Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

The Great Con (Part II)

Teaching Math in the 1950s:

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price. What is his profit?

Teaching Math in the 1960s:

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price, or $80. What is his profit?

Teaching Math in the 1970s:

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price, or $80. Did he make a profit?

Teaching Math in the 1980s:

A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is 4/5 of the price, or $80 and his profit is $20. Your assignment: Underline the number 20.

Teaching Math in the 1990s:

A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of the animals or the preservation of our woodlands. He does this so he can make a profit of $20. What do you think of this way of making a living? Topic for class participation after answering this question: How did the birds and squirrels feel as the logger cut down their homes? (There are no wrong answers, and if you feel like crying, that’s ok.)

Teaching Math in the 2000s:

If you have special needs or feel you need assistance because of race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, age, childhood memories, or criminal background, then don’t answer and the correct answer will be provided for you. There are no wrong answers.

Teaching Math in the 2015:

Un hachero vende una carrtada de maderpara 100 pesos. El costo del la producciones es 80 peso. Cuanto dinero ha hecho?

Republicans Want Their Votes

Republicans Want Their Votes

Pretty funny, huh? This is the sort of thing that your conservative family members might email to each other. The “dumbing down” of education, the inclusion of irrelevant political correctness in education; it’s a great set up for the punchline: these days, education means educating *their* children: non-Whites. Mestizos. In Spanish.

Viva La Raza, eh?

But that sort of “conservatism” has been rendered passe. Under the “New Conservatism” we’re not supposed to notice the Mestizo invasion, the replacement of our people’s language, English, and even the dumbing down and the political correctness get all brushed aside for the new kind of conservatism.

Let a grassroots conservative explain:

ALPHAMEL: Very soon all kids will be speaking Arabic and only studying the Qur’an. Math Question: There are 100 Infidels captured by ISIS Martyrs in the name of Allah. 50 of them convert to Islam. How many remain to be murdered? How many should be beheaded? How many burned alive? Answers in the Qur’an Book 2. Follow-Up Question: What will Obama say about Muslim Terrorism?

AryanSkynet understand the reality:

As of 2011, Hispanics accounted for 16.7% of the national population, or around 52 million people. The Hispanic growth rate over the April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2007 period was 28.7% – about four times the rate of the nation’s total population (at 7.2%). The growth rate from July 1, 2005 to July 1, 2006 alone was 3.4% – about three and a half times the rate of the nation’s total population (at 1.0%). Based on the 2010 census, Hispanics are now the largest minority group in 191 out of 366 metropolitan areas in the US. The projected Hispanic population of the United States for July 1, 2050 is 132.8 million people, or 30.2% of the nation’s total projected population on that date.

There are 2.595 million Muslim adherents across the country in 2010. Islamic populations are 0.6% of the US population per Fareed Zakaria quoting Pew Research Center, 2010.

Al Qaeda operative Adam Gadahn. Just kidding, his real name is Adam Pearlman and he's from California.

Al Qaeda operative Adam Gadahn. Just kidding, his real name is Adam Pearlman and he’s from California.

But one of the most common beliefs among conservatives is that the Obama administration is riddled with Muslim double-agents who belong to the Muslim Brotherhood. None of these conservatives have any idea what the Muslim brotherhood is (hint: it’s the Egyptian version of Evangelical Christian conservatives) but the name is scary enough.

And in many ways, you can hardly blame them. After all, conservatives had spent the last decade being told that Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, and sometimes lone Muslim sympathizers, did 9/11, the 2001 Anthrax Attacks, the Madrid train bombing, the London subway bombing, the Bali bombings, and were running the resistance forces fighting the US in Iraq and Afghanistan. Conservatives were told that these terrorists were walking among us, ready to strike at any moment, to blow up a mall, shoot into a crowd, or poison the water supplies. After the anthrax attacks, there were at least some conservatives who took the advice of the Department of Homeland Security and bought plastic sheets and duct taped their windows to avoid breathing the poison gas that Al Qaeda might drop from hijacked airplanes on unsuspecting Americans.

Al Qaeda terrorist Yousef al Khattab, played by Israeli actor Joseph Cohen

Al Qaeda terrorist Yousef al Khattab, played by Israeli actor Joseph Cohen

The smarter people – liberals – started doubting this narrative and the cultural touchstone for that was Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 911. This film was so controversial in 2004 that the Wall Street Journal had a running series of articles about the behind the scenes negotiations between Moore’s film company, the distributor, Warner Brothers, and the Bush administration; there was significant pressure on Warner Brothers to not distribute the film, or at the least bury it in out-of-the-way theaters.

Bush was actually holding hands with the King of Saudi Arabia.

Bush was actually holding hands with the King of Saudi Arabia.

The scene that the conservatives really hated was Moore’s interview with a counter-terrorist state officer in Oregon. The joke was that this single civilian policeman was in charge of watching for terrorists on a long stretch of Oregon coast line. If the conservatives were right, if Al Qaeda really was a globe spanning super terrorist group intent on and capable of mass terrorist attacks, then the Bush administration wasn’t really doing anything to protect “the Homeland” – and if there wasn’t a threat, if the Bush administration was hyping the threat – then, well, why didn’t the Bush administration stop 9/11?

Fahrenheit 911 punctured a hole right through the “War on Terror” of the Bush administration, and that’s why David Cole and his neo-conservative “Friends of Abe” made a movie mocking Michael Moore. He essentially ruined a good thing for them. There’s nothing really “conservative” in any cultural sense in “An American Carol,” it’s simply a piece making fun of people who didn’t support the wars the neo-conservatives were promoting.

Palestinians: An Invented People Being Replaced

Palestinians: An Invented People Being Replaced

An American Carol might be the swan song of “South Park Conservatism.” South Park Conservatism got its start with “Bigger, Longer, and Uncut,” a cartoon about Old Scratch himself sodomizing Official Enemy, Hitler the 13th, Saddam Hussein. South Park “lampooned” the liberals with lots of jokes about buttsex, homos, and poop. But the only real boundaries South Park pushed were those of good taste, and it didn’t skewer any really untouchable targets. In An American Carol, in fact, they mock Jimmy Carter for saying that “Israel is an apartheid state” while showing a happily multi-cultural, multi-racial, multi-gendered US military proudly serving their very non-apartheid country.

Well, if South Park Conservatives got their start in the late 90s with “Bigger, Longer and Uncut,” and its swan song was the stillborn “An American Carol,” was was the highlight? When did South Park Conservatism peak?

Whites: A Social Construct Being Replaced

Whites: A Social Construct Being Replaced


4 comments on “The Great Con (Part II)

  1. Hipster Racist
    April 16, 2015

    Reblogged this on Hipster Racist and commented:

    Well Cly I guess I owe you a beer. Hillary is running, I really thought the WSJ meant she was out.

    Bush vs. Clinton 2016. Ain’t democracy grand?


  2. clytemnestra57
    April 16, 2015

    LOL. Does it really matter who runs anymore? Have you noticed that the figurehead, I mean, president changes about every eight years, but the White House staff and all its advisors remains very, very kosher.

    Do you remember that Sarah Silverman skit about Disappearing White People on Saturday Night Live? There’s a segment where they talk about the Mexicans taking over and when the Mexican reaches out to take “power,” Silverman says, “Not yet, Mexicans!”

    (For some weird reason I could no longer find this skit on You Tube).

    Well, I think that 2016 elections are going telegraph a formal handing over of “power” to the Hispanics, because both the running mates are going to be Hispanic.

    My prediction is that the Republican ticket will end up being Presidential candidate “Yeb” Bush with Marco Rubio as his vice-presidential running mate. The latter may Ted Cruz to rope in the conservatives, but I doubt it.

    The Democrat ticket will end up being Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton (after some token opposition in the primary from Jim Webb or some other White male) with Julian Castro as her vice-presidential running mate.

    In 2024 the race will be between Marco Rubio and Julian Castro for the White House.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. icareviews
    April 17, 2015

    Reblogged this on icareviews and commented:

    The continuation of Hipster Racist’s must-read “Great Con” series.


Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: