Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

O.J. Simpson’s Ordeal in the Court of Public Opinion: Was It a Bloody Bundy Drive-By?

oj

I was only twelve years old when the discovery of the mutilated bodies of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman initiated the media circus surrounding the grotesque “Trial of the Century” to determine whether or not Orenthal James Simpson had murdered his ex-wife and her friend outside her home on Bundy Drive in the Brentwood neighborhood of Los Angeles. Consequently, I took little interest and gleaned whatever I understood of the case from snippets of television and a general awareness of how “The Juice” was perceived by those around me. The certainty with which we all – we white Americans – accepted or even enthused at the thought of the guilt of the accused was such a natural matter of course that it never crossed my mind that Simpson might have been innocent of the charges – until this past week, that is, when, on a whim, I happened to listen to a series of podcasts addressing the twenty-first anniversary of the case and the lingering evidence of a frame-up perpetrated against the defendant.

redmond

Pearse Redmond

The intermittently frustrating and interesting Pearse Redmond, host of the Porkins Policy Review program, has, along with guests Brian Heiss and Stephen Singular – specifically, with episodes 47, 53, 61, and 62 – offered his listeners ample food for thought where the Simpson case is concerned. Singular, the author of Legacy of Deception: An Investigation of Mark Fuhrman and Racism in the L.A.P.D., has also written about the murder of Alan Berg and is keen to play up the possible “neo-Nazi” motivation for the framing of Simpson for the murders. Similarly, Heiss is an open promoter of “diversity” and clearly has an ideological stake in Simpson’s posited innocence. Redmond also annoys with his stubborn insistence on taking the street-clogging astroturf idiocy of the Black Lives Matter movement seriously. Notwithstanding the foregoing criticisms, however, I am encouraging those who read this to take the time to listen to the information and the arguments presented in Redmond’s retrospective series of podcasts and to judge the material on its merits and independently of any of the presenters’ advertised prejudices.

heiss

Brian Heiss

White nationalist wisdom, to the extent that such exists, indicates that Hebraic mainstream media spin elevates an imaginary black righteousness while vilifying the dispossessed majority – even to the absurd height of misrepresenting an episode of black thuggery during the Baltimore riots as some inebriated white woman’s attempted theft of an innocent black man’s purse. Hypothetically positing that the jury made the correct decision, was there any factor present in the Simpson case that would cause the mass of the media to override its habitual anti-white programming? Could it have been, for instance, that probing too deeply into the sordid life of Ron Goldman might have produced a revelation to spoil the spell cast by Schindler’s List’s eternal wail of unending Jewish victimhood? Were drugs involved? Was record executive, rave promoter, and Ron Goldman acquaintance Brett Cantor’s very similar murder by butchery in 1993 a mere coincidence? Was Fuhrman an ardent Hitlerite or was he merely protecting the interests of someone more powerful than Simpson? It is interesting to note that Fuhrman, excoriated for using the word “nigger” and then lying about it under oath, has, unlike the similarly tainted but comparatively innocuous celebrities Paula Deen and Michael Richards, been rewarded with fame, book deals, and frequent “forensic and crime scene expert” guest appearances on Fox News. Has Fuhrman been rewarded for services rendered in his handling of the Simpson case?

Conspiracy researcher Alex Constantine is convinced of Simpson’s innocence and has this to say at his Anti-Fascist Research Bin site:

The Dragonfly nightclub in Los Angeles. It was owned at one time by Brett Cantor, a close friend of Nicole Brown-Simpson. Cantor died a year before her – in exactly the same manner …

This is the essential point the media universally ignore – there were a score of murders around Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman, and Simpson himself. Brett Cantor was one of them.

Simpson wasn’t responsible for murdering his ex-wife, though I will concede the proposition that he MAY have been an accessory – but then, so is the Mockingbird press.

I wrote about the decapitation of Cantor 12 years ago – and no one wanted to hear it. It got in the way of a simple verdict. Simpson had to be guilty, so all contradictory evidence was ignored or explained away. It’s “black and white.” Most Caucasian talk-show hosts agree.

“MAYBE there was EDTA [blood preservative] in the laundry detergent,” Marcia Clark informed Judge Ito in conference, referring to Simpson’s socks … it had to be explained … is this bit of idle speculation so? …

The LAPD lab FINALLY had “copious amounts of blood” on the socks AFTER TWO careful inspections found “no blood” at all, not a dribble … and ETDA, too …

“Maybe?” May be. May be. Or may not be.

Or maybe Simpson had EDTA in his blood when it was circulating through his veins. It wasn’t in the laundry detergent.

And how to explain the EDTA in the samples collected at the back gate and on the sidewalk – or did someone plant evidence?

Every item of evidence was fabricated, planted or otherwise contaminated. Who would do a thing like that? White LAPD officers? No, insists the conventional wisdom. Honorable men. […]

fuhrman

Brett Cantor is one reason why Simpson is innocent.

But no one seems to care much about his murder. It’s not high-profile, very unsexy – and it gets in the way of the clean black-and-white verdict. Simpson must be guilty because Larry Elder on the radio said so, and Fox News, and all the far-right pundits. Ignore Cantor.

And Simpson once had an argument with Nicole – merely the cocaine she was snorting in front of his children – with her boyfriends. What an unreasonable bastard. He yelled. It was on tape – but the knowing talk-show hosts censored the cocaine, stopped the recording before the word was uttered. They wanted him screaming at Nicole for no particular reason. That made him look REAL guilty. So the tape was redacted.

Radio talk-show hosts across the country declared Simpson guilty within 24 hours of his arrest. The judicial system is superfluous. Talk show hosts have made trial-by-jury unnecessary because they know best. That’s why they’re on the radio, telling us what to think.

It’s so difficult to say that Simpson did it if Brett’s corpse directs us elsewhere.

Cantor lost his head. The murder weapon – a knife – was identical to the one used in the Simpson case.

The wounds were identical to Nicole’s (she was also nearly decapitated).

Presumably, Simpson gets around. Driven by jealousy, he murdered his ex, her boyfriend, Brett Cantor and a few Mezzaluna waiters, even tried to blow one up with a bomb planted in the waiter’s car. Simpson is everywhere, killing his bud Butch Sucharski, killing his wife and her beau and a few waiters at the Mezzaluna – for good measure, and to work off that jealous rage.

Let’s all ignore Cantor and a dozen other corpses and pretend that the gloves fit, cite that “mountain” of blood evidence – despite the presence of chemical PRESERVATIVE in the blood samples BEFORE they were collected – because … because that’s how we prefer to look at the world – as the media tell us to see it.

We are good little nazis with proper programming.

Does posting this make me a bad Nazi?

Rainer Chlodwig von K.

Advertisements

About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

73 comments on “O.J. Simpson’s Ordeal in the Court of Public Opinion: Was It a Bloody Bundy Drive-By?

  1. icareviews
    October 15, 2016

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

    • bob saffron
      October 15, 2016

      I’ll have to study this provocative thesis later, but I recall considering his gratuitous performance in a Ruby Wax interview (5:35) as damning.

      Like

      • bob saffron
        October 15, 2016

        Again, before delving into the merits of the case for innocence, why wouldn’t OJ be vilified by the media? As in the stabbing of Yankel Rosenbaum, black lives matter relatively less than Jewish. If it were Nicole Simpson the media were upset about then I’ve misread the entire episode. Goldman was the “white” victim that mattered. Victims with identifiably Jewish names are going to get plenty of media and institutional support, even if it is in the guise of solidarity with whites.

        Like

  2. guest
    October 15, 2016

    Wait a minute, someone is actually named Fuhrman? That’s hitlarious!

    Like

    • icareviews
      October 15, 2016

      He’s supposedly even tied to white nationalist groups like the Order; but an interesting tidbit that emerges a few minutes into F. Lee Bailey’s cross-examination of Fuhrman is that the detective did undercover narc work as a military policeman in Vietnam:

      Like

  3. kerberos616
    October 15, 2016

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

  4. Sam J.
    October 15, 2016

    My first thought is that if Simpson didn’t do it then the (((Star Whackers))) did it to get Simpsons money.

    Like

  5. guest
    October 16, 2016

    Now i remember Porkins Policy Radio, the honcho from Spy Culture was their inaugural guest, i just listened to it last week, and it’s a site you’ll most certainly dig Rainer, that Spy Culture, “Intelligence Agencies and Popular Culture”, but I’m sure you already heard bout it, but just in case, and for everyone else…

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Hipster Racist
    October 17, 2016

    I remember the typical attitude was that OJ has killed his wife due to jealousy that she was fucking other men – no racial connotations at all. A typical “crime of passion” – the kind that men of all races do every day. The fact he staged the big “slow chase” in the white Bronco was seen as an admission of guilt.

    Then, the blacks started coming up with all sorts of racist conspiracy theories. I think a lot of people were red pilled when the media show the live reaction of the black college students at Brown – they all erupted into cheers of joy at the verdict.

    The woman prosecutor thought that stacking the jury with all women would mean “feminist solidarity” with a victim of domestic violence. LOL – only white women believe in a multi-racial sisterhood. The all black women jury was all like, “that white bitch got what she deserved, stealing a rich black man.” Etc.

    The whole incident really just showed that it didn’t matter how “not racist” white people were – white people loved OJ and didn’t mind him marrying a white woman – but when the stakes are down, blacks only see race. Only whites care about “anti-racism” and “colorblindness” and “judge people not by the color of their skin.”

    All other races are 100% racist, all the time, no apologies.

    Whether or not OJ really did it or if it was a drug hit, no idea. It was never really about OJ himself, it was about race.

    Like

  7. Pingback: O.J. Simpson’s Ordeal in the Court of Public Opinion: Was It a Bloody Bundy Drive-By? | Hipster Racist

  8. eyeslevel
    October 18, 2016

    Trump talks about rigging the election.

    The press denounces it, thereby widely publicizing it.

    Then this comes out:

    Like

    • eyeslevel
      October 18, 2016
      • Hipster Racist
        October 18, 2016

        We here at AryanSkynet were talking about staged events at Trump rallies months ago. As usual, we were ahead of the curve.

        Unfortunately, too many were cheering when a hapless Trump fan took the bait and acted out. The Clown Corral would cheer because people were “finally fighting back.” Whether you like it or not, the DNC was right – the violence made Trump fans look bad and played into the anti-white narrative.

        When will Whites get smart?

        Like

  9. bob saffron
    October 18, 2016

    Thanks for those podcasts. I had no idea of the larger picture behind the OJ incrimination. O/T: If you want another example where the media narrative is unstoppable and hides a sinister crime, look no further than then non-sinking of RMS Titanic.

    Like

  10. MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
    March 29, 2017

    No, Rainer Chlodwig von K., as a black man I don’t think your posting of this makes you a “bad nazi” at all. Whatever moral indignation you may have had I believe kicked in to examine what you saw as a potential flaw in this on-going diatribe of recklessness, and intentional unprofessional conduct by sworn officers of the court to frame a man. This immoral conduct of “crossing the line” is what applies here presumably if one even believes in the adage of “Honor amongst thieves”, what was done here was dangerous to all in this nation and went too far. What was done in the Simpson case including suppression of evidence, official concealment, aiding and abetting the removal of exculpatory evidence from the exhibit department Simpson case file BA-097211 are all things that could be used to frame any man, including white ones like you. That’s what I believe, and though I don’t know you to determine whether I have any affection for you at all I do respect you attempting to point this clandestine activity out. By mid-July 1994 barely a month after the murders took place police officers in the West Side Division of the LAPD were reporting to the complaints officer within the LADA’s office of Fuhrman’s neo-nazi activities within the precinct and his corrupt nature of planting evidence. An internal affairs investigation was advised by the complaints officer but then sabotaged by those determined to point the finger at Simpson. By the time of the trial the narrative subsequently embraced and forced fed to the herd within the public forum was offered presumably by a WASP, the late Dominick Dunne, in Vanity Fair in early 1995. He wrote about experiencing an epiphany while attending an operatic performance of the Shakespearean tragedy Othello. Othello is Shakespeares usurped 15th-century Italian story “The Moor of Venice” where a celebrated Moorish (Black) General of the Mediterranean became so fanatically infatuated with a white woman that out of enraged jealousy he subsequently stalked and killed her. Rolled forward 400 years this became the off-the-rack cheap suit placed on OJ Simpson and promulgated by Ashkenazim within the LADA’s office who concealed exculpatory evidence and deposited phony evidence with other Ashkenazim in the powerful media to exponentially expand the fraud. This motley crew was a strange alliance it appears of neo-nazi sympathizers within the LAPD higher command and perfidious Ashkenazim within the LADA’s office whose reckless activities are worthy of recognition as any of those betrayers in Ben Hecht’s PERFIDY who conspired with the nazi commanders in Hungary to betray their Hungarian brethern by tricking them onto trains headed to the death camps of Aushwitz and Buchenwald. What was achieved in the Simpson case certainly was pecuniary gain since several people made millions off the on-going fraudlent Simpson propaganda and networks on the threshold of bankruptcy saved. However, more importantly, was the retaking by whites, both WASP and Ashkenazim, of the perceived moral high ground in LA and probably the US which was threatened and potentially lost after the global viewing of the Rodney King electrification and savage beating by multiple LAPD officers in 1991. Their subsequent acquittal in a Simi Valley, CA courtroom in 1992 leading to broad civil insurrection across LA interrupting air traffic into LAX was I believe a major factor in this clandestine decision to retake the moral high ground as well. Turning Simpson, one of the white folks supreme favorite Negroes, into the fanatical 20th century Othello is believed to have succeeded in accomplishing that while redirecting attention from other serious areas of malfeasance associated with LA’s sworn officers of the court. Was this level of seditious conduct worth it that threatened to destroy the fundamental protective guarantees of this Republic? Those myopic thinkers will undoubtedly say yes since myopia has no color boundaries, but only time will tell. —-Maddoggbrown

    Like

    • icareviews
      March 29, 2017

      The “neo-Nazi” leanings of Fuhrman, if those are his genuine sympathies, seem like a pretty weak motivation for his actions to me. As you indicate, Jewish media were fully complicit in conveying a seeming consensus on Simpson’s guilt. Michael Collins Piper wondered aloud on one of his podcasts if Fuhrman hadn’t rendered some COINTELPRO-type services for the ADL? The “neo-Nazi” and KKK-style movements are notoriously rife with government plants and Jewish hoaxery. Furhrman may very well dislike blacks on a gut level, as many police officers no doubt do; but it also wouldn’t surprise me if some of those white nationalist connections of his had suspicious McVeigh-ish agendas. (Jews, by the way, aren’t “white”, and honest ones will admit as much. The Ashkenazim tend to have an approximate average of 50% European DNA.)

      As far as Buchenwald, not even mainstream historians maintain any longer that any of the camps within German borders were extermination facilities. They do, however, continue to maintain that Auschwitz was such a place in spite of the fact that no forensic evidence has ever supported that assertion. Here are one Jewish researcher’s findings on the subject:

      Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        March 29, 2017

        I made no suggestions of Fuhrman’s engagement in malfeasance having anything to do with his neo-nazi leanings. He was, it appears, simply a corrupt individual no more, no less. I’m sure that neo-nazis must have some standard of integrity that they would expect even among their own; however, based upon the testimony of multiple witnesses regarding their engagements with Fuhrman he has little. His prior misconduct protected by higher command officers that the three LAPD officers from different precincts came forward to the DA’s office a month after the murders to report. They spoke of his braggadocious allegations of intimate knowledge of the nice “boob” job of Simpson’s ex-wife, Nicole, implying a closer relationship than Fuhrman wants to admit. The breast enhancement was subsequently confirmed by the autopsy report,

        Fuhrman lies even when he doesn’t need to lie which is clear in his testimony, (1.) about when he first saw the glove at Bundy, first he reported it was around 7:15 AM or an hour and a half after sunrise which was 5:41 AM but the LAPD photographer Rokhar under cross-examination shot that down by revealing that it was approximately 4:15 AM when that photo was taken or an hour and a half before sunrise. (2.) He lies further about when he first saw the glove by stating under cross -examination that he first saw the glove when he took another officer outside the gate to the northside of the Bundy property fence and while looking through he states in the plural that he saw “them” lying at Goldman’s feet. He seems to suffer from temporary amnesia since he noted initially that once he arrived at around 2:10 AM it was the initial officer Riske who arrived at the scene at 12:30 AM and secured the property that showed the glove to him on a walk through. Even the African American female jurors said in their book, MADAM FOREMAN, that they thought it was funny that Fuhrman would lie about something as trivial as the use of the word Nigger when they could understand that the stress of the job in the areas he was working may have caused him to use the word, but he feels he can mask a lie with his Hollywood good looks and authoritative persona and not get caught. That’s what made him dangerous to anyone. Those are just a few instances of his lack of veracity.

        Upon reading his book “Murder In Brentwood” one can see that Fuhrman has real psychological problems. His real intent in framing Simpson, in my opinion, appears to be related to his narcissistic attitude, and arrogant determination not to be denied recognition as a crack detective once again when his West Side Division supervisor, Phillips, tells him around 2:45 AM that he would no longer be lead detective on the case but an assistant to the glory boys from Robbery Homicide who were not due on scene for another hour and a half. In his book he denigrates with few limitations virtually every department within the LAPD for incompetence but pays special attention to his superior officer, Det. Phil Vannatter, by repeatedly using derogatory descriptions of Vannatter’s unprofessional decisions, including leaving one crime site and going to another, and thus contaminating both sites albeit allegedly being Fuhrman who encouraged them to go. This time, his second visit, that evening according to Stephen Singular’s LEGACY OF DECEPTION

        Vannatter it appears played Fuhrman for a patsy once he returned to the main house to tell them he’d found a glove on the side of the house near the guest quarters of Kato Kaelin. Vannatter wasn’t stupid, he knew the distance to the street on Rockingham where the Bronco was parked was at least 160 feet away but as Fuhrman states in his book and testimony there was no blood trail for that distance of half an NFL playing field back to the front gate. So their theory is Simpson with adrenalin pumping and bleeding walked along the fence line 160 feet and climbed the fence and pounded on the wall outside Katos room. Then traveled 160 feet back to the front Rockingham gate to deposit the 8 drops of alleged blood found. How does one do that without dripping blood? Vannatter played him to use him, in my opinion, because according to Joseph Bosco’s book A PROBLEM OF EVIDENCE he circumvented the protocol of calling an emergency hotline for the deputy DA on duty when one is, rarely, needed at a crime site. Instead, he called the personal residence that morning of one of his socializing smoke and drinking buddies, Marcia Clark. Allegedly because of her being associated with the crime the longest DA Garcetti is alleged to have assigned her to the case but initially under Deputy Bill Hodgman. Hodgman would come down with a mysterious heart palpation that would elevate Clark to lead prosecutor. However, Hodgman acting as watchdog to this malfeasance would be the one to go behind closed doors to seek an ex parte court order to remove all evidence from the Simpson case file, including what we believe to be those exculpatory phone records of Juditha Brown that Clark, Shapiro, Ito, and Cochran would avoid showing to the jury by entering via stipulation. The same action occurred in the Civil trial as well.

        I apologize for the Buchenwald mistake since I was simply reaching quickly for names of camps that I thought were mentioned in the Kastner trial in 1952 Palestine/Israel. Kastner was the main subject highlighted in the betrayal of Jews loaded onto Nazi trains in Hungary and not for a land of milk and honey as they’d been promised but for the German-controlled death camps. The activity of Marcia Clark and all was equally a perfidious and reckless act as that of Kastner in 1944, in the sordid alliance between Ashkenazim and neo-nazis in Los Angeles to promulgate this false narrative that has led to the denigration of African Americans and the destruction of an American sports icon, OJ Simpson.

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        March 29, 2017

        -“””The “neo-Nazi” leanings of Fuhrman, if those are his genuine sympathies, seem like a pretty weak motivation for his actions to me”””.

        I never cited personal what his motivations were. Fuhrman, in my opinion, was motivated to frame Simpson by those same things in human nature that drove others involved, like Marcia Clark. His being a nazi, parading around the precinct in Nazi paraphernalia and planting swastikas in lockers was pointed out by a white police officer that Fuhrman allegedly denigrated for becoming engaged to a Jewish woman. Clark’s appears to be pecuniary gain trying to get away from the drudgery of a bad job and a second bad marriage. Fuhrman’s problem appeared to be the lack of professional acclaim which he was missing while being stalled as a junior detective from from advancing to being an elite detective in Robbery Homicide. He exposes his disenchantment with this and his disdain for the incompetence of much of the LAPD departments and harboring special disdain for senior Robbery Homicide Detective Vannatter. Thus, unbeknownst to Fuhrman he became the perfect vessel and patsy for Vannatter who he seems to despise in his book “Murder in Brentwood.

        Fuhrman understood the potential of this being a celebrity trial when it was revealed who the female victim was, and he was not going to accept demotion again when his Supervisor Phillips told him he was off the case as lead detective, in my opinion. Vannatter and Clark had been close, socializing/drinking buddies. Thus, Vannatter had his case to satisfy Clark’s desire to achieve pecuniary gain and bail out of the DA’s office and had his patsy, Mark Fuhrman in case things went sideways.

        Vannatter was smart enough to recognize that Fuhrman was a fool when he brought them around to the side of Simpson’s house to show him a glove which Simpson allegedly threw down on his own property. The subsequent problem that the glove was at least 160 feet from the Bronco on Rockingham and 150 feet from the 8 drops of blood allegedly found at the Rockingham gate but yet there was no blood trail. How do you travel by foot the distance of an NFL football field on both sides of the separating fence and not deposit any blood. At least that was the testimony of Fuhrman, no blood trail leading away from the glove.

        The significance of the neo-nazi/Ashkenazic alliance in LA was the perfidious nature of the betrayal similar to that in which they engaged in 1944 while selling out the Jews of Hungary by encouraaging them to board the nazi death trains through trickery. In 1994 they did the same thing once again to the African Americans in America by passing fraudulent information from the dirty hands of Clark, to Geraldo, Chuck Grodin(sky), Barbara Walters and Katie Couric. And it still continues for pecuniary gain. Fuhrman was the beard and no more in case they needed a diversion which he intentionally or inadvertently provided. The play was to regain the moral high ground as stated before in the wake of the brutal unprofessional conduct against rodney King caught on tape that besmirched the well-cultivated 50-year-old persona of William Parker’s LAPD.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        August 12, 2017

        The Auschwitz swimming pool.

        Maybe the Jews will force the Palestinians to repair the pool.

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 13, 2017

        Don’t believe I assigned Fuhrman’s neo-Nazi leanings to his motivations, I stated previously here or somewhere else, that Fuhrman’s motivations upon reading his book MURDER IN BRENTWOOD appear to be driven by a narcissistic personality disorder, and an extreme heightened sense of self-importance that contributed to his feelings that he’d been unjustly denied recognition as a crack detective due to lack of promotion. His neo-Nazi leanings simply appeared to be supplemental but potentially exacerbated his feelings of grandeur, and perceived superiority to comfortably lie and be believed about people he felt were inferior to him, in particular women and minorities.

        Thus when informed within a half-hour after his arrival at the murder site around 02:45 AM by his superior Det. Philips that their Westside Division detectives would now be playing second fiddle to the elite Robbery Homicide detectives from central headquarters downtown is when it appears that Fuhrman made the decision to place himself in the middle of the case as an indispensable factor in what he opined upon Robbery/homicide being assigned the case would be potentially a high profile celebrity trial. Thus, when the investigation and bodies lay there for the next hour and a half with nothing being done waiting for robbery-homicide detectives Vannatter and Lange to arrive, that’s when it appears Fuhrman was hatching his plan to be as he later stated ” the key” individual in the prosecution’s case.

        If you read Fuhrman’s testimony he conveniently lies about what appear to be insignificant things that prove to be crucial More important than the inexplicable lies told about the racial epitaphs was the fact that he lied about the time in which he had the police photographer Rolf Rokahr take the important and famous photo of him at the Bundy murder site pointing at the matching glove to the crucial piece of evidence that ties Simpson to the murders, the glove he found on Simpson’s property.

        He testified that he was ordered to return to the Bundy murder site around 7AM by lead Detective Phil Vannatter after showing him the glove he’d found at Simpson’s residence and take a picture of the glove and determine whether it was a match to the one he had found around 6:00 AM on the back side of Simpson’s house.
        He stated that the photo of him pointing at the glove was taken when he hailed the police photographer at around 7:10-7:30 AM or approximately an hour and a half after sunrise to take that photo.

        However, months, after Fuhrman had been impeached and dismissed as a prosecution witness for lying about his use of the racial epitaphs the LAPD photographer Rolf Rokahr, took the witness stand under cross examination. Rokahr under oath testified that the famous photograph of Fuhrman was taken in complete darkness between 4:15 and 4:40 AM which was about two and a half hours earlier than Fuhrman claimed and about one and a half hours before sunrise which was at 5:41 AM on June 13, 1994. Thus, it raises further suspicion of Fuhrman’s credibilty as a result of an apparent inability to tell the difference between darkness and daylight regarding a crucial event in this important case.

        Furthermore, it goes to Fuhrman’s credibility regarding the crucial evidence of the glove he alllegedly found on Simpson’s property because that photo of the most important piece of evidence tying Simpson to the murders Fuhrman hailed Rokhar to take almost a half hour before the detectives decided to go to Simpson’s house. Going there according to Detective Vannatter’s testimony and contradictory to Furman’s was encouraged by Fuhrman.

        In his book MURDER IN BRENTWOOD, Fuhrman demeans virtually anyone and everyone, and every department of the LAPD as being incompetent. He actually uses such negative epitaphs to criticize the lead detective Vannatter for violating the first principle of detective work of not leaving one crime site and going to another, as they left Nicole Brown Simpson’s Bundy residence and proceeded to go to and contaminate the second crime site of Simpson’s Rockingham. The Scotland Yard veteran detectives Merston & Harpur who evaluated the demented theories of William Dear in his book O.J. IS INNOCENT AND I CAN PROVE IT offered the same remarks about the LAPD detectives leaving one crime site to go to another. They stated they should have called in to central headquarters and asked them to send another detective detail to Simpson’s Rockingham to prevent contamination.

        However, much of the testimony implies that they were influenced in leaving the murder site to go Simpson’s Rockingham by Fuhrman, and that includes Furhman’s superior officer a Lieutenant who testified during the Simpson trial that Fuhrman asked permission to go with Dets. Lange and Vannatter to Simpson’s residence. If you accept what Stephen Singular the Denver based author has written in his 1995 chronicle LEGACY OF DECEPTION of what he was told by an inside member of the LAPD who came to Denver to speak with him about the malfeasance right after the murders in 1994, he told Singular that Fuhrman went to Simpson’s Rockingham residence twice during the darkness of night on the date that the bodies were discovered. According to the anonymous individual talking to Singular, Fuhrman and another officer went there because Fuhrman believed he’d find evidence of Simpson’s involvement, i.e. blood, etc. on his property. However, when they did not and got into an argument about leaving the first crime site. This was possibly the argument overheard by the next door maid, Rosa Lopez, around 3 AM.

        What made the anonymous person’s remarks plausible is that he told Singular of evidence that would be found along with the glove on Simpson’s property that Fuhrman used to handle and carry the glove the second time he went there around 5AM with Dets. Lange and Vannatter. This evidence by August 08, 1994 was unknown to the Defense team when Singular visited LA from Denver to talk with them. When they checked out his preposterous story they found that the police had actually attained such evidence of a blue plastic detective’s collection bag, and a broken piece of stick allegedly from the back of Nicole’s fence. The defense got the detectives to admit they’d found these unusual items that police previously stated looked out of place in the landscaped upscale community but to the anger of Singular, the defense attorney’s tepidly dealt with that evidence during the cross examination of LAPD detectives.

        Fuhrman would also lie as to when he first saw the first glove at the murder site on Bundy. He first stated that he was shown the glove by the first patrol officer, Riske, who arrived two hours before Fuhrman and secured the murder site with Fuhrman subsequently being given a walk-through. However, 7 months earlier during the preliminary hearing, Fuhrman stated the first time that he saw the glove is when he stepped outside of the murder site and went around to the fence on the north side of the scene to examine Ronald Goldman. It was at that time while examining the bodies from outside of that fence when Fuhrman claimed that he “saw them”, in reference to the glove(s),.lying at the foot of Ron Goldman. So, you can see that Fuhrman having neo-Nazi leanings as far as we are concerned at OMIG is not of major consequence since it doesn’t require you to be a neo_Nazi or neo-fascist to be a consummate liar. Anybody can be one of those regardless of race, creed, or color.

        Below you see Fuhrman pointing at the infamous glove.

        http://maddoggbuttkickingbrown.blog/2017/06/01/hollywood-flim-flam-how-blood-undermines-the-murder-case-against-oj-simpson-2/

        Below you’ll find the documentary revealing the malfeasance of these sworn officers of the court.

        Like

  11. Pingback: The Goldman Enigma | Aryan Skynet

  12. smartwhiteguy
    August 7, 2017

    That’s strange. I always though Goldman was totally gay.
    I think that was pushed by the media for some reason, that Ron G. was Nicole’s gay friend.

    Like

    • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
      August 7, 2017

      What do you think he (Ron Goldman) was?

      Like

      • smartwhiteguy
        August 7, 2017

        I thought he was Nicole’s gay friend.
        I recall a lot of people had that impression.

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 7, 2017

        There have been allegations of that before due to his association with a gay nightclub, the Dragonfly. However, there have also been allegations that he was a club promoter who uses his resources to draw patrons to particular clubs for a fee. Whether he was one or the other or a combination of both I can’t say. What I can say is that his record indicated that he did not hold any of the last 3 or 4 jobs beyond 6 months. The record will show that Ron Goldman still had an outstanding arrest warrant that had been issued and recalled three of four times before his death which it was recalled again for the 4th time on the 20th of June 1994 due to his being deceased. The record will show that we alleged at OMIG that one of our investigators had an opportunity of touching Ron’s estimated 6-inch criminal file that was too thick to fit through the customer service window in the Malibu Municipal Court Clerk’s Office. The record will show that when that investigator was buzzed into an open area to receive it he was denied access once the deputy clerk found inside that it had been stamped “CONFIDENTIAL” and that a judge must clear it to be publicly examined. The record will show that 4 said judges did not respond but passed it on to the Clerk Office manager, at Malibu Municipal Court, Ann Madden and she told T.H. Johnson of OMIG that Goldman’s file was exempt from disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act and whose confidentiality was protected by an exemption to that act under Sec. 6254(f) of the California Government Code, and that applicable section that appears to protect anyone who has been cooperating with law enforcement as a CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT. The record will show that OMIG investigators did not consider investigating the background of Ron Goldman until after interviewing residents adjacent to the Cheviot HIlls Tennis Court who told them that they had reported Goldman to park managers for selling drugs openly in the Cheviot Hills Tennis Court parking lot. We note that the record will show but does not confirm that Fred Goldman was asked during the deposition of whether Ron’s indebtedness causing his to file for bankruptcy was related to his criminal charges of falsely utilizing some unknown person’s credit card. The record will show that the wound Ron sustained to his right flank that went up and through the right rib cage and punctured the bottom of his aortic valve causing internal bleeding was in all probability delivered by a left handed assailant wielding a single edge knife in his left hand. Above is what the actual records show.

        Like

      • smartwhiteguy
        August 7, 2017

        Yes, I remember all that from the videos.
        As far as him being kweer I don’t think he acted overly gay in the dating game video, but since he’s jewish you never know. If not homosexual likely some other kind of rank perversion.

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 7, 2017

        Whether he was gay or wasn’t he’s dead. We’re more concerned about the malfeasance of sworn officers of the court who decided that they should manipulate evidence and information, including that related to Ron Goldman and the Goldman family, in order to destroy a black American icon created by Madison Ave, to sell cereal and other b.s. to white folks named OJ Simpson

        The significance of Goldman possibly being gay is related to the Illinois gangster and drug kingpin, attempted murderer, psychotic contract hiring head buster, Marvin Glass who died of HIV/AIDS three years after Goldman was killed. It appears that the gay element may come into play with a Glen Rogers whose method of choice always seemed to be throat slashing to go along with his stabbings. A Glen Rogers testified as a government witness in the case of a suburban Chicago brutal stabbing involving a sadomasochistic homosexual, who was stabbed and slashed to death and buried in a Satanic ritual across the border in Wisconsin.

        Then we have a fellow named Meoli stating in the documentary MY BROTHER THE SERIAL KILLER how Glen Rogers now awaiting execution on Florida’s death row for stabbing and slashing as many as 6 women to death in 4 weeks about Rogers fascination with the occult and devil worship, as does Joyce Spizer’s book CROSS COUNTRY KILLER about Rogers.

        Thus, there appears to be an outside chance of a connection with a malignant narcissist, Marvin Glass, and a medically psychotic serial killer, Glen Rogers, who appeared to have coincidental engagements with homosexual sadomasochists in Illinois, and who may have had similar connections with gays, and Ron Goldman, in Los Angeles including those at the DragonFly whose owner Brett Cantor was almost decapitated like Nicole Brown Simpson. Rogers stated ub a letter to OMIG investigators in 2000 that he knew those people in close proximity to Nicole and may have acted at the behest of Marvin Glass, who was in LA at the time when Ron Goldman was killed according to Fred Goldman in his book HIS NAME IS RON.

        Marvin may have had Ron killed to send a message to the elder Goldman, Fred, for taking something that a malignant narcissist considered valuable to him, his family, just 7 months after entering a federal prison associated with his drug kingpin activities. He also may have had him killed to punish Fred for beating on his sons while he was locked up in federal prison and unable to address the situation when according to Glass’s elder son, his children would give a report during visitations at his federal institution of Fred’s mistreatment.

        It may also have some additional association with the control of illicit drug money controlled by who the Chicago Sun Times Newspaper identified in a 1985 article as Marvin Glass’s mother-in-law, Elaine Goldman when he broke into her safe deposit box in a Chicago suburb. Elaine Goldman just happens to be a woman has the same name on search documents as Fred Goldman’s alleged mother, Elaine Goldman. Unless it is a coincidence or the search site has the wrong person it appears that Fred may be married to his own sister. Since Glass knew that his life was terminal due to AIDS why not punish Fred for the rest of life too for his trespasses against Marvin Glass.

        Fred has simply gone along with the show promulgated by the clandestine powers of LA, via DA Gil Garcetti, his flunky Marcia Clark, and her probable outside paramour Det. Phil Vannatter, to finger Simpson. Vannatter it appeared was willing to allow a jealous disrespectful envious fool, Mark Fuhrman, who admits as much in his book MURDER IN BRENTWOOD to be on the front end in the event his glove planting activity blew up in everyone’s faces and they needed a fall guy. That’s about how it ended up anyway.

        Liked by 1 person

      • smartwhiteguy
        August 8, 2017

        Utterly fascinating!
        Do go on!

        Like

    • icareviews
      August 9, 2017

      I thought O.J. was supposed to be a jealous Othello figure.

      Liked by 1 person

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 9, 2017

        A convenient palatable fallacy to lull gullible white folk to sleep particularly in the press/media where they’ve done no due diligence to reconcile the contradictions in evidence that was alleged during Simpson’s trial yet none of them bothered to re-examine.

        Like

      • smartwhiteguy
        August 10, 2017

        All that cocaine tends to make one edgy.

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 10, 2017

        I suppose edginess could be a factor but whose? Was it Nicole feeling a pseudo powerful edge hyped up on cocaine? It has been hidden but several people have told OMIG investigators that she was a user. Was it Ron Goldman hyped up on the fresh money he was allegedly now making selling cocaine in the Cheviot Hills Tennis Court Parking lot? Could be possibly OJ hyped up on cocaine that he could afford as a luxury purchased allegedly from William Wasz, or that he and Kardashian were making from cocaine profits sanitized by those money laundering fast food joints they owned? Or maybe it was the cocaine cartels hyped up because usurpers with a major cocaine connection via the Illinois Glass/Colombian/Goldman connection were now encroaching on their territory. Thus, there were many angles to analyze cocaine edginess but the LAPD lifted the crime scene tape on the day they discovered the bodies. They had their man for the sake of promulgating this false narrative, the late Dominick Dunne’s epiphany of the modern day Othello, OJ Simpson. Yet, one is still left with the hidden question, unless one is a narrow-minded myopic toad, as to who are these people?

        Like

      • smartwhiteguy
        August 10, 2017

        You should write a book.
        You’re wasted on the internet.

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 10, 2017

        OMIG INVESTIGATORS have written 4 books on the subject matter and produced one documentary which includes:
        1. PURSUIT OF EXHIBIT 35 In The OJ Simpson Murder Trial and its Hidden Secrets (2011)
        2. DOUBLE CROSSED FOR BLOOD (2000)
        3. THE PEOPLE VS. OJ SIMPSON (2013)
        4. CONSPIRACY OF ASSUMPTIONS (2014)
        and the documentary
        5. SERPENTS RISING: The OJ Simpson Conspiracy (2002)

        All OMIG operatives are compensated for their work whereby the principals have agreed from the beginning in 1996 to share the profits with the rest of staff. Hence, it’s “one for all and all for one” so I’m quite satisfied with whatever compensation comes my way and doing what our mandate has involved in the public relations department of OMIG. Me writing a book would simply be repetitive of what has already been written and what we go over in conference briefings when field investigators come in with their reports. I’m here to impart such information to you as are others in OMIG’s PR department.

        Liked by 2 people

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 10, 2017

        Meant to say, the internet has been our friend since 2000 since the tightly controlled broadcast media has frozen our repeated requests to respond to their dangerous assertions that impact the lives of people within our society. This is a case where literally no one has done any due diligence relative to the evidence, and simply granted court officers testifying the privilege of presumption even when there is a clash in what they are alleging to be the evidence. Thus, we’ve had to use the internet once it became popular around 1999 since our chairperson was first attacked by Geraldo Rivera in 1997 after serving an amicus request on the civil trial judge, Fugisaki. Dr. Johnson wanted to show the contradictions during that trial in the testimony of the substitute medical examiner, Dr. Lakshmanan, versus what the actual medical examiner, Dr. Golden, had placed in the autopsy reports. Dr. Johnson’s assertion was that the 4 deep stab wounds into the left side of Nicole’s neck with the sharp edge facing over her left shoulder was indicative of a left handed assailant attacking, while Ron Goldman was being simultaneously attacked by a right handed assailant. You can see the substitute doctor’s strange testimony right here https://youtu.be/LqSf8YCkw-I

        Liked by 1 person

  13. MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
    August 8, 2017

    Well, it certainly lends credibility to Joseph Bosco’s allegation in his book A PROBLEM OF EVIDENCE that the crime scene tape being pulled down at the crime site within 15 hours of when the bodies were discovered at 3:15 PM, because the LAPD was certain that they “had their man”, was simply premature. For our investigators at OMIG, after 21 years of investigation, it was beyond premature and contained more onerous acts of malfeasance with the hint of a Machiavellian plot.

    The racial undertones associated with bad actors who were sworn officers of the court whether it was intended or not it was used recklessly to upset the delicate balance of racial tranquility (if any at all) in America as OMIG investigator T.H. Johnson relates in his book “PURSUIT OF EXHIBIT 35 in the OJ Simpson Murder Trial and its Hidden Secrets”.

    The greater purpose beyond the peons of Marcia Clark, Gil Garcetti, and Deputy DA William Hodgman appears to be a clandestine intent to regain the moral high ground in the face of the world for America, and certainly for Los Angeles, lost in the aftermath of that embarrassing incident of inexplicable unprofessional police conduct in the gang-style beating of Rodney King. That visual incident captured on tape shamed America around the world, and drew further attention when civility was thrown into chaos with the widespread burning of L.A., with the federal troops in the street, and all sorts of chaos that stymied the economy of Los Angeles due to rioting associated with the Simi Valley Court acquittal of all of the police officers involved in the beating of King.

    The incidence of the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Lyle Goldman, appeared to be when Simpson’s number came up as the perfect candidate for this Machiavellian twist. He became the candidate of choice for deflection and allowing the subtle perception of white supremacy to be restored in America and especially Los Angeles with this 20-year fallacy of a Negro’s murderous infatuation with a white woman. To do so, however, meant the intentional and dangerous acts of undermining the Constitutional federally protect guarantees and protocols put in place to guarantee due process in the US common law courts to all citizens of this democratic republic. The basic protocols of which have been in place for 800 years since 1215 when King John was obligated under duress to sign the Magna Charta.
    One provision of the English Common Law, which is the basis of US, Canadian and Australian common law trial court systems, has remained in place and that is Clause 39 of the Magna Charta which assures that all evidence shall be subject to examination exclusively by “the triers of fact” consisting of a “jury of one’s peers”. That important provision did not exist prior to 1215 in the English courts of the King’s Bench.

    In the Simpson case, lawyers manipulated their way around that right with the judge, Lance Ito, admonishing the jury on February 07, 1995 and again on July 06, 1995 that they must accept a mutual agreement by lawyers entered by STIPULATION as fact derpiving them of examining the evidence. This occurred when the lawyers on both sides entered an unholy alliance to STIPULATE to fraudulent phone records by agreeing that the final time of the phone call between Nicole and Juditha was 09:37 PM. This represented a third time that the telephone record of that crucial call had changed and deprived the jury of examining what peripheral evidence indicates was exculpatory evidence favoring OJ Simpson’s innocence, the Juditha Brown Phone Records.

    Those records we believe would have supported the first statements, on at least 4 separate occasions) of Nicole’s mother and father, F. Lee Bailey, and Robert Shapiro, which were in line with the necessary travel time between Brentwood (L.A.) and Dana Point, Orange County that the last call to Nicole by Juditha Brown was at approximately 11PM. That time of 11PM was in line with what Dets. Lange and Vannatter stated on page 28 of their book, EVIDENCE DISMISSED that the Brown family lived “a minimum of 90 minutes south of Brenwood”. Thus, departing the Brentwood restaurant at approximately 08:45 PM raises critical questions regarding the veracity of a stipulation that the time of that final phone call was placed at 09:37 PM upon Juditha Brown arriving home at Dana Point.

    If so, and Nicole was alive on the phone at that time of 11PM, then OJ Simpson was climbing into the backseat of a chauffeured limousine at 11PM to catch an 11:45 PM flight to Chicago at LAX international airport.

    Like

    • Chang
      August 10, 2017

      MaddDoggButtlickingBrown, you are a tedious orangutan.
      No one bothers reading your pretentious walls of text.
      Do you think proving OJ’s innocence will exonerate the entire black race of all it’s countless heinous crimes?
      I’m sure OJ is very happy you are in his corner.
      Get a life.

      Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 10, 2017

        I’m simply here doing my job which I volunteered to do for OMIG several years ago and that is to help to develop any and all public relations vehicles no matter how insignificant they may be considered to be. It’s done to educate individuals not aware of anything other than what they have been force fed which is a false narrative. I’m also here to educate those interest of the dangers of poisoning the main stream of discourse within our society while concealing crucial evidence, even to ignorant ass racist neanderthal mofos like you. Other blacks, unlike myself, would say they wouldn’t piss on a stupid racist mofo like you if you were on fire; however, we’re different at OMIG. If we saw even a worthless, nothing-ass, ignorant SOB like you being unjustly misused and abused and we came by evidence like that in the Simpson case that was presented clandestinely to this organization 21 years ago, we would still stand up even for you. Even as probably a worthless racist POS you undoubtedly are, I would at least piss on you first to put the fire out so that we could hold your ignorant dumb ass up and tell the world that authorities have unjustly condemned the wrong individual.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        August 10, 2017

        As the principal contributor of articles to this website, I’d like to say that I appreciate the work of OMIG and of all organizations legitimately dedicated to uncovering the truth, no matter from what political perspective. I don’t happen to share T.H. Johnson’s ultimate interpretation of the purpose of the conspiracy as he discussed it with Mr. Opperman; but I do believe that all of this deserves more scrutiny than it has received. I’m a racial identitarian in that I’d prefer to see Europeans uniting politically and ensuring a safe future for their posterity rather than self-immolating on the altar of open-borders pathological altruism and lending themselves to exploitation and neoconservative war projects; but my preference for my own in no way means that I want to see an innocent man go down as one of the twentieth century’s most infamous murderers. The O.J. Simpson case, moreover, is unique in a number of ways and interesting both as a mass psychodrama and as a study in highly effective media obfuscation. I also happen to think that the Jewish involvement in this case is highly intriguing and instructive, which is why I thought my readers might be willing to look into the revisionist research.

        Liked by 2 people

      • smartwhiteguy
        August 10, 2017

        Agreed. I’m primarily interested in how our good friends, the you know who, manipulate the facts via their media to distort the truth and promote whatever delusion they wish to foster.
        However, the thing about Simpson is he wasn’t exactly a bastion of morality and clean living. When you live a sleazy lifestyle you are bound to make some serious enemies. There are way too many true injustices in the world for me to worry too much about Simpson. OJ may have got the shaft but compared to lots of other more horrific things that have happened to genuinely good people, what happened to him isn’t quite the tragedy some people make it out to be, so it’s hard for me to get overly excited about it.
        I’m sure even the most myopic of toads would agree.

        Like

      • icareviews
        August 10, 2017

        I get where you’re coming from. I just happen to have a tendency to gravitate toward some of these more obscure avenues of research. I’m interested in the stuff that doesn’t interest other people.

        Liked by 1 person

      • smartwhiteguy
        August 10, 2017

        Dare to be different!

        Liked by 1 person

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 10, 2017

        Since you disagree with Johnson’s interpretation of the conspiracy, and which interpretation is that you speak, I’m curious to know what is your own interpretation?

        BTW, Johnson told us that he’d rather avoid giving a subjective opinion as to motive since it has been used to impede true investigators from reconciling the plethora of irregularities that exist in the alleged evidence floated to down Simpson. I generally agree with his private side that nothing, including people, evidence or information should be granted the privilege of presumption. That all evidence that is in conflict must come to the table and it must be able to stand on its own merits. In the Simpson trial not only were stipulations entered instead of evidence to circumvent jury examination but all of the evidence was removed surreptitiously by one of the Simpson lead prosecutors with an ex parte motion and order received on the same day, April 24, 1998 to permanently remove all of the evidence in the Simpson case file. So much for historical review.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        August 11, 2017

        As I recall, Johnson tells Opperman that he sees this, at some level, as a pendulum-like action, correcting an imbalance to white-black animus after the Rodney King episode. After the LAPD had been tarnished by that affair and the ensuing rioting, if I’m understanding Johnson’s interpretation, the city officials and perhaps officialdom at a higher level had an interest in getting back at blacks, and Simpson furnished them with their opportunity.

        I’m reluctant to embrace such a reading because of my understanding of Jewish domination in the media. Mainstream media narratives, which are designed to manipulate blacks and whites alike, tend to, on the one hand, endorse irresponsible, thuggish behaviors and lifestyles among young blacks, while at the same time shaming whites for responding defensively to black criminal activity. The Michael Brown case would be an example of this. Brown was a violent buffoon and not a particularly flattering representative for blacks, and yet the mainstream media went out of its way, as with the similar case of Trayvon Martin, to present the world with an innocent “gentle giant”. In the case of the Baltimore rioting, there was even a photograph of a black man trying to yank a white woman’s purse away that was misrepresented by some Jewish journalists as a case of a white woman attacking a black man and trying to steal his (!) purse. In the case of George Zimmerman, the media even invented a “white” ethnicity for the obviously non-white character they wanted to vilify. Jews are constantly trying to make whites look bad vis-a-vis non-whites and trying to get blacks incensed against whites – hence, the constant stream of incendiary Jewish-produced movies like 12 Years a Slave, Django Unchained, The Birth of a Nation, and so forth.

        In view of all of this, the Simpson case is a real anomaly, as it’s an instance of the same media establishment making a special effort to take a prestigious black celebrity and sports hero and warp the public’s perception of him out of all proportion in favor of a rather sleazy set of victims, whose strange connections are conversely downplayed. The Jewish involvement is, I believe, key here and would seem to demonstrate that, while Jews ordinarily seek to fill whites with self-destructive guilt and pathological ideas about themselves and their culture, these same Jews are just as willing to throw blacks or other minorities under the bus when their own reputation is threatened.

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 11, 2017

        I think your last sentence is key here, ” throw them under the bus” particularly when it impacts their own interests, in this case the shameful interests of the powerful Jewish propaganda machine, and a few Jews who sought and attained pecuniary gain while undermining the common law justice system with their acts of malfeasance. However, it was not exclusive only to them, as Stephen Singular points out in his book LEGACY OF DECEPTION and LA Deputy DA Lucianne Coleman pointed out in her deposition, members of the LAPD had approached both of them on separate occasions to allege that there were neo-Nazi sympathizers in higher command positions within the LAPD that were protecting corrupt, racist, police officers like Mark Fuhrman. One officer claimed that he did not put it past Fuhrman to plant that glove on Simpson’s property since he believed it was Fuhrman who planted swastikas within his locker due to his disenchantment with the detective’s choice in a Jewish fiance. The other LAPD officer was in Denver shortly thereafter and in fact telling the author Singular of when Fuhrman planted the glove, and what he used to handle it which would be found on Simpson’s Rockingham property as evidence. Acknowledgment of those things came out during cross examination and direct examination but most observers missed its significance, as I did until reading Singular’s book. However, his Jewish publisher, Michael Viner attempted to sabotage his book and refused to allow Dove books to publish it because he thought and wanted Simpson to be found guilty. When the book came out a year later and three months after the Simpson trial in December of 1995, Viner did nothing to promote the book LEGACY. Johnson, as I remember in a conversation with our section of OMIG believed that it was a set of interests but one in particular whose importance held dominion over all others. In essence, an unholy alliance of strange bedfellows was created, since all could agree that the psychic impact of the events in the wake of the Rodney King incident, and the inexplicably unprofessional brutalization undermined the moral credibility of the white power structure in LA and the US around the world.

        The distorted fallacy of Simpson’s alleged popularity with blacks was false. By the time of the murders, Simpson was an old flavor, since other stars had come and gone since Simpson’s heyday, i.e. Walter Peyton, Franco Harris, Eric Dickerson, etc.. That was simply a ruse, a canard, by the prosecution’s Clark, Hodgeman, and Garcetti to conceal the malfeasance engaged in by Jews who passed on fraudulent information to other Jews in the national media. The actions of Jews, particularly of Marcia (Kleks) Clark had impeded an internal affairs neo-Nazi investigation within the LAPD in July 1994 so as not to tarnish their key witness Mark Fuhrman, a neo-Nazi himself However, this perfidy on the part of Clark, Shapiro, Goldberg, Goldman, Hodgeman, Harmon, and others not only included Jews it included a few negroes, along with some identifiable caucasian/whites as well. By demonizing Simpson the clandestine white power structure could recapture the moral high ground in LA and in the nation as a whole while dangerously engendering racial animus among whites. However, the danger and seditious conduct were apparently worth the price. The fact that Clark, Shapiro, Darden, and Cochran received several million dollars was simply an ancillary incentive but in our opinion was not the primary purpose of destroying this American sports icon.

        They diverted the attention away from their own malfeasance by vicariously poisoning the mainstream of public discourse relative to black males in general in this nation all for pecuniary gain, power, and celebrity. However, Johnson states in his books he believes that Johnnie Cochran stealthily maneuvered his way onto the white only Simpson defense team because he knew the corruption engaged in by the LADA’s office since Cochran had been the third most powerful prosecutor in the DA’s office for 3 years from, I believe 78-81. He needed the potential leverage of his personal knowledge of their engaging in malfeasance to secure the release and compensation of one of his first clients framed during his initial naive years as a defense attorney. Thus, Johnson believes that Cochran would secure the release after 29 years of the innocent framed Elmer “Geronimo” Pratt and a $3.75 million dollar settlement from both Los Angeles County and the FBI on behalf of Pratt within that same year of his release, 1997. Cochran knew that they, including himself, had engaged in concealing the actual phone records of Simpson’s in-law, Juditha Brown, which in all probability would have made a final phone call to Nicole at around 11PM when Simpson was climbing into the back seat of a limo to LAX to catch an 11:45 PM flight to Chicago. Cochran went along with prosecutors moving the time back to a more convenient time of 09:37 PM for Simpson to have time to commit murder. However, when they did that they created an impossible travel time for the Browns upon leaving Brentwood LA at approximately 08:45 to arrive at the south end of Orange County at Dana Point, in approximately 45+ minutes. That’s normally a 90 minute to two-hour drive in 1994 due to HOV construction. The highway data for that night indicates extremely high traffic volume rivaling 85% of work week peak hour volumes and high density, slowing driving speeds to below 30 MPH across all lanes. Here’s Cochran below possibly slipping to reveal that he knew they were entering phony phone records. https://youtu.be/Bk3Muy_MgJA

        Like

      • icareviews
        August 11, 2017

        There was no “white only” Simpson defense team if Jews were involved. Jews aren’t white, nor do they like whites. They masquerade as whites when it suits them but operate politically as a distinct group. Some acknowledge this, but most obfuscate on this subject, while whites generally are not conscious of the differences between themselves and Ashkenazim. And believe me, there’s no “white power structure”, or at least not one working to further the interests of whites. There are plenty of white politicians in powerful positions, but they’re uniformly prostitutes in the employ of business and Jewish lobby groups. If there was a “white power structure” devoted to the preservation of white supremacy, as so many people seem to think, I doubt if it would be so busily demographically displacing its constituency with foreigners and turning whites into a minority.

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 11, 2017

        You’re preaching to the choir, on that I wholeheartedly agree.

        Liked by 1 person

      • BMan
        August 11, 2017

        I have been reading his posts (and interactions here) with keen interest. Thus far, I do not get the same impression you do of his work.

        Like

      • icareviews
        August 11, 2017

        I know, all this name-calling stuff he’s gotten into with “Chang” is pretty embarrassing. What I’m referring to is the work by T.H. Johnson and Henry S. Johnson. I need to read all the books these guys have published eventually, as the interviews you can find online are pretty fascinating.

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 11, 2017

        Well, I apologize to some of you fellows, but that’s a part of the contract that goes with this level of service within OMIG’s PR department. We are obligated to entertain whomever, including those like Chang except I made a mistake and was reprimanded since that interaction only applies to OMIG’s sites on Youtube where you may see one or more of the clips from our documentary SERPENTS RISING. https://youtu.be/itbSHYJAZEo

        I am sorry for despoiling your site with such crude epitaphs, it just becomes second nature after years of dealing with various characters. Which requires quite often getting down to their gutter level in an attempt to reach a mutual understanding. You’ve presented some interesting questions, however. Whether you believe we have anything in common or not I would encourage you to not remain silent in terms of this cover up regarding manufactured evidence versus concealed evidence in the Simpson case. What these people got away doing is very dangerous. They’ve continued to promote these allegations 20 years later, making Simpson public enemy number one while most of the country could not tell you the names of the two defendants who blew up the Muir Federal building in Oklahoma City in the midst of the Simpson trial killing 168 men, women and babies. However, they don’t have a problem assigning guilt to an individual when they see a white SUV on TV. This ability to usurp the communications networks and promulgate fraudulent tabloid news as the veritable news has become a profitable cottage industry that has made a number of people rich but it dangerously allows a limited few to control the mainstream of information and discourse in the West.

        We have the actual shoe sole from SILGA the Italian manufacturer but neither the corrupt FBI agent or prosecutors will tell you the dimensions of that shoe sole is far smaller than Simpson’s foot. We have his foot tracing too and Simpson’s foot extends over the sides of the edges on 4 sides. Thus, it challenges the ceracity of the photos that would miraculously show up almost three years later. We know there was no way for the FBI agent who testified to determine in 1994 that one brand of shoe made the prints in blood since the raised heel prevented the Bruno Magli logo from touching the ground and the same soles were sold to 20 additional companies around the globe besides Bruno Magli. The testifying FBI agent would later admit this in a republished text book he re-issued 4 years after the Simpson trial in 1999.

        We have the highway data from the CALTRans traffic engineers which indicate that the enormous traffic volume prevented OJ’s in-laws from making that final call that was changed three times from 11PM to finally 09:37 PM making it available for Simpson to commit double murder. Since if his ex-wife Nicole was on the phone with her mother at 11PM Simpson was in the backseat of a limo to LAX.

        These are simply a few pieces of evidence that OMIG investigators have done their due diligence examining crime scene photos and autopsy reports, and the evidence told to the public simply is not in synch with the actual evidence or the circumstantial evidence that contradicts their assertions. http://maddoggbuttkickingbrown.blog/2016/12/01/damaging-lies-in-the-oj-simpson-trial/

        Like

      • icareviews
        August 11, 2017

        Again, I encourage readers to be open-minded about the wealth of information you’re presenting; and, by the same token, I’ll recommend that you look into the obviously fraudulent Oklahoma City bombing narrative, which calculatedly paints Midwestern whites, conservatives, nationalists, Christians, and gun enthusiasts as domestic terrorists. The documentary A Noble Lie is a good place to start.

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 11, 2017

        I’ll take a look.

        Like

    • Chang
      August 10, 2017

      You are an idiot.
      The negro is the most racist creature of all.
      I used to live in a negro area and all they talked of were racist things against people except when they do the crime.
      You are one of those negroes who tries to fool people into thinking you have intelligence by using millions of words, but you fool no one!
      I spit on you and I spit on OJ.
      He deserve what he get because he drug addict.
      Only a fool or another negro would waste time to pity him.
      You have a wonderful day now and try not to get arrested.
      😉

      Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 10, 2017

        Yep! You caught me, you Master’s Degree having goofy peckawood SOB! It took an intellectually astute filthy zombie mofo like you to point me out. We knew when those Jews concealed that crucial evidence exonerating Simpson, by Clark, Golden, Goldman, Harmon, Shapiro, Goldberg, and Hodgman and passed that phony b.s. on to other so called “unwitting” Jews like Rivera, Grodin(sky, Alred, Walters, Kouric, and others in the media for profit it was going to irreparably damage the delicate racial atmosphere in America, and it has. We knew that it was too many retarded pigfucking slope head mofos like you with a pea sized brain that could not see beyond this Kindergarten racist b.s. You’re too freaking blinded by racism you stupid SOB to see that this madness you believe in to tell me about some irrelevant *ish about “living in a negro area” is about as important as whether you wiped your stinking rotten ass. You’re too stupid to see that if they could do this to someone with the resources of OJ Simpson an incest engaging, sheep screwing, retard like you don’t have a chance. All it’s been good for is leading ignorant fools like you to cliff while they’ve made millions. GTFOH, you pathetic cretin!

        Liked by 1 person

    • Chang
      August 10, 2017

      You people are so angry and crooked, you are a curse on this world. Only the white man is foolish enough to support you while you repay him with violence and hatred. You better hope nothing happens to the White man because the Asians, Latins and Jews hate you. The Jews will not give you welfare, but they will make you slaves again if you can behave.
      The negro is like a little child who needs someone to take care of him but he never appreciates help but instead kills the goose who laid the golden egg.
      You are a black fool. I see you even like your own comment. You probably even think your own shit is special.

      Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 10, 2017

        You are a freaking retard, you stupid SOB. You don’t have a clue about your own history let alone mine you freak. If you did you’d know that the same mofos who kidnapped people from a continent and destroyed a nation of people that fed you mofos when you were cannibalizing each other on the Virgina shores are the same ones from Africa whose 19th century invention allows you to be seen in darkness, since Edison’s light bulb only stayed on an hour before burning out. We’re the same people who perfected the stop light to keep you road raging Mofos from killing each other in an intersection, and the same people who invented over the road refrigeration to keep a dumb SOB like you with fresh meat and produce. You mofos have been stealing credit for *ish for the last 400 years. So F*** what you’re talking about you helmet wearing beast and take that invented b.s. about taking care of somebody on to that special ed bus stop, talk that b.s. to all the kids on that little yellow bus when you’re not trying to molest one of them, you perverted freak. I can tell by your language you’re one step away from poverty or blowing up that funky ass trailer you that dog live while trying to manufacture crystal meth. Get The F! on, simple mofo.

        Like

  14. Chang
    August 10, 2017

    Perhaps the arrogant negro would be so kind to explain something to me I never understood, you claim credit for so many wonderful inventions yet your average IQ is that of an imbecile. Any one who has dealt with you people knows this and every IQ test you have been given confirms it. I do not think it can be possible for one who has not even an understanding of basic math to do most of the things you claim you have. Over half your women have herpes, you represent 50% of the AIDS cases and you commit 53% of the homicides in America. You people really do have the minds of little children and you never want to take responsibility for your own actions. You always blame others for your own misfortunes.
    I think it’s obvious that white racism is not your problem, rather it is your own lack of intelligence. The fact every single majority black area is a crime ridden slum bears this out.
    Are you by any chance a black muslim? I ask because you sound indoctrinated with outrageous pro-black propaganda.

    http://www.rolereboot.org/culture-and-politics/details/2014-09-sexual-abuse-code-silence-black-community/

    Blacks commit all crimes far more often than whites, including child molestation. The fact there are about five times more whites than negroes in this country can make the statistics confusing if you don’t know how statistics work. Plus, you know, in the black community “snitches get stitches” so a lot of nasty stuff goes unreported so it wont look as bad as it really is.

    Anyway you just go on blaming whitey every time you bump your head or cut your finger since that approach is really paying off, eh champ?

    Now please type out a five page response because I find that very impressive.

    Please don’t get angry and go out and kill some random old lady or anything! Heres a funny video to lighten your mood:

    Like

    • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
      August 10, 2017

      Stupid Mofo what in the F*** does this have to do with objective evidence concealed in the Simpson case? Carry this juvenile b.s. on with some blacks who care about this irrelevant b.s. you’re talking about. I don’t give a F*** about these irrelevant statistics you simple moron. If you live in America you are losing anyway because those white folks with wealth have always pit you poor ass white SOBs against blacks while they’ve historically robbed your poor dumb ass and blamed others for your demise, you stupid idiot. I’m here to enlighten your dumb ass that they’ve done it to you ignorant fools again with this Simpson madness.

      How in the F*** are you going to compete against the world when they know what buttons to push to split your manpower and divide and conquer you pathetic SOBs. I don’t give a damn about your mother, your sister or your wives, I’m not trying to compete with you in no such manner whatsoever but you have less claim over this country than I so get over it, because it appears that neither of us is going anywhere but down pissing on each other.

      I’m here to impart vital information that may help some pathetic poor ass SOB like you before they frame your ignorant ass too and destroy your miserable life. You’re just low hanging fruit, too easy to insult and refer to with fucked up names. I’m more interested in those other fellows that had at least some interesting insight and questions regarding what our investigators have uncovered. You have nothing to offer so get the F*** on. I have no interest in that b.s you’re talking about. Call that nothing ass Oprah and see if she wants to bring your dumb ass on her show to talk about this irrelevant b.s. you’re trying to pass off as relevant.

      You white folks are just as F** up in this nation as blacks. The labor in this nation is done by the new negroes, the Latinos. The customer service is contracted out to India and Jamaica, the Great Lakes iron belt has been abandoned and the new wlefare recipients like Mitt Romney and company subsidized to move the industrial industries overseas to China and India.

      But you’re still here with this stale ass b.s. trying to denigrate me while your own people have filled up the prisons with meth traffickers, and your people are dying at a rate of about 100 per day strung out on prescription opioid drugs. So, you dumb peckawood mofo, despite this fantasy you think you know, you’re not God’s gift to the world. You’re just another poor ass mofo trying to survive that continues to look in the wrong direction while letting those off the hook who have continued to F***over your stupid dumb ass, and point you in the opposite direction while laughing at how foolish you are all the way to the bank, you dummy.

      I haven’t stolen a MFing thing from your trailer park ass, Mofo. So, GTF on!. All this b.s. you’re talking is not addressing any of the malfeasance involved in this Simpson case; so get your football helmet and go stand by the bus stop and wait for that little yellow bus to pull up, you freaking imbecile.

      Like

  15. Chang
    August 10, 2017

    Oh, and I believe you took credit for the traffic light:

    Like

    • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
      August 10, 2017

      Like

      • BMan
        August 11, 2017

        Excuse me.

        As interesting as your information has been thus far, I want to understand why you made the claim about the traffic light and now I see you were wrong (or lying). Why would I watch your spammed list of videos I assume could easily be discounted like your first claim was?

        Please don’t attack my trailer park.

        Liked by 1 person

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 11, 2017

        “”Wrong” is a more plausible option for you at this point, since Garrett Morgan has always been the one given credit for the invention of the stop light for whom I’m aware. It appears that the white fellow is in that zone where he claims to have been the inventor of a similar device but didn’t file a patent and the black inventor filed his first. Thus, all it indicates at this time was that there were multiple inventors attempting to address a problem that they saw at an intersection. It certainly doesn’t imply that one stole the concept from the other, at least you all haven’t shown me where the white man has made such veritable claim against anyone including Morgan. Although I know it happens it generally has been on the other side where blacks came up with a pragmatic invention and either worked for a white owned corporation that normally claims a right to all intellectual property when a person is on the payroll or in other cases just outright have told blacks you don’t have money to file a patent so you might as well give it to me. That activity certainly occurred in the music industry where white record label owners steal the publishing along with writer’s royalties from the creators of some of the most popular musical works of the 20th century.

        Like

      • Chang
        August 12, 2017

        OMG! 67 IQ negro invented the cell phone? LOLOLOLOL!!! You are a crazy if you really believe that! How can you make a cell phone out of sticks, leaves and mud? LOLOL!!

        This has been wonderful. You have shown all the readers of this blog what a delusional, psychotic man child you really are. I really doubt anyone is at all interested in your bone head theories about your love interest OJ now. Thank you for this enlightening performance! LOL! Well done!

        I’m sorry, but I have better things to do besides watch all your dishonest videos. Those are just fairy tales for black babies anyway. Also, I confess I’ve not read 50 words of the miles of redundant text you have maniacally typed out for us all because I have talked to so many of you black muslim UFO cult fanatics, hebrew israelites, black egyptians and all the other clinically retarded cults that attract you angry, maladjusted monkeys that I already often know what you are going to say before you even say it.

        Again, thank you for showing everybody how ignorant, arrogant and angry you are. Now that they see you are crazy they know that all your ideas are equally crazy.
        I know why you are always so angry. It is hard to be stupid and not understand the world, so you are always angry and violent because you wonder why you don’t have what others have, like nice, loving families, rewarding employment or clean comfortable homes. I can only laugh at your pathetic life. I think it is very funny that you have given yourself this imaginary job of proving OJ’s innocence! LOLOLOL!!! You are such a delusional, comedic fool! This should not surprise us though since you have the intelligence of a 13 year old and I suppose I thought a lot of strange things when I was that age.

        I also find your retarded ad hominem attacks quite amusing. You have this whole story about me living in a trailer park cooking meth and all that other stuff you got off TV and movies. I hate to tell this too you, but movies and TV aren’t real! You things have the minds of children so you think everything you see is really happening. This is obviously true judging by how black on white crime increases whenever a new movie about slavery comes out. I’m sure that can be very confusing for you but just remember its all playacting. I know life can be hard when you are simple but it’s wrong to take it out on other people because it’s not their fault you’re dumb.TV and movies are made by jews who want to warp your mind and I’m sure they are delighted to see how successful they were with you. But with a small mind like yours I don’t suppose it was very much work.

        You pretend to have intelligence, but I bet you look like your icon, a crazy savage gorilla with filed teeth. I bet you rape babies and old women. I have seen dozens of news stories reporting negroes just like you doing such things.
        https://www.amren.com/news/2012/08/20-year-old-man-caught-by-his-father-trying-to-rape-his-grandmother-because-he-couldnt-get-a-girlfriend/

        Why are you so in love with OJ? You probably think he’s the father you never had.

        I will leave now, but please study the following link. (I know you will not, but I know others will):
        http://tightrope.cc/Black-Invention-Myths.htm

        Since you prefer TV here is a video for you (I really think you need to watch this one:

        Like

      • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
        August 12, 2017

        Chang, you’re a worthless dummy, and a disgrace to your race, whatever it may be. Truly you sound more like a counter-intelligence operative to me than anything else, and they come in all colors with just a modicum of intelligence. You appear to be masquerading in your feeble minded attempts to scopeshift away from the subject matter of Simpson in accordance with a mandate to undermine the momentum of anyone that you’ve been sent to perpetuate chaos. People like you move in and out among the undisciplined of whosoever is out of step with the powers from whom you’ve taken your clandestine marching orders.

        Certainly, you must interact with people of color somewhere in North America, for which you must respect a chain of command and orders there from, assuming you’re not chiming in from some hovel somewhere above the Arctic Circle. Doesn’t sound like you’ve been in the military service, and if you were you certainly could not obstruct a military command from whoever your commanding officer was without being drummed out for this type of reckless, raggedy, incoherent and scopeshifting silly conduct.

        These African-American men whose questionable link you’ve provided denigrating their accomplishments have been honored by other great men of science who were white, Lewis Latimer worked with Thomas Edison at the Edison Laboratory in New Jersey and despite your link I’m satisfied with his contribution of the filament to Edison’s light bulb to help keep it from burning out after an hour. What is important to me is that these men like Latimer filed their patents and are recognized by the US Patent and Trademark Office for having received official recognition for their inventions. Latimer also worked with Alexander Graham Bell and helped him to receive a patent on the telephone by providing Bell with the needed drafts of his invention in order to gain the recognition in a timely manner when submitted in Bell’s patent application. He did it because that’s what Latimer, the black man did best, besides develop pragmatic inventions, produce recognizable mechanical drawings for patent applications.

        The noted botanist and inventor George Washington Carver due to the mutual respect for the environment and potential products to be garnered from the peanut, and grains, developed a mutual scientific friendship with Henry Ford. Whereas both men were convinced that automobiles could run off of ethanol due to the limited future existence of gasoline Carver would be invited to Ford’s Headquarters in Dearborn, MI to meet with and exchange ideas with Henry Ford in regard to their intent to develop that particular area of botanical science for its commercial purposes.

        Yes, there is an overlap in some of these inventions but I would suspect that it is due to the fact that even during the most intense times of racism, de facto and de jurie, in this nation, intelligence, particularly in the area of science, respected intelligence in spite of skin color. You’ll find in your readings if you get beyond literature absorbed simply to support your intent of nullification that men of color and white men interacted with each other to achieve the success of these pragmatic inventions at a time of great inventive activity.

        You live in your Lilliputian world which makes me wonder how do you think that you would survive if attacked with your limited manpower from a foreign power when you continue to sow seeds of discontent and divide your society. Because of your divisional rhetoric, all you can do now is cry about your inability to compete industrially with these emerging nations of the world. Even if you could have five wives you’re not going to produce enough children to make yourself a significant power. Out of ignorance you are promoting a concept of diminishing returns.

        When you spend time, as the power structure has done in dumbing down a nation they dumb down many more white people too. Look at the condition of your people, man. You hold no noble position anymore, they distract your attention while they misuse and rob you while passing the blame on me being your enemy. The people you admire and bow down to betray you continually, particularly if you are poor. And let’s face it, brother Chang, your rhetoric and myopic vision and limited regurgitated knowledge imply that you are simply a poor white man. In my opinion, human beings are human beings with skin over a skeleton and they all look the same under an X-Ray machine. Anything else is an exaggerated exercise, a distorted invention of man’s mind that is generally used as a justification for exploitation for personal gain.

        I have no fascination for Simpson one way or the other, I neither am a friend or foe of Simpson. What I am is a friend of justice, and as miserable as you sound if this organization found the irregularities and contradictions in evidence that we’ve discovered in the trenches related to this Simpson case, we’d stand for you too. I’d have no problem in stating that even though you sound like a worthless, racist, ignorant POS, those who have charged you have engaged in malfeasance in framing the wrong man.

        I don’t hate all white people since I have enough sense to know that all white people didn’t engage in promulgating this madness regarding Simpson around the world. However, I am condemning those who conceal themselves among you that we have identified as concealing evidence but become afraid when we expose them for what they have done regarding their dangerous seditious activity of destabilizing the delicate racial balance in this nation for their own pecuniary interests.

        Look at Simpson’s foot on top of the infamous expensive $180 Bruno Magli casual shoes, the FBI agent who testified didn’t even bother to go to the jail and measure Simpson’s foot. You’ll see his foot doesn’t fit in even the 12 and 1/4 inch shoe sole which is the equivalent of a size 10 in the US. Our investigators saw the foot prints in the side walk tiles at the crime site and later combed through the testimony and found the dimensions of the side walk tiles at 11 and 1/2 inches square. That presented a problem with Simpson’s much larger foot measurement. http://maddoggbuttkickingbrown.blog/2017/08/12/an-erroneous-o-j-lie-found-in-a-shoe-print/

        Like

    • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
      August 10, 2017

      Like

    • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
      August 10, 2017

      Like

    • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
      August 10, 2017

      Like

    • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
      August 10, 2017

      Like

    • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
      August 10, 2017

      Like

    • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
      August 10, 2017

      Like

    • MaddDoggButtkickingBrown
      August 10, 2017

      I’ve grown tired of giving you a lesson since I doubt that you are intelligent enough to appreciate the depth of its meaning so I will leave with these meager few to digest. https://youtu.be/Dgn2pzOnL6Y

      Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: