Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Michael Harari, Yair Klein, and the Zio-Colombian Cocaine-Carnage Connection

Noriega Hitler

The Associated Press validates the first Bush administration’s adventure in Panama by portraying the ousted leader as yet another vanquished Fuhrer from whom the planet had been rescued.

This past Christmas, Aryan Skynet took the opportunity to revisit the criminal American invasion of Panama in December of 1989 and to highlight the goofy attempts of the government and elements of the press to depict Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega as yet another avatar of the immortal spirit of international Hitlerism. The abject absurdity of the New Hitler libel is thrown into even starker contrast in the light of a January 15, 1990 Newsweek piece, “The Noriega Files”, which, in the course of describing the leader’s actions following the death of predecessor Torrijos, reveals:

Noriega immediately began converting the National Guard from a loosely run corrupt organization into a closely held business. He renamed it the Panamanian Defense Forces at the suggestion of his business partner and adviser, Michael Harari, a former Israeli Mossad agent, who had regaled Noriega with tales about the Israeli Defense Forces.

Harari, a silver-haired man of military bearing, had been one of Noriega’s most eager friends and useful supporters. He would become Noriega’s most trusted adviser — aside from his own brother — now that he had to run the Panamanian military and, to a large extent, the country. Noriega also idolized the Israeli people and its military.

The Mossad alumnus “may have eluded capture on the night of the United States invasion because he was warned to flee nearly six hours before American troops swept into the capital,” The New York Times reported on January 2. The following month, The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs published an article titled “What You Won’t Read about Michael Harari, Noriega’s Israeli Advisor Who Got Away”, which elaborated on the doings of Noriega’s slippery “closest associate”:

For days it looked as if former Mossad hit squad chief Michael Harari, known to Panamanians as the “second most important person” in their country, was going to be totally ignored in US press accounts of the Panama invasion. Only NBC reported on two successive evenings at the beginning of the invasion that Noriega’s Israeli aide and confidant had made a rapid series of visits to Nicaragua, Cuba and Israel in the days preceding the US strike in an apparent attempt to prepare a Noriega escape route.

Mike Harari

Michael Harari

The Israeli press, which considered Noriega the second most important person in Panama after Harari, wasn’t so reticent as it speculated about how Israel’s master spy would manage the escape to Israel, and whether or not he would bring Noriega along.

Despite the early warning to Israelis in Panama, however, Noriega didn’t escape. US special operations troops disabled hidden planes and boats that would have been used, but at a cost in American lives. In the words of the Washington Times of Jan. 4: “Of the 23 soldiers killed in combat, 11 were special operations forces. Military experts considered this a high casualty count for special forces.” In other words, a lot of young American servicemen died at the hands of Panamanian elite units who apparently knew they were coming, possibly because of the action of one or more informants in the US government.

Americans won’t read much serious media speculation about who those informants might be. The numbers of people within the US government who can find reasons not to pursue any investigation that may lead to Israel literally have reached critical mass.

Truth no longer will out, unless it absolves Israel. That is why virtually nothing significant emerged from the congressional hearings on the Reagan administration’s arms-for-hostages dealings with Iran. Because every line of investigation led directly to Israel, no single line was pursued for long. The result is a near-total information blackout. Extremists in the government of Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir count on it, and conduct themselves with total disregard for American public opinion.

But for the bizarre circumstances of his escape, the mainstream US media might never have revealed any of Harari’s key role in a Panama-based triangle that apparently helped put drugs from Colombia into the US, used the proceeds to buy arms (some captured from the PLO in Lebanon) from Israel or through Israeli brokers, and then sold the arms. They certainly went to US-backed contras and friendly Latin governments. They may also have gone to states like Cuba and Nicaragua, and to Marxist guerrillas like those in El Salvador and Peru.

Coke

“Enjoy Coke”

There are reports that Harari slipped out of Panama on an Israeli plane just before US forces struck. Other reports say he was caught by US forces, and then released. Astonished Americans, from embassy personnel to GIs, who believe they witnessed parts of that drama leaked the story. Then the spin doctors went to work to explain that the Americans and Panamanians involved had confused Harari’s driver, a young Panamanian sergeant, with his Israeli boss, the often photographed, 62-year-old, second-most powerful man in Panama. […]

There are a lot of other things about Harari, Israelis in Panama, and their disastrous effect on the Jewish community there that Americans won’t be reading in their daily newspapers or hearing on the evening news much longer. Before Harari recedes into the shadows, however, here are a few facts that were reported just before and immediately after his unplanned moment in the international media spotlight.

The Israeli government keeps referring to Harari as “retired.” In the words of an official Israeli spokesman, “He is absolutely not connected in any way to the government.” However, even Halevy and Livingstone admit he came out of his 1979 retirement in 1980 to accept an assignment as Mossad’s director for Central America. Officially he was assigned to the Israeli Embassy in Mexico City. He spent most of his time, however, in Panama, where he had known since 1973 both Panamanian strongman Omar Torrijos, who was killed in a 1981 plane crash, and his successor, Noriega. Harari knew Noriega particularly well because, during the period “the Pineapple” was working as Torrijos’ intelligence chief, and moonlighting as a $200,000 a year informant for the CIA and for Cuba as well, he also had become an informant for Israel’s Mossad. […]

Noriega had undergone military and intelligence training in Israel, jumped five times with Israeli paratroopers, and-like Uganda’s deposed dictator Idi Amin-proudly wore his Israeli paratrooper wings on his uniform for many years afterward. Although critics say America “bought and paid for” Noriega, he was also an Israeli creation and a great admirer of the ruthless “Israeli way,” as was Amin, the most brutal despot in 20th century African history.

Noriega

Manuel Noriega

It was Harari who reorganized, renamed and trained the Panamanian Defense Forces when Noriega succeeded Torrijos. Harari also instructed Noriega’s personal bodyguard and his “Special Anti-Terror Unit.” Harari obtained advanced technical equipment and weapons for them, and there is no doubt he taught them how to anticipate and neutralize many of the attempts to monitor Noriega’s activities launched by American intelligence officers from their bases in the Canal Zone.

Panama’s strongman reciprocated. On one of his visits to Israel arranged by Harari in the 1980s, Noriega bought a seaside villa in the Tel Aviv suburb of Herzliya. Back in Panama, he sent his children to the Jewish community’s prestigious Alberto Einstein day school and to an Israeli kibbutz one summer. Noriega also employed other Israeli security experts in the Harari-organized PDF, which in effect became the Noriega administration.

As for Harari’s ongoing connections with Israel, Panama’s new police commander, Eduardo Herrara Hassan, explains: “I was the ambassador to Israel but he was my boss. Everything I did had to be authorized by Harari.”

Another irony of the attempt to justify the U.S. invasion by painting Noriega as a New Hitler is that, according to Moises Mizrachi of the Panamanian Committee of the Anti-Defamation League, “in the three-day Panama City looting spree touched off by the US invasion, most of the hundreds of stores wrecked along 20 blocks of Central Avenue were Jewish-owned.” Mizrachi further stated that Noriega “was clearly evil […] But a few said he was good for the Jews.”

In addition to the “key role” Harari may have played in smuggling Colombian drugs into the United States, there are other Israeli connections to Colombia and to the Medellin cartel in particular. In August of 1989, NBC aired a videotape that showed Israeli mercenaries training Colombian drug cartel assassins. The Associated Press reported the Zionist embarrassment:

Retired Lt. Col. Yair Klein told reporters at police headquarters in the Tel Aviv suburb of Petah Tikva he believed he was innocent of any wrongdoing.

“If I did break the law, a lot of other people did,” he said. […]

On Sunday, Klein said he would name high-ranking officers, including one now sitting in Israel’s Parliament, who were involved in training operations in Latin America.

A Colombian judge issued an arrest warrant for Klein, who sought refuge in Israel, which had no extradition treaty with the Colombian government. A contemporary editorial published in the Kentucky New Era, after expressing the obligatory sympathy for their suffering at the hands of Palestinian terrorists, berated the Israelis for their involvement with Medellin:

Yair Klein

Yair Klein

Deeply troubling […] is the news that a retired Israeli army colonel trained Colombian drug terrorists, including their reputed paramilitary leader. A 48-minute videotape captured by the Colombian government shows retired Col. Yair Klein and other Hebrew-speaking instructors teaching 50 terrorists from the Medellin drug cartel. The men learned how to assault an armed emplacement, explode car bombs and shoot from speeding cars.

“I want vengeance, much vengeance!” the men shouted in unison on the tape. “I want blood, much blood!”

Colombia’s national police chief said he has evidence linking the people who received training from the Israelis to the murder of Colombia’s front-running presidential candidate, Luis Carlos Galan.

Combatting terrorism is a skill the Israeli military has developed to a science. It is a skill for survival. It is justified only as an act of protection. To sell terrorist tools to drug dealers is a heinous violation of the right of the Colombian people to live in peace.

The Jewish Telegraph Agency published an article which, under the heading “Not only Israelis”, sought to minimize the scandal by pointing out that “numerous Americans and South Africans are involved in it”. A former Israeli ambassador to Colombia is quoted as whining: “We are used to the fact that the moment Israelis are involved in any matter, Israel is placed in the spotlight […] Even if a connection exists between Israelis and military training in Colombia, this is a far cry from drugs.” The article continues with unintentional humor:

[…] Klein and his associates have been most eager to give their version of events to the news media.

The story was, in fact, a media creation when NBC News broadcast a videotape on Aug. 22 [1989] showing armed men identified as a drug cartel “hit squad” being trained by a Hebrew-speaking officer.

Israel Television promptly identified the officer as Klein […]

He said his clients were farmers and ranchers who needed protection from guerrillas and cattle rustlers the Colombian authorities could not control. […]

As further proof that his clients were not the drug cartel, Klein said he was paid $40,000 for his services, a negligible amount to receive from drug traffickers. […]

Meanwhile, Eitan Coran, an Israeli in Bogota, told Israel Radio on Tuesday that Jews in Colombia have reason to fear reprisals from leftist guerrillas […]

Jewish journalists, in more than one article published in the wake of the Klein controversy, attempted to turn Jews into the most vulnerable victims of the country’s narcotics-related atrocities:

Some […] don’t see a future in their native country, and have moved with their families to Miami. […]

No one who spoke with The Jewish Floridian knows of cases where Jews have been directly linked to the drug cartels, but there have been alleged cases which have linked Jews to the drug industry through the avenue of money laundering.

Jews have felt some backlash from those in Colombia who are attempting to battle the drug lords after an Israeli soldier, Lt. Col. Yair Klein, was shown training Colombian marksmen involved in the drug cartels. […]

Some former Colombian Jews say they feel torn because their families choose to remain in a situation that they see is as hopeless as the Europe of the 1930s.

Be that as it may, the paper also interviewed “Roberto”, a Jewish land developer, who conceded that many of his people were reluctant to leave Colombia because “drug money has filtered into the [Jewish] community and benefited a series of businesses in general” and “they feel they have too much to lose in terms of lifestyle and money.”

The Wall Street Journal followed up with the Yair Klein situation a few months later:

In the nine months since this situation surfaced, Klein has continued to run what he brags is “the best team in Israel for small wars, anti-terror units and commando operations.” An official inquiry in Israel hasn’t led to a prosecution […]

The nation needs international sales to prop up its arms industry, and prosecuting him could open a window that Israel prefers to keep shut.

Klein continued to operate despite also being publicly implicated in the “Guns for Antigua” scandal, which involved a plot to route Israeli arms to Colombian death squads indirectly, by way of an Israeli “melon farm” in Antigua. AP reported in May 1990:

Colombian authorities discovered a cache of Israeli-made Uzi machine guns and other weapons during a raid in February on a ranch owned by Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha, who died in a gun battle with police in December.

After the weapons were found, Colombia filed a strong diplomatic protest with Israel. Israeli officials responded that the weapons were part of a shipment intended for the Caribbean island nation of Antigua and Barbuda.

Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha

Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha

Investigators traced the shipment to Klein and another Israeli, Maurice Sarfati, whose name may be familiar to 9/11 researchers. At the time, however, Sarfati was primarily noteworthy for being sought by U.S. authorities after his Antiguan “produce company” defaulted on more than a million dollars in American loans. Humorously, “Klein said the weapons shipped to Antigua had been intended for a survival training camp being set up for Panamanian rebels seeking to overthrow Gen. Manuel Noriega.” Noriega’s affection for the Israelis was, it would seem, somewhat misplaced. As a result of this unsavory episode, Colombia suspended a longstanding treaty that had allowed Israelis to enter the country without a visa, furthermore requiring all Israelis already in the country to register with the government.

The New York Times gave further details on how the Israeli gunrunners were caught in a lie:

The mystery of how the Uzis made their way there [to Antigua] has set off a number of investigations, roiled the ruling family of Antigua, and posed a sensitive diplomatic problem for Washington and Jerusalem, U.S. officials said.

Israel has said only that it approved the arms for sale to the Antiguan government.

Antiguan officials say they neither ordered nor received the arms. […]

After the weapons were found, Colombia filed an unusually blunt diplomatic protest with Israel.

Israel responded that the exported arms were based on a November 1988 purchase letter from Antigua’s minister of national security to the government-owned Israel Military Industries.

There is no such Antiguan ministry, however, and Antiguan officials say they never ordered any arms.

The Wall Street Journal, in a 1990 article titled “Israel Oversees a Shadowy Industry”, relates these interesting bits of information:

Arms are big business in Israel. At least one out of every 10 workers is involved in the arms trade […]

Some 40 percent of Israel’s sales go to the U.S. and Europe. But even a partial list of other past and current clients reveals the bizarre nature and the global reach of Israel’s arms trade.

Murky dealings in Latin America long predate Klein’s adventures. Israel has supplied arms and training to the military juntas of Chile, Guatemala and Argentina. It aided Nicaragua’s Anastasio Somoza until his fall, then aided the Contra rebels. […]

Israeli military advisors helped Idi Amin to power in 1971. Zaire’s dictator, Mobuto Sese Seko, trained as a paratrooper in Israel, had an ex-Mossad agent as a top adviser, and currently is host to eight Israeli officers as trainers for his army. […]

Israeli weapons sales occasionally have been undertaken as U.S. dirty work, to funnel military aid to domestically unpalatable regimes, but others fly in the face of U.S. foreign policy.

Uzi Gal

Uziel Gal, the Israeli inventor of the innovative machine gun that bears his name

The popular and iconic Uzi, named for German-Jewish inventor Gotthard Glas, who changed his name to Uziel Gal when he emigrated to Palestine, was long one of Israel’s best-selling exports, and has a colorful history that is inextricably intertwined with the drug war bloodbaths of the “cocaine cowboys” period. Aryan Skynet does not intend here to advocate for gun control, but only to document with interest a further connection between the Zionist state and the Colombian drug trade. When semiautomatic Uzis hit the South Florida consumer market, selling for $598 in 1980, the Boca Raton News quoted a Dade County law enforcement officer who said that “the Uzi, a staple of the Israeli army, is more suitable for use by criminals.”

Has a more redundant statement ever been uttered?

There is at least one small morsel resembling poetic justice with which this screed of Israeli-Colombian misdeeds can be closed, and it comes from the January 25, 1990 edition of The New York Times. Arik Afek, one of the many Israelis connected to the training of the Medellin killers – in addition to being the proprietor of some U.S. “flower shops” – was found dead, his corpse stuffed into the trunk of a car at Miami International Airport. Arik, in death, lived up to his name, the Times reports: “The body of the slain Israeli, Arik Afek, who reportedly had a home near Miami, was discovered after the police had received complaints of an offensive odor coming from the car, which had been left at the airport’s parking garage.”

Rainer Chlodwig von Kook

Advertisements

About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

63 comments on “Michael Harari, Yair Klein, and the Zio-Colombian Cocaine-Carnage Connection

  1. icareviews
    March 26, 2016

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. kerberos616
    March 26, 2016

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. BMan
    March 26, 2016

    “drug money has filtered into the [Jewish] community and benefited a series of businesses in general” and “they feel they have too much to lose in terms of lifestyle and money.”

    Nothing ever changes.

    This mimics my constant claims that the “decent jew” is an absurd, vain imagination.

    Even low level jews will NEVER, EVER do the right thing by calling out the tribe. Why? Because they profit and they will not rock the boat.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. indravaruna
    March 26, 2016

    The French author Hervé Ryssen wrote a book about the contemporary Jewish Mafia: http://www.toqonline.com/blog/the-jewish-mafia/

    ” The fact is that from the Chinese opium traffic of the nineteenth century to the present day, this mafia has been quite active in this field. In the traffic of ecstasy, one can say for certain that the Jewish mafia holds a monopoly. Today, ecstasy is the drug that is most harmful to European young people.”

    Liked by 2 people

    • icareviews
      March 26, 2016

      Thanks for sharing this. I encourage readers to click that link, but I also think it’s worth pointing out that the “Jewish mafia” isn’t limited to the forms of criminality we ordinarily associate with “the mob”. The fact of the matter is that organized Jewry globally acts as one big crime syndicate, from the “Holocaust” reparations extortion racket to the murder squads of the IDF – not to mention AIPAC’s bribery and browbeating of our legislators.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. helvena
    March 26, 2016

    Reblogged this on Pound by Pound and commented:
    But I’m sure they have NOTHING to do with the heroine pouring into the U.S.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Hipster Racist
    March 26, 2016

    Congrats, this was tweeted by Henry Makow, the very famous internet author.

    So, let’s see. AryanSkynet has successfully leveraged Breitbart, the Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio campaigns, and even freaking Rosanne Barr.

    We’re no longer stuck in the WN ghetto, we are getting hits from mainstream, normal people with no involvement in the “movement” which I see as nothing but a positive development. Traffic has doubled and even tripled from what it was just a few months ago.

    A lot of the reason is that we didn’t take the party line on Trump, of course. We’re using him, as opposed to him using us. That’s how you do it, folks.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Hipster Racist
    March 26, 2016

    That is why virtually nothing significant emerged from the congressional hearings on the Reagan administration’s arms-for-hostages dealings with Iran. Because every line of investigation led directly to Israel, no single line was pursued for long. The result is a near-total information blackout. Extremists in the government of Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir count on it, and conduct themselves with total disregard for American public opinion.

    It is important to figure out the mechanism of this control.

    Some is obvious; AIPAC is about money and media. Others have written that the way AIPAC works in essentially negative – if you do anything to oppose Israel, they will fund an opponent and you’ll get bad media coverage. The near total Jewish control of the mainstream media is of course well known. When goy Ted Turner started CNN, it caused a panic and Jews bid up the stock to astronomical levels in order to get control of it.

    People will notice the Dennis Hastert scandal is barely covered by the media. I mean, in this case you have the longest serving Republican Speaker of the House that, for years, was flying around the world, fucking little boys, and being bribed and blackmailed by a half a dozen different countries. Clinton’s FBI had the goods on him way back when, but they just sat on it, apparently just using it for leverage.

    There’s something weird going on in Georgia right now. Someone has been leaking sex tapes of various politicians. One of the women had to get out in front of it and make a speech saying, yes, she has sex with her boyfriend and someone may have rigged a hotel with cameras.

    I’m starting to have to believe all of those conspiracy theories about elite Eyes Wide Shut parties and all.

    The media is so controlled it’s laughable. They still aren’t running Ted Cruz’ mistress stuff in the mainstream from what I can tell. If the media wants there to be a scandal, there will be one. If not, you simply won’t hear about it.

    So, Israeli control of our society comes from: money, media, blackmail and other personal control of important people, and an aggressive espionage policy.

    There’s also what the US Air Force calls “nuclear blackmail.” Israel’s Sampson Option is well known and our people really do believe they might they use one.

    Does anyone remember that no less than Zbigniew Beksinski, the Democratic party dean of foreign policy, essentially the Democrat Henry Kissinger, publicly said that Obama should shoot down Israeli planes if they tried to bomb Iran? That was just a few years ago. Some well connected Jew actually went on Alex Jones and delivered a threat to the Israelis. You see, they use places like Alex Jones as a type of plausible deniability; anything said on Alex Jones can be dismissed as a “conspiracy theory.” It should also let you know how mainstream Alex Jones really is, as he has had some extremely powerful people make appearances. I bet that connection to Stratfor is not just rumor-mongering.

    I’m serious, the tard corral that is White Nationalism spent the Obama administration telling each other he was a Secret agent for the Muslim Brotherhood. But the fight between the Obama administration and Likud was about the biggest fight between the US and Israel since, I don’t know, maybe the George H. W. Bush administration.

    In fact, two years ago Henry Kissinger was quoted as saying “Israel will not exist in ten years.” The Americans really do see the Israelis as crazy and self-destructive.

    Maybe that explains the Likud Hail Mary pass that is Donald Trump. It’s now or never, if they don’t get rid of the Palestinians soon, they are going to be stuck with a two-state solution.

    The great thing is that Obama really did beat AIPAC – it was their first loss. There’s really no where else to go but down for them. Israel is one of the most hated countries around the world and once America can gain its independence, it’s over for them. You know they have promised to nuke Rome and other cities of Europe if they go down, so at some point I really do expect the major powers to preemptively de-nuke Israel in our lifetimes.

    Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      March 26, 2016

      Obama’s team stands against Likud, but not Israel. We shouldn’t overstate his anti-Zionist credentials, because the fact of the matter is that he only happens to be on the liberal Z team – the group that Mark Glenn, I believe, refers to as “the smart ones”. Foaming-at-the-mouth Ziocons didn’t get to destroy Iran or anything during Obama’s tenure, but let’s face it: the last two terms have only constituted a variation on the themes of the Bush II administration, with way more racial agitation thrown in at home. It’s still been a field day for the deep state, with several false flags and various new theaters of international adventurism opened up. All we’ve seen is an evil left hand with painted fingernails slapping an evil right hand’s wrist.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 26, 2016

        Sure, and we’ve seen Israel, both the state and the diaspora, split among factions. Part of the Likud coalition is all the crazy religious whackjobs and settlers. Likud wants straight up ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians and Greater Israel. The “left” in Israel essentially died with Rabin.

        Now the diaspora Jews have a problem with Likud. Netanyahu has hooked up with the Jews’ hated enemies: the Republican party and evangelical Christians. Likud’s actions embarrass the diaspora Jews and Likud nationalism makes it harder for them to push for globalism everywhere else.

        The US Israel relationship started turning sour by Bush Jr.’s second term. In fact, the Iraq War Commission was James Baker, representing what’s left of the WASP ruling establishment, trying to wrestle the GOP back from the neo-cons. American Jews wanted Obama – he’s a Jewish creation – but American Jews would prefer an Israeli government that at least pays lip service to a two-state solution and international norms.

        I don’t think Israel decides US foreign policy and imperialism, it’s a distortion of US foreign policy and imperialism. Some globalist Jews, like Soros and Kissinger, don’t seem to particularly care about Israel all that much anyway.

        It seems to me that Jews have been able to take their plans and repackage them for a fit with US policy. It was interesting when a Saudi prince recently admitted he would side with Israel against the Palestinians. The Iraq war was originally planned by Jews in Israel, but the Bush mafia, with their close ties to Saudi and Kuwait, had interests there as well.

        At lot of what we are seeing lately is a war between the Sunnis and the Shia. The US backs Saudi, thus the Sunnis, while Russia backs Iran, thus the Shia. Israel is working with the Sunnis at this point in time, partly I think simply because the Shia are far weaker in their neighborhood.

        None of this is new, the breakup of Syria, Kurdistan, this stuff was all discussed quite openly back in Bush’s first term. I remember when they released the maps and introduced us all to Waziristan back then. So when “ISIS” popped up, people who actually had a memory basically expected it.

        Liked by 1 person

      • indravaruna
        March 27, 2016

        Kurdistan is basically a ZOG project, the Kurdish lobby in Washington is run by jews, the main reason why the Kurds get positive media coverage in the West.

        The israeli actually fear the Shia muslims more than the Sunnis, no Sunni State or terrorist organization is a threat to them, quite the opposite, Al-Qaeda and ISIS have served Zionist goals, it was revealed a few years ago that a little know Sunni terrorist org Jundallah was working with the Mossad to assassinate Iranian scientists, even Hamas was a Mossad creation to weaken the secular leftist Palestinian Liberation Organization.

        The only terrorist organization they fear is the Shia Hezbollah, they fear Shia Iran, in the past their biggest fear was the secular rulers like Nasser, Gaddaffi, Saddam, Assad,.. The Sunni Gulf sheiks are their biggest allies in the Middle-East.

        Liked by 2 people

      • icareviews
        March 27, 2016

        “the Kurdish lobby in Washington is run by jews, the main reason why the Kurds get positive media coverage in the West.”

        I can still remember a paid announcement that played on American television after the Iraq invasion, thanking the U.S. for liberating the Kurds from the iron grip of the Hussein regime. I didn’t even follow politics back then and wasn’t aware of the Israel lobby, but it was clear to me just from that tacky TV spot that some sort of mind manipulation was going on. Unfortunately, it would be a long time before I roused myself from my apathy and started to care and try to figure out what forces were driving U.S. policy.

        Liked by 1 person

    • TheZOG
      March 28, 2016

      You see, they use places like Alex Jones as a type of plausible deniability; anything said on Alex Jones can be dismissed as a “conspiracy theory.” It should also let you know how mainstream Alex Jones really is, as he has had some extremely powerful people make appearances. I bet that connection to Stratfor is not just rumor-mongering.

      Were you aware that Alex Jones is a confirmed CIA asset/operative? I demonstrated this in September, 2015:

      http://alexjonesexposed.info/alex-jones-and-cia/

      Liked by 2 people

      • Hipster Racist
        March 28, 2016

        The link I gave to isgpl.nl goes in depth about Alex Jones’ spook connections. In fact, his theory is that most of the “conspiracy theory community” is essentially a disinfomation program.

        Certainly, it’s well known in the mainstream literature that the CIA set itself up as a sort of “Ministry of Culture” right from the beginning. The Congress of Cultural Freedom, for instance, has been known about forever. Also, there’s the notorious Cass Sunstein “cognitive infiltration” paper. Sunstein was later hired by the Obama administration.

        Catherine Austin Fitts also goes into this somewhat.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 28, 2016

        But on the other hand, let’s not make too much about the CIA. Yes, they run a vast propaganda and disinformation campaign. But lots of people work for the CIA, or have worked for the CIA. Same with the other agencies, NSA, FBI, DIA, etc. If you’ve ever lived in Washington DC, chances are you know people who are, or have, worked for three letter agencies.

        If anything, it makes you wonder how effective the spooks really are if they are reduced to … Alex Jones.

        Liked by 1 person

      • TheZOG
        March 30, 2016

        The link I gave to isgpl.nl goes in depth about Alex Jones’ spook connections.

        The owner of isgpl.nl plagiarized all of that information from my site without attribution. I’m the one who originally connected all the dots of Alex Jones’ various CIA connections, i.e. his father, his mother, his dead uncle Biff Hamman, and his two cousins Verna Grayce Chao and Buckley Hamman.

        Liked by 1 person

      • TheZOG
        March 30, 2016

        In fact, his theory is that most of the “conspiracy theory community” is essentially a disinfomation program.

        Yes, and it’s my opinion that most of the “white nationalist” community is too. The near unanimous support for Donald Trump’s presidential campaign among the main white nationalist website owners made me speculate that perhaps these WN website owners are receiving orders from a central authority to support Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.

        It might sound far-fetched, but then if you remind yourself that the largest patriot/conspiracy website on the internet (Infowars.com) is owned by a confirmed CIA asset/operative (Alex Jones), then it suddenly doesn’t seem all that improbable anymore.

        Liked by 2 people

      • icareviews
        March 30, 2016

        I wouldn’t rule that out; but it’s difficult to believe that even Kevin MacDonald would sell out like that. I think most of it is wishful thinking, desperation, and hopeful projection multiplied by lemming mentality.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 30, 2016

        @TheZOG

        Certainly, the “neo-Nazi” types have usually been either ADL paying various fringe types to play dress-up, actual, literal Jews playing dress up, or FBI informants.

        I challenge anyone to do a bit of research on Harold Covington and tell me that guy isn’t an FBI stooge. The rest of the “White Nationalist” movement has generally been a bunch of whack-jobs. I do chalk up TOO/RADIX/AmRen types shilling for Trump as simply being wishful thinking. I mean, Trump really has said some good and taboo-breaking things. Even though his “movement” is more a function of his celebrity than anything else.

        There really is no “movement” and that may not be all that terrible of a thing. Our job is simply to put the truth on the record and give people an alternative way to understand the current situation. The time for a “movement” is later.

        Frankly, though, I’m actually hopeful. The internet is a game-changer. I really hate the “chan culture” but it really has helped de-brainwash tens of thousands of young white men.

        Man, I really miss ANolen.com. I learned so much from her writing. I have been reading about the CIA since I was in high school but she showed me a completely different way of understanding it.

        Liked by 2 people

  8. Pingback: Michael Harari, Yair Klein, and the Zio-Colombian Cocaine-Carnage Connection | Hipster Racist

  9. smartwhiteguy
    March 27, 2016

    Damn! Even the South American cocaine trade.
    It’s just like Hitler said, “As soon as one even carefully cut into such an abscess, one found, like maggots in a decaying body, often blinded by the sudden light, a jew.”

    Liked by 1 person

  10. Hipster Racist
    March 27, 2016

    I stumbled upon this interesting site from the Netherlands, the Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics. It seems to be related to wikispooks.com.

    By looking at NGOs, he maps the “parapolitics” of the West. The real power of the West lies in the friendship networks. As was described in Lewis Lapham’s The American Ruling Class, to truly be ruling class you have to have both private and public sector experience. The friendship and family networks span various governmental and corporate positions.

    He points to four main Western networks:

    1. The Liberals. This is the Rockefellers, Fortune 500, the State Department, the Eastern Establishment that has been in charge since World War II. Interestingly, this network is now old. The main players like David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger are in their 90s with no clear heirs.

    2. The Conservatives. He claims this network is operated by the Liberals as “controlled opposition.” If you look at the recent work done by Radix Journal on the Buckleyite purges, it fits in directly with this thesis. Heavy CIA influence here, but people always forget that the CIA was founded as the OSS at the behest of the FDR administration by a British double agent. It has never been “conservative” by any definition of the word as we might understand it.

    3. Europe/EU. This is a Catholic network, intent on uniting Europe as a counter-balance to the US. Key American NGO, the Heritage Foundation.

    4 The Zionists. Jews, Israel, Mossad, etc.

    He goes into how the Conservatives have been split the last few decades between Arabists and Zionists, and he has a very interesting take on the neo-cons and puts my favorite nemesis, former CIA director R. James Woolsey, as a key player and connection between the Conservatives and the Zionists.

    E. Michael Jones work, “Slaughter of the Cities,” nicely explains how the Civil Rights movement came about, as a sort of partnership between the Liberals and the Zionists to attack two hated (by Jews) groups: the South/Dixie, and Northern “ethnics,” i.e., Catholics. The Eastern Establishment/Liberals have always been, essentially, global capitalists. They form the heart of US imperialism. These are not anti-white, but not particularly pro-white either. The fourth group, Zionists, are the ones that are the core of the anti-white domestic coalition in the West.

    Considering the Rockefeller/Liberals/Eastern Establishment are on their deathbeds, the leadership of the next few generations may be up for grabs. Trump’s network is quite obviously far closer to the Zionists than either the Rockefeller liberals or the Conservatives.

    Of course, since the 1990s, Silicon Valley has becomes its own somewhat independent, increasingly powerful faction of the establishment. The last 20 years have seen numerous clashes between NSA and Microsoft, Google, Apple, etc.

    http://www.isgp.nl/intro

    He’s excellent on 9/11 as well, and does a good job debunking quite a bit of 9/11 disinformation.

    It’s quite well documented and based on quite a bit on public data, literally counting names and NGOs, and it’s all well sourced.

    So, this article about the Mossad training the drug cartels fits very well into his overarching analysis. It’s group 4 stepping on the toes of group 2 and likely eventually reined in by group 1.

    I think Aryan Skynet should start a collaboration project detailing the various power centers in America. I think once we can understand the core aspects of the anti-white coalition it will be easier to expose/fight them.

    For instance, the New York Times recently crawled through political donor data and identified a group of about 500 families that are basically bankrolling the GOP. These people – virtually all self-made, nouveau riche types, seems only interested in protecting their fortunes from taxes and their companies from government intervention. Seemingly they are completely unconcerned with mass immigration.

    Wealthy Jewish families do nothing but pour money into Jewish causes. Wealthy White families, if they use their fortunes at all, are more likely to promote anti-white causes, like Bill Gates and Warren Buffett.

    I am not a fan of William Pierce, and think the National Alliance was the worst of the worst of costume clownery and militia fantasizing, but one thing Pierce was able to do was fund his organization through selling all that crappy white power/black metal music. We need to be able to figure out a reliable funding mechanism for something like NPI, or at the least, find one old rich white guy willing to donate an endowment for a pro-white think tank.

    Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      March 27, 2016

      I’m not as impressed with this site as you are. The part about a “notoriously anti-Jewish”, “ultra-right-wing” “Vatican-Paneuropa Network” bent on resurrecting the Holy Roman Empire comprising a key component of the elite dictating world affairs is ludicrous and worthy of Alex Jones. It’s indicative of the author’s intention that in the section on this “Catholic” power network, he puts the words “apartheid” and “fascist” in scary boldface. Also, this “Le Cercle” business is just more Jew stuff, as the site gives away by mentioning its connection to Richard Perle. Wikispooks also lists Gerhard Lowenthal as a “Le Cercle” insider and says he attended something called the “Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism”. So “Catholic” of him! Also, distinguishing between Buckleyite movement “conservatives” and the Zionists is largely artificial, since Buckley himself was a mischling largely responsible for purging “conservatism” of anti-Semites and whose “Christianity” lent itself to endorsing Jewish adventures like the Iraq invasion.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 27, 2016

        Oh, sure, it’s a bit heavy on the “fascist” and “Nazi” crap, but he does want to ban third world immigrants from Europe. That’s about as good as it gets these days. He claims his policies are “green left” so it’s obvious where he’s coming from.

        But I think the NGO map is about as good as it gets.

        “Catholic” power in Europe is just far different than it is here. I don’t really read that are something particularly religious, more institutional.

        resurrecting the Holy Roman Empire

        I didn’t read that too literally. I take that as just a colorful description of “United Europe.” SMOM is still a powerful network. Catholicism is still institutionally counter-Jewish. It’s fairly mainstream to describe the EU as, essentially, a German Fourth Reich, so calling it a new Holy Roman Empire I think is ok.

        distinguishing between Buckleyite movement “conservatives” and the Zionists is largely artificial, since Buckley himself was a mischling largely responsible for purging “conservatism” of anti-Semites and whose “Christianity” lent itself to endorsing Jewish adventures like the Iraq invasion.

        I thought he described that aspect fairly well, as he says that Zionists have all but taken over from the “Old Right” “Paleo-Right” that were “anti-semitic.” He may simply not know about the Buckley purges.

        His analysis may be off about some things, but the data and the list of names seems quite credible to me.

        I also like the fact that he calls out the “conspiracy culture” (like Alex Jones) as the fraud that it is.

        Eh, take from it what it’s worth.

        Liked by 1 person

      • TheZOG
        March 28, 2016

        I’m not as impressed with this site as you are.

        Indeed, that site is a bit of a joke. I ran into it a few months ago.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 28, 2016

        Look, it is simply a well known fact that a significant part of the establishment of pre-war Europe was at least sympathetic to fascism. It is simply not in question that “right wing” networks in Europe were involved in apartheid regimes in Africa that were essentially leftovers from colonialism.

        None of that is in dispute at all. That’s mainstream history.

        Also, this “Le Cercle” business is just more Jew stuff, as the site gives away by mentioning its connection to Richard Perle. Wikispooks also lists Gerhard Lowenthal as a “Le Cercle” insider and says he attended something called the “Jerusalem Conference on International Terrorism”.

        The entire point of that analysis is that these networks have connections to each other. He even listed R. James Woolsey as an interface between the Conservatives and the Zionists. So, the Europe/Catholic network has ties to the Zionists. There are think tanks that are specifically meant to interface the two groups. How could it possibly be otherwise?

        I don’t think that Jews are just so powerful that anytime a European attends a conference with a Jew he automatically becomes a Zionist asset.

        Also, distinguishing between Buckleyite movement “conservatives” and the Zionists is largely artificial, since Buckley himself was a mischling largely responsible for purging “conservatism” of anti-Semites

        It sure as hell was not “artificial” in the time period discussed, post-war.

        I’ve never read it claimed that Buckley was a mischling. But even so, the site clearly discusses how the old “paleo-right” that was “anti-semitic” has fallen out of favor as the new Conservative network has grown closer to the Zionists. Buckley was a major part of that transition. Even though the JBS was, at most, crypto-anti-semitic, Buckley still purged them. Also, I can’t see how anyone can deny that the Liberty Lobby has been extremely critical of Jews and Zionists.

        Sorry, I don’t believe that Jews are the only powerful clique in the world. Nor do I believe that all bad things come from Zionists.

        I mean, I don’t know how he could be more clear:

        This group founded the John Birch Society and even the highly anti-Jewish Liberty Lobby (Gen. Stratemeyer and Gen. del Valle), responsible today for 95 percent of people’s anti-establishment theories, including anti-United Nations, anti-Kissinger and anti-Rockefeller propaganda.

        Undiplomatic. Ultra-right-wing McCarthyites and Christian conservatives from different denominations. A combination of the isolationist old right, the interventionist new right, as well as the religious right (Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, etc.).

        Allied with the Vatican-Paneuropa network in Europe, consisting of Opus Dei and the Knights of Malta.

        Teamed up with South Korean interests, including the MacArthur-released Sun Myung Moon and his Moonie Cult.

        Began working with the Israel Lobby in the United States in the 1970s, forming the neocons.

        I find that to be mostly right, if you may quibble with the characterizations (undiplomatic.) Everything he’s saying is right out of Tragedy and Hope (the ultimate Liberal Establishment work.) It’s also absolutely correct that the JBS originated virtually all of the populist right-wing anti-internationalist ideas before the 80s.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 28, 2016

        Plus, I would say that the isgp.nl analysis pretty much matches up with:

        1. Carroll Quigley’s Tragedy and Hope (from an establishment liberal perspective.)

        2. Holly Sklar’s Trilaterlism (from a left-wing populist perspective.)

        3. Cleon Skousen’s “Naked Communist” and “Naked Capitalist” series (from a populist right-wing perspective.)

        4. Virtually anything out of the Liberty Lobby or the JBS pre-1980s/90s (right-wing populist.)

        5. Lewis Lantham’s The American Ruling Class (another establishment liberal.)

        Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands may not have much official government power, but it would be ludicrous to think the organizer of the Bilderberg group is some second-stringer. Same with the remnants of the aristocracy in Catholic countries. Technically speaking Bernhard is a Protestant, but I bet he has far more Catholic friends than Jewish.

        SMOM issues their own passports and they are well-represented in the US Department of Defense. They’ve even been the subject of a hysterical attack by Jewish journalist Sy Hersh (who himself can be seen in this analysis as an interface between Group 1 Liberals and Group 4 Zionists.) I’m fairly certain SMOM is not secretly run by the Jews. No one is suggesting that Group 3 “takes orders from the Pope” or any such silliness, but pretending there’s no such thing as Catholic institutional power among the elites is a non-starter. In the same way that wealthy New England WASPs send their kids to Yale, where they join Skull & Bones and move onto the CIA, wealthy Catholic families in Europe send their kids to prestigious Catholic universities, where they join fraternities full of other Catholics and later join corporate boards full of their former schoolmates, also Catholic.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        March 29, 2016

        The Catholic Church is a rotting carcass. High-IQ whites don’t believe in it anymore, so it’s gone into collaboration with the banksters and Jewish supremacists to bring in a bunch of Third Worlders to keep the pews full. Finally, I find it hard to take an institution seriously as a world power when its nominal head eats his boogers in public:

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 28, 2016

        Also, Opus Dei. I’ve walked by their building in Manhattan. Former SC Justice Scalia was a member. The Moonies run the Washington Times, a fairly right-wing newspaper. That network absolutely exists, and they absolutely have power.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 28, 2016

        Someone explain to me how this is somehow flattering to Jews, or trying to cover up Zionist power:

        http://www.isgp.nl/intro#d

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        March 29, 2016

        I’m not saying it’s flattering to Jews or that it ignores Zionist power. I’m saying it throws in a bunch of irrelevant garbage that dirties the waters.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 29, 2016

        I think it’s quite important for understanding the past and how we got here. If Buckley’s purges are relevant, than this stuff is relevant. There is most certainly a Catholic/European elite network. Of course none of those people literally “believe” in the religion, but that’s not the point. It’s the culture and the networks.

        Sure, indravaruna may be right that there are the least powerful group – maybe – but there’s no question that that network exists. I’m not a Catholic and was not born a Catholic, so I’m hardly trying to play up their power. But it’s clear that there is a “right wing” network in Europe that is both anti-American, anti-Anglo, and even anti-Jewish. There is clearly a right-wing network that wants a powerful Europe. These may, in fact, be the same parts of Europe that want to move closer to Russia and away from the Anglo-Americans.

        I think that site has excellent analysis of the post-war American/Europe establishment, and it’s not particularly novel either, as I’ve said, they are mostly just summarizing a lot of work others have done.

        For the American part, it also mirrors what was written in the Yankee-Cowboy War by Carl Oglesby. In fact, the only thing I’ve read on the site that is truly off-tune is the “Cupid” thing but I’m fairly certain that’s an advertisment.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        March 29, 2016

        “But it’s clear that there is a ‘right wing’ network in Europe that is both anti-American, anti-Anglo, and even anti-Jewish. There is clearly a right-wing network that wants a powerful Europe.”

        Who are you talking about? Jean-Marie Le Pen? He’s at death’s door and his daughter sold him out. Front National is Zionist. I see nothing but opportunists and liberals among the European elite. You might get decisions in favor of Palestine, but that’s a far cry from being genuinely anti-Jewish. If an anti-American, anti-Jewish elite network is active in Europe, what is it doing these days other than giving no evidence of its existence?

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        March 29, 2016

        “Someone explain to me how this is somehow flattering to Jews, or trying to cover up Zionist power”

        Here: read what it says about Christopher Bollyn, who gets lumped in with no-planes “truthers”:

        http://isgp.nl/911_no_757_supporters

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 29, 2016

        I recently viewed David Chandler’s latest lecture on the “no plane at the Pentagon” theory and as far as I’m concerned, it’s virtually irrefutable. The fact he has to be smeared with this sort of thing just lends him more creedence:

        http://truthandshadows.wordpress.com/2015/10/03/chandler-goes-debunker/

        I always stayed out of this, simply pleading ignorance. Doesn’t mean I think anyone who bought the Pentagon disinfo is a “shill” or anything (I entertained these notions myself) but, going forward, if people can’t accept the obvious, it shows just what their agenda is, imo.

        As for Bollyn, I think he gets most of it right, but he has made mistakes in his analysis. Any honest person is willing to update his theory given new evidence. After viewing the dozens of videos of Pentagon eyewitnesses, and hundreds of written testimonies, I can no longer entertain any other theories. Bollyn should simply admit he got it wrong, not about Israel, but about the Pentagon.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        March 29, 2016

        Other choice quotes:

        “In 2006 Rodriguez and Walter traveled to Venezuela and appeared at a conference with white sepremacist and holocaust denier Michael Collins Piper (buddies with president Ahmadinejad)).”

        “conspiracy Nazis Christopher Bollyn and Michael Collins Piper ”

        http://isgp.nl/911_no_757_supporters

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 29, 2016

        I see nothing but opportunists and liberals among the European elite.

        ALL elites are ALWAYS opportunists. That’s how the system works. If you don’t take the opportunities given you, you lose your elite status.

        Maybe “Group 3” is dead, but you can’t understand the past without understanding that group. I would certainly say that Silvio Berlusconi was part of that old “Group 3” elite, and as the site says, Otto von Habsburg was a key component in that network. He only died five years ago. In fact, there’s some pretty solid evidence – including photographs – that suggest that Breivik was part of that network. Including pictures with people associated with SMOM.

        Sure, “Group 3” may be dead now, but you can’t understand the post-WWII European establishment without them.

        And while I’m a fan of Bollyn and even think Piper is on to some things, for some left-winger to label them as “Nazi” because they are opposed to the “Jew” doesn’t really negate the analysis. You’re also discussing a site in the Netherlands, where saying certain things openly is *literally illegal*.

        Sometimes left-wingers are correct. Chomsky is quite correct about the defense industry and their relations to Western imperialism. Doesn’t mean he doesn’t shill for the Zionists when he has to (Mearsheimer/Walt, 9/11, etc.)

        I don’t believe in “good guys” or “bad guys.”

        The general thrust of the analysis is correct. I think “our side” tends to overstate the power of the “Jews” and sometimes underestimate the power of networks we may sympathize with.

        I would also point out that if anything, the “Silicon Valley” network – Google, Apple, Amazon and related groups like Microsoft and Ebay (Ebay founders run Edward Snowden/The Intercept now) can hardly be described in simply “religious” terms anymore. NSA is now known to spy directly on Merkel’s mobile phone. Snowden leaked that NSA essentially has the entire nation of Brazil on 24/7 survellience (and if Brazil, likely everyone else.) So that’s a whole new thing.

        We can agree to disagree, I think the isgp.nl gets 90% of it right.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        March 29, 2016

        “Doesn’t mean he doesn’t shill for the Zionists when he has to”

        But nobody is requiring this Dutch guy to bring up the Holocaust. He’s going out of his way to bring it up and vilify those who have questioned its veracity – specifically, two men who have identified Israel as the mover behind 9/11. Does the site even mention the Dancing Israelis at all? Thumbs down from me; but that’s not to say that there isn’t SOME worthwhile information to be had there.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        March 28, 2016

        Even Joseph McCarthy was controlled opposition under the thumb of oligarch Bernard Baruch, if Michael Collins Piper is to be believed.

        What’s primarily disingenuous about the site is that it seems to want to mislead people into believing that “ultra-right-wing” interests and “fascists” are somehow still among the world’s power players or have any sort of influence. The material on the supposed “Vatican-Paneurope” power structure is particularly weak. He’s got Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi himself, Mr. The-Jews-as-Master-Race-Will-Rule-a-Mongrelized-Stew-Mass, whose Pan-Europa Congresses were attended by Albert Einstein and Sigmund Freud, listed as a mastermind of the European “conservative establishment”.

        About Buckley’s ancestry, it’s more a matter of speculation and hearsay, I should clarify; but here’s what Michael Collins Piper says on page 185 of The Judas Goats: “Although Buckley’s mother was born to a German Catholic family based in New Orleans named Steiner, the late Chicago Tribune columnist Walter Trohan privately told intimates that it was his understanding that the Steiner family was originally Jewish and converted to Roman Catholicism, as did many Jewish families in New Orleans during the 18th and 19th centuries.” There’s also this intriguing passage from a book by Reid Buckley:

        https://books.google.com/books?id=HSkZk6tP8RkC&pg=PR13&lpg=PR13&dq=Aloise+Steiner+jewish&source=bl&ots=itqzogQjnI&sig=ObNvK2TY_BszyrMX7gOuZZ6EBRE&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjlprP6_OTLAhUHlYMKHTwEA2YQ6AEILTAD#v=onepage&q=Aloise%20Steiner%20jewish&f=false

        Liked by 1 person

  11. Hipster Racist
    March 27, 2016

    The 2004 film Syriana represented the liberal establishment view of the time period. The good guys were liberals working with reformist Arab leaders, the bad guys were Texas oilmen (who even name-checked Milton Friedman and openly extolled government bribery) working with repressive dictators.

    Hezbollah was practically shown as the good guys in that film, even saving a CIA agent from torture and death at the hands of a Sunni villain.

    Europe seems more pro-Shia than parts of the US and Europe has pushed to recognize Hezbollah as a legitimate organization, I think because their political party had won some legitimate elections.

    No doubt that the neo-cons and other parts of the US establishment are against the Shia, presumably for numerous reasons: Shia partnership with Russia and US partnership with Saudi, the Gulf sheiks, and Israel.

    Europe was squarely on the side of making the P5+1 Iran deal. The US panics every time the Germans seem to make deals with Russia. Perhaps it is simply Europe playing USA and Russia against each other. Quite a bit USA/Russia tensions are over access to the European energy market, especially gas pipelines.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. indravaruna
    March 28, 2016

    Europe or the EU can’t be seen as a single entity, from De Gaulle to Chirac France tried to make the EU independent from the US, this ended with Sarkozy and Hollande, the French establishment is now made of Crypto-Neocons and Globalists. Not surprising really, its the European country with biggest jewish population without mentioning all the crypto and half-jews.

    The US wants Britain to remain in the EU as it “insider”, even Obama told the British to stay, the UK and Poland are against a EU army and support NATO. The UK is a Jewish colony since the 19th century, the British aristocracy has jewish banskter blood like David Cameron from intermarriage, Disraeli and Rothschild run the British Empire, there is ne evidence that the Ashkenzi Jews originanted in Poland during the 12th or 13th centuries after Polish aristocracy invited the jews when the Tribe had been expelled from all other European countries.

    American influence reduced the EU to vassalage, but maybe it was planned this way, reading about the father of the EU, Coudenhove-Kalergi shows that the EU was a anti-European project from the very beginning. Kalergi basically said that Europe will be mixed race and ruled by a jewish aristocracy, the European aristocracy has been allied with the jews since the time of Julius Caesar, the expulsion of jews only happened because of the White serfs and lower clergy became tired of being exploited.

    Liked by 1 person

  13. indravaruna
    March 28, 2016

    My view:

    – The EU establishment is the weakest of the 4, the Nuland-Kagan-Soros revolution in Ukraine was made to scare the EU and keep them in the US (Zionist) orbit at the same time demonize the last independent White nation. Russia.

    – The Zionist and Conservative faction are one and the same now, Buckley opened the doors to Neocon/Trotskyit take over of the GOP and prevented the ressurection of the Old Antisemitc Right of Lindbergh and Father Coughlin, there is even a Philip Roth 2004 novel about what would had happened if Lindbergh had became President and kept the US out of WWII, the jews biggest fear is the Isolationist Right.

    – The Liberal faction is Zionist and all for the Empire but tries to sugarcoat it LGBT rights and Racial equality.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      March 28, 2016

      Maybe, but Liberal imperialism is not dependent on Zionism, Jews, or Israel.

      If Israel and all the Jews disappeared tomorrow, US/Western/Liberal imperialism would continue without a hiccup. Nor would the US automatically make peace with Russia, as if the dastardly Jews are the single reason the US and Russia are at loggerheads.

      Kevin MacDonald has given us a way to understand Jewish power, but people are still falling into the delusion that the Elders of Zion are plotting all world events from their secret headquarters in the Freemason Sanhedrin building in Jerusalem, or that White Europeans would be enlightened, moral philosopher-kings if only the perfidious Jews – the children of the Devil – were not tempting us to sin.

      We’ve had three Presidential terms in which conflicts between the US and Zionists have broken out into mainstream consciousness. We’ve had unprecedented pushback from various factions against the neo-cons, including numerous scholarly work not at all flattering for them. We’ve had various establishment figures, from Mearsheimer and Walt, to Jimmy Carter, openly discuss the Israel lobby in frank terms. We’ve seen the Obama administration and the Europeans win a significant victory against the neo-cons and Likud with the Iran deal.

      If you haven’t been able to add these developments into your analysis, you’re missing a huge part of the picture.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 28, 2016

        Senator Joseph McCarthy began hearings into communist influence in the US government, the State Department but also the Army.

        Carroll Quigley described McCarthy’s anti-communism as something akin to what we’d describe as Newt Gingrich’s tirades about “liberalism.” It was all for show. Quigley even said that McCarthy was surprised that the same political opponents he called “pinko” actually took offense, because he had assumed they were just as insincere as he was, and that they would all have drinks with each other afterward and laugh at the rubes who took either side seriously.

        It sort of reminds me of Dick Cheney’s famous line at the Council on Foreign Relations:

        It’s good to be back at the Council on Foreign Relations. As Pete mentioned, I’ve been a member for a long time, and was actually a director for some period of time. I never mentioned that when I was campaigning for reelection back home in Wyoming — Dick Cheney

        That’s when the crowd breaks into laughter.

        Why did the audience laugh? It’s because all the conservative Republicans that voted for Dick Cheney thought he was a “conservative” too, that he believed in the Constitution and was suspicious of the “globalists” or the “United Nations.”

        Cheney was well aware that his constituents – the Wyoming rubes that voted for him – were too ill-informed to realize that he was one of “them.” So they all had a laugh about how they pulled one over on the idiot voters.

        The conservatives, the anti-communists, the post-war populist right – they actually believed that the “Communist Conspiracy” was headquartered in Moscow. The reality was the “real communist conspiracy” was headquarted in London and New York. Apparently, the Russians under the early Bolshieviks knew that the party leadership was foreign – and not just that they were Jews. That they were, essentially, part of a trans-national elite, in fact, working with the same “reactionary” powers that they pretended to oppose.

        In fact, the Birchers kept alive the fact that the Germans, who had Lenin in prison, sent him back to Germany with the express intention of having him foment revolution that would knock the Russians out of World War I. Certainly, the British did not have any problem with Russia being taken over by Bolsheviks, if they may have not appreciated the timing fully. The early anti-communists kept scratching their heads wondering why the US would loan money to the Soviets – weren’t they the mortal enemy? Why was the US keeping them on life support?

        I’ve spent half this thread promoting the analysis that the early populist right, like the John Birch Society, was basically “controlled opposition” to establishment, liberal Rockefeller think tanks, and was, in fact, bankrolled by them. The John Birch society itself never used the word “Jew” when it could use the word “Communist.” But that wasn’t even enough. Even “anti-communism” was a little bit too close to “anti-semitism” so Buckley had to even purge the Birchers – that was the first purge, the beginning of it.

        By the 1980s, the John Birch Society’s magazine had regular columns praising the IDF.

        I certainly have zero interest in going back to “old, traditional, rural conservatism.” Those conservatives were just as clueless as conservatives today, if not more so.

        I thought people realized that “Communism” died after World War II. Stalin was not in any way an orthodox Marxist. “Socialism in one country” looked a lot more like Franco’s Spain than Lenin’s Worker’s Paradise. The Jewish communists turned against Stalin precisely because Stalin purged the Jewish Bolsheviks.

        I say we stick with the winners. Certainly, the anti-communist liberals are going to beat “isolationist, traditionalist, rural and small town” conservatives each and every time. Why is it that White Nationalists always eventually go back to some Amish fantasy?

        I like the internet, thanks anyway.

        I’m willing to pledge the oath: “I am not now, nor have I ever been, a conservative Republican.”

        Modern Republican conservatives – and this includes a whole lot of the “alt-right” – are just the right wing goy version of Bernie Sanders. Bernie still thinks he’s the son of Polish immigrants in some Brooklyn ghetto, keeping the flame of that old time socialist religion going while singing Pete Seeger songs. Meanwhile, the actual Jewish power in America has taken the reigns of Goldman Sachs. Bernie Sanders is just an embarassment to them at this point. Hell, just watch the old debates between Noam Chomsky and Paul Wolfowitz from the 1980s.

        Yes, it’s true Buckley purged the conservative movement of the Birchers. But the Birchers were just there to purge the conservatives of the Lindberg and Coughlin leftovers.

        Post-war, conservatism, outside of Dixie segregationists, was already dead and gone.

        The 9/11 hijackers were mostly from Saudi Arabia, and fundamentalist Moslems.

        Ah yes, “fundamentalist Moslems” that partied with strippers, snorted cocaine, and gambled on Jack Abramoff’s casino boats. Also, the anthrax letters were sent by the same radical Muslims, “Death to America, Death to Israel, Praise Allah.” Osama Bin Laden had high-tech underground caves with their own power systems, and Donald Rumsfeld told us.

        At least Donald trump is going to “cut the head off of ‘ISIS’ for us!”

        It’s so hard to admit you were suckered. Same as it ever was.

        Liked by 1 person

      • indravaruna
        March 28, 2016

        “It’s so hard to admit you were suckered. Same as it ever was.”

        “People bought it. I know I did. They were ugly times, and we were given the choice to fight the wrong people or fight nobody, apologize for existing, cower, and beg for mercy. Had leftists had a better response things would have been a lot different, but we were told to ask “why do they hate us?””

        These attacks with mass casualities really shocked people, maybe its a sort of “trauma based mind control” made possible with shock and awe.

        Like

      • KSA
        April 5, 2016

        “If Israel and all the Jews disappeared tomorrow, US/Western/Liberal imperialism would continue without a hiccup.”

        Yes, but without the meddlesome jews, the character of American and “western” imperialism would change drastically, switching from policies that obviously harm our interests to those that obviously benefit our interests.

        “We’ve had three Presidential terms in which conflicts between the US and Zionists have broken out into mainstream consciousness.”

        ???
        When did this happen? The shilling for Israel this year has been more pathetic and cringe-inducing than it ever was in the past, and Americans are as stupid and oblivious as ever to the security threat it represents.

        “We’ve had unprecedented pushback from various factions against the neo-cons, including numerous scholarly work not at all flattering for them. We’ve had various establishment figures, from Mearsheimer and Walt, to Jimmy Carter, openly discuss the Israel lobby in frank terms. We’ve seen the Obama administration and the Europeans win a significant victory against the neo-cons and Likud with the Iran deal.”

        Yes and none of it has amounted to anything. Sorry, but America is completely judaized, and it will never be un-judaized. It’s quite simply going to die, and includes if the despicable shabbos goy Trump somehow gets elected.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 5, 2016

        No, the last Bush term and two Obama terms have seen unprecedented pushback against the Israel lobby. The crowning achievement of this is the Iran deal, which of course Likudnik Trump wants to reverse.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        April 6, 2016

        It’s still important to note, though, that just because the Likud camp doesn’t get exactly what it wants in every instance, it doesn’t mean “the Jews” are no longer being served by the Obama administration in one way or another. What we have with these seemingly anti-Zionist flare-ups like with the Iran deal, is rival camps of largely Jewish interests engaging in internecine strife. There are some Jews who would simply rather make some money off the Mulims than turn Iran into a glass parking lot. Even though I occasionally make use of language that seems to conceive of Jews monolithically, such an understanding will never be precise. The various Jew factions will always agree about some things – covering up the truth about World War 2 and 9/11, for instance – while J-Street or the Bilderberg Group and some of the banks and the Likud network may disagree on another set of issues.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 6, 2016

        I’ve been consistent in making a distinction between Likudniks and Jews in general. Even Gregory Hood makes this distinction, although unlike him, I’ve never suggested that we can make a “separate peace” with Likudniks. If anything, it’s the Donald Trump cultists that think we can.

        Far more than Jews have been part of the anti-Zionist backlash of the last decade. Lawrence Wilkerson just recently did an excellent speech at the anti-AIPAC conference describing some of the backlash. General David Petraeus – not a Jew – was perhaps the most high-profile military officer to call Israel a “liability” in our lifetimes. Jimmy Carter isn’t a Jew. The CIA analysts pushing back against the Office of Special Plans in the mid 2000s weren’t Jews. Most of the anti-war libertarians aren’t Jews. There are plenty of people critical of AIPAC, and form a large part of the backlash against them, that are not Jewish. Seems to me these people are natural allies, if to a limited degree.

        Considering the entire alt-right/WN movement seems focused laser-like on the typical liberal multi-cultural Jew, seems obvious at least some people should be squeezing them from the other end.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        April 6, 2016

        My recent revaluation of Billy Carter notwithstanding, I don’t know how quick I would be to brand the Carter milieu and the Brzezinski-style non-Zionist intelligence establishment generally as allies. We’re dealing with shades and varieties of vileness here. The libertarians have a lot to say that’s valid, though, and that’s the camp I emerged from a few years ago. A lot of those anti-war people are racialists waiting to be awakened.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 6, 2016

        They are allies against the Israel lobby, that’s all. The Israel lobby is one leg of Jewish power. I can’t see any reason to pull our punches on that end, nor to not take help where we can get it. Is mentioning Jimmy Carter’s opposition to Israeli apartheid going to damage the pro-white cause in some way? Doesn’t it have at least a possibility of hurting the Israel lobby?

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        April 6, 2016

        Sure, I’m just trying to maintain perspective. Even SJW-style human rights preoccupation with Palestinian oppression helps to some degree.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        April 6, 2016

        The more time and resources Jews spend defending Israeli apartheid the less time and resources they have to spend attacking us.

        The more time and resources SJWs spend attacking Jews for oppressing the Palestinians, the less time and resources they have to spend attacking us.

        It seems like a win-win for us. Viva Palestine!

        Liked by 2 people

  14. Hipster Racist
    March 28, 2016

    These attacks with mass casualities really shocked people, maybe its a sort of trauma based mind control made possible with shock and awe.

    Yet the Jersey Girls, four little White ladies, widows from the attacks, actually took on the Bush administration and got the 9/11 Commission started.

    Their thanks? Years of demonization by conservatives.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Pingback: Israeli War Industry Clashes with U.S. Foreign Policy: The Cases of El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Guatemala | Aryan Skynet

  16. Pingback: Chile’s Salvador Allende: “Judeo-Bolshevik” as Charged or Misunderstood “Good Jew”? | Aryan Skynet

  17. Pingback: Have a Cigar | Aryan Skynet

  18. Pingback: Rum and Coke: Fidel Castro and Cuba’s Covert Cocaine Trade | News For The Blind

  19. Pingback: Rum and Coke: Fidel Castro and Cuba's Covert Cocaine Trade

  20. Pingback: A Panamanian Hitler Christmas

  21. Pingback: Uzis on the Zambezi: Israel’s Secret Relationship with White Rhodesia | Aryan Skynet

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: