Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

The Invasion of Europe

With Open Gates: The forced collective suicide of European nations

InvasionOfEurope

Advertisements

27 comments on “The Invasion of Europe

  1. icareviews
    November 15, 2015

    Thanks for making me angry again. I’m pretty sure my blood pressure shot up on watching that first video, but none of us can afford to become complacent. Each of us knows at least one person – actually, probably most of the people in our acquaintance – who are like that useful idiot described by Bezmenov, who even in the face of new evidence, will refuse to relinquish illusions of faith; but we might also know someone who, while not redpilled, shows signs of discomfort with the establishment line. Convincing those people is what this is all about.

    The Jonestown cult is an appropriate correlative; but I’m actually not entirely sure what Jonestown really was after watching the pertinent segment of Evidence of Revision. Did you happen to see that?

    Liked by 3 people

    • Hipster Racist
      November 15, 2015

      Yes, I slogged through all five hours of Evidence of Revision.

      It was … illuminating, to say the least. I think people can figure out what I think on some of these issues by reading my fiction at http://hipsterintelligenceagency.wordpress.com and the Flogging Miley series at http://hipsterracist.wordpress.com/tag/flogging-miley.

      But as the late great A. Nolen always said, you hardly need anything so exotic as drugs or torture. You control the society, you control the mind. If people spend four hours a day watching TV, you control the TV, you control their mind.

      When it gets controversial is the smart, educated, “conservative” White men. Tell them their “serious news programs” like FOX or CNN are just as fictional as the sit-coms and they will go apeshit. That’s a “conspiracy theory.” Sure maybe the liberals or the women are easily fooled, but not our hard-headed, tough-minded conservative, even a bit cynical White men!

      LOL – of course they are the easiest to brainwash. They are the people who marched into machine gun fire during World War I because … some guy in a uniform told them to.

      Liked by 2 people

      • icareviews
        November 15, 2015

        Evidence of Revision is a mixed bag, but I recommend it to anybody who hasn’t seen it. The visual effects are annoying and crappy, and some stretches of it feel reeeeeally long; but it’s a good place to start getting into the 60s assassinations. Some of the angles it takes or the insinuations of racist motivations are stupid, but there’s much more good than bad to be had. There was a movie in the 70s, Executive Action, that was co-written by JFK researcher Mark Lane, who wrote the book and made the documentary Rush to Judgment – and this movie, Executive Action, is interesting from the speculative standpoint of getting the feel of what the texture of an assassination conspiracy might have looked like – but where it goes off the rails and gets stupid is in charging that white supremacists wanted progressive Kennedy dead and were willing to put Mr. Great Society himself, Lyndon Johnson, in power just to get back at JFK for letting the blacks get uppity. It’s boring to keep running into this Alex Jones conspiracy stuff about crypto-Nazis and fascists secretly running the world. Because flooding Germany with blacks and Arabs is totally what Hitler would do if he were pulling the strings of the banking and military-industrial-infotainment establishment.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. icareviews
    November 15, 2015

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Pingback: The Invasion of Europe | Hipster Racist

  4. Reallynewguy
    November 16, 2015

    This video is a very eye-opening look into the Islamic invasion of Europe. I’m very happy that those Breitbart people actually exposed bluepilled conservatives to this. That they’ve seen Barba Spectre admitting the Jewish role is not a tiny thing. They would usually not even give “antisemitism” the time of day.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      November 16, 2015

      @Reallynewguy

      Notice in that breitbart thread when the one guy starts bringing up Jews, a few people start calling him “Ahmed” – because only Muslims would be “anti-semitic” and it’s Christian saving the Jews from the Muslims.

      He does push back a bit, calling the guy “Chaim” (that’s my favorite, thanks to Charlie Sheen.) But he unfortunately starts posting irrelevant crap from the Talmud, stuff about “the best of the goyim should be killed” etc.

      What is this, 12th Century France? Is he debating some inbred rabbi in Brooklyn with the curly locks or something? The Jews that matter, the ones that have power, they don’t give a shit about the Talmud and have likely never even read it.

      The Jews that have power – Michael Bloomberg, Janet Yellin, Jamie Dimon, Lloyd Blankfein, and the elites of academic anti-Whiteness – they don’t read the Talmud.

      Thankfully, Kevin MacDonald has given us an entire vocabulary with which to discuss modern Jewish power and Jewish identity. He’s given us a cruise missle, yet so many are romantically longing for the days of bows and arrows.

      Breitbart a central node of neo-connism. They are “not racist” they are just “against jihad” because “Muslims are the real racists.”

      They are against any ethno-states – except Israel. Israel for Jews, European countries for everybody (except Muslims.)

      That’s why they have to police sites such as that so tightly because the narrative falls apart the second these taboos are discovered.

      Liked by 2 people

      • icareviews
        November 16, 2015

        Talking about the Talmud is relevant to today’s world because it presents evidence of the continuity of Jewish hatred of gentiles over millennia. Michael Bloomberg and Lloyd Blankfein, you’re right, probably couldn’t care less about its contents; but Jews’ psychology is informed by a heritage of ethnic hostility (and, of course, pedophilia) dating back to the rabbinic authors of the books of the Talmud and beyond.

        I consider the unsavory contents of the Talmud to be especially pertinent to the task of undermining the neoconservative grip on white America. Evangelical Republicans like the jerks who visit sites along the lines of Breitbart, Weasel Zippers, and Front Page Mag think Jews are magic. I even know a man who told me his church is “Israel-oriented”. Not Jesus-oriented, but Israel-oriented. Just imagine how American politics would shift overnight if all of these idiots found a copy of Jesus in the Talmud in the mailbox. It wouldn’t be as easy as that, of course, but I don’t think it hurts to drop a strategic reference to Talmud on Twitter now and then.

        Increasingly, journalists are acknowledging the upsurge of white nationalist edgelords on Twitter. The other day I actually saw Debbie Schlussel retweet some Jew soap trolling from somebody called Grandpa Lampshade. This stuff is great if you ask me. Any way we can exploit the audience of establishment media is a chance we ought to grab, so talking about the racism in the Talmud in a bluepilled website’s comments section sounds okay by me. We’re living in a world in which a Hollywood star like Seth Rogen, a guy with millions of followers, actually retweeted white nationalist shitlordery. What’s not to like?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        November 16, 2015

        if all of these idiots found a copy of Jesus in the Talmud in the mailbox.

        It wouldn’t make the slightest bit of difference. I know a Christian Zionist than actually spent a thousand dollars on a hard bound set of the Zohar. He didn’t read any of it, it was merely to signal to others than he knew more about Judaism than his fellow church-goers. Traditionally, to Christians the Zohar is “Satanic” – but it doesn’t matter to these people because it’s just a prop in their LARPing.

        Explain the Talmud to these types and they will just say, “well that’s why we need to support Israel, so Jesus will come back and the Jews will know who their Messiah is.”

        You are not dealing with rational people who care about the truth. You are dealing with, at best, cult members, and quite often perfectly dishonest scam artists that don’t believe any of this stuff but know it’s good for some bucks.

        As a commenter once told me, “I knew a student at a well known Evangelical college, he said ‘I don’t believe any of this stuff but I have an English degree and I’ll be damned if I wait tables for the rest of my life.'”

        To these people, the Bible is irrelevant in their everyday lives, so at the least they can turn on the TV coverage of the Middle East and see something with a vague connection to their Bible stories.

        Before the collapse of the USSR, these people sided with the Muslims against the “atheist Communists.” After 9/11, they turned on the Muslims and just changed “Gog and Magog” from Russia to Iran.

        They don’t care, they are stupid and dishonest people.

        Steven Anderson and Faithful Word Baptist Church may be able to get through to them, so then they will revert to good “anti-racist” Christians who don’t support Israel because of how “racist” it is.

        Out of the frying pan, into the fire.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Reallynewguy
        November 16, 2015

        The hard part arguing with neocons is that saying race matters, or that Jews aren’t awesome is that they filter that to Leftist! It’s great to see push back against the “antisemitism is leftist” meme. I agree that the Jews today are more likely secular, cultural jews than religious jews. Breitbarters would call you a “nazi” for thinking whites should have an all-white state, but are fine with Israel doing the same.

        Liked by 3 people

      • indravaruna
        November 17, 2015

        The Kabbalism and its “Holy Book” the Zohar are hilarious, its basically a bunch Neo-Platonist non-sense mixed jewish angeology mumbo jumbo, the Zohar was in fact written in Medieval Spain by a crazy Rabbi, he wrote it in Aramaic to make it appear of greater antiquity.

        This zionist-israeli blogger even makes fun of the Zohar: http://h2oreuse.blogspot.com.br/2015/10/jewish-metaphysics.html

        Liked by 1 person

      • eyeslevel
        November 17, 2015

        Which is going to be more politically effective-

        A: Quoting some Talmud verse, or
        B: Saying “Israel for Jews, white countries for EVERYBODY?!”

        Liked by 2 people

    • Hipster Racist
      November 16, 2015

      Look at this in context. We’re talking about a Breitbart (neo-con) thread about this video. One of “our guys” started out doing a good job, pointing out that Jews in Europe are promoting these migrants, while their fellow Jews in Israel support apartheid and ethno-nationalism.

      Pointing out that hypocrisy is effective.

      Then, he went off script and started quoting the ten or so well known Talmudic verses that “anti-semites” love to quote. All they have to do is say, “no the Talmud doesn’t say that,” or “you are interpreting it wrong,” or “I’m not religious anyway, why do you hate Jews?”

      In certain context pointing out the “supremacism” of the Talmud might be effective – on a breitbart.com thread, it’s counter-productive.

      Take it from a guy who spent decades in New York City working in the financial industry, in fact, a guy who has dated more than one Jewess, some just a step away from the ghettos of Brooklyn. They don’t care about obscure verses in the Talmud anymore than your average “Christian” cares about obscure verses in the Old Testament.

      The ones who can argue with you about obscure religious topics love nothing more than to argue about it – but like wrestling with a pig, you just annoy the pig and wind up covered in shit.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Zobbo
    November 16, 2015

    Small disagreement here. Of course powerful jews don’t have the talmud as their bedside book but they’re nevertheless well versed into it and have studied it at one point or another, be it in yeshivas (also called talmudic schools) or through teaching by their rabbis.
    It’s impossile for a jew to reach an important position in the jewish power structure without thourough knowledge of the talmudic laws. Because those are the laws that teach them how to interact with goyim and how to navigate into goyim societies.
    And when they encounter a difficult/unexpected situation, they turn to their rabbis for guidance.
    At least this is how it is in France for all the important sayanim like BHL or Attali (who started as rabbinic student). Maybe you’ve heard about them? I think BHL is well known in the States).
    I do believe the same pattern can be found just about everywhere else, including the USA.
    Check this :
    http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2009/11/09/goldman-chief-says-he-is-just-doing-gods-work/?_r=0
    Lloys Blankfein explainig that as the CEO of Goldman Sachs he’s doing god’s work.
    Not meaning he’s observing the ten commandments here, but a message to jewry worldwide saying he’s serving (the eternal) Israel and obeying yahwe by enslaving goyim through usury.
    Deuteronomy 15 :
    “At the end of every seven years you must cancel debts. This is how it is to be done: Every creditor shall cancel any loan they have made to a fellow Israelite. They shall not require payment from anyone among their own people, because the LORD’s time for canceling debts has been proclaimed. 3 You may require payment from a foreigner (note : any goy), but you must cancel any debt your fellow Israelite owes you.”

    Still, I believe quotes of the talmud shoudn’t be used in any argument because it’s hard to find any sound references for them. So if you do, just like for the “Protocols”, the risk is you’ll be called a liar using forgery.
    My advice is to get references from 3 books of the Old Testament – Deuteronomy, Levitucus, Numbers. Plenty enough incriminating stuff in it. Added benefit, you can have a lot of fun with Christian Zionists by rubbing their nose in it.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Hipster Racist
      November 16, 2015

      No, when Blankfein said he was doing God’s work, he was suggesting that he’s creating jobs, thus helping average people. In the context of the rest of his speech that’s what he meant.

      Outside of the Hassids, most Jews don’t know nor care about the Talmud. Sure, they still retain their traditions, their segregation, kosher foods, and the like. But the list of Talmud verses that “anti-semites” like to quote are meaningless to them.

      What non-Hassidic Jews know are the holidays and the stories behind them, certain taboos (like kosher food) and the idea that they are “chosen” and everyone else is “goyim” to be suckered.

      They *love* to keep people spinning their wheels, “we’re a religion, no, a culture, no an ethnicity!”

      Liked by 1 person

  6. indravaruna
    November 17, 2015

    The Kalergi Plan is the origin of the EU, Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi was a mixed race aristocrat married to a jewess (a fact that his Wikipedia page don’t mention) he had connections with the jewish bankers in Wall Street and London and several politicians across Europe.

    The Victor Lazlo character from the Casablanca movie was based on Kalergi, the elites during inter-War to WWII period are aware of the Kalergi Plan, the Nazis saw it as Freemasonic plot to control Europe, he definitely was a well networked among the Western elites, the EU is the Soviet Union for Western Europe but with more Race mixing.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Nikolaus_von_Coudenhove-Kalergi

    I recommend reading his whole Wiki page but this is the meat and potatoes:

    “In his book Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), he wrote:”

    “The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.”

    “Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility by the Grace of Spirit. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation.”

    —–

    Liked by 1 person

  7. eyeslevel
    November 17, 2015

    This is not a Muslim issue.

    Muslims did not invade by force of arms. Anti-white traitors in power LET THEM IN. They get away with it because they have propaganda superiority. After decades of anti-white propaganda, they have most white people in a brainwashed trance where they are afraid to be call racist, Nazi and are therefore unable to defend themselves. This form of psychological warfare is called demoralization and is explained by Yuri Bezmenov in this video:

    Though he’s talking about Marxist propaganda, everything he says applies to anti-white propaganda. It’s not about educating. Facts mean nothing to a demoralized person. They have to be deprogrammed through repetition of carefully crafted talking points. Only then can they be educated.

    Muslims have no power. They have no Navy, Air Force, Industry to speak of, no supply lines, barely any media presence. Muslims aren’t throwing pro-white Germans in jail, it’s their own government. Brown Muslims are biological weapons used by anti-whites in power to force blend white people out of existence. This is the case whether they commit terrorist acts or not, whether they commit any crime at all or not.

    Let’s say after years of anti-Muslim agitation you managed to change public opinion to the point where your governments were forced to stop the Muslim invasion. Anti-whites in power would then just flood you with non-white Christians, animist, Hindus, atheists and Buddhists.

    Some anti-whites in power are Jews, but most of them are white traitors.

    This is not a Muslim issue. It’s pro-white vs. anti-white.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. eyeslevel
    November 17, 2015

    It’s not about being anti-immigration. Would anyone have a problem with accepting white refugees from South Africa?

    It’s pro-white vs. anti-white.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. eyeslevel
    November 17, 2015

    Just saying “Europe for whites! Deport refugees!” doesn’t give you the moral high ground, doesn’t point out the internal contradictions of the anti-white system, and doesn’t tap into white people’s innate sense of fairness. Saying “Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, white countries for everybody?!” does all three.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Alex the Goon
      November 17, 2015

      I’ve never liked the “X for X, Y for Y, Z for Z, YT for Everyone” line. As a bumper sticker slogan, it reads like an endorsement — “Yes. Yes. Yes. Yes. Um, Yes?” When the cucks you’re trying to convert read that, their anal canals self-lubricate — “Yes, White countries for Everyone! XOXO How GOOD we are!”. Repetition also has a brainwashing effect, as the unceasing recitation of 1984 and Animal Farm slogans has rendered everyone numb and resigned to our defeat, thus making them self-fulfilling prophecies.
      Anyhow, I don’t give a damn about moral high ground. I don’t care if the foreigners are terrorists or peaceful monks; if they are welfare sponges or hard-working tax generating machines. I want to live with my own people, period. If Asia, Africa, Mexico, and every other shithole on Earth opened themselves to White neighbors, White businesses, and White rule (nullifying the X for X premise), that doesn’t change the fact that I want a White nation for myself and my family. Also, our past colonial endeavors serve to neuter the X for X, because our enemies use it to say “Shoe’s on the other foot now. Suck it.”

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 17, 2015

        I don’t give a damn about moral high ground.

        Most White people do, and they have the high ground. The last thing we need is people signaling how amoral they are. It’s just posturing.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 17, 2015

        “Shoe’s on the other foot now. Suck it.”

        Whatever White people did in the past, it doesn’t justify White genocide now.

        The Mantra talking points have already covered all your objections, over and over again. Don’t forget, they were developed by professionals that got paid the big bucks to do this.

        Unless you have a history of being paid big bucks to develop marketing strategies, you aren’t an expert, so it pays to pay attention to those who are experts.

        Like

      • Alex the Goon
        November 18, 2015

        Those people only think they hold the high ground because they postured themselves up there. It is not intrinsically more moral to sacrifice your own self-interests to a usurper who would never extend the same courtesy to yourself; it is stupid and suicidal.
        I don’t believe the marketing strategies, or the geniuses behind them, made the difference; it was the distribution. If those same assets were instead used to broadcast and propagandize the boomer youth with Mom, Apple Pie, White Bread and God and Country, that’s what we would have today.
        Take for example, our response to 9/11. If our leaders had seized that event as an opportunity to rid the country of muslims and seal the borders, it would have happened, and with no second thought to the muffled wails of the ACLU or SPLC or CAIR. Instead, the immediate message from The Top was “Don’t discriminate against muslims, mow your elderly neighbor’s lawn, and go shopping.” Soon after came the objectiveless wars (unless chaos was their objective). A lot of big professional experts got paid a lot of big bucks to make those policies, but that didn’t make those policies wise or successful. It was the resources behind them that made it all happen, which 7.3 years later culminated with a foreign-born muslim taking over the White House, to wreak yet more havoc, with the help of yet more big highly-paid professional experts.
        Anyway, I don’t know if this ended up where I intended to take it. Suffice to say, they’ve got their boot on our face, and appealing to fairness and moral authority will only make them laugh.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 18, 2015

        We are not trying to appeal to the anti-whites nor trying to change their minds. We are appealing to white people. White people are swayed by moral arguments; that’s how the anti-whites have been able to push diversity and anti-whiteness, by making moral arguments.

        We have anti-whites saying “whiteness is evil and diversity is good.” Coming along and saying, “be evil, fucks morality” isn’t going to work. In fact, it hasn’t worked.

        Like

  10. eyeslevel
    November 17, 2015

    “Multiculturalism doesn’t work.” Actually, it works perfectly at what it was always intended to do: push white genocide.

    When you say “multiculturalism doesn’t work” you’re assuming the people pushing it are honest. They’re not. They never were.

    When you say “multiculturalism doesn’t work” you’re reinforcing anti-white terminology. You’re assuming multiculturalism was something legitimate to begin with. It never was. It was always an anti-white genocidal scam.

    “Multiculturalism” is never pushed on non-whites.

    Weaponized anti-white terminology has to be DESTROYED, not reinforced.

    Don’t say “multiculturalism doesn’t work.” Say “multiculturalism is a genocidal scam. Multiculturalism is a code word for white genocide.”

    Liked by 2 people

  11. eyeslevel
    November 19, 2015

    This is what we want to show up on the screens of the anti-white apparatchiks when they go to work and turn on their computers:

    Liked by 2 people

  12. Pingback: 2014 Going On 1984 | Aryan Skynet

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: