Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Anti-Zionism: Good for the Jews

Gilad Atzmon

Gilad Atzmon: “Jewish power is defined as the power to suppress the discussion on Jewish power”

In an interesting American Free Press article titled “Are Liberal Anti-Zionists More Dangerous Than Israeli Jews?”, John Friend interviews Gilad Atzmon about the motivations underlying Jewish involvement in anti-Zionism.

Atzmon turned the discussion to the usurpation of the Palestinian Solidarity movement by leftist Jewish activists in order to advance broader Jewish interests and protect the ethnic nature of the Jewish state of Israel.

“In an interview a few years back, Philip Weiss, the chief editor of the Jewish pro-Palestinian website Mondoweiss, admitted to me in plain terms that in his eyes pro-Palestinian activism serves Jewish ‘self interests’,” said Atzmon. “Such a Jewish activity conveys a misleading image of Jewish political pluralism. It suggests that not all Jews are ‘bad’ and that Jewish politics can even be ethical and universal.”

Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss: “self interests”

Atzmon argues that the Jewish left is “far more problematic and dangerous than hardcore right-wing Zionism.” Zionism is an open celebration of Jewish identity, nationalism and ethnocentrism, the so-called “Jewish symptom,” as Atzmon describes it. Leftist Jews attempt to deny to the rest of us access to that symptom, Atzmon contends.

“If Jewish power is defined as the power to suppress the discussion on Jewish power, Mondoweiss, Jewish Voices for Peace, Democracy Now!, Noam Chomsky and others are there to pursue that task day and night,” Atzmon argues. “They crudely restrict the boundaries of the discourse by means of ‘political correctness’” and defining what topics are permissible to discuss.

“Mondoweiss went as far as banning any criticism of Israel within the context of Jewishness,” Atzmon explained. “This duplicitous attempt to subvert the discourse worked for a while. However, not anymore, and I take some credit for it.”

During his talk in San Diego, Atzmon explained that in the past the Palestinian right of return defined the Palestinian cause in ethical, political and legal terms. However, “the growing domination of liberal Jews within the movement diluted this elementary right,” Atzmon continued.

The discourse relating to the Palestinian struggle was replaced by “a tsunami of misleading, faulty terminology designed to appease some diaspora Jews and whatever is left of the Israeli ‘left’,” Atzmon noted. “All of that was done at the expense of the Palestinians. While the right of return located the Palestinian plight within an accurate historical, political, legal and moral context, the newly imposed terminology, e.g, ‘End of Occupation’, ‘Colonialism,’ ‘Apartheid’ and even BDS (post-2010) is legitimizing the Jewish state within pre-1967 borders. It dismisses the refugees, Gaza and the Palestinian diaspora’s plight.”

This is the old game of the Judas goat, as defined by the late Michael Collins Piper – the crucial factor in the gelding and neutralization of American conservatism. What has happened with anti-Zionism is that resistance to Israel has been diverted into a controlled opposition not only to occupation of Palestine, but to Jewish criminality generally. Those Jews who most vociferously oppose Israeli foreign policy are just as likely to name-drop the “Holocaust” and to pooh-pooh “conspiracy theories”.

The above video of Noam Chomsky pretending to “debunk” the idea that 9/11 was an elaborate false flag attack has received more than 87,000 hits since it was first uploaded in 2008. This writer was one of those once swayed by Chomsky’s authority as a respected academic into disregarding such frightening allegations about America’s prevailing order. “Even if it were true, which is extremely unlikely, who cares?” Chomsky dismisses the questioners’ doubts. This line alone ought to have given Chomsky away.

Norman Finkelstein is another representative anti-Zionist Jew. Speaking here in 2012, Finkelstein concedes that much of American Jewish opposition to Zionist extremism is just a matter of keeping up appearances of loyalty to the United States:

Although Israel pushed hard for the U.S. to attack Iraq in 2003, American Jews significantly opposed it, and opposed it in even greater percentages, in retrospect, as the U.S. invasion turned into a debacle. In part, the opposition sprang from the fact that liberals generally opposed the war, but it also sprang from the fear of American Jews that they would be scapegoated because of Israel’s warmongering and the prominent role Jewish neoconservatives played in beating the drums of war.

Norman Finkelstein: "I try to impress the younger generation."

Norman Finkelstein: “I try to impress the younger generation.”

Public relations, not morality, are paramount, and anti-Zionism as an end in itself is suspect for other reasons. To play the respectable game of campus anti-Zionism is to constantly protest, “But I’m not a Nazi. I’m not against Jews. I’m only opposed to Zionism!” To be anti-Zionist and anti-Zionist alone, but still hope to salvage the Aryan race, is to toe the unnavigable tightrope of those Republican hacks who howl their disingenuous admiration of MLK, proclaim themselves the party of Lincoln, and endlessly whimper that “the Democrats are the real racists!” Opposition to Jewish power is thereby confined to the ghetto of social justice and anti-racism.

Reducing Judaic behavior to ideology is the same as amnestying the Jew who promotes it, and leaves out so many other, clearly non-ideological offenses. Harping on Zionism ignores the ethnic hostility linking Benjamin Netanyahu to Bernie Madoff and Tim Wise to Al Goldstein. Oppose Jewish power in any guise. Let the burden of too much protesting fall to the Jewish adversary. Call them out for what they are and force them into the open, into the ludicrous pose of pretending that they do not exhibit that tell-tale “Jewish symptom”, and let the enemy walk the tightrope for a change.

Rainer Chlodwig von Kook

Advertisements

About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

11 comments on “Anti-Zionism: Good for the Jews

  1. icareviews
    July 13, 2015

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  2. Don Logan
    July 13, 2015

    I agree totally. But I still think ZOG sounds better than JOG!

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Don Logan
    July 14, 2015

    Don’t necessarily agree with this video but worth examining:

    Liked by 1 person

  4. When I was in college, I fell hard for the “progressive, anti-war” nonsense. I fanatically read/watched Democracy Now!, Chomsky, Glenn Greenwald, Anti-War.com (Scott Horton is Jewish, I’m pretty sure; if not, he is totally against discussing basic facts about Jews [after all, that’s “anti-Semitic”]), Harper’s Magazine, etc. No doubt, these individuals/outlets produce valuable content, often written in a very intelligent, powerful manner. I still honestly think Greenwald is a phenomenally talented writer.

    But you’re absolutely right. These Jews will never, and I mean never, get to the heart of the matter because it indicts their very existence. I always found it amazing, and I often emailed these people about this, that Greenwald, Goodman, Chomsky, etc. could go on and on and on about the fraudulent “War on Terrorism,” and not even question the officially sanctioned conspiracy theory explaining it.

    Dr. Jim Fetzer, who is an academic that I absolutely admire and respect, totally trashes Chomsky here if you haven’t seen it:

    Cheers,
    John

    Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      July 14, 2015

      Democracy Now! . . . ugh. I can’t listen to NPR for very long. The last time I had one of those shows on – Fresh Air or All Things Considered or one of those – the expert Jew guest on Middle East affairs was spouting pure neocon propaganda, just packaged in NPR’s trademark soft-spoken, non-threatening tones for the consumption of liberal listeners. Utterly appalling.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Hipster Racist
        July 15, 2015

        The joke about Chomsky has always been, “I agree with him on politics, but he’s wrong on grammar.”

        No one gives a shit about Chomsky’s linguistics academic cover. He’s a propagandist and a very effective one.

        Fetzer, in that video, purports to “debunk” Chomsky via a long, boring ass diatribe about linguistics. No one gives a shit if Chomsky gets “debunked” on universal grammar. That’s not the point of Chomsky.

        That Chomsky is openly and obviously lying about 9/11 is interesting, a really interesting fact, and Realist Report and Jim Fetzer want to bury that, so what better way than becoming an official “debunker” of Chomsky and distract everyone talking about undergrad linguistics?

        See how it works? 99% of the people turned off the video during the third sentence about senior year linguistics blah blah blah. But it takes attention away from the meat of things, Chomsky’s ridiculous lies about 9/11.

        You know, Cass Sunstein said you need to “cognitively infiltrate online communities that think 9/11 was done by the government or Israel.” He was hired by the Obama administration. Now we have blogs like VeteransToday and VeteransNewsNow that do “conspiracy theories” that ignore and obscure the major issues; controlled demolition, the thermetic material in the dust, AE911Truth, the 9/11 families, the lawsuits.

        Instead they publish Jim Fetzer talking about Judith Wood’s energy beams “mini-nukes” and blah blah blah.

        Realist Report is full of it, knowingly. He’s not a spammer, and he’s not a “crisis actor” – he’s an extra.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Hipster Racist
      July 15, 2015

      Dr. Jim Fetzer, who is an academic that I absolutely admire and respect

      Fetzer is the most effective 9/11 disinformation artist I’ve ever witnessed. He infiltrated Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the most credible 9/11 group, and made so much trouble making up so much bullshit that they finally threw him out. The very best people in the 9/11 Truth movement distanced themselves from him.

      He was extremely good at what he did, too. Right when the engineers and architects started cooperating with other disciplines – history, psychology, politics, the eye-witnesses, the various people that had been fired, attacked, arrested and otherwise punished for openly and materially debunking the official 9/11 conspiracy theory, that is when Fetzer injected himself and started promoting crazy bullshit – like Judith Woods and her “energy beams” soundbite.

      For the average person spending five seconds attention on something – thermite, energy beams – both articles have a cool looking graph and video too. Who knows? It’s all physics to me!

      So then the “debunkers” can point to Jim Fetzer and Judith Woods and say – hey, these nuts think that Bush used lazer beams to blow up the World Trade Center! And they also have a conspiracy about it being a controlled demolition. Crazy nuts!

      I admire Dr. Jim Fetzer the same way I admire L. Ron Hubbard.

      Realist Report, you are obviously a smart guy, so the idea you really “admire and respect” a disinformation artist – and the fact Fetzer is disinfo is obviously to anyone who spent more than an hour on it – is, as they say, untenable. I, for one, don’t believe you at all. I don’t believe for one second that you really “admire and respect” Jim Fetzer, at least, in the sense you “admire and respect” him for telling the truth.

      Come on, it’s going to take something better than Jim Fetzer and all that VeteransToday nonsense to impress anyone here.

      Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        July 15, 2015

        I only knew of Fetzer in connection with his involvement in the Sandy Hook demimonde. I never looked at any of his material on 9/11 and wasn’t aware he had been in the Judy Woods/energy weapons camp. Disconcerting, to say the least.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Hipster Racist
    July 16, 2015

    Reblogged this on Hipster Racist and commented:

    It’s expected that Jews, like any other ethnic group, would look out for their own interests and favor their own. Most White people just tend to think of Jews as some sub-group, like Irish, or Greeks.

    But the organized Jewish community promotes immigration and turning the majority into a minority, and they become the leaders of the anti-white coalition, which is essentially what the Democratic party has become. The Democratic party is run by a handful of Jews and includes anyone and everyone who is not a normal White family. It’s all other ethnic groups, plus “dissident” Whites, and they all promote bringing in massive amounts of non-White immigrants to overwhelm the majority.

    But of course, in their country, Israel, they support the exact opposite policies – they support a Jewish state, they ruthlessly purge unwanted immigrants, and they demand that Jews retain their majority there.

    The secret’s out and the internet has destroyed their media monopoly, so it will be quite interesting to see what they do in the future.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. kerberos616
    November 27, 2015

    Reblogged this on Kerberos616.

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: