Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Biblical Proportions

It just keeps getting better and better.

Obama, elected on a backlash against the George W. Bush administration’s two terms of warmongering and the economic collapse triggered by comical corruption on Wall Street, has racked up a record of more wars than his predecessor and is now giving his swan song defending those same Wall Street bankers.

bernie-hillary

Hillary Clinton, Democratic heir apparent, is engaged in a crap fight with Bernie Sanders, an 80 year old Communist Jew, who has stolen the young, idealistic progressives right out from under her, just like Obama did last time. While the Democrats paint themselves as the party of the “future” and “progressive values,” their front runner has resorted to attacking those very same young liberal voters as “sexists” and “racists” as her proxies are attacking Sanders for not allowing Hillary to interrupt him during debates, because she’s a woman, and that would be “sexist.” They even came up with a new political slur, “Bernie Bros,” meant to paint Sander’s base as sexist, out of touch reactionaries.

The National Rife Association is defending Sanders for his uncharacteristic support of gun rights, meanwhile, the George Soros-funded “Black Lives Matter” movement has attacked Sanders at his public events, telling his white liberal supports to “shut up.” White progressives, aghast, are reduced to blabbering about Sander’s “marching with MLK” 60 years ago, long before anyone in the audience was even born. Sanders can’t stop tripping over his tongue, now reeling from yet another mini-scandal after saying that “white people” don’t know what it’s like to be “poor.”

That’s the Democratic side, which can’t even hold a candle to the drag-down, knock-out civil war going on in the Republican party.

The GOP was all set to crown Jeb Bush as the next in line of the Bush dynasty, and failing that, nominating Cuban-American Marco Rubio, a light-weight, one term Senator from Florida who was supposed to be the Republican Obama. Instead, celebrity billionaire and reality TV star Donald Trump showed up and has tipped the GOP race – and the party itself – into absolute chaos.

Trump, channeling liberal icon Michael Moore and sounding like more of a 9/11 Truther than Howard Dean in 2004, accused George W. Bush of “lying” about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction to start the Iraq war under false pretenses and has promised to find out what “really brought down” the World Trade Center in 2001. Jeb Bush, after haplessly defending his brother’s record, dropped out of the race, with single-digit polls, in a humiliating defeat. The GOP debates have devolved into a farce as Trump and Rubio all but pull out their junk to compare sizes on stage.

Trump, who has two Jewish children and grandchildren living in Israel and a long record of supporting Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his Likud party, is being hysterically attacked as the new Hitler (Hitler the 13th) by the Anti-Defamation League’s Abe Foxman. Foxman, visions of Nuremberg rallies dancing in his head, has plotzed into his yarmulke at the sight of crowds of White people raising their right hands and pleding their support to “The Donald.” Jewish neo-cons are hysterically threatening to vote for liberal Democrat Hillary, who they now claim will be a more reliable warmonger, “conservatism” be damned.

Meanwhile, Israelis themselves continue to believe that Trump is better for Israel than Clinton.

Trump, who has spent decades befriending black celebrities such as Oprah Winfrey and Michael Jackson, petulantely brushes off desperate attempts by the media to smear him as a “racist” and associate him with the Ku Klux Klan and David Duke.

A complete outsider to the GOP who has far closer ties to Hillary Clinton, the Democrats, and the liberal media than to Jeb Bush, the Koch brothers, and FOX news, Trump has dominated the media without spending a dime on TV commercials. Enthusiastic crowds of White people all over the country are wildly cheering as Trump rails against “political correctness” while promising to build a “big, beautiful wall” on the southern border to keep out illegal Mexican “murderers and rapists” – and make Mexico pay for it. Conservative Inc. is reduced to propping up a despised hack, Cuban-Canadian Ted Cruz, who Trump keeps reminding the voters isn’t even a natural born citizen, thus ineligible to even run for President.

gop-thats-the-planThe GOP establishment is in such a panic they are all but attempting to draft two-time loser Mitt Romney to somehow broker a split convention and somehow, someway, stopping Trump from a likely hostile takeover of the entire GOP apparatus.

Meanwhile, another New York billionaire, sometimes Democrat, sometimes Republican, sometimes indepedent Michael Bloomberg is watching from the sidelines, threatening to run as an independent against Sanders if Hillary Clinton goes down due to her felonious violation of National Security law, the Democrat’s front-runner currently under investigation by the FBI with indictments far more likely than anyone ever imagined. The Sanders vs. Clinton match-up is highlighting a massive racial split in the Democratic party coalition as Black and Brown voters throw their support behind Hillary and Whites vote in astonishing numbers for Sanders.

The Republican overlords panic as Trump seems likely to bring in more Black and Brown voters than their carefully selected token minorities ever had a chance to, while drawing in massive numbers of new Republican voters from the same White working classes the Democrats always pretended to speak for, the so called “Reagan Democrats.”

The only outcome that is guaranteed is that both the Republican and the Democratic establishments wind up completely discredited in the eyes of their presumed voters and at least a few more months of absolute political chaos at every end of the partisan spectrum.

I feel like it’s my birthday!

img-carlsberg_apocalypse

Advertisements

31 comments on “Biblical Proportions

  1. Hipster Racist
    March 7, 2016

    For those who doubt my Trump = Likud analysis (more installments coming), suck it, losers! Notice that the Israelis want Trump, not Hillary, to be US President.

    Israelis have more of a clue about what’s going on than American alt-righters, that’s for sure.

    Liked by 3 people

    • icareviews
      March 7, 2016

      To what do you attribute the apparent disconnect between Trump’s friendly relations with Netanyahu and amicable Jewish opinion in Israel, on the one hand, and mainstream neocon vitriol from Kristol and company in the U.S.? Pure political theater?

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        March 7, 2016

        I think Kristol, et al, are panicking for the same reasons that the GOP establishment in general is panicking. Warmongering neo-cons in New York City are not necessarily good for the average Israeli any more than they are the average American.

        To paraphrase Gregory Hood, it’s not Trump that they hate, it’s us (i.e., Trump’s base.)

        Kristol, et al, are, at the end of the day, GOP establishment hacks with comfortable sinecures and any realignment hurts their careers and reputations.

        And if any wily kosher neo-con secretly does know the deal, they will still feign outrage, at least in front of their Goyim GOP assets.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Pingback: Biblical Proportions | Hipster Racist

  3. BMan
    March 7, 2016

    The only outcome that is guaranteed is that both the Republican and the Democratic establishments wind up completely discredited in the eyes of their presumed voters

    We can hope, but I contend that there is a contingent that will never learn. Every election I think, “surely this will convince them that it is bogus…”, then next election they do it all over again. Many times just swapping from one party back to the other… over and over.

    Dumb as ping pong balls.

    Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      March 7, 2016

      In this video commentary from last summer, Scott Roberts vents his frustration at all the white nationalists’ irrational faith in Trump, who as he demonstrates, has actually called for “boots on the ground” to combat “ISIS”.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        March 7, 2016

        Just remember, the “White Nationalist” movement hasn’t won a single battle for 60+ years. The “White Nationalist” movement was invented to fail, and fail hard, and half of their so-called leaders have been 100% Kosher Klowns, from Frances Cohen (Frank Colin) to The Daily Stormer’s own Joshua Goldberg.

        It’s a safe bet to always do just about the exact opposite of the “White Nationalist” movement, that is, if you actually care about White people.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        March 7, 2016

        I use the terms “white nationalist” and “identitarian” interchangeably. It doesn’t necessarily connote swastika tattoos and sieg-heiling Heimbach type behavior for me. Roberts and that bunch are a little rough around the edges, but he’s spot-on in this discussion. He tried to blow the whistle on the Trump candidacy from the beginning, but Anglin and all those Right Stuff guys just had to go full-retard.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Hipster Racist
        March 7, 2016

        Sure, but that’s what I mean. It only comes as a surprise that Israel is in Trump’s corner when you forget that probably half of the online neo-nazitards have been Jews since the beginning.

        Jews love play acting like neo-nazis, just like suburban white boys love dressing like wiggers and rapping along with Jay-Z.

        Just like hipsters like dressing up like Indians (feather, not dot.)

        When some swastika appears on a Jewish college girl’s dorm room wall, it’s a very, very safe bet she drew it herself.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Hipster Racist
        March 7, 2016

        Just for the record, as of 2016, I count exactly FOUR worthwhile pro-White people more or less in the public eye.

        1. Kevin MacDonald. This is the academic that actually explained the Jewish Problem without having to resort to Catholic superstition (“children of the devil”) or conspiracism like the “Elders of Zion” type stuff. He actually lived to tell about it, despite the $PLC and the ADL gunning for him.

        2. Jared Taylor. Yes, he won’t touch the Jewish issue, but he’s about as good as it gets when it comes to saying the word “white” in public. I love David Duke, but he was neutered by the press a long time ago. At least Taylor didn’t stay content to ride Trump’s d*** – he leveraged Trump to say the words “white people” directly to potential Trump voters. I say that counts for a lot.

        3. Richard Spencer and NPI. We need a relatively normal looking, well spoken, moderate seeming guy who can do videos, give interviews in the press, and otherwise run a “think tank” that is explicitly in the interests of White people. While he’s no Kevin MacDonald, he’s gone much further than Jared Taylor on the Jew question and the ladies seem to like him. I’ll look past gauche missteps like the Macho Homo what’s his name – I just assumed he was invited to distance NPI from the wanna-be Fred Phelpes like the odious costume clowns of Traditional Youth Network and Heimbach, et al.

        4. RamZPaul. No one can say RamZPaul doesn’t address the Jew Problem head on. Plus, he’s hilarious, and not only survived the $PLC onslaught, but actually profited from it.

        As of 2016, those four are the only people doing anything of value (other than the great AryanSkynet, of course, the fringe blog that makes even the mighty Trump Organization quake in their boots. Who else has so thoroughly documented Trump’s direct personal, professional, and political ties to Likud so fearlessly?)

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        March 7, 2016

        MacDonald is great apart from his unaccountable shilling for Trump.

        Thumbs down on Taylor. He’s done good work and I wouldn’t throw him into a gulag or anything, but an organization that’s not even willing to talk about Jewish influence and is more interested in pretending to believe in false flag terror attacks than in detaching the Israeli parasite from white taxpayers has little value for me. I seldom if ever visit American Renaissance anymore, and I’d take Duke over Taylor any day.

        Spencer does mostly very good work and is an articulately unashamed, pleasant, and youthful spokesman for white people’s interests. He blocked me on Twitter for some reason, though, so fuck him. I won’t be promoting his coyly smiling fashy daintiness anymore. He’s also suspect for not touching 9/11 or the Israel lobby and for suggesting a few years ago that whites ally themselves with Jewish interests for self-preservation.

        I have no major beef with RamZPaul. A likable guy, if somewhat limited in his scope.

        Liked by 2 people

      • BMan
        March 8, 2016

        Thumbs down on Taylor. He’s done good work and I wouldn’t throw him into a gulag or anything, but an organization that’s not even willing to talk about Jewish influence and is more interested in pretending to believe in false flag terror attacks than in detaching the Israeli parasite from white taxpayers has little value for me. I seldom if ever visit American Renaissance anymore, and I’d take Duke over Taylor any day.

        Agreed. when the Cuckservative talking point first hit, I featured a letter that Taylor wrote. I had never featured anything of his before. But when I did, shit hit the fan at my place. I lost DC Dave who apparently despises the guy for several reasons, but mainly because he won’t call out the Jew.

        It bothers me greatly that so many people I tend to respect have gone silly over Trump. John Friend is young and still malleable to US politics, so I give him a wide berth. But others like MacDonald really pisses me off. Old fuckers like us should know better by now.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 8, 2016

        @icareviews & BMan

        Actually, I’d take Jared Taylor over John Friend.

        Here’s why. John Friend I’ve caught purposefully shilling 9/11 disinfo. I’m perfectly fine with people who don’t want to touch the 9/11 issue – it has been 15 years, it’s not necessarily a “current issue” and it’s probably strategically best to simply not touch it. But Friend actually pushes the Judith Wood 9/11 disinfo type crap. That doesn’t do any good for anyone, and it actually hurts the 9/11 truthers. So the only possible reason for anyone to push that stuff is twofold: to discredit the 9/11 movement and smear the pro-White movement by association.

        Friend isn’t stupid, so he must be a liar. It’s as simple as that.

        Taylor is a smart guy and his silence on the Jewish problem is strategic, and it’s probably good to have a pro-White think tank like AmRen that is inclusive of Jews. Why? It’s like rope-a-dope. It gives them an opportunity to out themselves – and they ALWAYS DO.

        Taylor invites some Jews to speak at AmRen, and they get up on the podium and spew their vile hatred and lies about White people. Everyone – and I mean everyone – notices it. People who are new to the Jewish problem get red-pilled by the Jews themselves.

        I noticed this at the very beginning, when I first started reading pro-White blogs. Someone makes some obvious point about Jews, and the yarmulke-wearers start shrieking like hyenas, demanding that “neo-Nazis” and “anti-seeeeeeemites” be purged to make the movement safe for Jews.

        The Israel issue works the same way. AltRight.blogspot.com published an article but that “NRx” freak, what’s his name, and he spent half the time talking about why we should all be loyal to Israel and work in their interest (he was featured by icareviews here once.) Make some noise about why the Palestinians shouldn’t be mass murdered, and the Jews will start freaking out.

        It’s rope-a-dope, it’s a great way to get them to announce their real intentions, and they are such fanatics they can’t help but out themselves, as loudly and as obnoxiously as possible.

        What you will find is that their main interest is NEVER bringing Jews to our side, but to “purge” our side of the … “Judeophobes” …

        I’ve long said it, if they were sincerely pro-White, they would be over at the Jew forums trying to get JEWS to stop being anti-White.

        But they NEVER do that – they ALWAYS come to our side and try to purge anyone critical of Jews.

        Some of them have been right next to us, for years, pretending to be pro-White, but once you bait them, they ALWAYS – ALWAYS – out themselves.

        So, the next time Jared Taylor has some AmRen conference and invites a Jew speaker, the entire audience gets red-pilled when some sweaty hook-nosed fanatic gets up there and shits all over white people. Normal white people start asking, “hey, what gives?” Then the people already red-pilled can whisper in their ear, “oh, you know, he’s a Jew.”

        We shouldn’t necessarily tone down the Jewish question, but we should be playing chess, not checkers. Have some faith, Jews are not some monolithic set of super-villains, quite the opposite. They are small-minded, hateful little fanatics with no manners and a very limited ability to hide their shrieking, hateful souls for very long.

        Rope-a-dope. They always out themselves eventually. Let them.

        Liked by 2 people

      • icareviews
        March 8, 2016

        I get what you’re saying, and I’m not going to spend any time defending John Friend, because to be honest I really don’t know what his deal is; but I don’t see us having to make a choice between EITHER AmRen OR no-planes-9/11-reptilians-whatever. I’m not going to stop talking about how Jews did 9/11, and I have to disagree that it’s not a “current issue”, either. All of this hell that the planet is living through right now is tied to that event. Knock that support column out from under the narratives and the towers come down at free-fall. Most people will just think we’re crazy for talking about it; but the same argument could be made about racial solidarity. Most whites, encountering racial solidarity rhetoric, are programmed to recoil; but that’s not a reason not to keep trying to reach them.

        Liked by 2 people

      • BMan
        March 8, 2016

        But Friend actually pushes the Judith Wood 9/11 disinfo type crap.

        I listen to almost every podcast and he would be at loggerheads with Fetzer, who he interviews most frequently.

        He has gotten into many aspects of 911 including the no planes thingy.

        So, as I have said before, I think he is genuine in his opinion (which means he can be incorrect). I don’t think he is disinfo, though, or I wouldn’t promote him.

        Is this your main issue? I’d like to hear more because I actually subbed John’s efforts with the $75 Fee.

        I’d be pissed if I fucked up.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        March 8, 2016

        including the no planes thingy.

        Right, that’s a main disinformation talking point. It’s purposefully designed to make 9/11 truthers look like lunatics, because of course there were planes. Tens of thousands of people in New York and Washington witnessed the planes personally – including yours truly.

        Anyone saying that there were “no planes” is purposefully lying to you. 9/11 truth is not supposed to be a competitive fiction writing contest. Some people really enjoy coming up with wacky theories to seem more “hard core” than other people, but it does nothing but damage the cause.

        Also, Fetzer is such an obvious disinformation shill about so many issues, anyone giving him publicity – like Friend – should not be trusted either.

        Take a look at that whole nexus of people involved with the Veterans Today/Veterans News Now website. This is Cass Sunstein’s “cognitive infiltration” in action. They have roped in a lot of people because the seem to be critical of Israel and even Jews, but it’s quite strategic. At the end of the day all their criticism of Israel were part of Obama’s anti-Likud effort.

        Come on, John Friend even name checks Adolph Hitler and Joseph Gobbels. He’s a pure, 100% disinformation shill.

        Looks like Friend is in the tank for the Donald, too.

        Liked by 1 person

      • BMan
        March 8, 2016

        John Friend and I started blogging almost at the same time (2007). We have linked to each other since those days. I have followed his entire movement within this search of truth.

        He and I disagree about a few issues and I am very verbal with him in interactions. We have also spoken on the phone a few times, several years ago.

        So, as far as I am concerned, he may be gullible and incorrect, but I do not think, for a second, that he is “pure, 100% disinformation shill”.

        I am pissed about him being so taken in with Trump. But at 54, it wasn’t that long ago that I was very uninformed when I was pushing progressive issues in response to the neocon freaks who hijacked us. I was genuine… but wrong.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        March 8, 2016

        I don’t know, he promotes well known 9/11 disinformation like “September Clues” yet he doesn’t even link the only legitimate 9/11 truth organization, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. In fact, I bet he attacks AE911 as a “limited hangout” or something. To me, that basically means “shill.”

        Plus, he’s yet another “White Nationalist” that goes out of his way to link normal, responsible WNs like Macdonald with Nazis, Hitler, etc.

        I mean, not everyone who does that is a shill, but it’s usually the first indicator imo. Pat Buchanan has written what amounts to “revisionist” history about World War II and has been somewhat even-handed about WWII Germany, but Pat Buchanan doesn’t go around seig heiling or engage in Hitler-fetishism.

        I don’t trust John Friend at all, when I first discovered him it took me about five minutes to think “shill.” Sure, I could be wrong, but I like to think I have good instincts about these things.

        I’ve been involved in the 9/11 Truth movement since the very beginning – since the day of – and I have seen it all, all of the disinformation, all of the infiltration. I know precisely and exactly who is real and who is not when it comes to 9/11.

        When it comes to White Nationalism, I don’t know, I’ve never really been in the “movement” per say. I’m just a regular white guy.

        Liked by 1 person

      • BMan
        March 8, 2016

        I bet he attacks AE911 as a “limited hangout” or something.

        I’ve never heard anything like that from him and if I did, I wouldn’t associate with him.

        Also, I watched him transform into WN (he was “Progressive” with me back then). I watched him embrace Hitler after reading Mein Kampf (which, I, too, read). There was no such thing in the early years with John. He seems to embrace Hitler much more than I, but surely you can understand what Hitler was thinking (assuming you read his book and have studied the subject like I have).

        You might have a point, but I’ve watched the kid grow up for almost 9 years. And as pissed as I get when he gets into No Planes and Trump shit, I don’t think he is shilling for anyone. He is just wrong, which I can deal with (in time).

        But, were you to give me proof (instead of conjecture or guessing), I will be the first to call him out here and at my place. I promise that.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        March 8, 2016

        I would also say this. Beware of anyone engaging in sub-culturalism.

        Anyone that tries to promote a “hard core” image, anyone who is a fetishist (especially the neo-nazitards) anyone who wants a uniform, that sort of thing – they may not be a shill, but they may as well be, because that is exactly what “they” want us to do – turn off normal white people.

        Normal white people are turned off when someone like Robert Ransdell starts screaming and yelling in public about “The Jew!” Normal white people are turned off when Matt Heimbach starts talking about “sodomites.” Normal white people are turned off when people start talking about Hitler.

        I’ve also made a distinction between neo-nazis and Southerners. I think people like the League of the South are completely legitimate in their use of the Confederate flag and the like. Dixie is a real nation and those are symbols of that nation. I would look askew at anyone dressing up in Klan robes, but as far as I’m concerned the Confederate flag is a legitimate pro-White symbol.

        Nazis? Swastikas? Hitler worship? Maybe in Germany, but in America? It’s ludicrous. There is no legitimate reason to engage in neo-nazi stuff in America 2016. Anyone doing so I automatically write off as an ADL plant.

        Our job is to help white people, not to get attention for ourselves, or to build some sort of political cult.

        I talk about 9/11 all the time because it’s a personal issue for me. I wouldn’t necessarily say that someone who isn’t a truther isn’t on our side. I do not expect Kevin MacDonald or Richard Spencer to talk about 9/11. I get mighty pissed off when people attack the 9/11 truth movement, but I’m fine when people are neutral.

        That’s my opinion, agree or disagree.

        Liked by 1 person

      • BMan
        March 8, 2016

        Normal white people?

        Look, my real life has me interacting with a lot of people (mostly white). Of course, being in the deep south, most of these people would probably not say much at all if you spoke of the jew. It depends upon the presentation.

        I am in sales, so I would never say anything about them (even though the likelihood of there being a jew around is very low). Only the Evangelicals (which are not few) would knee jerk.

        And even in my personal interactions outside of work, I don’t focus as much on jews as I do Israel (and Zionism) to avoid the knee-jerk.

        Same for uttering the word Hitler. Just like me only a few years ago, I was blown away about what I was taught and what was true about that era. Because I learned that the jew was controlling the narrative in that instance (and every other instance). So hearing the word Hitler in a positive light of any sort was difficult to comprehend.

        I hope you understand my point about Hitler and his book (and his understanding of the Jew). He was spot on, not just for Germany, but for Europe (and the world). Even though quite a few Americans felt the same way, had that sentiment caught on here, fighting off the already prominent jewish influence, we wouldn’t even be discussing this shit, more than likely.

        So, understanding Hitler is not worship of the man. Like every other subject, including 911, WWII, Hitler, the NSDAP, the holohoax, we need to dig below the jewish narrative.

        BTW: the main reason I got into blogging was 911 and the anti-war effort. 911 was one of the main catalysts for me to understanding that the government was far more corrupt than I already thought it to be. It took some time for me to finally get to the jew.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Adit
      March 9, 2016

      @HR

      You forgot one person on your list of people. That would be Bob Whitaker, the only “professional” propagandist our side has.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        March 9, 2016

        @Adit

        Yes, you are correct. I’ve said many times before that I think Whitaker and the BUGS people are the most effective propagandists we have. The cartoon videos they have done have been masterful, and the Mantra is really great.

        Like

  4. icareviews
    March 7, 2016

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  5. doomdigit
    March 8, 2016

    “or conspiracism like the “Elders of Zion” type stuff.”

    That reminded me of this classic, which VD referred to as the “Learned Elders of Wye”.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. smartwhiteguy
    March 8, 2016


    Feel the burn people!

    Like

  7. Pingback: Reasons Not to Like Donald Trump from a Jew-Wise Racialist Perspective – Think Racially

  8. clytemnestra57
    March 14, 2016

    @Hipster Racist:

    “I love David Duke, but he was neutered by the press a long time ago.”

    He neuters himself by trying to unstick the KKK label from his back, drop it, and run as far and as fast as he can from it. Of course, the press always, always catches up with him and affixes it even more firmly on him, thus neutralizing him.

    Instead of making any Pro-White points when he is invited on these shows, Duke spends all his time trying to play down his KKK past, play up his political offices and brandish his doctorate degree. It’s not going to do him any good. He’s probably never going to get any public office, even if anything really radical happens. Tom Metzger has a better chance of pulling that off than he does.

    Duke would be better off letting the MSM’s standard “Former KKK Leader” intro stand without any objections or whining about his treatment compared to Robert Byrd’s by their hands. Byrd never acted ashamed of or tried to run from his past in the KKK. That’s probably why it became a non-issue. If anyone had tried it, his attitude would have been, “So? That was then, this is now.”

    Not only is David Duke’s obvious craving for respectability and acceptance from the establishment his Achilles Heel, it also serves to underscore the subtle theme that only losers, oddballs, misfits and White Trash are attracted to Pro-White activism.

    Moreover, since the Cultural Marxist Left has become the establishment and the SJWs are looking more and more like its useful idiots and tools, White Nationalism is slowly but surely becoming trendy, because it is acquiring a certain cache as a subversive movement, Thus the growing popularity of the Alt Right, Hipster Racism, etc.

    If Duke had cultivated the habit of refusing to allow himself to be embarrassed or humiliated over his past KKK connection by the MSM and not only even took a certain amount of public pride over it but double-downed on his past positions like enumerating how all the Anti-White stuff he and his group were trying to prevent came to pass … on steroids …, he’d have been a far more effective Pro-White activist especially since the average White is more receptive to his message than in the past.

    If David Duke wants to remain remotely relevant to Pro-White activism, he will stop allowing himself to be baited into wasting all his time trying to say he’s no longer with the KKK and simply stay on message! Most White people wouldn’t GAD about his past if he didn’t seem so ashamed of it.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      March 14, 2016

      Byrd never acted ashamed of or tried to run from his past in the KKK. That’s probably why it became a non-issue. If anyone had tried it, his attitude would have been, “So? That was then, this is now.”

      Byrd has gone into depth about how “ashamed” he is of joining the KKK and why that is the worst thing he has every done, his “biggest mistake.”

      The reality is that Byrd gets a pass because he was Democrat, a reliable vote for the Democratic establishment. That, and the fact that Byrd barely spoke a word about his own white working class base. Nothing succeeds like success, and Byrd won his seat, and Duke didn’t.

      He did receive quite a lashing about the “KKK” thing when he voted against the Iraqi war, but that came from Republicans as opposed to Democrats.

      I am hardly any sort of conservative Republican, but it’s obvious to any honest observer that the mainstream media – i.e., the New York Times, the Washington Post, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, CBS, PBS and virtually all of the rest of the media is in the tank for Democrats, and pretty much hates all Republicans.

      That is a side-effect of the media being *JEWISH*.

      FOX is of course nothing but the Republican Party Propaganda channel.

      Duke’s crime is simply the fact that he continues to advocate for White people, openly, thus he will never be forgiven. If he had won his seat and been a reliable vote for Democratic party pork – and Israel – all would have been forgiven.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. clytemnestra57
    March 15, 2016

    Thanks for the follow-up on Byrd who does not appear to have any real beliefs in any ideology except whatever ideology best supported his own self-interest. Maybe that’s why the press ignores his involvement. He joined the Klan because it helped him then and as soon as it proved to be a liability, he chucked it.

    Duke’s problem is that he seems to out of step with the times. He joined the Klan about twenty-five years too late, because by then, it was already considered pretty disreputable and low-brow. Now, he tries to down-play it, because it’s still the early nineties where his former Klan association was enough to keep him from being the governor of Louisiana.

    White Nationalism is the New Radical Chic. Now that the Cultural Marxist Left is the new establishment, they come across as a bunch of prissy, addle-pated, pearl-clutching, point and sputter, hysterical twits at any sign of opposition … even the accidental gaffe of blurting out an inconvenient truth.

    Duke needs to stop allowing himself to be baited about his past Klan membership. He needs to own it or refuse to be distracted from staying on message. If he does that much, he will be much more effective in his interviews. It’s really sad when he spends the entire segment brandishing respectable bourgeois credentials that the MSM just chooses to wipe their collective asses with.

    This happens every time. He is very thin-skinned about this and the media wastes no time hitting his sensitive spot out of the box. When they introduce him as “former Klan leader, David Duke,” he needs to let it stand and pitch his message and follow up with his website so that people can do their own research.

    Most Whites are fed up with political correctness, Black Lives Matter, and the leftist lunatics running the country. His past Klan connections do not matter to them nearly as much as Duke thinks they do.

    He should try it at least once and see what happens, because what he is doing now plainly isn’t working for him.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      March 15, 2016

      Duke’s best media appearance was when he just turned it right around on them. Wolf Blitzer introduces him as “Grand Wizard of the KKK and anti-semite” and Duke says, “weren’t you a lobbyist for AIPAC, Wolf? You are obviously not objective here, why aren’t you introduced as ‘Israeli lobbyist Leslie Blitzer?'” (paraphrasing.) It was pretty masterful.

      And yeah, the Second Klan had lost any legitimacy way back in the 1940s. It was the White Citizen’s Councils that led the fight against forced integration in the 1960s, the Klan was seen as a bunch of hillbilly hooligans by that point.

      Now, of course, the Klan is essentially a theater troupe run by the ADL and FBI.

      The latest news, the Klan in California has just endorsed … Hillary Clinton!

      Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: