Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

The Devil’s Marxists

captain-spaulding

Sid Haig as Captain Spaulding in House of 1,000 Corpses

Rob Zombie (stage name of Massachusetts native Robert Cummings) has, since the moonrise of the twenty-first century, made a name for himself as a filmmaker with outings such as his hyper-violent Halloween franchise resuscitations for the Weinstein Company. Zombie’s sadistic diptych House of 1,000 Corpses (2003) and The Devil’s Rejects (2005) constitutes perhaps the quintessential statement of the torture porn philosophy on film. Trivializing and even eroticizing the acts of torture and murder, the films offer what, on the surface, would seem to be a typical Hollywood rendering of that threat to American modernity, the Texas redneck. This should come as no surprise in view of the fact that the films were produced by Madonna’s and U2’s manager Guy Oseary – an Israeli and “hardcore Jew”1. Scurrying under the floorboards of Zombie’s nightmare movie vision are indications of a distinctly un-Texan origin.

guy-oseary

Guy Oseary

“Growing up, I had the weird fantasy list,” Zombie has said. “I wanted to be Alice Cooper, Steven Spielberg, and Stan Lee” – triangulating a creepy Jewish show business persona and sanctioner of secret identities – and Zombie attained his aspiration through a “psychotic drive”2. Zombie’s thematic relationship with Jewishness is inextricable from his music, aesthetic preoccupations, and misanthropic philosophy. Of Captain Spaulding (familiar exploitation movie heavy Sid Haig), the clown-faced psycho proprietor of a murder-themed tourist trap in House of 1,000 Corpses, Zombie says, “We wanted him to be a lovable asshole. […] I guess he’s sort of like […] Don Rickles was a serial killer.”3 “Yeah, I wanted the audience to cheer ‘em,” the director said of the Firefly family of serial butcherers in his films. He claims, however, that “I didn’t consciously think of it at the time […] But it’s like when you saw Beetlejuice and you could tell all Tim Burton cared about was Beetlejuice.”4

Just as intriguing – but, again, not surprising given the involvement of “hardcore Jew” Guy Oseary – is Zombie’s decision to make creative murderer Otis B. Driftwood (Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2’s Bill Moseley) into a kind of super-aggressive American patriot (perfect entertainment for the newly minted neoconservative age of the “War on Terror”): “Otis is wearing his […] ‘Burn This Flag’ shirt, which some people thought was anti-American, but it was very American,” Zombie explains. “Otis is challenging you to burn that flag, and if you try it, he’ll kill you.”5 This “very American” character proceeds to turn Bill (Rainn Wilson), one of his captives in the titular house, into a corpse sculpture called “Fishboy” – probably intended as a mockery of Christianity since the scene of Fishboy’s creation involves Bill being mutilated and taunted while bound in a crucifixion pose.

Haig, interviewed about his Captain Spaulding character for a bonus feature included on the Blu-ray release of the film, confirms the neocon-torture-porn connection inherent in House’s political context:

I am the epiphany of the ‘Merican spirit. I am what this country used to be all about, which means, you wanna fuck with me, you best bring all yo’ shit. ‘Cause I don’t care ‘bout no Berlin Walls, no 38th parallel, no drawn lines in the goddamn sand. You piss me off, I’m gonna come over there and put my boot up y’ass. Oh yeah.6

These remarks are reminiscent of the Toby Keith song “Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue (The Angry American)”, which was recorded (for Spielberg, Katzenberg, and Geffen’s DreamWorks Records, sold shortly thereafter to Universal, which also released House of 1,000 Corpses during this period) at the insistence of Marine Corps Commandant James L. Jones7. “We’ll put a boot in your ass,” the song declares of Americans’ intention to forcibly insert footwear into an adversary’s rectum, because “it’s the American way.” The millions of flag-brandishers in the audience of Sean Hannity’s radio program, which uses this snippet from “Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue” to open each broadcast, have apparently never questioned Keith’s claim that sadomasochistic sodomy is a faithful representation of the American way of life – and Captain Spaulding clearly approves. (It may also be worth mentioning here that Haig, who has a distinctively large and bulbous nose, was born Sidney Eddy Mosesian.)

It is not until the House of 1,000 Corpses sequel The Devil’s Rejects, however, that the subtextual Jewishness of Zombie’s killers is made explicit. In this outing, Zombie reveals that the Texas clan of killers and necrophiliacs uses aliases lifted from Marx brothers movies. “Captain Spaulding” is Groucho Marx’s character in Animal Crackers (1930); “Otis B. Driftwood” is the same actor’s character in A Night at the Opera (1935); “Rufus Firefly”, played by Robert Mukes, takes his name from Groucho’s part in Duck Soup (1933); and “Grampa Hugo” (Dennis Fimple) echoes Groucho’s character “Hugo Z. Hackenbush” in A Day at the Races (1937). While these allusions might seem like a simple element of whimsy introduced into the script to appeal to film buffs, the adulation of Marx is actually highly significant. Zombie is hereby situating himself and his cohorts of the torture porn generation in a succession of Jewish-subversive pop-cultural currents.

rob-guy-ben

Rob Zombie with Guy Oseary and Ben Stiller

Harmless as Marx brothers films seem today, the fact of the matter is that these were ethnically hostile assaults directed at European dignity. “I wouldn’t dream of missing a Harpo or Groucho film, even if I were warned that the picture isn’t pure Marxism,” applauded radical publisher Emanuel Haldeman-Julius8. Monkey Business (1931) is perhaps the most revealing of their movies, and serves as an allegorical blueprint for Jewish immigrants’ subversion of American government and society – a cinematic Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. This is not a public service on Zombie’s part – no effort at awakening the goyim – but gloating over the industry’s power to warp the minds of the gullible. The writer-director of House of 1,000 Corpses and The Devil’s Rejects, by his own admission, sympathizes with the family of serial killers. Zombie’s next project is actually slated to be a movie about the life of Groucho Marx, whom he obviously regards and reveres as one of the pioneering godfathers of cultural rot – perhaps even what might be termed cultural Marxism9.

william-forsythe

William Forsythe as Sheriff Wydell in The Devil’s Rejects

The essence of this enterprise is the enslavement of all of non-Jewish mankind – the reduction of the goyim to the function of livestock. Appropriately, The Devil’s Rejects sets its climactic moments on a cattle ranch. “I was big on the cows,” Zombie acknowledges in his commentary. “I was always trying to wrangle the cows in the shot because […] I felt that cows were solid production value”10; but the cattle clearly have more meaning than Zombie is prepared to own. Sheriff Wydell (William Forsythe), obsessed with revenge for his brother’s murder in House of 1,000 Corpses, captures the Firefly family and lights two of them on fire – his intention apparently being to “holocaust” the undesirables – but then sets Baby Firefly (Sheri Moon Zombie) free in order to chase her around the farm. Lurking among the cattle pens, Wydell can be heard, briefly and almost imperceptibly, to mutter a “moo” in imitation of the animals, which symbolically links him with their plight. “We, here, we are playin’ on a level that most will never see,” he says in reference to the movie’s esoteric narrative layer of the struggle between the Aryan and the Jew. The cows are to have no revenge this night, and dimwitted Firefly kinsman Tiny (Matthew McGrory) – a burn victim and therefore a “holocaust survivor” – comes to Baby’s aid and sets his people free when he brutally snaps Sheriff Wydell’s neck. “Now here’s where you think the audience would be upset,” Zombie observes; “but every time I show this it gets a huge round of applause when the good guy dies.”11

It is eminently fitting that an American priding himself on such an accomplishment would emerge from a rock band calling itself “White Zombie”.

Happy Halloween!

Rainer Chlodwig von K.

Endnotes

  1. Ian, Scott [i.e., Scott Ian Rosenfeld]; and Jon Wiederhorn. I’m the Man: The Story of That Guy from Anthrax. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press, 2014, p. 206.
  2. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/r/robzombie595830.html
  3. Zombie, Rob. “Audio Commentary” (special feature). Zombie, Rob, Dir. House of 1,000 Corpses [Blu-ray] (2003). Santa Monica, CA: Lionsgate, 2011.
  4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_of_1000_Corpses#Casting
  5. Zombie, Rob. “Audio Commentary” (special feature). Zombie, Rob, Dir. House of 1,000 Corpses [Blu-ray] (2003). Santa Monica, CA: Lionsgate, 2011.
  6. “Interviews” (special feature). Zombie, Rob, Dir. House of 1,000 Corpses [Blu-ray] (2003). Santa Monica, CA: Lionsgate, 2011.
  7. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Courtesy_of_the_Red,_White_and_Blue_(The_Angry_American)
  8. Haldeman-Julius, Emanuel. The World of Haldeman-Julius. New York, NY: Twayne Publishers, 1960, p. 150.
  9. Guerrero, Agustin. “Rob Zombie to Direct Groucho Marx Biopic”. Screen Rant (June 17, 2015): http://screenrant.com/rob-zombie-groucho-marx-movie/
  10. Zombie, Rob. “Audio Commentary” (special feature). Zombie, Rob, Dir. The Devil’s Rejects [Blu-ray] (2005). Santa Monica, CA: Lionsgate, 2011.
  11. Ibid.
Advertisements

About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

64 comments on “The Devil’s Marxists

  1. icareviews
    October 28, 2016

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  2. kerberos616
    October 28, 2016

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

  3. Hipster Racist
    October 28, 2016

    Whenever I think of Rob Zombie, all I can think of is his classic duet with Randy Newman.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. Sam J.
    October 28, 2016

    Toby Keith song “Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue (The Angry American)” I always hated that song.

    I used to be blind to the general scheme of the Jews. I would watch their movies and found a lot of them offensive but didn’t notice exactly what they were doing was to belittle and attack Whites. It’s gets tougher and tougher to watch any of their movies after you figure out what they’re all about. It ceases to be entertaining.

    Liked by 2 people

  5. BMan
    October 29, 2016

    Excellent, Sir!

    I never got in to Zombie’s movies (nor did I know he was in a rock band). All of these connections and hidden meanings are very interesting.

    The MadTV clip was funny as hell.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. BMan
    October 29, 2016

    Reblogged this on B'Man's Revolt and commented:
    A Halloween gift from Rainer.

    Like

  7. homerbuford
    October 29, 2016

    The religion of the (((edomites))) is heavily symbolized in Beetlejuice (((the movie)))
    The Jews believe their saviour (((Nimrod))) master mason who built the pyramids and if course Babylon is going to return and restore the world to it’s PARTY HARD state before the flood. The condition before great flood was as you see it now. Filthy and immoral beyond the boundary of description
    Betalguese (((beetle juice))) is the Orange planet off to the left of the headless constellation of Orion.While it looks tiny it is said to be 600 million miles in diameter. This makes the our planet the size of a mere pixel in comparison. (Google Betalguese for a mind stretching exercise)
    In the film (((beetle juice))) the ever present Jewish finger prints are obvious: black and white checkered floor, spiral staircase, the basement and the black and white stripped shirt, to name a few. The movie THE MATRIX is just loaded with symbols that are too obvious to ignore .
    Short story long: the Jews who triggered 911 in JEW YORK, allowed a creature from the other side to enter in at ground zero(((stargate))). If you think that the world is insane now, you’ve seen nothing. Billions of people are about to die to appease these depraved children of Satan, the Jews. The saviour said it then and he is on his way with ten thousands of warriors and it is not for peace and it is not to welcome and embrace the goddamned Jew. Caveat!

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      October 29, 2016

      The Jews believe their saviour (((Nimrod))) master mason who built the pyramids and if course Babylon is going to return and restore the world to it’s PARTY HARD state before the flood.

      No Jews believe any of that. None of that has anything to do with the orthodox Jewish religion, nor any variant of the Jewish religion at all. It sounds like something the “Black Hebrews” thought up. “We wuz Kangs!”

      Short story long: the Jews who triggered 911 in JEW YORK, allowed a creature from the other side to enter in at ground zero(((stargate))).

      Don’t bogart that joint, my friend!

      Like

      • homerbuford
        October 29, 2016

        Experts Don’t need YouTube, weed, or your gutteral mutterings.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        October 29, 2016

        Are you an expert on (((stargates?)))

        Are these somehow inter-dimensional Jews from outer space?

        If I’m missing the parody here, I’m sorry.

        Like

      • homerbuford
        October 29, 2016

        You missed it all. No worries, g’day

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        October 29, 2016

        So you are suggesting that it’s not a parody. You actually believe that the Biblical character “Nimrod” was a “master mason” and actually “built the pyramids” somehow plays a role in the Jewish religion, and that on 9/11, Jews “allowed a creature from the other side to enter in at ground zero(((stargate)))” – presumably, this has something to do with outerspace inter-dimesntional Jews.

        If you are NOT high as a kite, you’re mentally ill. That sort of sci-fi religious nutjobbery belongs at a Dindu Temple of the Black Hebrew Israelites meeting.

        Are you black?

        Like

      • homerbuford
        October 29, 2016

        You miss it completely, dunce. Now I attempted to just now out. We Don’t gee and haw and You are a punk who would never talk to my face. Enjoy your delusions and goodbye

        Like

  8. Pingback: The Devil's Marxists: Rob Zombie's Neocon Horrors Exposed

  9. smartwhiteguy
    October 29, 2016

    Reblogged this on murderbymedia3.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. smartwhiteguy
    October 29, 2016

    I’v always intuitively hated Marx Bros movies.
    Just a bunch of smart assed yids running around messing things up.
    Very annoying.

    Liked by 1 person

    • bob saffron
      October 29, 2016

      Me too. There wasn’t one likeable Marx brother. I hated them and Seinfeld too, long before I become an “anti-Semite”.

      Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      October 29, 2016

      Marx brothers movies are great from the standpoint of entertainment, but you’re right that it’s difficult to watch them and not feel an anger on some level at what they knew and what their audiences didn’t know.

      Liked by 1 person

      • smartwhiteguy
        October 30, 2016

        Seriously, I’ve know way more than my fair share of tribal members and that’s exactly what they do, constantly. They create confusion and disorder and humiliate people, especially respectable people with noble ideals.
        I fail to see what entertaining about that.
        I also don’t like comedy that’s based on people doing stupid things. Most of the Laurel and Hardy shorts were like that.
        I think Buster Keaton is awesome though.

        Like

      • icareviews
        October 30, 2016

        Well, most comedy, when you come down to it, is based on some sort of sublimated experience of misfortune or discord. If you take away the bad things that people turn into laughs, what are you left with? Puns? Knock-knock jokes and “Why did the chicken cross the road” tier juvenile stuff? I love Laurel and Hardy, and I think comedy can play a valuable function in transforming negative experiences into an enjoyable catharsis; but at the same time we should be vigilant about where that function is abused and weaponized – which pretty well describes most of the comedy that’s around today.

        Like

      • smartwhiteguy
        October 30, 2016

        Yes, but seriously, how many times can you watch some poor schmuck moving a piano up a flight of stairs and having to start over because as soon as he get’s near the top something happens to it that makes it slide all the way back down to the bottom?
        That kind of shit just drives me fucking nuts!

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        October 30, 2016

        How do you think Sisyphus felt?

        Liked by 1 person

      • smartwhiteguy
        October 30, 2016

        I’m sure he was vexed those jew script writers stole his gag but changed it just enough so that he couldn’t sue.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        October 30, 2016

        “Why did the chicken cross the road” is famous because it’s the ultimate example of a “broken joke.”

        Q: Why did the chicken cross the road?

        A: Being run over would be a merciful release from the horrors of factory farming, America’s shame.

        http://ask.metafilter.com/151893/Luckily-there-are-enough-parachutes-for-everyone-Evacuation-is-orderly

        Functioning joke:

        A horse walks into a bar. The bartender asks “why the long face”?

        Why does this joke function?

        Horses do not usually enter bars.

        All horses have long faces, therefore assuming they are miserable as a result is pointless.

        We can break the joke at either of these points, with slightly varying results:

        A horse walks into a bar. The barman immediately asks the customers to remain calm and quiet while he attempts to placate the horse and lead it back outside to its owner.

        A horse walks into a bar. The bartender asks “why the long face”?

        The horse regards him silently and lugubriously, reflecting mournfully on the events of several years ago leading to his wife’s affair and their eventual acrimonious divorce.

        A man walks into a bar and orders a triple whiskey. The barman refuses to serve him; he is a notorious alcoholic and trouble-maker.

        A Catholic priest, a rabbi and a prominent atheist thinker are sitting in a pub. They have an insightful and good-natured discussion on the role of ethics in public life, then go their separate ways.

        Yo momma so fat, she suffers from quite severe respiratory problems and I wish her and your family all the best at this difficult time.

        Q: How many racists does it take to change a lightbulb?

        A: One, assuming a certain minimal level of manual dexterity.

        A horse walks into a bar where Walt Whitman and Ezra Pound are drinking.
        BARTENDER (to horse): Why the long face?
        WHITMAN (to everyone): I, too, am a horse.
        POUND (to Whitman): Shut the fuck up.

        So, there were an Irishman, an Englishman and an American wrecked on an island. One day, they found a bottle, and when they opened it, a ghost came out and offered them each a wish. However, even though they wished for different stuff, nothing happened, as the three guys of varying nationalities were just having shared hallucinations from hunger.

        Maybe I’m just weird but I find them hilarious.

        Like

      • Apollonius
        October 30, 2016

        I felt exactly the same way about the Three Stooges. Actually, you can add vulgar Jewish animation like the Loony Tunes and Tom and Jerry to that list as well. I always despised those cartoons as a child. You don’t have to watch these examples very closely to discern a common Judaic stench of tacky superficiality and especially “cheap” laughs. Jewish comedy is really just cheap laughs in its essence.

        There is no idealism of any kind. Compare W.C Fields to the Marx Brothers and you’ll see the difference. They’re both physical comedies, but they are totally distinct in spirit. The lack of idealism is the quintessential Jewish signature in all art, generally.

        Like

      • Apollonius
        October 30, 2016

        “…the Toby Keith song “Courtesy of the Red, White, and Blue (The Angry American)”, which was recorded (for Spielberg, Katzenberg, and Geffen’s DreamWorks Records…”

        “Growing up, I had the weird fantasy list,” Zombie has said. “I wanted to be Alice Cooper, Steven Spielberg, and Stan Lee…”

        Isn’t it fascinating how pervasive Judaization of American culture has become? Indeed, there seems to be a shocking congruence between Americanism and what can only be called the Jewish mentality or Jewish worldview.

        The naive assertion of superiority and blind, bloodthirsty hatred of the enemy are very Judaic elements that define that Toby Keith song, for instance. And this is isn’t really a recent phenomenon either; Irving Berlin wrote “God Bless America”; “Captain America” and “Superman” were thoroughly Jewish–and also American–characters. Even our shopping malls–and thus a great part of the “consumer culture”–were invented by a Jew. Hell, the first true suburb was Levittown built by the Jew William Levitt. And this is all besides Hollywood.

        Doesn’t this strike anyone as rather bizarre? I don’t think that this situation has any precedent in the history of Western Civilization. Even the Weimar era was still somewhat traditional in that there was a “German” mentality that was distinct from a Jewish” mentality. But what is the “American” mentality? Whatever it is, it is alien and hostile to the European spirit as I understand it.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        October 30, 2016

        It’s all rather easily explained, and there is no reason to go to the nRX route and blame the Protestants and the Enlightenment, or the Catholic superstitious route and blame the Freemasons.

        The Judaization of American culture comes from the advent of mass media, and the fact that Jews have run the mass media since the days of radio.

        Watching a bunch of old 1960s sitcoms, I noticed how often quite Gentile-presenting characters would slip in an “oy vey” for no apparent reason. Presumably it was a wink and a nod from the Jewish producers to the Jews in the audience.

        The old time American WASPs always found the entertainment business to be somewhat low-class and inherently immoral – they didn’t really want anything to do with it. Especially post-WWII, as long as the Jews that ran Hollywood would broadcast pro-American propaganda, they were content to allow the Jews to run that disreputable industry. This was, of course, short-sighted.

        The Catholics – who had more experience dealing with Jewish power – put up a good fight, but the Jews just gave them enough rope to hang themselves. The Catholic celibate priesthood was always a contradiction, a big closet for homosexuals and other sexual degenerates to hide in plain sight (even E. Michael Jones admits that homosexuality is the Achilles Heel of a celibate priesthood.) Real Americans watched the early Catholic TV shows – hosted by ridiculous closeted gays in effeminate frippery and jewelry – and understandably snickered along with the Jews TV shows that slowly but surely displaced them.

        The WASPs – i.e., Real Americans – were busy fighting a two-front cultural war, caught between the Catholics and the Jews, sometimes teaming with one against the other.

        It was FDR – who let’s remember became an American dictator due to the new mass media technology, radio, who was completely co-opted by the Jews and the British. The “American First” anti-war movement and the anti-immigration movement pre-war was the last gasp of WASP America; by the time America won War War II the CIA (itself not just co-opted but all but founded by Jews and British) had turned itself into a cultural force, directing Hollywood and the mass media from behind the scenes with the willing and enthusiastic cooperation of the Jews.

        Americanism could have gone in two directions. The WASP Freemasons had all but abandoned Protestantism – Christianity including Catholicism itself being thoroughly Jewish – and were on the way to a scientific, Darwinist, eugenic, racially conscious liberalism. They even had “restricted clubs” which were completely Jew-free. But the 1960s saw the WASP establishment trip over itself prosecuting the awful Vietnam war, and the Jews were able to take advantage of the resulting cultural conflicts and stage their cultural revolution – by way of the TV more than anything else.

        Imperialism ruined Americanism and the mass media allowed Jews to co-opt anti-imperialist sentiment into the current anti-white zeitgeist.

        Catholic conspiracy theories about Freemasons aside, Masonic style fraternities were the backbone of Americanism – it protected the American establishment from the foreign influence of Catholics and Jews. Even post WWII, Protestant military figures complained about the Jewish hatreds exposed during the Nuremberg trials. Jews spent a lot of time attacking the WASP fraternities – the Superman radio show helped defamed the second Klan, the Honeymooners relentlessly mocked working class fraternities like the Moose Lodge and the Elks Club.

        The mass media is culturally harmful in and of itself – it would have been a disaster no matter who ran it. But the combination of Jewish control of the mass media since the beginning and a WASP establishment caught between two hostile groups and engaging in Empire building they were never cut out for proved to be the perfect storm.

        To right the ship, the last thing we need is to slip back into Catholic superstition, as the Vatican is little more than a leftist NGO at this point whose sole power is inducing sexual shame in Catholic schoolchildren. To restore America, we simply need to pick up where the WASP establishment left off in the 1920s – eugenics, racism, a healthy anti-semitism and it’s necessary partner, anti-papistry, and a culture based on a scientific understanding of the human condition.

        As the “Alt Left” guy points out, really the only thing the various factions of the “Alt Right” have in common is racial and sexual realism – i.e., racism and sexism. A healthy modern liberalism based on the realities of sex and race is really all we need. Everyone else is just pushing their special interests, from the philo-semites of the “Alt Light” to the anti-racists of the “Alt West” to the crypto-Papists of the NRx.

        If Bill Gates and Warren Buffet would just leave a substantial endowment to Richard Spencer’s NPI we’d be well on the way to recovery.

        Like

      • icareviews
        October 30, 2016

        I was about to hit the “like” button on your comment until I came to the part about the NPI endowment. Judging by Spencer’s behavior this year, he probably would have blown it on Trump propaganda.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        October 30, 2016

        The only person that is in the bag for Trump more than Spencer is David Duke. According to Duke, to not vote for Trump is “a vote against your own heritage.” So I guess we should all be against Duke as well?

        Kevin MacDonald is for Trump. Jared Taylor is for Trump. So if supporting Trump is the acid test, then there’s literally no one except for, I guess, Renegade, Shiksa Goddess, and Kyle “Flat Earth” Hunt.

        My objection was to Trump worship and the ridiculous nonsense that Trump had some “secret plan against the Jews” and the like. But knowing what we know about Trump, he’s still better than Clinton and he’s still better than any of the GOPers he ran against.

        Frankly the enemies Spencer has made makes me like him even more – Tard Youth hates him. Renegade hates him. Basically, every costume clown, LARPer, and ankle biter is against Spencer. The (((Daily Stormer))) hates him so much they make up pornographic homoerotic fantasies about him (Anglin admits he can’t even think about Spencer without having gay sex in his head.) He gets the hostility he does precisely because he is smarter, more effective – and better looking – than any of the “also rans.”

        Going forward, Spencer will do far more for the white cause than Duke will. I think they choice is clear. I’m saving up for my Phalanx membership – the fraternity I always called for. I know Spencer has read me on occasion, so I’ll take credit for the idea.

        Like

      • icareviews
        October 30, 2016

        Duke’s endorsement of Trump is indeed embarrassing, but he knows better than to believe that Trump is the real deal. He would even admit as much before he declared his candidacy for the Senate. A member of his campaign team said hitching the Duke candidacy to the Trump Train was just the strategy that they thought would work best to get Duke in the Senate. Personally, I think it’s a mistake to go for anything but the truth in any situation, so I respectfully disagree with the Duke team’s strategy. That’s also why I can’t endorse Spencer. He’s smart and presents himself well, but he’s too open to shady associations. Duke is running for public office and compromising his message to appeal to a mainstream electorate. Spencer, on the other hand, is a metapolitician and trying to shape the discourse of white nationalism with a view to future organization. He isn’t trying to sway cuckservatives to his side next week; so why even pretend to be pro-Israel? Why associate with Roger Stone or Donald Trump? What the hell does indulgence toward Israel offer to anybody who’s genuinely interested in white sovereignty?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        October 30, 2016

        Spencer has done a better job than most – he actually used my line – “we should use Trump, not let Trump use us.” Spencer has openly and on numerous occasions said that Trump “isn’t one of us” and made the distinction between Trump-style civic nationalism and White Nationalism. Spencer even went so far as to say that he supports Trump more for style than substance.

        So you can’t single out Spencer for criticism of his Trump support – considering he’s not even close to the worst offender – Duke is worse, really even MacDonald is worse. MacDonald and Taylor actually stabbed Bob Whitaker in the back over Trump – and Bob Whitaker is probably second only to MacDonald himself as far as the most valuable pro-white voice out there.

        If I were to come up with the pro-White dream team, I’d have MacDonald as the chief philosopher, Whitaker as the chief propagandist, and Spencer as the chief spokesman. Those three, in their own ways, have each broken out of the stupid WN ghetto – without compromising the message.

        Spencer’s post-Hillary “Alt Right” press conference was fucking masterful. He successfully leveraged Trump’s popularity to get some publicity for the pro-white cause. No one else has even come close – you just can’t argue with success.

        A member of his campaign team said hitching the Duke candidacy to the Trump Train was just the strategy that they thought would work best to get Duke in the Senate.

        Which is exactly what Spencer has done. Thanks to his vocal support for Trump, NPI is now on the map. Spencer never suggested giving money to Trump – Spencer never suggested toning down the message to avoid “embarrassing Trump” like others have done. Spencer even suggested volunteering for the Trump campaign as a form of entryism.

        So not only is Spencer ideologically close to perfect, he’s also tactically and strategically smart.

        he’s too open to shady associations

        Spencer? How? Dugin? Big deal. Even the whole Jack Donovan thing was a big nothingburger except the Tard Corral – along with the $PLC – used it as an excuse to try to tear Spencer down out of sheer jealousy of his success. That Tila Tequila woman? Come on, that’s just comic relief.

        Spencer disinvited Hungry Hungry Heimbach from the NPI conference – that was a stunning display of good judgement, good timing, and heading off an actual threat.

        so why even pretend to be pro-Israel? Why associate with Roger Stone

        Spencer went to a party and met with Roger Stone. How in the world is that in any way a bad thing? That’s a good thing. As far as his “support” for Israel – I’ll take Spencer at his word. He said he admires the Zionist movement because it was successful at getting an ethnic homeland. Isn’t that what we want? I admire the Zionists for the same reason. Not only is Spencer being honest in that case, he’s also being strategically smart. His answer about Jews and Zionist and the press conference was masterful.

        There is a world of difference between Spencer’s comments on Israel and the philo-semitism and Zionism of something like the EDL. The reason people were rightfully suspicious of pro-Israel advocacy is because the Jews were running organizations like EDL, kicking out all the White ethnic nationalists while promoting “all races against the Muslims and for Israel” line.

        Spencer hasn’t done anything even close to any of that – he has, on numerous occasions, rejected such a thing. So even if Spencer were to invite a Jew to speak at NPI, it wouldn’t matter, because NPI simply cannot be co-opted that way.

        I agree it’s good to be honest, but that doesn’t mean we have to be churlish. Holy fuck, I’ve shaken hands with Wes Clark – I even drunkenly hit on Al Franken’s daughter. Do I now have Globalist rabies and am forever compromised because I touched a Zionist Jew? If that’s the standard, McZogowitz is right and we may as well resign ourselves to giving each other DNA tests to make sure we’re no more than 10% potato nigger.

        I have yet to see any indication whatsoever that Spencer is about to sell us out, EDL style, in order to curry favor with Israelis.

        Like

      • icareviews
        October 30, 2016

        He’s already demonstrated to them that his lips are sealed as far as 9/11 guilt. Spencer is strictly a dealer in half-truths. He’s okay as far as presenting to the public an image of white nationalist activism that doesn’t involve tattoos, shaved heads, or street fights, but I still wouldn’t overestimate his worth or his virtue.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        October 30, 2016

        Duke isn’t exactly a 9/11 truther either. In fact, no one is. Spencer hasn’t attacked truthers unlike, say, Greg Johnson. Susan Lindauer is a 9/11 truther, but she supports Trump, so she’s out too? If that’s the criticism, everyone is out except for the very occasional mainstream figure like Paul Craig Roberts. Besides, 9/11 truth and White advocacy are completely orthogonal concerns. The real 9/11 truth movement would make a mistake to involve itself in White advocacy – and vice versa.

        It’s all so much making the perfect the enemy of the good.

        There are legitimate criticisms of Spencer. He’s kind of boring. I don’t even bother to read his movie reviews. His White Empire stuff is somewhat ridiculous and pie-in-the-sky. But for some reason, that’s not why people criticize Spencer. 99% of the criticism of him is either completely subversive, obvious $PLC talking points – like Renegade’s newest attack saying his wife isn’t really white – I guess calling him gay wasn’t convincing enough. Or it’s just pure narcissistic rage that he won’t associate with someone – like the Tard Youth.

        I don’t see how his worth and virtue can be overestimated, considering the (lack of) alternatives.

        It’s amazing how Spencer is held to some impossibly high standard that no one else is. There’s just no pleasing some people.

        Like

      • icareviews
        October 30, 2016

        Duke tweeted about the Dancing Israelis even after announcing for the Senate. Who else does that? When has Spencer even acknowledged the possibility of Jewish involvement in 9/11? Lindauer seems like pretty weak water to me. In one of those videos you posted, all she seemed to want to talk about was Trump and Snowden – controlled opposition and limited hangouts. Spencer is held to a high standard because he has potential and because he presents himself and is presented by others both inside and outside white advocacy as a leader – sometimes even as THE leader, whether he claims that title or not. I’m interested in the truth, which means that I’ll talk about 9/11, race, or whatever else happens to concern me at the moment. Those can be entirely separate discussions for some people; but for me white sovereignty and Jewish-Israeli parasitism are part of the same discussion. You can’t accomplish the former without eradicating the latter.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        October 30, 2016

        Sisyphus’ punishment was for deceitful behaviour. He got what was coming to him.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        October 30, 2016

        @ Apollonius:
        The contrast with Japanese childrens cartoons – which I loved – is striking.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        October 31, 2016

        icareviews,”…I think it’s a mistake to go for anything but the truth in any situation, so I respectfully disagree with the Duke team’s strategy. That’s also why I can’t endorse Spencer…Duke is running for public office and compromising his message to appeal to a mainstream electorate.”

        Not meaning to be overtly critical but hasn’t the “upright” honest truthful way gotten us to where we are today? The sneaky underhanded Jews run everything by being sneaky and underhanded. Proclaiming love for all in the World and making small dog whistles to their supporters. Maybe we should try that.

        Once we get in power cut off their oxygen, The FED, The Foundations, AIPAC, turn the whole spying establishment on the Jews(they built this massive spying establishment for us. It would be glorious to turn it on them. The lower ranks of the intelligence service I bet have no love for the Jews), decentralize the media, fire everyone at NPR and put our people in, attack the cable companies and SJW stations through unbundling channels, defund the SJW colleges and attack them every time they poke their heads up. The cucks could have done this but they failed.

        I think Spencer doesn’t attack the Jews because at this time it’s not productive. At the same time we need people like Storm Front to attack them constantly in the crudest way possible. We also need people like Trump talking about the “International Bankers” to round things out. They need to be attacked in numerous ways from all sides, in many manners.

        You mentioned Shiksa goddess. I really like her. The two videos on Induced Neurosis were really good. I had never heard of those experiments she referenced.

        Shiksa Goddess – Induced neurosis and how it’s used on us (Goyim Goddess).mp4

        Shiksa Goddess – Induced Neurosis Part II (Goyim Goddess) – YouTube.webm

        Here’s a meme I thought up. “White people are hogging all the diversity on the planet. We should stop immigration until the other countries can catch up to our level of diversity”.

        Like

      • icareviews
        November 1, 2016

        I wouldn’t suggest to you that only one strategy works while all others are worthless. Just as there are all sorts of people in the world who need to get the identitarian message, there will need to be all sorts of phrasings for that message tailored to their tastes, susceptibilities, or prejudices. Let there be a market for white nationalisms, just like liberals get to have The Nation, MSNBC, Ellen, NPR, the View, Michael Moore, and the Daily Show. This site, to the extent that it’s political, is about metapolitics. It’s not designed to appeal to the average NASCAR fan, but to people who are already awake and interested. I’m writing about the whole truth as I perceive it, for the benefit of my fellows. That’s why I don’t plan on wasting time promoting Richard Spencer as the best thing going today. If he has the master plan that’s going to save Europa, I wish him the best. Let him demonstrate what he can do. If he saves us, I’ll credit him for his work.

        Like

    • Sam J.
      October 31, 2016

      I agree. I never liked the Narx brothers either. I admit to a fondness for the three Stooges though.

      Liked by 1 person

      • smartwhiteguy
        November 1, 2016

        I used to HATE those idiots when I was a kid, but now that I’m an adult they don’t annoy me so much anymore.

        Like

  11. guest
    October 29, 2016

    All of a sudden anime doesn’t look so bad, does it Hipster.

    Also who would have believed that the communist Chinese would end up buying movie studios, and demand more conservative content, the commies out of all people, it’s like opposite world. You know it’s bad, or gefilte-fishy, if there’s too much cultural Marxism even for actual Marxists.

    Thank god we are over peak TV/HOLLYWOOD!

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      October 30, 2016

      All degenerate anime fans are still going in the ovens.

      Like

      • icareviews
        October 30, 2016

        Don’t fight it, Hipster. Come to the Dark Side.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        October 30, 2016

        Anime, cosplayers, bronies, trekkies, furries, comic bookers, and all nerd fandom will burn in eternal hellfire. Yiff in hell, furfags!

        Like

      • Apollonius
        October 30, 2016

        Does that include Star Wars, by any chance?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        October 30, 2016

        Coincidentally, I saw the last one, Force Awakens, just the other day. It was pretty terrible. Derivative, hackneyed.

        Watching movies is okay – dressing up on Halloween as a movie character is ok. But engaging in “fandom” should be grounds for at least exile from the White Republic, if not public execution.

        Like

      • Apollonius
        October 30, 2016

        That last movie was an atrocity. I dare say it was ANNUDAH SHOAH on the silver screen. But that was to be expected. The trailer should’ve been enough for me, but I got through about 2/3 of the film before I turned it off. It’s hilarious that the only honest reviews for it are from anonymous IMDB forum posters.

        Every published “critical” (LOL!) review was just nauseating and facile shilling for this piece of kosher Entartetekunst. I should write a letter to the studio saying that I survived the Abrams Shoah and that I demand reparations for the agony I was forced to endure at the hands of the hook-nosed oppressors. I cried out in despair six million times, and I am owed a shekel for every whimper…

        …A bit of an exaggeration perhaps, but only a little. I did greatly enjoy both prequel and sequel trilogies however. George Lucas has a very moving imaginative vision.

        Also, why White Republic? Why not White Kingdom or White Empire?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        October 30, 2016

        why White Republic? Why not White Kingdom or White Empire?

        My comment above anticipated this objection. A White Republic – not a Kingdom or an Empire – because I for one have no interest in dragging Catholicism back from a well-deserved grave.

        Like

      • guest
        October 30, 2016

        But it’s not all cute, that’s a stereotype, just ask Ryan Dawson, there’s plenty of normal anime, my favorites was the Robin Hood one and alike, hell i wasn’t even aware it was Japanese back in the day! Or space war and samurai stuff, no cuteness there at all. Anime is also at least free of cultural Marxism connotation and political correctness, it’s even explicit at times, nudity in cartoons, can you imagine! You won’t see that in Dora the explorer that’s for certain, no exploring of that sort.

        Hell, there is even a Heidi anime, Heidi! Anime is plenty European just by way of cultural appropriation. You won’t find gangs of rag tag minos fighting white bad guys here. My point is merely that people will watch something, and network TV is much worse than anime, just because you watch anime, it doesn’t mean you become obsessed with it.

        Does this animated war drama trailer look cute to you?

        “Grave of the Fireflies: A devastating meditation on the human cost of war, this animated tale follows Seita, a teenager charged with his younger sister after an American firebombing during World War II, they are forced to try to survive amidst widespread famine and the callous indifference of their countrymen.”

        Or this, and especially this one, no lolz or fur anywhere, just watch those trailers and marvel.

        The point being, better anime than marvel, or either nigger ball, because people will watch something, and there are only so many Leni Riefenstahl movies out there to watch… I bet an anime version of Triumph of the Will would sell!

        Or Trump of the will! The story of president Trump.

        Like

      • icareviews
        October 30, 2016

        “Anime is also at least free of cultural Marxism connotation and political correctness, it’s even explicit at times, nudity in cartoons, can you imagine! You won’t see that in Dora the explorer that’s for certain, no exploring of that sort.”

        Who the hell wants to see Dora the Explorer in the nude?

        I watched some anime when I was younger and have a mild affection for some of the movies like Wicked City and Twilight of the Cockroaches. It seems to become a death trap and an obsession for a lot of millennials, though.

        Like

      • guest
        October 30, 2016

        Never mind that anime is certified hip, what do you think hipsters watch on their phones when they sip pumpkin spice lattes? It’s anime, those are your latté people hipster! Only in anime will you see blacks referred to as gorillas.

        Like

  12. Senatssekretär Freistaat Danzig
    October 29, 2016

    Reblogged this on behindertvertriebentessarzblog.

    Like

  13. Pingback: The Devil’s Marxists: Rob Zombie’s (White Freemason) Neocon Horrors Exposed | News For The Blind

  14. Pingback: The Devil’s Marxists | Hipster Racist

  15. Hipster Racist
    October 31, 2016

    Just read the hit piece on Richard Spencer in Mother Jones, and they linked to a thread on Occidental Dissent from SEVEN years ago.

    http://www.occidentaldissent.com/2010/01/03/richard-spencer-leaves-takimag/

    Way back then, there were attempts to say Spencer’s wife wasn’t 100% White and may be partially “Tartar.” Because she had dyed her hair black, and she’s Russian.

    Yet just read the comments:

    “Wikitopian” (Matt Parrott) makes a few jokes about wanting to see more pictures of Spencer’s wife. Greg Johnson says that she’s so hot she’ll destroy the pro-White movement because few men could resist her.

    Hunter Wallace is complaining that Alex Linder – who apparently started the rumors in an attempt to attack Spencer – literally paints anyone who doesn’t openly call for the “extermination” of Jews as some sort of “conservative” sell out.

    So, as we can see – these attacks on Richard Spencer go back to the very beginning, when he was attempting to turn Taki’s (and before that, TAC) to a more overtly pro-White (and Jew-wise) direction.

    And who led the attacks seven years ago? Alex Linder, yet another (((Hollywood Nazi))) that attacks any pro-White who won’t literally call for the murder of “Jewish babies.”

    Back then – before the $PLC and Tard Youth tried to paint Spencer as gay – it never even crossed anyone’s mind that Spencer, the former football player with a model-hot wife – was in any way gay.

    Yet we now have people making up sexual fantasies of him “experimenting” in college? And the (((Daily Stormer))) trying to destroy the reputation of Phalanx by making up absurd gay rumors?

    This isn’t some idle speculation, nor is it just shit-talking.

    This is an underhanded attack – by (((Hollywood Nazis))) – in coordination with the $PLC – against one of the most prominent and effective pro-White public figures.

    And these lines of attack have now been resurrected by Renegade – at the prompting of a hit piece by the anti-white leftist magazine Mother Jones.

    What are we dealing with here? Alex Linder, Andrew Anglin, Tard Youth and the rest of the (((Hollywood Nazis))) – and now Renegade – are all acting in a coordinated fashion, along with the $PLC, to attack NPI the very second they start getting mainstream media attention. And Parrott was a big fan of Spencer, until Parrott’s son-in-law, Hungry Hungry Heimbach (another (((Hollywood Nazi))) was disinvited from the NPI conference because people were rightly concerned he’s stick his ugly face in front of a camera and say stupid shit – which he has a five year record of doing.

    Frankly people repeating this stuff are just drawing suspicion on to themselves.

    So far, there has been little to no legitimate criticism of Spencer – just personal attacks in coordination with the $PLC.

    I think some people have some explaining to do.

    Like

  16. Hipster Racist
    October 31, 2016

    Also interestingly, David Duke has been attacked in the exact same fashion. Still floating around is some hit piece by a supposed “WN” saying that Duke:

    1. Was a womanizer that had sex with non-white women.

    2. Was a bisexual – including yet another homoerotic piece of “slash fiction” about Duke having a bisexual affair with some other prominent WN.

    3. Allegations of stealing money and financial impropriety.

    The exact same attacks now used against Spencer and NPI.

    The attacks against Duke came at the precise time he was going “mainstream” and running for office – i.e., escaping from the dumb WN ghetto.

    It’s now a recognizable pattern.

    And there’s a recognizable profile of the people doing the attacking:

    1. (((Hollywood Nazis)))

    2. LARPers who are “more radical than thou.” People like Alex Linder who try to get people on the record advocating murder, terrorism, and even killing “Jewish babies.” (Linder tried to goad Hunter Wallace into saying he would literally murder Jewish babies on a radio show.)

    3. Men who – to put it delicately – are not likely to be successful with women and who probably didn’t play high school football either.

    Kind of funny too, Matt Parrott once wrote an anti-9/11 Truth hit piece titled “The Pattern Recognition Orgasm” that was meant to defame “conspiracy theorists” who notice patterns in events. Parrott also has a long track record of making allegations of sexual and financial impropriety against other men in the movement.

    I guess patterns that fit Matt Parrott himself, who falls into category 2 and 3 above (and his faux-son-in-law, category 1. Hungry Hungry Heimbach married Matt Parrott’s former wife’s daughter.)

    I, for one, think recognizing patterns is a sign of intelligence, but I can understand why some people wish we didn’t notice the obvious.

    Like

    • icareviews
      October 31, 2016

      Let’s recognize, though, that we’re selling a disingenuously constructed either-or situation if we say you’re either with Spencer or you’re with Linder. Spencer is clearly better than Linder in that he isn’t calling for mass murder; but I’m not just going to pretend that Spencer and his associates aren’t dishonest or strangely silent on some very important topics. Let’s take a look at the most recent articles at Radix, shall we? There’s an anonymous article titled “Beyond NATO” that I assume was written by Spencer or commissioned by him. The basic premise that NATO is useless is perfectly reasonable; but then we learn that, based on 9/11, “Radical Islamic terrorism— inspired by Wahhabi Islam out of Saudi Arabia—established itself as a major threat to Western hegemony”. The author goes on to float the libertarian blowback thesis while hinting at vague “discreet” (i.e. covert) U.S. support, but continues to endorse as genuine such suspicious events as Paris, Nice, San Bernadino, etc., and to claim toward the end of the article that “Islamic terrorism” constitutes one of the principal threats to “Atlantic security”. Why not just tell the truth – or at the least refrain from endorsing the lie? Then we have “Hillary and the Saudi Genie” by Derek Patrick (McZOG, man your battle station!). Oh, boy, this has to be some hard-hitting stuff, right? Let’s dig into it … Some Hillary-is-corrupt boilerplate. Okay, nothing wrong with that, but … who does the author say “apparently aided” in the perpetration of 9/11? The title gives it away of course: Saudi Arabs! You know, those guys who run Hollywood. Hillary, as it turns out, cherishes “insane pro-Sunni policy goals for Syria” that “align with those of her Saudi / Sunni billionaire backers”. Number one Israeli super PAC sugar daddy Haim Saban has nothing whatsoever to do with any of Hillary’s interest in the Middle East, I’m sure – so why even mention him, right? Sure, there are some very talented writers at Radix. I just don’t have the time to waste on half-truthing pap like this.

      Like

      • Apollonius
        October 31, 2016

        As I said in one of my first comments on this blog, Greg Johnson and Richard Spencer are masters of misdirection. Their refusal to expose the Jewish lies about 9/11 leave their operations open to subversion, Zio-entryism, and mainstream co-opting such as your suspicions about Roger Stone and Trump.

        I believe that the basic reason for this is that these people are dilettantes pretending to be political activists. Holding conferences about immigration and Black crime and IQ is a safe and inoffensive way to get a bunch of upper-middle class, non-liberal, middle-aged White men together in a room to subscribe to your newsletter or buy your book. Why change a winning formula by discussing really nasty things like false flags, 9/11, Israeli atrocities, and Jewish Power? Why scare away your paying customers?

        “We are respectable dissidents, not some lunatic conspiracy theorists or anti-Semites!”

        These people aren’t really serious about politics. If they were, they would know that you can’t make any meaningful change in 21st Century American politics honestly without nailing down basic and critical issues like 9/11 and Israel. They either know and don’t care, or they are too oblivious and self-absorbed to understand. Either way, they are leading you down a blind alley. If you can’t tell the truth about fundamental questions, why should anyone listen?

        NPI and Amren are going exactly nowhere. But I hear that the dining services at those conferences get five stars.

        Don’t delay, tickets are on sale now!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        November 1, 2016

        Their refusal to expose the Jewish lies about 9/11 leave their operations open to subversion, Zio-entryism

        That’s just not true. NPI is not susceptible to Zio-entryism and of course Counter Currents isn’t either. EDL/AmRen style Zio-entryism has not and cannot work on NPI or CC, for many reasons, including the ones I mentioned earlier, and whether or not they talk about 9/11 (which they don’t in general) doesn’t have any effect on that at all.

        they are leading you down a blind alley.

        The personal smears aren’t working so we’re just coming up with new ones, making the perfect the enemy of the good. So – who is left to advocate for White people? No one.

        Spencer’s job isn’t to uncover the Deep State – his job is to be a public advocate for White people. At this point, he is pretty much the only effective person – more effective than Duke, by a mile.

        NPI and Amren are going exactly nowhere.

        Amren is getting better and NPI has put the term “alt right” on the map, and now White Identity politics has arrived in the mainstream.

        If that is “going nowhere” – yes, please, sign me up for that conference.

        Like

      • icareviews
        November 1, 2016

        I don’t agree with everything Renegade promotes. To the extent that they’re publishing or broadcasting worthwhile material, I’ll share it or participate. When they put up stories about how David Bowie faked his death and assumed a new identity or weird crap like that, I don’t give it the time of day. Some of the content there is a little on the zany side, admittedly; but based on my interactions with Renegade contributors, I think they’re for the most part genuine truth-seekers who happen to have a flair for the perhaps overly dramatic. The tone of a lot of the broadcasts is going to be a bit on the hardcore side for the average person’s taste, as well; but Renegade has its following just as Spencer has his. I don’t necessarily think they’re competing for the same audience, so there’s room in the universe for both.

        With AmRen, first you say that people either have to stand with Richard Spencer and AmRen or against them and with Alex Linder, Trad Youth, et al.; but then you say that AmRen is susceptible to “Zio-entryism”. So I either have to stand with Alex Linder or “Zio-entryism”? I reject such obviously false binaries. AmRen, I think, has its place, serving either as gateway or gatekeeper, depending on the viewpoint or individual audience member’s level of critical consciousness. I think they’re useful up to a point; but they’re ultimately half-truthers and shouldn’t be the truth-seeker’s final destination. Same goes for NPI.

        “Spencer’s job isn’t to uncover the Deep State – his job is to be a public advocate for White people.”

        Well, my job isn’t to lick Spencer’s ass. My job is to be Rainer, white nationalist essayist and critic, and to call it as I see it. Spencer can do his thing, and I’ll do mine.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 1, 2016

        NPI and Spencer are far superior to anything on Renegade, which posts weird religious Black Israelite level nonsense, attacks essentially everyone in the movement based on little substance, goes whole hog for every half baked conspiracy bullshit like “Flat Earth” and now is going full Vigilant Citizen with interpreting Illuminati Symbolism.

        So Spencer gets attacked for not straying too far out of the mainstream, but we’re willing to tolerate balls out bullshit of the like published by Renegade.

        And most of the time people aren’t attacking NPI for substance – it’s personal attacks against Spencer himself, clearly and obviously meant to demean him personally and hurt NPi fundraising.

        If people were complaining because NPI isn’t good on 9/11 truth and takes ISIS too seriously – something I have written about in the past rather extensively, name-checking Hood, Spencer, and Johnson – that’s one thing. That’s legitimate criticism.

        But 95% of the time it’s not legitimate criticism – it’s disinformation and personal smears.

        So, yeah, it kind of is an either or. You’re either on the side of NPI and the people who associate with NPI – Kevin MacDonald, Jared Taylor, VDare, etc.

        Or you’re on the side of the people that attack them – and that’s Renegade, Tard Youth, Alex Linder, and the rest of the costume clown brigade. (((Daily Stormer))) says “Jews did 9/11” – but that’s just another part of their trolling – it’s not like Anglin has anything intelligent to say about Operation Gladio or US sponsorship of ISIS. He just wants to be a “Nazi Anti-Semite.”

        And Kyle Hunt probably says “Jews did 9/11 too” but he also says that “Jew Science” is tricking everything into believe the earth isn’t flat, and they “Revealed the Method” by the name of their book – the Ka-BALL-ah. And Linder is of course calling everyone shills because we won’t state on the record that we should exterminate all Jews.

        Granted – all those costume clowns attack each other, but that’s the point.

        Should we attack Bollyn because while he’s good on 9/11, he’s “anti-racist?”

        Spencer isn’t being criticized fairly – he’s being smeared. And in predictable ways and for predictable reasons.

        Like

      • guest
        November 2, 2016

        Spencer just learned from Duke, if he picks up 911, that will be the first thing he will be ever asked, and he will be forever labeled a denier, like Duke is always and everywhere a rider of the apocalypse now.

        The other problem is that we are too far into it, there can be no America without 911, just like there can be no Israel without the holohoax. The hitlerian big lie works because sooner or later it must become a noble lie.

        Like

      • icareviews
        November 2, 2016

        “there can be no America without 911”

        Fuck America.

        Like

  17. bob saffron
    November 2, 2016

    @ HR: In what way are AMREN improving?

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: