Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Never Give Up

One sometimes encounters despondency in the identitarian ranks. The girth of the David turned Goliath that constitutes the ruling class is of such a magnitude at present that European prospects for regaining sovereignty seem at times to be the stuff of Quixotic phantasmagoria. Zionist tentacles envelop the mass media, governments, multinationals, central banks, and the hearts and minds of much of the public. The future is bleak, brown, and red – what else remains to be said? A single axiom bears repeating in such moments of despair.

While Jewish openness indicates the measure of their security, Jews’ lies measure the size of their fear. A gaudy, gargantuan Jewish ritual rake taunting America from the grounds of the White House is most definitely a show of strength, as are the repeated and casual admissions from various Jewish writers about the Hebraic control of crucial nodes of global influence. Jews’ ubiquitous efforts at maintaining the ruse of the “Holocaust” or of common “Judeo-Christian” values, however, reveal their apprehensions of real repercussions – as opposed, for instance, to the movie Nazi retribution the Chosen always pretend to dread.

National Menorah

As recent controversy surrounding the “anti-Semitic” Twitter (((echo))) identifier illustrates, media Jews engage each other in a perpetual discourse concerning the present status of their continuing hegemony. Writers like Tablet’s Yair Rosenberg, in treating the matter as a joke, appropriating the (((echo))) themselves, and encouraging others to do so, as well, are thereby affirming the certainty of their political ascendancy and their confidence that there is no longer a need for Jewishness to be tactfully tacit, let alone disguised by crypsis as in decades and centuries past.

As Vice reports, “Rosenberg and other prominent Jewish writers started taking back that signal in an effort to raise awareness about what neo-Nazis are doing, to declare publicly that they are indeed Jewish, and to troll the increasingly prominent alt-right.” Clearly, these are a novel breed of smug and pampered parasites, reared without that traditional hate of identification that Joseph Goebbels rendered: “one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: ‘I’ve been found out.’”

Cooper Fleishman and Anthony Smith, in their Tech.Mic article “(((Echoes))), Exposed: The Secret Symbol Neo-Nazis Use to Target Jews Online”, take the opposite and more conventional approach, characterizing the online trend as a harbinger of Hitlerism. Those using the “sinister” (((echo))) are “Neo-Nazis” who want to “put a target on their [i.e., Jews’] heads” for persecution through “death threats, anti-Semitic cartoons, images of concentration camp ovens and executed Jews, threatening emails, even home phone calls.” Tech.Mic, like the ADL, invokes the feigned fear that hides the coercive muscle that Zionist Jews deem necessary to stave off the actual fear of their project’s final collapse.

“God is a concept by which we measure our pain,” ex-Walrus John Lennon famously whimpered on his self-indulgent post-Beatles release John Lennon/Plastic Ono Band. Throat-rippingly appropriating his words like the rabid death-threat-tweeting neo-Nazi attack dogs all of us white guys here on the internet, of course, are, would it not be more instructive than perpetually despairing of the proliferation of Judaic untruth to recognize, rather, in this orgy of lies the adversary’s acknowledgment of our still-dormant potential – the concept by which we measure his fear?

Rainer Chlodwig von Kook

Advertisements

About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

28 comments on “Never Give Up

  1. icareviews
    June 11, 2016

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  2. Hipster Racist
    June 11, 2016

    “The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.”

    Just read the ridiculous purple prose from these Zionist Supremacists:

    neo-Nazi

    WTF is a “neo-Nazi” anyway? Most of the famous “neo-Nazis” since World War II have been Jews playing dress up: Frances Cohen, “Wolfgang Warhammer” or whatever. Even the ADL’s favorite “neo-Nazi” site, the Daily Stormer, actually publishes Jews like Joshua Goldberg also pretending to be “neo-Nazis.” The fact is, there basically are no “neo-Nazis” so Jews have to make them up.

    Target Jews Online

    Oy vey, if some Jew says White people must be “wounded” and someone points out he’s only saying that because he’s a racist, anti-white Zionist Jew, that’s “targeting Jews online.” Apparently, pointing out Jewish Privilege and noticing the racism, bigotry, and ethnic supremacism endemic in the Jewish community is “targeting Jews online.”

    Forget the parentheses – use the word. “Jew Supremacist neo-Zionist Cooper Fleishman racistly attacks innocent European-Americans.”

    “Jew Supremacist website Salon.com dehumanizes European and Palestinian people.”

    It’s really simple, folks. After 100 years of Jewish domination of the mass broadcast media, the internet has started to level the playing field. As we can see, simply the act of NOTICING Jews when they attack Europeans and European-Americans is a threat to their power. They wanted to be able to get away with their racist attacks on Europeans, European-Americans – not to mention Palestinians – without anyone noticing they are not doing so as “white” people – they do so as Jews.

    Pointing out Jewish hatred and bigotry is doing the Lord’s work.

    Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      June 11, 2016

      If there were no chance of our succeeding at righting our course, Jews wouldn’t bother to propagandize us. Palestinians have little to no means of resistance and are therefore butchered at will by Israelis, which is why they don’t bother with lying to them about their shared Judeo-Islamic values or some other horseshit. They choose to kill them because they can do so with impunity. Why bother with lying to them about why they’re doing it? If Zionists thought for a minute that they could get away with open genocide in other parts of the world, they wouldn’t bother saturating the media with so many lies. The fact that they do means they know we still have the means of resistance.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. Hipster Racist
    June 11, 2016

    The funniest part was when some wag decided to define “the meaning” of each set of parentheses.

    The inner parentheses represent the Jewish attack on the family and the community. The middle set of parentheses represents Jewish control of the media and the banks. The outer set of parentheses represents international Zionism.

    LOL!

    Someone had a hilarious time making that up, and apparently, some Jew Supremacist neo-Zionist racist took the bait and actually published that.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. mark fleagle
    June 11, 2016

    Jews control the establishment.

    The good news; Jews are losing their grip…

    The Jewish power in government is being eroded & exposed; AIPAC was dealt a devastating blow when they failed to convince the US to bomb Syria.

    We first noticed Jewish power diminishing in 2013 when AIPAC couldn’t get the US to bomb Syrian chemical stockpiles.

    The source of Jewish power is almost entirely dependent on their strangle hold in forming public opinion through the Main Stream Media (MSM), which is fading fast, and soon their MSM will be obsolete.

    The Jewish paper tiger is about to be torn down.

    Jews brought about their own destruction in the world of finance; parasites always seek a host; when Jews find their host Nation is destabilized to the brink of ruin they begin cannibalizing one another, in an effort to save themselves.

    It will be our job to sit back and watch the carnage…

    Meanwhile the U.S. will fire-up the printing presses and pay the Jews back with their own fiat money.

    Freeing the U.S. of all debt, then the US can turn around and print a Green-back note backed by the power of the electorate.

    Ezra Pound on Money:

    Ezra Pound recognized two very important threats to the international banking community that arose out of the Third Reich. First, Hitler abandoned the gold standard, meaning that…

    Germany suddenly had the power to prevent defaulting on its future debt simply by printing money — a power that in part, the U.S. decided to copy, just as the U.S. copied the autobahns.

    Secondly, and much more importantly, the 3rd Reich took back the power from the central banks by directly financing infrastructure projects, issuing notes in payment to the laborers, contractors, and suppliers rather than first borrowing the money from a central bank at interest.

    Ezra Pound gave us the answer to our currency problem…

    “If the U.S. directly issued its own notes of payment to laborers, contractors, and suppliers rather than first borrowing the notes from the central banks, bankers would be no more powerful than plumbers.” ——- Ezra Pound

    Liked by 2 people

  5. kerberos616
    June 12, 2016

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

  6. kroneprimarius
    June 12, 2016

    I’m rather happy for them to self-apply the cowbell. It may become very handy in the future. That’s the sort of Jewish initiative I appreciate.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Sam J.
    June 12, 2016

    A way to get rid of the Jews central bank is to follow the ideas of Scott Smith. He’s running for president. No I don’t work for him or have any dealings with him I just ran across his ideas surfing the web.

    http://www.scottsmith2016.com/

    His ideas are extremely good. For revenue instead of getting most from income taxes he would get revenue from settlements. Like every time you buy something or deposit a check in the bank, etc. The value of this is it massively raises the tax base so that the amount of each transaction is minuscule. I read, “For Good and Evil: The Impact of Taxes on the Course of Civilization” by Charles Adams a book on taxes and it talked a lot about raising the tax base in order to lower the percentage taken from each transaction and to spread out where revenues came from.

    Let’ look at the numbers he quotes.

    Payrolls total $15 trillion.
    Not much for filling a $4 trillion federal spending.

    The base for what he calls payments, (transactions), is 3,600 Trillion. Big difference. So using this big difference he would only take a tax rate of just 1/8 of a percent.

    He also would stop charging interest as the money is made and backed by the taxpayers. He would only give banks a service fee. (I don’t agree with this. I think a small interest paid to the Federal Gov. would be helpful providing the majority of it went to the treasury and bypassed the FED and banks.)

    He’s got some great ideas on lots of issues. He’ll never get any publicity from the media with his cut out the Jews ideas but they’re worth thinking about. My biggest problem is just how, even with such small percentage of tax, he would keep corporations and the 1% from gaming it so they pay none.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Sam J.
      June 14, 2016

      Another thing Smith wants to do is pay the debt off. He points out that all the debt pays interest so it gets bigger and bigger. There’s a not so evident twist to the debt. Here it is…as soon as the debt is issued it is financialized. It becomes money. It may be debt but in today’s world you can use this promise to pay to raise cash. Therefore the money supply is already inflated by the debt. Get it? Debt becomes cash through financialization.

      He says,”…Coupon stripping would not be inflationary
      because it would replace our existing supply of interest bearing
      money with non-interest-bearing money…”

      When he says coupon stripping he’s talking about the old time bonds. Here’s a picture.

      Each bond has coupons that when torn off at a certain date become money. He says we pay all the bonds off with none interesting bearing CASH now instead of letting the debt inflate further. The bonds have become cash already so it’s not necessarily inflationary to turn them into cash.

      Here’s another quote,”…Ironically, we would have inflated the money
      supply less if we had issued new money to pay for the
      deficit each year rather than selling Treasury bonds. At
      least ordinary money does not accrue interest…”

      That being the case he says we should pay off all debt within five years.

      Here’s a link to his pay off the debt page.

      http://www.scottsmith2016.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Pay-Off-the-Debt.pdf

      I think he’s somewhat right about turning debt into cash not being inflationary but not 100%. Some debt is parked and if they were forced to accept cash I have no doubt they would buy assets for cash causing some inflation. His point over all I believe is sound. That printing cash is less damaging to the economy than continuously expanding debt. Yes there is a limit to this. The damage is less when you have instant inflation that the delayed case of delayed debt. When you have instant feedback from printing cash you also can see the damage and correct it faster. The debt is hidden as it takes some money out of circulation while NOT extinguishing it. When debt is turned to cash it’s influence can’t be stopped as easy.

      We need to realize that THE most potent tool of the Jews is their ability, through owning the FED and banks, to print unlimited cash and lend unlimited cash to their friends. They got the money. Hard not to be successful when your friends will loan you any amount of money you ask for. We need plans to do away with their systems and move them into our favor.

      Like

      • icareviews
        June 14, 2016

        I’m not an economist, but something about the idea of all of “our” debt actually being paid off is infuriating. I’m not suggesting that everybody ought to be hung out to dry, but a lot of America’s creditors belong in maximum security prisons.

        Like

      • Sam J.
        June 14, 2016

        I don’t disagree that a lot of the bankers belong in jail but there’s also a lot of pension funds and little old ladies who hold our debt. As for the bankers we could just wipe out the debt they hold as after all we created the money to give them to buy it. If you look at the link the US gov. owns a lot of the debt and it could just be zeroed out from those accounts.

        The FED is actually doing a lot of what he says by buying debt. The FED owns a large part of our debt. The bad part is they give it too the banks as capital. We shouldn’t give them anything. I would like to see the FED taxed at 10,000% or so wiping them out and giving the taxpayers all their assets.

        Our money system is a scam that could never last. All money created in debt. Doesn’t take serious math to know that if every dollar is created with debt it will eventually compound to where they own everything. The tax part takes it back.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        June 14, 2016

        @Sam J

        Interesting stuff about money. There have been many alternative monetary and tax systems proposed throughout the years. I’ve read the Henry George’s “single tax” ideas were quite mainstream at the time and orthodox economics was essentially invented to marginalize his ideas.

        The computer revolution had a really significant impact on the monetary and financial systems. From Bloomberg terminals in the 1970s, to the Fed replacing their paper check clearing system with computers, to the derivative boom in the 2000s – now bitcoin – the possibilities to have alternative currency systems are endless.

        Money is a social construct. Unfortunately, you have the Ron Paul type people still stuck with the idea of a gold backed currency. They always think in terms of inflation but never realize our current systems can deflate as well. There is no reason we need to have a fixed supply of money.

        One interesting idea too is barter exchanges – with the internet, you can set up barter chains: User A trades Commodity X to User B who trades Commodity Y to User C for Commodity Z. Nest is as deep as you want.

        At the end of the day though, this is not a technical economic issue – it’s a political issue. You know what would be really radical? Having a neighborhood of ten families buy groceries in bulk. Or share an internet connection. Or buy a commuter bus to take them to work. Or just join a credit union.

        Tight knit, cooperative groups are not in the interests of global corporations, thus, the entire culture, regulatory system, and especially the media, are against them.

        Liked by 1 person

  8. Sam J.
    June 12, 2016

    I forgot something. Never Give Up is right. No matter how bad things seem the Jews have been thrown out of EVERY single country they’ve been in any numbers. They’ve always screwed up. I believe personally they are a tribe of psychopaths, not all and maybe not the majority, but a lot. People eventually get so fed up with psychopaths, the Jews for instance, they will do anything to get rid of them. Germany was much more controlled than we are now and didn’t have the internet so have faith. The time is coming for the Jews reckoning. Soon I hope.

    Like

    • icareviews
      June 12, 2016

      On the other hand, Germany was a much more ethnically homogeneous population, and therefore much easier to organize. The United States has suffered permanent demographic damage through the importation of slaves and the immigration free-for-all of the last several decades. Whatever form our delivery takes, it will not be a utopia by any means and will almost certainly bear little resemblance to the happenings in Germany during the 1930s, with the possible exception of necessary monetary reform. Dreaming of a better tomorrow is good, but we have to be realistic with regard to our expectations. Some people give me the impression that they believe everybody but whites is going to be expelled from the continent, which is silly. I realize that’s not what you were suggesting, though.

      Like

    • Erudite Knight
      June 13, 2016

      The thing is, the internet is insanely censored, look at google/facebook etc how does someone become unplugged now?

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 13, 2016

        Don’t become “unplugged” – the internet is still out best shot at getting our message out. WordPress (built and run by two white guys) is still mostly censorship free.

        Like

      • Erudite Knight
        June 13, 2016

        Oh really? I always wondered why wordpress wasnt shut down. BTW Ryu tells me you are pretty knowledge, I really need to take better care of covering my tracks, can we email or something sometime?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 13, 2016

        Use Tor. It won’t hide you from the NSA (it’s run by the NSA) but it will hide you from snooping website moderators, the anti-fa types, and the like.

        You can’t hide from the NSA.

        Like

      • TheZOG
        June 14, 2016

        WordPress (built and run by two white guys)…

        I’m pretty sure Matt Mullenweg is Jewish.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 14, 2016

        I’m pretty sure Matt Mullenweg is Jewish.

        I’m pretty sure TheZOG is Jewish.

        Like

      • TheZOG
        June 14, 2016

        The NSA is unable to crack Tor. In fact, the NSA hates Tor for this very reason, as proven by the Powerpoint slides provided by Ed Snowden.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 14, 2016

        The NSA is unable to crack Tor

        LOL! The NSA doesn’t need to crack Tor – since it’s their network – but plenty of people can crack Tor besides the NSA.

        Thanks for outing yourself, “TheZOG.”

        You are amusing.

        Like

      • icareviews
        June 15, 2016

        Do you have an opinion of Wickr?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 15, 2016

        Never heard of it.

        Like

      • TheZOG
        June 22, 2016

        LOL! The NSA doesn’t need to crack Tor – since it’s their network – but plenty of people can crack Tor besides the NSA.

        No it isn’t and no they can’t. Your response regarding Tor is very suspicious (“Don’t bother using Tor, readers, it’s totally useless!”).

        Once again, the ts/sci internal NSA PowerPoint slides released by Edward Snowden reveal that the NSA hates Tor because it is a highly successful tool in concealing people’s internet activities from the agency.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 22, 2016

        @TheZog

        Yes it is, and yes they can. I provided links.

        Your response regarding Tor is very suspicious (“Don’t bother using Tor, readers, it’s totally useless!”).

        Except that I didn’t say anything even close to that. I mean, you do realize that the comments are still there and that everyone can see that you are lying?

        Once again, the ts/sci internal NSA PowerPoint slides released by Edward Snowden reveal that the NSA hates Tor because it is a highly successful tool in concealing people’s internet activities from the agency.

        And you believe Snowden because he was NSA, or because he was CIA, or that he is now GRU?

        Wait, you aren’t even believing Snowden. You are believing the journalists, like Glenn Greenwald, who pick and choose which of the Snowden leaks to release?

        Frankly, I find William Binney, the NSA whistle-blower, to be more important. But no one ever heard of him because he didn’t become a media celebrity like Ed Snowden – Snowden, of course, is the most famous whistle-blower in HISTORY. Hell, they even made a Hollywood movie about him! Because we know, the mainstream media and Hollywood LOVE to give massive publicity to people who are against the establishment, eh?

        The NSA would prefer no one uses Tor. But if you think Tor protects you from the NSA, you are fooling yourself (or others.)

        Again, I provided links – feel free to read them.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Erudite Knight
        June 25, 2016

        Do you know much about it? Do I just log on and its good to go? ISP still knows though right?

        Like

  9. Hipster Racist
    June 14, 2016

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_%28anonymity_network%29

    The core principle of Tor, “onion routing”, was developed in the mid-1990s by United States Naval Research Laboratory employees, mathematician Paul Syverson and computer scientists Michael G. Reed and David Goldschlag, with the purpose of protecting U.S. intelligence communications online. Onion routing was further developed by DARPA in 1997.

    Almost Everyone Involved in Developing Tor was (or is) Funded by the US Government

    https://pando.com/2014/07/16/tor-spooks/

    Hackers can break Tor Network Anonimity with USD 3000

    http://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/26395/hacking/tor-network-broken.html

    Tor is essentially a big honeypot. Just ask yourself why the military intelligence establishment – as well as many of the major establishment NGOs – fund Tor Exit Nodes?

    ANolen.com even reported on the Norway government’s “outing” of the various Tor exit node programs. It’s stupid for an average person to run a Tor exit node – you are setting yourself for legal and financial liability. No one in their right mind would actually run a Tor exit node.

    But they need to maintain the pretense that Tor exit nodes are run by “well meaning volunteers” so they have set up dozens of front organizations and even have promised to hire lawyers for average people who run Tor exit nodes.

    Ask yourself why the military-intelligence establishment and the establishment NGO foundations would hire lawyers for people to run Tor exit nodes?

    In any case, you can’t hide from the NSA, but Tor is probably a good option for basic internet security.

    Also, NSA wrote the major open source implementation of OpenSSL. The math behind encryption is solid, but the implementations are not. William Binney – the NSA whistleblower that did NOT become a celebrity in the mainstream media like Snowden – laid all this stuff out years before Snowden.

    But you never heard of him because the establishment didn’t want to publicize him, like they did want to publicize Snowden.

    What does that tell us?

    Full Disclosure: Hipster Racist LOVES the NSA. Great people. I support them 100%. Please don’t leak that video of me from 2006 please!

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: