Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Angel, Angel, Down We Go

angel-angel-archangel

Archangel, who made his first appearance in X-Factor no. 24, would later visit the FBI at the site of the downing of United Flight 93.

angel-angel-garrett

Wendy Garrett

Kansas City neoconservative talk radio station KCMO now has a lightweight paranormal program, Wendy’s Coffeehouse, that airs on Saturday mornings. The host, Wendy Garrett, covers horseshit ranging from UFO sightings to encounters with ghosts, and today her guest was Lillie Leonardi, the author of In The Shadow of a Badge: A Memoir about Flight 93, a Field of Angels, and My Spiritual Homecoming. Leonardi worked in the Office of Public Affairs for the FBI’s Pittsburgh Division, and was dispatched to the scene of Flight 93’s impact on September 11th, 2001. Ten years after the fact, she claimed to have seen angels on that day, as she recounted for Garrett’s listeners:

angel-angel-lillie

Lillie Leonardi

And in those initial moments of standing there I witnessed what I call a legion of angels present themselves on that field around the perimeter of the crash site. And, uh, like most […] had a multitude of responses to it – emotional, spiritual, and analytical – and it led me on a journey that it took quite a while to resolve in my mind. […]

All my years in law enforcement, the hardest question to answer to loved ones when they lose someone is “why”; and in those first days, although we knew why, there were a lot of unanswered questions that we would be responsible to relate to, uh, not only those families but to, uh, those in positions of power that needed to know and needed to be able to answer that long-lasting question, to this day: “why”.

Leonardi made more than one reference to her “analytical mind” during the broadcast, but kept the conversation focused on the pastel and the irrational, avoiding the analytical altogether. Notwithstanding the FBI’s ostensible responsibility to the victims and to the public to properly probe one of the most important crime scenes in American history – to determine the “why” of this perpetration of mass slaughter – Leonardi instead indulged in a rote emotionalism salved with passive mysticism as she recounted her risible 9/11 phantasmagoria, suggestively prompting the audience to experience it with her:

angel-angel-x-factorI remember I wanted to cry and, uh, didn’t allow myself to do it, but, oh, I kept thinking about how many mothers wouldn’t be able to say goodbye to their children that day, relating from a mother and a grandmother’s standpoint on that day. And then […] completely horrified by what you’re looking at and praying to God for His divine, uh, intervention and guidance, and, uh, as the flickers, but stronger, my attention kept being drawn to, uh, what then appeared to look like white light, like, you know, I tell people when I go to, uh, talk about the book in different locations, the brightness and the coloration of that light, um, you can’t – I can’t describe it, I’ve never seen a cloud as white, I’ve never seen anything as white and as brilliant as that light was that day. And within a matter of moments, the light turned into what I call like a mist, um, and then it parted and there were the angels, the archangels, just in military, precise military formation. I call them a legion because there were so many, there were rows and rows and rows. And as you looked, their features began to fade. Uh, from my recollection, I saw male and female facial features, I saw skin color that looked representative of our entire world.

Not only does Leonardi’s tableau appear to give God’s sanction to the coming War on Terror – one of the angels in her vision points a saber at the earth – she even draws an instructive parallel between the Roman and Zio-American empires with her evocative use of the word “legion” to describe the mustering of archangels. The account is also noteworthy, of course, for its inclusive characterization of the Almighty’s imperial army, with all the world’s races joined together to fight in this global crusade against radical Islamic terrorism. Garrett and Leonardi never got around to discussing “that long-lasting question, to this day” of the “why” of the 9/11 attacks or the outcome of the wars that followed, but did see fit to plug the author’s forthcoming book and also to pitch an angelically themed television and radio project tentatively titled AngelQuest: In Search of Messengers.

angel-angel-arch

“Let’s roll.”

As for the angels Leonardi claims to have seen in Pennsylvania, she might do well to consider some recent remarks from Charles Giuliani on a 9/11-relevant episode of his Truth Hertz podcast:

charles-giuliani

Charles Giuliani

And once you understand Yahweh to be the evil prick that he is […] you’re not following something good. You see the mindfuck? Bible dupes think they’re following something good. He’s the source of all morality, and if you’re not following Him you’re not really moral. But yet, they’ll turn around and say, “Oh, well, I know it’s not wrong to kill babies on some occasions. In fact, on some occasions it’s good to kill babies when Yahweh says to do it.” […] Do you see how the book that people are led to believe is moral is actually heinously immoral? All the evil acts that you abhor – that your conscience, if you have one, demands that you abhor – as a Bible dupe, you have to leave the door open to embrace those evils on certain occasions, because that’s all Yahweh stands for, is pure fucking evil, under the cloak of something good. […] Jesus fucking Christ. Didn’t the Apostle Paul say that the Devil comes transformed as an angel of light? Oh, yeah, absolutely, and no better example can be cited of that than Yahweh Himself. Yahweh comes as an angel of light, doesn’t He, but He’s a fucking demon, a wolf in sheep’s clothing if ever there was one. Oh, the twisted irony of it all. But that’s all you get with the Tribe, isn’t it, is twisted ironies? And that’s the ultimate twisted irony, right there. You want to avoid the cult and all the evils thereof? Stay the fuck away from the Bible. Start there!

Rainer Chlodwig von K.

angel-angel

Advertisements

About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

40 comments on “Angel, Angel, Down We Go

  1. icareviews
    September 10, 2016

    Reblogged this on icareviews and commented:

    The obligatory 9/11 post for Aryan Skynet …

    Like

  2. kerberos616
    September 10, 2016

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

  3. bob saffron
    September 10, 2016

    I don’t know what made the hole at Shanksville, but it sure wasn’t a plane. Let’s roll!

    Like

  4. Hipster Racist
    September 11, 2016

    Guess who was an eyewitness and suggested there were bombs used – and said so on the radio the day of?

    Liked by 1 person

    • bob saffron
      September 12, 2016

      That talc-powder-fine dust inches thick everywhere demands an explanation.

      Like

    • Sam J.
      September 12, 2016

      Interesting. First time I’ve seen that and I’ve seen a lot of 9-11 vids. Roger Stone went on Alex Jones (yes I know Jones is full of shit but he does say a few things that are true), anyways Stone said that Trump knows there’s something “hinkey” about 9-11.

      I know your feeling about Trump but I still say there’s no way to tell for sure what his angle is. It is possible that the main reason he’s running is 9-11. He may see it as an intolerable affront to him, his country and his city to let them get away with this. By playing it low key he can stay alive until he gets in office. If it were me I would make it a platform to run on but he;s smarter than I am so…

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        September 12, 2016

        Trump seemed honestly surprised by 9/11, just like Giuliani. Trump has never really been an “insider.” He’s very intelligent, high IQ, no doubt, but he comes across, as one of the OD commenters said, as somewhat of a savant. Remember – Trump has been a celebrity since the 1980s. He’s done innumerable interviews with the press. Sometimes he’s been far more emotive about things like depression than is normal for an oligarch or a powerful high IQ person. In some ways, he seems to have been somewhat of a dupe in certain business transactions.

        Famously, he tried to get control of the WTC and rebuild the towers in 2002, but he didn’t seem particularly serious about it, it came across as publicity stunt more than anything.

        He has flirted with “conspiracy theories” more than any other politician, certainly, and he’s brought up 9/11 on numerous occasions in a very unusual way. Sometimes it came across as a threat to the Bushes.

        But I’m really, really hesitant to impute to someone like Trump some sort of “secret plan” or “ulterior motive.” Kevin MacDonald said that Trump has to be “hyper-aware” of Jewish power but that “savant” thing may come into play too.

        What can we make of someone like Bill Gates? Gates is some sort of hyper-genius with a well known obsession with IQ. It’s simply impossible to believe that Bill Gates is not aware of the racial differences in IQ and the implications that has. He has 90 billion dollars – he could do anything he wants. He famously merged his fortune with Warren Buffet – another WASP billionaire that is completely independent on the Wall Street/Bosh-Wash and (kosher) establishment.

        I started hoping Trump would win when I first heard him mention 9/11 – doesn’t change my political analysis really. Presidents simply do not have unlimited power and just look at the history of political assassinations in America, it’s hardly uncommon. So I have no illusion that Trump is going to announce a new investigation or anything. But who knows, anything is possible.

        Trump or Clinton will win or lose regardless of what I do or think, so I’ll just have to wait and see.

        Like

      • icareviews
        September 12, 2016

        Gates is just out to make a buck. He’s heavily invested in GMO crops and a neo-imperialist agenda in Africa and plainly doesn’t give a shit about humanity.

        Like

      • icareviews
        September 12, 2016

        “He may see it as an intolerable affront to him, his country and his city to let them get away with this.”

        If so, then he should do us a favor and jump to his death from the roof of Trump Tower since he’s been a team player in the ZOG establishment’s blame-anybody-but-Israel game.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        September 12, 2016

        What you said about people not being aware is something I’m struggling with. I wrote about building #7 on another blog and the guy is real smart but he just doesn’t get it. He doesn’t understand that a building can’t fall the same speed as a rock dropped in air. That there’s resistance to a building falling no matter how many fires. It’s depressing that people can be so blind. Building #7 is what made me question all of what is going on and lead me to I guess you could call the Jew question. I knew after looking at build #7 that it just could not be as we were told. But if so many people are so stupid they can’t understand high school physics. It’s just depressing because the answer is right in front of their faces.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        September 12, 2016

        Never overestimate the number of people who understand high school physics.

        But even more than that, 9/11 is simply a taboo. Like race, even when people are smart enough to understand it, they don’t want to, because it’s taboo.

        I’ve talked to real life people about my experiences on 9/11 and the aftermath. The usual response I get is, “yeah sure the government probably was involved, that’s why you shouldn’t talk about it Hipster, you might get into trouble.”

        That one intel guy said when you want to stop the truth from coming out, you deny, distract, and ridicule – and ridicule is the most effective.

        Also there are honest-to-god “handlers” – professional 9/11 liars – that are attached to various online forums. Mr Rational was one that stalked me for over a year. If you watch the video about Steven Jones, they actually interview a guy that basically admitted to threatening and offering to bribe Jones to shut up about 9/11. I think most of that is in the past because they just don’t care anymore but certainly no one with any power is going to acknowledge it.

        Who knows, maybe that is why certain segments of the establishment really seem terrified of Trump. The neo-cons – who is some sense should be just fine with Trump – certainly seem panicked about him. Maybe he really is a loose cannon on this issue. Time will tell.

        Like

      • bob saffron
        September 12, 2016

        @ HR: As I see it, Giuliani was an integral part of the gig, a real insider.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        September 12, 2016

        Maybe after the fact but I don’t think Giuliani knew before hand, I think he was being handled by Bernard Kerik.

        Like

      • watchmilliondollarextremepresentsworldpeace1215amfriday
        September 17, 2016

        Re: High School Physics (can’t reply to the message I want)

        Part of the 9/11 thing, IMO, is something akin to “buyer’s remorse”.

        I’ve been conned in “sales” (by Jews no less) and when near “closing the deal” I had a strange feeling that I was about to be duped or conned.

        And yet I felt it would be “rude” or “embarassing” to call off “the deal” at the last minute.

        So I went along with it. And got screwed. And it actually took years to admit I had been screwed, with a lot of rationalization going on until then.

        9/11 is kinda like that, along with the rest of it. Think of all the things in the past 50-100 years “we” accept as true, good, etc. but which turns out are just a big con. It’s rough admitting you’ve been a dupe. Especially if you have a personal investment in it.

        That likely accounts for it more than a (mis)understanding of physics.

        Hell, just go on youtube and watch videos of poorly constructed skyscrapers from China or Dubai that are ablaze that don’t collapse, and then come back to WTC 7, or even 1 and 2. It doesn’t add up. It’s got nothing to do with physics.

        Liked by 1 person

      • McZOG
        September 25, 2016

        Roger Stone went on Alex Jones (yes I know Jones is full of shit but he does say a few things that are true), anyways Stone said that Trump knows there’s something “hinkey” about 9-11.

        Roger Stone is Donald Trump’s C.I.A. contact / handler. Roger Stone was introduced to Donald Trump by Roy Cohn, who was Donald Trump’s C.I.A. handler from 1973 to 1985. Another C.I.A. spook recently connected to Donald Trump is the Israeli/Russian Chabad Lubavitch mafia figure Felix Sater.

        Alex Jones is a confirmed C.I.A. agent/asset/operative. His entire extended family is full of intelligence spooks, both C.I.A. and D.o.D.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        September 25, 2016

        Zogowitz:

        Please show your evidence that Stone and/or Cohn are or were CIA. Thanks in advance.

        Like

    • clytemnestra57
      September 19, 2016

      See that’s what I will never understand about the 911 narrative. Those buildings were obviously taken down by a controlled demolition. If the public was expected to believe that a bunch of Arabs had flown planes into the twin towers and the Pentagon, why not posit the theory that Arabs had infiltrated the WTOC maintenance crews and planted the demolitions? It’s a plausible theory.

      It might be even what happened. Maybe they sat on the information that maintenance crews had been infiltrated, because they were afraid that people would be afraid to go back to work, particularly in high rises if they admitted as much.

      But it’s been fifteen years already. If Al Quaeda did infiltrate maintenance crews and plant demolitions which helped bring the planes down, they should admit it. Otherwise, it does look like an inside government job.

      Like

      • icareviews
        September 19, 2016

        If Al Qaeda infiltrated the maintenance crews, then the CIA infiltrated the maintenance crews. Al Qaeda and ISIS never appear anywhere the CIA hasn’t already been.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        September 19, 2016

        One reason I’ve never been fully into the “Israel was 100% responsible for 9/11” thing. It seems impossible to me that Israel/Mossad would be able to pull off 9/11 by themselves, without the CIA and the Bush administration.

        And the idea that the CIA is completely run by Mossad doesn’t make any sense either.

        I’m partial to at least some of this analysis:

        https://wikispooks.com

        especially the idea that there were billions of dollars of Brady bonds coming due on 9/12/2001, likely the take from 1980s Latin American cocaine money laundering, with possible ties to the takedown of the USSR. Cantor Fitzgerald – the bond broker that is essentially the core “private” nexus of the international dollar/reserve currency empire – had to be taken off line for a week until all of these bonds could be settled outside of the typical heavily audited computer systems. We know that the Federal Reserve did, in fact, invoke emergency measures.

        I have already hinted at some of this in my fictional story and how some of it may have happened.

        I agree with Cly and have said so before – if they had told me that “Al Qaeda” had infiltrated the cleaning crew and planted bombs, I would have completely believed it. But the insistence that a tiny bit of jet fuel caused three massive skyscrapers to demolish themselves defies not only common sense but high school physics.

        There is, in fact, some indication that they were preparing such a “revelation” – George W. Bush himself once referenced “bombs” being “placed” in the WTC, but it was quickly shrugged off as a “gaffe.”

        There remains the possibility that there was a double/triple cross going on here – a bunch of different players that then started to turn on each other, a Mexican standoff type situation.

        But at this point in history – it’s pointless to waste time arguing with the crap bob saffron is pushing about “CGI planes” and other obvious disinformation. The cover-up continues. Hell – Trump himself has made a campaign issue of “9/11 conspiracy theories” and has promised to let us know “who really knocked those towers down.”

        The “28 pages” – which implicated the Saudis and the Bushes – have been released but are still being spun. We can’t ignore the Obama administration spending the last 8 years putting Likud in their place.

        It’s the cover up, not the crime. So, simply look at the people continuing the coverup – from the “debunkers” saying “nothing to see here” to the spreaders of disinformation like the “no planes CGI” and figure out what their agenda is – that will point to something interesting, I have no doubt.

        Once “Al Qaeda” got too ridiculous to believe, they went quiet for a while then reintroduced them as “ISIS” – which itself quickly fell apart credibility wise. Whatever happened at the gay disco in Orlando, it’s becoming a comedy of errors at this point. (The father of the terrorist was invited to Clinton’s speech – what the hell did that indicate? Considering the guy was a known CIA/Voice of America propagandist – what signal was Clinton sending and to whom was that signal directed?”)

        Whatever happens with this election, I’m always reminded of the fact that people always say “both parties are the same” – then even when you have Clinton and Trump – LONG TIME FRIENDS AND POLITICAL ALLIES – running against each other, each supported by many of the same players, you have to ask yourself why people still insist this dog-and-pony show is “for real” and quickly forget that they just said “both parties are the same.”

        Like

      • icareviews
        September 19, 2016

        I agree with much of what you say here but not that the B.O. administration has been “spending the last 8 years putting Likud in their place.” He’s basically giving Netanyahu a lackluster blowjob – nothing more and nothing less. One article I saw the other day actually had the nerve to spin the new deal for $38 billion in American aid for Israel over ten years as Obama’s “cold revenge” against Netanyahu. The tension is there, and Obama’s people pissed off the Zionist hardliners by only kicking Iran and not stomping them into a puddle of unrecognizable mush, but he’s still a contemptible Shabbos goy. If there’s one positive thing to be said about the Obama years, however – and it’s pitiful that there’s only one thing to mention in eight years of captaining this disaster – it’s that we didn’t get into a hot war with Iran.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        September 19, 2016

        Chris313 has an interesting article about this. Israel is a client state – giving money to Israel is a feature of US empire and it shows still, at the end of the day, it’s the US in the driver’s seat. When Israel starts paying America’s bills, we’ll know who wears the pants in the family.

        Likud has simply played the GOP against Obama for the last few years and it was in the GOP’s interests to play along.

        George H. W. Bush actually said during a press conference that it was “little old me against thousands of Jewish lobbyists.” You can imagine how that went over. So, Perot was allowed into the debate and Clinton was installed into power – Clinton, completely compromised by his inability to keep it in his pants and out of the mouths of Jewesses and the underage shiksa slaves of Epstein and Saban.

        When Clinton actually put some pressure on Israel, they simply went to the GOP which dutifully broke the Lewinsky story. George W. Bush – and his Saudi friends – purposefully made peace with the Israelis via the neo-cons, but after being stabbed in the back over and over again, by the time Bush Jr. was leaving office they were openly attacking each other. Obama has been slowly but surely hanging that noose around the GOP and Netanyahu. It got so bad under the Obama administration that they actually had to create a brand new Israel group, J-Street, because the Obama admin had isolated Israel. In fact, Saudi stepped up to save Israel by having one of their princes openly announce they would abandon the Palestinians and side with Israel.

        It’s quite likely that a President Clinton would keep Likud at arm’s length just like Obama did – including her Jewish oligarch handlers, who hate Likud and Netenyahu as much as you do.

        So, what do you know, here comes “the new Hitler” Trump who not only literally has Likud grandchildren living in Israel, and has not only spent the last years doing the bidding of Likud (Orly Tait’s idiotic “birther” stuff and attacking the Iran deal) but has now reversed the entire history of US policy towards Israel and has openly called for Likud to continue ethnically cleansing the Palestinians and speed up the settlements.

        Hilarious that his rapid (((Daily Stormer))) fanbase is falling for it.

        Of course the US isn’t going to cut off Israel – that is not in the Empire’s interests. But there’s simply no way to understand the post-9/11 world without seeing the “daylight” that has come between the Empire and its favorite girlfriend.

        And it’s not the liberal Democrats doing their best to close the gap – it’s the Republicans.

        Like

      • icareviews
        September 20, 2016

        “It’s quite likely that a President Clinton would keep Likud at arm’s length just like Obama did – including her Jewish oligarch handlers, who hate Likud and Netanyahu as much as you do.”

        Hillary’s arms must not be too long:

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        September 20, 2016

        In 2008 Clinton was paying lip service to Likud when she was positioning herself against the Republicans. That’s not really a surprise.

        No one is going to say “Israel is no longer our ally” or suggest sanctions against them or anything. No ond is going to start quoting David Duke on the “Zionists.”

        Even Mearsheimer and Walt never suggested anything but the smallest realignment – and they were hysterically attacked by the right and the left wings of the Israel connected. But a decade later, and the US isn’t bombing Iran, but in fact trying to draw them in.

        I guess you can look at the glass as half full or half empty, but there’s been a sea change and a realignment. It ain’t 2003 anymore.

        Like

      • icareviews
        September 23, 2016
  5. bob saffron
    September 11, 2016

    Maybe she was thinking of David Angell (ba dum tss!) of Flight 11 fame, purportedly seated next to Mohammed Atta.

    Like

  6. bob saffron
    September 11, 2016

    A terrormonger flies over Manhattan.☺

    Like

  7. bob saffron
    September 13, 2016

    @ HR: From where did you see the plane hit the Tower?

    Like

  8. Pingback: Angel, Angel, Down We Go | Hipster Racist

  9. bob saffron
    September 21, 2016

    A good summary of the case against Giuliani, 9/11 insider.

    Like

  10. bob saffron
    September 21, 2016

    I can’t see how CGI is to be dismissed in such a cavalier manner. Those images don’t conform to physics any more than the Towers’ free-fall. Surely we can admit that the major networks (at a senior level) are highly supportive of Zionist objectives.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      September 21, 2016

      The “CGI” crap is stupid disinfo. Are you suggesting, Bob Saffron, that you **really** believe that there were no planes that hit the WTC, but instead were “CGI” from the TV or some sort of hologram?

      Because I don’t think you believe it at all. I think you’re a troll. Please stop trolling.

      Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        September 21, 2016

        Have you watched a movie from this time period lately? Go back and take a look at the almost unwatchable Spawn adaptation from 1997. CGI could be pretty lame in the late 90s and the period leading into 9/11/01. Even assuming that the CIA had the best digital artists at their disposal, it’s inevitable that special effects become less special over the years, looking less and less convincing. The scary UFOs of one decade become the contemptible joke of succeeding generations. Why risk geopolitics on effects that would be out of date in just a few years?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        September 21, 2016

        Bob Saffron is not only pushing the “CGI planes” disinfo, he’s also trying to push at the “mini-nukes” bullshit. It’s well known disinformation. I bet a few years ago he was posting Judith Woods “Space Beam Energy Weapons” nonsense.

        There’s plenty of doubt about the logistics of what actually happened on 9/11, but it really doesn’t take much to distinguish between a theory based on evidence and a bunch of woo-woo. I mean, why not say laser beams knocked the towers down? You can come up with all sorts of science fiction if you ignore all the evidence

        Now, Bob Saffron isn’t stupid, and he didn’t just discover 9/11 truth yesterday. He’s been at this for years.

        So we know that Bob Saffron has been spreading disinformation for years, under multiple handles, on various WN sites.

        So, you know, take it for what it is. It’s SOP – he’ll always be posting the least credible and most bullshit of “conspiracy theories” for any event like this. I’m sure it is amusing for him.

        Like

  11. bob saffron
    September 21, 2016

    @ Icareviews:
    We’re talking about a few seconds of footage. The thing that the (((Naudet))) brother filmed doesn’t look like a plane. And passenger planes don’t fly at >500 mph at sea-level (whatever NIST says). That first live shot in fact does look crappy, very much B-grade movie stuff. None of the other planes in other clips look or behave like real planes.

    Why would they do this? It’s the most sensible and fail-safe route. Most believe the (((news))) and the few that don’t, well, they can be drowned out in the Truth cacophony.

    As to mini-nukes, DEW, etc. I don’t know. I’m agnostic, but I sure know that conventional explosives, thermite, aren’t satisfactory explanations of what happened.

    Pity Giuliani disposed of the evidence in such haste. Otherwise we might get to some real understanding of what went on.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      September 21, 2016

      “Multiple handles on multiple WN sites? That’s just speculation.”

      You’re Trenchant on TOO and you’ve complained there about not getting printed here because of this “issue.” And Bob Saffron isn’t your first handle here either.

      Come on – no one here is going to be fooled with the “CGI” bullshit. Stop trolling. Your other contributions aren’t worth letting you shit up this blog with your purposeful disinformation.

      Good luck passing it off somewhere else.

      P.S. “soap making” wasn’t “scholarship” – it was mocking the Holocaust-obsessed, both Jews and Nazitards.

      Like

  12. bob saffron
    September 21, 2016

    Hipster Racist is right that I did become aware of the anomalous nature of the detritus through Judy Woods, but it was her colleague Morgan Reynolds who first raised my doubts about the logistics of real passenger planes.

    Multiple handles on multiple WN sites? That’s just speculation. I generally don’t bother. Until the TV goes off, most citizens are in They Live! reality.

    Like

  13. McZOG
    September 25, 2016

    That one intel guy said when you want to stop the truth from coming out, you deny, distract, and ridicule – and ridicule is the most effective.

    All tactics repeatedly employed by you on your blog.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      September 25, 2016

      Zogowitz:

      Feel free to give us any specifics. So far all you have are blanket assertions with no proof, not even a credible argument.

      Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: