didn’t meet Hitler until 1933. Hitler had been a major public figure for a decade.

        “(with costume director Hugo Boss.)”

        Yes, Hitler turned Europe’s most backward and economically-ravaged nation into a superpower in two years because he wore Hugo Boss. Right.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        April 26, 2017

        “There is no Hitler cult anymore than there is a Caesar or Napoleon cult.”

        That’s obviously not true. People can discuss Caesar or Napoleon objectively. No one can discuss Hitler objectively, he either has to be Messiah or Devil. No one talks about a “New Caesar” or a “New Napoleon” who is going to rescue us in a new Anti-Jew Rapture. No one in the WN movement posts pictures of Caesar or Napoleon along side Jesus “fighting the Jews.”

        “You can do this same reductionist attack with any leader in history. ”

        Yes, I reject the “great man” theory of history. It’s romantic fiction.

        “Hitler turned Europe’s most backward and economically-ravaged nation into a superpower in two years because he wore Hugo Boss. Right.”

        That’s not what I suggested. I suggested that Hitler turned YOU into a cultist because of the Hugo Boss outfits. As a historical figure, Hitler’s accomplishments and failures speak for themselves.

        The cult comes in by the fact that he has become a religious figure for both the (((left))) and the right.

        An objective discussion of Hitler is great for people interested in that particular historical time period. Hitler and his cult have nothing useful to contribute to the American pro-white movement of the Current Year.

        Like

      • KSA
        April 26, 2017

        “People can discuss Caesar or Napoleon objectively. No one can discuss Hitler objectively, he either has to be Messiah or Devil.”

        That’s because Jews have used their control of society to demonize him to preposterous lengths for 80 years. Some people go too far in the other direction but there is no “Hitler Cult” save for literal Esoteric Hitlerists. I myself am not a Hitler-worshipper. I view him in the same vein as Napoleon not only because of the way he ruled, but because he and Napoleon had similar trajectories in life.

        “No one talks about a “New Caesar” or a “New Napoleon” who is going to rescue us in a new Anti-Jew Rapture. No one in the WN movement posts pictures of Caesar or Napoleon along side Jesus “fighting the Jews.””

        Politicians are constantly being compared to Caesar, and Napoleon is very much admired by many WN’s. Obviously the reason why there’s less admiration for them than Hitler is because we are fighting the same enemies that Hitler did: Jews and their servants. Also, because Hitler was more recent.

        “Yes, I reject the “great man” theory of history. It’s romantic fiction.”

        Romantic maybe. Fiction, not entirely. Anyway it has nothing to do with your reductionism. Circumstances create great men and great men define the times.

        “That’s not what I suggested. I suggested that Hitler turned YOU into a cultist because of the Hugo Boss outfits. As a historical figure, Hitler’s accomplishments and failures speak for themselves.”

        The accomplishments speak for themselves. The failures are entirely due to the Germans being ridiculously outnumbered (even France had a bigger army than Germany in 1940). Most, not all, of Hitler’s tactical decisions during the war were sound. The allies made blunder after blunder but they could recoup their losses. The Germans couldn’t. Eventually they were overrun.

        “The cult comes in by the fact that he has become a religious figure for both the (((left))) and the right.””

        Culture, obviously, is derived the cult, as that’s where the ideas and energy come from.

        “An objective discussion of Hitler is great for people interested in that particular historical time period. Hitler and his cult have nothing useful to contribute to the American pro-white movement of the Current Year.”

        As long as Hitler remains the devil in the minds of millions of brainwashed Whites, there is going to be no progress in the pro-White movement. Whites do not need to love Hitler, but they cannot hate him. If they do, they will always be the pawns of the Jews.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. BMan
    April 23, 2017

    Rainer,

    What a fantastically, educational piece on a guy I knew nothing whatsoever about beforehand.

    It mimics my own feelings about Hitler and jews in many ways.

    Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      April 23, 2017

      Thanks. I’d never heard of this guy, either, until a few weeks ago. Existential philosophy isn’t exactly my bag – although we do increasingly find ourselves confronted by an “existential threat”, to appropriate a favorite term of the neocons.

      Like

  6. bob saffron
    April 23, 2017

    Walter Eucken, “On the Theory of the Centrally Administered Economy: An Analysis of the German Experiment” Pt. I & II Economica, February and August 1948), pp. 79–100, 173–93.

    – For those who want an idea of the problems inherent in the Nazi economic order.

    To their credit, the Nazis didn’t totally destroy private enterprise or social institutions like the Church. (For all the rhetoric, the New Aryan Man was a far more modest beast than the New Socialist Man.)

    What became Germany was perfectly viable in Goethe’s day prior to unification. The country came at a terrible cost to the people (ditto for Italy).

    Like

    • icareviews
      April 23, 2017

      I suppose we’d be better off with Oded Yinon redrawing the map of Europe?

      Like

      • bob saffron
        April 23, 2017

        Well Yinon was perfectly right about the fracture lines in the Levant and the inherent fragility of the Arab State. To the extent that inbreeding is far less prevalent in Europe, civil society and the State are going to be stronger in Europe, especially in the nuclear-family North, the extended family only a Southern European institution.

        For Yinon, substitute Jacobins. And yes, they pretty much remapped all of Europe. Napoleon led to Bismarck, und so weiter.

        Like

    • Hipster Racist
      April 23, 2017

      @bob saffron

      People seem to forget that “Germany” and “Italy” – or even “Spain” for that matter – were relatively new historically speaking. There was no “Germany” in the 1700s, there was Bavaria and Prussia and other nations.

      Trotsky said that Fascism was the capitalists making a sort of “separate peace” with the working classes. In Trotsky’s understanding of this, the capitalists were the drivers behind fascism and prevented the destruction of the social institutions like the church, the shopkeeper class – or even the family – in order to prevent the masses from turning revolutionary. But it simply wasn’t the case – the fascists were generally opposed by the Church, the conservatives, and the capitalists. It was only when their choice was either complete destruction under Communism that they tended to side with the fascists but really only as a wider anti-communist front. And the actual working classes, which the communist movement hated and was never truly a part of, did not want to be submerged into the “New Socialist Man” and didn’t want their churches, their shops, and their families destroyed in a revolution.

      One thing that Marx got mostly right was material conditions tend to drive ideology, not the other way around. I realize this makes me “not right wing” which I’m fine with. The Nazi LARPers are always accusing me of being “just a liberal who thinks darkies are ruining your neighborhood” and my response has always been, “um yeah what gave it away, the handle ‘hipster racist’?” Evola, “traditionalism,” fascism, the European “New Right” – I hate to be anti-intellectual but it’s all so much gibberish. It’s also clearly a product of pre-scientific thinking.

      All we need is a moderate liberalism that takes into account the biological realities of race and sex, then simply to take our own racial side in conflict. From where I’m sitting that takes care of 80% or so of our problems. But I’ll have to reject libertarianism too because markets are a social construct, and society is a racial and sexual construct, so markets have to take a back seat to race and sex.

      I think everyone should have to answer the question – which sort of trade fiction did you read as a pre-teen? Was it Science Fiction proper or “Sword and Sorcery” style fantasy? If the latter, you should be relegated to the Ministry of Art and the people who read Science Fiction should be the ones running the really important stuff.

      A naturalistic (i.e., scientific) world view that understands human beings via our biology will get us most of where we want to be. But we do have to be on guard against Aspergers freaks as they will destroy society because their mental models are so crippled – there is a reason women hate Aspergers freaks. Consider that Bill Gates, richest man in the world, was despised by women and could barely pay for a date. Thank Thor that Melissa French decided to save humanity by marrying the guy and fucking him twice – now he’s wrapped around her finger and the damage he can do is limited.

      Like

      • bob saffron
        April 23, 2017

        Yes, I agree with that. There is always a trade-off (pace Rand) – informed by race, sex and culture – between personal and interpersonal interests.

        My formative childhood reading was The Hobbit, and my fondness for localized autonomy hasn’t changed.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 23, 2017

        Paris, la Ville Lumière (sorry Bretons, Corsicans, it’s lights off for you).

        Like

      • guest
        April 24, 2017

        Speaking of Trotsky…

        He popularized “racistov” as a slur for enemies of the revolution:

        “The Slavophiles which Trotsky alluded to were historically a group of traditionalist Slavs who valued greatly their native culture and way of life, and wanted to protect it. Trotsky on the other hand saw them and others like them as an impedement to his internationalist communist plans for the world. This man didn’t care one iota about the Slavic Russians whom he supposedly served. To him, Slavophiles, i.e. Slavs that committed the “crime” of loving their own people and trying to protect their traditional ways were simply “backward”, and others like them were simply “racists”.”

        Sounds familiar, doesn’t it, just replace “revolution” with “progress”:

        “Fast-forwarding to today in 2010, the only changes to the word and its underlying concept from 1930 (besides Marxists having perfected the art of achieving the same thing with less blood but no less misery) are that the word’s targets have expanded from just Slavs who won’t submit to the Marxist internationalist plan to uproot and destroy their culture and traditional way of life, to all white people, Slavic or otherwise, who won’t submit to that same vile Marxist plan. Also, those who arm themselves with the word have expanded from a handful of communists to the entire liberal and neoconservative establishment in nations all across the world.”

        Many people don’t realize this, on their etymological high horse.

        Racis’ doesn’t mean what you think it means honky!

        Liked by 2 people

      • NikoBellic
        April 24, 2017

        Some of what you’re writing I can’t understand yet(perhaps I need to read more or just need more experience), but a lot of what you are saying I agree wholeheartedly. We share views on the Jew question, seeing how they are playing the nu-reactionaries like a fiddle all over again. In all honesty it is hilarious seeing how the white kids in America and worldwide today are rebelling against the system by glorifying Hitler as if he was a messianic figure for all of the white race, and not just a reactionary figure of the 20th century German nationalists. Blaming Jews for everything does us 100% more harm than good, but we still need to pack up that issue in an approachable way so it doesn’t receive that kneejerk normie reaction like it does every time some Anglin or weev dude does it. Meme are a big factor, and by memes I mean ideas, and not merely funny pics on the internet but the messages and ideas those pics are conveying. The way contemporary leftists trivialized Hitler by sticking him everywhere definitely softened up that front and paved the way for more revisionism. This is important not only because of Hitler per se, but as in breaking the decades of conditioning. I understand you are not particularly religious and to be quite frank, neither am I and I never understood the stiff ideological state of the average conservative in politics today. However, just like I enjoy reading both your posts which are very nuanced and both some Jew obsessed 1488-types blog, I also have to accept the critique of those same uber-religious conservatives when it comes to contemporary young people, and namely young whites. We may not need conservatism, or old school traditionalism, they are probably not the antidote to our issues but we do need a way to inject some good things those ideologies actually do to a society(preservation of the nuclear family..etc.). Just having a majority white country with strong ingroup preferences won’t be enough I’m afraid. And to top all of this off, I will share a little gem I found a few days ago, and is very related to all this.

        This is an Icelandic song, but before you hear it you should turn on the CC(closed captions). Those subtitles are the actual translation, and not a joke before you ask lol. And it’s from a well isolated insular country with a population of ~300k pure blooded Nordic white people, and they still manage to be degenerate as fuck. There needs to be a way thought out that isn’t some mainstream Christians cuckservative preacher ideology or anything similar. Something well thought out to weed these kinds of degenerates out.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        April 24, 2017

        “…One thing that Marx got mostly right was material conditions tend to drive ideology, not the other way around…

        …All we need is a moderate liberalism that takes into account the biological realities of race and sex, then simply to take our own racial side in conflict. From where I’m sitting that takes care of 80% or so of our problems…”

        I agree with this big time. Yes, yes.

        I was always a hard scifi guy. I love Pournelle, Niven, Herbert, that kind of stuff. I liked the Hobbit but the sword and sorcery stuff never really excited me.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        April 24, 2017

        “…Blaming Jews for everything does us 100% more harm than good…”

        I disagree. Let’s get rid of the Jews first then go from there. When ever you have problems you have to work on the blocks to changing things first and the Jews are the block.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 24, 2017

        @ guest: “racistov”, that’s a keeper. Thanks.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 24, 2017

        @ NikoBellik: The Scandinavians were amongst the first give up their religions to worship at the altar of the (((Frankfurt School))) and State Egalitarianism.

        That video was laughably bad.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        April 24, 2017

        Seeing that sort of stuff half makes me think women of that ilk richly deserve the Muslim corrective that’s coming their way.
        http://archive.is/2017.04.21-212911/https://pjmedia.com/trending/2017/04/21/german-judge-acquits-turkish-man-of-rape-after-4-hours-of-forced-violent-sex/

        Like

      • Niko Bellic
        April 26, 2017

        @bob saffron

        I know, thats why despite being a non believer(hate to use the word atheist as its closely associated with pretentious faggots today) I still notice some patterns and value certain opinions that conservative minded people present. For example, Scandinavians have always been quite resistant in taking up Christianity fully and were in favor of free minded, sort of decentralized paganism instead. Later on, as time went by they became increasingly atheistical and secular. I dont have to explain the rest. Second example are the Czechs. They are, I think at least among the top 3 atheist countries by percentage. Not saying this is all because of that, but it is noticeable how the people have turned into nihilistic, hedonistic pieces of shit over time. For example, whenever I ask one of my American friends about their trips to Europe, almost all of them mention visiting Prague for easy, good looking girls, top notch hookers and drugs which are fairly easy to get. So fucked up that whenever the world ‘Czech’ comes up the association is also porn as they are also heavily involved in both filming their own and being a big exporter of young whored out women who shoot abroad, in US studios. Coming from the Slav world myself, Ive always viewed Czechs as Slavs-lite version. I mean, they dont even have the macho hooligan culture that is in one form or another present throughout the Slavic world, more or less. It is degenerate I know but in these troubled times, its 10 times better than having a cuck tumblr culture thats prevalent among youngsters in the West.

        And to top all of that of, one of the only areas where you have ethnic Slavs who are muslims is where the Turks succesfully converted people while we were under their rule. The Ottoman empire was at one time spread across three continents, including much of Europe but the only place where you have significant numbers of people who are descendants of traitors who took Islam in exchange for privileges, is Bosnia. This fucked up the region so bad that these are now claiming to be a separate ethnicity lmao. It is worth noting that Bosnia never had a strong, centralized religion prior to the Turk invasion and its citizens believed in either some form of paganism or were heretics with different kinds of cults. Populations like these are easier for takeover, and thus I have to acknowledge, despite being a nonbeliever, that you only pick your poison. The vast majority of people we see today exhibit cult-like behavior and its only a question of which cult will it be in the end.

        Like

    • Sam J.
      April 24, 2017

      You want to see what the Nazi economy would look like completely fleshed out? Japan. Japan is a completely Nazi ized economy. Don’t believe all the nonsense about them being completely on the ropes. They’ve lost a huge number of productive workers through retirement yet they still have massive exports all throughout the world. They have a high standard of living compared to most countries especially if you factor in that they have next to zero resources.

      Like

  7. bob saffron
    April 23, 2017

    Knock yourself out guys!

    Like

    • Sam J.
      April 24, 2017

      I watched this movie it was good.

      Like

      • bob saffron
        April 24, 2017

        Yeah, it was better than I expected. I don’t know what the makers were thinking, but they clearly failed in their intent. The end credits were hilarious with Turks throwing Roman salutes at the “Führer”‘s cabriolet.

        Like

  8. Reallynewguy
    April 24, 2017

    It seems like the 4D chess can finally be put to rest…

    http://www.worldjewishcongress.org/en/news/we-must-stamp-out-prejudice-and-anti-semitism-everywhere-trump-tells-world-jewish-congress-4-0-2017

    [quote]’We must stamp out prejudice and anti-Semitism everywhere’, Trump tells World Jewish Congress
    Sun, 23 Apr 2017[/quote]
    [i]I am deeply honored to speak with you tonight, as the World Jewish Congress gathers in New York City with the leaders from across the world.

    First, I want to thank Ronald Lauder, not only for his many years of friendship – and he truly has been my good friend, he even predicted early that I was going to win the presidency – but also for his leadership of this organization. He has done a fantastic job.

    Today we are reminded of this organization’s long and heroic history fighting for the Jewish people. Your brave leaders warned the world of the planned atrocities that sought to extinguish an entire people.

    On Yom HaShoah, we look back at the darkest chapter of human history. We mourn, we remember, we pray, and we pledge: Never again. I say it, never again.

    The mind cannot fathom the pain, the horror, and the loss. Six million Jews, two-thirds of the Jews in Europe, murdered by the Nazi genocide. They were murdered by an evil that words cannot describe, and that the human heart cannot bear.

    On this Holocaust Remembrance Day, we tell the stories of the fathers, mothers and children, whose lives were extinguished and whose love was torn from this earth. We also tell the stories of courage in the face of death, humanity in the face of barbarity, and the unbreakable spirit of the Jewish people.

    Today, only decades removed from the Holocaust, we see a great nation risen from the desert and we see a proud Star of David waving above the State of Israel. That star is a symbol of Jewish perseverance. It’s a monument to unyielding strength. We recall the famous words attributed to Theodor Herzl: If you will, it is no dream. If you will it, it is no dream.

    Jews across the world have proved the truth of these words day after day. In the memory of those who were lost, we renew our commitment and our determination not to disregard the warnings of our own times.

    We must stamp out prejudice and anti-Semitism everywhere it is found. We must defeat terrorism, and we must not ignore the threats of a regime that talks openly of Israel’s destruction. We cannot let that ever even be thought of.

    To all of you tonight, who have come from around the world, let it be known, America stands strong with the State of Israel.

    The meaning of that state for so many is captured by the words of a German Jewish musician. Escaping Germany before 1937, he settled in the ancient land of Israel. Sometime later, he received a visit from a British official, who found him living in a hut, with only his piano for company. The official recognized the musician and said: This must be a terrible change for you. The musician looked back at him and replied: It is a change – from hell to heaven.

    Many of you here today helped fulfill the same dream, the dream of Israel for millions, a dream that burned in the hearts of oppressed and fallen and which now draws the breath of life from a joyous people each and every day.

    Thank you for your leadership, for your service, and for your vision of a world that is more free, just and peaceful place for all of god’s people.

    Thank you, and God bless you all.[/i]

    ————————————

    To you two guys, Hipster Racist and icarereviews, I feel embarrassed now. I got Trumptarded starting in early 2016, despite reading your site and decided to stop commenting here because of the Anti-Trump sentiment. You were right, and I was wrong. I just thought, since almost everyone I saw in WN had a positive attitude(Kmac, Hunter Wallace, Buchanan) that my doubts about his Jewish connections influencing him were overwrought. I thought he would “deal with the Jews.” I thought he’d promise them and not deliver, and he’d drain the swamp.

    Liked by 2 people

    • bob saffron
      April 24, 2017

      Swamp the drain, that was his “deal with the Jews”.

      Like

      • guest
        April 24, 2017

        Trump was and still is good for White self esteem, it’s a step towards slaying the beast that is White guilt, because there is no crossing the bridge without that.

        He is also the dagger the MSM took and willingly committed Seppuku with, they scarified any and all professional credibility they had left on Trump, that alone is priceless! We can’t thank him enough for this.

        Like

      • icareviews
        April 25, 2017

        “it’s a step towards slaying the beast that is White guilt”

        It can be, but it’s only a baby step if that enthusiasm remains unconscious/implicit. I think some of the best white nationalist work right now is being done by Trump’s opponents – Antifa, et al, and, as you indicate, the media. For years now they’ve just been attacking average people and calling them racists for holding perfectly average views.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        April 24, 2017

        I agree and he’s better than Hillary. That we voted for different is blatantly obvious to all involved. Means that next time the right/left differences will be even greater.

        I thought there was a possibility he was a traitor from the beginning but now I’m coming to believe that he is either blackmailed or even more likely that they are threatening him with some kind of evil horrible death and torture.

        Remember what happened to Harry Reid of Nevada and Kerry? You think they were accidents? I think they just beat the shit out of them and have so much power that even Senators and Secretaries of State can’t do anything about it. Maybe they showed him videos of child sacrifices and told him that was what they were going to do to Barron.

        Like

    • Sam J.
      April 24, 2017

      ARRRRRGGGHHHH!!! GROAN!

      Like

  9. Sam J.
    April 24, 2017

    “…The humanoid population of the world, Cioran averred, can be divided into non-Jews and Jews:…”

    The Jews are a tribe of psychopaths. Not all and maybe not even a majority but a lot. I haven’t decided yet whether they are the descendants of the Neanderthals as the evidence is not in yet and the DNA data has been contaminated by Jewish “researchers”.

    Psychopaths do well because they are hyper aggressive and in large anonymous crowds are able to lie effectively to get into power. I think it’s possible that they may have some bearing on the life cycle of Empires. As the psychopaths move up the ladder of power the State gets more and more warped and deviates farther and farther from sanity, think Caligula.

    A researcher asked Eskimos about psychopaths in their population. They said they had them too but that eventually someone would club him in the head and slip him under the ice.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      April 24, 2017

      @Sam J.:
      Have you ever read The Sociopath Next Door, by Martha Stout?

      Like

      • Sam J.
        April 25, 2017

        I can’t remember. I think I have. Most likely as I’ve read a lot of books about psychopaths.

        Like

    • icareviews
      April 25, 2017

      Ashkenazim have Neanderthal DNA because they’re half-European and Europeans, as well as East Asians, have a small portion of Neanderthal blood.

      Like

  10. Reallynewguy
    April 24, 2017

    What are your guys opinion on Trump delivering on his promise of heavily changing/repealing NAFTA?

    Like

    • Reallynewguy
      April 24, 2017

      I guess this answers my own question about the possibility of Trump following through on getting tough on NAFTA.

      http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN17Q10Q

      Trump admin taking “constructive” stance on NAFTA-U.S. Chamber of Commerce

      U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration has adopted a “constructive” approach to NAFTA behind the scenes, despite headlines to the contrary, the head of the biggest U.S. business lobby said in a speech in Mexico on Monday.

      Thomas Donohue, president and chief executive of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, said his organization has been urging the Trump administration to amend but not end the North American Free Trade Agreement, and would not stop until the deal with Canada and Mexico was strengthened.

      “I want to assure you that despite what you may see in the news, or hear in the news, there is a constructive process underway behind the scenes,” Donohue said in a presentation at the American Chamber of Commerce of Mexico.

      The comments should help soothe government officials and business leaders in Mexico irked by Trump’s repeated promises to ditch the trade deal if he cannot negotiate better terms for the United States.

      The chamber clashed with Trump before he took office in January, saying his proposals, especially on trade, would push up prices, kill jobs and weaken growth.

      But Donohue said he has been “very encouraged” by recent meetings with U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson and U.S. Vice President Mike Pence.

      Trump’s tough campaign rhetoric has given way to pragmatism, said Donohue, citing Trump’s softened stances on China and NATO.

      “Reality is setting in for the president,” Donohue said. “We are encouraging the administration to take the same pragmatic, fact-based approach to NAFTA.”

      This sounds plausible, based on Trump’s populist promises that gave way to “pragmatic” solutions.

      Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      April 25, 2017

      Promises are only that; but we’ll see. Trump has already delivered on more than I expected, but he’s not a dictator. He’s going to meet with a lot of resistance from his own party if he seriously pursues that. We may see some token softening of “free trade” for appearances’ sake, since it’s so unpopular with voters.

      Like

  11. KSA
    April 25, 2017

    “The humanoid population of the world, Cioran averred, can be divided into non-Jews and Jews:”

    Utterly wrong. jews are similar to Arabs and other semitic peoples. The world is more clearly divided between Aryan and non-Aryan. That’s why semites hate us so much.

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: