Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

You Must Be This Tall To Ride

This is the entry test for Aryan Skynet agents.

Please watch this lecture by Kevin MacDonald from the recent National Policy Institute Conference, “Become Who You Are.”

Take as long as you need, rewatch and take notes if you need to, then make a comment below.

Just like how harsh winters influenced the evolution of White men towards high IQs and an analytic bent, so your ability to pay attention, understand, and comprehend what Dr. MacDonald is saying shows that you are, in fact, White, and are, in fact, smart enough to join the European “mannerbund” – the warrior tribe – based on your abilities as opposed to just who your parents were.

Be warned: MacDonald’s speaking style is not “Hollywood ready.” He tends to sway at the podium thus lose the microphone a bit. He doesn’t use rhetorical flourishes and has a relatively dry delivery.

He also only discusses White people – Aryans – Europeans. He doesn’t discuss Africans or Jews. So if you are more interested in Africans and Jews, there are probably other websites more on your level.

MacDonald does not engage in using racial slurs against non-European people nor harshly negative stereotypes. So if you are more interested in pictures of ugly Africans, or Ashkenazis with bigger schnozzes, or talking about “kikenvermin” and “niggers” there are certainly plenty of other websites you may enjoy.

MacDonald does not discuss homosexuality or the finer details of gay anal sex, so if that is your thing, feel free to go elsewhere.

However, if you are interested in why White – Aryan – people are the way we are, both our strengths and our weaknesses, and how hostile anti-whites have used some of our better qualities against us, this is the place.

And Kevin MacDonald’s research on the Origin of European Man is where you will learn it.

Ready? You may begin.

http://www.radixjournal.com/blog/2015/11/12/the-origins-of-the-white-man

Advertisements

21 comments on “You Must Be This Tall To Ride

  1. icareviews
    November 12, 2015

    Any honest Aryan with a degree of introspection will be able to diagnose the causes of many of the mistakes they’ve made in life in the mixed legacy of psychological inheritances and moral heritages MacDonald ascribes to the Indo-Europeans. Modern whites, as he articulates, still exhibit many of these ancient traits, but in distorted, misdirected, or exaggerated manifestations. It was highly individualistic and also evocative of the old Indo-European self-assurance MacDonald describes, for instance, that the scholar could take to the podium with his hair looking so Warholish, without first stopping to check his appearance in a mirror or considering what effect this might have on his audience or the reputation of his family or tribe. Must have been a windy day in D.C.

    Like

  2. icareviews
    November 12, 2015

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  3. Hipster Racist
    November 12, 2015

    MacDonald’s recent work on the origin of European man discussed these two “tendencies” in our psychological makeup. First, there is the “egalitarian individualism” of the Northern hunter-gatherer tribes. Second, there is the “Indo-European” type, clustered more around Southern and Eastern Europe which is still somewhat egalitarian in a sense, but much more hierarchical.

    We see these two exact types play out constantly, all the time. As far as religious institutions, the Quakers are the ultimate example of the first type, no hierarchy, egalitarian individualism, de-emphasis on blood ties and an emphasis on individual reputation. Sweden’s “Junte Laws” are another example of this type.

    The second type? What is more Indo-European than the Roman Catholic church, with its self-selected hierarchy and imperialism?

    It’s not about the religion, it’s about the types of organizations that we form. You will find a very similar pattern if you read about corporate management theory. After all, corporations are just another form of institution created by White people. You will also find similar patterns in political parties or social groups. You will find similar patterns in the old fraternal groups that used to be quite popular in America, the Lion’s Clubs, the Freemasons, etc.

    One of the reasons it is so hard to get Whites to organize in our own interests is that “pro-White” isn’t really part of “egalitarian individualism.” Blood ties don’t matter, individual actions and reputations matter. That’s why the very White Republican base loves White-presenting Blacks like Ben Carson – there is an instinct to include outsiders if they adopt our moral standards and cultural ways.

    It’s not a good habit, it just *is* – and organized Jewry has weaponized this against us.

    One of the things MacDonald has stressed recently is that “moral” attacks against us are so effective precisely because of this psychological makeup. So, as pro-Whites, to get anywhere we MUST make a moral case for our interests. LARPing as an amoral “might makes right” Nietzschean or worshipping power like some pseudo-elitist NRXer is never going to work. We must make a MORAL case for our interests, because that is how White people think.

    That’s one reason why Bob Whitaker’s Mantra rhetoric is so effective. It calls out the hypocrisy of the anti-Whites, and White people are allergic to hypocrisy. It makes a moral case for White interests by putting them in the context of the interests of everyone else. Chinese people have China, so why can’t White people have White countries, etc.

    Like

    • icareviews
      November 12, 2015

      “So, as pro-Whites, to get anywhere we MUST make a moral case for our interests. LARPing as an amoral “might makes right” Nietzschean or worshipping power like some pseudo-elitist NRXer is never going to work. We must make a MORAL case for our interests, because that is how White people think.”

      At the same time, whites retain much of that Indo-European “fame and fortune” mentality that MacDonald mentions. The warrior and Faustian spirits are misdirected at present, but hardly extinct. This is one reason David Duke’s entirely moral shtick is less than compelling for me. I like and admire his work, but he comes across as a total pansy. Even Mitt Romney’s dubious manliness puts Duke’s to shame on at least the superficial level. Ron Paul was an easy target for patriotards for similar reasons. My neocon Christian Zionist coworker’s principal objection to Ron Paul in 2012 was that he saw Paul as a “pussy”. He wasn’t for war and hence wasn’t a man. I wouldn’t propose that whites go full Mussolini in composing their policies and rhetoric, but that Faustian spirit is going to be an essential ingredient of any sort of effective resistance.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 12, 2015

        Sure, white people love a winner, white people love courageous, aggressive, masculine men.

        Ever notice, however, that even when White countries go to war, it’s always for a “moral” reason? America never goes to war for oil. No, America goes to war for “democracy” or to “stop Osama Bin Hitler Hussein” or to “fight radical ISIS terrorists who kill children.” Etc.

        It’s always a *moral* issue. Morality is not necessarily feminine.

        Like

      • icareviews
        November 12, 2015

        True, but what we need is the proper balance and synthesis of the two traits.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 12, 2015

        Sure, as far as style goes, people love Donald Trump precisely because he’s an aggressive “alpha male” type.

        But Donald Trump does nothing but signal “morality.”

        When Trump talks about illegal aliens, he doesn’t say, “fuck those wetback they aren’t white.”

        No, he says that these illegal aliens are murderers and rapists. He’s making a moral case for keeping them out.

        Sure, he is doing it in an aggressive and masculine style, but he is not signaling that “might makes right.”

        Of course, Trump is not pro-White and the anti-illegal immigration thing is just GOP pandering. But Trump is a White guy after all and he thinks like a White guy.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        November 13, 2015

        icareviews, let me rephrase this. In the last three versions of this talk, MacDonald discussed the origins of White people, the social/tribal evolutionary selection that influenced their psychology.

        The issue is that Whites tend to make ingroup and outgroup distinctions based on individual qualities. The idea is that in the hunter-gather tribes of the North, as well as the “Indo-European” cultures more Southern and Eastern, selected for “egalitarian individualism.” The only difference between the two situations is that as you add more people to the mix, the group specializes. So the un-ranked egalitarian individualism of small groups and the ranked egalitarian individualism of large groups.

        In the latter, the egalitarianism is in ranks; in theory each major general is “equal” to another major general, but obviously “superior” to the lower ranks and “inferior” to the upper ranks.

        Both include outsiders. If a stray person wandered into a Northern hunter-gather tribe, they could be accepted into the group as a more-or-less equal. As the Empire grows in the “Indo-European” cultures, the conquered people are included, perhaps at a lower rank, but included nevertheless. You even develop a sort of “caste” system.

        As eyeslevel said, at the end of the day it doesn’t matter if MacDonald is right or wrong about *why* Whites are the way they are, as long as we know *how* Whites are now.

        The theory is that White people make ingroup and outgroup distinctions based on “moral” considerations, not race, tribe, or clan. Of course, they also make implicit, unconscious and conscious ingroup and outgroup distinctions based on race, tribe, and clan, but the psychology and the social pressure push against that. The modern social pressure makes you have to pretend not to notice race, or follow a very tight orthodoxy on race, or else you’re a “racist.”

        So your pro-White pitch has to be a moral pitch, you have to make it moral, not immoral, to be pro-White. You are either pro-White and racist, or anti-White and anti-racist. It’s moral and good to be pro-White, and it’s immoral and bad to be anti-White.

        The pitch doesn’t have to be passive, feminine, or “whites are sometimes victims” or “you can be racist against whites too.” The pitch can also be what Trump is doing implicitly, but to be pro-White you have to be explicit. So a man who bravely defends Whites against the anti-Whites is moral, he’s a hero, he’s a leader. The man who defeats the anti-Whites is a powerful winner. They guy who won’t get shouted down and smeared by some jerk-off social justice warrior isn’t a pushover.

        The customer thinks in terms of right and wrong and he thinks of “his team” as based on moral judgement, not “just race.” That is why “anti-racist” rhetoric works, because it’s a moral pitch, “racism is bad” “don’t judge a man just based on skin color,” etc.

        Now, you can’t make the DailyStormer troll “mistake,” “they will call us Nazis anyway so let’s just be Nazis” then start saying “we Whites can defeat you lesser races, White power! Kill ragheads! Heil Hitler!” Which of course won’t work and is exactly what the anti-Whites want you to do. Plus, that’s just stupid LARPing anyway, it’s just trolling online.

        As for “Faustian” pitches, Whiteys in Space, White Inventions, White Beauty, White dominance in various fields, extreme sports, I’m guessing that the people that like those pitches are already quite receptive and they just need defense against the “racist” slur too.

        Like

      • icareviews
        November 13, 2015

        “As for ‘Faustian’ pitches, Whiteys in Space, White Inventions, White Beauty, White dominance in various fields, extreme sports, I’m guessing that the people that like those pitches are already quite receptive”

        The “Faustian” is a concept and impulse that manifests in any number of ways. Samuel Francis, in his essay on Aryan origins that’s included in the print issue of Radix, discusses this as encompassing wanderlust and even the desire to explore the unknown under the microscope. It doesn’t necessarily have to carry a current of violence, and I wasn’t even thinking of Anglin when I wrote that. I think you know me better than to believe I would ever be tempted to devote blog posts to “Whiteys in Space” or “extreme sports” material. Creativity, yes. Sci-fi speculation or MTV’s Jackass, no. I just happen to think that the “morality” of the message shouldn’t be allowed to degenerate into a mere victimology.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 14, 2015

        @icareviews

        As far as the “Faustian” thing, I listed those because Kevin MacDonald at TOO once posted an article about extreme sports and once about white guys mountain climbing as examples of the “Faustian spirit.”

        Also, over at Alternative Right, there was a debate with two writers over space exploration and whether that was a good example of the “Faustian spirit” or whether it was just yet another fantasy of “white flight.” Hence “Whitey on the Moon.”

        In some ways, you can see honest competition, like sports, as being yet another form of “egalitarian individualism.” A “fair fight” and a “level playing field” where the “best man wins.” In a sense that is also “egalitarian individualism” even thought it is competitive with winners and losers.

        Consider the recent blow-ups in the so-called “movement” (that I don’t wish to drag here) frankly I don’t want to attract the trash from DS and the like. We can see that spammers like “0jr” want to soil the blog with crap about “jew fucking monkeys making afreakians” and the like, and there are always the Usual Suspects wanting to signal their beliefs that “Jews Are Children of the Devil” and other such banalities.

        As far as commenters, Quality > Quantity, and we have plenty of quality here so no need to muddle it up with the dregs.

        Hence my little “entry test” for commenters to prove they actually have something interesting to say.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 13, 2015

        Oh no I’m not suggesting that Anglin is “Faustian.” Anglin is a troll, he’s a wanna-be comedian.

        Honestly, I don’t know too much about the “Faustian” thing. I get that Aryans are conquerors and explorers and scientists. That’s all good. I just mean even that impulse can be appealed to in a moral way.

        I agree completely that we don’t want to just whine that “whites are victims of racism too.” Of course, that’s the standard-issue “liberals are the racists” shtick. We’re perfectly agreed on that.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        November 13, 2015

        I’m no authority on any of these ancient facets of proto-European psychology, either, and I’m deficient in the pre-Christian lore, as well; but all of this has become much more interesting to me since becoming aware of Jewishness as an alien presence within my civilization. There are a ton of books on these subjects that I intend to read, but most of that will have to wait until I’m done with my movie book.

        Like

    • Hipster Racist
      November 12, 2015

      We saw this play out this week at the Missouri university, where a bunch of fake “hate crimes” turned into some “protest” by Blacks that actually got the President fired.

      Sure, trolling in fun, but I noticed on twitter a number of average looking White girls pointing out the hypocrisy of the term “racist.”

      Again, these are just regular, standard issue White college girls. They don’t have a “racist” bone in their body. But when confronted with the “hypocrisy” of Blacks and when they noticed that only Whitey gets called “racist” – they went to the social media to complain.

      Of course, Blacks are tribal. It’s not actually “hypocrisy” on their part. “No Whitey” is just second nature, it’s just their raw instincts.

      But that is not the way Whites are. But when the double-standard of “racism” is noticed, White people pay attention.

      That’s why they invented the term “reverse racism” – and why anti-whites work so hard to attack the concept of “reverse racism.” In fact, the term “white privilege” was basically invented to neutralize the term “reverse racism.”

      Again, notice that this is a *moral* instinct. When white people feel they are being treated unfairly or accused unfairly, they do react to that, and they notice that this “racism” concept is only used against them.

      In fact, they can never even get away from this term “racist” – hell, they might even be a “hipster racist!” They will always be “racist” for having “white privilege” just because they were born White.

      Once people realize that “racist” is a slur used against them by immoral people, they start to understand that it is absolutely 100% moral for White people to work in their own interests.

      Like

      • Alex the Goon
        November 13, 2015

        Hehe, Asian girl nearly lynched at a Safe Space for saying “black people can be racist.” Rucky she wasn’t laped.

        Like

      • oogenhand
        November 13, 2015

        And that is why you should use the bait-and-switch phrase “accused of white privilege” instead of “White” or “Aryan”.

        You do not have to hack your way through the usual obfuscations as “race is a social construct”, “what/who is ‘White’?” etc.etc. It makes immediately clear that Jews and Muslims are not part of our club no matter how blonde, blue-eyed, or even small-nosed and thin-lipped they are (like e.g. Gigi Hadid). Recently converted? No sir, when a few years ago a Dutch convert to Islam was refused entrance to a swimming pool due to het Islamic attire, radical leftists screamed the usual “Racism! Racism! Racism!”. OTOH, it makes clear that the darker ones like Greeks ARE part of our club.

        Finally, it makes clear that you CAN’T simply accuse people of whatever nastiness you like without backing it up. Normally, that is the duty of the attorney general, the judge and the jury (have fun with nullification!).

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 13, 2015

        Oog,

        I like “accused of White privilege.”

        “Those of us accused of White privilege …” “People accused of White privilege.”

        Like

      • eyeslevel
        November 15, 2015

        Anti-whites have NO PROBLEM identifying white people when they talk about slavery, colonialism, privilege, supremacy. But the minute you talk about saving white people from genocide it’s “Duh, what’s a white person? Duh, what’s a white country?”

        You can usually go through their tweets or comments and find ones where they admit to knowing what white is.

        Pointing out this and other internal contradictions of anti-whites over and over is what will bring down the anti-white system.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: You Must Be This Tall To Ride | Hipster Racist

  5. Zobbo
    November 12, 2015

    Thanks Hipster, the video is brilliant.
    Ans so was the short debate between the two of you.

    Like

  6. mindweapon
    November 14, 2015

    I saw this lecture, and sat next to KMac himself!

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      November 14, 2015

      Very cool, MW, I didn’t realize you had attended the conference personally.

      I consider this lecture by KMac one of his most important.

      Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: