Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

The Razers of Cain Part Two: Cain Slain by Brett Stevens and Resurrected by Rainer Chlodwig von Kook

Pederasty

Pederasty

[Read Part One of this essay here.]

The philo-Semitic “New Right” writer Brett Stevens offers a typical Cain-critical hack job in his neoreactionary rant “Serf’s Up!” at Amerika.org:

Fact is, modern man, you were so clever — you saw what the lord of the manse had, and you desired it, like Cain viewing Abel naked in the shower, resplendent in a natural glory you are in your Gollum-like ugliness not given, resplendent in a natural intelligence that in your Goliath-like stolidity you are not given — cheated! — like Esau viewing Jacob the future inheritor, like a dark-haired girl looking longingly on a blonde until longing turns to hate. You saw what those gifted by nature had and you determined you’d take it. You gathered all you knew and said, now we rule — and you did. You overthrew the Lord of the Manse, you married and impregnated his granddaughters, and now everything’s equal. Yet there’s a new Lord of the Manse and it’s not one person, but millions, hiding behind your credit cards and your house payments, parasitically wanting exactly what you do which is more money all of the time, and thus we all prey on each other, parasitic brothers locked in arms as we descend the whirlpool of our feedback loop rotting society for our profit — but surely it was worth it, because you’re free?

His attitude toward Cain, moreover, is of a piece with his dishonest and belittling attitude toward racialist politics. Zionist rodeo clown Stevens, who claims that “Hitler’s goals are near realization” and that “Jews are under attack and now are not protected by the liberal media establishment”, argues in his mean-spirited hit piece “Destroy White Nationalism”, that “white nationalism is an underconfident teenager” who “sulks in its bedroom, takes its toys and goes home, refuses to play nicely with the other kids, passive-aggressively throws spitwads at the African-American kids and takes candy from the Jewish kids (at least until it needs a doctor or lawyer).” What Stevens really believes, however, is that racialist identitarianism – nationalism writ large – violates the Jew-god’s insecure and incessant demands for humility and its enviously infantile prohibition of “idolatry”.

Stevens instead suggests that conservatives should “celebrate” the degenerate pederast, ethnomasochist, heroin addict, and murderer William S. Burroughs as one of their own. “Shoot the bitch and write a book. That’s what I did,” conservative Burroughs flippantly said of his 1951 murder of spouse Joan Vollmer. “When all the cards are counted,” Stevens writes, “Burroughs will be remembered as one of the good guys.” “That their children’s children’s children might be a different color is something very alarming to them,” this “good guy” literary celebrity said of white nationalists; “in short they are committed to the maintenance of the static image. The attempt to maintain a static image, even if it’s a good image, just won’t work.” Stevens, then, by his endorsement of Burroughs as a model conservative, must believe that miscegenation represents progress – the mule’s vibrant dynamism as opposed to the thoroughbred’s monotonous stasis in genealogical symmetry.

This same “conservative” wise man, Stevens, in tweeting a link to an Aryan Skynet post about Francis Parker Yockey, dismisses white nationalism as “ethnic Bolshevism” – the idea of the qualification being that historical, Jewish-financed-and-administered Bolshevism was somehow not ethnic? He characterizes white identitarianism as “fake nationalism” – as opposed to the “revitalized mainstream [i.e., kosher] conservatism” he extols – because of what he claims are white nationalism’s “emotional outbursts of racial hatred and paranoid anti-Semitism”, which, one assumes, include the telling of inconvenient facts about 9/11. Merely to speak the inviolable name of Larry Silverstein in vain and in lieu of its tetragrammaton is to murder Abel all over again in the Stevensian contribution to Talmudic theology.

Parody

Parody

“As is normal in a civilization that is collapsing from within, all of our words have become mis-defined for the political convenience of our rulers,” Stevens writes, and he would know this, considering his own services rendered to “our rulers” in perpetuating their historical distortions and misappropriating the concept of ethnonationalism as a label for psychotic maladjustment, paranoia, brutish behavior, and rabid calls for the resuscitation of some mythological program of genocide – a vast multiplication of the purportedly evil act of Cain.

As for Bolshevism, it is important to note that Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov, the embodiment of that Judaic plague, is remembered principally, in addition to his political destiny, murderousness, and personal dynamism, for his pragmatism – that and the fact that his party won. Lenin’s biographer Robert Service describes him as “an improviser” who “worked by instinct as well as by doctrine” – a man not willing to sacrifice a victory on ideological grounds. There are lessons in Lenin’s life for whites who would revolutionize their people. White activists might lack the deep New York pockets that Lenin had at his disposal, but can still benefit from a study of the Bolsheviks’ pragmatic approach to the tasks of strategic subversion. Allies change with political winds, as should political programs and propagandistic exigencies. Let whites dispense with Bolshevism’s more obviously Jewish aspects – the mass executions, contempt for tradition, and service to the Zionist banking complex – and embrace its flexibility and its pagan versatility.

Pragmatism

Pragmatism

The Babeuvist Conspiracy of the Equals failed, as did the Paris Commune; but this did not prevent Lenin and his supporters from learning from the mistakes of their less successful forebears within the revolutionary tradition. Racialists have their own rich heritage of failed experiments – and, to this extent, there is a grain of truth in Stevens’s nasty characterizations – but, like Marxism, white nationalism cannot allow itself to rigidify, stagnate, and become overly patterned and doctrinaire. When classical, economically fixated, and insurrection-oriented Marxism failed to produce the Western European revolutions its theorists and propagandists had prophesied, the neo-Marxists of the Frankfurt School reinvigorated the movement by changing its arsenal, image, and tactics, if not the ultimate target of its perpetual onslaught. While recognizing and honoring the triumphs of nationalisms past, the white nationalist of today must choose either to look to the future or else relegate his cause to nostalgia fetishism.

Nietzsche “would remind us, too,” Stevens writes in his essay “Morality”, “that it’s important not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Just because you don’t like herd morality doesn’t mean you get all Sandusky on some kids” – unless, of course, one is as staunch a reactionary as William S. Burroughs. Racial solidarity being as noble a cause and commitment as any, should whites jettison identity and group interest – and throw their babies out with the bathwater, as it were – only because the moral herd happens to have frowned upon some of their forebears’ fashion sense?

“The Indo-European peoples, before their conversion to Semitic ideas, never regarded their religion as an absolute truth. Rather they viewed it as a kind of family or caste heritage,” Alain de Benoist notes1. “The same [opposition] holds true for the biblical conception of the Law,” he elaborates. The Jewrisprudence of the Torah “distinguishes itself by its intangible nature” and “is, in its unvarying character, the always self-identical reflection of the will of a unique God, the sole master of time-eternity. In this sense,” Benoist concludes, “it is always radically opposed to the ever contingent law that paganism proposes.”2 “The enunciations of the true law,” Jean-Louis Tristani explains, “always have a point of reference with the actual conditions of their enunciation. This concept of the law results from another theology, Indo-European theology.”3

To be a pagan and European is to be true one’s roots while also remaining adaptable, versatile, able to see through the nets of good and evil and think and prepare in terms of contingency. It is, in other words, “ethnic Bolshevism” in the best possible sense of the terminology. Europeanized (which is to say, paganized) Christianity can claim to have served positive functions in history; but to, for instance, “turn the other cheek” and be “meek” as an ironclad policy of “humility”, indiscriminately and with disinterest in the presumed consequences, is, once one dispenses with the superimpositions of Jew-cult ideals and illusions, equivalent to acquiescing in the nonelective rectal expansion one can expect from the thrusts of one’s lustiest, most ruthless, and bloodthirstiest ethno-ideological adversaries. Even Christian Aryans, if they are to preserve what is valuable and necessary to their existence, must draw on the pagan within themselves and ethnically Bolshevize.

Rainer Chlodwig von Kook

Endnotes

  1. Benoist, Alain de. On Being a Pagan. Atlanta, GA: Ultra, 2004, p. 115.
  2. Ibid., p. 97.
  3. Ibid.
Advertisements

About icareviews

Propaganda Minister of #AryanSkynet

26 comments on “The Razers of Cain Part Two: Cain Slain by Brett Stevens and Resurrected by Rainer Chlodwig von Kook

  1. Pingback: The Razers of Cain Part One: Yahweh-Monopolism | Aryan Skynet

  2. icareviews
    February 12, 2015

    Reblogged this on icareviews.

    Like

  3. Hipster Racist
    February 12, 2015

    Everyone eventually writes a Brett Stevens article. It’s a reaction to the Costume Clowns and Jewish Trolls, everyone has the reaction at some point.

    What White Nationalist wants to “exterminate all the Jews and African-Americans?” Who?

    Oh, that’s right, Alex Linder and the VNN crowd. Yeah, but everyone assumes they are being paid to say that. Duh. He quotes Hunter Wallace in that article. Apparently, most of the WNs spent time on Alex Linder’s FBI/Troll forum, VNN. Even our very own MW. Not me, however, I wasn’t fooled ever by that particular honeypot.

    What did we learn from the Common Dreams articles? The most “anti-semitic” people on the internet are Jewish trolls. They are the ones that promote all the “anti-semitic conspiracy theories” as an attempt to muddy the waters.

    Of course. How could it be otherwise?

    other than the name, which tells you that white nationalists want an ethnostate of only white people, there is no further content to white nationalism. … Where do they stand on defense spending?

    Who gives a shit where they stand on defense spending? This guy is actually arguing for “mainstream conservatism” – as if the Military Industrial Complex gives two shits what he thinks about defense spending. This is the problem with “mainstream conservatives” – or liberals for that matter – and people who watch TV news and vote.

    It doesn’t matter. Democracy is an illusion. All it would take is for the TV to broadcast a TV show showing you as the Bad Guy, and your neighbors would happily beat you to death – and then brag about it the next day.

    The voting machines are rigged, true, but it doesn’t even matter – the minds of the people that are rigged.

    Sure, I agree with him that the “vanguardists” are idiots that do more harm then good – that what the ADL pays them for – but “mainstream conservatism?” Like, Rush Limbaugh and FOX News? He must be higher than William Burroughs. Conservatives are just the Liberals from 20 years ago.

    Like

    • icareviews
      February 12, 2015

      “All it would take is for the TV to broadcast a TV show showing you as the Bad Guy, and your neighbors would happily beat you to death – and then brag about it the next day.”

      I laughed at this. Sad but true.

      Like

  4. Hipster Racist
    February 12, 2015

    Reblogged this on Hipster Racist and commented:

    Kevin MacDonald often mentions that Europeans developed away from a clan based system (“pagan”) to a universalist, moral tribe (“Christian”) – but this seems to have happened pre-Christianity. Likely, due to the harsh winters which selected Europeans in a very different way than the peoples of the middle east were selected.

    There’s some pop anthropology idea about “Desert religions vs. Forest religions” that says something similar.

    Like

    • Peltast
      February 12, 2015

      The Late Roman Republic through the Imperial period was already ‘Universallistic’, many foreign slaves that were brought to Rome were later freed and given citzenship, by the late 2nd century the Roman Empire was already orientalized, the Severan Dynasty that came into power was mixed Roman and Punic/Syrian (Semitic), one of these Emperors even tried to impose a Semitic God named El Gabal (Heliogabalus in Latin) who was worshipped as a Black stone like the one in Meccah.

      Also the favorite ideology of the Roman ruling class was Stoicism who says to “Love the World was you love your City”.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. Hipster Racist
    February 12, 2015

    I remember when the Naked Lunch movie came out and all of a sudden Burroughs was cool again. I found him rather overrated. I’m more of a Charles Bukowski fan myself.

    “Women were meant to suffer; no wonder they asked for constant declarations of love.”

    Like

    • icareviews
      February 12, 2015

      Burroughs was capable of writing amusing little passages and vignettes, but the man simply wasn’t a novelist.

      Like

  6. thordaddy
    February 12, 2015

    When do “we” articulate exactly what is under attack and what all white males have been thoroughly brainwashed not to be?

    Brett Stevens rejects white Supremacy. Ergo, Brett Stevens is a “white” anti-white Supremacist. All this dribble is just as hoc personally-beneficial narrative creation.

    White Supremacy is the ONLY beef! And Brett Stevens has beef with white Supremacy, but he hardly alone. He is actually part and parcel of the super-mass.

    Like

  7. thordaddy
    February 12, 2015

    There is no liberal/conservative divide or liberal/centrist/conservative political landscape. There is a super-mass of anti-white Supremacists of various grievances and rationalizations and a sprinkle of genuine white Supremacists ducking and dodging all the throat-cutting going on between the super-mass always then justified as the liberation from white Supremacy..

    Like

    • icareviews
      February 12, 2015

      I do think there is legitimacy to some of the quarrels between people who call themselves liberals and people who call themselves conservatives. For the most part, however, I agree with you that the labels are increasingly worthless. I don’t use the term “supremacy” with reference to myself, though; even if it’s your honest conviction, it’s problematic branding and hard to sell to the still-sleeping Aryan giant.

      Like

  8. Craig
    February 12, 2015

    I liked this article very much… 🙂

    Like

  9. Craig
    February 12, 2015

    People call me a white nationalist, maybe I am… Yet as a matter of honour and justice, I would also like the Australian Aboriginals and Native American Indians to maintain their bloodlines and lands.

    Yet where is my voice?

    I have none.

    Even on an ethnic organisational level it’s required by LAW in our constitution, that we do not advocate politically for our own people.

    Liked by 1 person

    • thordaddy
      February 13, 2015

      “Australian Aboriginals” and “Native American Indians” ARE RADICAL LIBERAL CONSTRUCTS. Mere figments of imagination whose sole purpose is the annihilation of the singular experience. No individual lived life as an “Australian Aboriginal” or “Native American Indian.” These are but socially contrived collectives voluntarily confined to a manufactured “reality.” YOU don’t not use the label “supremacy” translate into “I do not declare myself a white Supremacist… I do not declare a belief in objective Supremacy.” Yes, yes… “We” understand that because YOU BELEIVE in justice and honour for an imaginary social construct YOU LABEL “Australian Aboriginals” and “Native American Indians.” The white Supremacist does not ultimately battle for mere physical territory and integrity UNLESS he’s primed his soul for spiritual war.

      If YOU accept the empirical existence of The Perfect Man AND you are white then YOU ARE a white Supremacist AND YOUR REJECTION of that label is only signifies an irrationality that then evidences an actual belief rejecting the empirical existence of The Perfect Man…

      And if one can reasonably draw that conclusion, i.e., recognize that one rejects the existence of The Perfect Man then “we” know we are dealing with a radical autonomist and “worshipper” of self-annihilation.

      White Supremacist or anti-white Supremacist or even worse, “white” anti-white Supremacist, but extremely diabocal, “white” anti-white Supremacist WHO HAS CLOAKED himself in “white supremacy.” <— This is the actual reality for all white males. This is the only spectrum that counts. Genuine white Supremacy is the canvas against which all radical liberals self-annihilate in all their chaotic "glory."

      Creating mythical collectives to be experienced through heart-tugging narratives does not even come close to speaking to the experience of even a single individual FORCEFULLY enveloped by such an externally imposed virtual reality.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        February 13, 2015

        A challenge for Thordaddy:

        One post without the terms “objective Supremacy” or “self-annihilation.”

        I’m taking odds now.

        Liked by 1 person

      • icareviews
        February 13, 2015

        “FORCEFULLY enveloped by such an externally imposed virtual reality.”

        You mean like this?

        Like

      • thordaddy
        February 14, 2015

        Hipster Racist = white Supremacist…

        Is there REALLY any dispute?

        I was ejected from the vicinity of Mr. Stevens’ soapbox for the very obvious reason of not being sufficiently liberal from a “bird’s” eye view… Lol!!!

        Like

  10. thordaddy
    February 13, 2015

    Hipster Racist…

    Think of the irony. The implications. How is “racist” disconnected from those terms? Those very terms are the only real substance in the white racialist’s struggle.

    Like

  11. thordaddy
    February 13, 2015

    The real observation is no matter how white Supremacy is served up — in true/false equations, in extravagant rhetoric, in memetic perpetuation, through symbol or act… It will be rejected by radical liberals who scream “genocide” while embracing self-annihilation. All these convos concerning WN 2.0 flows within this paradigm. And all the supposed players are radical liberals carefully cloaked. This should the high IQ white male DEFAULT assumption firmly ensconced in mind concerning all modern collectives.

    Like

  12. Pingback: Identity versus racism redux | Amerika

  13. weeedwacker
    February 14, 2015

    OK, so we’re supposed to look to WSB? Seriously?
    I can’t even take that junky homo seriously.
    What’s he even talking about?
    That shit’s whacked.

    Liked by 2 people

  14. Craig
    February 14, 2015

    I met this nuclear scientist many years ago on the net, a good mate. He had a computer program that use to troll the anti-whites for us. You know a highly advanced bot commenter. This was 8 years ago mind you.

    Saves a lot of time for a one man team trying to spread a meme every where. Though it had one weakness in it’s algorithm. I know it, and I’m impressed Hipster spotted it too.

    Nuclear guy had to sell out to the USA government, I guess he sold his bot program too. I was only aware of what happened when the laser uranium refinement hit the ABC 7:30 Report, years ago.

    Man did that spin me out…. He never told us about the laser stuff for obvious reasons.

    😀

    Liked by 1 person

  15. Pingback: Outside in - Involvements with reality » Blog Archive » Chaos Patch (#49)

  16. Pingback: ((( = )))

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on February 12, 2015 by .
%d bloggers like this: