Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

The Donald Deception

He sucks.

He sucks.

A favorite meme of opposition Twitterites these days is the #cuckservative classification for limp-dick lamestream “conservative” stalwarts like Lindsey Graham, Glenn Beck, Jeb Bush, and John Boehner. So eager are many on the race-realist Right to see the Overton window expanded to include such characterizations that several have chosen to embrace sideshow attraction presidential “candidate” Donald Trump as the natural foil and antidote to the complacency of the fancy lads in the Republican establishment. Trump has won a devoted following by daring to be marginally honest and comparatively impolite in addressing the ongoing demographic dispossession of the American citizenry.

“Trump is the man!” trumpets End Cultural Marxism account @genophilia. “I have endorsed Donald Trump for the Presidency of these United States,” proclaims The Daily Stormer’s Andrew Anglin, who even dubs his contender the “Great White Hope”. Trolls on Twitter are clearly elated and see Trump as one of their own – a  trash-talking shitlord. “The Donald Doxxes Lindsey Graham in Front of a Live Audience,” hoots the Stormer, framing Trump’s publicity coup as an act of hilarious real-world trollery. He “DID IT FOR THE LULZ,” concurs fellow white nationalist Andrew “Weev” Auernheimer.

“We Are All Donald Trump Now,” says James Kirkpatrick, offering his support at VDare. Notwithstanding their noted aversion to “demotism”, a number of tweeters who tag their opinions with #NRx are also expressing interest in the Donald. It seems worth asking in this situation if anything else distinguishes Trump from his cuckservative opponents. Does he represent a return to populism and realism, or have disgruntled rightists merely been duped into lending support to controlled cuckservative opposition?

Writing at Occam’s Razor, Alfred W. Clark establishes a useful definition of the cuckservative type.

Very basically, the cuckservative is a white gentile conservative (or libertarian) who thinks he’s promoting his own interests but really isn’t.  In fact, the cuckservative is an extreme universalist and seems often to suffer from ethnomasochism & pathological altruism. In short, a cuckservative is a white (non-Jewish) conservative who isn’t racially aware.

In some ways, the cuckservative is the counterpart of the SJW (social justice warrior), and they are more alike than dissimilar. You often will hear the cuckservative screaming at an SJW about how “the Democrats are the real racists.”

The cuckservative feels very passionate about issues like abortion, which rarely directly affects his own life.  In fact, you might often hear a cuckservative talking about how abortion is “racist” since blacks and mestizos overwhelmingly get more abortions that whites.

On the other hand, the cuckservative feels uncomfortable about issues like immigration.  If the cuckservative is not an outright open-borders shill, he will only give lip service about “securing the border” or “opposing illegal but favoring legal immigration” but he will never talk about immigration very much.  After all, immigration has very serious implications for Western Civilization, so it doesn’t concern the cuckservative.

Cuckservatism personified: Ziocuck Prom royalty Lindsey Graham and John McCain.

Cuckservatism personified: Ziocuck Prom royalty Lindsey Graham and John McCain.

The cuckservative is often fanatically in favor of transracial adoption.  He sees it as some divine calling.  In a sense, this is cuckoldry at its essence, since these whites are usually forgoing their own inclusive fitness to adopt someone from another race.  As Heartiste notes, they’re race-cucking their own families.

Although the cuckservative is eager to show his PC bona fides by openness to other races, he really doesn’t want to know about other races.  Human biodiversity terrifies the cuckservative, as deep down he has bought into blank-slatism and egalitarianism.  The cuckservative would rather just have a Herman Cain or Clarence Thomas poster on his wall than actually have to honestly think about race.

The cuckservative, although never Jewish, often seems vicariously to live through Israel.  Since the cuckservative feels that he cannot defend his own ethnic interests, he’ll defend Israel’s.  The cuckservative cares more about Israel’s borders than his own.  Israel adamantly defends its own ethnic interests and perhaps deep down the cuckservative respects this on some unconscious level.

On the other hand, the idea of whites acting as a group to secure their own interests terrifies the cuckservative. If you ever want to troll a cuckservative, just repeatedly use the word “white,” such as “this isn’t beneficial for the white community.”  The cuckservative will be triggered immediately.

Keeping this definition in mind, does Trump exhibit any behaviors that might be deemed cuckservative in any way? A number of photo ops suggest that if Trump is truly the great race-realist supporters want him to be, he has frequently been at pains to advance an altogether different image for public consumption. “Nelson Mandela and myself had a wonderful relationship,” Trump says of the celebrated South African terrorist, adding that Mandela “was a special man and will be missed.”

“Sometimes an asset swap is the way to go.”

“Necklacing, eh? Maybe you should talk to Ivanka about getting some of your stuff into her ‘Rock Tradition’ line.”

“Take it from a guy who knows casinos. Always bet on black.”

Who, too, can forget the contemptible foible that seems to have been memory-holed in the desperate rush to embrace anybody but Bush, Graham, Christie, Paul, Rubio, or Walker, when Trump shamelessly stated that Oprah Winfrey would make a “great” running mate for him? Nor was this the first time Trump has suggested such a pairing. Exploring his options for the 2000 race, Trump informed Larry King that Winfrey would be his first choice for running mate. “I mean, she’s popular, she’s brilliant, she’s a wonderful woman.” Clearly, Trump is not averse to playing the sad and degrading “Some of my best friends are . . .” game – the true sport of cuckservative champions.

A. Nolen, in the essential essay “What Is Donald Trump?”, makes the following observations about Trump’s pseudo-populist politics:

There is nothing about Trump’s past, nor the way he made his fortune, that suggests he is “conservative” or sensitive to the struggles of most Americans. Despite this, Trump is being championed/vilified through both “conservative” and “liberal” media outlets – and especially through Twitter – as some sort of champion of the silent, “conservative” majority.

Back before Trump’s fall out with Univision [and] NBC he was a business partner to both. [. . .]

Trump’s tacky Miss USA pageant promotes Washington D.C. values, not American ones. Remember the “Miss California Controversy” in 2009? Trump’s show chose celebrity blogger Perez Hilton, real name Mario Armando Lavandeira Jr., as a judge for that year’s pageant. Mr. “Hilton” had a gay marriage agenda and asked the Californian contestant Carrie Prejean her “thoughts on legalizing gay marriage”. Her answer cost her the title and drew “thinly veiled disgust” from ‘Hilton’, who later called her “a dumb bitch”.

Trump waxed wishy-washy on gay marriage as quoted in this article at Today “News”:

Donald Trump [like Barack Obama] described himself as “evolving” on the issue of LGBT rights Saturday in an interview in Russia with openly gay MSNBC anchor Thomas Roberts. [. . .]

Trump said the issue is one that’s rapidly evolving.

“I think really what you have is a very changing stance, and you see if changing very rapidly. If you go back ten years ago it’s very different,” Trump said.

When asked about his own evolution, Trump echoed a sentiment he’s said in the past, saying, “I think I’m evolving, and I think I’m a very fair person, but I have been for traditional marriage…I am for traditional marriage, I am for a marriage between a man and a woman.”

“As everyone is aware, Trump has a Jewish son-in-law,” acknowledges Anglin. “Many people are bringing this up, but I’m not clear on what it is supposed to mean when brought up. Does it mean that he is controlled by Jews?” he asks. “I don’t really see that it means that, and it strikes me as a bit tinfoilish, along the lines of ‘if you see it on TV it means Jews want you to see it’ type of conspiracy extremism. I haven’t seen any real commentary on what exactly the thinking is here, so I can’t really comment further.” “Jews hate Trump because he’s a WASP who beat them at their own NYC real-estate game,” declares Lord Humungus in solidarity with this Trump-the-racialist wishful-thinking narrative.

“The only kind of people I want counting my money are little short guys that wear yarmulkes every day,” Ziocuck Trump once reportedly said. What about Trump’s business dealings? Can anything of his political origin story be inferred from these? Nolen offers a few intriguing speculations:

If Trump’s previous politics weren’t enough to blow the cover on this latest deception, consider that he is a New York real estate developer. NYC’s real estate business is incredibly corrupt– even the smallest construction projects need “fixers”, i.e. professional consultants who know who to pay off in local government to prevent harassment and ‘shake-downs’ of developers. You don’t get rich in that business without playing fast and loose with the law– just like the illegal immigrants Trump criticizes.

Trump’s business has gone bankrupt no less than four times, each time involving his gambling operations in Atlantic City, The Tackiest Place on Earth. When ordinary people like you or I go bankrupt, it makes getting subsequent loans– especially loans for the same type of project– more difficult. But Donald Trump isn’t hampered by market forces. Trump has the connections and the credit lines to insulate himself, which suggests he’s simply the promotional face of *someone else’s money*. Perhaps that’s why he’s so sensitive to criticisms of “his fortune”.

Whose money might Trump front for? Trump’s financial success is based around NYC and its surrounding environs… remember too big to fail? Trump’s backing probably comes from the same financial interests which pay to promote social change agendas in the USA and abroad, and which benefit so much from illegal immigration and the resultant social dysfunction.

“What? Me worry?”

The late Michael Collins Piper, writing in American Free Press in 2011, revealed the following information about the history of Trump’s fortune-amassing gambling enterprises:

Donald Trump’s rise to stardom came as a consequence of his having been a flamboyant front man for some unsavory behind-the-scenes sponsors. Here’s the story:

In his memoir, Trump proudly described how in 1987 he bought his first casino interests when he purchased 93 percent of the voting stock in the Resorts International (RI) gambling concern.

What Trump didn’t say was that RI was controlled by a clique of sordid, international big-money elements in alliance with the Jewish crime syndicate which was, in turn, collaborating with the CIA and Israel’s Mossad in an array of inter-connected money-laundering operations.

The casinos laundered money for the CIA and the Mossad. In return, these agencies used their influence to ensure the mob remained protected from interference by law enforcement.

To understand where Trump fits in, we turn to RI’s murky origins. RI evolved from a CIA front—the Mary Carter Paint Company—set up in the 1950s by then-CIA director Allen Dulles and his close associate, New York Gov. Thomas E. Dewey, a leader of the “Rockefeller wing” of the GOP. While the company did in fact operate a national paint store chain, its real purpose was to function as a covert CIA money-laundering operation.

In 1958 and 1959 Dewey and several associates used CIA funds to buy a controlling interest in the Crosby-Miller Corporation (headed by Dewey friend James Crosby), which was then merged with Mary Carter. The new concern laundered CIA money for the arming of the anti-Castro Cuban exiles and also launched lucrative gambling enterprises in the Caribbean where the CIA was active, having engaged the Meyer Lansky crime syndicate in plots to topple Fidel Castro.

How many law-abiding Americans who bought Mary Carter’s paint would have thought they were funding a joint CIA-mob operation posing behind the smiling face of a “typical American housewife,” the fictional “Mary Carter” whose visage adorned its products?

In 1963 the company spun off its paint division and began focusing on its casino operations, particularly in the Bahamas. In 1967 and 1968 Mary Carter changed its name to Resorts International and expanded. Several principal investors provided the assets:

• Meyer Lansky, the “chairman of the board” of the Jewish crime syndicate;

• David Rockefeller, who provided his family’s clout with the CIA and in global banking to assist;

• The Investors Overseas Service, then the world’s largest “flight-capital” conglomerate, headed by notorious Bernard Cornfeld who was no more than a frontman for two behind-the-scenes principals:

• Tibor Rosenbaum, the Mossad’s Swiss-based arms procurer, who headed the Banque De Credit Internationale of Geneva, the Lansky syndicate’s chief European money launderer;

• Baron Edmond de Rothschild of the infamous banking family and a personal business partner of Rosenbaum in many Mossad-related ventures; and

• William Mellon Hitchcock, an heir to the Mellon dynasty—one of America’s largest family fortunes which has collaborated closely with the CIA for years. In 1970 the mob moved to expand legalized gambling on U.S. soil. Mob chief Lansky called a high-level syndicate conference where the fading resort of Atlantic City was pinpointed as their new target. Prior to this, Lansky-controlled Nevada was the only outpost of legal gambling in the United States. RI’s resources were used to finance the lobbying campaign that brought legalized gambling to Atlantic City and RI quickly moved in.

In 1987 upon the death of RI’s nominal head—CIA frontman James Crosby—up-and-coming New York real estate tycoon Trump stepped in and bought Crosby’s RI holdings. So while the name “Trump” appeared in the headlines, RI’s real movers remained hidden from public view.

Trump shed his RI investments in his much-publicized “bankruptcy” but he remains a major player in the gambling industry—and now he may be running for president of the United States.

Perhaps, some readers may be thinking, Trump has at one time or another in his career entertained some shady associations; but what is the evidence that Trump the shitlord of 2015, the truth-teller on immigration and troller of Lindsey Graham and John McCain, is a Zio-catamite the same as those he ridicules? One need look no further than the man’s own comments as to his policy leanings where the Middle East is concerned.

This item dredged by The Ugly Truth may also be of interest:

In the middle of a phone interview with on June 26, billionaire real estate mogul and Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump leaves his desk to scan the wall of his office for awards he has received from the Jewish community.

Trump reads the text of some relevant plaques before returning to his desk. But before this reporter can move on to the next question, Trump eagerly points out that he was the grand marshal of New York City’s annual Salute to Israel Parade (now the Celebrate Israel Parade) in 2004 “at a time when it was quite dangerous to do that” and “a pretty tough time for Israel,” in the middle of the second Palestinian intifada (uprising against Israel). He also cites a video endorsement he gave Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for the Jewish state’s January 2013 election, expressing pride that it was “at the time the only ad done by a celebrity” for Netanyahu.

What does all of this have to do with the 2016 American presidential election? President Barack Obama won 78 percent of Jewish votes when he was first elected in 2008, and despite a rocky relationship with Israel when compared to most other U.S. presidents, he garnered 69 percent of the Jewish vote in 2012. Trump, however, touts his close relationship with Israel and the Jewish community as the reason he believes he can outperform Republican contenders of both the past and present among Jewish voters.

How close, in fact, is Trump’s relationship with Judaism? Unlike the name of his reality TV show, he is no apprentice when it comes to the Jewish faith. Trump’s daughter Ivanka converted to Judaism in 2009, and her observance of Shabbat with her husband Jared Kushner (a well-known real estate developer as well as the owner and publisher of the New York Observer newspaper) is well-documented.

“I have great respect for [the Shabbat traditions], and I see Ivanka during Saturday, and from Friday evening on through Saturday night, she won’t take phone calls and they live a very interesting life,” Trump said. “And it’s actually a beautiful thing to watch, with Jared and Ivanka. In a very hectic life, it really becomes a very peaceful time. So there’s something very nice about it.”

There are already 14 declared Republican presidential candidates, and many of them are publicly expressing support for Israel, but Trump argues—in his typically brash and blunt fashion—that his history with the Jewish people and the Jewish state can set him apart from the rest of the crowded GOP field.

“I think that even a casual observer will recognize that Donald Trump screams ‘managed opposition’,” continues Nolen. “So why is he being trotted out to oppose a policy which is central to the USA’s oligarchical power structure?”

Trump’s political career is not about appealing to the masses, it’s about threatening a subset of American elites who back negotiating with Iran rather than crushing Iran under a jackboot. The jackboot contingent is threatening the negotiating contingent with unleashing popular discontent to push through their war agenda.

Unfortunately, the USA signed the world up for a nuclear Middle East when we decided to ignore Israel’s stockpile of nuclear weapons. Once that became our policy, it was imperative for Israel’s neighbors to arm themselves in a similar fashion if they could possibly find a way. Obama’s strategy of negotiating – i.e. influencing how Iran chooses to protect itself – is a more enlightened strategy, but there’s nothing about being an American oligarch which predisposes someone to enlightenment.

There are a significant number of American power-brokers who share the blind Realitatsflucht of those mid-century politicians who doomed the “Jewish State” by poo-pooing St. John Philby’s plan for Israel which respected native Arabs’ rights. These hawks probably don’t like the reception which Bibi recently received from the Obama administration; they probably feel time is not on their side. Hence, The Hair in 2016.

This hawkish anti-Iran faction is threatening to “rock the boat” by unleashing popular unrest unless their peers follow suit and support the “jackboot” method of dealing with Iran’s nuclear ambitions. However, “the threat of Trump” is not a credible threat for the hawks to make. Neither the hawks nor the negotiators can afford to let popular anti-illegal immigration sentiment off its leash, which is why a narcissistic NYC property mogul/casino operator is spearheading criticism of law-breaking. When it’s time to shut Donald up, gory details from his unsavory past will be suddenly discovered by Gawker, etc. The hopes of millions of law-abiding American citizens will be consumed in Trump’s fireball of corruption and demoralization.

“Do you think Trump is any more of a clown than any other ‘legit’ candidate?” asks Chateau Heartiste. “The ship of state is steered by an army of malevolent clowns. May as well shake it up and enjoy the spectacle of the ruling globo-equalist class sweating bullets.” Terminal unseriousness notwithstanding, there is an undeniable entertainment value to the Trump candidacy, and his campaign should continue to be monitored with interest; but to expect anything more than “lulz” from some self-aggrandizing Shabbos goy money-grubber who spouts Israeli propaganda with a straight face would be a bigger joke than Donald Trump’s notorious hair itself. Trump has cited theatrical impresario Flo Ziegfeld as one of his most important role models when he was growing up – an admission which pretty well sums up the whole Donald Trump phenomenon for what it really is – gaudy political theater of the showgirls-and-comedians variety.

Rainer Chlodwig von Kook


About icareviews

Author, Protocols of the Elders of Zanuck: Psychological Warfare and Filth at the Movies

55 comments on “The Donald Deception

  1. icareviews
    July 26, 2015

    Reblogged this on icareviews.


  2. Don Logan
    July 26, 2015

    Liked by 1 person

  3. icareviews
    July 26, 2015

    Readers might be interested in weighing the above against Gregory Hood’s typically articulate but differing opinion at Radix:


  4. Hipster Racist
    July 27, 2015

    Reblogged this on Hipster Racist and commented:

    You beat me to the punch. I was going to title the article “Donald’s Chumps.”

    ANolen is right that Trump is about scaring moderates and “realists” into not opposing the “Bomb Iran” faction.

    Trump has always been a front for Jewish criminal money. I mean, come on, just look at the situation. Manhattan real estate, Atlantic City casinos – as the WSJ said, he’s not really a CEO he just plays one on TV. He’s a front for other people’s money. Sheldon Adelson even?

    His faux-populism – he’s talking about running third party now – hurts Republicans, hurts conservatives and essentially puts Hillary Clinton in the White House.

    Oh yeah he’s always be friends with the Clintons and has the same basic support base as the Clintons. He is as “Republican” as Guiliani and Bloomberg. In NYC, the Republican party is there for the Democrats to use when they want to dump the teachers, coloreds, and their “base” generally and get shit done.

    You know, it’s funny. When I say that “TV news is fictional” and dare suggest anything about “crisis actors” people call me a “conspiracy theorist.” Yet they are literally supporting Donald Trump – a reality TV show actor – for President.

    I mean, I have to ask, do people realize that “The Apprentice” is scripted? It’s fake. It’s like professional wrestling. It isn’t real.

    Oops there I go again with my “conspiracy theories.”


    Liked by 1 person

    • GCM
      August 2, 2015

      “His faux-populism – he’s talking about running third party now – hurts Republicans, hurts conservatives and essentially puts Hillary Clinton in the White House.”

      So does the #cuckservative meme. This term observably means nothing.


      • Hipster Racist
        August 3, 2015

        So does the #cuckservative meme. This term observably means nothing.

        No, the “cuckservative” meme absolutely has a substantial meaning. A “cuckservative” is a White conservative that puts foreign interests over the interests of his own people. Cuckolding.

        The cuckservatives hate this meme because it’s so accurate.


  5. Hipster Racist
    July 27, 2015

    Jews hate Trump because he’s a WASP who beat them at their own NYC real-estate game,

    You see this? This is so dumb it literally hurts my eyes to read it.

    No wonder we’re losing.


    Icareviews, you sure have a way with words. Coffee meet monitor.

    Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      July 27, 2015

      “Zio-catamite” is actually a term I recycled from an older post because I enjoy it so much. I believe I first deployed it against Dennis Miller.


  6. clytemnestra57
    July 27, 2015

    You may consider my position counter-intuitive or just plain-old-contrarian, but I want to present my case for The Donald as this year’s Republican Presidential Candidate as well as Bernie Sanders for the 2016 Democrat Presidential Candidate. I want only those two representing their wings of the duopoly.

    I think I can speak for everyone else when I say that I am annoyed at the idea that the presidency has become such a joke that it should be treated as either an Affirmative Action position (first this, first that, but same idiot of a different color or gender) OR some kind of family birthright. No, just because your daddy and your lame-ass big brother got their shot at ruining the country doesn’t mean it’s your turn, now.

    Both the Democrat Affirmative Action Candidate and the Republican Hereditary Office Candidate have the deepest pockets supporting them. I suspect the additions of establishment candidates like O’Malley and Webb on the left and all those establishment candidates on the right are there to provide enough kabuki theater to con the average American into thinking that there was a real contest going on in either party.

    In the end, unless something dramatic happens in the electorate, the only two left standing will be Hillary Clinton versus Jeb! Bush. AFAIC, it’s six of one, half dozen of the other. Clinton equals Bush. As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton so eloquently screeched it, “What difference does it make?!”

    Who out of the pusillanimous establishment candidates do we want left standing, anyway? You know, the ones who are so busy finding discreet, creative ways to dog-whistle to their constituents while uttering the same, safe boring, politically correct pablum that is scripted for them by their Jewish handlers? Is this going to be another election where the job goes to the candidate who is the best at saying nothing?

    There is a reason why the Democrats worked overtime to change our immigration laws to discriminate against people who shared the same genes as the founding stock. There is a reason why they decided to exploit the Republican greed for cheaper labor to effect this. If the racial composition of the demographics remained the same, they would never win another election. Conversely, by changing the racial composition of the pool of unregistered voters, they give themselves a better chance at holding on to power.

    Bob Whittaker of BUGS made an interesting observation that really opened up my eyes. He pointed out that if the only the same people who were registered to vote in the previous election had shown up, Herbert Hoover would have never been defeated by FDR. In fact, he would have won that election by overwhelming margins. However, a bunch of new people, who had never before bothered to vote, who had registered and voted against Hoover, because they blamed him for the Great Depression.

    Though Ronald Reagan is credited for ending communism, nothing can be further from the truth. What actually happened is Russians voted against communism once Glastnost had ushered in a free and open press. They all turned up and then they crossed out the names of the candidates and wrote “none of the above.” Thanks to all the new intense media scrutiny, new elections had to be called. I think some of the provinces even had a write-in or a box to check off for “none of the above.”

    In the United States, ballots are not set up that way. In fact, it is against the law for any potential candidate for office to change his name to “none of the above.” It is against the law to write in “none of the above.” Try it and see what happens. But it still doesn’t deny the fact that the American people are overdue for a protest vote.

    Unregistered voters are potential voters. The governmedia keeps pushing the meme that only Hope and Change will galvanize those unregistered potential voters to get off their collective asses and vote, but that is wrong. There is another factor that is just as true, but may become increasingly true as time goes on. It’s called “throwing the bums out” or to quote The Donald, “You’re fired!”

    I am under no illusions that if they get behind the wheel, Sanders or Trump will take the country in any other direction but that highway to hell in a handbasket that the country is headed on, but at least we will take a more scenic route.

    If, unregistered voters, the largest demographic out there, show up en masse and present both parties’ primaries with an upset election that ousts the presumptive nominee imagine what kind of message that sends to the establishment. Imagine the fallout when both sides of the duopoly realize that the greatest majority of Americans are very annoyed with them and only sprayed them with ballots … this time.

    Liked by 2 people

    • icareviews
      July 27, 2015

      I had a little exchange with Weev about this on Twitter. His position is that it doesn’t really matter if Trump is a Jew puppet or not as long as he’s doing something to budge the parameters of acceptable political discussion. I understand that viewpoint, but I still find it disconcerting to see so much misplaced adoration for such a grotesque and phony figure. Do these same Twitter trolls get this excited about Pat Buchanan, who is probably twice as honest as Trump? Hardly. It just seems like a lot of these alt-right guys have been sucked in by the media hype and forgotten who their real enemies are.

      Liked by 1 person

  7. DC
    July 27, 2015

    While I don’t think Trump should be viewed as a ‘savior’, I don’t think he’s been brought to the fore as some tactic by TPTB, but is rather a legitimate independent and his own man and as he has his own money, he does not need to kiss ass for campaign funding. I may be wrong and it’s probably too early to know if there’s an ulterior motive behind his campaign, but so far it seems he’s the only one bringing up real issues and his core message is one which causes so much consternation to the communists.

    I have yet to see much evidence that he has an effective solution to America’s dire problems, he probably has not thought that far ahead, nor do I suspect he’s aware of the nest of vipers he’ll be dealing with if he actually does get elected, but that may not even be the point.

    The point is, the stream’s been flowing solidly in one direction for a long time. White people are waking up to the nation’s problems, white people are disgruntled and are feeling powerless, Trump may be the final straw that turns the tide. He may not be, but I do think he’s a wildcard that should not be dismissed casually.

    He has certainly gained the white vote, for now at least, which creates a problem for “them” who would prefer that whites did not get one

    While some of you may not like this source, the guy’s ex-NSA, but I’ve been reading him a bit lately and he does seem a well informed guy on many topics. He wrote a good article the other day on why Trump matters, even if he does not get elected.


    • icareviews
      July 27, 2015

      “I don’t think he’s been brought to the fore as some tactic by TPTB, but is rather a legitimate independent and his own man and as he has his own money, he does not need to kiss ass for campaign funding.”

      But he so obviously DOES need Jewish money and influence, hence his fundamental dishonesty and toadying on the Middle East. Do you think Trump honestly believes all that tripe about Iran and ISIS and what a poor, imperiled, great little ally Israel is? Give me a break. Look, too, at how he’s hashtagged this boot-licking tweet. He’s saying, hey, throw your money at me! I’m the guy who’s going to push the Jewish agenda full-throttle. Or another way of reading it would be, hey, Republicans, want Sheldon Adelson’s money at your disposal? You better start upping the ante on my Shabbos goy talking points.


      • DC
        July 27, 2015

        Not saying you’re wrong, to be honest I’ve not been following Trump’s hashtags.

        Yes, there’s no denying that Trump is part of the establishment and has good relationships with many of the wrong people, but I’m not sure that necessarily makes him “in the know” about how things really work. I doubt he would be the first presidential candidate who did not understand that the Jews run things and the threat they are to the nation.


      • icareviews
        July 27, 2015

        So he knows he has to go bowing and scraping to powerful Jews but somehow doesn’t understand that they run things? How does that work? Clearly, Trump is a whore.

        Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      July 27, 2015

      That 20 Committee site, by the way, has a polished feel to it and is nicely written, but peddles disinformation about terrorism and Jew-sensitive matters. Take that stuff with a grain of salt. I can’t take any commentator seriously who still thinks (or, more likely, pretends to think) cave Arabs pulled 9/11.


      • DC
        July 27, 2015

        I do take the site with a grain of salt. Haven’t spotted any disinformation from it yet, but that’s not to say there isn’t any I’ve only read a few of his articles and not gone that far back through the archives. You’re probably right that he won’t touch the Jews and war on terror, etc. On other topics he’s been good.


    • Hipster Racist
      July 28, 2015

      I just scrolled through 22 pages of “Counterintelligence” headlines on that site, as I did not see one mention of the staggering amount of Israel espionage in the last few decades. From Jonathan Pollard, to the AIPAC scandals a few years ago, to the recent Jeffrey Epstein’s underage prostitution scandal that ensnared Bill Clinton and other high ranking Democrats. Nothing historical about the large number of Jews spying for the USSR during the Cold War.

      It’s just neo-con talking point after neo-con talking point.

      Did I miss something? Is there anything in there about America’s number one counterintelligence threat, the cozy relationship between the Israel lobby and a rogue’s gallery of both Republicans and Democrats?

      To be clear, the fact he’s NSA enhances his credibility, but his silence on Israel is a HUGE red flag.

      What has Donald Trump said that Jeff Sessions has not?

      Liked by 1 person

      • DC
        July 29, 2015


        Trump is a businessman, schmoozing with Jews is good for business. Doesn’t mean the Jews have indulged him in their conspiracy to take down the white Western world.

        Of course he’s a whore, that’s not the point.


        So it’s a limited hangout. OK. Not really surprising.

        Honestly, I was mostly interested in the counterintelligence threat posted by Russia as I have some theories about Russia. The author made some interesting points about Snowden and Wikileaks being Russian assets.

        The Snowden attack on the NSA would seem to undermine the nation’s security it would seem, which is part of their long term strategy: weaken America’s defenses as much as they can without invoking a backlash and make America hated by the rest of the world, this includes unilateral disarmament treaties with Russia that the Russians are blatantly cheating on and the US is not.

        In the Trump article the guy, did hint that the borders had been opened without a people’s referendum and that Trump was within his rights to bring up the topic.

        Trump’s tough talk on making America a strong nation and his bringing up real issues would seem to go against the direction that nation has been taken, but he is vague on his solution to the problem and already seems to be contradicting himself on immigration.

        He may well be a ringer to give Hillary an easy run and will sabotage his campaign run at the last minute we’ll see, but several known shills I follow have all been quick to denounce him, which makes me still entertain the thought that he’s a dark horse in the race.

        Not that I’m investing a vast amount of hope in the man mind you and don’t get me wrong, I think the points in this article are well made. I also do not think that we are ready to replace God with Donald Trump yet.


      • icareviews
        July 29, 2015

        The “New Cold War” is entirely an American provocation. Snowden a Russian asset? Snowden is just another flavor of controlled opposition and hasn’t released much that wasn’t already known before his “revelations”. A. Nolen had some quality posts on that subject.


      • DC
        July 29, 2015


        I’m not buying that America is provoking Russia. I used to subscribe to this point of view, but when you scratch beneath the propaganda, the US is actually letting Russia get away with quite a lot. It is in fact the Russians who seem to be pushing the idea that the US is a global bully and the sole aggressor of Russia through their vast media propaganda network and the US Jews are more than happy for the US to play this role.

        The Elites seem intent on building up Russia and China as military powers, while US political discussion about the threat posed by these countries has become a taboo subject, because of the “special relationship” status of these countries.

        Objectively, Russia and China are the greatest military threats to the US by a long shot and many patriots within the military establishment have voiced their alarm, but rarely do they get much coverage. It’s gotten to the point that it’s only acceptable talk about Arab terrorists (AL-Quaeda, ISIS, etc) as being a threat to the US, while the most dangerous real threats are ignored.

        I don’t think America’s elite is so bumbling and incompetent that this is an oversight on their behalf!

        It’s precisely the opposite of the rhetoric of the Cold War era, but did Communism really collapse and did or simply go underground?

        Joel Skousen has, what I think is a credible theory on this, although this is certainly not an endorsement of the man who runs with the Alex Jones crowd.

        Joel believes the fall of Communism was phoney and done to allow the Russians more time to prepare their war machine to attack America and to allow for a surprise nuclear pre-emptive strike. The NWO crowd is fully on board with this according to Joel because they plan to use this attack on America to justify a global militarized police force and to legitimize the idea of global governance to stop future “rouge nations” from doing the same.

        Past Russian defectors have voiced similar views of Russia’s plans and one even predicted the feigned collapse of the USSR.

        Joel’s thesis is summed up in a long essay on his site, that is worth the time of any patriots to read in my opinion, even if you don’t agree with it:

        According to the NSA guy who runs, it is well known within intelligence circles that the Russians are far ahead of the US in espionage game and I can believe it.


      • icareviews
        July 30, 2015

        Thanks for the laughs, but Aryan Skynet, just so you know, is not a “patriot” site. We don’t believe garbage put out by shills like the idea that it’s “taboo” to talk about Russia as a rising “communist” military threat. Sarah Palin’s worried because she can see the Russians scheming from her backyard, remember? Just a few months ago practically all I was hearing on neocon radio was how Putin shot down that plane and was going to invade Europe, blah blah blah. Remind me who’s encircled whom, again? Is it NATO pushing up to the Russian border or did I miss something and does Putin have armored divisions waiting just the other side of the Rio Grande? And anyway, am I supposed to be more afraid of living under Putin than under Obama? If a nationalist like Putin constitutes a “communist” threat, kindly toss me a hammer-and-sickle banner to wave, comrade.

        Liked by 1 person

      • DC
        July 31, 2015

        Discussion about the Russian threat is not part of the mainstream narrative in the same way that the War On Terror is. Of course there will be banter about Russia from certain groups, but the mainstream media is not making it a main talking point.

        The notion of Putin vs Obama is a false dilemma that WN’s seem to have gotten caught up in, neither of them are “good” for the interests of whites. Neutral to the cause perhaps, but I have some serious doubts about that.

        Like you, I was a Putin supporter (or at least saw him as a better alternative) until the Ukraine situation, when I started seeing funny business on the Russian side and the veneer of Putin being a legitimate opponent to the NWO which is how I saw it up until that time was lost on me.

        I keep reading in the alternative media that NATO is behind the schenanigans in Ukraine, but have found absolutely no evidece that NATO had any involvement in Ukraine whatsoever.

        What IS evident is that Russia was (and is still) actively involved in taking Eastern Ukraine by stealth. This is not Neocon propaganda but a fact of life, and no secret to anyone who has followed events closely.

        You have to ask, why does Russia need to invade neighbouring territories and grab even more territory than it already has? Does this not seem like a step back to USSR times?

        Did you realise that during the Cold War that ethnic Russians were relocated into the Soviet satellite state for the purpose of creating a pretense for Russia to re-invade these territory at a convenient time in future ?

        This seems to be precisely the stunt they pulled in Crimea and is what many observers believe they will do in the Baltic states in a few years time from now.

        All evidence does indeed support to the fact that Russia was behind the downing of flight MH17 by enabling the rebels in Eastern Ukraine. Whether the Neocons are claiming it or not.

        Then, around the time of this event, the Russian media came out with a bunch of bizarre conspiracy theories and red herrings, but all the signs still point to Russia.

        The Russian long term strategy to pre-emptively strike on America idea may well be an exaggerated threat by fear mongers and it certainly does seem a wild theory, but it could well be legit considering that past defectors have come out and stated a nuclear pre-emptive strike on America was the foundation of Soviet strategy for many years and is believed by some to STILL be in place.

        The Russian media is also pumping out anti-US rhetoric 24/7.

        This idea of the US being the aggressor is also prevalent throughout the alternative media.

        The Russian people used to be favorable towards America, but now the average Russian HATES America and sees the US as an existential threat to Russia.

        In fact the entire world now hates America.

        Do you not suspect that this may be the reason why the Jews have manipulated America into so many small scale military conflicts throughout the world? aside from to expend the resources of the US military that is.

        Putin’s no nationalist either, he locks up nationalists who are a threat to his regime or simply murders opponents in cold blood. Dozens of journalists have also died in Russia under Putin’s watch.

        While Putin did make a big show of locking up (and killing) a few of the old oligarchs when he first got into power, he left most of them alone including many Jews still active in Russia, for whom he has made life easier by passing countless Holocaust denials laws that will see anyone who tells the truth thrown into a jail cell.

        The notion that Putin is boldly defending his nation against a global bully gone astray is propaganda that both the Russian media and Western alternative media seem to be promoting and it makes me wonder if there is some connection between the two, but from what I see the US is not seriously trying to hurt Russia. They’re soft on Russia, it’s is pure theater and a tactic, I believe by the Jews to destroy America as a nation.

        It would be more truthful I think to say that Putin is fronting an old establishment that never went away and could never be trusted.

        He might crack down on fags and promote traditional values, but so what?
        He’s still commander in chief of the military power most capable of completely transforming the way of life of white Americans.

        I’m not trying to change anyone’s view or to get into an argument over this. This is my own research, which to the best of my ability is based on facts on the ground, not memes promoted in the mainstream media.

        I’ll leave it up to you to decide whether I’m on the right track or not.


      • icareviews
        July 31, 2015

        I won’t defend the Holocaust denial laws or every aspect of the Putin regime. Keep in mind, though, that he’s dealing with a global Zionist media that has several times compared him to Hitler, the sort of talk that has also targeted people like American bogeys Saddam Hussein and Bashar Assad. Here’s all you need to know about American intentions in the Ukraine:


      • Hipster Racist
        July 31, 2015

        I am not a Putin supporter and never have been, in fact, I got into it with an author here, Don Logan, about it.

        But the Ukraine “revolution” was yet another “color revolution” promoted by the Usual Suspects (George Soros, for one) and generally speaking it’s been NATO – NOT Russia – that has been the aggressor since the Cold War.

        There are no “good guys” and “bad guys.” If I was Russian, I’d probably support Putin because he isn’t a stooge of Western bankers like Yeltsin was.

        The idea the US should be afraid of Russia is pearl-clutching of the most pathetic variety that only some FOXtard could actually believe.

        Plus, the idea that the fall of the USSR was “faked” so they had time to secretly build up their nukes in order to first strike against the USA …

        … and they call *ME* a “conspiracy theorist?”

        Liked by 1 person

      • DC
        July 31, 2015

        On the original topic again, I think I’ve just about come round to thinking that you were right and there’s no shadow of a doubt that Trump is a non starter and not a misguided patriot and that he will most likely flip his stance on immigration if he wins the primaries. This was after this statement on top of a bunch of lies that he finds lobbying and political disloyalty to the US shameful:

        “Actually I’m surprised that Israel isn’t putting tremendous pressure on Schumer because they do have a lot of power over Schumer,” Trump said, implying a sitting U.S. senator’s vote could be swayed by the pressure of a foreign power.


      • DC
        July 31, 2015

        ***But the Ukraine “revolution” was yet another “color revolution” promoted by the Usual Suspects (George Soros, for one) and generally speaking it’s been NATO – NOT Russia – that has been the aggressor since the Cold War.***

        I’ve followed these theories, but I’ve found no solid evidence that the US was behind the maiden protests. This view seems to only be promoted in the alternative media, with very little to back it up. Nulan’s “F*#! the EU” comment was just that, a comment, taken out of context and promoted by the media to create the idea in people’s minds that the US was somehow to main instigator in the events which took place. There is has been no real evidence that I’ve found of any concrete funding from the US, only examples of media memes presented as “fact”.

        That being said if you can find me some solid evidence that the US was behind events in Ukraine I’m all ears.

        In fact it is Russia that has far more extensive influence in Ukraine and was in a position to create funny business and push it’s agenda, which for a long time has been to promote the idea of a US threat. Skousen believes this is to create a pretense for a future war that has been long in the planning, so that when they do strike the US, it will appear to be justified by the rest of the world.

        The war could also be promoted via proxy nations like North Korea to make it seem like the real powers had nothing to do with it.

        ***Plus, the idea that the fall of the USSR was “faked” so they had time to secretly build up their nukes in order to first strike against the USA …

        … and they call *ME* a “conspiracy theorist?”***

        I’ll be the first to admit the idea seems extremely far-fetched, but is what the Jews have done to the Western world over the last 300 years any less far fetched? Think of who we’re dealing about here. Who better to deceive the world than Satan himself? Can you ever really rule out anything of such magnitude from our enemies?

        I’m sure both of the World Wars would also have seemed ludicrous, before they happened too!

        Also think about how our enemies would need to deceive those who follow the alternative media and are more alert than the general population. Think about which direction certain alternative media figures have been steering us and which direction they’re steering us away from, even those who are supposedly legit because they talk about the Jews.

        The idea is so extreme that it will be far off most people’s radars, which is right where they’d want us I imagine.

        You also need to examine things from the perspective of how the men at the top think and their long term agenda, which is to break down national boundaries and mix us all together. While free trade and open borders achieve this, to an extent by stealth, a world war can achieve a lot to this end in a different way and already has done in the past.

        And make no mistake, America is the largest thorn in their side, even though they virtually control it outright. They still can’t have their way with America the way they’d like to and must still get the approval of citizens and get around the Constitution and Bill of Rights which were originally written to stop the likes of them.

        Liked by 1 person

      • DC
        August 1, 2015

        Anatoliy Golitsyn is the most important Soviet KGB defector who I was thinking of the other day. He predicted the feigned demise of the Soviet Union.

        It was as much about bring in billions of free Western aid to build up Russia’s energy infrastructure and make Europe dependent on Russian energy as it was to deceive the West, which the Communists have used to undermine the West.

        If/when the war comes, Europe will be completely starved of energy resources and at Russia’s mercy.

        And this website does a much better job of documenting Russia’s false media reports than I can recount of the top of my head. It was originally set up to document Russia’s lies about Ukraine.

        Putin is running a slick media propaganda campaign through it’s RT outlet and other networks to turn American dissidents against NATO and its own government.

        While I have no objection to dissidents opposing the JEWS within government, it could also be seen as a ploy to get patriots to attack the Constitution, Bill of Rights and the American way of life for white Americans, which is certainly not in white people’s interests.

        With regards to NATO bashing: while I am certainly no fan of NATO and real American aggression around the world, I can certainly see why Russia would have us believe that NATO is encroaching on it’s borders so as to and drum up global opposition to NATO.

        NATO was originally set up to stop Communist aggression against Europe. Think about what would happen if NATO were to be abandoned one day. The door would be wide open for Russia to waltz right into Eastern Europe and have it’s way with her.

        While the general consensus in WN, I gather, is that this would be a GOOD thing, I’d urge you to think about what General Patton said about the threat of the soviets after WWII.

        I think it’s clear to everyone here that white America is being destroyed from within by our own government, but the belief that Putin is a better alternative is a false dichotomy.


      • icareviews
        August 1, 2015

        The Soviet Union was created and propped up by western money. The whole Cold War was largely a feeding frenzy for the military-industrial complex, and as Sam Dickson has pointed out, it was revealed after the collapse of the U.S.S.R. that it had a GDP comparable to that of the Netherlands – clearly not a credible threat to the whole of the West. The Russians defeated the Third Reich only through the wrong-headed largesse of the Allies. Just go on ignoring evidence like the presence of American puppet forces on Russia’s borders, the incessant neocon propaganda vilifying Russia, and the smoking-gun Nuland phone call if you want; you’ve said nothing to convince us that our “own government” is somehow less toxic than Putin’s or that Putin is scheming to get us to hate our Constitution. Why would Putin even need “a ploy to get patriots to attack the Constitution, Bill of Rights and the American way of life for white Americans” when Democrats and Republicans are already attacking these things with almost no impediment?


      • DC
        August 2, 2015

        No I agree with you, Russia is only one arm of the NWO and is less of a threat than the threat from within, though there are certainly Communist forces that have infiltrated the United States. How heavily America has been infiltrated by Communism is a debatable point, but it’s been going on since WWII.

        My position is that the East/West conflict dialect is phoney. It is theater exaggerated by the media including the alternative media that is heavily infiltrated by TPTB in my opinion.

        …And that Russia and China as a combined military power could possibly be used in the war against traditional conservative white America in addition to what the government is already doing, and that Putin is no ally of the white cause.

        I’m not entirely sure you could say the Russians and Western elite are working together in secret behind closed doors, but they are certainly working towards the same end.

        As to the U.S.S.R being “revealed” to have a GDP of less than the Netherlands, well if they did stage a collapse then of course they would say something like that, but why does GDP matter when Russia is clearly and verifyably the number 2 military power on the planet and have the best spy network on the planet.

        They might have been talking about the civilian budget, but for a “broke” country, they’ve sure spared no expense on building up their military over the years.

        As for the Neocons, they want perpetual war so they need external threats. Like a broken clock is still right twice a day just because they’re saying it doesn’t mean anything and I think Nuland was taken out of context to promote the phoney narrative.

        Yes America has been acting like an aggressive bully against small weak countries, but they are not seriously encroaching on Russia’s territory that I can see. That’s what Putin’s telling the Russians though and is what our alternative media is saying, and I don’t trust either of them.

        Not really trying to convince anyone of anything. It’s just my theory, based on my own research, but I am not the only own who sees it this way. Scott Roberts is another lone voice in the WN community who has warned about Russia and China and in fact was one who inspired me to take a closer look in this direction.

        It might just be paranoia taken too far, but is it? It seems there are plenty of warning signs if you look for them, like for example Clinton’s passing of PDD 60, which orders the military to absorb a nuclear first strike, the failure of the US to upgrade and modernize their missile defense systems, Obamas culling of patriotic generals from the US military, while promoting homosexuals and women not to mention the little concealed secret that the Western elite and in particularly Israel have facilitated the transfer of US military technology secrets to China.

        Why would they be doing that would you say?


  8. mark fleagle
    July 27, 2015

    Donald Trump has enjoyed a meteoric rise in popularity since his announcement for the 2016 presidential election.

    Donald Trump is bringing up real issues…


    1. “Is opening up flood gates and allowing Obama to give blanket amnesty to the millions of illegal aliens really a good thing???”

    2. “Do we really need another puppet that is lost without their teleprompter???”

    Nationalism is the starting point…

    Individualism becomes the next logical step in downsizing Government.


    • icareviews
      July 27, 2015

      Whites are well stocked with individualism. What we need is tribalism.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      July 28, 2015

      1. is a legitimate and important issue.

      2. is not. All politicians use teleprompters. Donald Trump reads from a script on his TV show “The Apprentice.”

      That sort of Rush Limbaugh type stuff might impress some people, but not me. Democrats used to make jokes about Bush and his teleprompter. Bush could barely read a speech coherently. Saying Obama sucks because of the teleprompter is lowest-common-denominator partisanship of the MSNBC/FOX News variety.

      Let’s see Trump make a single case about restricting LEGAL immigration or saying anything overtly pro-White.

      So far he’s WORSE than Jeff Sessions on immigration.

      Liked by 1 person

  9. thebillyc
    July 27, 2015

    well- I was kind of enjoying the supposed “Trump memes the disaffection”- but “chumps” is actually good. controlled opposition, again. : (( aryanskynet is right, again. jewish front for money laundering- nailed it!! I mean, how many times can one dude go bankrupt, and still keep getting money for gambling casinos… until the oil money runs out, we are so fucked. third party = hitlery.

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Hipster Racist
    July 28, 2015

    No one answered the question:

    I believe:

    A) On The Apprentice, Donald Trump decides who to fire and who to hire based on his objective judgement, as a CEO, of the business savvy and work ethic of the “apprentices” and how they complete the assignments given to them.

    B) On The Apprentice, the writers and producers decide what happens based solely on ratings considerations and the apprentices are really actors playing a role, sometimes improvisationally.

    In my view, your answer to that questions shows how much grasp you have on reality vs. fantasy.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      July 28, 2015

      I see not a single person has the guts to answer my question about Donald Trump’s “Reality TV Show” “The Apprentice.”

      So I’ll push the “like” button on my own comment, just to drive the point home.

      My little teenage cousin, about 14 years old, really truly believes that “The Apprentice” and other reality TV shows are “real” and not scripted.

      But she’s a 14 year old girl.

      What’s YOUR excuse?

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Hipster Racist
    July 28, 2015

    Interestingly, Trump was also a main promoter of “birtherism” – the scandal over Obama’s birth certificate. Whatever the truth of Obama’s birth, that “scandal” was being promoted by Israelis – the front person was an Israeli woman that wasn’t even a US citizen as far as I can tell – and it was meant to pressure Obama into bombing Iran.

    Considering that keeping the US out of a war with Iran is likely the only good thing Obama has done for his entire presidency, and considering that the people behind the “birth certificate issues” were Israeli interests …

    … what does that say about Trump?

    I haven’t been watching the TV so I have missed all of Donald Trump’s inspiring speeches about the interests of White people, but it is perfectly obvious what is going on here. Donald Trump is a Zionist asset, working in the interests of a foreign regime, and has always been a goy front for Jewish money laundering.

    That he throws some rhetoric around about illegal immigration is expected, that is what Republicans do. That we have seemingly intelligent conservative and pro-white men screaming like teenage girls at a Justin Bieber concert whenever Donald Trump does so is somewhat surprising, but getting less and less surprising as time goes on.

    Donald Trump is more than willing to say that Israel should remain a Jewish state.

    Has Donald Trump said that America should remain a White nation?

    That tells you all you need to know now doesn’t it?

    Liked by 2 people

    • Don Logan
      July 28, 2015

      Good point about the people behind “birtherism.” The grand dame behind that was an Israeli woman named Orly Taitz.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Hipster Racist
        July 28, 2015

        Orly Taitz.

        Right, thank you, I had forgotten her name.


  12. Hipster Racist
    July 28, 2015

    Gene Simmons, the Zionist Jew that used to front the rock band KISS, tells us that Donald Trump is a “good family man” and that your children reflect the kind of person you are.

    So, if your daughter converts to Judaism and marries a Jew, that makes you a “good” person. Presumably, considering the history of KISS, if your teenage daughters sends naked pictures of herself to Jewish rock stars, that makes you a good father.

    You know, that “cuckold” thing might be more significant than I thought.

    You all should be ashamed of yourself taking this Donald Trump stuff seriously.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      July 28, 2015

      So the two Republicans that Trump has gone after – John McCain and Lindsey Graham.

      What do they have in common? They are both hard core supporters of the Israel Lobby that are likely being blackmailed. Graham is a barely-closeted homosexual and McCain did propaganda broadcasts for the Vietnamese Communists after his capture.

      What do you think the message is here?

      “Graham, I got your private phone number.”

      “McCain, you ain’t really a war hero.”

      Two loyal supporters of Israel are having their blackmailable issues hinted at during a campaign. Isn’t it obvious this is meant to send a message to other politicians? As suggested in the article, this puts pressure on people who might otherwise support the nuclear deal with Iran.

      Come on, think people, step up your game a little bit.

      Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        July 28, 2015

        Shut up, you crypto-illegal immigration shill conspiracy theorist! Hail Trump and may Odin bestow his blessings on Vice President Oprah!

        Liked by 1 person

  13. sonofeurope
    July 28, 2015

    All you need to know about Trump:

    Dump Trump.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. rjamesd9
    July 28, 2015

    Compelling evidence. Wish it were otherwise.

    Liked by 2 people

  15. Hipster Racist
    July 28, 2015

    Here’s another thing. Look at the picture of Trump and his daughter with Nelson Mandela.

    Trump’s daughter is drop dead gorgeous. She is prime White breeding stock. The woman could have any man she wanted.

    But for some reason she wound up converting to Judaism so she could marry a Jew and have Jewish babies.

    What does that say about Trump?

    Trump is a second-degree cuckold. He is, essentially, now Jewish and his grandchildren, if he has any, will be Jewish.

    Same with Hillary Clinton, by the way. Chelsea married a secular Jew, so there was no official conversion, but is there any doubt – ANY doubt at ALL – that Clinton’s granddaughter will grow up in a Jewish milieu and identify as Jewish?

    In the recent article posted here, “Future Castes of America,” the author suggested that Whites will be degraded to servicing a Jewish ruling class by managing an increasingly Mestizo lower class.

    You’re seeing it folks – it’s here. The most powerful Whites like the Clintons and Trumps marry their sons and daughters into the Tribe. This is exactly how the Tribe sustains itself, by incorporating the best White genetics – and the fortunes of men like Trump through inheritance.

    Good lord, just think what would happen if Trump or Clinton actually became President? Their only children and their potential future grandchildren are/will be Israeli citizens.

    Should we just move the capital to Tel Aviv now and get it over with?

    When will your sons – and daughters, now – be signing up to defend God’s Chosen and their Holy Land from the billions of Muslims?

    Who wants to be first to have their son – or daughter – give their life for the Holy Jews and come home in a body bag?

    Trump’s chumps.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. indravaruna
    July 28, 2015

    “In the recent article posted here, “Future Castes of America,” the author suggested that Whites will be degraded to servicing a Jewish ruling class by managing an increasingly Mestizo lower class.”

    This is something that has been planned or at least happening for a long time, Prof. Revilo Oliver wrote that a good part of the British aristocracy had intermarried with Jewish London bankers by the end of the 19th century, the current British Prime-Minister David Cameron is the result of such breeding:

    The Anglo-American Elite is jewish.

    Liked by 2 people

  17. Hipster Racist
    July 29, 2015

    So, Trump wants to deport the criminals, amnesty the “good illegal immigrants” and increase legal immigration. He says he “loves immigration” and that his wife is an immigrant.

    He’s WORSE on immigration than some of the regular Republicans

    I just watched his famous Arizona speech – big f-ing deal. Platitude after platitude after platitude. He even had professional shouters – “salts” – you know like comedians do – in the audience to give him more hype.

    Folks, turn off the TV, it ain’t good for your brain.

    Donald Trump Supports Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants

    ALIPAC is putting out a national press release on July 28, 2015, regarding Donald Trump’s unpopular support for amnesty for illegal aliens. (click to read)

    While Donald Trump quickly rushed to the front of the GOP primary race by talking tough about illegal immigration, securing the borders, cracking down on Mexico’s intentional efforts to send their criminal population into the US, and bashing amnesty supporters like Jeb Bush, John McCain, and Lindsey Graham, we must regretfully add him to the amnesty supporter list.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Pingback: Stack the Deck: The Trump Candidacy Considered as Cryptographic Prank | Aryan Skynet

  19. vikingbitch
    August 3, 2015

    Reblogged this on vikingbitch's Blog and commented:
    I have not been following the Donald Trump debacle because I do not care. He is not saying anything different that the everyday working stiffs in the former USA have not been saying for decades.


    Now he gets press because he is loaded. Same ole’ bullsugar. Yeah.

    It is good to be rich in the USA because you say, do, kill, bankrupt, shit on whomever you please. It is the Plantation of Psychopaths.

    I do not need to read about what Trump says. I have LIVED it.


  20. Pingback: B’Man’s 2016 POTUS Watch: Donald Trump | B'Man's Revolt

  21. Pingback: Asleep at the Wheel: Trump-Drunk Alt-Right Swerves Off-Course in Promotion of Fake Billionaire | Aryan Skynet

  22. Pingback: Donald Trump: The Soros Connection | Aryan Skynet

  23. Pingback: Organized Slime: Political Mutants Trump and Bloomberg Blow Muck-Bubbles of Mockumentary Media Bombast-Bluster-Bunkum | Aryan Skynet

  24. Pingback: Infiltrating the Republican Party | Aryan Skynet

  25. Pingback: Reasons Not to Like Donald Trump from a Jew-Wise Racialist Perspective – Think Racially

  26. Pingback: Hit ‘Em Up: Donald Trump and the 9/11 Jew Money Mafia | Aryan Skynet

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on July 26, 2015 by and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: