Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Organized Slime: Political Mutants Trump and Bloomberg Blow Muck-Bubbles of Mockumentary Media Bombast-Bluster-Bunkum



Oh, really?

Trump supporters, desperate to believe themselves to be the participants in a secular crusade to make America great “again”, have gone so far as to cast The Donald as a kind of absurdist Christ, feared and hated by “the Jews” and – some even dare to suggest – in danger of an assassination attempt if he loosens his lips too much. Mark Glenn of the Ugly Truth podcast is so impressed with the candidate’s enigmatic 9/11 truther credentials that he assumes that Trump must have the backing of some rogue deep state intelligence group that has pledged itself to his personal safety.




BloombergJewsTrumpAlt-Righters have heard Trump make two or three comments that would seem to allude, if only obliquely, to Israeli crimes against the United States, and this, the story goes, is why “the Jews” are now out to “shut it down”. Trump himself repeatedly sulks in public because the press treats him “unfairly” – this despite the media heaping untold millions of dollars in free publicity onto what TV tycoon The Donald insists is a self-financed campaign. Trump, for instance, took aim and fired his famous mouth at Michael Bloomberg’s media company in particular, insulting the news service as a “disgrace” and claiming it purposefully cited a mischievously low (2.9 billion) estimate for his wealth. “I think bad things will happen for Bloomberg because the quality of their reporting is so bad,” Trump predicted. “Maybe Michael told them to do it,” The Daily Stormer’s “Great White Hope” mock-sniped at his Zio-Mafioso New York crony and benefactor.


Two loc’d-out niggas, so we crayzay

The risible Trump-vs.-the-Jews and Trump-vs.-the-Liberal-Media narratives, the latter of which The Donald himself has done much to foster so as to rile his middle American radical fanboys and suck still more attention toward himself, are both demonstrably fraudulent, as will be momentarily evident. Furthermore, the aforementioned Bloomberg media apparatus – nothing if not the quintessential example of both the Jewish news monopoly and “the Liberal Media” – furnishes the ideal case study through which to examine the credibility of the posited death struggle between the putatively belligerent camps.


Investment Watch corroborates the “Trump-vs.-the-Liberal-Media” line


Does Bloomberg have an agenda to take down Trump? Coverage of the Trump campaign at Bloomberg is by no means uniformly or even predominantly positive; but the media group and its writers – including obviously Jewish ones – in no way exhibit the rabid animosity that many on the Alt-Right would like to attribute to “the Jews”. The Bloomberg group has been critical of Trump’s proposed immigration plan, and Bloomberg Businessweek produced a refreshing revisionist account of Trump’s alleged but never substantiated mega-billions; but at other times the Bloomberg group evinces what might even be described as a mild enthusiasm. Going into the Iowa Caucus, Bloomberg Politics contributor Joshua Green informed Breitbart that “Trump is just kicking ass all across the state of Iowa.”





Given the number of dictator and Hitler analogies in which Trump detractors and boosters alike have been known to indulge, Bloomberg’s reporters exhibit a comparative moderation. Megan McArdle, while disapproving, rings no alarum in her assessment of what a Trump presidency would mean:

What you realize when you get to Washington is that the kind of wholesale change the revolutionaries imagine is not possible. […]

This is the reality: Most of what you want to do to Washington won’t get done — and neither will much of what you want to get done outside of it, if you insist on taking Washington on. […]

This maddens almost everyone, including me. But that is the reality. And it means that the effects of President Donald Trump would be, in most areas, much less dramatic than his followers expect. He could issue some executive orders. I probably wouldn’t like them. But in most departments, the government would continue to go on operating very much as usual. […]

This will be dismaying news to Trump’s supporters, of course, who imagine wholesale war where the losers who are stealing all of America’s greatness get ruthlessly destroyed. Sorry to say it, but if you hate the government now, you’ll hate it just as much under Trump. It will be doing all the same things.

What? No pogroms against hedge fund managers and Auschwitz-like internment of Mexicans?

Apparently not.




Most telling and damning for those who insist on the Trump-vs.-the-Jews and Trump-vs.-the-Liberal-Media hoaxes is a surprising episode in which Bloomberg Politics falsified the results of its Republican focus group last summer. Rather than smearing the candidate as one might expect of “the Liberal Media”, Bloomberg’s spin quacks instead misrepresented participant feedback to make Trump appear more popular than he actually was at that comparatively early stage in his candidacy. Talking Points Memo’s Catherine Thompson reports:

Bloomberg Politics’ “With All Due Respect” won the morning Thursday with a boffo focus group of New Hampshire Trump supporters singing The Donald’s praises as a “classy” commander-in-chief-in-waiting who is definitely “one of us,” despite being worth billions of dollars. But one of the voters featured Wednesday night in the focus group told TPM that she’s not a Trump supporter at all. And the same went for most of the other participants in the panel, according to the voter.

Jessica DeBurro was prominently featured in a video of the focus group posted to Bloomberg Politics’ website that showed 12 Granite State residents fawning over Trump’s everyman appeal and vast wealth. Bloomberg Politics described the focus group participants as “12 Republican and independent voters who are supportive of Donald Trump’s presidential candidacy,” while co-managing editor John Heilemann, who led the focus group, further stated that the participants were Trump supporters whose “second choices in the Republican field ran the gamut from Jeb Bush and John Kasich to Ben Carson and Ted Cruz.”

But DeBurro, a data analyst, told TPM Thursday in a phone interview that she is actually a supporter of Carson’s and not Trump’s. She added that while all the participants in the focus group had listed Trump among their top three favored Republican presidential candidates, just one person was “100 percent a Trump supporter.”

It was not immediately clear why “With All Due Respect,” which has a troubled history of controversy and pratfalls, could not assemble 12 actual Trump supporters out of the entire state of New Hampshire or why Bloomberg Politics claimed it was a group of Trump supporters when, according to DeBurro, only one of the 12 is currently supporting the boisterous mogul.


While most controversy tied to the show has focused on Bloomberg Politics impresario Mark Halperin, DeBurro further alleged that interviewer Heilemann, Halperin’s co-host, pumped them to think of positive things to say about Trump which could then be edited together into a Trump fawn-a-thon. “What they’re taking is these snippets of us saying positive things to answer questions where they asked us to state a positive thing and then representing it as if we’re all his staunchest supporters,” she explained. “And we’re not.” […]

DeBurro told TPM that she believed the video was selectively edited and that the questions Heilemann asked were engineered to get the focus group participants to speak positively about the real estate mogul.

“The questions were geared mostly toward the positive,” she said. “They were all ‘tell me something you like about him’ or ‘what makes him appealing to voters.’ It was all positive-focused, not ‘what do you not like’ or ‘why do you like this other candidate better.'”

DeBurro said that focus group participants did voice concerns that Trump was a “hothead” and may “say something really stupid.” She added that she had the impression that the focus group would be talking about all the Republican presidential candidates until the focus group settled into the studio.

“They were looking specifically for conservative voters and they asked us for our three choices,” DeBurro recalled. “So I didn’t realize it was entirely about Trump until we got there and [Heilemann] said ‘Oh we’re going to talk about him, mostly.'”

Why would “the Jews” and “the Liberal Media” goad prospective voters into voicing seeming approval of Trump? This, let the reader note, was after the flare-up over his “racist” statement about illegal Mexican rapists. Why, indeed? “New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg says Donald Trump running for president would be great for the news media,” New Zealand’s Southland Times reported in its issue of April 13, 2011. “Bloomberg says Trump would generate lots of headlines and buy lots of advertising, which might save the jobs of some journalists.” In other words, Michael Bloomberg, as proprietor of the considerable Bloomberg media apparatus, which only recently launched its timely Bloomberg Politics brand, stands to make a buck by cultivating, sustaining, and exploiting political controversy.

This may also go some way toward explaining the billionaire’s hitherto enigmatic announcement that he may or may not plunge into the presidential fray. What better way than a teased bid for the presidency to get people googling “Bloomberg” and pulling up the mogul’s own house brand news stories in the search results? “By now, the Michael Bloomberg presidential trial balloon is a ritual,” writes Jamelle Bouie at Slate. “National reporters, who are either based in New York or Washington, will debate it, and we’ll eventually conclude that the exercise is a bit silly. Bloomberg won’t run — it was just a trial balloon, after all — and we’ll move on.” Newsday’s Tom Brune contributed these insights on January 26th:



The camp that thinks Bloomberg is mainly sending a message cite the timing and method of making his interest known – a leaked story a week before the Iowa caucuses – and the fact that no third-party candidate has won the presidency.

The story hit as Sanders surged in New Hampshire and Iowa polls, suggesting “this is a ‘stop Sanders’ effort,” said Neil Sroka, spokesman for the progressive nonprofit Democracy for America, which is backing Sanders.

“Bloomberg is extremely close to Wall Street,” Sroka said, and Sanders campaigns against it. Bloomberg also has ties to Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, who the former mayor would not likely challenge, Sroka said.

Ari Fleischer, former spokesman of President George W. Bush, said Bloomberg’s exploration of a run “is aimed squarely at Sanders if he wins, and it’s putting a toe across the line in case Hillary gets indicted,” a reference to the federal inquiries into Clinton’s use of private email as U.S. secretary of state. […]

Robert Zimmerman of Great Neck, N.Y., a Democratic National Committeeman and Clinton friend, said he isn’t worried about speculation about a Bloomberg campaign.

“To put this in perspective, this is fantasy baseball for political pundits,” Zimmerman said.

Bloomberg is hardly alone in milking the Trump phenomenon for ratings, clicks, and revenue. “It’s the worst and most obvious political snow job in history,” writes Leon H. Wolf at Red State.

The media uses Donald Trump for ratings. Donald Trump uses the media to keep himself front and center in the Republican field, and as an object of two minutes’ hate for his crowd. The media “attacks” Donald, knowing it will solidify his support with his crowd, and the Donald whines and moans about how “unfair” the media is to him ad nauseam. Lather, rinse, repeat.

You get the very clear sense that the media would have absolutely no idea what to cover if Trump were not around. For proof of concept, look no further than the clock Politico kept running earlier today that counted the time since Donald Trump’s last tweet. You can get a sense for how the media really feels about things when the mask slips, and they say what they really think. […]

The symbiotic relationship between Trump and the media in which they pretend to be enemies while they profit off of each other has been great for both Trump and the media, but it’s been terrible and cancerous for the Republican party.

Which, of course, is fantastic news for identitarians.

“The Jews” and “the Liberal Media” both could hardly be less alarmed, however, if Trump becomes the next American president. What follows is a sampling of Bloomberg journalists’ written and tweeted output on Trump. Skynet readership is invited to try to find the hysterical yelps of “the Jews” and wringing of hands of “the Liberal Media” over some imagined Shoah looming on the not-so-distant horizon.





















Rainer Chlodwig von Kook

More coverage of Donald Trump at Aryan Skynet:

How Trump Cleaned Up on a Garbage Dump; PLUS: Trump’s Forgotten Holocaust Awareness Advocacy

Donald Trump: The Soros Connection

When Lefties Are Right

The Boys of Summer

Asleep at the Wheel: Trump-Drunk Alt-Right Swerves Off-Course in Promotion of Fake Billionaire

Stack the Deck: The Trump Candidacy Considered as Cryptographic Prank

Reality TV

The Donald Deception


About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

35 comments on “Organized Slime: Political Mutants Trump and Bloomberg Blow Muck-Bubbles of Mockumentary Media Bombast-Bluster-Bunkum

  1. icareviews
    February 4, 2016

    Reblogged this on icareviews.


  2. Hipster Racist
    February 4, 2016


    4Channers living in their mom’s basement masturbating to anime porn have likely never met an actual Jew.

    It’s true, Jews vote 80% Democrat, tend to be liberal, and they virtually all support “diversity” and mass immigration.

    But at least 20% are standard issue Republicans when it comes to economic issues. Does anyone really think all those hedge fund managers in Connecticut vote for higher taxes and social welfare?

    Then, of course, you have the Zionists that vote GOP because they need the White cannon fodder to prop up the apartheid regime of Jew bigotry in Zionist-occupied Palestine.

    Yes, 80% of Jews hate Trump – well, at the least, they hate Trump’s fan base. It is, after all, made up of all those scary KKK Nazi Christians in fly over country.

    The Jews that really matter? Like Michael Bloomberg? No, they are not “scared” of Trump, not in the slightest.

    Trump is a well loved figure in Israel. Trump doesn’t suck up to Netanyahu and Likud because he needs the AIPAC donations and Jew media coverage.

    Trump sucks up to Netanyahu and Likud because he has a Jewish family and children and grandchildren living in Israel.

    /pol/ and the Daily Stormer can be fun, and who knows, maybe there is some benefit to all those Hitler memes, at the least to break some taboos.

    But I wouldn’t take their online trolling particularly seriously, nor their “analysis of the Jewish problem.”

    Come on.

    I can pretty much guarantee that both of my Jewess ex-girlfriends hate Trump, loved Obama, and hated Bush. But their fathers? That might be a different story.

    I can also guarantee you that a surprisingly high number of Internet Nazis are, offline, as kosher as a midtown deli.

    The only good thing about Trump is that he’s pushing immigration restriction and has signed on to Jeff Session’s immigration plan. That’s about it.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Phukyoojooz
    February 4, 2016

    TRUMP IN 2016!!!


  4. kerberos616
    February 4, 2016

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.


  5. joopuncher
    February 4, 2016

    That’s OK, allow Joe Lunchpail to be deceived one last time!
    Let him get his hopes sky high!!
    When Trump loses, as he inevitably will, millions of disappointed and outraged Whites will wake up and realize that if they want “change they can believe in”, not that joo hot air, they will have to do it the same way it’s always been done before, by rising up and doing it their own damned selves!!
    There will be a lot of broken hearts and heads, but you can’t make an omelet with out throwing out a bunch of broken, empty egg shells!
    This gon’ be GOOD!


    • Hipster Racist
      February 5, 2016

      “joopuncher?” Really? Come on. Why not just go back to your old handle.


      • commiecrusher
        February 5, 2016

        Why indeed.
        I’m in a whimsical mood and I thought this was still a relatively free country.

        You White folks is too uptight.
        Just kidding!
        Have a pleasant tonight and an awesome tomorrow!


      • Hipster Racist
        February 5, 2016

        You know, posing online as “Violent Neo-Nazis” doesn’t do us any good.

        In fact, it’s EXACTLY what Jews do.

        You aren’t a JEW, now, are you, MurderByMedia?

        Cause you sure as hell ACT like a Jew.

        Oh, wait, are you offended by that suggestion?

        Don’t get all “triggered” now.


      • Hipster Racist
        February 5, 2016

        Hey now, don’t get all “triggered” by my criticism of MurderByMedia – I’ve been subscribed to “MurderByMedia” dozens – hundreds – of online personas for over five years now.

        He hates niggers, hates JEWS, and otherwise fulfills the typical stereotypes.

        However, it’s obvious and very, very clear that “MurderByMedia” isn’t stupid, he isn’t some clown that doesn’t understand how his multiple-dozens of online personas come across.

        I dunno – YOU tell me. Does “murderbymedia” actually HELP the cause when he uses handles like “punchjoos” – or does he HURT us?

        He has, after all, dozens, if not hundreds, of online personas, and it’s all the same thing – “we hate niggers, we hate jews” – just like those KKKs I see on the jew media all the time.

        Don’t get me wrong – I’m a fan, and have been subscribed to all of his sites for over five years now.

        But you have to ask – at what point is it actually NOT CLEVER anymore. At what point does the “joke” – if it is a “joke” – just get old?

        I’m not sure.

        But spamming his websites as “punchjoos” is about the lamest thing I could even imagine. I preferred it when he was still “murderbymedia.”

        “MurderByMedia” is a great handle. “PunchJoos” comes across as pathetic, disinformation, jew crap to me.

        There, I said it.

        What are you gonna do, MurderByMedia, now accuse me of being a “jew” or something?



      • icareviews
        February 5, 2016

        Boys, boys … While I’ve never been in the business of accusing fellow bloggers of being Jews or cointelpro, I do think that some types of rhetoric are ill-advised if we intend to expand our base within the race. I’ll go on the record in defense of Germanicus Fink aka Smart White Guy of MurderByMedia, however, in asserting that it is my firm conviction that his intentions are honorable, even if not in perfect accord with what we do here at Skynet. He plays to different audience expectations, that’s all. He’s more Incog Man than Radix.

        Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      February 5, 2016

      Legal disclaimer: Aryan Skynet in no way condones or endorses the breaking of heads, eggs, or hearts.


  6. Hipster Racist
    February 5, 2016

    When I was a teenager, I saw a news program about the KKK.

    It was about five guys, dressed in robes and hoods, doing a public demonstration where they shouting into a bullhorn, “we hate naaagers, we hate jooos.”

    They were surrounded by a few hundred “counter-protestors” screaming and yelling at them.

    At the time, being a kid, I thought that was the “real Klan.” Years later, I found out that the KKK didn’t really exist anymore, but was, essentially, a group of FBI and ADL stooges, being paid, in order to smear Southern white people concerned with race as a bunch of idiot rednecks who “hated” people.

    I found out that the real KKK that did actually exist in the past was quite different. The first Klan was nothing more that a guerrilla force still fighting the War Between the States, and that the Second Klan was a popular fraternity, quite mainstream at the time, protesting against mass immigration.

    When I was living in New York City post 9/11, various “radical Muslim” groups were featured in the news on a daily basis. It came out years later that most of these groups were actually not “radical Muslims” but Jews dressing up as radical Muslims, saying the most “controversial, pro-terrorists” things they could. I’ve written about them before, Joseph Cohen calling himself “Youseph al-Kattab of Revolution Muslim” for one.

    I found out that the “American Nazi Party” was actually run by a Jew named Frances Cohen – the same guys who were given massive coverage by the mainstream media in the 1970s.

    I’ve written about the Jew guy being featured on The Daily Stormer, posing as a “Nazi” and also pretending to be an ISIS member.

    So forgive me if I’m a little suspicious when people online use handles like “Punch Jews” or “Niggers are Apes.”

    I suspect – I don’t know, but I suspect – I’m dealing with people purposefully trying to damage the cause and make people who are pro-white look like a bunch of knuckle-draggers.

    I’ve read the Edward Snowden leaks – including stuff that Glenn Greenwald won’t publish on The Intercept. I found out that the NSA – yes THAT NSA – has an entire department devoted to online trolling.

    We’re all aware of Cass Sunstein’s “cognitive infiltration” project. At the height of the 9/11 Truth movement, when Architects and Engineers were finally getting some media coverage, there was a host of new “truther” groups saying stupid, obviously false things about “mini-nukes” “space beams” etc. All were obviously designed to discredit the truth movement.

    I read some website like Renegade Tribune, which features some decent articles about white interests, mixed with complete crap like the “flat earth” spam that has gotten popular recently.

    As has been heavily documented here, Donald Trump – a Hollywood Celebrity – who has close personal ties to Israel, and in fact, promotes all the typical AIPAC talking points about Iran and other things, is being promoted by “neo-Nazis” online. We have people at least pretending to be serious suggesting that “the Jews” are in some massive conspiracy against Donald Trump.

    Again, I’m not sure what to make about all this.

    But I do know this, for a fact. People who go online and pose as stereotypical “racists” talking about how they “hate naaggers and joos” are, most of the time, purposefully trying to make anything pro-white look bad. I do know that people like the old TOO poster “Mark” who say pro-white people should “start forest fires” in order to “bring down the government” are, essentially, trolls.

    I do know that nutjobs like Harold Covington, who dresses up in full Nazi regalia, complete with a swastika armband, are in fact FBI informants, along with other “extreme” personalities like radio broadcaster Hal Turner. This is now well known, included in court transcripts. Turner even published his FBI checks.

    Occasionally I’ll read the Daily Stormer, and I’ll be the first to admit I’ve LOL-ed at some stuff that Anglin writes. But then I’ll read the comment section and there’s a bunch of people pretending it’s all serious.

    So, you know, I’m suspicious. I have to be.

    Check out what a professional disinformation campaign looks like online:


  7. Mike
    February 6, 2016

    The DailyStormer for me died when the majority of its commenters online mocked the moral compass, which distinguishes europeans from the noble savages AND the childish nature of idolism that became adopted and manifested itself as a sort of incrowd worship of un-european un-intellectual concepts, namely anime, hitler-fetishes and straight up undiluted trump worship. We are not the sum of these parts EVER.
    It is my belief that you cannot debate at length anything regarding an obviously violent racial revolution in the near future without giving physical defence a fair concideration, especially when you are made to adhere to a cultural marxist viewpoint and accept its limitations within the concept of what PC is and does, effectively pitting a disclaimer against where the truth might otherwise take us.


    • Hipster Racist
      February 6, 2016

      LARPing about a “violent revolution” is a lot of the reason “the movement” hasn’t gotten anywhere. The anti-whites are so desperate to paint us as violent haters that they will literally create false groups claiming to be pro-white that LARP about violent revolution and say stereotypically hateful things.

      You know what is effective? BUGS, Bob Whitaker, and White Rabbit Radio. Their rhetoric is one million times more effective than Trump-worship and about a billion times more effective than stereotypical clownery and online tough guy posturing.

      RamZPaul has done more for the pro-white cause than David Lane ever did.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Mike
        February 6, 2016

        Violence is headed for the white race, that is probably the one element we can at least deduce from the last few years of multi-cultural (ethnic cleansing) & immigration/refugee policy, basic maths will show anyone at all interested that violence against whites is proportionate to gross immigration figures vs low birth rates of whites.

        Its that simple really.

        The Daily Stormer, Stormfront, pretty much all of the readymeal funded alt-right and painfully trendy blogs that tell you what you already see yourself have something in common…..they claim to be against a violent revolution in as much as the disclaimers on their sites portray, while at the same time they offer you over kill on the violence committed against whites, reams of pages devoted to violence.
        This has the effect of desensitizing the reader as they accept the violence is a one way behavioural pattern, this has a negative effect of offering nothing but defeatism on the part of whites while stripping any hope of any WN promoting violence (in this case physical defense as a means of deterant) which if wasn’t maintained properly must surely of been how the white european woke up to this nightmare.

        Talk is cheap, besides that we have a majority demographic (new generation of europeans) who are simply to far gone into the Marxist brain washing machine to appreciate the end game is now in sight.

        The real meat of this modern test is one of choices Vs time.

        You can wait until you are truly outnumbered or you can use the time you have to warn others that they will need to prepare for increasing levels of violence against whites (females first then when outnumbered all males of fighting age).

        Blogs, WN/Alt-right websites can and sometimes do allow for dissemination of the obvious but a line must be drawn in a near future date otherwise all the intellectualism we have between us will be lost as it was used on a time wasting dead end.


    • Hipster Racist
      February 6, 2016

      Violence is headed for the white race

      I’m not sure where you have been for the last 100 years, but the White race has proven to be the unmatched expert at organized violence – two world wars, a few “police actions” in the later 20th Century, and since 9/11, a dozen or so mini-wars in the Middle East.

      Seems to me the violence has been here for a while.

      Now, fantasies about “violent revolution” are, of course, a Communist thing. Ask The Order – or the Bundy Militia – how “fighting the government” works out.

      People sometimes talk about the IRA, but the IRA had an actual community that, to one degree or another, supported the militants.

      Americans do not.

      We already have a very large group of organized, heavily armed White men in America. They are called the US military and the combined US law enforcement agencies.

      Young guys often have fantasies about “hot lead and cold steel” – the “day of the rope” – where there’s a fantastic explosion of violence, our enemies are defeated, and we all live happily ever after.

      That sort of Red Dawn fantasy usually appeals to young men who have never served in the military. It sure is fun to fantasize about it online. But I always just ask the question: who are you going to shoot? And the follow up: who is going to support you?

      No one can really answer that question.

      The real work is meta-politics. Community organizing. I know, it’s not nearly as much fun to fantasize about, but hey, who said saving the white race would be easy?

      Again, RamZPaul has done more for the White race than David Lane ever did. RamZPaul has meta-politically “red-pilled” thousands of young men.

      Dave Lane writes lesbian spanking porn in Federal Supermax Prison.

      There isn’t going to be a violent revolution, and on the slim, slim chance there is one, it sure as hell is not going to be planned on the public internet.

      So, anyone talking about violent revolution on the internet is, essentially, masturbating in public.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Mike
        February 7, 2016

        People must be arning themselves just for fun then and the rape of europeans is just an out of date prelude of demographic flirtation on the part of the invader, how silly of me not to see that.


      • icareviews
        February 7, 2016

        Hear that, folks? Arn yourselves!

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        February 7, 2016

        When I lived in America everyone was armed since they were 18.

        You can’t get Europeans to vote against pro-immigration politicians, how are you going to get them to “rise up against the government?”

        Who is going to fight this violent revolution anyway? You and your buddy?

        If someone was serious about something like that, they would be organizing among active military people.

        They wouldn’t be talking to random people on the internet certainly.


      • Adit
        February 17, 2016

        The problem is that most people seem to be the ‘one tool’ type. When the only tool you have is hammer, every problem looks like a nail. If you’re a propagandist, you think you can talk the enemy to death. If you believe in ‘hot lead’ every problem can be solved by judicious use of a bullet. These things are just plain tools, nothing more. The problem is using the right tool at the right time in the correct way. From what I’ve observed, most people don’t have the talent to know which tool to use, let alone how to use it correctly. Never discard any tool because it’s of no use today. Things change and it could be problematic if you need a hammer and all you have is an Allen key.


    • eyeslevel
      February 8, 2016

      Mike, how did the anti-whites take power?

      You can’t solve a problem until you identify it.

      How did the anti-whites take power?


      • Mike
        February 8, 2016

        “How did the anti-whites take power?”

        Whites gave up theirs.

        For a start the white man gave up control over his basic needs for use of a foreign system, he stopped toiling the land.

        Man’s basic needs are being used against him, plus in depth knowledge of human behavior when presented with certain conditions is being abused by those who have gained the trust of the white man.

        Its really simple stuff but people seem to be slightly warped by their own intellectual sophistry at the ministry of grammar police to see clear evidence of it.

        Why would a government now wish to dis-arm americans, if everyone from 18 plus is already armed?

        What is voting anyway without a follow up of action?


      • eyeslevel
        February 8, 2016

        Try again, Mike. Think a little bit.


      • Hipster Racist
        February 8, 2016


        I say it was the media. as MacDonald has often noted, there was a major immigration restriction in the 1920s – when radio was still new and TV hadn’t been invented.

        TV shows up in the 1960s, and within the decade we had the anti-white immigration reform of 1968.

        It took one generation of TV brainwashing to suppress white racial consciousness. All other opinions were simply banned from the media.

        Of course, the internet is bringing it back, one blog post at a time.


      • eyeslevel
        February 9, 2016

        What’s the first thing the anti-whites do if you say something pro-white?


      • Adit
        February 17, 2016


        The anti-white propaganda was already in full swing during WWII. Go watch a bunch of American war movies made during the war and its so blatant, it’s like being hit with a propaganda sledge hammer. Interestingly, the few British ones I’ve seen though are more of the “do it for king and country” type. They’re so generic you could replace ‘jerry’ or ‘jap’ with any other group and nothing would change about the flick. The whole anti-white narrative is passed off as ‘Americanism’ in the American films. We’re all Americans so if your daughter won’t screw a nigger you’re helping the Axis! Trator! Nazi sympathizer! Lol. Its no wonder the 60s ended up the way it did when the parents already had their brains pickled.


  8. thrasymachus33308
    February 6, 2016

    I’m not sure how far the Trump/Giuliani parallel can be pushed, but what was the run up to Giuliani’s election like? I’m guessing he got a lot of the same grief Trump gets, fascist, etc, but deep down the New York liberals knew somebody needed to clean up the mess all the bleeding heart idiots from Lindsey to Dinkins made. They would never admit this publicly, and probably not even privately, but I think that’s what they were thinking.

    Giuliani wasn’t anybody’s idea of a conservative- outside of New York anyway- but he was the most conservative possible candidate who could be elected in New York. Trump is neither a conservative, maybe not even a moderate, but if TPTB think they need to roll back the craziness for a few years and Trump can do it while providing plausible deniability- of course they are against this evil fascist!- it is at least better than the alternative.

    I wouldn’t be so sure too many of these people are trolls- some people just don’t have a filter, particularly if they come from a lower class background, particularly if they think they are anonymous. Or they are trolls, but not of an intentional sort, they just like saying taboo words.


    • icareviews
      February 6, 2016

      I don’t think powerful Jews would be at all upset by a Trump presidency, but I still think Hillary is more attractive to the high finance types. I’m sure she would also be acceptable to most neocons since she’s essentially one of them apart from her socially liberal posturing. The die-hard Ziohawks clearly don’t want her, though. I’m not committing myself to a prediction, but I still think she has a better chance than Trump.


      • Mike
        February 6, 2016

        The jews political game of “heads I win, tales you lose”

        Once you have a Communist Negro “presiding” over a land mass as big as the USA still with white majority demographic, then you must surely know its only going to get worse before it gets better (if at all it does).


    • Hipster Racist
      February 6, 2016


      Giuliani was a product of the “liberal” elites in NYC, he was hired to stop the black and brown crime and to clean up some of institutionalized decay: the strip clubs, the vice, the homeless camps, etc.

      Sure, lots of people screamed “fascist” but most people who were not delinquents knew it was necessary. He was broadly popular for his entire two terms, and might have even won a third election if Bloomberg hadn’t stopped him.

      they just like saying taboo words.

      Yeah, well, there’s 4chan for that sort of thing.


  9. Pingback: Organized Slime: Political Mutants Trump and Bloomberg Blow Muck-Bubbles of Mockumentary Media Bombast-Bluster-Bunkum | Hipster Racist

  10. fuhrerious88
    February 8, 2016

    Reblogged this on Remember The 14 Words..


  11. Pingback: Organized Slime: Political Mutants Trump and Bloomberg Blow Muck-Bubbles of Mockumentary Media Bombast-Bluster-Bunkum | Celto-Germanic Romance

  12. Pingback: Supermarket Superstar: Trump and the Tabloids | Aryan Skynet

  13. Pingback: Reasons Not to Like Donald Trump from a Jew-Wise Racialist Perspective – Think Racially

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: