Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

The Great Con (Part I)

A few weeks ago, I was at work and one of my gay coworkers was standing nearby. He suddenly farted very loudly and everyone heard it but pretended not to notice. If it were someone else who did it, you can bet somebody would have made a joke — but because the fart came from a gay man, likely with a weakened sphincter from all the butt pounding, they pretended it never happened.

So I got to thinking, what if someone created a gay character who was always farting, and his coworkers always pretended not to hear or smell it. If a film/TV show tried to explicitly explain why homosexuality is unnatural/unhealthy, they would be crucified. However, if they made the point by letting the viewer laugh and make his own conclusion by witnessing one of the unfortunate physiological effects of buggery, they would get away with it.

Just an example, but I think this is how the left can be mocked and then beaten.“Mintberry Crunch” – Taki’s Magazine (1)

David Cole, the Jewish “Holocaust Denier” (2) who remade himself into a “Hollywood conservative” has an article at Taki’s Magazine about the failure of “Hollywood’s largest, ostensibly underground cabal of conservatives: the Friends of Abe” [Lincoln, not Foxman, presumably] trying to remake Tinseltown into their conservative vision: “pro-America, pro-business, and pro-military.”

Their first attempt was the 2008 film, An American Carol. The synopsis of the film illustrates the nature of the “conservatism” the “Friends of Abe” are promoting. A Michael Moore stand-in misinterprets a JFK speech as being “anti-war,” so, in the style of “A Christmas Carol,” the Moore character is visited by three ghosts of the American past to show him the errors of his ways.


The New Face of Conservatism

First, the ghost of General George Patton shows the liberal filmmaker an alternative America where the War Between the States Civil War never happens, thus, slavery still exists. This echoes the standard issue conservative Republican line that “liberals are the real racists,” going so far as to suggest that being against war is pro-slavery, or at the least, sometimes war is good, at least when America (read: the Republican party) does it. After all, it was the Democrats who formed the “Solid South” and the Republican party who finally defeated the Slave Power (3).

Never mind the fact that the White South fought another hundred years to preserve racial segregation under the banner of the Democratic party, or that the Republicans only won the Southern vote when they turned to “racial dog-whistling” – a fact not only harped on by anti-Southern liberals, but also forthrightly acknowledged by legendary GOP pollster Lee Atwater. But slavery is bad, mm-kay, and liberals are the “real racists.”

Well, that’s one “conservative value” of Hollywood’s “Friends of Abe” – the destruction of the White nation of Dixie by force of industrial “total war” in the name of universal human rights and giving the vote to Negroes. Never mind Sherman burning Atlanta – the White Southerners rebuilt it. But don’t go getting any ideas – in 2015, Atlanta is all but a “no-go zone” for Whites – and for that matter, so are many other Southern cities such as Birmingham, Alabama. What great Republicans like Sherman couldn’t do, the St. Trayvons, the Gentle Giants like Michael Brown, and their patron Saint Doctor Reverend Martin Luther King Junior could.

But it’s important to keep this in context. The film was released in 2008, and the antagonist was not Bull Connor, it was a liberal Michael Moore stand-in, and the war the film is defending is not the War Of Northern Aggression Civil War, it’s the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the latter a war hated by most grassroots liberals and a solid faction of traditional conservatives, like Pat Buchanan, and even White Nationalists, like David Duke. While the war was promoted as a “liberation of the Iraqi people” to some degree, the main selling point was that the Iraqi regime had “Weapons of Mass Destruction” and were in cahoots with Osama Bin Laden and “Al Qaeda” and were likely involved in the September 11th, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington DC. (4)


White Liberals Not Taking the Muslim Threat Seriously Enough

The second ghostly visit in American Carol is that of George Washington himself, “who gives a passionate speech about God’s gift of freedom and the price many people pay for others to have it.”

It’s clearly the third ghost that lays out the agenda of the “Friends of Abe.” Country singer Trace Adkins (5) takes the Michael Moore character to a future Los Angeles, which has been (come on, who didn’t see this coming?) “completely taken over by radical Islamists. He is then taken to the ruins of his hometown in Michigan, which has been destroyed by a nuclear bomb planted by Al Qaeda.”

It is precisely this form of “conservatism” that has “Red State America” banning “sharia law”in Oklahoma – while looking the other way as America is swamped by non-White (and non-Muslim) immigrants – both legal and illegal. It doesn’t take too long to figure out whether or not immigration restriction would get a friendly welcome by the “Friends of Abe” – unless it’s Israel restricting immigration. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that “racism,” “White Nationalism” and “ethnic homogeneity” would be rejected by the “Friends of Abe” – except in Israel. (6)

At least Cole is honest about the attitude of his fellow Jews towards their White Christian “conservative friends” and why the group never tried to make Christian films:

Another reason: “faith-based films,” a fairly dependable genre, weren’t in play for Abe consideration. There were too many atheist libertarians and secular (okay, atheist) Jews in the mix, who privately viewed their cross-wearing and churchgoing fellow Abes as irrational Neanderthals. There was a truce between the pro-religion and anti-religion Abes, but that armistice only survived because no one ever put it to the test.

In this case, the Jewish hatred of Christians may be a blessing in disguise. As Cole’s list of “faith-based films” shows us, when Hollywood makes “Christian” movies, well-intentioned or not, they wind up being perhaps even more subversive than secular films could ever be. Three on Stein’s “conservative film” list, “Facing the Giants,” “The Blind Side,” and “Fireproof” are astonishingly subversive, anti-White and even anti-marriage.

Hollywood Promoting Christian Family Values

Hollywood Promoting Christian Family Values

But as “Mintberry Crunch” suggests above, maybe making anti-homosexual films will strike a blow for “conservatism?” What exemplifies “Hollyweird” more than their relentless promotion of homosexuality? Fortunately, a film/TV franchise, celebrated by conservatives and Republicans and lauded as great outreach to “youth,” has already shown that “farting faggot” jokes are quite popular.

Neo-cons have always had this rather strange way of playing, er, “both sides” of the “Homo Question.” On the one hand, to appeal to their socially conservative Christian base, they make a lot of noise about opposing “the Gay Agenda.” But they just can’t help using “homophobia” as a bludgeon against the unenlightened Muslims, who, after all, only take a break from buggering boys long enough to stone them. A piece about the recent controversies in Indiana illustrates it quite well. While making a goodhearted effort to defend Christians on religious liberty grounds, they just can’t help throwing in constant asides about how the Muslims are even worse to the queers. Why a comparison between Indiana and Iraq – a foreign nation halfway around the world full of non-Europeans, non-Christians, and non-Americans – would be even slightly relevant doesn’t seem to come up.

So what would a “conservative” film franchise full of “farting faggot” jokes look like? (7)

It’s obvious, isn’t it?

To Be Continued

(1) I read a wide variety of websites, from right wing sites like The Occidental Observer, to left wing sites like Common Dreams, to religious sites like First Things to hard core atheist forums on reddit. I even read Counter Currents, which is pretty much a pro-gay White Nationalist site. Yet the *only* time I ever read long, detailed descriptions of gay anal sex is on “alternative right” websites by “conservative” men “complaining” about homosexuals. The obvious question is, how do these conservative men know so much about the finer details of buggery? I suppose it’s best to not ask.

(2) “That he made respected documentaries on the Holocaust added intellectual cachet and Jewish support to Stein’s cocktail of politics, irreverence and rock and roll. … His real name can be revealed for the first time publicly – a close circle of confidants only found out the truth recently – as David Cole. And under that name he was once a reviled Holocaust revisionist who questioned the existence of Nazi gas chambers.”

(3) “It is the duty of Congress to prohibit in the territories those twin relics of barbarism, polygamy and slavery.” Republican Party Platform, Philadelpha, 1856. The Democrats were hoping that the Utah War against the Mormons would ease tensions over slavery, but it wasn’t to be. As soon as the Federal government defeated the Mormons, the Yankee Republicans moved on to defeat Dixie herself.

(4) Within hours of the September 11 attacks, [former CIA director and Jewish Institute of National Security Affairs neo-con] R. James Woolsey appeared on television suggesting Iraqi complicity. In September 2002, as Congress was deliberating authorizing President Bush to use force against Iraq, Woolsey told the Wall Street Journal that he believed that Iraq was also connected to the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building and the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993.,_Jr.#Iraq

(5) “The message is of course what I love, and I do think that maybe if everybody in New York were killed it would bring the country together.”

The water supply ain’t guarded,
There’s a valve and 45th and 9th.
Through which you could easily introduce hermoragic fever toxins
Into the municipal water supply,
Through an inland pumping substation.

— Bomb New York, The Onion

(6) “‘Note to refugees from South Sudan: Israel is for the white man.’ These were the astonishing words uttered by Israel’s interior minister Eli Yishai in an interview recently in which he outlined the Israeli government’s view of African migrants: ‘Most of the people [immigrants] coming here are Muslims who think the land doesn’t belong to us, to the white man’.”

He also added in the same interview which featured in the newspaper Maariv that “The infiltrators along with the Palestinians will quickly bring us to the end of the Zionist dream.”

(7) South Park’s creators got their start making a short film, “The Spirit of Xmas” where Jesus Christ fights with Santa Claus over the true meaning of Christmas. The boys that would become the South Park characters then summon a gay figure skater to settle the dispute and decide to celebrate Hanukkah because they will get more presents. Hey, if that isn’t a “conservative” message, what is?


23 comments on “The Great Con (Part I)

  1. Hipster Racist
    April 10, 2015

    Reblogged this on Hipster Racist and commented:

    I’ve noticed that among the “White Right,” “White Nationalists,” and “Alternative Right” you can categorize people by who they believe threatens their interests.

    Many people get into racialized politics because of Negro crime. In Europe, the demographic – and physical – threat of Muslim immigrants is paramount in many people’s minds, for legitimate reasons. In America, there is no Muslim threat to speak of, and American paranoia about Muslims is a product of war propaganda, specifically, Jewish war propaganda in the interests of the Zionist regime.

    For social conservatives, you have the “manosphere” types, which believe that “feminism” is the cause of all their problems. Then, you have a faction that are absolutely obsessed with homosexuals. They seem to seek them out, read a lot about them, and engage in detailed imaginings about their sexual practices.

    Who you think threatens your interests says a lot about you as a person. I pretty much side with the counter-Semites. Like Kevin MacDonald, I suggest that the “hostile elites” that promote immigration and anti-Whiteness are Jews, and Judaized Whites, like the “Christian” Zionists, and globalized capital.

    The rest – the leftists and the non-whites – are essentially powerless and just along for the ride.

    The Tribe, through it’s historical religious influence as well as its modern media regime, has been able to play “both sides” of every issue, and especially “the right” gets whip lash looking for enemies within their tribes, or outside of their tribes – but never squarely *at the Tribe*. This is a look at one particular way they do it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Don Logan
      April 13, 2015

      So HR – what got you into race and White nationalism? For me it was the Iraq War which I came to find out was a Jewish operation. I was wise to Jews before race in a more general sense. I then read David Duke’s autobiography and began to feel strongly about White interests and survival.


      • Hipster Racist
        April 13, 2015

        Well, Don Logan, glad you asked. I love nothing more than talking about myself.

        I’ve always been a “race realist” – growing up in Washington DC, around many Black people, it just comes naturally. But I was probably a mildly left-of-center liberal with a few hardcore right-wing tendencies just under the surface.

        After surviving 9/11, I became a hardcore Democratic party activist; I met many politicians, and donated a small fortune to the campaign of General Wes Clark (hey, I was young and naive, give me a break) and met him a few times.

        It became obvious to me that all the “multi-culturalism” was directed solely against White people, never any other group – and certainly never against Jews or Israel. It started to grate on my nerves that this extremely wealthy, powerful and connected ethnic group were treated as if they were some poor oppressed minority. I had assumed that the anti-Bush Democrats would be against the Iraq war, or would even try to indict Bush for something related to 9/11 (hey, give me a break, I was young and naive) – I soon found out that some of the most hard-core pro-war fanatics were, in fact, in the Democratic party. I also came to find out that the core of the anti-9/11 Truth movement were not, in fact, FOX News watching knuckle-draggers, but perfectly politically correct Kosher Zionists.

        I had read Kevin MacDonald before, and had remembered some David Duke stuff when I was a kid, so I just started reading more. At some point I found, where Hunter Wallace was talking about how Whites are the only people that actually care about the environment and endangered species. I had assumed (only somewhat wrongly) that most White Nationalists were drooling Nazitards and toothless Ku Klux Klansmen. When I discovered intelligent, thoughtful, cosmopolitan White Nationalists I essentially joined up. I found Kievsky over at OD, when he started his own blog I started posting there.

        When the “anti-fas” started harassing his family and he had to stop blogging, I registered AryanSkynet to hopefully keep that community going.

        Here’s the thing – probably half of the posters over at MWIR were pretty damn liberal, or at least with liberal backgrounds. It was never a “right wing” or “conservative” site. Many had discovered White Nationalism via the left. Sure, the other half were conservatives, some Christians, some right-wingers, even a few neo-Nazis probably.

        Thracy is a conservative Christian, that’s why we invited him to post here, I figured we should have a range of views. I had invited OperationWerewolf because he was a neo-pagan, but he started posting gay outrage porn and I think he got mad when we took it down. Icareviews and I had stumbled on each other’s blogs a while ago and I liked his movie reviews, so we invited him. Cly was one of the best commenters on MWIR so we brought her on board.

        As for me, personally, I think conservatives are stupid and I think FOX News, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh and their fans are worth nothing but mockery. For me, personally, I want to attract college educated, upper middle class, urban, sophisticated Whites – “hipsters” – to a pro-White movement. Other people can try to get the conservative FOX-tards on board; I have no patience with them.

        We’re all about a big tent.


  2. thrasymachus33308
    April 10, 2015

    Historically the attitude towards homosexuals was that they were harmless, and if they were private about what they did, and did not involve children, they could be left alone.

    The problem is that homosexuals don’t recognize the red lines that they are supposed to. A society that tolerates homosexuality will have pederasty. I think this is what Fred Phelps stumbled on in Topeka, although all the events around Gage Park aren’t clear.

    I suspect that homosexuals have been a big part of the system going way back. This is something no one ever talks about, but the things no one ever talks about are the most crucial. And organized perversion in general, I don’t think Jimmy Savile or Jeffrey Epstein invented it.


    • Hipster Racist
      April 10, 2015

      I can’t imagine anything more irrelevant than homosexuality when it comes to the problems facing Whites in America today.

      I also can’t think of a less effective way of “mocking and beating the left” than making Hollywood movies about homosexuals farting.

      In fact, I cannot think of anything gayer than conservatives posting long detailed descriptions of anal sex on the internet.

      It’s interesting, though. Fred Phelps made his money suing White businesses for “discrimination against Blacks” which won him an award from the NAACP. He then started a campaign of harassing White gays – and the US military – then his family adopted a non-White kid and use it to show how “not racist” they are.

      Also interesting is that John Derbyshire, who married a non-White woman and fathered non-White children, is now calling for third world, non-White radical Muslims to destroy America because of our barely-tolerant attitude toward homosexuals:

      If this is “conservatism” count me out.


  3. icareviews
    April 10, 2015

    Reblogged this on icareviews and commented:

    Hipster Racist kicks out the jams with an epic and highly recommended post covering the laughable impotence of the “conservative” presence in Hollywood.


  4. thordaddy
    April 11, 2015

    Homosexuality = pleasurable annihilation


    Homo = same = exact same = self…

    The affliction of the “white” male of the West is the desire for de facto homo lifestyle (no lady, no children, total annihilation).

    The radical homosexual’s maneuvering to imitate heterosexual marriage with children is just the type of smokescreen needed to obscure the above fact.

    A symbiotic regression.


    • eyeslevel
      April 11, 2015

      Thor, what do you say when someone calls you a racist in the presence of a white audience, either online or in person?


      • thordaddy
        April 11, 2015


        I ask them if they mean “white Supremacist?”

        The goal of course is to have the anti-white Supremacist define the personal metaphysics by which said anti-white Supremacist annihilates himself.

        The anti-white Supremacist wants to keep the “uncertain” “white” males in the psycholigical fold and define “racism” in strictly white/black relativism.

        The anti-white Supremacist simply DOES NOT KNOW of a genuine white Supremacy that is not contingent upon relations with the “black” collective and/or any “black” individual. In other words, the reality of the anti-white Supremacist is degenerately stunted.


      • Hipster Racist
        April 11, 2015


        As you can see, Trolldaddy starts blathering on about “white supremacy” and “default homos” and says whatever is *not* effective.

        When someone calls me a “racist” I say, “you’re just saying that because I’m white. Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”

        Because that is *effective*.


      • thordaddy
        April 12, 2015


        The problem with your advice is that it is just plain false.

        anti-racist DOES NOT EQUAL anti-white liberal/self-annihilator.


        As “we” have recently witnessed both a Japanese and a few Hispanics were accused of being “racist.” Obviously, the charge was not in being white, but in THINKING as a white Supremacist.


      • Hipster Racist
        April 12, 2015

        anti-racist DOES NOT EQUAL anti-white liberal/self-annihilator.

        Right, anti-racist equals anti-white – NOT “anti-white liberal/self-annihilator.” Your jargon is meaningless, you come across as some sort of religious fanatic.

        “Racist” simply means a white person.

        As “we” have recently witnessed both a Japanese and a few Hispanics were accused of being “racist.”

        This is immaterial, as Japanese and Hispanics are not systematically and officially denounced as “racist” and having “White Privilege” due to their race. The anti-racists have clearly said that “racism” equals prejudice plus privilege, and only white people have White Privilege – therefore only white people can be “racist.” That a handful of people may cry “racist” at other groups is meaningless; there is no “anti-Japanese racist” movement, nor is there any “anti-Hispanic racist” movement.

        Obviously, the charge was not in being white, but in THINKING as a white Supremacist.

        This makes no sense – no one accused the Japanese nor the Hipanics of “THINKING as a white Supremacist.” In fact, the idea is obviously absurd.

        Now, let’s discuss something relevant.

        Why are you here? If you were actually interested in making a point, you would a) realize that you are not communicating effectively, since no one here agrees with you or is being convinced by your posts, or can even make heads or tails of your gibberish, then b) you would rephrase what you are trying to say in order to communicate effectively to your audience.

        You are not doing that – quite the contrary, you simply resort the same talking points, over and over again, using the same ineffective language – as you have for at least THREE years now.

        This means you obviously are not interested in communicating ideas effectively.

        So why are you here?

        It’s obvious. You are trolling.

        There are billions of websites on the internet – why did you choose this one to troll?

        Go back to eradica.

        Unless the other two editorial board members overrule me, I’m trashing your posts from now on. You are wasting everyone’s time with argumentative nonsense.

        It’s free to make a wordpress blog. I’d suggest getting your own blog, writing out your ideas, and seeing if anyone is interested.


      • eyeslevel
        April 13, 2015

        Thor, have you EVER sparred (anti-whites don’t debate) with a competent anti-white? If so, I’d love to see the record of that exchange.

        You ask them if they mean white supremacist, so then they call you a racist and a white supremacist and a Nazi and a bigot and a xenophobe.

        How do you respond to the anti-white in the presence of a white audience? (If there’s no audience, it doesn’t matter what you say).


    • icareviews
      April 11, 2015

      I’d put it this way. European heterosexuals aren’t procreating, but the homosexuals through propaganda and proselytization are. From some interests’ perspective, there is clearly a connection between the anti-white elite’s promotion of arrested development in nerdy, introverted heterosexual males and its campaign for the popularization of homosexual relationships, both lifestyles being incapable of sustaining the white population at its present level – which, for that aforementioned elite, is the plan.


      • Hipster Racist
        April 11, 2015

        Don’t feed the troll. Thordaddy calls white men “default homos” and praises miscegenation that has an “imperial intent.”

        He’s part of the eradica crowd, that’s what they do – insult white men, insult white women, and troll other websites. They also don’t like it when people say bad things about their favorite nation, Israel.

        They are not, in any significant way, “pro-white.” That’s why I stopped writing for them.


      • Hipster Racist
        April 12, 2015

        There are many White Nationalists and Al Righters who would be perfectly cool with Miley Cyrus twerking on an inflated penis as long as there was a homogeneous White population. They want to deport non-whites and keep non-whites from entering, but inside the walls of Whitemanistan, let’s do our darndest to make Caligula blush! — Dan Poole

        See, this is the problem with “conservatives.” As long as Miley Cyrus marries young to a nice White man and has at least two White children, I really couldn’t care less if she wants to twerk on an inflated penis. As long as her hubbie is ok with it, fine by me.

        I tell you what is creepy – these “conservatives” who want to go around and check people’s drawers and bedrooms to make sure we aren’t enjoying ourselves too much.

        Sex is for reproduction AND pleasure. As long as the race is reproducing itself, then people really need to lay off worrying about what other people are doing with their genitals.

        Only Americans with their puritanical hang-ups about sex have this issue. In Europe, couples have “arrangements” about this sort of thing, and no one has a problem.

        Face it, conservatives are “betas” and are just upset that some men are more attractive to women than others. They want everyone to be “equal” apparently…


      • thordaddy
        April 12, 2015


        Lol…. That’s ^^^ pure, unadulterated nonsense.


  5. Hipster Racist
    April 11, 2015

    Liked by 1 person

    • Don Logan
      April 13, 2015

      So I presume that you were in Manhattan during 9/11 and relatively close to the WTC? Did you suspect from the beginning that pinning the blame on al-Qaeda was rubbish? Did that seem incredible to you or were you familiar with the concept of “false flags” already?

      I was also a liberal but fairly apolitical. The Iraq War changed that. I wasn’t introduced to 9/11 truth until a few years after the invasion. I’ve since changed many of my views and have become more “conservative,” although I detest most of that crowd. I’m more of a populist in truth and support a certain level of democracy, since it’s a natural element to Western societies, but I also believe modern mass democracy is ultimately corrosive.

      I was raised in a predominantly White area but always had a few minority friends. There was a considerable number of Blacks at my public school (fond of collectively jumping a single man in between classes), but they mostly kept to themselves. I was aware of the differences but the constant propaganda kept me from thinking about it too much. After college I worked with a large number of far-Left crusaders and their anti-White posturing and do-gooding zealotry caused a reaction in me. I’ve always been a bit of an outsider and critical of trendy signaling, so consequently I began to focus my criticism on the liberals I worked and lived with. I lived in Seattle at the time and these sorts of people were ubiquitous. What started as a defiant attitude eventually began to metamorphose into a new worldview that countered all their assumptions. David Duke’s book further brought home the reality of race.


  6. Pingback: Notable Headlines, Commentaries, and Youtubes 4/14/15 | The Daily Lemming

  7. Pingback: The Great Con (Part II) | Aryan Skynet

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: