Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

In Defense of David Duke

The Doctor will see you now.

The Doctor will see you now.

David Duke has always been a “controversial” person across the political spectrum in our post-World War II world. While it’s not surprising that doctrinaire liberals, the “politically correct”, would find him repugnant, it is somewhat baffling (and revelatory – but we’ll get to that later) to this writer why he is so reviled in many corners of the White Nationalist milieu. I believe, per contra, with some minor qualifications, that Duke is ultimately a resource in seeding White racial consciousness to growing numbers of truth seekers by leveraging his fame (infamy works as well) to amplify the message far beyond what the typical racialist blog, including your eminent Aryan Skynet, has the capacity to do.

Duke 1.0; or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Gas Chamber

Dr. Duke 1.0; or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Gas Chamber

Duke has consciously evolved his image over the years to appeal to a broader base of people, including non-Whites. He’s what the “hate watch” partisans have dubbed a “mainstreamer” as opposed to the “revolutionary” (e.g., William Pierce, Louis Beam, Harold Covington). Duke went from being an admirer of George Lincoln Rockwell in his youth, inspiring him to don a brownshirt at LSU, then a Louisiana Klan Grand Wizard outfit, and finally becoming a smartly dressed state legislator with a polished, rational rhetoric digestible to many Whites.

The Wiz Kid

The Wiz

In short, he evolved from the failed strategies of White Nationalism 1.0 to the ascendant White Nationalism 2.0, the populist, big-tent ideal espoused here at AS. The less strident rhetoric constitutes heresy, of course, for some of those still stuck in detention at the school of WN 1.0. Belief in the “Holocau$t” has become a litmus test for many and Duke has failed this test according to the hardliners, despite having an entire chapter that critiques its historicity in his autobiography, My Awakening, and steadfastly defending revisionists while calling for the abrogation of Jewish-concocted laws against questioning the orthodox narrative in Europe.

The personable image and toned-down rhetoric that broadly appealed to lower- and middle-class Whites, coupled with political instinct and industrious organizing, won him a seat in the Louisiana legislature in 1989. Steeled with the confidence that victory gave him, he ran for US Senate in 1990, receiving 43% of the vote, and Governor of Louisiana, which shockingly resulted in a runoff election against crook Edwin Edwards (later convicted of racketeering for which he served eight years in prison). That particular election was educational for White advocates – the entire media, corporate, and political establishment came down like a furious Yahweh. They essentially threatened to crucify Louisiana, ultimately tilting the election in favor of Edwards, even though Duke had won 60% of his constituency – in other words, the White vote. SJWs of the time even had bumper stickers that read: “Vote for the crook – it’s important.”

Honk if you hate honkies!

Honk if you hate honkies!

Revolutionaries of the time, such as William Pierce, didn’t openly criticize Duke. Rather, they championed him; but I suspect that these endorsements were somewhat disingenuous on account of their firmly held conviction that change through the “system” was impossible. Perhaps they valued the propaganda potential of having someone on their side thrust into the limelight. Incidentally, Duke certainly diluted or kept mum about more radical ideas such as separation and focused on pro-White policies with respect to welfare abuse, crime, and “affirmative action”. It was a Pyrrhic victory with limited aims for Duke, a model to inspire likeminded Whites in a war that would last generations.

Duke later ran for President and did relatively poorly. I won’t explore what may have prompted Duke to run for President, but the aggregate result of his political endeavors were to raise his profile to a national and international level and demonstrate the validity and popularity of implicitly pro-White policies. Aside from his initial victory in 1989, the vast array of opposition he faced in the subsequent elections, particularly the governor’s runoff, had shown that “Never Again” was more than a silly slogan, and it seemingly demonstrated the truth of the revolutionaries’ claim, that change could not come from within the system.

Nice Guy Syndrome?

Nice Guy Syndrome?

While the revolutionaries were still at least nominally on board with him, many of them have decamped over the last several years, with some of them openly hostile. His new style just doesn’t accord with their more rigid ideological viewpoints. Duke has become the postmodern White advocate: he has assimilated the vernacular of multiculturalism, liberal democracy, equality, and globalism, and deftly repackaged them to serve as ideological supports for White Nationalism. And he got a PhD, which he and his followers won’t let you forget (“Dr. Duke”), but that is forgivable considering we need all the credibility we can muster. Duke talks about “human freedom” for “all peoples” and values “true diversity”.

On one of his YouTube videos, he proclaimed that “Diversity is a great thing when it comes to the world. Thank God that we have different nations, cultures, languages, religions, art, music, and even different races that have unique forms of beauty and expression.” The subtext is clear: “unique forms” that must be preserved by separation, control of immigration, and a financial sector and mass media not dominated by racial aliens. There is no gross disparagement of other cultures or races and there is an egalitarian fair-mindedness to accord White interests the same degree of worthiness as that of any other ethnic group or race in their own territory. Some of these ideas were expressed much earlier by the European New Right through such writers as Alain de Benoist. More recently, Eurasianism-curious Richard Spencer of Radix and the National Policy Institute, a man that seems to delight in taking contrary positions and upsetting the expectations of American Rightists, has claimed cheekily that he embraces multiculturalism.

Spencer for Ire

Spencer for Ire

Needless to say, this rhetoric rankles the hardliners. I imagine Duke must enjoy a private laugh though at this sort of Jew-jitsu – hijacking the weaponized vernacular of Cultural Marxism and redirecting it for pro-White interests, anathema to its Jewish innovators and overzealous practitioners. In effect, it softens the edge to racial politics for deracinated Whites steeped in guilt and timorous at hearing more aggressive 1.0 expressions like “White Power” and is effective propaganda that may provide the entry point for the cause. As the demographic tidal wave continues to reshape the White world, more Whites will undoubtedly become susceptible to this style of argument.

A Portrait of the Racist as an Old Brony

A Portrait of the Racist as an Old Brony

Without question, the most contentious aspect to Duke’s approach is his laser-guided focus on Jews, Zionism, and Israel, and most controversially, his solidarity with the Palestinians’ cause and the Islamic world more generally. Libertarian Realist’s video (below) encapsulates many of the major anti-Duke arguments from this perspective. The foundation to this argument lies with the mistaken belief that Jews, as a group, are not a major threat to the White Western world. Some proponents of this argument will acknowledge that Jews are generally very “liberal” and have enormous influence. Some will even grant that much of the modern Left and the increasingly insane mainstream has been brought about through the collective intellectual, organizational, and financial power of Jews. However, as the argument goes, Whites have allowed this to happen to themselves (the “suicide theory”) and furthermore are enthusiastically embracing and advancing through their own volition the very policies and ideologies that will lead to the destruction of White societies. If all the Jews were hypothetically rounded up in gas vans tomorrow, the anti-White virus is said to be so ingrained that their removal would not appreciably effect the reclamation of our own destiny. This argument fails to account for the vigorous policing of thought and political repression that is directly instigated and formulated by organized Jewish power which holds the preeminent position in the economic and political hierarchy of all Western states and – crucially – controls the mainstream media and world of entertainment.

Duke believes, along with Kevin MacDonald, that there can be no reversal of the current decline without explicitly identifying the overwhelming Jewish influence in the anti-White system that currently exists and has been strategically fostered to maximize Jewish advantage and bring about conditions where Jews feel secure. Duke’s YouTube videos relentlessly (detractors would say monomaniacally) attack Jewish deception, hypocrisy, and their collective efforts against White interests, robustly defining an enemy in the Schmittian sense, an essential preliminary for any political action. Of course, that enemy distinction was made long ago by Jews vis-à-vis Whites; unfortunately, it’s now late in the fourth quarter and Whites still don’t know whom they’re competing against.

If consciousness of Jewish identity is raised and an explicit ethnic link is made to the anti-White agenda, their power is significantly weakened and can eventually be broken. Tribal identification among Whites can be reawakened and reinforced by a conscious opposition to Jewish power. The zealous, true-believing Whites that totally embrace the Jewish program are relatively small and could hypothetically be readily neutralized once they are widely seen as traitorous collaborators. The much larger toadying cohort that acts out of self-interest and holds no particular ideology will probably be easily swayed by which way the wind blows, jumping ship when the time is auspicious.  A positive byproduct of this dynamic is that the identification of a set of anti-White beliefs directly with an obvious “Other” is a much more powerfully motivating psychological force for the promotion of racial awareness than an amorphous mass of people that simply hold anti-White beliefs. In short, according to Duke, without confronting explicitly Jewish group strategies in Western societies there can be no real fight for the future of Whites since they will always be beaten by the more cohesively organized “team”. Furthermore, history shows that they cannot be enlisted for our cause; they have been and will forever be opposed to our people and the maintenance of our own heritage. You must take them on.

With the rise of the Jewish-neocon-manufactured “War on Terror”, it has become difficult for many Whites, including WNs, to not see our primary enemy as the Muslim peoples, particularly for Europeans whose countries are being invaded through immigration from Muslim lands. This is why Duke’s embrace of the Palestinian cause and defense of Muslim peoples has become his most problematic position for many. He has been to Iran and met with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a man routinely characterized (and mistranslated) by the Jewish media as a genocidal mad man, a “new Hitler”. While Iran, or Iraq for that matter, might not be, nor ever have been, a beacon of Western liberty (and why should it be?) there is no shame in defending a state’s sovereignty against Zionist-led forces of dissolution which will only bring about regional chaos and invite blowback, as indeed, we are seeing now with Iraq and Syria.

Long Beach and Compton together? Now you know you in trouble!

Long Beach and Compton together? Now you know you in trouble!

In some WN circles, sympathy for the decades-long plight of the Palestinians in and of itself is enough to draw their derision. One commenter sums it up: “I’m not sure what to make of the Dukemeister these days. He doesn’t seem to advocate on behalf of white and European Americans anymore and has morphed into a race neutral human rights advocate. If his heart bleeds for anyone it seems to be the Palestinians and other muzzies judging by the copious amounts of internet ink he’s spilled writing about their plight.” But Whites are not heartless people and can’t help but be moved when they hear that Israel has bulldozed Palestinian homes again, dropped bombs on hospitals and schools, and shot children for sport; this feeling is not incompatible with a frank recognition of the difference between our peoples. The Palestinians and the West do have a common enemy, but recognizing that does not mean that we are the same or that their culture is on par with Western Civilization. Palestinians and many other Muslims have turned into an enemy as a result of the Jewish domination of US foreign policy, but they need not remain so indefinitely. There will always be the potential for conflict with Islamic lands that are so different from ours, but the current pitched conflict is being stoked for alien interests.

Aliens

I acknowledge that Duke’s position on this matter may be the toughest to swallow considering the ubiquitous anti-Islamic climate fostered by the Jewish media and now held by many Whites. However, the alternative is to simply add to the resounding anti-Islamic chorus which only has the effect (intended by our Israeli friends) of building popular support for a permanent occupation of the Mideast to fulfill the territorial ambitions of Greater Israel. Calls for reducing Muslim immigration to the West, as good as that sounds, tends to reduce the demographic question to the cultural and obscures the racial question, thereby doing little to combat the global migration of non-Whites to the West. Besides, a clever politician will always come forth to argue for the simple cultural assimilation of immigrants (“by the third generation they’ll be just like us!”) and voila – problem solved.

Another important reason for the dislike and hatred of Duke from Rightists is that “anti-Semitism” has acquired a veneer of low-class anti-intellectualism associated with blustering, prole-ish Neo-Nazi types. This impression is largely due to the results of the Second World War and has surely been cultivated by Jewish elites (some would argue that its kernel lies in an Anglo culture that long ago was Judaized through the intermarriage of elite families).

Tiberius -

Tiberius – “Anti-Semite”

However, a cursory look through Western history dispels this notion – many brilliant artists, statesman, writers, philosophers, and generals held “anti-Semitic” views. Nevertheless, White advocates like the genteel Jared Taylor of American Renaissance, and to a lesser degree Richard Spencer and Tom Sunic, minimize talk of Jews and actively promote the “suicide theory”. They find Duke’s increased focus on Jews and Zionism since the end of his political career distasteful. Truth be told, I sometimes find it a bit monotonous while nevertheless recognizing how essential it is. While Duke avoids glorifying Nazism, admittedly a nonstarter from most people, he does defend a revisionist viewpoint on the world wars, and considers them great and unnecessary tragedies for the West.

Edward I -

Edward I – “Anti-Semite”

Geoffrey Chaucer -

Geoffrey Chaucer – “Anti-Semite”

Voltaire -

Voltaire – “Anti-Semite”

Thomas Jefferson -

Thomas Jefferson – “Anti-Semite”

T.S. Eliot -

T.S. Eliot – “Anti-Semite”

Ezra Pound -

Ezra Pound – “Anti-Semite”

Wyndham Lewis -

Wyndham Lewis – “Anti-Semite”

Richard Spencer proclaimed on his podcast that Duke “hates them more than he loves us”. A provocative but important question: what’s wrong with hate? It’s part of human nature and essential for our survival. Hate differentiates from that which you love. Frankly, I don’t know of many straight, intelligent men that would buy into a movement whose leaders were simply bloviating about “loving your race”. Nevertheless, Duke’s exposure of Israel, Jews, and Zionism is delivered with a cool rationality that doesn’t sound quite as hateful as Abe Foxman wishes it did. Hate on, haters:

A personal anecdote about yours truly: I became educated on racialism after reading David Duke’s autobiography My Awakening. I got to that point by way of US foreign policy. I discovered that the Iraq War was essentially a Jewish operation, and David Duke, on his website and radio show, was one of the few outspoken commentators pointing at the real culprits. I ordered his book and it arrived in the mail, autographed. The chapters on race, historical revisionism, and Jews were things I had never considered before. From that point on, I immersed myself in literature that was not available at the local public library. For me, and I suspect for many White Nationalists, criminal international Zionism was their entrée into a racialized worldview. With Israel’s constant savagery, deception, pushiness, and arrogance, many more Whites are waking up to the vulgar lie that poor wittle Iswael is “our only democractic ally in the region”.

My Awakening was my awakening.

My Awakening was my awakening.

Duke is now 64 years old and his status as a “leader” among White Nationalists is certainly past its peak. The post-political career model of White activism he has been engaged in is populist in its nature, it appeals to Whites of all socioeconomic classes, and fits the definition of White Nationalism 2.0 – what we believe to be the future for White advocacy. Exposure of Zionism and Jews acts as a powerful gateway or stepping stone towards racial consciousness, while delineating our race’s most formidable foe. There are certainly numerous personal flaws that critics in our camp assail Duke for: it’s said that he’s a self-promoter, a womanizer, an egotist, a fraudster that has manipulated his donors and followers. Some of these may or may not be true and I don’t really care.

On the whole, when it comes to a principled stance in defending White interests, there is simply no other American who has reached and awakened as many people as he has. His message, from the Jewish viewpoint, is insidious because it reaches people on an emotional and rational level while not running afoul of any of our society’s norms (exactly the reason why many absolutists on the Right recoil from this seemingly liberal sensibility). Until a celebrity publicly converts to our cause and crusades for it, I don’t see another man having as great an impact as he had. The cultural atmosphere is far more anti-White now than when Duke was running in elections. The dirty tricks, Jewish terrorism, and outright censorship now seems to preclude another Duke coming along. I do remain hopeful, though, that the memes he has helped to seed, along with a growing awareness of the plight of Whites and their deadly relationship with Jews, will reach the right people and usher in change. To David Duke – excuse me, Dr. David Duke – I salute you.

Don Logan

Salute

Advertisements

40 comments on “In Defense of David Duke

  1. icareviews
    June 4, 2015

    Reblogged this on icareviews and commented:

    Don Logan discusses David Duke as a transitional figure straddling white nationalisms 1.0 and 2.0

    Liked by 1 person

  2. icareviews
    June 4, 2015

    I like David Duke a lot, though he does take the Sensitive Man routine a little too far at times, I think. You’re right, though, that his present body of anti-Zionist rhetoric is pretty much unassailable – or would be, if conservatives weren’t retarded or if liberals adhered to some kind of internal logic.

    Like

  3. Don Logan
    June 4, 2015

    He’s not going to work for everyone but he’s still probably more important for awakening White advocates than any other person in the “movement.” His populist style is effective, but I’ll grant that it has its flaws. However, I think he’s far more consistent ideologically than a lot of movement intellects that come across as theory dabblers.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Konstantinos Fasouletos
      June 4, 2015

      William Pierce was the person that “woke” me up I should say, not that I was completely asleep. I was racist even before that naturally because as Greeks we learned the hard way, having to deal with North Africans and Mongol Turks.

      Liked by 2 people

  4. thrasymachus33308
    June 4, 2015

    I hold to the “Puritan hypothesis” as Alfred Clark calls it. Yes, Jews are part of the problem, but they are not *the* problem. The Puritans self-consciously modeled themselves on the Jews to an extent, but the thing is a matter of culture so deep most whites can’t even see it.

    David Duke served some kind of purpose. TPTB love “controversy” and he played that to the hilt. Getting on TV gets your message across, they can’t avoid that, but how is it taken? People realize they agree with Duke, but for every one who can hold this in his mind comfortably there are ten who are horrified and commit themselves to anti-racism even more.

    I can’t say I really give a crap about the Palestinians; on some level a fight between two groups that would just as soon slit my throat as piss on me is fine. But advocating for the Palestinians is the *only* way to oppose Jews. Objectively the establishment of the State of Israel and its maintenance are wrong.

    The system has only gotten more powerful over Duke’s life and career, which doesn’t mean he wasn’t right to oppose it in any way he saw fit. But it’s time for something new.

    Like

    • icareviews
      June 4, 2015

      “But advocating for the Palestinians is the *only* way to oppose Jews.”

      Tell that to Ry Dawson and David Cole. Every Jewish lie is a chink the armor of their cultural-political supremacy.

      “But it’s time for something new.”

      I agree. My next post is thematically related to Don’s and will speculate on the character of the next-trending wave of pro-white advocacy.

      Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 5, 2015

      It wasn’t Puritans that lobbied to overturn immigration laws to allow the replacement of Americans by foreigners.

      It wasn’t the “Puritan Lobby” that hoodwinked America into wars in the Middle East.

      “Puritans” don’t run Hollywood and promote constant anti-White themes.

      In fact, “Puritans” essentially do not exist anymore and you could hardly claim that Puritans are overrepresented in the Ivy League or the Federal Reserve Board.

      If the Puritans had actually modeled themselves on the Jews, how come they are not ethnocentric like the Jews?

      Liked by 1 person

    • Don Logan
      June 6, 2015

      Blaming the “Puritans” is essentially a disingenuous ploy by sore Catholics still fighting the Reformation allied with Jews. Honestly , why not just blame Christianity, since the virus of universalism is inherent in it and an arguable predilection towards their religion’s ethnic founders? Couple that with our unmatched sense of guilt (naturally aided by Christianity), shame and strict morality and there you go. See Kevin MacDonald’s recent speech about early hunter-gatherer populations in northern Europe and their unique individualist psychology and sense of morality. The point is that you can go way back if you want to pin the blame on us. Putting it on the “Puritans” is just the revival of intra-Christian warfare and a dead-end.

      So we have a unique predisposition to be exploited by detrimental forces due to cultural and evolutionary reasons. OK – I buy that. But who originated the destructive culture and values we have today and who stands to benefit from them presumably? We have a Judaized culture due to a Jewish elite – there’s no getting around that fact. Yes – our former shameful elites bent over for them, but it was a long transformation process and the majority of the population can’t be held primarily responsible — the masses were slowly marinated in this poison over decades. We can blame a cohesive group of Semitic tribalists because the record speaks for itself. The advantages of blaming an outgroup I’ve already mentioned. Besides, it’s the truth.

      Like

  5. David Duke’s youthful indiscretions are forgivable. His ongoing appropriation of egalitarian anti-Racist rhetoric isn’t. Nor is his incessant Islamophilia, as evidenced by his eagerness to blame Islamic terrorism on anyone but Islamic terrorists and his refusal to criticize a single tenet of radical Islam or a single passage of the Koran.

    Egalitarianism and Islamism should be fought head on in a fundamental way — by attacking their core premises. Duke can’t or won’t do this because he has an overriding obsession with the Jews. He thinks that calling Israel “racist” (a Trotskyite term) will help convert more leftists to anti-Zionism. He thinks that stirring up Islamic rage will aid the jihad against Israel.

    If don’t really care if the the Israelis practice “apartheid” against the Palestinians. But I would agree that Israel doesn’t deserve to exist if it can’t be self-reliant (i.e., get off U.S. aid). Instead of making the argument on behalf of U.S. taxpayers, Duke goes off the rails with leftism, globalism, humanism, and pathological profusions of sympathy for culturally hostile Muslims. If that’s what’s necessary to destroy Zionism, then anti-Zionism isn’t the right cause.

    Like

    • Don Logan
      June 7, 2015

      The problem of reducing the question of Israeli “self-reliance” strictly to US aid is that it ignores Jewish power and its expression throughout society and the governments of Western countries, particularly the US. If economic aid and grants were ended, these countries would still be leveraged by the international Jewish community that resides in them to control our foreign policy and fight their wars, give them diplomatic support, and absolve them of any wrongdoing as they continue to steal land and harshly oppress the Palestinian Christian and Muslim population. Allowing hardline Zionism to dictate the future of the West essentially means, as far as foreign relations are concerned, perpetual war and occupation to fulfill their insane plans and ultimately irresolvable experiment in Jewish self-rule. This is one of the reasons Duke attacks them, while condemning, however minimally, Islamic terrorism. I heard him last week describe IS as the “devil incarnate” so he does not completely ignore the issue as you claim.

      If you’re not moved by the plight of the Palestinians, that’s fine. However, many Europeans and Americans, if made aware of the cruelties of the regime, would feel sympathy for them due to a sense of responsibility, since their own hijacked governments have been used to further the Zionist terror campaign. I don’t think the pursuit of White interests should be sacrificed for alien causes, but I do think the propaganda potential from it is significant. The standard Jewish narrative that they are the consummate victim in the history of the world is seriously undermined by exposure of how they behave when they have the whip hand. Since I consider criticizing organized Jewish power essential, smashing this well-crafted image is integral in fomenting a counter-reaction. Exposure of their crimes also shows Whites just how controlled their media is by Jews. The pathos evoked by images of suffering Palestinians can be powerful and help spur people to action. Duke situates White racial and cultural preservation alongside that of every other people’s “right”. We are a long way from the old notion of the vertical hierarchy of races and Duke simply makes his case according to the values and rhetoric of our age. He’s still for us, he just doesn’t say to hell with the rest. I will grant though, that Duke’s usage of “racist” and “racism” to describe Israel is slightly problematic.

      You obviously assume Islamism to be more of a threat to the West than the Zionist fifth-column in Western nations. While Muslims are undoubtedly a demographic threat in the West, it is because of the predominance of Jewish power that we can’t do anything about it and why they are here. Muslims don’t have any real power in Western societies. There will always be a potential for conflict with Islamic societies but the “hot war” we now have is only because of Jewish meddling in our foreign affairs. It’s a big region of the world and I don’t think their “hostility” is unmanageable; jihadis are a troublesome minority exacerbated by the usual gang. Besides, global opinion is squarely against Israel. Why stand by a sinking ship that’s repeatedly stabbed us in the back? Why not reach out to Syrians and Iranians as Duke does, as a White American, help lay the groundwork for the future when our countries can amicably relate to one another without the middleman stirring things up. It’s a mischaracterization to say he’s simply whipping up Muslims into a frenzy against Israel. Trust me, they already can’t stand the Jews, for good reason.

      Liked by 1 person

  6. clytemnestra57
    June 4, 2015

    I, too, think that Duke’s grudge against the Jews is making him get involved in what amounts to, whether or not you believe in the Bible, a thousands year old family squabble between two Semitic tribes.

    I have no interest whatsoever in the destruction of Israel – in fact, I would be happy if ALL Jews made Aliyah like Netanyahu claims to want. Nor do I have any interest in the establishment of a Palestine. In fact, the Palestinians have repeatedly rejected a two-state solution since Jump Street despite the fact by doing so, leads to more Israeli settlements being built on shrinking Palestinian territory.

    The Palestinians can’t seem to get the basic concept of stopping the bleeding by securing what territory they have before trying to gobble anymore. Instead, they choose to throw away the half of a loaf they have to take down the bakery.

    I think they are egged on in this meaningless macho stance by Muslims in other Arab nations who like to use the plight of the Palestinians to radicalize any Muslims who are inclined to secularism. All I know is that I get no sense of real love for the Palestinians by other John Q Citizen Arabs who see Palestinian refugees as troublemakers in their own countries even if their governments/clerics like to use them as a cause celebre.to annoy Israel.

    What bothers me about Duke, and he lives in Europe, so he cannot be excused for this stance, is that Jews and Muslims have no problem whatsoever getting along or working together against Christians, particularly Christian Europe! That is why my interest in them is only two-fold: staying out of the Semitic family squabble and keeping the Semites … ALL of them … out of our Japhetite territory.

    In the meantime, the USA still keeps up its disastrous policy of borrowing money from China et al to give money we don’t have to client countries like Israel and finance wars for them only to end up inviting Muslim refugees into the West. I can’t get into Duke’s pro-Palestinian position. I am, OTOH, in total agreement with Ron Paul that what happens in the Mideast should stay in the Mideast. Let Israel and her neighbors deal with each other as they see fit.

    We don’t need to get involved there. Not a single interest of ours is threatened there. We have oil and coal reserves of our own, not to mention the know-how to get completely energy independent. All we need is the will.

    Like

    • icareviews
      June 4, 2015

      “a thousands year old family squabble”

      Not really. It goes back to the thirties and forties when Zionist zealots and thugs invaded and terrorized and displaced hundreds of thousands of Arabs. Ever since then, the gradually expansive status quo of Judaic supremacy has been maintained at white people’s expense. The Palestinians, given this situation and subsequent developments – the USS Liberty incident, 9/11, wars in Iraq, etc. – are American whites’ natural allies. I wish the Arabs all success in outbreeding and eventually overwhelming this nest of parasites. Hell, if the Arabs aren’t allowed to live alone in their own country in any kind of peace, let’s have #OpenBordersForIsrael and let some Africans in on the fun while we’re at it. Israel desperately needs a diversity infusion ASAP.

      Liked by 1 person

      • clytemnestra57
        June 5, 2015

        The Hebrews or Jews or WTF they call themselves at any given time were always fighting and exterminating their proto-Arab neighbors in the region. Since they are all supposed to descendants of Shem, So it’s an extended family feud of at least four thousand years. And no, thanks to the Cohen gene, I don’t buy into the Khazar theory. Their mamas may be Ashkenaz Khazars, but their daddies are Jews.

        That’s what gets me with Palestinians rejecting the two-state solution. It would have been good for them, but bad for the Jews in the long run. Israel already has a substantial and fertile Israeli Arab population. If the Palestinian diaspora moved into a de-facto Palestine and bred like rabbits, then that would be pretty much it. I honestly think that all Palestinian resistance is not only ginned up by other Arab nations who have no real use for them other than as propaganda tools, but by Mossad itself. Because it would be harder to bomb a neighboring state than a bunch of tribes that seem to be squatting there.

        And I support open borders for Israel as long as the Jewish diaspora supports open borders for Japhethite countries as in what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander and those who set the standards must live by them, too, if only to set the right example of the rest of the world.

        That still doesn’t keep me from wanting our countries Semite-Free and to stay out of anymore Semitic family squabbles.

        Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 5, 2015

      Palestinians rejecting the two-state solution. It would have been good for them … Palestinian resistance is … ginned up by other Arab nations who have no real use for them other than as propaganda tools … squatting there.

      Yeah, that’s the Israeli line – Israel made a great offer and the stubborn Palestinians didn’t know what was good for them. Forget Israel, Arabs are worse they are only using the Palestinians as a cynical anti-semitic ploy. Palestinians are basically squatters, Palestinians are an invented people, Palestinians already have Jordan and all those other Arab nations, why don’t those squatters just die already?

      Frankly, taking Bibles stories as a template for “Jews” and how they behave is actually kind of anti-semitic I think. I prefer realpolitik and leave the religion out of it.

      As an American, I’m required to support Jewish Nationalism, I’m expected to not oppose any talk of Black Nationalism, Latino Nationalism, or any kind of non-White Nationalism. White Nationalism is out of bounds for even discussion. Also, as an American I can’t support Palestinian nationalism – Palestinians are the one exception to the non-White nationalism rule, because Israel.

      There’s obviously no logical consistency to this brand of argument and it seems pretty obvious whose interests are served.

      Two groups are singled out in this rhetoric – Whites and Palestinians. I’m fascinated by the level of effort expended to try to obscure this fact.

      Liked by 1 person

      • clytemnestra57
        June 5, 2015

        @Hipster Racist:

        “As an American, I’m required to support Jewish Nationalism, I’m expected to not oppose any talk of Black Nationalism, Latino Nationalism, or any kind of non-White Nationalism. White Nationalism is out of bounds for even discussion. Also, as an American I can’t support Palestinian nationalism – Palestinians are the one exception to the non-White nationalism rule, because Israel..

        You raise some good points.

        I base my opinions on things various Arabs I have worked with in the past have let slip about Palestinians. I concluded that they are trying to use them as shock troops against Israel much the way disingenuous “White” liberals try to use Blacks against Whites.

        “Frankly, taking Bibles stories as a template for “Jews” and how they behave is actually kind of anti-semitic I think. I prefer realpolitik and leave the religion out of it.”

        I respectfully disagree. The Bible is the perfect template for Jews. It clearly outlines how they think, how they operate, and what their goals are. We need to pay closer attention to the Bible.

        Some buzz words – “Cultural Mythos” i.e. Rome was built by the descendants of Troy whose leader was the son of Venus-Aphrodite and a Trojan mortal gave them casus belli to conquer and take over Greece. America’s own “Manifest Destiny” and “American Exceptionalism.”

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manifest_destiny
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_exceptionalism

        “Greater Israel’s” territorial ambitions go far beyond the 1967 borders or even Gaza. Does “from the banks of the Euphrates to the Rivers of the Nile” ring a bell? It’s carved on the walls of the Israeli Knesset.

        It is also in the Bible as something “God” allegedly promised to Abraham and his “descendants.” See Genesis 15:18:

        KJV: Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates:

        So you see Exceptionalism (chosen people), Cultural Mythos (G-d and Abraham were best buds!) and Manifest Destiny (G-d promised it to us) all wrapped up into one. I don’t think it’s “Anti-Semitic” to view the Bible as the perfect template for the Jews: It pretty much defines Israeli Nationalism and it is understood that all Jews are dual citizens of Israel.

        You may not take Genesis 15:18 that seriously, but believe me all the Arabs do, because Greater Israel’s immediate territorial ambitions cover practically the whole of the Arabian peninsula.

        Realpolitik demands that we look at the Bible as the Jewish template, because I think Greater Israel goes much further than that. We don’t have to believe that God actually promised the Jews the entire Arabian peninsula or anything else, for that matter, but we need to keep in mind that we have millions of American Christian Zionists that do. See Genesis 12:3:

        KJV: And I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.

        So give us whatever we want and “G-d” will be good to you … or else!

        Realpolitik demands that we study the Bible, because at present, these misguided people (who actually think of themselves as honest to God American patriots) are functioning as fifth columnists to what amounts to Global Israel’s worldwide territorial objectives. We need to figure out how to counter their belief that blessing Israel is equivalent to blessing the USA.

        Seeing how the USA has deteriorated since America became Israel’s bitch at Israel’s establishment, there is strong evidence to counter that, but if we don’t study the Bible to see what motivates Christian Zionist, we don’t know how to get these people to stop working for Israeli interests against our own.

        AFAIC, we have to be careful about embroiling ourselves too much with the Palestinians. They are a useful propaganda tool where the open borders debate waging throughout the Western Japhethite world is concerned, but little else.

        Thanks to Mindweapons’ influence, I am inclined to take a more insular Asiatic approach to the Mideast. It makes as little sense to deeply concern ourselves with defending Palestine’s borders as well as Israel’s borders when we have our own borders to worry about.

        There is a reason why the media and all the Neo-Cons at Faux News and in the Republiscum Party worked so hard to shut Ron Paul out of the process. The best way to stop Global Israel much less Greater Israel is to make sure that America stops expending blood and treasure to defend anyone’s borders other than her own.

        Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 5, 2015

      I base my opinions on things various Arabs I have worked with in the past have let slip about Palestinians. I concluded that they are trying to use them as shock troops against Israel much the way disingenuous ‘White’ liberals try to use Blacks against Whites.

      It’s rather astonishing that an Arab would say that, that an Arab would “let slip” an opinion that we know is a professionally written piece of pro-Israel Hasbara. It may be true, it may be false, but either way it’s an Official Talking Point of the Hasbara Handbook.

      For an Arab to “let slip” an opinion like that would be like a European who “let slip” “we don’t really care about South Africans, we just use that issue to make Black people look bad” or a White person who “let slip” “I really don’t care about White people I just hate niggers.”

      That doesn’t sound like what Arabs or White people say, but it does sound like what Jewish ADL/$PLC types say about White people and Arabs.

      we have to be careful about embroiling ourselves too much with the Palestinians.

      Why is that? What’s going to happen? I might piss off an anti-White, anti-Palestinian Jew? Whites who would have supported pro-white politicies are all of a sudden going to say, “well I was going to be pro-White, but then I read
      some guy saying that Israel shouldn’t murder a bunch of Palestinians children, so I decided to support mass immigration into white countries and only white countries.”

      What specifically might happen to us if we support the Palestinian cause against mass non-Palestinian immigration into their country?

      Liked by 1 person

      • clytemnestra57
        June 6, 2015

        @Hipster Racist:

        It’s rather astonishing that an Arab would say that, that an Arab would “let slip” an opinion that we know is a professionally written piece of pro-Israel Hasbara. It may be true, it may be false, but either way it’s an Official Talking Point of the Hasbara Handbook.

        All I know is that a Jordanian told me he couldn’t stand the Palestinian refugees in his country and that they are Palestinian until they get into trouble and then they are Jordanian. I have heard similar remarks from other Arabs. Could they all have been Hasbarat operatives? Maybe. Anything is possible, I guess.

        Why is that? What’s going to happen [if we embroil ourselves too much with Palestinians]?

        1) Oh, something along the lines of thousands of Syrian refugees being imported into the Whitest most Christian enclaves in the USA come to mind. It seems like every time, lately, all we have to do is look cross-eyed at a Muslim country, et voila, instant refugees in Maine, Michigan, Tennessee, Idaho!

        2) The same thing that happens to us anytime we are expected to “put our money where our mouths are.” Material aid, swarms of Muslim refugees, More expenditure of blood and treasure that we can ill afford. Invade the world, invite the world, in hoc to the world. We’ve already taken the Israeli Tour and got the tee shirt to show for it, do we really want to go there again with Palestine?

        … we support the Palestinian cause against mass non-Palestinian immigration into their country?

        Your identification with the Palestinians is causing some confusion, HR. Apples are not oranges. The White issue is all about a mass Non-White invasions into our countries by immigrant refugees.

        The Palestinians are trying to return to their country but Israel setting itself up as a racist, apartheid country with not only tight control over their own borders but access of Gaza.

        You were on the right track initially with your Open Borders for Israel theme. The BDS movement is also on the right track by viewing Israel as South Africa on steroids. But, in my opinion, shifting the focus beyond the either/or of Border Sovereignty for Everyone or Open Borders for Everyone premise of your previous post may help the Palestinians (to OUR countries – more on that later), but will not help us Being on anyone’s side but our own will only flood our countries with more Muslim refugees.

        Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 6, 2015

      Could they all have been Hasbarat operatives? Maybe. Anything is possible, I guess.

      No, they couldn’t. It’s just astonishing that you’ve talked to a bunch of Arabs and they all repeated a well known hasbara talking point. That does seem really unbelievable.

      I can’t imagine the kind of Arabs you have come across, but of course I’ve worked with quite a few Arabs and other Muslims since the late 1990s and I’ve never heard any Syrian, Lebanese, Jordanian, Egyptian, Saudi, or Pakistani ever repeat hasbara talking points like you have.

      Just an astonishing difference in our experiences I guess. The Arabs and Muslims you meet talk like Jewish hasbara while the ones I have met sound like exactly what you would expect from Muslims living in New York.

      Did you meet these Arabs in Tel Aviv or something?

      Your identification with the Palestinians is causing some confusion

      Well I would respectfully disagree, your identification with the Israelis is
      causing you to pull your punches where our anti-White enemies are weak. Jews in America are anti-White and they are anti-Palestinian. Pointing that out blunts their anti-White attacks and shows quite clearly the nature of their anti-White animus.

      In the apartheid regime of Jew bigotry in Zionist-occupied Palestine, the Jewish settler hate-groups use “price tag” attacks against the Palestinians – and the IDF – for actions that prevent the settlers from displacing more Palestinians.

      Our “price tag attacks” – 100% peaceful and rhetorical – impose costs on
      anti-White Zionists when they attack Whites. This is effective.

      I realize that a lot of White people wish that Jews weren’t anti-White – I am
      one of them. I wish Jews were not anti-White. I certainly did nothing to Jews to compel them to support the genocide of White people and force mass, race-replacing immigration on white countries like the do to Palestine.

      But that’s what Jews are doing. Instead of policing White advocates for suspicious sympathy with other victims of Zionist Jews, it might be better to go talk to Jews and get them to stop being anti-White.

      Like

      • clytemnestra57
        June 7, 2015

        @Hipster Racist:

        No, they couldn’t. It’s just astonishing that you’ve talked to a bunch of Arabs and they all repeated a well known hasbara talking point. That does seem really unbelievable.

        Sorry, I didn’t see this part earlier, or I would have responded. I assume the hasbara talking point you mentioned is that Arabs believe the Palestinians should have gone for a two-state solution an established their own country. They fully support the Palestinians not settling for anything less than the whole enchilada.

        The hasbara talking point was from me, based on my assumption that Palestinians had been offered and rejected a two-state solution as the media reported. Still feel that they put themselves at a disadvantage by not establishing a beachhead in order to be recognized as a sovereign nation which, in my opinion, would give them a better chance of stopping anymore Israeli settlements being built in their territory and give them the opportunity to bring back their own refugee populations from neighboring countries.

        As for where I met the Arabs who complained about the Palestinians, they were students at a university I used to work with. I’d help them write their papers, make their English understandable.. They all had Palestinian refugee populations in their countries and quite frankly, they couldn’t stand them.

        Evidently, the antics of Muslim refugees against the indigenous people of Europe is not restricted to Christian infidels but seems to be against the people of whatever hapless country that hosts them. Now who does that remind you of?

        Thanks to sharing the Abrahamic tradition with these two pain in the asses, not to mention the mistaken idea fostered by certain Protestant sects (sorry!) that we are the ten lost tribes of Israel, Europeans on both sides of the pond continue to get involved in one Semitic squabble after another in a way we have never done in Africa (except the Somali debacle which was never repeated).

        I fully support any BDS sentiment against the apartheid state of Israel or any other action that does not involve creating more refugees fleeing the Arabian peninsula to get to Europe. I believe in absolute sovereignty for all countries or open borders for all countries without exception. But that’s as far as my interest in the people of that area go. I want all foreign aid and any meddling into foreign affairs, i.e. “nation-building” to stop. We need to pursue any policies that returns all Semites back to the Arabian peninsula and keeps those remaining there where they can be quarantined like a virus.

        Like

  7. Hipster Racist
    June 4, 2015

    Duke is great, it’s excellent that he uses the standard “liberal” language about universal human rights. It’s great that he shows solidarity with the Palestinians. It’s excellent that he’s met with Iranians. His audience is international now and it’s not really the same audience as it was 20 years ago.

    Duke is also useful because he triggers people like LibertarianRealist. In fact, the whole Palestinian issue is so useful. Neo-conism is the shabbos goyim of our time and people who would otherwise be trying to stop the race-replacing immigration into white countries and only white countries instead fantasy role-play Crusaders vs. Moors.

    “Fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them over here.” The more time Jews spend defending the Nazi State of Israel, the apartheid regime of Jew bigotry in Zionist-occupied Palestine, the less moral clout the Jews have to push anti-white policies on us.

    Muslims don’t have power in America – Jews do. Muslims don’t form the core financial and organizational heart of the anti-White coalition – Jews do. If Europe banned Muslim immigration tomorrow at 8:00, Organized Jewry would file a suit by 9:00.

    Sure, it’s easy to be a neo-con and it’s acceptable to hate Muslims but if it was worthwhile they wouldn’t have made it easy.

    Liked by 1 person

    • clytemnestra57
      June 5, 2015

      I don’t necessarily hate the Muslims, but they are not our friends, Hipster Racist.

      The Jews and Muslims may be at each other’s throats in the Mideast, but they are thick as thieves in countries where the dominant population is composed of European Christians. Then they are the bestest buddies in the world.

      So, we have to be cautious where involving ourselves too much in the plight of Palestinians are concerned. Lest it be too much of a distraction from our own nationalist objectives OR:

      Often, the enemy of my enemy is simply my enemy’s enemy.

      So be careful to stay focused on our own objectives.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 5, 2015

        So, we have to be cautious where involving ourselves too much in the plight of Palestinians are concerned. Lest it be too much of a distraction from our own nationalist objectives

        That’s completely disingenuous. Why are you attempting to scare people off from
        the Palestinian issue? It’s not “distracting” – football and Facebook are distracting.

        Publicizing Israel’s crimes against the Palestinians – and us – is not “distracting.”

        Like

    • clytemnestra57
      June 6, 2015

      @Hipster Racist:

      Muslims don’t have power in America – Jews do. Muslims don’t form the core financial and organizational heart of the anti-White coalition – Jews do. If Europe banned Muslim immigration tomorrow at 8:00, Organized Jewry would file a suit by 9:00.>/i>

      Exactly. Now why is that?

      As I said earlier, in countries with dominant populations of European Christians, the Jews and Muslims are the bestest buddies in the world. Every time, the Europeans notice that their sons are getting beaten on the streets, their daughters are getting gang-raped by refugees, and their children are being groomed for prostitution, the rabbis and the imams get together and lecture Europeans about xenophobia and tolerance and scold them about “Islamophobia” and “Anti-Semitism.”

      Why are the Jews fighting the expulsion of Muslims from countries with dominant European Christian populations even though they put themselves at great risk by Jew-hating Muslims?

      Are you getting it yet, HR?

      Like

      • clytemnestra57
        June 6, 2015

        @Hipster Racist:

        That’s completely disingenuous. Why are you attempting to scare people off from the Palestinian issue?

        To be blunt, I suspect an informal agreement has been struck between the Jews and the Muslims for a territory swap. European territory for Arab territory, if you will.

        http://www.eutimes.net/2012/11/islamization-of-europe-a-good-thing-rabbi/

        If Muslims aren’t in the MIddle East, because they fled to Europe as refugees, then that makes Greater Israel all the easier to obtain. Eurabia IS the goal. Ideally a more Philo-Semitic Eurabia, but in the meantime, you have to break a lot of eggs to make an omelette!

        And look at the incentives! That wonderful welfare safety net to fray to the point of breaking! All those hot blonde infidels to rape!

        http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=2b2_1362800663

        So, what do we have here? All of European fighting men getting killed in the Mideast, leaving behind lots of European single women and girls for horny Arab refugees fleeing the violence in the Mideast.

        I hope you understand where I am coming from, now.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        June 6, 2015

        Right – and the issue of Palestine divides those “best buddies” – Jews and Muslims in White countries.

        Wouldn’t you rather them be fighting each other than united in fighting us?

        The Palestine issue hurts Jews, which is why there is opposition to it – because it is effective.

        Like

  8. Völkisch-Paganism
    June 5, 2015

    Die juden sind unser unlguck!

    Like

  9. Don Logan
    June 5, 2015

    The idea that Palestinians rejected Israeli offers because they’re too greedy and puffed up from Arab support is the false Jewish narrative. The “offers” were intended to be rejected because they were essentially unconditional surrenders that no sane people could accept. They never wanted a settlement – that’s not what Zionism is about. It’s about expanding territory for Jews. The idea that it’s simply a continuing religious feud that’s lasted thousands of years is facile and an argument used by Jews to perpetuate their ongoing criminal project. European Jews en masse ethnically cleansed the land after WW2 – that’s what’s important. Why should we care about Palestinians or , some of us, have an emotional reaction to it? Because Israel could not do what they do without the USG. It’s different from say African tribes fighting one another with no connection to us. And based on Zionist crimes and scheming against us, there can be rational justification to support the Jews. I’ll respond more in depth later and also address the “Puritan hypothesis” – which I think is rubbish by the way.

    Liked by 1 person

    • thebillyc
      June 6, 2015

      well said. my reading of kevin mcdonald and others in the anti-zionist sphere have led me to believe that the conspiracy of the illuminati has been real and is on-going: the published plans of the “wholly jewish” masonic banking fraternity are out there for all to read, going back to adam weishaupt. only the veil of the controlled narrative from print to television has kept the brain washed masses believing. the death of white europeans and making our civilization theirs (this latter part accomplished) is the goal of talmudic jews/ zionists. their infiltration of even white nationalism has us arguing over how many devils are dancing on the heads of their pins. stay focused.

      Like

  10. Don Logan
    June 5, 2015

    Meant to say – “NO rational justification to support the Jews”.

    Like

  11. Kay One
    June 5, 2015

    Reblogged this on Kent's space.

    Like

  12. clytemnestra57
    June 6, 2015

    @Hipster Racist:

    “The Palestine issue hurts Jews, which is why there is opposition to it – because it is effective.

    I don’t think there is that much REAL opposition to it, HR, and that’s what makes me nervous. This may be another case of Jews controlling the opposition by leading it. Jewish reaction to BDS is uncharacteristically muted for them in contrast to Holocaust Denial, for example. Only time will tell if this gets away from them.

    I have no problem whatsoever with using the Palestine issue as propaganda against open borders Jews. I have huge problems with making the mistake of lending Palestine material support the way we screwed the pooch with Israel.

    To me, the most effective approach was Ron Paul’s; putting an end to all foreign aid, because “we can’t afford it,” staying out of it and minding our own business, and not funding either side. The Jews did handstands to shut Ron Paul and his followers down.

    Yes, never stop using the Palestine Issue to underscore Jewish hypocrisy, BUT leave it at that. The most effective way to deal with this problem is to refuse to entangle ourselves in the Mideast whether it be financial or militarily.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      June 6, 2015

      Jewish reaction to BDS is uncharacteristically muted for them

      The reality is exactly that opposite. It is illegal – actually against federal law – for Americans to support the Arab boycott of Israel. Anti-White Zionist Jews have said over and over again that the BDS movement is “very dangerous” for them.

      Oh sure, the anti-White Jewish lobby may try to keep the Palestinian cause “muted” because exposure of the Palestinian cause hurts them – which gives us even more incentive to shout it from the rooftops.

      The most effective way to deal with this problem is to refuse to entangle ourselves in the Mideast whether it be financial or militarily.

      I’m not talking about federal politics, I’m talking about our rhetoric. We don’t have any choice in supporting Israel with foreign aid because we aren’t AIPAC. Sure, if some politician came along and suggested that we stop funding either Palestinians and Israelis – I’d support that. Sure.

      But I’m not the President or a Congressman. There’s no reason for us to allow anti-White Jews to support mass non-white immigration into our country while they ethnically cleanse the Palestinians.

      If they want to keep that “muted” if behooves us to be quite noisy about it.

      Make THEM justify their anti-White and anti-Palestinian hostility. The ball is in their court. I didn’t move to Israel and vote to allow massive non-Jewish immigration.

      Like

  13. Hipster Racist
    June 6, 2015

    As TOO has covered several times, many European Identitarian parties have supported Israel in the hopes that the European Jewish lobby will stop pushing mass race-replacing immigration. They hoped to find common ground with the European Jewish lobby in opposing Muslim immigration to Europe – which does harm Jews in Europe.

    How has the European Jewish lobby responded? By attacking every single European Identitarian party as “neo-Nazi” “Hitler” “anti-semite” and “Islamophobe.”

    A tiny, tiny fringe of the European Jewish lobby has paid some lip-service to the idea of restricting Muslim immigration *only* – while at the same time continuing to push for race-replacing immigration into Europe by non-Muslims.

    Hence, the “English Defense League” – all races and all peoples united against the Muslims and for Israel. England must be multi-racial and multi-cultural – just no Muslims.

    Israel must remain Jewish.

    So, has that Israeli friendly stance done the European Identitarian parties any good? Nope – not at all, in fact, quite the opposite.

    Now, considering that Muslim immigration into Europe is a real threat – but it’s not a threat to America – it makes even *less* sense for American ethno-nationalists to support Zionism. While supporting Palestinian nationalism helps us by exposing Jewish hypocrisy and their promotion of race-replacing immigration into white countries and only white countries. It also keeps Jews and Muslims fighting each other as opposed to them uniting to attack us.

    It’s a win-win for us.

    I’m more than willing to give David Duke the benefit of the doubt and suggest he knows exactly what he’s doing.

    Like

  14. sonofeurope
    June 6, 2015
    • Don Logan
      June 7, 2015

      Meanwhile, Mr. Republican thinks the IDF are the hardest, baddest dudes on the planet.

      Liked by 2 people

  15. sonofeurope
    June 7, 2015

    Reblogged this on murderbymedia2.

    Like

  16. rjamesd9
    June 7, 2015

    Thanks for the well written post Don.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Don Logan
      June 7, 2015

      My pleasure. Glad you liked it, keep coming back.

      Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on June 4, 2015 by .
%d bloggers like this: