Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Liberals Are The Real Racists

A comment at Radix Journal:

The cuckservative reaction to Trump’s immigration plan is indistinguishable from that of Salon or RawStory. The mainstream, religious “right” is and always has been so far behind leftists socially and culturally as far as fads and trends go that they’re just now getting excited about diversity, multiculturalism and gun point equality. They’re like a kid with a new toy with the ideas that were all the rage on the left 30 years ago.

The pathetic thing is that they think the left will finally stop calling them bigots for adopting the stances that they held 30 years ago. Leftists are way over that now, permanent revolution now requires sex change operations for toddlers and the normalization of pedophilia.

The sheer inept stupidity of most “conservatives” leaves me to believe that we’re really barking up the wrong tree for recruitment. Look around on the alt-right. What did you used to be? By and large we were leftists. The white people in that crowd that booed “black lives matter” at Bernie’s attempt to give a speech are probably far more ripe for recruitment than your average Breitbart or NRO reader. We should pursue all whites of course but I think its going to be harder to bring in the conservative evangelicals at this point. Leftists understand that all politics are identity politics while conservatives try to bury their heads in the sand on this issue. I think we’ll have much better success with jaded, cynical leftists who are having a crisis of faith. What happened at Bernie’s speech causes these crises of faith for them. The Occupy Wall Street disintegration due to tumblr identity politics did it for me. Now look at me.

hipster-girls-in-plaid

Advertisements

36 comments on “Liberals Are The Real Racists

  1. Pingback: Liberals Are The Real Racists | Hipster Racist

    • Hipster Racist
      November 1, 2015

      It’s time to stop looking backward and time to start looking forward. Liberal, Stuff White People Like hipsters are retaining their racial identity – thus becoming de-facto Identitarian – while conservative Republicans and Evangelical Christians are taking “anti-racism”” to heart and actually blending themselves out of existence.

      The future doesn’t belong to conservative Republicans.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Adit
        November 2, 2015

        The problem I see is that hipsters and the like are a middle class phenomenon, and the middle class are not noted as revolutionaries. I can’t think of any revolution in history that was started and prosecuted by the middle class (bourgeoisie for all you politic science types.) Typically that class of people keep their head down and when the revolution is 99% done, they come out waving flags for the winning side proclaiming their undying loyalty to the victor. As usually, all the heavy lifting will be done by the working classes.

        That is one of the problems with the “pro-white” (or whatever the nam de jour is) movement as it is today. To date, It’s mostly been just a hobby for a handful of middle class people writing essays to each other. It doesn’t matter if the essays are incisive or not if there is no activism to back it up. That appears to be changing now as the working class is getting the stuffing kicked out of it and can’t ignore things much longer. They’ll be the people clashing with the cops, slinging lead, and doing things to give the elites heartburn. Oh, they also won’t be reading the essays since they’ll be busy actually trying to change things.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        November 2, 2015

        the middle class are not noted as revolutionaries.

        Revolutions are for leftists and anyway, proles don’t do shit.

        The reality is most of the successful revolutionaries have actually been upper or middle class. Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Che, the French Revolutionaries … George Washington – despite what Marx would have you believe, revolutions were always top-down, never bottom-up.

        Also, writing essays *is* “activism.” Essays are propaganda – propaganda is important, so important it’s most of what the intelligence agencies of all nations do.

        When people talk about “taking it to the street” – I cringe. 99% of all “street activism” by pro-Whites is awful, horrible costume-clowning. I can assure you, essays are far more effective than what most White “activists” do, which tends to be dressing up in stupid looking outfits and screaming in public for the local news. That sort of “activism” is counter-productive – the best thing most of those types could do for the pro-White cause is shut up and go home. Every time they get their face on TV, they drive away dozens of Whites who don’t want anything to do with their clown act.

        I’m not saying I have the solution, but “first, do no harm.”

        They’ll be the people clashing with the cops, slinging lead, and doing things to give the elites heartburn.

        This is Marxist fantasy. The “elites” love it – LOVE it – when cops beat down protestors – and the “proles” and the “working class” will cheer on the cops because they think the no-goodnik “protesters” deserve a beating.

        the heavy lifting will be done by the working classes.

        This is White Nationalism 2.0 – we’ve left behind the Rambo posturing and “hot lead and cold steel” fantasies. It won’t work. The cops out gun you and the “working class” you are idealizing actually side with working class cops, NOT “radical street activists.”

        Like

      • Adit
        November 2, 2015

        “The reality is most of the successful revolutionaries have actually been upper or middle class. Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Che, the French Revolutionaries…”

        So you are saying that A. The leader were Middle class, B. The Majority of the Middle class supported them, and C. The revolutionaries themselves were majority Middle class. That is what I mean when I talk about a revolution being prosecuted by the Middle class. Do those revolutions fit those criteria or is it more like someone from the Middle/Upper class led while the rank and file were majority proles? Marx called the lower middle class the ‘internal enemy,’ so I doubt communist revolutions were majority middle class. Ive been searching for a demographic breakdown for these revolutions, but haven’t been able to find anything helpful yet. This is all semantics anyhow since I looked at the population required for a successful revolt (see farther below.)

        “When people talk about “taking it to the street” – I cringe. 99% of all “street activism” by pro-Whites is awful, horrible costume-clowning.”

        What makes you even assume they’ll be Pro-Whites? I sure don’t. More than likely it’ll be John Q Public pushed into a corner so hard, he is left with no other choice. Think Robert Stack types. (for those who don’t remember he suicided a plane into the IRS a few years back.) He wasn’t WN, but the system tormented him so hard he snapped and went off the rails. We could see more of this. Even small rebel groups forming with no other goal than to stick it the system hard before they’re killed. Any of you guys even consider this and what it could do to the political dynamics?

        “This is White Nationalism 2.0 – we’ve left behind the Rambo posturing and “hot lead and cold steel” fantasies. It won’t work. The cops out gun you and the “working class” you are idealizing actually side with working class cops, NOT “radical street activists.””

        The problem here is that you are not calling the shots for the majority of White people and have little or no influence over them. Some other group might decide it could work and give it a try. That in and of itself could change everything. Let’s be honest, what do you think the % of White Population are WN types? (if you cast the widest net) 1 or 2% of the White Population? I think thats overly generous myself but lets go with that. Since Whites make up only around 60% (last number I heard) of the US population you will need to convince at least 15% more percent of the White population to join you. (A minimum of 10% of the general population is a rough historical estimate to allow a revolt to be successful.) That leaves 83-4% of the White population in the wind, doing God knows what stupidity. Every year, the % of White population needed to allow a successful rebellion will go up due to non-white demographic growth, until it becomes numerically improbable. Looking at that, I’m wondering if WN2.0 has enough time to work. This stuff should have been done in the 60s, not now, but here we are.

        What you or I think may not make much difference. People will follow the first movement to show any real success. Everyone will fall in line, like ducks in a row. That’s how it has always worked and I see no reason for it to be different this time. The moral here is, you better be successful or learn to like towing someone else’s line.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 2, 2015

        What I’m saying is that revolutions do not spring from “the workers” or “the proles.” Historically, revolutions have been top-down, not bottom up.

        The idea of the “proles rising up against their oppressors” is just Communist propaganda, it has never worked that way in real life.

        OK, Robert Stack flew a plane into the IRS. Now he’s dead, the IRS building is repaired, and … now what? That sort of thing happens all the time and it’s completely useless. It certainly doesn’t threaten the IRS or the federal government in general.

        needed to allow a successful rebellion

        You are stuck in this idea that there’s going to be a physical war, with guns and riots and the like. That is not going to happen.

        Instead of a “revolution” – think “evolution.” There is not going to be a Final Battle where the White Hats defeat the Black hats and then we all live happily ever after. Life is a constant struggle and the “war” never ends.

        100 years from now, White people will still exist. All we are doing is negotiating the conditions.

        Like

  2. icareviews
    November 1, 2015

    “What did you used to be? By and large we were leftists.”

    I was never what I would describe as a “leftist”, but was never really a “conservative” in the sense that Republicans are, either. As an adolescent I was more of a nihilist who just happened to hate liberals. I was always something of a race realist and sympathized with fascism in high school, but was demoralized by all of the mythology surrounding that era and the rest of our history, which I of course believed at the time.

    I lost interest in politics, got more interested in film, and mostly tried to block the outside world out of my mind until the 2008 stock market crash forced itself on my consciousness. It was around that time that I gave up reading fiction and started trying to educate myself in more history and figure out what was wrong with the world. I was still a Ron Paul guy in 2012, a racist but not really focused on race. I still wanted to believe that some ideological system could save the white race without being rude enough to acknowledge as much; but I radicalized fairly rapidly over the course of 2013 and started focusing on Jews and frequenting more of the white nationalist material online. I’m sorry to say I was late coming to the table on a lot of this stuff; but the truth is that I had ceased to be a libertarian well before I even understood this myself. Libertarian Realist’s videos were valuable to me during this transitional phase.

    I suppose my never having been religious smoothed the way and made it easier for me to eschew mainstream conservative solutions. I think a lot of libertarians are potential white nationalists, probably more so than the liberals. One of the biggest gripes against the state, after all, is the disproportionately dysgenic welfare system. The “liberty movement”, embarrassed though many would be to admit, is for many of its followers (though not for its theorists) largely a secret and misguided effort to secure a future for whites. Murray Rothbard understood the uneasy connection between anti-state attitudes and identitarianism, which accounts for the “redneck strategy” of the 80s. This wasn’t exactly successful; but what if it could be reverse-engineered to better effect?

    Like

  3. icareviews
    November 1, 2015

    Reblogged this on icareviews and commented:

    Cuckservatives frequently cry that Democrats are the real racists. Are they correct? Are leftists more promising recruits for white nationalism than conservatives?

    Like

    • Reallynewguy
      November 1, 2015

      I think there are a lot more barriers to cross with leftists. First off, conservatives don’t have white guilt like liberals do. Instead of blaming all whites, conservatives black the welfare state and liberals for black dysfunction and bad cities. Secondly, white nationalists are often social conservative, which is a much bigger bridge to cross for leftists. Third, conservatives are much more tolerant of inequality, viewing it as natural and something to base their life around rather than resist. Liberals are often less family oriented,and hedonistic, which is not something nationalists are tolerant of. Conservatives could tolerate racial inequality, like sexual inequality, but a racialist liberal is someone living in a contradiction. Liberals are anti-white, and are against particularism. Conservatives, they are fanatically pro-Israel and pro-Jewish, which is a problem. But even with that, leftists are not anti-jew either and think of Jews as the prototype oppressed people.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        November 1, 2015

        conservatives don’t have white guilt like liberals do.

        But that is the problem, they do. Cultural conservatives like the Southern Baptist convention, and Evangelicals in general, have completely embraced White Guilt. Even the conservatives that reject White Guilt are doing so only to push more racial harmony and “anti-racism.”

        Meanwhile, the urban hipsters, SWPL-types are busy gentrifying formerly non-White neighborhoods and building a culture that is all but exclusively White.

        white nationalists are often social conservative, which is a much bigger bridge to cross for leftists.

        If social conservatism is preventing White liberals from becoming pro-White, maybe it’s time to rethink social conservatism.

        Social conservatism these days means religious Christian saying Planned Parenthood is “racist” because of Margaret Sander. Maybe it’s the social conservatives that are the problem.

        But even with that, leftists are not anti-jew either and think of Jews as the prototype oppressed people.

        The left has embraced the Palestinian cause. I think the “right” and the “left” are not the same as they were 20 years ago. The old categories no longer apply.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Reallynewguy
        November 1, 2015

        Hipster Racist,
        | But that is the problem, they do. Cultural conservatives like the Southern Baptist convention, and Evangelicals in general, have completely embraced White Guilt. Even the conservatives that reject White Guilt are doing so only to push more racial harmony and “anti-racism.”|

        Conservatives don’t buy into white privilege, whiteness, America was built on genocide etc. A lot smaller bridge to cross.

        |Social conservatism these days means religious Christian saying Planned Parenthood is “racist” because of Margaret Sander. Maybe it’s the social conservatives that are the problem.|
        That’s because they’re trying to appeal to blacks.
        |The left has embraced the Palestinian cause. I think the “right” and the “left” are not the same as they were 20 years ago. The old categories no longer apply.|

        Leftist are a lot more anti-white then conservatives. They set trends in anti-whiteness, and conservatives imitate. Conservaties are an easier convert. They hate socialism, Hollywood, white privilege BS, multiculturalism, AA, closer to our position than the left. They are fanatically Pro-Israel like Evangicals.

        Like

      • icareviews
        November 1, 2015

        I have a Christian Zionist Republican coworker who’s a true believer in the cuckservative cause. He goes out of his way to say nice things about blacks and even married and procreated outside of his race, with a Mexican woman. This guy and his kind are too soul-damaged to ever be white nationalists.

        As for what Hipster Racist is saying about liberals, I think your differences might be a matter of how you’re defining “liberal”. I don’t think he’s necessarily talking about the hardcore SJWs, but just average young whites who watch The Daily Show and stuff like that and haven’t been initiated into serious engagement with political issues. These are millennials who might describe themselves as “liberal” and enjoy leftist entertainment products, but are naturally attracted to their own race, enjoy distinctively white music and aesthetics, and segregate in implicit rather than explicit ways.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Reallynewguy
        November 1, 2015

        Hardcore SJWs are the very last ppl we want to try to attract. Liberals as well are hard to attract. I think The Zio-cuck right would actually be easier. Liberals are only Anti-Zionist, not anti-Hollywood like cons are. Conservatives complain about Hollywood polluting our culture, but don’t connect with Jews, just like Alinsky and Marxists.

        Like

      • icareviews
        November 1, 2015

        I think Christian Zionists are just going to have to be outlived. Their children, on the other hand, are more promising. They’ll have strong family backgrounds and hopefully a desire to perpetuate that; but exposure to the utter failure of their forebears’ political program, coupled with the natural adolescent tendency to rebel, will hopefully open their eyes to their parents’ idiocy. Also, whites are becoming less and less religious with each generation, and the immediate problem of encroaching minority status will be much more real and important to them than fairy tale attachments to Middle Eastern real estate.

        Like

      • Reallynewguy
        November 1, 2015

        I think you have a really good point on that. The kids of Zio-Cucks will probably go through a rebellious stage and convert to race realism or at least Jew-awareness. I can’t see less religiosity as a plus, in fact atheists are often cultural marxists, so religious must be doing something right.

        Like

      • icareviews
        November 1, 2015

        I don’t necessarily think a person has to have religion (I don’t), but somebody definitely needs to have a sense of something higher and more important than himself. Whites started to lose that when they lost Christian belief; loss of Christian belief itself isn’t the problem with us, really; it’s that so many of us just don’t believe in anything at all but instantaneous gratification.

        Like

      • Reallynewguy
        November 1, 2015

        I think loss of religious believe often leaves a void, and atheists fill it with leftism usually. That’s why I’m saying converting conservatives to atheism would also probably mean a leftward shift.

        Like

      • Reallynewguy
        November 1, 2015

        I am an agnostic personally, so I sound like a hypocrite. But my point still stands.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 1, 2015

        I can’t see less religiosity as a plus, in fact atheists are often cultural marxists, so religious must be doing something right.

        Conservative Evangelicals are some of the most pro-miscegenation and pro-multiracial people around. They are doing everything wrong, except that they tend to have more children.

        The upper middle class tend to be “socially liberal” yet fanatically exclusively white in their personal lives. Conservatives race-mix more and Christians hold up race-mixing as almost an ideal. Liberal upper-middle class types might say they are “against racism” but in actually reality they are the opposite.

        Religion is pretty much dead and it’s not coming back. The only place where Christianity is growing is among non-Whites. Christianity is already a majority non-White religion and that likely won’t change.

        Like

      • Reallynewguy
        November 1, 2015

        Liberals are the ones that are advocating massive third-world immigration, refugees and multiculturalism. The fact they put the welfare of their children first shouldn’t surprise you. The fact that conservative are pro-racemixing is because of the propaganda, they are slightly less ok with it.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 1, 2015

        Liberals are the ones that are advocating massive third-world immigration, refugees and multiculturalism.

        That would be Jeb Bush, the conservative Republican.

        My entire point is that “liberal” and “conservative” are essentially meaningless. The “conservative” Chamber of Commerce is the main driving force behind massive immigration – NOT ideological liberals or leftists. It was “conservative Republican” Ronald Reagan that gave us the first massive amnesty. Regular white people who happen to be “liberal” do not support immigration any more than regular white people who happen to be “conservative.”

        The fact that conservative are pro-racemixing is because of the propaganda, they are slightly less ok with it.

        But the numbers show that they actually do it *more* than liberals do.

        For leftists, identity politics is everything. Conservatives and the Republicans are the “color blind party” who says “race doesn’t matter.” They simply are not any more pro-white than liberals, in some cases, a lot of cases, they are worse.

        Like

      • Reallynewguy
        November 1, 2015

        As you can see, Jeb is not well liked. Conservatives find his poistions pretty distasteful.The chamber of commerce is the ones supporting Jeb!who are anti-Tea party, anti-conservative.
        Ever think the reason they do it more is that they actually live among diversity, unlike hypocritical libs?

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 1, 2015

        Ever think the reason they do it more is that they actually live among diversity, unlike hypocritical libs?

        Quite likely. So, in our case, “hypocritical libs” are the ones actually saving the White race and “living white” while only paying lip service to the anti-White system.

        Conservatives actually believe it. That’s the point.

        Conservatives are just as fanatically “anti-racist” as the most politically correct liberal. In fact, the title of the article “Liberals are the real racists” – is exactly what conservatives say all the time.

        The GOP is the “party of Lincoln” and Democrats are the “real racists.”

        Liked by 1 person

      • Reallynewguy
        November 1, 2015

        They aren’t saving the white race because they actually care about it.They care about their kids, not whites in general. Libs are still fanatically anti-white.

        Like

    • Byzantium Bosporous
      November 1, 2015

      I believe you are correct in your assumption that “leftists” and others besides cuckservatives could be converted to White nationalism or at least racial realist.

      Myself from as far back as I can remember I was always a homosexual, but I was always a racial realist because I grew up in a 100% White village. So I know what it is like to have a peaceful and a socially cohesive society with ZERO crime and ZERO riots……

      Like yourself, I realized I was a White nationalist just in the last year. Late to the game as well, so to speak. Politics never was part of my life and also never questioned my “degenerate” lifestyle.

      Anyways, “isms” are used as a weapon against our race. They want us to have less children and disappear.

      I thought it was just me, but I found race mixing a very disgusting thing. Of course now science has proven us right with the discovery of new “black” ancestor ape species…….. About time. The blacks are a different species and we now have genetic proof.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        November 1, 2015

        You should check out James J. O’Meara on Counter-Currents.com, the ultimate Racist Gay Guy. He’s a very funny writer too.

        I’m completely against any “isms” and ideology in general. Nothing is more boring than listening to people arguing over Paleoconservatism vs. Libertarianism vs. whatever-ism.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      November 1, 2015

      Richard Spencer has the idea that as Millennials are stuck with multi-racialism and diversity, this might have the effect of turning them Identitarian. You already see a “reactionary movement” against “Social Justice Warriorism” among the young. The left, the diversocrats and the like have now become the fuddy-duddy Puritan fun-killers still stick in the 1960s. To the Millennials, Martin Luther King Jr. is just another irrelevant historical figure that no one cares about and Civil Rights Marches in Selma are just another boring documentary on the Hitler Channel. In fact, I’ve even heard first hand reports of German kids rolling their eyes at yet more lessons about “evil Hitler and the Nazis.”

      Regardless of what the Tard Corral that is the White Nationalist movement likes to fantasize about, these Millennials are not going to be joining obscure Christian sects, nor are they going to run off to Montana and form militias to prepare for guerrilla war against the Feds as Harold Covington wants you to send him money for.

      I’m not even sure it’s worth bothering with the “Alt-Right” – what does it mean to be “right wing” anyway? Mostly that seems to be arguing online about how you’re against “egalitarianism” – yet more ideological posturing.

      You know how hipster bands have two names, the name of the band itself and the name of the type of music they play? So, the band “Slowdive” plays “Shoegaze” music.

      It’s the same with the “Alt-Right” from I can tell. You have your blog name, usually a reference to a Japanese children’s cartoon, and the name of your ideology, “Monarcho-Papist” or “Techno-Libertarianism” or whatever. It’s all just so much mental masturbation.

      In fact, I’m not even going to call myself a “White Nationalist” anymore, as nationalism is basically an 18th century ideology. I’m going to embrace the term “Identitarianism.” I’m White, that is my Identity. That’s all I need. That’s all any of us need. It’s a pure expression of the 14 Words, and we can have a very big tent.

      I’d bet the farm that ten hipster Millennials with an explicit White Identity are worth more than a hundred costume clowns pretending to be “Throne and Altar Monarchist Traditionalists” ready to “take it to the streets” or other such idiocy.

      The European Identitarians seem to have this pretty well figured out; now, it’s time for the Americans to catch up. What is blocking us is all the idiotic baggage of a 50 year old “movement” largely consisting of psychopaths, cranks, and frauds.

      My attitude toward the baggage of the “White Nationalist movement” of the last 50 years?

      “Who are you carrying around all those bricks for, anyway? Just set it down.”

      Liked by 2 people

      • icareviews
        November 1, 2015

        I’m fine with the label “white nationalist” as long as “nation” is understood as race as opposed to what Yockey termed the “petty-statism” of warring governments. “Identitarian” is a very useful word, however, in that it lacks the negative connotations that “nationalism” has for most people brought up in the western indoctrination complex. I use both terms interchangeably, partly so as to avoid repetitious prose by repeating one over and over again.

        Liked by 1 person

  4. icareviews
    November 1, 2015

    Then there’s always this approach:

    Liked by 2 people

  5. indravaruna
    November 1, 2015

    “The mainstream, religious “right” is and always has been so far behind leftists socially and culturally as far as fads and trends go that they’re just now getting excited about diversity, multiculturalism and gun point equality.”

    This is something Richard Spencer has been saying, apparently there is a Christian Hollywood and they made the same movie that Liberal jews in Hollywood made 15 years before, “Woodlawn” about Football and school integration in the South, its the same story of ‘Remember The Titans’.

    Evangelicals are the ideal foot soldiers for the Jewish-American NWO, they will convert the Coloreds of the world to their Pharisee whorshipping faith, I looked into a neocon think tank website, The American Interest, one of the news was that the Evangelicals “will conquer the world” and this is good for American (jewish) interests.

    Liked by 3 people

  6. BMan
    November 1, 2015

    He lost me when repeatedly insinuating that a person recognizing “state’s right’s” is a “racist”. (Not to mention the glaring historical inaccuracies and rabbit holes he laid out there)
    I am not convinced by his presentation.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      November 1, 2015

      @BMan

      I just picked that video because it’s such a great example of the kind of thing the “cuckservatives” fawn over. It’s all so completely insincere, but conservatives wet themselves when a White-presenting Black guy tells them that they are good and moral and it’s the liberals who are the “real racists.” (See, Ben Carson or Herman Cain.)

      It doesn’t need to be accurate or even to make sense.

      That’s the problem with dumb partisanship, it’s all FOX vs. MSNBC, not different that cheering for your favorite sports team.

      Like

  7. eyeslevel
    November 1, 2015

    What’s important is are you pro-white or anti-white.

    Cuckservatives are just as “anti-racist” i.e. anti-white as leftists. They demand white countries open their borders to millions of racial aliens. They demand those racial aliens be assimilated with the white population just like leftists do. If they were truly anti-racist in the common sense view they would demand non-white countries open their borders, too. But they never do.

    The cuckservative says “Israel for Jews, white countries for everybody!” So they are not color-blind as they pretend to be. If you are very careful to be color-blind ONLY in white areas, you are not really color-blind, are you? As if being blind to anything was ever a good thing.

    Cuckservatives may pretend to be slightly more color-blind than leftists, but since they are equally anti-white, what difference does it make? Screaming “you’re the real racists!” doesn’t accomplish anything.

    DEMAND that everyone who claims to be a conservative declare whether they are pro-white or anti-white, not how racist they are.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Pingback: 2014 Going On 1984 | Aryan Skynet

  9. Pingback: Donald Trump The Hipster Racist | Aryan Skynet

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: