Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Information Comintern: Library Gatekeepers as Agents of Cultural Marxist Demoralization, Critical Rot, and Conformity


Chelsea Hubbell, whose speaking fees reportedly soar as high as $75,000, addresses a conference of the American Library Association

America’s public and academic libraries have always served as the clearing houses of the prevailing political orthodoxies and government-driven agendas of the day, and the influential Library of Congress is no exception. For instance, in January of 2010 – the year that would see the implementation of Obama’s bloody Afghanistan troop surge, and well after it had become apparent that the new administration had no intention of rolling back Bush’s neocon foreign policy – the Library of Congress changed the subject heading “War on Terrorism, 2001-” to “War on Terrorism, 2001-2009”, thereby absolving Obama for his continuation of the Iraq and Afghanistan adventures and giving the wholly specious impression that a neatly defined cycle of international conflict had come to a close.


(((Sari Feldman))), President of the American Library Association

The federal and local governments of the United States are increasingly aggressive in their promotion of the demographic dispossession of white Americans through both legal and illegal means, and public libraries, less frequently patronized as book depositories and free video rental outlets now that people are getting more and more of their information and entertainment online, have been happy collaborators in the globalist sanctuary city agenda, hoping to increase usage statistics by catering to the non-white invader populations with Spanish language movies, books, and children’s programs made available at local taxpayers’ expense. Public libraries also serve as unofficial homeless shelters, in some cases even handing out free food. A Mexican hobo regularly loiters in this writer’s local public library, and this is the scene at libraries across the United States.





This woman is offended by your use of the term “illegal alien”. Try to be a little more sensitive, won’t you?

Now the American Library Association, a shameless lobby representing the country’s noisiest practitioners of something they dub “library and information science”, has passed a motion to petition the Library of Congress to change its official subject heading “Illegal Aliens” to “Undocumented Immigrants”. The ALA alleges in its resolution that the former wording has “undergone pejoration and acquired derogatory connotations, becoming increasingly associated with nativist and racist sentiments” and that “referring to undocumented immigrants as ‘illegal’ is increasingly viewed as dehumanizing, offensive, inflammatory, and even a racial slur”. Furthermore, notes the resolution, ALA policy B.3 (“Diversity”) states that the organization “recognizes the critical need for access to library and information resources, services, and technologies by all people, especially those who may experience […] discrimination”.



Laura Koltutsky

Listed as the “Mover” of the resolution is a Canadian, Laura Koltutsky, a librarian at the University of Calgary. The document gives no explanation of how this foreign national presumes to enjoy moral jurisdiction over cataloging procedures in public institutions in the United States; but, given the ALA’s undisguised contempt for national borders, one assumes that Koltutsky considers herself a citizen of the world and at liberty, therefore, to insinuate herself into the policymaking of any country she pleases. She is an officer of the ALA’s “Social Responsibilities Round Table”, which, according to its webpage, works to establish “progressive priorities” for librarianship and to “help solve social problems and inequities in order to […] bolster democracy.” It would seem that in order to be properly bolstered, democracy in America must be made to divest itself of its notions of citizenship, territorial integrity, and national sovereignty. To do otherwise would be “racist”, “dehumanizing”, “inflammatory”, and “offensive” to ethnic-alien Canadian sensibilities.


                                                                                              (((Social Responsibilities Round Table officers)))


Koltutsky’s native Canada hardly has a sterling reputation when it comes to intellectual freedom. Free speech advocate Arthur Topham was recently prosecuted on grounds of alleged incitement of hatred in that northerly Xanadu of “progressive” enlightenment simply for publishing The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion and other controversial works on his website. Did open society advocate Koltutsky or any of her peers in the “Social Responsibilities Round Table”, the broad membership of the ALA, or the library and “information science” professions generally come to Topham’s aid in making the case for tolerance of intellectual diversity in accordance with ALA policy B.3 (“Diversity”), which, as quoted earlier, “recognizes the critical need for access to […] information resources […] by all people, especially those who may experience […] discrimination”? Could any group be more susceptible to discrimination in the Zionist-occupied West of the twenty-first century than those who dare to criticize the Jews?



Survey the online catalogs of the public libraries in this country and one thing will immediately be apparent. These institutions, despite their disingenuous lip service to the ideals of “diversity” and of free access to information, promote a rigid conformity when it comes to the selection of titles for public collections. The lion’s share of public libraries’ collection development budgets goes toward the purchase of huge New York publishing giants’ products and thus promotes a corporate state agenda. A quick search of WorldCat indicates that no public libraries in America own The ISIS Conspiracy by Brandon Martinez, Face to Face with Race by Jared Taylor, False Flags by Michael Collins Piper, or The Holocaust Hoax Exposed by Victor Thorn. Libraries all over the world hold copies of Mark Owen’s Hollywood-sanctified No Easy Day: The Autobiography of a Navy SEAL or Meyer Levin’s government-endorsed novel The Diary of Anne Frank, and even a variety of readers’ guides for better understanding the “diary”; but in very few collections in the United States, with all of its lavishly funded big city libraries, will a reader find access to former U.S. Representative Cynthia McKinney’s The Illegal War on Libya or independent researcher Ditlieb Felderer’s study, Anne Frank’s Diary – A Hoax.




Bland Book Week

The ALA, with great fanfare, sponsors an annual Banned Books Week; but the titles spotlighted by this promotion are inevitably readily available books that simply happen to have been challenged at some time, and none of these books are actually “banned”. Participants play at make-believe civil disobedience by reading some big seller like Toni Morrison’s novel Beloved, thereby showing – or so they think – their dedication to the freedom of thought and expression. If, however, a book has never been banned because it was never given the chance to be challenged, how is that not a de facto ban? How, again, does this regime of shadow-censorship exhibit the ALA’s expressed concerns about access to information and capital-D “Diversity”? “Holocaust denial” remains a risky proposition in Koltutsky’s native Canada. Where is her idealistic outrage, and that of her fellow library and “information science” professionals, when confronted with such a continuing scandal? Thankfully, the still-free internet – at least here in the United States – is making authoritarian information gatekeepers of the Koltutsky type into an increasingly irrelevant annoyance.


Information Scientist

Rainer Chlodwig von Kook


About icareviews

Author, Protocols of the Elders of Zanuck: Psychological Warfare and Filth at the Movies

9 comments on “Information Comintern: Library Gatekeepers as Agents of Cultural Marxist Demoralization, Critical Rot, and Conformity

  1. icareviews
    January 16, 2016

    Reblogged this on icareviews.


  2. Hipster Racist
    January 16, 2016

    The ALA alleges in its resolution that the former wording has “undergone pejoration and acquired derogatory connotations, becoming increasingly associated with nativist and racist sentiments” and that “referring to undocumented immigrants as ‘illegal’ is increasingly viewed as dehumanizing, offensive, inflammatory, and even a racial slur”.

    Leftists are White Supremacists; they believe that every person of every race and every culture is really just a Nice White Liberal deep down inside, and just need ‘education’ to bring their internal Nice White Liberal out.

    You’re dealing with narcissism on an unimaginable scale. This also has some obvious religious connotations as well.

    America is the “universal nation” – everyone is a “pre-American” who simply needs the proper documentation. It’s just another form of colonialism; instead of colonizing lands they want to colonize people.

    Instead of importing “refugees” into America, why not start making these conquered nations states? We could give Iraq, Syria, and Mexico two Senators, representation in Congress, and the full rights and powers of any other states.

    See, they would cry “colonialism” at that but it’s not particularly different than what they are doing.

    Liked by 1 person

    • indravaruna
      January 16, 2016

      You said before that would be easier to recruit former Liberals to our cause than Cuckservatives, more I think about more I agree.

      Liked by 2 people

      • bookooball
        January 17, 2016

        Cuckservative is the new Libtard, and whites are the new Jews.


  3. Pingback: Information Comintern: Library Gatekeepers as Agents of Cultural Marxist Demoralization, Critical Rot, and Conformity | Hipster Racist

  4. kerberos616
    January 16, 2016

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.


  5. smartwhiteguy
    January 17, 2016

    That Laura Koltutsky looks like she had downs syndrome. With that Polish name and inbred features it’s safe to deduce she must be kosher.
    Around here it seems almost all library employees are either jews or negroes. But again, we are very progressive out here. I think that only New York city is more loony left than we are here in the SF gay area.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. helvena
    January 17, 2016

    Reblogged this on Pound by Pound and commented:

    Liked by 1 person

  7. 0jr
    February 12, 2016

    People have been permanently banned from some libraries for visiting these types of sites on library computers


Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: