Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Race Against Time

no-bordersEvery once in a while I go on to reddit to “discuss” issues with the left, the progressives, the liberals, and the anti-whites.

One thing I’ve noticed is that progressives will throw any other issue under the bus in order to promote mass immigration, specifically, non-white immigration.

California already has too many people and not enough water. Maybe reducing immigration into California will help? Progressives say no. Mass immigration is more important than the environment.

Muslims are notoriously anti-gay. Africans are notoriously anti-gay. Progressives claim they support LGBT rights. So perhaps restricting Muslim and African immigration will prevent a new generation of homophobic attacks on LGBT?

Progressives say no. Doesn’t matter. Mass immigration is the only important thing.

Donald Trump’s great crime was simply to suggest any restriction of immigration, legal or illegal, at all. Trump, an anti-racist, pro-Jewish, pro-Israel white man with a Jewish family and grandchildren living in Israel, is constantly compared to Hitler simply because he suggested that immigration was not always in the interests of American citizens.

One of the progressives on reddit even told me that immigrants were superior to citizens, citing a few immigrant CEOs, and how he would rather deport “useless” American citizens and replace them with “worthy” foreigners.

Then, of course, I was banned for “incivility.”

Since the conservative movement since World War II has been nearly as pro-immigration – and anti-white – as the progressive left, no one even has a language with which to oppose immigration and the replacement of American citizens with foreigners. Since even mentioning the term “white” in a non-negative way is “racist” (racism, of course, being the worst crime imaginable) the best the conservatives have been able to do is to make some noises about illegal immigration and teaching newly arrived immigrants English. The idea that America is a nation for Americans, and Americans are a mixed European people, mostly Anglo-German, is thoughtcrime. Although before World War II, really, even before the 1960s, this idea was perfectly mainstream and went without saying, these days it’s unspeakable. The lukewarm restrictionist rhetoric of Donald Trump is as far as anyone is allowed to go, even Trump is just barely getting away with it.

The White nationalist, pro-White, or alt-right movement – whatever you want to call it – has historically spent more time complaining about Blacks and Jews than standing up for the interests of Whites. To go to most ostensibly pro-white sites is to be greeted with childish name-calling, truly hateful rhetoric about other races, and an absolute obsession with homosexuality. Actual pro-White sentiment is still rare, although it is getting better.

When it comes to American politics, immigration is the only issue, it’s all that matters now. The first step to having our own nation is to stop our current nation from being replaced. This author has consistently spoken out against demonizing Muslims and Islam. In Europe, Islam is the demographic threat, in America, it’s Mestizos. But Trump’s proposed ban on immigration from Muslim countries is a step in the right direction simply because it reduces immigration at all. Harping on illegal immigration is a red herring, but stopping illegal immigration is a step in the right direction because it actually does reduce immigration.

White people are a moral people and the job of white advocates is to make a moral case in our interests. The anti-whites really do want to genocide white people, they openly and proudly advocate it. We need a moral case for our continued existence, and we need to call the anti-whites out for what they are: evil. Not misguided, not naive – evil.

We may seem cold, or
We may even be
The most depressing people you’ve ever known
At heart, what’s left, we sadly know
That we are the last truly British people you’ll ever know
We are the last truly British people you will ever know
You’ll never never want to know

dream-act-up

Advertisements

58 comments on “Race Against Time

  1. Pingback: Race Against Time | Hipster Racist

  2. icareviews
    June 15, 2016

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  3. icareviews
    June 16, 2016

    I have one nick-pick with this otherwise excellent post. “To go to most ostensibly pro-white sites is to be greeted with childish name-calling, truly hateful rhetoric about other races, and an absolute obsession with homosexuality.”

    Opposition to homosexuality isn’t my core issue, but it is definitely an issue. If the normalization of child abuse, which is what is being promoted today with the transgender mass psychosis, is not a problem we should be concerned with, then I don’t know what is. Look what this local bitch did to her kid: “Her daughter, Avery, transitioned from male to female at just 4 years old.” Engineering antinatalist insanity in European people is as anti-white as it gets. These practices aren’t close to being as widespread as to constitute as great an immediate threat to our people as immigration, but I would be suspicious of transgender-supportive pro-white advocacy. And our enemies are the ones who are obsessed with dysgenic butt sex, cutting dicks off, injecting children with hormones to mutate their bodies, etc., so to the extent that white nationalists exhibit “obsession” with homosexuality, this is to counter the enemy’s assault on reproductive normalcy.

    http://www.npr.org/2016/05/17/478337140/obama-guidelines-to-protect-transgender-students-is-life-changing

    http://nationalvanguard.org/2016/04/real-child-abuse/

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 16, 2016

      Pro-gayness and anti-gayness are just flip sides of the same coin.

      I just now read a new commenter on my blog. Seemingly pro-white. Even mentioned the Jew Problem. Cool.

      Then I went to his blog. The first image that greeted me? Three homos buttfucking each other.

      Yes, that’s right. I NEVER see homosexual pornography EXCEPT on ostensibly “pro-white” sites.

      How is it Hipster Racist NEVER sees homosexual pornography EXCEPT on supposedly “pro-white” sites?

      Homophobes creep me out as much, if not more, than actual homos. It’s the same thing.

      Look – if I was dictator of America, and I was asked, “define marriage.” I would say: “one man, one woman.”

      Fair enough.

      But people who are obsessed with homos are gay.

      The Catholic Church is the most anti-homo – and the gayest – institution in Western society. I don’t think that is a coincidence. “Celibate = Gay.” Obviously.

      Hilarious that this so-called “alt-right” movement is now run by a race-mixing homosexual “Milo” – who of course, loves Trump.

      The so-called “alt-right” talks about fags more than the progressive left does.

      I say that means something.

      Like

      • icareviews
        June 16, 2016

        “The Catholic Church is the most anti-homo – and the gayest – institution in Western society. I don’t think that is a coincidence.”

        Well, obviously. If you set as one of the job requirements for a profession that the practitioners aren’t allowed to be with women, then you’re naturally going to attract a candidate pool that doesn’t reflect the general population. To say that “people who are obsessed with homos are gay” is a bit disingenuous, though. I don’t see any more emphasis on the gay problem in the alternative media/alt-right/whatever than is warranted by the non-stop promotion of deviant practices in the mainstream media. Somebody brought a comic book to my attention the other day – a comic book, which is presumably intended for an adolescent readership – and the whole story just seemed to be a pretext for showing two women doing each other with ball gags and stuff. The gay stuff isn’t just a fringe subculture like it was in Oscar Wilde’s day. This insanity is being shoved down people’s throats at the checkout line in supermarkets, on the radio, on TV, in school, and even in churches. We’ll have to agree to disagree on this, I guess. I don’t plan on writing a bunch of “obsessive” anti-gay articles anytime soon, and I don’t think a writer’s intellectual contributions should necessarily be shunned because he happens to be gay, but it’s still a form of mental illness as far as I’m concerned and its celebration a product of a distinctly Jewish cultural Marxism-Freudianism. Sure, the Greeks, but whatever. This isn’t ancient Greece and I don’t like the idea of gays leading troops of Boy Scouts through the woods.

        Like

      • cartiermccloud
        June 16, 2016

        It’s MISS McCloud, hipster and I put up those photos to prove a point. Most of my readers have gotten it. Maybe you should read it again. Homosexuality has always been around but the stinking jews have promoted this perversion, among others, to destabilize White, straight societies and are forcing us to accept it by making discrimination (choosing what is best) against them a law, just like questioning the holohoax is against the law in Europe.

        The jews turned Berlin into a sexual cesspool after WW I, just like our society is now. Hitler came to power and cleaned it up and kicked the stinking jews out. And that started WW II.

        We need a hero like him now, not a bunch of brainwashed idiots complaining about a few photos.

        Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 16, 2016

      As far as “transgender” goes – a major figure at John Hopkins (perhaps the most prestigious medical institution on earth) recently wrote an article in the Wall Street Journal saying that “transgendered” people are being exploited by fringe doctors and pharma companies trying to promote their “hormone” drugs.

      Of course, none of this stuff is “normal” or “healthy” – obviously. Of course these people are mentally ill and being exploited.

      Of course, I will never sign on to children being given “hormone therapy” or physical mutilation.

      Obviously.

      But these fringe issues are being used to attack healthy white culture – and I say the people who are triggered by them – who want to make these sorts of issues the “important issues” – are themselves, suspicious.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      June 17, 2016

      No, actually I still disagree. The reason we have such a reaction is because its sexual.

      Where is the outrage about the new heroin epidemic? Heroin is worse than hormone drugs.

      Where is the outrage about the meth epidemic? Meth fucks up people more than transgender drugs do.

      You have druggies giving these drugs to their children. People abuse children all the time. It’s epidemic in all societies.

      But that doesn’t trigger anyone because it’s not about sex.

      Americans eat shit food, horrible gross food. It makes them fat and unhealthy. But there’s no outrage about that, because it’s not sexual.

      The environment is awfully polluted. Pollution probably kills more people than AIDS. But there’s no outrage by that because it’s not sexual.

      You know, I’m a huge fan of E. Michael Jones. He is Catholic, and not in any way, shape, nor form tolerant of homosexuality. He mentions how “sexual liberation” is a form of social control. I’ve written in the past that “outrage porn” is itself a similar thing.

      The Daily Stormer constantly posts images of white women with black men and gay pornography. Who wants to see that stuff? Does anyone really need to be “reminded” that gayness is pretty gross or that miscegenation is anti-white?

      No, of course not. So why do they post stuff like that? Because they get off on it. It’s outrage porn. But outrage porn is, itself, a form of pornography. I have constantly spoken against outrage porn.

      I also note that you mentioned “ball gags and stuff.” No offense, but you are just signaling your own outrage porn there. That is what triggers you. In fact, I do remember that the very first time we met online it was about spanking in movies.

      When I first started my blog, 50 Shades of Grey was the big deal at the time. I found the entire “controversy” to be extremely amsuing. I would write BDSM style stuff because the ladies loved it. Reading about it – and its very complex relationship with the feminist movement – really gave me a deeper understand of women’s psychology. I note that Anolen.com (and everyone knows I am a huge fan of that site) was hardly a fan and very much disapproved of BDSM in general – actually had some interesting things to say about that as well. For her, it was a sort of weakness of character, but she still admitted that it had a certain allure for women.

      For two years I wrote “manosphere” type stuff until I realized that these men weren’t actually interested in “fixing” any problems. They just like being outraged by women acting badly.

      Homosexuality wasn’t invented in the 1960s. It’s always been there. Yes, sexual liberation is a weapon used against our society. But it’s a red herring. It’s a big shiny object that is used to distract us. I say, don’t take the bait. There have always been sexual degenerates and freaks. These things tend to go in cycles. There is tolerance, than intolerance, then tolerance again.

      Sexual politics is a loser for us. It’s where they are strong and we are weak.

      “They” would love us to be fighting over some theoretical “transgender” that might be using the wrong bathroom. Because the tiny, tiny minority of mentally ill people that think they are “transgender” are completely irrelevant.

      If we were actually interested in creating a healthy sexual culture for white people – we would be doing just that. But as my years in the “manosphere” has shown me, no one is actually interested in that. No one breathes a word about getting young women and men married and starting families. No one breathes a word about making early family formation economically affordable.

      All anyone wants to do is seek out “gross out” porn, icky gay stuff, slutty women, mudsharks, and other examples of degeneracy. As far as I can tell, they seek this stuff out because they enjoy it. Just like crazy feminists look for “rapey” fiction everywhere, just like college feminist girls write their own rape fantasies about “conservative” frat boys.

      No, of course, not every man that disapproves of homosexuality is “secretly gay.” Not every women concerned about rape is secretly into hardcore BDSM. Not every white man that disapproves of miscegenation is a cuck.

      But at some point, people focus on the things they focus on.

      The point of this article is the fact that white countries – and only white countries – are being overrun with immigration. Instead of staying focused on that, laser-like, the “alt-right” spends half of it’s time talking about gay butt sex. I say there is a reason for that.

      Like

      • icareviews
        June 17, 2016

        I actually did write a post about the heroin epidemic among whites on this site. Also, I regularly point to the glorification of drugs in movies with my write-ups at icareviews. As far as why people write more about problems than solutions, part of it has to do with human interest. Nobody wants to go see a movie about people without any problems. They want disaster and monsters. There is, of course, the risk that white nationalist advocacy devolves into a form of entertainment and nothing more; but I guess I’m just not visiting the same pages you are, because I’m not seeing people spending “half” of their time taking about homosexuals. I hardly ever look at the Daily Stormer, though, so if Anglin is doing that, I wouldn’t know. Mostly, what I see people wasting their time with is just a bunch of goofy Donald Trump memes.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      June 17, 2016

      Mostly, what I see people wasting their time with is just a bunch of goofy Donald Trump memes.

      Well, we can certainly agree on that.

      Like

  4. mark fleagle
    June 16, 2016

    Jews are carrying out their long term agenda…

    “We must realize that our party’s most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negros. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause.” ——– Israel Cohen A Racial Program for the Twentieth Century, 1912. Also in the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957

    Liked by 4 people

  5. Sam J.
    June 16, 2016

    “…When it comes to American politics, immigration is the only issue, it’s all that matters now…”

    Exactly.

    We might propagate the meme that other countries are being abused because White countries are stealing all the diversity. That the lack of diversity is what is causing the 3rd world to fail and of course it’s all White peoples fault.

    Whenever someone promotes diversity throw that line in for giggles if nothing else.

    Like

    • icareviews
      June 16, 2016

      Another approach is to concede that whites are so horrible and so obviously responsible for everything that’s wrong with every country in which they’ve ever lived, that for the common good of the other races, whites should be quarantined to an ethnostate from which people of color, for their own well-being, are barred – same as a leper colony.

      Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 16, 2016

      I get the point, but it won’t work. Anti-whites don’t care one bit about ideological consistency.

      We need to paint them as EVIL. They are anti-white. They are racists that are bigoted against European people. Sure, trolling works and mockery works. But at the end of the day they don’t care.

      The white anti-whites are doing it because it’s a form of social signaling and they get the status as being “moral” and “good” from it. We need to reverse that. Most white anti-whites don’t actually live near diversity and they live completely white lives. It’s all for show.

      We have to find a way to strip that status from them, to make it uncool – to make it WRONG – to be anti-white.

      Like

  6. kerberos616
    June 17, 2016

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

  7. Apollonius
    June 18, 2016

    The more I read about immigration on these “White Nationalist” blogs and sites, the more I feel that this whole discussion is bogus and dead-ended.

    Icareviews says that “White Nationalist Advocacy” should not be a form of entertainment. Well, sir, you have let slip the truth I’m afraid; that’s exactly what it is at this point.

    The Daily Stormer gets something like a million uniques a month, if I recall. It IS the face of “White Nationalism” today, regardless of what you think of it. I happen to find it infuriating and mind-numbingly asinine, but that site sets the cues for most of the other sites. I think Hipster Racist’s description of it as a racist Onion was brilliant. It is essentially a hub for the CONSUMPTION of “pro-white” ephemera items, much as People magazine or the Huffington Post is consumed by absent-minded women. Media is still a big business today, and cheap, titillating crap of every stripe seems to a perennial best-seller, especially in America. It is not surprising that someone would eventually discover a demographic for a politically incorrect, “racist” tabloid genre. It is only natural that the lowest common denominator should be bipartisan and truly accommodating to all tastes in this country.

    There is a small group of intellectuals who style themselves as part of the “New Right” or “Identitarian” reaction that would seem to lend credibility to those people on the side of Anglin and his fellow travellers. But, on closer inspection, such individuals (people like Greg Johnson, Guillaume Faye, Jared Taylor, Colin Liddell, et al.) are incoherent, philosophically dangerous, deceptive, misleading, and ultimately useless. The likes of these men will not even merit a footnote in the history of modern politics.

    What is my point here? I’m getting to that. Now I don’t mean to say that the foregoing personalities have not been right in most of what they say about basic issues like immigration or European exceptionalism. This isn’t really about the particulars. This is about motivation. I read quite a bit of Counter-Currents, Occidental Observer, VDare, this blog, and even Daily Stormer. I am left with one question, to which no one seems to have a good answer, for me, as an ordinary, young white man. The question is, what is the point of all this?

    What am I supposed to feel or do as a consequence of the alleged “White Genocide”? Why should I not simply get on with my life and my career? I read these websites these days as a kind of intellectual recreation. This literature and this work to me, is in the same category as a Sudoku puzzle. In the case of the Daily Stormer, it is more like a Dilbert cartoon. Of course, I am unable to see what any of it has to to do with me.

    I said above that I am referring mostly to the discussion on immigration. I should clarify here a very important fact: I am a Holocaust skeptic, and I was transformed by my first revelations of the truth of this event about ten years ago. I mention this because I was and still am affected deeply by those realizations in a way that the “White Nationalist” movement has never felt to me. I was really led into this whole alternate culture from those initial researches on the Holocaust.

    But the writers and intellectuals above don’t discuss this issue. In fact, they lie about it shamelessly and scandalously. The only issue that seems to animate them at all is brown immigrants. They have nothing interesting to say about philosophy, economics, or practical matters for anyone. They assume that, somehow, our problems would vanish with the deportation of these immigrants. They seem utterly and autistically tendentious with the shrill, tone-deaf posts of “The Mantra”, and they are either blind or unconcerned with regard to the fundamental cultural and spiritual crises of this epoch. I almost think that they talk about immigration because it is easy to understand. They would be just a step up from the Daily Stormer: clickbait operations trafficking in emotionally stimulating racial gossip, albeit of a slightly higher mental calibre. They seem to prefer not to challenge their credulous audience by demanding them to actually think deeply about more abstract concerns. Perhaps they would lose views if they did that.

    As far as I’m concerned, a five year old can understand that mass immigration is a problem. Mass immigration is merely one of many effects of insanity and civilizational crisis that we face today. The fact that they focus on this issue to the exclusion of almost everything else of substance is unacceptable to me. My job is not going to China or to some Mexican immigrant anytime soon. I am not even really affected by the issue. And, in fact, most White people are not. The damage has been done. Immigration (in America) is now at such levels that most White people are not suffering from its most severe effects any longer, and will not be. So called “race replacement” is really the consequence of unprecedented low birthrates among Whites, which, in itself, is a consequence of the aforementioned crisis of world history. And what are we supposed to do when the immigrants are all gone? Then what? I have yet to find a coherent answer from these people.

    Furthermore, who reads these websites? Do you think that regular readers of these sites are not aware of the immigration problem? Do you think that these are people who need to be convinced by long-winded, repetitive articles that Blacks are violent or that non-white immigration is not so great? I am amazed at how many different ways these people can manage to make the same simplistic points. I would ask, “What else do you have to say?”.

    Also, it is not like most ordinary White people need to be convinced of the racial incompatibility issue. There is already a very real, virulent hated of Islam and Muslims among Whites in America, nurtured and stoked lovingly by the Jews. It is not controversial at all in many households to hold dismissive or unfavorable views of non-whites. In fact, one might feel pressured to do so in certain cases. For all the hot air and self-important pontificating about “political correctness”, most average White people in this country have no interest or use for such ideas, and most of these people live their lives without regard to them. The serious problems for most White people are not caused by “political correctness” or “White Genocide” or even immigration. So what do these writers and intellectuals do for these people? Honestly? Even as writers, what good comes from preaching to the choir and repeating yourself in a thousand different ways? So really, who cares? It all seems like bullshit that some pundit uses to fill the airtime with on CNN or Fox News. All of it feels so unserious and trivial.

    “Hey, I wonder what’s on tonight? Let’s flip through the channels and see”. This is not so far from the truth for many involved in this “movement”. This is besides all the idiocy and unhinged madness that comes from characters like Heimbach and Anglin in their lifestyles and bizarre play acting.

    The “White Nationalist” movement does not inspire me and does not give me any reason to care about the White race.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 18, 2016

      The Daily Stormer gets something like a million uniques a month, if I recall. It IS the face of “White Nationalism” today, regardless of what you think of it

      The Daily Stormer is popular for the same reason that 4Chan was popular – it is a place for introverted teenage boys to post “naughty” things anonymously. It is not taken seriously by anyone except for the SPLC and the ADL, who want to make it the “face” of White Nationalism – that is also why they probably fund it.

      But I do agree with a lot of your criticism about the “movement” in general.

      Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 18, 2016

      This, however, is simply false:

      So called “race replacement” is really the consequence of unprecedented low birthrates among Whites

      No, race replacement is the consequence of a policy of race replacement. Whites cannot and should not try to “outbreed” the rest of the world. All we need is to restrict immigration, which is both a political and a meta-political problem.

      The serious problems for most White people are not caused by “political correctness” or “White Genocide” or even immigration.

      Well, I certainly disagree. Those are the serious problems. The “Holocaust” does not affect me at all, but mass immigration and political correctness most certainly do.

      Like

      • Apollonius
        June 18, 2016

        Well, you might just be right about the Daily Stormer being an ADL outfit. It certainly wouldn’t surprise me. But then, Anglin might really be that stupid! Who the hell can tell the difference these days?

        It may not be taken seriously by the AmRen wing of White Nationalism, but most public expressions of that point of view (trolling incidents, honourable mention on Breitbart, Fox News, etc.) originate from DS and its cohorts and not from the intellectuals. There will inevitably be a stain of association.

        And what does the AmRen crowd stand for any way? Who would you really prefer as the “face of White Nationalism”? I give two thumbs down to both options.

        Yes, there are of course people (mostly Jews, but even a few Whites) who want to exterminate the White race. And yes, the immigration law was devised with this goal in mind. But it is turning out to be a rather inefficient method of genocide.

        Since 1965, 72 million immigrants and their descendants have come to America, pushing the White percentage down to 77% (62% excluding Hispanic Whites) from 90%. The White population in the absence of this event would have been about 200 million, and the whole population 252 million. Actually, the current White population is about 200 million, but there are more immigrants now. The White population grew over this period, so immigrants could not outnumber us, even with higher average birthrates.

        Over the next 50 years, 103 million immigrants and their descendants are projected to increase the population. Whites are now at sub-replacement birthrates, so that population will decline, and become a minority by 2065 under these assumptions.

        Now, very roughly, if Whites maintained a birthrate of 3.01 children per woman, a birthrate that was typical from 1946-1956, their population would about double in 50 years to 400 million, thus offsetting all the gains made by immigrants, and then some. A slightly lower birthrate would allow the current population balance to remain constant. Thus, the demographic decline of Whites is due largely to low birthrates, and exacerbated by mass immigration.

        Furthermore, it appears that illegal immigration is down by almost 70% since 2000. In 2000, 1.6 million illegals were apprehended at the border, and in 2012, 400,000 were. The economic crisis has apparently not only reduced illegal immigration, but also lowered the birthrates of Hispanic women in America, though they are still higher than those of White women. It is certainly possible that lower birthrates overseas, even in Latin America, would mean that the above projections are overestimates. In any event, short-term net immigration has declined by quite a bit, and is less disruptive as a result. We almost certainly will not be seeing numbers like we did 10-15 years ago. So, the immigration “problem” for the average White man, appears to have actually gotten better.

        Even under the above projections, Whites would be about 45% of the population by 2065, again this decline due largely to low birthrates. This can hardly be called a genocide, even if the Jews and the liberals want it to be. So excuse me if I am unmoved by the hysterical cries about “White Genocide”. This is not South Africa. Or even Europe. Things will probably be better here than most anywhere else in the First World for the foreseeable future.

        Now, it should go without saying that I support restrictions on immigration. And I certainly would prefer low birthrates, low immigration, and high White proportions. The purpose of the above demonstration was simply to show that this problem, as I indeed described it, is not affecting most people that badly anymore, so the degree of attention given to this issue by the “White Nationalist” press (if there is such a thing) is not justified considering that this issue is simply an effect and not a cause of the real problems. And since I have not heard anyone publicize this information, I can only assume that they don’t want to know about it because they are obsessed with this topic to the exclusion of everything else, as I said. This is a problem.

        It goes to the more general issue of misdirection and deception in this movement. There is undeniably a current of entryism and outright subversion to focus our attention on abstractions like Islam and “liberalism”, and to direct the emotional impetus to the cause of kicking out the immigrants (Jews excluded, of course) and ignoring the political, social, and economic power networks that caused it all in the first place. All of this is a Kosher trick, one of many in the Jewish repertoire, and many people are only too eager to be fooled.

        If Greg Johnson is unable to bring himself to denounce Judaism as the only real enemy and to cease his confusing and disorienting lies about the Holocaust and 9/11, then he is worse than useless. Instead, he returns our attention to the Muslims and the Mexicans. Can you see how subversive this is? He is, of course, not alone in engaging in these practices.

        Like

      • Apollonius
        June 19, 2016

        “Well, I certainly disagree. Those are the serious problems. The “Holocaust” does not affect me at all, but mass immigration and political correctness most certainly do.”

        I was afraid you would say something like that. How exactly are you affected by political correctness? And by immigration? Aren’t you out of the country, currently?

        The Holocaust matters in number of ways. There is a reason that Anglin is the only one who will even mention it. I have used it as a litmus test for years, and I have been proven right every time, with the exception of Anglin.

        Like

  8. Hipster Racist
    June 19, 2016

    If Greg Johnson is unable to bring himself to denounce Judaism as the only real enemy

    That is an absurd characterization of Greg Johnson, considering he is absolutely consistent on the Jewish Problem. I have many criticisms of Greg Johnson, but no one can legitimately criticize him on that. He has consistently said that Jews are the “main enemy” and the most important factor in anti-whiteness.

    So I have no idea where you are getting that from.

    Also, White people have ALWAYS been a global minority. We will probably ALWAYS be a global minority. So that isn’t even an issue. We conquered the world as a minority and we will continue to survive as a minority.

    Sure, it would be better if we had our own nations, but even as a minority in nations, we will still survive.

    So your pessimism is unwarranted.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Hipster Racist
    June 19, 2016

    How exactly are you affected by political correctness? And by immigration? Aren’t you out of the country, currently?

    I mean … I don’t even. Are you serious? My entire extended family – and my people – are in America. Of course immigration and political correctness affect us.

    The Holocaust matters in number of ways.

    No, it does not. 9/11 is far more important of a political issue than “the Holocaust.”

    There is a reason that Anglin is the only one who will even mention it.

    Obviously, that is because Anglin is paid by the SPLC and the ADL to blather on about “the Holocaust” as opposed to important historical issues like 9/11 or OKC.

    I have used it as a litmus test for years, and I have been proven right every time, with the exception of Anglin.

    Anglin and the Daily Stormer trolls are teenage boys who masturbate to anime and Hitler cartoons.

    Come back when you have white children.

    Like

    • Apollonius
      June 24, 2016

      Sorry for getting back to you late on this one…

      First, you did not answer my question about how you are affected by political correctness and immigration. I and my entire family are here as well, and these issues are, for the most part, not relevant to our daily lives in any way that matters. I suppose your example of forced integration in bathrooms would count for political correctness, but that is not what is usually meant by that term. How exactly would you define “Political Correctness”? I may well be wrong about it, after all.

      And yes, the Holocaust does matter. I am afraid this could turn into another long post, but I’ll try to be succinct. The “Holocaust” is the event which defines the moral universe for everyone in the modern world. The lies, the accusations, the “logical” ends, every outcome of this event frames and forces our lives in some way.

      This must be understood as a primarily metaphysical phenomenon. The Holocaust is to be understood at a factual level and at a thematic level, the same way you would consider the effect of any other myth. And in the modern world where God is dead, the Myth of the Twentieth Century must fill the moral void to ensure that the necessary human impulses for mass action can be conjured and channeled and stoked for the benefit of the ruling powers. This would not be possible without a defining narrative to give meaning to such actions. How many actions, how many crimes, how many atrocities were justified because we were fighting the “next Hitler”? How many common-sense notions and traditional institutions were discredited because we had to “Never Forget” what happens when White people decide to determine their own destiny?

      This myth is the original source of White Guilt. The accusation that the traditional, Christian societies of Europe carried out and allowed the greatest atrocity in the history of the world to occur is deeply subversive. Everything since then has followed from this accusation. I repudiate this accusation and all its implications.

      Furthermore, this issue lies at the confluence of crucial questions of ethics, history, epistemology, politics, chemistry, even logic. I have found that people who cannot or will not understand this fail to apprehend the true nature of life in the Twenty-first Century. The whole spiritual or philosophical mode of existence in this era is possible because of this myth. There would no such thing as “Postmodernism” or nihilism as we understand it without this myth. Many people sometimes liken their lives to tumbleweeds in the wind. Well, the idea that this is even an acceptable possibility is rooted in the metaphysical consequences of the Holocaust.

      I suspect I’m losing you at this point, but I beg just a little more of your patience. You must understand that the Holocaust is also the myth that makes possible the undoing of everything I just described. The postmodern negation of absolutes is self-defeating in theory and in fact. In fact, the Holocaust is an absolute LIE. And exposing this fact leads one to the realization of the absolute truth that this myth is an absolute lie. The philosophical foundation for modern life is thus destroyed. From here one can begin the way to learning the truth about many other things.

      Importantly, with few exceptions, one can determine who is lying and who is not by asking them about this issue. You might not believe it, but I can assure you that this question is that revealing.

      To continue, one cannot really understand the Jewish Question without studying the Holocaust. Most Europeans have an instinctive awareness of the Jews as an alien element, but this idea is bizarre to most Americans UNTIL they study the Holocaust. This certainly is how it was for me. This issue makes crystal clear how pervasive Jewish influence is throughout society and that there such a thing as a “Jewish Agenda” and that Jews can actually lie in an almost supernatural way. Then, when you find out that it is ILLEGAL to question their lies, that puts everything in a completely different light. One can only truly understand the stakes of the historical struggle after studying this issue.

      And, as I said, it is more than mere politics. Make no mistake, this is a MORAL issue as well. In several countries, it takes real courage to debate and discuss this issue honestly. People have been impoverished, attacked, beaten, and even killed for bringing it up. And when young men (and women!) are sent to die halfway around the world to reenact the mythical drama of the “Good War”, perhaps this is not merely an academic issue. Especially when the ones calling the shots are same ones who invented the myth and many others. Especially when they are still engaging in the same deception, the same perversion of reality, and the same campaigns against truth-seekers.

      This situation is so Orwellian in so many ways, Orwell was a true prophet of the modern world. Every time I think about it, my head spins. The fact that any of this was possible just overwhelms me. It is all just so bizarre and nightmarish.

      I’ll tell you more. I used to be basically an atheist before I knew any of this. i was led back to religion because of what I learned. I don’t think there is any other way to come to terms with these realizations. Our lives are enmeshed in lies on multiple levels, and extricating ourselves is no easy task. I have found that there is a way out, but it is not obvious or straightforward.

      You might balk or even laugh at much of this. I hope not, but you might have different ideas. It is not easy to explain this to most people, and it really can only be understood if you yourself undergo a similar intellectual experience. Perhaps you can relate to it. i tried to be as clear as I could here.

      Also, I should like to clarify that 9/11 is important for much of the same reasons as the Holocaust. In fact, in many ways, they stand and fall together…the Twin Towers of Modern Illusion if you will. You might find this video pertinent to that point.

      Also, everything you said about Anglin is true.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 24, 2016

        1. Holocaust culture really took off in the 1970s and peaked in the 1990s. At that point, even Seinfeld was making jokes about Schindler’s list. The Holocaust no longer defines the moral universe. If anything, the Downfall parody videos on youtube buried Holocaust culture once and for all. At least in America, no one cares. It’s a page in the history books.

        For any pro-white movement, a major problem is Hitler fetishists who want to bore everyone to tears talking about World War II. Pat Buchanan wrote a great book. Of course, revisionism should be legal and it’s an important field of historical research. But it really has little to do with our issues today.

        2. The pro-white movement isn’t here to give you a reason to live or something. If you don’t care about the future of white people, that’s you problem. We’re here to stop immigration, to defang anti-white slurs like “racist” and to create a future for white children. If you want to help with those goals, great.

        Like

  10. Apollonius
    June 24, 2016

    Well, I think that kind of misses the point of what I was saying. I was specific in saying that the consequences and historical effects of the Holocaust are what matter more than the literal myth. This is not something that should be taken or understood at face value.

    Popular culture may trivialize the actual history (as it does everything), but we are still living in a “post-war reality”, if you know what I mean. The fundamental metahistorical conflicts that caused the Second World War have NOT been resolved. The same forces are at work today. History does not cease to matter just because people forget about it, or laugh about it.

    For a certain class of intellectuals, the Holocaust does still define the moral universe. It doesn’t matter to the common people because, in 2016, they no longer live in a moral universe. They live in TV Land. Guess who runs TV Land? Guess why we’re not allowed to mention it?

    People may have forgotten about the Holocaust, but the Holocaust has not forgotten about them. Our lives are framed by the same Jewish lies, and we are oppressed by the same Hegemonic forces that have reigned since 1945, at least. You have to consider what is actually happening under the surface. A great book to understand this issue from my perspective if I haven’t explained it would be Nick Kollerstrom’s “Breaking the Spell”.

    And how are you supposed to change things politically if you do not understand how and WHY we got here in the first place? Why should anyone listen to you if you are just another minority voice in the multicultural, global democracy that America sustains? If your agenda has no historical legitimacy, what makes it any different from the Blacks who want reparations for slavery from Whites whose ancestors had nothing to do with slavery? As I said above, one gains a deep understanding of not only politics, but history, ethics, and philosophy in studying the phenomenon of the “Holocaust”. Such study furnishes the foundation for a coherent worldview that can serve as the basis for organized political, social, or cultural struggles. And these struggles would hold more than political meaning for its participants.

    And if you really want to get to the heart of it, why shouldn’t the “pro-White” movement give me a reason to live? Why should you, or I care about the future of White people? How many people do you really think are willing to sacrifice anything in real life just so that White people aren’t called “racist” anymore? Materially, I’m not doing too badly. If there is no good reason for me to care, than I have other things to do. Why do YOU care? Judging from your, uh, “non-academic” work, you certainly have plenty of other more interesting things to do in life, so why bother yourself with all this?

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 24, 2016

      why shouldn’t the “pro-White” movement give me a reason to live?

      Why should they? We can’t save everyone, and certainly have no time to waste on people who see no reason to live.

      than I have other things to do.

      You don’t seem particularly useful to the pro-white movement anyway, so.

      why bother yourself with all this?

      I have my reasons.

      Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 24, 2016

      Such study furnishes the foundation for a coherent worldview that can serve as the basis for organized political, social, or cultural struggles.

      It doesn’t. The study of the Holocaust is not the same as understanding Jewish power and revisionism certainly does not furnish a foundation for a coherent world view. It’s historical fetishism.

      Greg Johnson of Counter Currents has discussed the before.

      Like

  11. Apollonius
    June 25, 2016

    I am fed up with Johnson and his disingenuous evasions. He is an academic who pretends to be an activist, but who really just wants to be a boutique book publisher. I don’t care what he says, I can tell that he is all but lukewarm on all issues except for immigration and the “Männerbund”. This is what motivates him. He is a liberal who doesn’t want to sip his pressed juices with dirty brown people. To have a childless, middle-aged, homosexual lecture White people on preventing the extinction of the White race is the height of irony.

    I am not a “historical fetishist”, whatever the hell that is. I don’t run around with armbands and jackboots. I actually would’ve given Hitler a mixed review, if truth be told. Johnson deploys that fatuous insult to spoil perfectly sound and sincere efforts to explain the historical reality and the depth of the current crisis. He pays lip service to the Jewish discussion, but 9/11 was really a Muslim conspiracy, and Hitler really did gas some Jews, in his world. He even once said in an article, if I recall, “Regardless of what revisionists will conclude, there was enough of a Holocaust to make the debate moot.”, or something to that effect.

    He sabotages the analysis by dismissing debate about the actual crimes that show Jewish treachery, and then he mentions Jews only to give himself cover when he’s called out. He is a master of misdirection.

    I can also see that you think blithely dismissing my questions is an acceptable response. You have not refuted any of my points.

    “I have my reasons.”

    Please, do tell.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      June 25, 2016

      He pays lip service to the Jewish discussion

      One can only assume you actually haven’t read Johnson at all, because that is an absurd characterization of him. He has never downplayed the Jewish problem, and in fact, called them the “main enemy.”

      I can also see that you think blithely dismissing my questions is an acceptable response.

      Yes. You are long winded, hostile, and have a strange agenda. Frankly, I think you’re a Jew. You want to ignore immigration, political correctness (anti-whiteness) and instead focus on the Holocaust/Nazis etc.

      Exactly what the SPLC wants. Didn’t you even say that Anglin is the “face of WN?”

      Like

      • Apollonius
        June 26, 2016

        I have read more than enough of Johnson’s work to know what I am talking about.

        Just because someone mentions the word “Jew” doesn’t mean they are going to discuss the issue in an insightful or illuminating way. Very often in fact, it is to obfuscate and deflect. I already explained Johnson’s MO in this regard.

        You seem not to be aware of Johnson’s well-known duplicity in the “New Right” community. His departure from Occidental Observer (or Dissent?) was a bit of a scandal. Alex Linder has stories that might interest you.

        Anglin is also a perfect example of how discussion of the Jewish question can be discredited and muddled. Every time he brings it up, he makes the rest of us look worse. I didn’t mean to say that I wanted him to be the face of White Nationalism, I meant that he overshadows all the other WN websites by sheer numbers. This is not a good thing, but you cannot deny that this is the case. Am I a Jew simply for pointing this out?

        And I was clear about my opinions on immigration. I am against it. But talking about it incessantly to the exclusion of all other issues is going to get you exactly nowhere. It is an issue that has, as you like to put it, a 100% failure rate of political success. If you want to build a political movement, “pro-White” is simply not going to cut it. Most White people don’t think in those terms and have no desire to. You need something more. Immigration does not motivate anybody to do much beyond casting a ballot for some Republican. You have not addressed this concern, which I brought up previously.

        “You are long winded, hostile, and have a strange agenda.”

        What’s hostile? I think I have been reasonable with you. And no, I am not a Jew.

        Liked by 1 person

  12. cartiermccloud
    June 26, 2016

    Damn well said, Apollonius. Hipster loves to criticize but cannot take it himself. He made some snide remarks about my site without identifying me so I answered him above. He has yet to respond. Condemning a site over one post is sheer laziness.

    I don’t care to get into this argument between you two. Discussions of “right,” alt-right” this “right,” libs, progressives, or this or that one is a waste of time. Everyone knows where I stand on the White Race and the jews from both my sites.

    Our enemy is clear; we need to focus on destroying them instead of fussing among ourselves. We’re running out of time.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 26, 2016

      I was being polite by not responding. You were justifying yourself posting homosexual pornography. If I was posting lesbian pornography on my site, and made some sort of “excuse” about it, no one would take it seriously.

      Apollonius showed up, said we’re all wasting our time, the white nationalist movement sucks, and we should instead focus on the Holocaust, because that is what is important. Not mass non-white immigration. Not “political correctness” (i.e., anti-whiteness.)

      No, the Holocaust. He wants the entire “movement” to be based around the Holocaust.

      If you and Apollonius want to post gay pornography and jerk-off to Hitler and Holocaust stuff – go to the Daily Stormer. They are into that sort of thing.

      Like

      • cartiermccloud
        June 26, 2016

        As usual, you have not bothered to read why I posted that article, whose pictures you are not intelligent enough to get beyond. As for WWII, Hitler and the holohoax, exposing the truth of this watershed point in history effectively destroys all the lies the stinking jews depend on and marks them clearly as our enemy.

        Some blogs use the holohoax, others Hitler, others WWII, others the denigration of our culture, etc to make their points. You have your own way. As do I.

        Apollonius clearly makes his point without resorting to insults and mis-direction. Take a lesson, sweetheart.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 26, 2016

        , exposing the truth of this watershed point in history effectively destroys all the lies the stinking jews depend on and marks them clearly as our enemy.

        Except it doesn’t. People like you have spent 40 years blathering on about Hitler and the Holocaust, and all you have done is give fodder for our enemies.

        You tried, and you failed. Most white people don’t care about the Holocaust. Hitler was 70 years ago – in Germany, not the US. Your fetish for him just makes you look like a loon and normal white people don’t want anything to do with you.

        If you want to post gay pornography and circle-jerk about Hitler – go to the Daily Stormer, or any other ADL run website. There are plenty.

        Like

      • cartiermccloud
        June 26, 2016

        Listen, kid, I’ve taken on bigger fish than you, including John Kaminski, Kyle Hunt, Michael Walsh, Darkmoon and the rest of the blithering idiots at Renegade. In fact, I’ve been banned from commenting on both sites. I consider it a badge of honor.

        As for your insulting response to Apollonius, I rest my case.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 26, 2016

        John Kaminski, Kyle Hunt, Michael Walsh

        Oh, you have “taken on” people like Kyle Hunt – he is the guy that says “Jew-run science” is tricking us into believing the earth is round, when it is really flat?

        Those are the kind of people you engage? Interesting.

        Like

      • Apollonius
        June 26, 2016

        Who’s being hostile now?

        I don’t believe I ever said that we should base the movement on the Holocaust. You said it didn’t matter. I explained why it does. Don’t put words in my mouth. There are many important issues, and the Holocaust is a notable one, but not the only one.

        Now, just out of curiosity, do you have anything more to offer than puerile insults and arrogant dismissals? As it stands, I am winning this exchange by default.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        June 26, 2016

        You said you don’t care about immigration, or political correctness (anti-whiteness) and have no reason to care about white people.

        But the Holocaust is what inspired you.

        Then, you went on to trash every serious intellectual in the movement, while suggesting that their failure lent credibility to … Andrew Anglin, of the Daily Stormer.

        I mean, your comments are still there. Anyone can read them.

        I am winning this exchange by default.

        Now I am even more certain you are a Jew. I assume you followed the links for reddit – that is when you showed up, right when I was targeted by the hasbara crowd.

        What exactly is your point? Why are you here? Why are you posting on a thread of mine?

        You said you have no reason to care about white people. You said that the “movement” sucks. You said the Holocaust is what inspires you.

        You aren’t “winning” any exchange, because I’m not going to tailgate you. You haven’t given me any reason to care about your opinions yet.

        Like

      • cartiermccloud
        June 26, 2016

        That’s why I took him on. I was collaborating with Walsh on some work and was reading his articles there when I came across that one.

        Come on, sweetheart, you can do better then this:P

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 26, 2016

        I don’t see why you are wasting your time with me.

        Wouldn’t your time be better spent posting hardcore homosexual pornography, fantasizing about Hitler, and debunking trolls like Kyle Hunt who say the earth it flat?

        I generally write about the interests of white people.

        Like

  13. Hipster Racist
    June 26, 2016

    You seem not to be aware of Johnson’s well-known duplicity in the “New Right” community. His departure from Occidental Observer (or Dissent?) was a bit of a scandal. Alex Linder has stories that might interest you.

    Now I KNOW you are a troll. I have discussed that on my own blog a year ago, in depth.

    As far as Alex Linder goes – if you want to spend time talking about mass murder, genocide, Hitler and the Nazis, how you want to murder Jewish babies, and otherwise act as a paid “neo-Naaazi” for the ADL and the SPLC – go right ahead. Somewhere else.

    Perhaps you can join the NSM, or TradYouth, and parade around in front of the cameras and talk about how you want to lynch people.

    We’ve discussed those issues many, many times. We have rejected playing Costume Clown for the ADL.

    You aren’t going to convince anyone here of any of that.

    If you want to build a political movement, “pro-White” is simply not going to cut it. Most White people don’t think in those terms and have no desire to.

    This issue has been discussed on this very blog, numerous times, and has in fact referenced Kevin MacDonald’s work on the psychology of European peoples. Did you read it?

    You need something more. Immigration does not motivate anybody

    Your “solution” is to talk about the Holocaust and Hitler. And whatever the hell Alex Linder thinks he is doing. That isn’t a “solution” – it is making the problem worse.

    You have literally said that the Holocaust is your main issue, or what “woke you up.”

    I am a Holocaust skeptic, and I was transformed by my first revelations of the truth of this event about ten years ago. I mention this because I was and still am affected deeply by those realizations in a way that the “White Nationalist” movement has never felt to me. I was really led into this whole alternate culture from those initial researches on the Holocaust.

    You trash every intellectual in the movement, suggest that their shortcomings give Anglin some credibility, and that you have no reason to care about white people – except something something Holocaust.

    You sure as hell sound like a Jew to me. You sound like a typical Joshua Goldberg/Frances Cohen “nazi” type.

    You are going to have to try a lot harder to fool anyone here.

    Like

    • Apollonius
      June 26, 2016

      “…suggest that their shortcomings give Anglin some credibility…”

      Anglin has said that he and Johnson share the same goals and differ only on the methods. And Johnson did not appear to dispute this. The only real distinction between Anglin’s “message” (insofar as it exists) and that of the intellectuals I mentioned is one of presentation. The essential focus points are pretty much the same.

      I never I said I didn’t care about White People. I said the White Nationalist movement doesn’t give me a reason to care. I also said “IF there is no good reason for me to care, than I have other things to do”. I actually do care, but not because I was persuaded by the charisma or dignity of such sterling “men” as Anglin or Johnson.

      I also am no fan of Alex LInder. But LInder exposed certain damning facts about Johnson that cannot be ignored. And his claims about him seem credible to me. Are you really going to put yourself in the position of having to shill for Greg Johnson?

      And you are falsely associating me with “Nazis” when I was only discussing revisionism. I very clearly said above that I’m no Hitler worshiper.

      “You sure as hell sound like a Jew to me.”

      Well your Jewdar must be in need of a tune-up if you can’t distinguish between honest criticism and trolling.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        June 26, 2016

        Anglin has said that he and Johnson share the same goals and differ only on the methods.

        As usual, Anglin is wrong. Johnson is a legitimate white advocate, absolutely solid on the Jew problem, and is an excellent editor. I have criticized Johnson quite often for what I perceive to be his shortcomings and biases, but have always acknowledged him as a net positive.

        Anglin is a race-mixing clown – almost certainly being paid by the ADL – whose job it is to defame the pro-white movement and slur people like Johnson, MacDonald, and Spencer via guilt-by-association.

        To even put Anglin in the same sentence as any of those people is an insult to them.

        I question the sincerity of anyone who considers Anglin as anything other than a race-mixing clown who is being paid to defame the pro-white movement. The fact that he is usually the focus of anti-white hit pieces in the media shows it. Every single time a jew journalist wants to smear someone like Johnson, MacDonald, or Spencer, the very first thing they do is to try to associate them with Anglin.

        Anglin, himself, tries to associate those people with his ADL-funded clown corral.

        I also am no fan of Alex LInder. But LInder exposed certain damning facts about Johnson that cannot be ignored.

        Alex Linder is nothing more than an unfunny version of Anglin. Linder’s agenda became clear when he hijacked Hunter Wallace on a podcast and tried to berate him into saying he would murder Jewish babies. Linder is no advocate for white people. Linder is yet another “neo-naaaaazi” being paid by the ADL/SPLC in order to defame white people. For all of Johnson’s faults, he is a net positive to the movement, while Linder is a net negative.

        BTW, you still sound like a Jew to me. You engage in Jewish pilpul, you attack credible white advocates while promoting ADL/SPLC shills like Anglin and Linder. That is exactly what a Jew would do. So, as of now, I assume you are yet another Joshua Goldberg permutation.

        Like

  14. cartiermccloud
    June 26, 2016

    I, too, write about the survival of my White Race:

    https://standordie.wordpress.com/2015/06/21/the-death-of-the-white-race/

    I bothered with Hunt because far too many people admire Renegade and I always try to set the record straight.

    Like

  15. Apollonius
    June 26, 2016

    “Why are you here?”

    If you’re going to have a blog open to comments from readers, than I assume that you expect to receive questions or comments that are sometimes critical.

    I had several concerns about this movement, and I was fair in raising them here. If you had any good answers, I would have been very keen to know them. This was just a discussion about the issues, or at least I hoped it would be.

    Even if I were a troll, you admitted that I made some good points. Surely, I raised questions that demand some response, no? I happen to agree with a lot of what you say in general, and I wasn’t even criticizing you. So why the hostility?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      June 26, 2016

      I read your comments, agreed with some of your points, and disagreed with other points.

      Then, you decided to make this a “competition” and declared yourself the “winner” – in other words, you engaged in pilpul, like a Jew.

      You spent most of your time trashing credible white advocates while taking the side of ADL/SPLC trolls like Anglin and Linder. You, in fact, used Linder’s line of attack against Greg Johnson …

      Who even brought up Johnson? He isn’t even relevant to the article. I don’t even remember quoting him. So why in the world would Johnson’s personal life – or even his drama about Occidental Dissent – be brought up?

      It was brought up because you wanted to:

      1. Engage in Jew pilpul.

      2. Trash all credible white advocates.

      3. Try to associate pro-white people with the Holocaust, Hitler, Nazis, etc.

      Like

      • Apollonius
        June 26, 2016

        I brought up Johnson in the context of a more general complaint about this movement. YOU were the one who leapt to his defense.

        “Jew Pilpul”

        LOL, how am I supposed to respond to that?

        “Trash all credible White advocates”

        As far as Johnson is concerned, my trashcan is too good for him. Why are those other people “credible” to you anyway? Name one White person whose life was improved by any of these people.

        “Try to associate pro-white people with the Holocaust, Hitler, Nazis, etc.”

        Why are you so afraid of this subject? Don’t you realize by now that it is going to come up no matter what you do? Anyone not wholly cucked or Judaized is a Nazi or potential Nazi to our enemies. Why let them have that line of attack so flimsy and devoid of any truth or merit? Why not hit them back hard by showing them as the liars and murderers that they are? Turn the tables on them. Accuse THEM of being the guilty ones. They lose every honest debate on this issue SO BADLY. That is why it is illegal to even question it. The Big Lie is too great to ignore. And exposing it is in fact to our benefit in so many ways that I am amazed that anyone would want to neglect simply discussing it.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        June 26, 2016

        Dont you realize by now that it is going to come up no matter what you do?

        This is Anglin’s line. “They are going to call you a Nazi anyway, so therefore, we should be Nazis.”

        I don’t care about the Holocaust. It isn’t important. I don’t care about Hitler or the Nazis. They aren’t important.

        What is important?

        Mass non-white immigration. Political correctness/anti-whiteness. White genocide.

        ALL the issues you say aren’t important – because you want to talk about Hitler and the Holocaust.

        And exposing it is in fact to our benefit in so many ways that I am amazed that anyone would want to neglect simply discussing it.

        Stop talking about mass immigration! Stop talking about anti-whiteness and political correctness! Stop talking about white genocide!

        Start dressing up in Nazi costumes and debunk the Holocaust! That is what is important!

        He’s more kosher than a mid-town deli.

        Like

  16. Apollonius
    June 26, 2016

    “Anglin is a race-mixing clown – almost certainly being paid by the ADL – whose job it is to defame the pro-white movement and slur people like Johnson, MacDonald, and Spencer via guilt-by-association.”

    The association is there whether you like it or not. Johnson himself criticized Colin Liddell for making the same accusations about him that you are now making. Not that I’m defending him, but Johnson and Anglin are not as far apart in essence as you are implying.

    Say what you want about Linder, but Johnson never really denied his claims about him. As far I can tell, Johnson was just being evasive. He is clearly a dishonest and dishonorable individual. I might even say that I would question the sincerity of anyone who would leap to his defense.

    And how can you construe anything I said here as promotion for Anglin or Linder? I personally disavow them both, That doesn’t mean that every word out of their mouths is a lie or a piece of trolling.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      June 26, 2016

      Johnson himself criticized Colin Liddell for making the same accusations about him that you are now making.

      You didn’t read that whole exchange. Liddell was making a point with that article – and Johnson himself, in the comment section, acknowledged he didn’t get it at first.

      Not that I’m defending him, but Johnson and Anglin are not as far apart in essence as you are implying.

      Here he goes again, trying to smear credible white advocates as “guilty-by-association” with Anglin …

      Say what you want about Linder, but Johnson never really denied his claims about him.

      Here he goes again – using Linder in order to attack credible pro-white advocates like Johnson.

      Like

  17. Hipster Racist
    June 26, 2016

    I am left with one question, to which no one seems to have a good answer, for me, as an ordinary, young white man. The question is, what is the point of all this?

    He’s an ordinary “young” white man – that “just happens” to have detailed knowledge of the pro-white movement – including all the negative drama about people like Johnson. He sees “no point” in all of this.

    I said above that I am referring mostly to the discussion on immigration. I should clarify here a very important fact: I am a Holocaust skeptic, and I was transformed by my first revelations of the truth of this event about ten years ago. I mention this because I was and still am affected deeply by those realizations in a way that the ‘White Nationalist’ movement has never felt to me.

    What am I supposed to feel or do as a consequence of the alleged ‘White Genocide’?

    Why should anyone care about mass non-white immigration into white countries or “alleged” white genocide? Why should anyone care about political correctness (i.e., anti-whiteness)? The Holocaust is the real motivating factor.

    But, on closer inspection, such individuals (people like Greg Johnson, Guillaume Faye, Jared Taylor, Colin Liddell, et al.) are incoherent, philosophically dangerous, deceptive, misleading, and ultimately useless.

    Everyone in the pro-white movement is “incoherent, philosophically dangerous, deceptive, misleading, and ultimately useless.” Also, have you read this personal drama about Greg Johnson?

    But the writers and intellectuals above don’t discuss this issue. In fact, they lie about it shamelessly and scandalously. The only issue that seems to animate them at all is brown immigrants.

    The problem is, all of the credible intellectuals in the pro-white movement are talking about mass immigration too much – and aren’t spending enough time talking about … the Holocaust. Forget the importation of millions of non-whites into white countries. What we should be focusing on is how some Jew lied about escaping a gas chamber.

    They seem utterly and autistically tendentious with the shrill, tone-deaf posts of ‘The Mantra’

    The most effective pro-white talking points of the last decade are “shrill” and “tone-deaf.” Mantra talking points are focusing on anti-whiteness and how non-whites are being imported into white countries – and only white countries. Talking about that is “shrill” and “tone-deaf.”

    We should instead be talking about the Holocaust and Hitler.

    The fact that they focus on this issue to the exclusion of almost everything else of substance is unacceptable to me. My job is not going to China or to some Mexican immigrant anytime soon. I am not even really affected by the issue.

    “Only losers are effected by mass immigration. My job is secure. So what if millions of non-whites are imported into white countries, and only white countries? Real intellectuals like me want to talk about the Holocaust.”

    This is, of course, the standard left-wing talking point about immigration.

    The serious problems for most White people are not caused by ‘political correctness’ or ‘White Genocide’ or even immigration.

    Forget about anti-whiteness, white genocide, or even immigration. Who cares? So what? The Holocaust is the important issues, and all the intellectuals are not spending enough time talking about the Holocaust.

    The ‘White Nationalist’ movement does not inspire me and does not give me any reason to care about the White race.

    That’s because he’s a Jew.

    I was afraid you would say something like that. How exactly are you affected by political correctness? And by immigration? Aren’t you out of the country, currently?

    A Jew who has been following us for some time, apparently.

    Like

  18. Hipster Racist
    June 26, 2016

    Let’s see:

    1. He doesn’t think mass immigration is an important issue.

    2. He doesn’t think that political correctness (anti-whiteness) is an important issue.

    3. He thinks all the main intellectuals in the movement are “incoherent, philosophically dangerous, deceptive, misleading, and ultimately useless.”

    4. He thinks Mantra talking points – the most effective pro-white talking points in a generation, written by a professional political propagandist – are “shrill” and “tone deaf.”

    5. He has detailed knowledge of most movement figures – and especially personal drama and accusations – including about where I reside.

    He’s managed to fit every anti-white talking point – and plenty of movement drama – into this thread. This is Concern Trolling 101.

    Smells like gefilte fish to me.

    Like

  19. Hipster Racist
    June 26, 2016

    Ultimately, I could ban Apollonius – but he is such a TEXTBOOK example of a Jew/Joshua Goldberg/Kosher Nazi type it’s worth paying attention to exactly what he is doing.

    Let’s not forget that Joshua Goldberg was featured on the Daily Stormer for a long time – until the FBI caught him impersonating a Muslim and inciting terrorism. Joshua Goldberg’s persona was publicized by Rita Katz and SITE Intelligence.

    Just pay attention to what Apollonius is doing. He wants to distract us from talking about non-white immigration, political correctness/anti-whiteness, and white genocide.

    He trashes every serious intellectual in the movement – using the same talking points as Andrew Anglin and Alex Linder, two known agent provocateurs.

    He suggests that, instead, we should be talking about the Holocaust, and be Nazis.

    Like

  20. Apollonius
    June 26, 2016

    I probably won’t say anything more after this, but I will state a few things for clarity.

    You are clearly incapable of handling criticism as you have not made a single cogent argument against anything I said, and instead, you responded with ridiculous, though amusing insults and non sequiturs. You also evaded all of my direct questions. Your replies amount to little more than “nuh-uh” all the way through. I honestly thought you were smarter than that.

    You act as if I just pulled “concern troll” talking points out of a hat to see what stuck. I am not the only one talking about these issues, and I’m not a troll, but you can’t tell the difference because you are not mentally or emotionally equipped to deal with criticism. Everything you wrote above is so far off the mark, but it is impossible to reason with you.

    I may know more than most about movement intrigue, but I had to be informed because almost no one can be trusted among these vipers. I have heard too many horror stories to simply give people the benefit of the doubt. I consider it to be responsible due diligence. Apparently, you see it fit to abandon prudence when the liars are promoting the agendas you like.

    I now see that you are out of touch with the political and historical reality of the world today.

    I raised valid points. This movement has serious–fatal–problems. It is deeply incoherent, and I don’t think that is accidental. If you think this movement has any future as it is now, you are delusional. I can’t imagine what motivates you as you are clearly a secular decadent, but you will surely come to terms with reality one way or another, as everyone will in the end.

    But, thank you, at least, for what good material that you put out, and for allowing this forum. This was disappointing, but enlightening.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      June 26, 2016

      You are clearly incapable of handling criticism as you have not made a single cogent argument against anything I said. Your replies amount to little more than “nuh-uh” all the way through. I honestly thought you were smarter than that.

      His argumentation style is indistinguishable from a hasbara Jew.

      you are not mentally or emotionally equipped

      Yep, a typical Jewish “debating” tactic.

      Like

  21. cartiermccloud
    June 26, 2016

    I see you’d rather be “right” than informed.

    Take care, Apollonius.

    Like

  22. Hipster Racist
    June 26, 2016

    Just for fun, I looked up where he is posting from. A city that has a nearly 50% Jewish population – it’s quite possible, in fact, that the majority of the non-black people in that city are Jews.

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: