Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Open Thread: Trump to Restructure Intel Agencies and the CIA

Donald Trump Plans Revamp of Top U.S. Spy Agency

President-elect works on restructuring Office of the Director of National Intelligence, tweets again his doubts that Russia hacked Democrats

http://www.wsj.com/articles/lawmakers-officials-frown-on-donald-trumps-dismissal-of-u-s-intelligence-1483554450

What is significant about the Office of the Director of National Intelligence is that it was part of the vast restructuring of the intelligence agencies that took place after the “failures” of September 11, 2001 – as was the creation of the Department of Homeland Security.

https://infogalactic.com/info/Director_of_National_Intelligence

psyops
At the time, the CIA was somewhat downgraded, even though the Director of Central Intelligence did retain a direct line to the President.

So, was the creation of the Director of National Intelligence a needed restructuring of the Intelligence Community to prevent the failures (or subversion) that led to 9/11? Or was the creation of the DNI actually a consequence of neo-conservative subversion and a gelding of the presumably patriotic faction of the IC?

Trump – despite his long standing connections to CIA connected businesses – is also expected to restructure the CIA. Is Trump the new JFK, or is this a sinister Mossad plot?

One of the people familiar with Mr. Trump’s planning said advisers also are working on a plan to restructure the Central Intelligence Agency, cutting back on staffing at its Virginia headquarters and pushing more people out into field posts around the world. The CIA declined to comment.

Advertisements

76 comments on “Open Thread: Trump to Restructure Intel Agencies and the CIA

  1. Pingback: Open Thread: Trump to Restructure Intel Agencies and the CIA | Hipster Racist

  2. Hipster Racist
    January 4, 2017

    Like

  3. Hipster Racist
    January 4, 2017

    Like

  4. Hipster Racist
    January 4, 2017

    New CIA Director: Presbyterian

    https://infogalactic.com/info/Mike_Pompeo

    New DNI: Presbyterian

    https://infogalactic.com/info/Dan_Coats

    President Elect: Presbyterian (well …)

    https://infogalactic.com/info/Donald_Trump#Religious_views

    Can’t figure out what Mike Flynn is, just that he’s anti-Muslim.

    Interesting as well, of the 50 GOP NatSec people that wrote a letter saying they wouldn’t vote for Trump, I notice two very interesting names:

    Dov Zakheim (The Rabbi in charge of the Pentagon on 9/11.)

    Philip Zellikow (The “Fixer” of the 9/11 Commission.)

    Liked by 1 person

  5. icareviews
    January 5, 2017

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  6. icareviews
    January 5, 2017

    In the aftermath of 9/11, the CIA was one of the obstacles standing in the way of the neoconservatives’ plan to take down Saddam Hussein. George Tenet initially mocked the “Feith-based intelligence” being used to connect Iraq to Al Qaeda, but he was on good terms with President Bush and eventually had a change of heart with regard to the war. Numerous CIA analysts were opposed, however, and were personally pressured by Dick Cheney and others in the war party to come up with material they could use to sell the war. One of the neoconservatives’ strategies, which worked, was to bypass normal channels of communication by creating parallel study groups like PCEG and OSP, which simply fabricated evidence and “stovepiped” it directly to Cheney and Bush. Presiding over these new systems of intelligence manufacture and marketing and conveying the product to the administration was Lewis “Scooter” Libby. I would suspect that a reshuffling of the intelligence chain of command under Trump would serve a similar purpose of simply bypassing potential checks on whatever agenda the administration has in mind. My personal fear is that the Trump administration is going to be Bush II 2.0, the public opposition of Zakheim and other neocons notwithstanding.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      January 5, 2017

      Trump is Likud.

      Russia wants to keep their base in Syria. Turkey doesn’t want the Kurds to have a state. Israel wants to break up secular Arab states, and Saudi Arabia wants to destroy Iran.

      Netanyahu made a deal with Putin and Erdogan. Putin will keep his naval base in a rump Alawite Syria. Israel will get to break up the rest of the Shia crescent and play the Saudi Sunnis against them. Likud will expel the Palestinians to that area (and maybe Jordan eventually.) Turkey will keep the Kurds from getting a state and joining with Turkish Kurds in Eastern Turkey.

      The USA wants to isolate Russia and expand NATO. That is what Georgia and Ukraine were about. But Trump is now screwing USA to help Netanyahu. The entire point of the Iran deal was to pull Iran out of Russia’s orbit but Israel will not allow USA to do that – and now that Likud Trump is President, Netanyahu gets whatever they want.

      Just like LBJ took Cuba away from the USA military and instead gave them Vietnam, Trump is going to take Russia off the table and instead give the USA military China – that’s why he’s making amends with Philippines (who was going off the reservations) and talking to Taiwan.

      Trump’s a Democrat, so he sides with Wall Street finance against Main Street industrial business. How will Trump finesse this?

      Let the brainy Jews at Slate Star Codex explain:

      http://slatestarcodex.com/2017/01/03/trump-and-the-batman-effect/

      Will this ridiculous trick work on the Alt-Right? Of course it will, Andrew Anglin – the new leader of the Alt Right – will continue to cheer as Trump throws out meaningless soundbites with no substance. But since that is all the Alt Right cares about – meaningless “wins” in the media – it will totally work.

      Since Trump is essentially a Jewish Democrat, he’s appeasing the GOP by bringing in some pro-lifers and neo-con Goys in the military.

      The only weakness I see in this analysis is that I don’t see Trump giving much to the Navy, which you would expect he would do to take on China – let’s see if that happens next.

      The intel agencies will be purged of the pro-NATO, anti-Russian faction to appease Likud.

      Bush Sr. was an Arabist, which is why he was taken down via the fake recession of the media allowing Perot in the debates. When Clinton got uppity about the Israel Palestine negotiations, he got Esther Lewinsky.

      Bush Jr. saw what happened and made sure to bring in the Jewish neo-cons, only to get 9/11. Obama – CIA – was the pushback against Likud, with the Iran deal and the UN resolution – which Trump, remember, spend both Obama terms fighting.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        January 5, 2017

        The other reason Trump is filling up his administration with Wall Street Goldman Sachs types is for defense against the inevitable currency and trade war with China as they ramp up tensions.

        Be sure to read the Slate Star Codex “Trump as Batman” article – it’s spot on as far as I can tell.

        Also, here’s my bet. Trump will deport some criminal illegal aliens back to Mexico and Latin America. He may even put a temporary moratorium on Muslim immigration. He won’t do anything substantive to reverse White dispossession at all.

        Spencer and his new boss Anglin will fade back into obscurity as they grow more and more ridiculous, playing the part of (((Hollywood Nazi))) for the media. By the time Spencer finishes his college tour he will be thoroughly “David Duked.” If the “Alt Right” label survives at all, it will be Milo style anti-SJW kosher conservatism like at Breitbart.

        Both the progressive left and the Trumpian right will continue to troll each other and have zero meaningful impact on political reality – they won’t even understand what is going on. The GOP will continue doing what they do best – dog-whistling about race but never actually using the word “white.” Things will continue they way they have – the far right will be allowed to hate Muslims and bitch about Blacks, but will submit to the new multi-cultural upper class of Asians and Indians.

        White Identity politics will be limited to the lower class whites bitching about blacks and mestizos.

        Show me how I’m wrong.

        Liked by 2 people

      • bob saffron
        January 5, 2017

        I take extreme offense to the anti-white hate slur “goy.”☺

        Liked by 1 person

      • indravaruna
        January 5, 2017

        “Bush Sr. was an Arabist, which is why he was taken down via the fake recession of the media allowing Perot in the debates.”

        You going to like this Hipster:

        http://www.jewishpress.com/sections/features/features-on-jewish-world/george-bush-james-baker-and-the-jews/2014/10/31/

        Liked by 2 people

      • bob saffron
        January 5, 2017

        Anglin’s muscled into Spencer’s personal problem, but has Spencer tied his fortunes to the DS? I see no evidence of that.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        January 6, 2017

        Yes, Spencer did. He all but endorsed Anglin at a time when Anglin was claiming he tells Spencer what to do.

        Anglin is now the Leader of the Alt-Right, which means the label “Alt Right” is useless for anything outside of 14 year old boys internet trolling with frog memes.

        Spencer is fooling himself if he thinks he’s going to win a Congressional seat. He fucked himself royally.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        January 6, 2017
      • bob saffron
        January 6, 2017

        Spencer has shown the will to break alliances in the past when they don’t suit his personal agenda (eg. the Night of the Long Knives at the old Alternative Right/Nowicki/Liddel). I think he could sever any closeness with Anglin if he judges it prejudicial to his movement.

        Like

  7. Sam J.
    January 5, 2017

    “..Is Trump the new JFK, or is this a sinister Mossad plot?…”

    That’s really the meat of the issue. All the talk about Trumps past with Jews does look damning but he would have to deal with them being in NYC. One thing that encourages me is he’s talked for decades about the same problems before he ran. He hasn’t changed his story at all. I suspect that if he doesn’t go all out for our side he will be very dangerous for WN.

    If he has the balls he has them on 9-11. Building #7 is a complete physical impossibility without some kind of demo.

    I suggest he could go on live TV, show the tapes of building #7 and lay off the top 10% of every security force in the USA. Everyone. Get special forces to protect him along with the secret service. I don’t think all the intelligence agents are corrupt and they would rally around him. Invade the agencies and steal all their blackmail material to…persuade..congress and start investigating, convicting and hanging people.

    He would go down as one of the greatest Presidents in history.

    That being said you’re probably right in that he’s a Mossad plant and we’re all screwed.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      January 5, 2017

      “he would have to deal with them being in NYC.”

      I think we pretty thoroughly debunked that talking point way back during the primaries.

      “One thing that encourages me is he’s talked for decades about the same problems before he ran”

      Except that is not true. The only issue Trump has been somewhat consistent on is trade deals – and he apparently took up that issue in order to undercut the Reform party – it was Perot’s signature issue. But even that – a year or two before this campaign he was actually extolling the benefits of “breaking down economic borders” and the benefits of free trade. He has simply never been consistent – he just tells people whatever he thinks they want to hear – far more than even most politicians.

      Trump never breathed a word about illegal immigration until this campaign.

      Well, he has been consistent on one issue – his love and support for Israel and the Jewish people. He has never once gone soft on that.

      Liked by 1 person

    • bob saffron
      January 6, 2017

      No such thing as “live TV”. It’s lagged to allow for “technical problems”.

      Liked by 1 person

    • bob saffron
      January 6, 2017

      “lay off the top 10% of every security force in the USA. Everyone. Get special forces to protect him along with the secret service.”

      Like

  8. icareviews
    January 5, 2017

    Ordinarily I like James Petras’s articles, but I have to differ with his take on what’s happening here. He characterizes the Russian “hacking” allegations as part of a “coup” attempt and furthermore seems to suggest that Trump’s appointment of Zionist operatives constitutes a kind of tokenism. I can’t agree. The “Russian hacking” smear just seems like a last, desperate rearguard “fuck you” action on the part of the outgoing Obama/CIA contingent, designed to mire the incoming Trump administration in scandal from the outset.

    http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_75786.shtml

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      January 5, 2017

      I think it’s plausible that Russia was behind at least some of the “hacks,” and it’s likely that Russia wanted Trump (Netanyahu’s boy, which Putin made a deal with as I explained last year.)

      But “interfering” in other country’s elections happens in every country’s election – the US does it all the time and in far more overt ways then just “hacking.” At the end of the day it is just sour grapes. There was never any possibility that the Electoral college was going to vote for someone else. It’s just Democrats trying to taint Trump’s win.

      And of course the Democrats are calling Trump “Putin’s boy” instead of the reality – “Netanyahu’s boy” – for the obvious reasons.

      Trump (a liberal Democrat) had to shore up GOP support, and he did – with Pence and by most of his other picks.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. indravaruna
    January 5, 2017

    I have a mixed view of the CIA:

    – Nixon hated the CIA
    – The Bush Family is heavily connected to it
    – The former CIA agent Michael Scheuer that now writes a blog denouncing US foreign policy and Jewish influence is married to the “Torture Queen” Alfreda Frances Bikwosky (the Jessica Chastain character in the Zero-Dark-Thirty movie was based on her)
    – The former CIA chief Woolsey is one of th main Neocon goys
    – If 9/11 was a inside job there is no way that powerful elements inside the CIA didn’t knew it

    Liked by 1 person

    • indravaruna
      January 6, 2017

      Hey Hipster, your favorite CIA chief Woolsey just broke with Trump.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        January 6, 2017

        Like most shabbos goyim, Woolsey was tossed aside when he was no longer useful. He was always seen as a lightweight and one of the least competent DCIs ever. He was just a shameful toady.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        January 7, 2017

        @indravaruna

        What I mean is that the only reason Woolsey was sucking up to Trump is hoping he would get some major intel position, the fool probably thought he was in the running for DNI. He was against Trump, then was for him, then when he didn’t get a major position, he pretended he was “breaking” with Trump.

        I call bullshit. He sucked up to the Trump people when he thought he could get something, then when he didn’t, he ran to the press pretending he quit.

        Seriously, just read this guy’s long history – he’s a fool, a lightweight, a toady, and a shameless whore – he always has been.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      January 7, 2017

      The CIA isn’t monolithic and different factions take power at different times. I assume it’s somewhat lagged from the Presidents – one President puts in a new director and over the course of a few years he replaces the main CIA players. Then a new President shifts it yet again.

      There’s also a stark division between the analysis side, which are basically academics and quite political, versus the ops side, who do the actual wet work and have apparently quite often been involved in very self-serving criminality. AFAICT, various factions in the CIA have been major drug traffickers – heroin and cocaine – for a long, long time. Sometimes unofficially, sometimes seemingly quite officially.

      According to Susan Lindauer, her CIA handler Richard Fuisz – and Tenet, Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld – were all expecting a 9/11 type event and ordered her to threaten the Iraqis over it.

      CIA has been involved in torture quite independently from Israelis although the Israelis certainly left their mark on CIA torture tactics during the Bush II regime.

      The analysis side of CIA did put up quite a resistance to the Iraqi WMD propaganda, which is why they were saddled with the neo-con Office of Special Plans and why Valerie Plame was outed. It also appears it’s this same analysis side that is being attacked by Trump – but also the same faction of neo-cons that are ostensibly also pro-Likud. There’s more here than we can see clearly at this point. Who knows – it may just be simple GOP/Dem partisanship with nothing more complicated than that.

      Liked by 1 person

  10. guest
    January 7, 2017

    I’m sure this will be good for a post or two, it’s by the ex-CIA agent who interrogated Saddam Hussein:

    “Saddam had actually believed 9/11 would bring Iraq and America closer because Washington would need his secular government to help fight fundamentalism. How woefully wrong he had been.”

    In 2006, John Nixon was called to debrief George Bush. Nixon says that once he was done with his debriefing, the president joked by saying, “You sure Saddam didn’t say where he put those vials?” To which everyone around him laughed. However, Nixon says that he found the joke unkind; since America alone has lost more than 4000 ‘documented’ troops, let alone those of other nations and Iraq itself.

    “I decided I would not criticise the hardworking patriots of the CIA for the faulty intelligence on Iraq,” Bush stated unironically in his 2010 memoir, as Nixon observes.

    This would be funny if it wasn’t so sad, he forgives the CIA, LOL!

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      January 7, 2017

      Lindauer said that they had negotiated a great deal with Iraq over ending the sanctions. They would open up their oil to US companies, they had agreed to spend billions on US autos and other industrial products, and they were allowing FBI open access to root out Islamist terrorist groups (which Saddam hated, and who hated Saddam.)

      USA had Iraq by the balls, the Iraqis were desperate to do whatever USA wanted in return for lifting the sanctions.

      Iraq could have been another Jordan. But apparently, a strong, secular, pro-American Arab state that close to Israel was intolerable for the Israelis (and the Saudis too one would guess.)

      Jordan just warned about Likud Trump’s plan to move the American embassy to Jerusalem. Jordan is in charge of maintaining the status quo at the Jerusalem “holy” sites. Jordan is basically a US client state, a toady. The Jordanian king has actually appeared as a guest star on Star Trek and the Jordanian princess hangs out with Hollywood celebrities.

      But apparently Israeli interests take precedence over American interests – even more so under the new Trump administration.

      If I’m wrong, I’m wrong – someone explain to me how I’m wrong.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Sam J.
        January 8, 2017

        “…Iraq could have been another Jordan. But apparently, a strong, secular, pro-American Arab state that close to Israel was intolerable for the Israelis (and the Saudis too one would guess.)…”

        GodDamn these people. The opportunities they miss. I might add if after the cold war if we would have done everything in our power to make Russia a successful country instead of sending over a bunch of Jews to loot the place. Ever heard of the CoDominium society in SciFi?

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CoDominium

        We could have had huge success without the trappings of odious Empire we have today. The lost opportunities are immense. We’ll never get them back either. Especially if Trump continues the path the Jews wish to lead us on. NuttyYahoo said something like “after we suck them dry I don’t care if they blow away” concerning the US. I wonder do we not have enough decent people in this country to stop this? Is this our fate? They are surely sucking us dry.

        If I was made king for a day I would really fuck the Israeli’s and work a deal for Assad to be the king of the Kurds territory. Expand Syria.

        Like

    • bob saffron
      January 7, 2017

      Who can forget the guy’s wit?

      Like

  11. Hipster Racist
    January 7, 2017

    @icareviews:

    o/t, but consider your opinions on Pinochet vs. Allende and read this:

    http://therightstuff.biz/2017/01/06/a-current-year-listicle-the-they-had-it-coming-catalogue-2/

    As we all know, Chile experienced something akin to a miracle in the early 1970s with the rise of Augusto Pinochet – a man with a penchant for sunglasses and physically removing communists via helicopter rides, along with his elite death squad called the “Caravan of Death.” Shortly after the anti-communist coup on September 11th, 1973, Jara was arrested, tortured under interrogation and eventually got a bullet in the head. Afterwards, his body was thrown in the street of a shanty town in Santiago. Good riddance.

    What are we dealing with, really, with this Anglin/TRS/Spencer crowd?

    A few days ago some actual Marxist/Communists – non-SJW types, not really anti-White, openly pro-violent – went to TRS and actually had some somewhat serious exchanges with them over economics and class.

    They accused the neo-fascists of TRS of siding with the oligarchs against the White working class. The TRS side were defending historical fascists, especially Hitler. The Marxists/Communists didn’t bother to actually defend Marx or Lenin. They did complain a bit about “anti-semitism.”

    They both used Goodfellas youtube clips to troll each other over who was the most “hardcore” and pro-violence.

    Pervical is one of the smarter guys in that crowd – he’s a shithead liar, and a Catholic Nazi LARPer, but he isn’t stupid and every once in a while actually tells the truth. He was about the only one that could hold his own against the Communists.

    I find it interesting that the left is implicitly acknowledging that the neo-fascists are in fact appealing to what they consider “their people” – the white working class. The real neo-Commies – Jewish and non-Jewish – realize that any future they have relies on Whites and that Blacks and Mestizos are never going to bring them to the Glorious Future.

    Is the White Working class really in play again?

    As far as I’m concerned – Neo-Nazi vs. Neo-Commie is just another permutation of Post-Catholic vs. Post-Jew. That’s why a “WN” like Matt Heimbach chants “Death to America” along with the anti-liberals (i.e., anti-Americans) of NRx.

    As a Real American – i.e., a WASP – I reject both of them – just as both of them reject America, my country.

    I am really damn suspicious of people who want Americans to reject our own history and our own traditions and LARP as foreign historical societies. I’m all for Global Pro-Whiteness. I’m 100% pro-Europe, and pro-Afrikaaner.

    I’m perfectly willing to recognize the historical mistakes of America.

    But what sort of supposedly “pro-White” movement wants us to reject our own White American history and LARP as a (((Hollywood))) version of foreign history?

    How are the Neo-Fascists even all that different from the non-anti-White Neo-Communists?

    Liked by 1 person

    • bob saffron
      January 7, 2017

      Chile’s military occupied an incomparably more important part of society that is the case in the US. Only the Church rivaled it. This made a coup possible (tacit approval from Washington, of course, after various Communist expropriations, eg. Anaconda Copper). Nothing like those conditions exist in any Western nation that I can think of.

      Pinochet’s methods were the standard South American ones, distasteful. Off the top of my head, desaparecidos in Chile numbered about 3,000. In tiny Uruguay the number was about 10,000. Forget about Brazil, etc. – vastly higher. The Workers’ Paradise of Cuba? Send Michael Moore to make a Castro hagiography.

      No, Pinochet is demonized only because he eliminated Allende, the only democratically-elected Marxist.

      Like

    • bob saffron
      January 7, 2017

      Pinochet was, if anything, a traditionalist. I see him as a Franco. Strong army, strong Church, a law-and-order ticket. If you were a left-wing agitator you caught the next plane to Paris (or else!) and made anti-Pinochet movies or ran Pablo Neruda worship-groups for the next forty years.

      Without the Church and the middle class on side, the army (though very powerful) could never have pulled it off.

      The US is not even vaguely similar, Chileans are substantially one ethnic group, Mestizo, with the usual South American continuum – the higher in society, the whiter the faces. Theirs was an ideological conflict, not a racial one.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        January 7, 2017

        Franco – the guy who imported Black African troops and let them roam free to mass rape Spanish women?

        Man, you “right wingers” sure can pick ’em, eh?

        Ideology over race, every time. Profits over race, every time. Religion over race, every time.

        How are you any different than the conservatards who say “Hitler was a leftist because he was a ‘socialist’?

        Like

      • bob saffron
        January 7, 2017

        This is an excessively cartoonish view of history. Granted, Franco was no saint, but do you seriously believe that the (((Republicans))) would have given a tinker’s cuss about the fate of Spanish women? How did the Russian women do under the Bolsheviks?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        January 7, 2017

        Is it or is it not a fact that Franco imported Black Africans who then mass raped Spanish women?

        What is “simplistic” is saying “Franco good, Republicans bad.”

        What is “simplistic” is saying “Fascists good.”

        Like

      • bob saffron
        January 8, 2017

        You twist everything. I implied Franco “better”, (((Republicans))) “worse”. The latter essentially just proxies for the Bolsheviks.

        Like

    • Sam J.
      January 8, 2017

      “…I’m all for Global Pro-Whiteness. I’m 100% pro-Europe, and pro-Afrikaaner…”

      ME TOO. On our faults I think Whitaker said it best,”The White race has never committed a unique sin. Anti-Whites say “White people did this or that and therefore must disappear from the Earth”…”

      I really appreciate you posting his tweets in one place. They are so good.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        January 8, 2017

        @Sam J

        Wasn’t it you that sent me those tweets? Someone did, I just formatted them and posted them, and their request. It’s great stuff, Bob Whitaker has the most effective pro-white talking points of anyone. No one even comes close.

        He knows how marketing works, which is why the left gets so damn touchy about BUGs style rhetoric. I was banned from reddit /r/politics because I used his techniques so effectively.

        The anti-whites LOVE it when your LARP as a “Nazi” or otherwise play the clown. They LOVE it when you tailgate them and say “liberals are the real racists.”

        What they cannot stand, what they cannot refute, is pointing out all the many ways they are simply anti-white.

        My favorite Whitaker tactic is when, at first, an anti-white denies they want White genocide. When you then point out they do, in fact, want white people gone, they then start justifying why it’s good for white people to die off, disappear, or breed out.l

        Then you just say, “so now you have gone from denying white genocide to justifying white genocide.”

        They have no response to that.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        January 10, 2017

        I would love to claim credit but I didn’t send them. I’m very fond of Bob. Seeing them all together magnifies their power. I saved a copy. I believe if every pro-White read the whole list every week and just spewed them out every time they talked to the anti-Whites life would become very difficult for the anti-Whites indeed. Bob is a genius and I don’t think presently there’s anyone to replace him.

        Like

  12. bob saffron
    January 7, 2017

    One final point, Pinochet’s legacy can’t be judged without considering the antecendents of the coup. Rampant inflation, economic depression, lawlessness and “proletariat” expropriations of property (unpunished or gloated over by the Allende admin.) BLM ain’t nothing in comparison.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      January 7, 2017

      I won’t pretend to know enough about Allende and Pinochet to have much of an argument. I asked icareviews because he wrote an article and did an interview about the topic that was surprisingly critical of Pinochet and friendly toward Allende.

      Chile’s “economic miracle” under Pinochet appears to be little more than selling out their natural resource to (((Western))) investors. “Rampant inflation” – i.e., taking the side of the debtors – the average Chilean – against the tiny minority of creditors and (((International Bankers.)))

      A situation only a Libertardian could support.

      Chile is NINETY PERCENT “White and Non-Indigenous.” So that means the vast majority of those “communists” and debtors were WHITES.

      No guesses who the (((creditors))) and (((Wall Street Bankers))) who were upset over all that “inflation” eh?

      Hasn’t (((Pete Singer))) done the same thing to other white South American nations recently – leveraged US power and (((International Bankers))) in order to interfere with local politics to prevent “inflation” that might have a negative impact on (((certain people’s))) profits?

      Funny how “leftist” and even “communist” governments were always just FINE unless they start “currency manipulation” – i.e., interfering with the profits of the (((Wall Street Bankers.)))

      Like

      • bob saffron
        January 7, 2017

        You are wrong on Chile and the Chileans. They are not a majority white country, it’s a majority Mestizo one, with a substantial pure European minority (especially south of Santiago). The upper echelons of society tend to be more European in appearance. (The same is evident in Peru, but with much more Indian blood generally and a much smaller European upper class). Your “90% white” sounds like it’s from the CIA fact-sheet.

        And of course, the (((bankers))) and US commercial interests (eg. Anaconda Copper, Kennecott Copper, etc.) were hostile to a Communist expropriation. Haven’t you ever been a shareholder of any enterprise?

        What you apparently don’t get is that it wasn’t the Communist antipathy to (((bankers))) that united the middle class against Allende, but their antipathy to any “property” holders. Your holiday house risked seizure, as did your small business and farm.

        What, you think it would be better to live in North Korea than under Wall St.’s hegemony, Jews and all?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        January 7, 2017

        Ideology over race, economics over race, capitalism over race, eh?

        It is the capitalists (and (((capitalists)))) that are promoting mass race replacing immigration in white countries – and only white countries.

        But apparently that’s ok for anti-white “libertarians” because the interest rate is more important than blood.

        So the choice is, “would you rather live under a totalitarian dictatorship ruled by people of your own race, or a totalitarian dictatorship ruled by Jews?”

        Race > Economics.

        And it’s a false choice anyway, since Fascists are not liberals. The neo-Fascists are clear that they don’t believe in freedom for White people, they don’t believe in freedom of speech, they don’t believe in freedom of religion (we all have to be faux-Catholics, sedevacantists, apparently. Perhaps Anglin will be the new Pope?)

        And the choice you are offering us is slavery to Wall Street anyway, so what sort of choice is that?

        Allende received a plurality with 36.2% of the vote. Christian Democrat Radomiro Tomic won 27.8% with a very similar platform to Allende’s. Both Allende and Tomic promised to further nationalize the mineral industry and redistribute land and income among other new policies. Conservative former president Jorge Alessandri, standing for the National Party, received slightly under 34.9% of the vote.

        https://infogalactic.com/info/Presidency_of_Salvador_Allende#Allende_becomes_president

        So two thirds of the population wanted to get out from under the heel of foreign investors and their domestic enforcers … Wall Street – sorry, (((Wall Street))) didn’t like that, so the CIA staged an early form of “Color Revolution” – using a proto-George Soros type, no doubt.

        I think it’s you that is giving us a simplistic version of history.

        Donald Trump is at least pretending to be anti-free trade and wants to institute a tariff – that is likely to cause price inflation. He wants to cut taxes but can’t cut any spending – more inflation.

        So you are cool if George Soros staged a “Color Revolution” against Trump for his populist policies?

        Either way – let’s be honest here. The Anglin/TRS/Spencer crowd doesn’t know jack shit about economics – nor has a clue about Trump’s actual policies – they just like to LARP about giving “helicopter rides” to “Marxists.”

        I think I know who is promoting a very “simplistic” version of history – and it ain’t me.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        January 8, 2017

        “would you rather live under a totalitarian dictatorship ruled by people of your own race, or a totalitarian dictatorship ruled by Jews?”

        Here you go again with your distortion of the interlocutor’s argument. The US is hardly a totalitarian dictatorship ruled by Jews. That’s ridiculous on the face of it. We’re commenting on an “anti-Semitic” site. It’s a mixed economy with citizens still enjoying certain freedoms of action and expression. North Korea is a totalitarian hell-hole, Jews or not.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        January 8, 2017

        Sorry, the largest debtors in the world are always the governments, not the punters.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        January 10, 2017

        bob saffron,”…The US is hardly a totalitarian dictatorship ruled by Jews…”

        I believe this point is debatable. Another few decades of their rule and they will be the dictators. I tell you what try to shake them off from the banking system, the book publishing system and the media and then tell me whether they are dictators or not.

        Like

  13. bob saffron
    January 7, 2017

    Regarding Singer, again you’re being too simplistic. These nations’ governments borrowed recklessly without anyone’s help. The idea that their rulers borrowed for the people’s good is naive in the extreme.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      January 7, 2017

      Obama borrowed money in my name, therefore I have to pay it back?

      Are you pro-White or are you pro-Usury?

      Like

      • bob saffron
        January 8, 2017

        Both, unless you can tell me what’s wrong with loaning money on interest and where that stops and “usury” begins. Perhaps you’d like to lend me some interest-free (ethnic solidariety loan)?

        Like

      • bob saffron
        January 8, 2017

        The adiministration borrowed it, and taxpayers will be shouldered with that debt. You could always go through the lengthy process of de-citizenship if you wish to avoid your share of what’s coming.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        January 8, 2017

        The Singer m.o. is explained here. So, the Jews taught the Kirchners a lesson in financial probity. Big deal.
        https://mises.org/library/understanding-argentina%E2%80%99s-coming-default

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        January 8, 2017

        We’re discussing Chile under Pinochet – that was a dictatorship.

        We’re also discussing usury under a fiat system – an international fiat system controlled by central banks that are institutionally pro-creditor and anti-debtor – EXCEPT in cases where the wealthy classes go into debt – then, we get quantitative easing and bailouts to help the wealthy.

        Your libertarian system simply doesn’t exist – it’s an abstraction that amounts to nothing more than blowing smoke in order to disguise what amounts to the majority having their property confiscated in order to subsidize various power groups – and (((groups.)))

        Your system is nothing more than a welfare state for the “rich” – and they are “rich” by nothing more than financial fraud, essentially.

        You never answered the question from last week – give me a specific number of dollars that should exist, in total?

        If you cannot answer that question, then all your economic arguments are moot.

        If you want to move to a hard gold standard, fine. Then explain how either the quantity of gold – or the velocity of exchange – will increase to meet the extra supply needed to pay off the usury?

        You promote what amounts to a Communist redistribution from the population at large to the owners of the state. You use “libertarian” and “capitalist” language merely to disguise what you are really advocating – mass theft from the population to the ruling class (mostly, the (((ruling class.))))

        Like

      • Sam J.
        January 8, 2017

        The Jews bribed the legislature to have sole control of the money supply creating “debt” whenever money is created and I mean every single dime of money created in the US is debt based. A moments slight thought would tell you that if all money is created by debt then the debt can never be paid off. If we got rid of the debt we would have no money. I know this sounds stupid and it would seem that this isn’t true but…it is. I’m not for that. I don’t see myself as bound by bribed crooked legislatures or the Jews “debt” schemes. We’re often told the Jews are so rich because they’re so smart. Lies. They create the money from nothing. If you look at the banking crisis these people are so stupid that they go broke even if they get money for free to lend out. All they have to keep up with is the interest and they couldn’t even do that they were so incompetent.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        January 8, 2017

        @Sam J

        A moments slight thought would tell you that if all money is created by debt then the debt can never be paid off. If we got rid of the debt we would have no money.

        During the Clinton administration the Wall Street Journal started freaking out because there were serious calls to actually retire the public debt. The CATO Institute types were forced to explain to the idiots that if we actually retired the national debt, there would be no money.

        FFS, I worked in fixed income and wrote bond trading software. This is like Econ 102 level stuff. Anyone who spent a semester learning about monetary systems knows this.

        We can have commodity money. Gold was, in a way, a workable system. Gold still plays an important part in international settlements. There is truth to the libertarian arguments about savings. But mainstream economics have pretty much already internalized the important aspects of Austrian economics, which is why Austrianism has devolved into a cult of “praxeology” – a ridiculous religious conception of human action. No – humans are not at all rational consumers.

        Libertarians just cannot get it through their head that there is a difference between a free market for shoes – something free markets and competition are really, really good at – vs. something like privatized water – which a free market is terrible at. Society comes before economics, and society is more than just economic activity.

        Many of the monetary problems we are dealing with have to do the Triffin Dilemma anyway. Once the US dollar stops being the world’s reserve currency – say goodbye to what’s left of the middle class. We should be preparing for the inevitable end of the petrodollar, not distracting ourselves with bullshit about “the day the EBT stops working.”

        Republicans and conservatives are too busy hating poor black people and actually think that we pay taxes to support single black mothers on welfare when the reality is we’re paying income taxes to support Wall Street. Get rid of the Wall Street parasite, and dealing with the poor blacks would be easy (simple segregation and free birth control would work in one generation.)

        There are all sorts of monetary and financial reforms we can make that would help our situation a great deal, but no one ever proposes them because they are stuck in a 19th century moralistic framework. Hell I’m a Presbyterian but even I can admit Calvin was just wrong about usury – the Catholics actually had a lot of this right. Some form of distributionism is the best balance between capitalism and socialism. “Usury” never meant JUST “compound interests” – it had a much broader meaning.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        January 10, 2017

        Strange how I just read an article about this. Well not strange because it’s just the same old shit over and over where the financiers steal everyone blind all the while playing on our decency to “pay our debts”. Money and wealth are NOT the same thing. Money is an accounting system that can be big stones, gold, virgins or tobacco. Wealth is resources that you will trade money for. Iron, farm land. In the depression you had all this land and products worth a fortune one day and the next…nothing.

        I’ve never heard it said before but I think part of the American Revolution was because Britain fucked our money supply. In Pennsylvania they had a very good prosperous money system based on land. Paper bills directly related to land. Benjamin Franklin told them about our wonderful system and they promptly banned it and the whole place went into a depressionary spiral.

        I think a good money system could be based on Kilowatts. Energy. We could base it on the price of Big Macs which I’ve heard is one the best price indicators in the market. A basket of goods would probably be best. As long as the money supply is stable and based on some reasoned quantity of value that everyone can see and you don’t print like mad it could be anything. It must be something that can be crated through productivity though. Gold is absurd. Money supply has to grow with production or you get deflation and depressions.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        January 10, 2017

        HR,”… I worked in fixed income and wrote bond trading software…”

        You got to look at this. It’s the future. Long story. The guy who wrote a lot of the real time operating system of the Amiga computer system wrote THE programming language. Called it Rebol and it’s scripted. He did this about the time open source became all the rage and he charged a stiff rate for it. Didn’t take off. It’s probably the most forward looking programming software language ever. Ok so after it languished for a while with a few fanatical users he open sourced it (called R3). At the same time another very talented user of Rebol decided to write it himself and make the whole thing BSD licensed PLUS it will be a compiled system language like C and C++. It’s called (Red Programming Language(RPL) or (RED)). It’s not done yet but it’s fairly far along. Now your thinking blah, blah another wacky language. NO. It’s very deep. It is like a sort of human language. Words can mean different things in context. Minimal brackets and stuff. It is sort of like LISP and sort of like forth and sort of like a lot of other languages. The key is it’s small size because of it’s productivity. The whole interpreter with a built in GUI is less than a megabyte. It also has Domain Specific Languages(DSL) support built in. So you can build your own DSL. Like HTML or Postscript or FLASH or in the case of Rebol the Video GUI is actually a DSL called VID. Also includes vector graphics, in less than a MB.

        Remember we’re talking about three versions, Rebol, RED(RPL) and R3(Reobol 3), that are all mostly the same. Rebol and R3 are used in production systems now. RED…not sure, probably not yet.

        Warning the original Rebol interpreter has a cheesy interface as it’s old. RPL uses the OS’s graphics low level libraries for the backend of it’s GUI. Like Win libraries for windows and GTK for Linux, etc…Mostly lines and boxes, stuff like that. The actual windows and GUI is mostly written in RED. Here’s a quick tutorial written with Rebol.

        http://re-bol.com/starting_computer_programming_with_rebol.html

        There’s lots more. Here’s a forum. Look at the link “Sticky: USEFUL REBOL DOCUMENTS AND RESOURCES” at the top. Lots of links with explanations.

        http://www.rebolforum.com/index.cgi?f=home

        Here’s RPL page. It’s not done yet but it can compile a lot of stuff now. He wrote the compiler and the linker in Rebol. The compiler and the low level system language are actually DSL’s of the Rebol language.

        http://www.red-lang.org/

        R3 links are on the RESOURCES page I linked earlier. It’s a bit of chicken and egg right now but if you use Rebol, the first interpreter, then the programming is mostly the same for all of them. I believe that RED or RPL is going to be huge. Think of how many lines of code are used to make a stupid window and see what is done with Rebol and RED. It’s no comparison. Think of the 100MB downloads of JAVAshit to spend days typing useless objects for retards and then look at some of the complicated stuff people are doing on a page or two of code.If you code for a living this could make you some money. You could produce at ten times the rate of others.

        One problem with these. They are very deep and if you think of them like C or JAVA where you spell everything out you will miss out. Even though it seems to be a toy it’s not. It’s very much like a human language where a few different words can be strung together for vastly different ends. Carl Sassenrath who wrote this is a major genius for thinking this up and the guy making RED is improving it and adding modern features. Some big ideas below.

        http://www.rebol.com/article/0188.html

        http://www.rebol.com/article/0103.html

        http://blog.hostilefork.com/arity-of-rebol-red-functions/

        http://blog.hostilefork.com/why-rebol-red-parse-cool/

        http://www.drdobbs.com/embedded-systems/the-rebol-scripting-language/184404172

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        January 10, 2017

        @Sam J

        LOL – I remember you posting about that on MWIR like seven years ago … didn’t realize you had been with us for so long …

        Like

      • Sam J.
        January 10, 2017

        I tell anyone that post about programming about Red and Rebol. RED is moving fast. I’m not a programmer per say. I had a couple classes in assembly language and one on Fortran. I read a lot and you can tell that Rebol is special. Normal systems languages like C are used now but they’re so hard to use that I think it is dragging the whole industry down. I’m not smart enough to look at say, 10,000 lines of C (and let’s not even discuss C++) code and tell what’s going on.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        January 10, 2017

        I went back and found the post. It was almost 3 years ago. I had forgotten I posted it.

        http://mindweaponsinragnarok.com/2014/01/27/letter-from-matt-hale-public-demonstrations-only-way-forward-my-disagreement/#comment-41372

        Like

    • Hipster Racist
      January 8, 2017

      @bob saffron

      No, it’s you that is being too simplistic. These investors lent money recklessly without anyone’s help. If they lose their investments to default or inflation – well, that is the RISK they take. Whatever happened to a FREE MARKET?

      Do you not see how you offer nothing but subsidy for creditors? You ONLY warn of inflation, but never deflation.

      And apparently, if an investor lends recklessly – we’re supposed to invade other countries or overthrow governments in order to bail out investors who made bad investments.

      That is NOT A free market – that’s pure Communism for Creditors – which is all libertarianism is.

      Like

      • Sam J.
        January 11, 2017

        Let’s put some real no shit numbers on the subsidizing of the Oligarchs. Presently the Oligarchs own the government and make laws that funnel money to their pockets. I would bet my life the banks own damn near everything by now. If they don’t own everything then they are the most incompetent fools in history with all the cash we shoved their way. They got, we know from Rep. Ron Paul’s forced audit of the FED $16 trillion. Estimates of the total amounts a few years ago from looking at financial data is $29 trillion. I bet it’s more. At $29 Trillion and 300 million Americans we could have given a zero interest loan for every family of four of $386,666. Housing crisis solved and the economy would have roared with all that cash going into people’s pockets. Instead the banks got all the money to buy hard assets and we got the bill. We would be much better off printing money straight up and just giving it to people. There will be gasp at this idea but if printing 29 Trillion and giving it to the banks is not bad then why would bankrupting the banks and giving 29 trillion to the public be worse?

        Like

  14. Hipster Racist
    January 7, 2017

    It seems more and more obvious to me that this new “movement” of faux-Fascist LARPing is simply being set up as a controlled opposition to the SJWs. They are no different than the fake Marxist/socialist/communists groups – no different than the “anti-fa.”

    Heavy on LARPing – short on substance. Whatever the Anti-Fa/SJWs are, this new pretend “Fascist” movement is just the mirror image. Just like the “anti-Fa” pretend to be inspired by the old Communist movements (even though they haven’t a clue what actually happened – the USSR fell before these people were even born) – the new “Fa” pretends to be inspired by every two-bit Wall Street/capitalist/CIA controlled “Fascist” movement of the last century – even though none of these people were even born or have any memory of any of them.

    Just like the “Antifa” have all these fantasies of “taking it to muh streets” – we have well known trolls like LBF spamming every single message board with calls to “street violence.”

    But let’s be honest, none of these people have ever given anyone a beating – except for themselves when they jerk off to Japanese cartoon kiddie porn.

    I guess Black Lives Matter and the SJWs were getting too ridiculous and absurd (not to mention they were turning against the Zionists) – so along comes – surprise surprise – the mirror image, a direct opposite – that “just happens” to support the most Zionist president ever and “just happens” to be as absurd, ridiculous, and LARPy as the SJWs.

    You know, one of the main reasons that Capitalists support mass race-replacing immigration is because a ethnically homogeneous nation tends to form a welfare state. Welfare states – capitalist or socialist – can’t exist in a multi-racial state because of the natural differences between the races. This fact is well acknowledged by serious people on the right and the left.

    The left certainly understands this – see “Empire,” the “Communist Manifesto of the 21st Century,” and Noam Chomsky, both have acknowledged that international capitalism is against “racism” because it interferes with profits. The left doesn’t care, because they are more anti-white than they are pro-working class.

    Just like the conservatives and the libertarians don’t care, because they are pro-usury and anti-white.

    Of course actual National Socialism is off the table, because they are more interested in Hitler fetishism and LARPing and posturing as tough guys online than any actual economic and social policies. Always pair up something normal and natural and popular – National Socialism, hell, even just a decent White Welfare State – with absurd fetishism, thus discrediting the substantive ideas.

    This is Disruption 101 – old fashioned psy-ops.

    I’ve been pointing out the significance of Joshua Goldberg and Rita Katz’ SITE Intelligence for two years now, but no one heeded my warnings.

    “You’ve been fucked by Psy-ops – because physical wounds heal.”

    Like

  15. bob saffron
    January 8, 2017

    “Capitalists support mass race-replacing immigration is because a ethnically homogeneous nation tends to form a welfare state. Welfare states – capitalist or socialist – can’t exist in a multi-racial state because of the natural differences between the races.”

    That doesn’t make sense on any level. The welfare state raises labour costs and taxation (corporate as well). Immigration is supported (generally) by corporate because it lowers labour costs, and because social costs are externalized.

    Take Scandinavia’s welfare states, did they disappear with immigration? Of course not. If anything, immigration has hugely assisted the welfare state (the greater the poverty, the more the “clients”).

    The only free cheese in life on the mouse-trap.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      January 8, 2017

      If it doesn’t make any sense, then explain why virtually every single Fortune 500 company in the USA is officially “anti-racist,” pro-“diversity” and supports mass immigration?

      Explain why every major capitalist in the USA supported cheap immigrant labor – from the African slaves, to the Irish, to the Chinese in California, to now the Mestizos in California.

      Explain why, until cultural Marxism, the labor movement was always racially segregated and opposed mass immigration. It’s pretty simple supply and demand – more labor, lower wages. Less labor, higher wages.

      Take Scandinavia’s welfare states, did they disappear with immigration? Of course not. If anything, immigration has hugely assisted the welfare state (the greater the poverty, the more the “clients”).

      Are you kidding? It is precisely the mass Muslim immigration that is breaking their welfare states. It’s well know by even mainstream academics that racial diversity decreases people’s willingness to contribute to the commons, thus a welfare state. See Amy Chua, et al.

      You refuse to acknowledge economic reality because you keep pretending that we are under a gold standard, or even a hard money standard. Yet you know we are not.

      Are you a Chicago style monetarist, like Greenspan used to be?

      If so – what’s the “natural” interest rate? What should the fixed quantity of money be?

      You keep avoiding those questions because they undermine your pretense that there is a such thing as a “free market.”

      Next, tell us about mineral rights. How do mineral rights fit into your abstract libertarianism? Finder’s keepers?

      Libertarianism is no different than a fundamentalist religion, but with numbers. It’s not particularly different than numerology, in fact.

      Like

    • Sam J.
      January 8, 2017

      “…That doesn’t make sense on any level…”

      It makes perfect sense and the MILO freaks fit right in with what you’ve said. The Jews whenever they seen a new horse riding up to the pack always jump on it and try to steer it which way they want it to go. This is frequently successful because most all people are broke and can’t flit about the country on crusades while the Jew funded freaks can.

      Like

  16. guest
    January 8, 2017

    Speaking of SITE Intelligence Group, they mention it on the No Agenda podcast often, and how they are the source of those isis videos, stuff like:

    “Rita Katz did it again: she grabbed another ”ISIS” video and, before ISIS’ managed to distribute it themselves she beat them to the punch and sold it to ”Fix News.” Other networks went for the most bang for no buck deal: not paying to buy it yet citing and describing it as yet another proof that the ”War on Terror” must go on. ”

    The international war on terror, all based on rock solid kosher evidence!

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      January 8, 2017

      SITE was publicizing Joshua Goldberg’s various personalities, as both a “radical ISIS sympathizer” and a “White Supremacist” writing for (((Daily Stormer.)))

      Goldberg was originally partially outed on reddit. A few people infiltrated the mod chats and discovered this very tight knit group was running various subs, often posing as “liberals” and “conservatives.”

      The reddit people realized it was basically hasbara – it was a semi-professional group that behind the scenes were obviously pro-Israel, but often posed as anti-Israel in the most ridiculous way.

      When the FBI busted Joshua Goldberg, they discovered two or so dozen handles of his on reddit, so people were able to trace it back. Goldberg was also “hacking” into Israeli publication then those publications were blaming it on “White Supremacists.”

      The (((Daily Stormer))) pretends they didn’t know Joshua Goldberg was a Jew, but it hardly matters, as (((Daily Stormer))) is indistinguishable from Jew propaganda anyway.

      For instance, notice which group publications like The Atlantic use to represent the “Alt Right” in pictures:

      https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2016/12/genetics-race-ancestry-tests/510962/

      Considering they have been doing this for 50 years the only people who can actually be fooled by this are the very young – like teenagers. So when it comes to people who are adults, you can be pretty damn sure you are dealing with either very, very stupid people, or more likely, professional hasbara and semi-pros.

      Like

  17. guest
    January 8, 2017

    Here’s another good one from yesterday, Jan 7:
    Israeli diplomat caught on camera plotting to ‘take down’ UK MPs

    “An Israeli embassy official has been caught on camera in an undercover sting plotting to “take down” MPs regarded as hostile, including foreign office minister Sir Alan Duncan, an outspoken supporter of a Palestinian state.

    In an extraordinary breach of diplomatic protocol, Shai Masot, who describes himself as an officer in the Israel Defence Forces and is serving as a senior political officer at the London embassy, was recorded by an ­undercover reporter from al-Jazeera’s investigative unit speaking about a number of British MPs.”

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Hipster Racist
    January 8, 2017

    http://blog.jim.com/war/hard-core-and-softcore-trump-appointments/#comment-1475396

    Cavalier:

    This is it, folks. This is the WASP counterinsurgency. May the small rootless international Brahmin class die screaming.

    http://blog.jim.com/war/hard-core-and-softcore-trump-appointments/#comment-1475554

    AltKike is a Tool:

    1/ All of Trump’s foreign policy picks are extremist zionist interventionists veterans of lost wars albeit open to compromise with Russia on behalf of Israel

    2. His son in law’s father ran a gay blackmail scheme against the governor of NJ featuring an Israeli Mossad asset (NY Times)

    3. He shared a girlfriend,child pimp Maxwell, with pedophile island mossad asset Epstien.

    4. He is a protege of gay israeli asset roy cohn.

    5. Giuliani and Gingrich are very closely linked to Netanyahu funder Sheldon Adelson.

    6. His business interests include ties to Israeli organized crime prostitution rings.

    7. His casino vice operations were almost bankrupt until he was bailed out by important rothschild financial interests to whom he owes an eternal debt.

    8. All of his grandchildren are Jews.

    9. His wife is most likely a former escort involved in jewish ‘modeling’ networks.

    It’s easy to verify all of the above in business and MSM publications.

    Trump is not an opponent of Zog or a defender of the white race; he is an asset of a hostile transnational elite, a sex maniac blackmailed by mossad, a compromised errand boy . He is cursed and doomed to end in shame and scandal which is actually his purpose and meaning: to discredit European self determination .

    Like

    • Sam J.
      February 8, 2017

      “…9. His wife is most likely a former escort involved in jewish ‘modeling’ networks…”

      The first law suit against someone who clained this has been won by his wife.

      I’m not denying anything you say in this post but it’s looking better and better for Whites. It may be that Trump doesn’t hate Jews but he really hates some. The type of Jew only Jews. That hate Whites and wish to harm them.

      Like

  19. Hipster Racist
    January 8, 2017

    Ever since the election, the Alt-Right (Alt-White, Alt-West, Alt-Lite) and pretty much anyone pro-Trump in general, has been engaging in all sorts of wild conspiracy theories about how “the establishment” was going to somehow reverse the results of the elections. The various “protests” and riots were said to be financed by George Soros, and E. Michael Jones suggested they were going to shoot some protestors “on their own side” as a prelude for a coup.

    Then there was panic at the idea of the Electoral College voting against Trump, or “the establishment” otherwise using some sort of procedural tactics to block the inauguration. Sure – the Democrats wrote some elaborate fantasies about this, but the only people who took them seriously were conservatives (conservatives are the only people that ever take liberals seriously.)

    http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/11/the_democrats_real_strategy_in_launching_recounts.html

    Then there are constant fantasies about an assassination attempt.

    What all these conspiracy theories have in common is the idea that Trump is somehow “anti-establishment” or a great threat to the “establishment.” And it’s true in the sense that Trump is outside of the Washington DC political establishment. But Trump has spent his entire career being a toady for various parts of the establishment.

    One only needs to look at who Trump is putting into his administration to see that he will rule as a reliably left-of-center liberal Republican, a Rockefeller Republican of old, which makes sense as Trump has always basically been a liberal-to-moderate Democrat.

    I’m not trying to black pill anyone – Trump’s win has some good aspects for pro-Whites – the fact that the Democrats were utterly defeated is good. The fact that Trump mouths off against political correctness is good. The fact that Trump sometimes poses as a semi-civic nationalist is good – great, even.

    But let’s not pretend that Trump represents anything more than a re-entrenchment of the establishment. Just like Ronald Reagan, the system needs to solidify the progressive leftist gains of the last few decades.

    An easy example – the Obama administration pushed the LGBT agenda extremely far – “gay marriage” transgenders, etc. Now Trump will stop any more movement on that issue to allow time to solidify those “gains.” By the end of Trump’s administration no one will really think about “gay marriage” anymore, it will become completely normalized. But if Hillary had gotten into office and pushed something crazier, it could have started a backlash.

    Same with Reagan amnestying the illegal aliens – only a conservative could do that. He promised to close the borders and giving amnesty to those already here was supposed to be the end of it. But of course that’s never how it happens.

    I hope that people now start actually putting pressure on the Trump admin and start criticizing him – not “from the right” – “from the white.”

    If instead they react to every one of Trump’s awful appointments with knee-jerk defenses and excuses, what’s the point?

    Like

  20. Sam J.
    January 11, 2017

    If Trump is a Jew pawn then it’s a complicated situation. They are out for his blood. The media, the intelligence agencies and the whole bloody lot are melting down. Not I know about attacking so as to not seem to be guided but I don’t think this is the case. They are way over board. I think we need to think at least some kind of glitch in the straight Jew control scheme. Maybe the NuttyYahoo branch is having a fight with the Liberal Jew branch. If so then it would be good to separate them as much as possible…which Trump is doing.

    I think it’s still a possibility that Trump will throw Bush Jr. under the bus and blame 9-11 on him and the Saudi’s. Conveniently leaving out the Jews. It would be tricky to do so but the Jews are a tribe of psychopaths so I can see them doing something like this and just brazening it out.

    https://theintercept.com/2017/01/11/the-deep-state-goes-to-war-with-president-elect-using-unverified-claims-as-dems-cheer/

    I have no idea if the above is fake news but it does seem to fit the media narrative.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      January 11, 2017

      @Sam J

      There is most certainly a growing rift between the Zionists and the Diaspora Jews. For decades, they had the old time liberal mutli-cultural Jews that would nevertheless promote Zionism, ethno-nationalism for Jews in Israel. Those men are all retired and dying now.

      Their Jew and half-Jew kids either marry a White (or an Asian) and are barely Jews at all anymore – many of them, and almost certainly their grandkids, would even pass Hitler’s test (which was something like 25% Jew was acceptably German.)

      No one can accuse me of being insufficiently anti-semitic – I believe the old saw, an “anti-semite” is someone who hates Jews more than is absolutely necessary. But one reason I’m so fanatically anti-(((Hollywood Nazi))) is because those people misunderstand the nature of the Jewish enemy and are, in fact, just mirror images of Jews themselves.

      2017 is simply not 1977, much less 1948, even less 1933 – and sorry, NRx neo-Catholics, very much not 1577. “Jews” are not even the primary enemy anymore. Zionists are an enemy, but not our worst enemy. American Jews are still the intellectual and financial core of the anti-white movement, but they are less and less anti-white because of their Judaism and becoming more anti-white because of their globalism.

      The CIA factions aligned against Trump are not “the Jews.” It’s simply more complicated than that. The Jews that hate Trump are at the most are barely Zionist, and most hard core Zionists don’t really hate Trump at all.

      The Forward did an interview recently with a Khahanist Zionist – the most hard core of the hard core – who expressed his admiration for Richard Spencer and said that the Jews in Montana being harassed by “neo-Nazis” deserved it, because they were “liberals” attacking White people for simply standing up for their own people. “Zionism for White people” as it were.

      I still say the Zionist entity in Palestine is an enemy of the USA and all European people. But they aren’t enemies because of ideology now, more enemies because of historical circumstances.

      If all the Jews made aliyah tomorrow and AIPAC was registered as an agent of a foreign state, I dare say I wouldn’t even particularly consider them enemies anymore.

      Like

  21. Sam J.
    February 8, 2017

    “…American Jews are still the intellectual and financial core of the anti-white movement, but they are less and less anti-white because of their Judaism and becoming more anti-white because of their globalism…”

    I can buy that but…I’m not so sure you’re not jumping the gun by about 100 years. Maybe they’re working that way and many Jews are as you describe but I believe they are a tribe of psychopaths and that they will always be, due to psychopathy, our enemies.

    “…If all the Jews made aliyah tomorrow and AIPAC was registered as an agent of a foreign state, I dare say I wouldn’t even particularly consider them enemies anymore…”

    I would be overjoyed if this happened but they would still be the same just contained a bit.

    Like

    • Sam J.
      February 8, 2017

      “…more anti-white because of their globalism…”

      Well does it even matter WHY they are anti-White…no.

      One the most serious problems is it is extremely likely that they own everything and I mean everything. They were bailed out by at least $16 trillion in the bank bail outs, much more actually, and the whole damn New York stock exchange stocks were like $15 trillion. They bought everything. They have so much money it’s difficult to fight them.

      Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on January 4, 2017 by and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: