Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Don’t Hold Your Breath Waiting for President Trump to Trash This Particular “Free Trade” Agreement


“Mister, have I got a deal for you …”

President-elect Donald Trump has made no secret of his desire either to renegotiate or “terminate” the North American Free Trade Agreement, which he has singled out as the “worst trade deal in history”. The result of lobbying by Israeli asset Rahm Emanuel during the Clinton years, NAFTA, which accounts for an estimated one million lost U.S. jobs, had its precedent in a less well-known but no less insidious trade agreement involving America’s “greatest ally”. The United States-Israel Free Trade Agreement, as the Jewish Virtual Library’s scribe praises its putative benefits,

eliminated all duties and virtually all other restrictions on trade in goods between the two countries. The FTA was signed April 22, 1985, by the United States Trade Representative (USTR) and the Israeli Minister of Industry and Trade and was officially entered into force in September of that year after it was approved by the U.S. House of Representaives [sic] in a 422-0 vote and a voice vote in the U.S. Senate. The final phase of the agreement was fully implemented on January 1, 1995 when the two countries completely eliminated all duties and tariffs on manufacted [sic] goods.

The FTA also includes a Declaration on Trade in Services, a non-binding statement of intent to eliminate barriers to trade in services such as tourism, communications, banking, insurance, management consulting, accounting, law, computer services, and advertising. The U.S. and Israel also signed an Agricultural Agreement, to reduce trade barriers on agricultural products and boost agricultural trade between the two countries. Finally, the FTA includes provisions to protect American industry. For example, certain non-tariff import restrictions on agricultural products are allowed.


President Ronald Reagan, pictured here with Zio-hooker Elizabeth Taylor, signed the United States-Israel Free Trade Agreement into law in 1985.

Both the United States and Israel have benefitted immensely from the FTA as can be evidenced in the exponential growth of their bilateral trade over the past 25 years. Between 1986 and 1996, the first decade of the FTA’s implementation, bilateral trade in goods more than tripled, from $3.9 billion to $12.4 billion, with U.S. exports to Israel totaling $6 billion. In the following fourteen years, from 1996 to 2010, the bilateral trade nearly tripled again, rising to an estimated total of $32 billion. Over this time, U.S. imports from Israel have jumped from less than $2.2 billion in 1984 to more than $22 billion in 2010, an increase of 954 percent. Meanwhile, Israeli imports from the U.S. have risen from around $1.8 billion to more than $13 billion.

Due to the success of the FTA, Israel is now among America’s 12 largest export markets per capita. Despite having a population under 8 million, ranking just 96th highest in the world, Israel is still among the U.S.’s 25 largest export markets by value, ahead of much largers [sic] countries such as Russia, Spain and Argentina.

Not a single vote cast against it in the U.S. House of Representatives! Must have been because USIFTA was such a nifty idea, right?

Actually, as the Institute for Research: Middle Eastern Policy reveals, the confrontation over its passage “pitted large US corporations, American industry associations, small fruit and vegetable growers and thousands of individual petitioners against the ‘American-Israel Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Inc.’ and American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC” and involved industrial espionage as the FBI discovered.


IRMEP’s Grant F. Smith, writing in 2008, summarized USIFTA’s gifts to America as follows:

Signed by President Ronald Reagan in 1985, the U.S.-Israel Free Trade Agreement (FTA) was our very first FTA. Nearly a quarter century of trade flowing under the agreement reveals a number of negative, yet entirely predictable outcomes.

Adjusted for inflation the agreement has delivered a $62.65 billion dollar cumulative American trade deficit with Israel. Trade, roughly at parity before the agreement was penned, shifted in favor of Israeli exports to the US by the early 1990s. This imbalance accelerated after the post 9/11 economic downturn. It is likely to be permanent. Net losses follow unfavorable terms embedded in the treaty at the insistence of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the lead organization of Israel’s lobby in the United States.

The selection of Israel for the first agreement made little sense […] important trading partners such as Canada, Mexico and even Colombia had much more to offer the US in terms of comparative advantage. However, AIPAC successfully pushed Israel to the front of the line. […]


Grant F. Smith

Footwear Industry Association executive vice president Fawn Evenson characterized AIPAC’s lobbying as “heavy handed”. Footwear wasn’t the only manufacturing industry disadvantaged. Provisions within the agreement immediately lowered all US tariffs on Israeli manufactured goods. However Israel was allowed to protect its own domestic industries through a floating 20% customs duty on any US import of its choosing. While in hindsight these provisions appear to be the result of savvy negotiating by Israel and its US lobby, an incident investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation suggests covert factors at work.

Israel negotiated with illegally obtained material [and] inside information about US industries. The FBI found AIPAC in possession of classified documents outlining the entire US negotiating position.  The document in question, a report from the International Trade Commission to US Trade Representative William E. Brock contained proprietary data provided by US corporations under conditions of strict confidentiality. The trade document also outlined how far the US was willing to go in concessions and demands. Its possession by Israel and AIPAC provided an unfair advantage that was subsequently embedded in the FTA.

No charges were filed against AIPAC which confirmed possession and return of the classified documents […]

“A 25 year review about how the agreement was crafted, its parameters and results,” Smith concludes, “should lead to the cancellation of this treaty.” What Smith fails to take into consideration, however, is that “we have already reached the days of the Messiah” with the anointment of Trump, as Israel’s Interior Minister Arye Deri elucidates. “Therefore, we are really in the era of the birth pangs of the Messiah when everything has been flipped to the good of the Jewish people.”

Rainer Chlodwig von K.


About icareviews

Author, Protocols of the Elders of Zanuck: Psychological Warfare and Filth at the Movies

20 comments on “Don’t Hold Your Breath Waiting for President Trump to Trash This Particular “Free Trade” Agreement

  1. icareviews
    January 13, 2017

    Reblogged this on icareviews.


    • Hipster Racist
      January 14, 2017

      I think it’s more fair to say that W was a deliberate copy of Reagan’s persona. Much was made at the time that while W was going out of his way to LARP as Reagan – W’s famous “ranch” was almost literally a Hollywood set created to mimic Reagan’s ranch (even Laura Bush openly mocked W’s pretense at being a cowboy) – W’s inner circle was originally more a Bush Sr. production until the neo-cons fully took over.

      Reagan himself seemed to be, basically, an actor that was hired to put a face on a motley crew of globalist oligarchs.

      People always forget that very early in Reagan’s term he was shot by a Bush family retainer and if the assassination attempt was successful, Bush Sr. would have become President a whole lot earlier. From that point on, Reagan himself was hunkered down with Nancy consulting with astrologers to find out when the next assassination attempt would come. Reagan’s loyalists were sidelined after the infamous “I’m in charge here” speech and informal power was centralized in the George H. W. Bush faction.

      Reagan was just trotted out for speeches and jokes after that. It was so comical the news media would show Reagan dozing off during meetings with the Soviets. But Reagan could read jokes from a cue card like a master and the public ate it up.

      Liked by 1 person

      • bob saffron
        January 14, 2017

        What a classic that track is.


  2. bob saffron
    January 13, 2017

    NAFTA also devastated the small Mexican farmer, who then walked across the border or stayed home and joined the Cartel.

    Reagan when he still had all his faculties.


    • icareviews
      January 14, 2017

      Reagan was a horrible person. I read an account recently of his unprovoked attack on Libya, which killed dozens of innocent people without the least justification. He was the proto-W.


      • bob saffron
        January 14, 2017

        What are you thoughts on the bombing of La Belle in Berlin, casus belli for the reprisal? I’ve read accounts I feel credible that has Mossad and CIA as chief instigators.


      • icareviews
        January 14, 2017

        I haven’t read enough about it to say; but it seems a little too convenient for those with a chip on their shoulders against Gaddafi. Only Thatcher supported Reagan’s actions out of all the European leaders. European police officials insisted there was no evidence connecting the incident to Libya. The U.S. produced some intercepted telexes that supposedly could be construed as referencing a terrorist attack, but given intelligence agencies’ and Zionists’ track record in such matters, I’m highly skeptical of the U.S. claims.


      • bob saffron
        January 15, 2017

        I certainly don’t believe Lockerbie to have been the work of the Libyans.

        Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: Don’t Hold Your Breath Waiting for President Trump to Trash This Particular “Free Trade” Agreement | Aryan Skynet | rudolfblog

  4. guest
    January 14, 2017

    The best is yet to come, from this YouTube radio interview:
    Trump’s Washington and the Israel Lobby – Takes on the World

    “Grant F. Smith examines likely developments in Israel-US relations under Trump such as more secrecy, no daylight between the two countries, eliminate waiver problems for Israeli visitors; make no attempt to restart a ‘peace process’ while endorsing expansion of Jewish settlements. That he will ignore the section of Obama’s MOU with Israel which will provide Israel with $38 billion in arms over the next decade that would prevent Israel from asking Congress for more money, suggesting that Pres. Trump will raise the annual figure to from $6 billion to $10 billion.

    Domestically, he will make it more difficult for BDS campaigners as many states are already doing whether or not Sessions is confirmed as AG. He will make tax-exempt money transfers to Israel from Jewish charities more opaque even as they are expanding.

    He thinks that Trump is likely to overturn the Iran nuclear deal as well as recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital which will lock him in with the growing number of Christian evangelicals ignoring criticism from US allies.

    He cites poll that indicates positions of Republicans toward aid to Israel significantly different than that of Democrats with Repubs supporting more aid and Democrats less.

    In discussion of Israel’s influence in states and cities, he mentions the role of Jewish Community Relations Councils within Jewish federations that actively lobby local and state politicians to take actions or pass bills on Israel’s behalf and how major Jewish organizations augment the work of their counterparts in the federal government, such as the ADL which has become intertwined with the FBI and the American Jewish Congress, the Lobby’s foreign policy arm with the State Dept.”

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      January 14, 2017

      That is what we get for putting a Likud stooge in the White House – a literal cuck that married off every last one of his children to Israelis and whose son-in-law is the son of a well known Mossad spy that had already placed sex assets into US government.

      Can we be honest here? Does anyone actually believe that Russia does NOT have video tapes of Trump cavorting with Russian hookers, watersports or no? Apparently, back in the 2000s Trump was quite open about all the fun he had visiting Moscow and the Russian girls that “didn’t have any morals.”

      I would be SHOCKED if there are no sex tapes of Trump. I would be SHOCKED if Trump hadn’t have availed himself of Epstein’s underage prostitutes. I would be SHOCKED if he’s not being blackmailed from St. Petersburg to Tel Aviv.


  5. KSA
    January 14, 2017

    For the past couple weeks I’ve been feeling really shitty for voting for Trump. It’s not that I believed he would actually build a wall or smash the grip the jews have on America, but I did think he would at least throw a wrench into the works and maybe inspire European leaders to be more assertive. Doesn’t look like that’s happening.

    So yeah, some serious buyer’s remorse here. I’m not saying Hillary should have won, I just think I should have stayed home on election day the way I had for the previous past elections.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hipster Racist
      January 14, 2017


      I don’t really have any problem with people voting for Trump or supporting him – I would have.

      My problem has always been people promoting obvious lies about Trump, the weird homoerotic cult-of-personality around him and all the “God Emperor” stuff. Willing blindness to the public facts that were all well known about Trump – a public record that I’m proud to say that AryanSkynet took a lot of heat for pointing out.

      We lost three writers over that – a cowardly sell-out by people I had thought better of. But you can’t interrupt people in the middle of their masturbation sessions and expect to not get a hostile reaction.

      So I guess now we can finally say “we told you so.”

      If the pro-White crowd gets their shit together, stop letting the obvious JIDF shills like the (((Daily Stormer))) run roughshod over the “movement” and start putting some serious pressure on the Trump administration – we could, in fact, start making purses out of sow ears.

      Anyone get the news last night? The entire crowd has been outed by the anti-fa – and yep – it’s just as bad as we all feared. Looks like IS, in fact, run by New York Jews and shabbos goyim posing as “Naaaaaazis!” and all it took was ONE guy getting doxxed and he ratted out the rest of them. *

      I’ve been saying it for YEARS folks – 100% of “neo-Nazis” are actually Jews and their employees. The two big time “neo-Nazi” groups – (((DailyStormer))) and – have now been outed as the exact kind of outfit I’ve been warning about.

      Hipster Racist is ALWAYS right – you can take that to the bank.

      * Apparently was trying to sneak some Jews and homos in the back door and the more “hard core” types objected, which led to infighting that eventually made its way to anti-fa which of course took advantage of the situation.

      Colin Liddell was 100% correct – posing as more “hard core” than you really are always leads to an inauthentic psychological state that quite often leads people to undermine themselves. Just like guilty people wind up making “mistakes” that are actually their subconscious undermining them because the cognitive dissonance needs to be relieved by confession.

      I have been vindicated – when I stopped the (((Daily Stormer))) attempts to co-opt AryanSkynet two years ago I got all sorts of shit for it, but as usual my instincts proved correct.


      • Sam J.
        January 16, 2017

        If it’s true that Trump is completely owned by the Jews then it’s very, very bad. Hillary would have created an instant allergic reaction but Trump will be able to get a lot of things done we don’t want done.

        I don’t understand the CIA’s reaction to him. Especially the amateurish way they seem to be going about it.


      • KSA
        January 16, 2017

        Trump doesn’t need to be owned by jews, as he’s wealthy enough on his own. He just needs to be naturally-submissive and/or sympathetic to jews. He’s spent his entire life around them, so he’s probably been molded by them to some extent. Obviously his over-the-top mannerisms and way of speaking are very jewy.


      • deutschefolkhero
        January 21, 2017

        Seems to me a bit like Seems to me the CIA/Trump battle smells a little like an oldschool gang war. The drug running half of the US intelligence services (Clinton, Mena, Iran-Contra, Sandinistas etc) wound up, by virtue of Trump getting the GOP nom, ran headfirst into their “only a little illegal” corporate malfeasance half. Trump and company being prideful bastards, Clinton having an extensive bribery network that assured her she’d win no matter what, these two prideful beasts refused to back down to each other. It was the shadow gov playing chicken against itself. The drug runners have full control of the left, and the AIPAC/corporate/israel lobbies the right. In order to not break kayfabe (since I notice some around here like their wrestling comparisons) neither one could stand to back down or the entire operation is revealed to the public.

        My guess is with falling voting participation, it was getting harder and harder to keep up the ruse to the 65% apathetic lost souls not voting. The “First Black President OMG” gimmick of Obama’s first term created a major boost, but it flopped after he turned out to be completely spineless.
        Hence the ploy to use populists to shore up voting numbers on either side and ‘hook’ them into the game.
        Originally they would both lose in the primaries and those new voters would reluctantly vote for the prime pre-selected candidate. But due to Trump’s pride and hatred of the Bushes, he couldn’t comprehend throwing it like he was supposed to.
        So now on the illegal operations side, you’ve got a major panic. Most think it would be best to continue with the original plan, but the savvy old fart Sanders and his campaign realised she really COULD get slaughtered by this momentum, and wound up losing the DNC his own supporters by trying to steal the show.

        While the CIA wins either way, they really wanted Clinton because they weren’t finished in Syria and South America yet. The ‘illegal activities’ side of the shadow gov had expected at least one more term. So a lot of in-progress operations just got fouled up. Trump is exactly the kind of guy to tell himself and then BELIEVE he’s ‘made it this way all on his own” so he doesn’t think he owes any of them at all.

        There’s one serious danger to be aware of though, that I don’t think people are bringing up enough. Sanders’ success shows they have successfully diluted communism to the public enough that a large minority is 100% on board with electing a bolshie prez, this being from BOTH parties. Got to keep an eye out for someone that might become an authentic Sanders and intercept them.

        If you’re wondering about the Trump-Bush thing, in order to save his own ass, Bush and Cheney leaned on the 9/11 commission to find fault with one of the contractors rather than a government-run security checkpoint. They picked Argenbright Security and fined them out of business. The CEO attempted to commit suicide but was stopped by Trump. The two of them knew each other from this random PR event Trump staged in Georgia where he ran a fundraiser to save some old lady’s farm. So it wasn’t 9/11 specifically like he was saying in the debates, but what came after that set him on the warpath against Jeb. While they’re all working together, he very obviously went off script, and now the CIA is trying to reprimand him for that.
        A lot of people had back up plans made ‘just in case’ of course, hence the yuuge market bounce in spite of his win. But he’s still an asset that went rogue, so they’ve got to find a way to make an example out of him. But he’s just not the type to go quietly, so we’ve got this messy fight where Trump thinks they should back down and get bent since “he won” and the CIA thinks he should tone it down and stop pandering to his followers because it’s bringing a lot of heat where they don’t want it. He’s lived amongst jews so long he fully absorbed their concept of ‘chutzpah.’

        On another level, it’s also a fight between the FBI and CIA, not for control of the country, but their own prestige and credibility in the eyes of the public.Note that many of those on Trump’s campaign or selected for his office are pretty big on the domestic “Law and Order” (federal) side like Jeff Sessions and Giuliani.


      • icareviews
        January 21, 2017

        I enjoy “shadow gov playing chicken against itself” as a metaphor for Trump’s unexpected win.


  6. Pingback: Don’t Hold Your Breath Waiting for President Trump to Trash This Particular “Free Trade” Agreement | Hipster Racist

  7. Pingback: Soviet Nostalgia | Aryan Skynet

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: