Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

O.J. Simpson’s Ordeal in the Court of Public Opinion: Was It a Bloody Bundy Drive-By?

oj

I was only twelve years old when the discovery of the mutilated bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman initiated the media circus surrounding the grotesque “Trial of the Century” to determine whether or not Orenthal James Simpson had murdered his ex-wife and her friend outside her home on Bundy Drive in the Brentwood neighborhood of Los Angeles. Consequently, I took little interest and gleaned whatever I understood of the case from snippets of television and a general awareness of how “The Juice” was perceived by those around me. The certainty with which we all – we white Americans – accepted or even enthused at the thought of the guilt of the accused was such a natural matter of course that it never crossed my mind that Simpson might have been innocent of the charges – until this past week, that is, when, on a whim, I happened to listen to a series of podcasts addressing the twenty-first anniversary of the case and the lingering evidence of a frame-up perpetrated against the defendant.

redmond

Pearse Redmond

The intermittently frustrating and interesting Pearse Redmond, host of the Porkins Policy Review program, has, along with guests Brian Heiss and Stephen Singular – specifically, with episodes 47, 53, 61, and 62 – offered his listeners ample food for thought where the Simpson case is concerned. Singular, the author of Legacy of Deception: An Investigation of Mark Fuhrman and Racism in the L.A.P.D., has also written about the murder of Alan Berg and is keen to play up the possible “neo-Nazi” motivation for the framing of Simpson for the murders. Similarly, Heiss is an open promoter of “diversity” and clearly has an ideological stake in Simpson’s posited innocence. Redmond also annoys with his stubborn insistence on taking the street-clogging astroturf idiocy of the Black Lives Matter movement seriously. Notwithstanding the foregoing criticisms, however, I am encouraging those who read this to take the time to listen to the information and the arguments presented in Redmond’s retrospective series of podcasts and to judge the material on its merits and independently of any of the presenters’ advertised prejudices.

heiss

Brian Heiss

White nationalist wisdom, to the extent that such exists, indicates that Hebraic mainstream media spin elevates an imaginary black righteousness while vilifying the dispossessed majority – even to the absurd height of misrepresenting an episode of black thuggery during the Baltimore riots as some inebriated white woman’s attempted theft of an innocent black man’s purse. Hypothetically positing that the jury made the correct decision, was there any factor present in the Simpson case that would cause the mass of the media to override its habitual anti-white programming? Could it have been, for instance, that probing too deeply into the sordid life of Ron Goldman might have produced a revelation to spoil the spell cast by Schindler’s List’s eternal wail of unending Jewish victimhood? Were drugs involved? Was record executive, rave promoter, and Ron Goldman acquaintance Brett Cantor’s very similar murder by butchery in 1993 a mere coincidence? Was Fuhrman an ardent Hitlerite or was he merely protecting the interests of someone more powerful than Simpson? It is interesting to note that Fuhrman, excoriated for using the word “nigger” and then lying about it under oath, has, unlike the similarly tainted but comparatively innocuous celebrities Paula Deen and Michael Richards, been rewarded with fame, book deals, and frequent “forensic and crime scene expert” guest appearances on Fox News. Has Fuhrman been rewarded for services rendered in his handling of the Simpson case?

Conspiracy researcher Alex Constantine is convinced of Simpson’s innocence and has this to say at his Anti-Fascist Research Bin site:

The Dragonfly nightclub in Los Angeles. It was owned at one time by Brett Cantor, a close friend of Nicole Brown-Simpson. Cantor died a year before her – in exactly the same manner …

This is the essential point the media universally ignore – there were a score of murders around Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman, and Simpson himself. Brett Cantor was one of them.

Simpson wasn’t responsible for murdering his ex-wife, though I will concede the proposition that he MAY have been an accessory – but then, so is the Mockingbird press.

I wrote about the decapitation of Cantor 12 years ago – and no one wanted to hear it. It got in the way of a simple verdict. Simpson had to be guilty, so all contradictory evidence was ignored or explained away. It’s “black and white.” Most Caucasian talk-show hosts agree.

“MAYBE there was EDTA [blood preservative] in the laundry detergent,” Marcia Clark informed Judge Ito in conference, referring to Simpson’s socks … it had to be explained … is this bit of idle speculation so? …

The LAPD lab FINALLY had “copious amounts of blood” on the socks AFTER TWO careful inspections found “no blood” at all, not a dribble … and ETDA, too …

“Maybe?” May be. May be. Or may not be.

Or maybe Simpson had EDTA in his blood when it was circulating through his veins. It wasn’t in the laundry detergent.

And how to explain the EDTA in the samples collected at the back gate and on the sidewalk – or did someone plant evidence?

Every item of evidence was fabricated, planted or otherwise contaminated. Who would do a thing like that? White LAPD officers? No, insists the conventional wisdom. Honorable men. […]

fuhrman

Brett Cantor is one reason why Simpson is innocent.

But no one seems to care much about his murder. It’s not high-profile, very unsexy – and it gets in the way of the clean black-and-white verdict. Simpson must be guilty because Larry Elder on the radio said so, and Fox News, and all the far-right pundits. Ignore Cantor.

And Simpson once had an argument with Nicole – merely the cocaine she was snorting in front of his children – with her boyfriends. What an unreasonable bastard. He yelled. It was on tape – but the knowing talk-show hosts censored the cocaine, stopped the recording before the word was uttered. They wanted him screaming at Nicole for no particular reason. That made him look REAL guilty. So the tape was redacted.

Radio talk-show hosts across the country declared Simpson guilty within 24 hours of his arrest. The judicial system is superfluous. Talk show hosts have made trial-by-jury unnecessary because they know best. That’s why they’re on the radio, telling us what to think.

It’s so difficult to say that Simpson did it if Brett’s corpse directs us elsewhere.

Cantor lost his head. The murder weapon – a knife – was identical to the one used in the Simpson case.

The wounds were identical to Nicole’s (she was also nearly decapitated).

Presumably, Simpson gets around. Driven by jealousy, he murdered his ex, her boyfriend, Brett Cantor and a few Mezzaluna waiters, even tried to blow one up with a bomb planted in the waiter’s car. Simpson is everywhere, killing his bud Butch Sucharski, killing his wife and her beau and a few waiters at the Mezzaluna – for good measure, and to work off that jealous rage.

Let’s all ignore Cantor and a dozen other corpses and pretend that the gloves fit, cite that “mountain” of blood evidence – despite the presence of chemical PRESERVATIVE in the blood samples BEFORE they were collected – because … because that’s how we prefer to look at the world – as the media tell us to see it.

We are good little nazis with proper programming.

Does posting this make me a bad Nazi?

Rainer Chlodwig von K.

Advertisements

About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

16 comments on “O.J. Simpson’s Ordeal in the Court of Public Opinion: Was It a Bloody Bundy Drive-By?

  1. icareviews
    October 15, 2016

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      October 15, 2016

      I’ll have to study this provocative thesis later, but I recall considering his gratuitous performance in a Ruby Wax interview (5:35) as damning.

      Like

      • bob saffron
        October 15, 2016

        Again, before delving into the merits of the case for innocence, why wouldn’t OJ be vilified by the media? As in the stabbing of Yankel Rosenbaum, black lives matter relatively less than Jewish. If it were Nicole Simpson the media were upset about then I’ve misread the entire episode. Goldman was the “white” victim that mattered. Victims with identifiably Jewish names are going to get plenty of media and institutional support, even if it is in the guise of solidarity with whites.

        Like

  2. guest
    October 15, 2016

    Wait a minute, someone is actually named Fuhrman? That’s hitlarious!

    Like

    • icareviews
      October 15, 2016

      He’s supposedly even tied to white nationalist groups like the Order; but an interesting tidbit that emerges a few minutes into F. Lee Bailey’s cross-examination of Fuhrman is that the detective did undercover narc work as a military policeman in Vietnam:

      Like

  3. kerberos616
    October 15, 2016

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

  4. Sam J.
    October 15, 2016

    My first thought is that if Simpson didn’t do it then the (((Star Whackers))) did it to get Simpsons money.

    Like

  5. guest
    October 16, 2016

    Now i remember Porkins Policy Radio, the honcho from Spy Culture was their inaugural guest, i just listened to it last week, and it’s a site you’ll most certainly dig Rainer, that Spy Culture, “Intelligence Agencies and Popular Culture”, but I’m sure you already heard bout it, but just in case, and for everyone else…

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Hipster Racist
    October 17, 2016

    I remember the typical attitude was that OJ has killed his wife due to jealousy that she was fucking other men – no racial connotations at all. A typical “crime of passion” – the kind that men of all races do every day. The fact he staged the big “slow chase” in the white Bronco was seen as an admission of guilt.

    Then, the blacks started coming up with all sorts of racist conspiracy theories. I think a lot of people were red pilled when the media show the live reaction of the black college students at Brown – they all erupted into cheers of joy at the verdict.

    The woman prosecutor thought that stacking the jury with all women would mean “feminist solidarity” with a victim of domestic violence. LOL – only white women believe in a multi-racial sisterhood. The all black women jury was all like, “that white bitch got what she deserved, stealing a rich black man.” Etc.

    The whole incident really just showed that it didn’t matter how “not racist” white people were – white people loved OJ and didn’t mind him marrying a white woman – but when the stakes are down, blacks only see race. Only whites care about “anti-racism” and “colorblindness” and “judge people not by the color of their skin.”

    All other races are 100% racist, all the time, no apologies.

    Whether or not OJ really did it or if it was a drug hit, no idea. It was never really about OJ himself, it was about race.

    Like

  7. Pingback: O.J. Simpson’s Ordeal in the Court of Public Opinion: Was It a Bloody Bundy Drive-By? | Hipster Racist

  8. eyeslevel
    October 18, 2016

    Trump talks about rigging the election.

    The press denounces it, thereby widely publicizing it.

    Then this comes out:

    Like

    • eyeslevel
      October 18, 2016
      • Hipster Racist
        October 18, 2016

        We here at AryanSkynet were talking about staged events at Trump rallies months ago. As usual, we were ahead of the curve.

        Unfortunately, too many were cheering when a hapless Trump fan took the bait and acted out. The Clown Corral would cheer because people were “finally fighting back.” Whether you like it or not, the DNC was right – the violence made Trump fans look bad and played into the anti-white narrative.

        When will Whites get smart?

        Like

  9. bob saffron
    October 18, 2016

    Thanks for those podcasts. I had no idea of the larger picture behind the OJ incrimination. O/T: If you want another example where the media narrative is unstoppable and hides a sinister crime, look no further than then non-sinking of RMS Titanic.

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: