Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

The Psychology Of White People: Egalitarian Individualism And Moral Universalism

“The Psychological Mechanism of White Dispossession” by Dr. Kevin Macdonald is required viewing for all AryanSkynet agents. Macdonald outlines the evolution of white people and our specific psychological traits; namely, egalitarian individualism, and ingroups and outgroups defined by the universalist morality we developed that make it possible for individualist whites to work collectively.

These traits are our strengths in certain situations and our weaknesses in others. But either way, we are what we are, and we have to work with our innate psychological nature.

Understanding our own nature is necessary for thriving and surviving into the future.

Kevin_Macdonald_CSULB

Advertisements

17 comments on “The Psychology Of White People: Egalitarian Individualism And Moral Universalism

  1. icareviews
    May 17, 2015

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  2. Hipster Racist
    May 17, 2015

    Reblogged this on Hipster Racist and commented:

    Really, this is required watching and it explains so much.

    Like

  3. Hipster Racist
    May 17, 2015

    Interestingly, when the “collective moral system” of a white tribe breaks down, everyone resorts back to radical individualism. Just think of America, and how when whites get sick of the two major parties, they seem to revert to libertarianism – completely rejecting any moral system and any collective interest. Americans likely have this the worst, because there are few organic tribes in America. In some ways, our detractors are correct that “white” itself is somewhat of a social construct. While in Europe, you still have tribes (Irish, Welsh, Danish, Breton, etc.) in America most of us historically have been a mix of British and German with a smattering of other European ancestries. Only in America is radical libertarianism ever a significant factor.

    This also explains why White Nationalists are always saying “we need a religion of our own based on our race” – because it’s nearly impossible for us to even think about acting collectively without that “moral in-group.”

    Compare and contrast to Jews. One of my favorite stories was an article about how Jewish fund-raising is done. A journalist posed as a wealthy Jewish businessman and called around to various Jewish non-profits offering to donate a large sum of money.

    One of the fundraisers quickly asked him if he was religious or not. He said “I’m secular, are you orthodox? If so, let me refer you to my colleague Rabbi Schlomo, he’s quite frum (religious.)”

    Can you imagine a white saying that? No way, the white would likely try to convert a secular white to religious or vice versa. It’s simply against our psychological nature to cooperate without that overarching “moral in-group.”

    Also consider the Junte Laws of the Scandinavian which enforces a sort of brute-force egalitarianism.

    Remember, these traits worked extremely well in certain conditions, but tend to fall apart when we are faced with non-whites – we tend to want to integrate the non-whites into our own “moral in-group.” Hence, Christianity is quite universalist, “neither Jew nor Greek we are all one in Christ Jesus.” Or how libertarians don’t even want borders and claim “racism is bad for business” and the like.

    It’s why left-wing whites are so anti-Zionist – Jews are not playing by the universalist white rules they promote for us.

    Our mission is to find a way to leverage our psychological traits in order to thrive in the current multi-racial environment as well as to come up with some sort of exclusively white “moral in-group” that will work in the future.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. clytemnestra57
    May 18, 2015

    @Hipster Racist:

    “In some ways, our detractors are correct that “white” itself is somewhat of a social construct. While in Europe, you still have tribes (Irish, Welsh, Danish, Breton, etc.) in America most of us historically have been a mix of British and German with a smattering of other European ancestries. Only in America is radical libertarianism ever a significant factor..

    Our detractors, as usual, are full of shit. I am probably coming from a different place than what I would call the American Heirloom White (i.e. WASP or Germanic Lutheran) represented by KMac or Peter Brimelow.

    I can understand why they lean towards pessimism, because right now, when Whites are not being smacked across their snouts for so-called “White Privilege,” our Marxist Media, no doubt taking its marching orders from Noel Ignatiev, is all about defining Whites by what they are NOT: People of Color. The latest offering being Non-Hispanic White.

    A casual visit to the comments section of any race-baiting articles from the Usual Suspects indicates that we are, in fact, in the embryonic stages of an Anglo-centric White tribalism in the USA. A visit to VDare (whose focus is on the unfettered [Non-White] immigration into this country shows authors ranging from Heirloom WASPS like Peter Brimelow and John Derbyshire to Roman Catholics like Patrick Buchanan and Virginia Abernathy, not to mention Greeks, Italians, and Jews What unifies them all is preserving Anglo American borders, language and cultural hegemony.

    Unfortunately, whether we like it or not, we are already on the fast track to a bilingual country much like Canada. In Canada, Non-French speaking Canadians are referred to as “Anglos.” We “Non-Hispanic Whites” need to take that bull by the horns and take that designation for ourselves. I may have come from Polish and French Suisse (Catholic) immigrants, but I was raised, fully immersed in the Anglo American history, culture, and language. I barely remember any high school French and I don’t know a lick of Polish. I’m Anglo. Call me an Anglo.

    I think it is a matter of time before “Non-Hispanic Whites” have to be designated as Anglo Whites. In fact, I think Aryan Skynet can get the ball moving right now by appropriating this term as our OWN designation. Since the designation of “Hispanic” was determined by the native language of its speaker, so we should designate the term “ANGLO” for ourselves. So I suggest that we push this meme for all it’s worth. We’re Anglos. It’s time to call ourselves that. Whites need to demand that the government census designation change us from a Non-entity to a White ethnicity based on language, just like the Hispanics.

    As far as religion goes, I think the biggest thing hobbling Whites is this subconscious belief and, I’m sorry, this is more of a Protestant thing than a Catholic or Eastern Orthodox belief, that we are actually Semities, i.e. the Lost Sheep of Israel rather than Japhethites.

    Yes, it is possible that some Israelites escaped the Assyrian swords and made it to Europe only to settle in and intermarry with the indigenous Japhethites there, but I don’t think they were that numerous. It’s time to let that shtick go and embrace our real identity. If we do so, all other aspects of religion will fall into place. JMHO.

    Liked by 3 people

    • ascomanni
      May 18, 2015

      Good point. “Anglo White” would be an improvement from “Non-Hispanic White” but I doubt it will ever fly. Even that small token towards an identity for us would frighten the Leftist power structure too much. I think we’re stuck with being “Non-Hispanics.” Or maybe we should start referring to ourselves as “Non-African Americans.” Just a thought 🙂

      Like

      • icareviews
        May 19, 2015

        “I think we’re stuck with being ‘Non-Hispanics.’ Or maybe we should start referring to ourselves as ‘Non-African Americans.'”

        I’d rather just be a “NON” than have to tack that garbage onto my self-identification.

        I’m still fine with plain old “white”; but I think that, whatever we choose, it shouldn’t be negatively defined as in “non-Hispanic white”.

        Liked by 1 person

    • icareviews
      May 19, 2015

      Interesting ideas, but I don’t know that I like “Anglo”. I grew up understanding this to be not a prefix (as used in “Anglo-American”), but a specifically Spanish term and a dismissive one akin to “gringo”. This comes across in the offered definitions at Urban Dictionary. One of the entries specifically states that the word is not pejorative, but I’m still not convinced of that:

      http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=anglo

      Like

      • clytemnestra57
        May 19, 2015

        @ascomanni:

        “Good point. “Anglo White” would be an improvement from “Non-Hispanic White” but I doubt it will ever fly. Even that small token towards an identity for us would frighten the Leftist power structure too much. I think we’re stuck with being “Non-Hispanics.” Or maybe we should start referring to ourselves as “Non-African Americans.” Just a thought.”

        If African-Americans worried that the power structure would be too frightened to let a name change, we’d all still be calling them “Niggers.” We don’t ask for permission. We don’t allow other people to label us, especially as what amounts to non-entities. We label ourselves and we insist that the others respect our brand. If “Non-Hispanic Whites” make a point of correcting the media and politely but firmly insisting that they be called Anglos, then the media will comply.

        @icareviews:

        “Interesting ideas, but I don’t know that I like “Anglo”. I grew up understanding this to be not a prefix (as used in “Anglo-American”), but a specifically Spanish term and a dismissive one akin to “gringo”. This comes across in the offered definitions at Urban Dictionary. One of the entries specifically states that the word is not pejorative, but I’m still not convinced of that.

        Point taken, but if “Non-Hispanic Whites” start branding themselves as Anglo-Americans and politely but very firmly insisting that the media label them as Anglo-American, then “Anglo” will ultimately be viewed as short-hand for Anglo-American much as “Latino” is viewed as shorthand for Latin-American.

        I still feel that we owe it to ourselves to establish our own brand by labeling ourselves or we continue to let the “others” diminish us as Non-People of Color. Non-Hispanic White … non-entities. To be stripped of identity is to be stripped of dignity. We need to assert our own identity.

        What I love about “Non-Hispanic Whites” labeling themselves as Anglo-Americans or “Anglos” is that it keeps the United States’ Heirloom British stock, but it also contains a big tent approach to all the other nationalities who came here and assimilated to the original Heirloom culture. It also strengthens America’s fraternal ties to British Canada. It discriminates against no religion. It’s a unifier, not a divider. It’s all about language.

        What I also like about Anglo-American or “Anglo” as shorthand for Anglo-American is that it is less pendantic and stuffy than David Duke’s term, “European-American.” It’s catchy, it’s easy to remember. It’s short, it’s simple, it’s a meme.
        Perfect way to capture the all-too-short attention span of any news cycle.

        Hope you reconsider.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        May 19, 2015

        Why not “Euro?” Short and sweet, like “Anglo” but it’s English, not Spanish. It’s all but a synonym for “white” and it’s inclusive of race and language and religion. It’s short for European just like “Anglo” is short for … “Anglican?”

        Or why not “Aryan?” I was under the impression that “Aryan” pretty much includes all Europeans but is somewhat exclusive of Jewish identity. “Aryan” seems somewhat more inclusive than “Nordic” which seems to imply only Scandinavian.

        In the meantime, I think “agreeing and amplifying” terms like “People of No Color” and “non-something something” makes a point.

        Like

  5. eyeslevel
    May 18, 2015

    White people are universalist. And they value truth. That’s exactly why The Mantra http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/the-white-mantra/ starts out “Africa for the Africans, Asia for the Asians, white countries for everybody?!” This points out that our enemies are only pretending to be universalist. They are only imposing diversity and multiculturalism in white countries. They are NOT universalist. They are, in fact, only targeting white people for genocide through force blending. It’s a dishonest genocidal scam.

    Actually, ALL of their weaponized terms are lies.

    Racist? Did you ever see an “anti-racist” complain about the Liberian Constitution https://twitter.com/eyeslevel/status/584014644957687808 or demand that rich Japan be flooded with non-Japanese for their horrendous colonial record? Anti-racist is always a code word for anti-white.

    Only pro-white speech is hate speech, not pro-black or pro-Jew. Hate speech is just any speech anti-whites hate. Anti-hate is code for anti-white.

    White supremacy? No one complains about Chinese supremacy in China. Anti-supremacy is code for anti-white.

    White privilege? No one complains about Japanese privilege in Japan. Anti-privilege is code for anti-white.

    Slavery? No one complains about Turks and Berbers enslaving millions of white people or uses it as an excuse to demand Turkey be flooded with millions and millions of non-Turks. Anti-slavery is code for anti-white.

    When you’re called a Nazi, anti-whites are claiming that any pro-white (not pro-black) act or utterance will immediately result in 6,000,000 Jews being gassed. It is invoked to muzzle pro-white speech. Anti-Nazi is code for anti-white.

    When you’re called a Klansman, anti-whites are claiming that any pro-white act or utterance will immediately result in 4,000 innocent blacks being lynched. Anti-KKK is code for anti-white.

    The Mantra is specifically designed for white people.

    Professor MacDonald goes into a great deal of speculation as to WHY white people are the way they are using evolutionary psychology to explain that white traits are an adaptation to a particular environment. Keep in mind:
    1. This is just speculation
    2. In fighting the propaganda war, while it is important to know how white people think, it doesn’t matter WHY they think that way, whether it is environmental adaptation or deliberate genetic manipulation by ancient aliens. Bringing it up the WHY is probably an unnecessary distraction.

    Japan is allowed to stay Japanese, blacks have 50+ countries they’re allowed to stay black, ALL white countries must be melting pots? How is that fairness or equality? Pointing that out uses white universalism to our advantage.

    Our enemies have used our traits against us. We must use them in our defense. Complaining about white traits accomplishes NOTHING.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. ascomanni
    May 18, 2015

    7:49 “.. taking over the top levels of society. This has been a top down revolution. This has not been a bottom up. People have not demanded, you haven’t had a demand from the people for more immigration. It’s a top down thing. And always has been.” It’s very frustrating when you realize that all of what we’re seeing, mass immigration, increase in lawlessness, violent crime, the crashing economy, the lowering of standards, the acceptance of perversion, the decay of the family, all of this has come about because of policies that people in general and especially white people did not ask for and still do not want. Very frustrating. It can not last. The dam will break.

    Liked by 3 people

  7. clytemnestra57
    May 20, 2015

    @Hipster Racist:

    I don’t see Whites adopting “Aryan,” for fear of setting of Hitler Holocaust Hysterics. I think it will start making a comeback a generation or two after the last alleged concentration camp shuffles off his mortal coil. Probably when our grandchildren get old.

    However, I think that will more be due to the fact that there will be a designation for Arab Americans and other Americans from the MIddle East who have become disenchanted with so-called “White Privilege.” We’ll probably also see Dot Indians became equally disenchanted and want to be a designated other as well as any Caucasoids from North Africa.

    So, I think Aryan will make a comeback when there is a designation for Levantines and Hindus and North Africans.

    In the meantime, I still like “Anglo” or “Anglo-American” White or, better yet, the proper definition of an English-speaking population in a country where two or more languages are spoken, “Anglophonic” to describe so-called “Non-Hispanic Whites.”

    It keeps a very inclusive Big Tent Approach. It retains its original Heirloom British American roots AND includes all the European immigrants who chose to learn English and adapt the Anglo-American culture. By acknowledging that America has become bilingual, it strengthens ties to Anglo-Canadians. It also contains a subtle reproof to any and all Americans who have chosen not to assimilate to Anglo culture and the politicians who pander to them.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hipster Racist
      May 20, 2015

      I see the point about using a linguistic term, Spanish is all but an official second language in America these days. “Press 1 for English.” Mestizos don’t seem to want to assimilate anyway, regardless of their skin color/racial admixture. Compare to, say, Slavics, which are all but indistinguishable from “heirloom” Americans now.

      Like

  8. Pingback: The Psychology Of White People: Egalitarian Individualism And Moral Universalism | marino1953

  9. Craig
    May 30, 2015

    Euro American it is then… That’s my European non- American vote.

    Copying the jew/black propaganda and replacing African American with European American would be fun.

    Apart from preaching to the choir Aryan may work better for international propaganda, when trying to tweak the east Asian, sub continent and Persian minds.

    Like

  10. thebillyc
    June 7, 2015

    “ANGLOS”-yes. even La Raza will buy into this, they can have the f-in deserts and californation. they will cull the negroids and the faggots for us, as well. easy to establish new borders with us in the north country. Anglo it shall be for me. One word, one language.

    Like

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: