Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch
On the evening of Tuesday, November 8, 2016, ABC, CNN, CBS, and ABC declare Hillary Clinton the winner of the 2016 United States Presidential Election. FOX News spends the next 24 hours covering widespread allegations of election fraud in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida. Donald Trump maintains radio silence until Wednesday afternoon, when he gives a rambling, somewhat incoherent speech in which he neither concedes, nor declares victory, and spends 15 minutes repeating the widespread rumors of voting machine irregularities, votes cast by illegal aliens, and missing ballots in key districts in swing states.
Friday morning, after a random police shooting of a young black male, widespread rioting and looting by Black Lives Matter protestors receive non-stop coverage on in the broadcast media and online. Trump takes to social media to denounce “crooked Hillary” and state capitals in red states see muted but large protests by Tea Party like groups.
By January, Clinton is sworn into office and the next Congress is sworn in, the House with a respectable Democratic majority and the Senate with a one vote margin in the Democrat’s favor. President Clinton issues an executive order granting immediate amnesty to all non-citizens residing in the country while the Congress rushes through legislation granting citizenship for all residents covered by the White House order.
The New Tea Party swells in size and begins holding demonstrations around the country, while Trump’s new cable TV and internet video streaming media service provides publicity and live coverage. Trump gives a daily speech, critical of the Clinton administration.
Your assignment: First, list three individuals currently serving (as of September 1, 2016) at high levels in the United States Armed Forces, including the intelligence services, to make an appearance on Trump TV, denouncing the Clinton administration, calling into question the legality and Constitutionality of the Clinton amnesty, and questioning the official explanation of the string of terrorist attacks.
Second, give a short description of the talking points the three individuals could use that would call into question the legitimacy of the Clinton administration and gain public support for extraordinary measures by the military.
Third, list one existing US institution that the three individuals could leverage to pressure the Clinton administration, officially or unofficially. Examples would be the US Conference of Governors, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, the County Sheriff’s Association, or the state of Texas.
Fourth, what concrete action could that institution take that would successfully pressure the Clinton administration to open direct talks with the dissident institution to postpone or reverse the citizenship of the newly amnestied residents.