Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch
When the Neo-cons were pushing to invade Iraq in 2004, France, Germany, and Russia were three great powers that opposed the war and refused to join the Bush administration’s “Coalition of the Willing.” The Neo-cons came up with a strategy for dealing with this opposition and it was summed up with the phrase: “Ignore Russia, Forgive Germany, Punish France.” This strategy was based on the specific relationships that the United States had with each power.
Russia was to be ignored. While the United States and Russia were nominally allies, Russia was not a member of NATO and the reality was Russia and the USA were opponents, enemies barely under the surface. The United States and Russia were to be at loggerheads anyway, and while Russia could create trouble for the United States, they were very limited in what they could do. Forgiving them wouldn’t gain their cooperation, but neither would punishing them help the situation. Thus, they were to be simply ignored.
Germany, not being a nuclear power and still militarily occupied by the United States, was to be forgiven for its impudence. Germany couldn’t do anything anyway; it could not prevent the Coalition powers from using their bases in Germany and flying over German airspace to invade the Middle East. They had no way to effectively extract costs from the Coalition, and it wasn’t worth antagonizing them by refusing to cooperate with them on other issues.
France, having its own independent nuclear arsenal and a long standing independent foreign policy, had to be punished. In some ways, France was the most formidable opponent of the Neo-cons; technically an ally, a member of NATO, but powerful and self-sufficient enough to not only go its own way, but to put up effective opposition to the invasion and extract costs from the United States in various ways, diplomatically and economically.
White Nationalists are in a somewhat analogous situation vis-a-vis other races, although with significantly different power relationships. Let’s propose a strategy: ignore Blacks, forgive Asians, punish Jews.
As far as Black people go, they generally speaking have few friends and little power; politically, economically, socially, and even organizationally. Pretty much every non-Black ethnic group has a low opinion of Blacks. Asians tend to avoid Blacks whenever possible and often refuse to even pay lip service to “anti-racism” when it comes to Blacks. Whites, due to half a century of propaganda, will usually pay lip service to integration and equality, and may vocally oppose open anti-Black sentiments, but other than a small minority, Whites tend to self-segregate whenever they can and generally ignore Blacks. While Jews have often used Blacks as a proxy to attack Whites, they self-segregate as much, if not more, than Whites, and in private, when the “goyim” aren’t listening, they will admit how they really feel about “schwartzes.”
So it makes sense to ignore Blacks. We will never “win them to our side” nor will punishing them likely help us. Like Russia, they have no real ability to oppose us unilaterally, and as they are already isolated, punishing them might actually be counterproductive. Why bother?
Asians – from the Chinese, to the Japanese, to the Indians, are in a very different position vis-a-vis Whites. In some ways hostile, in some ways neutral, in other ways friendly. Asians are not us, and will never be us, but they are not necessarily in an openly hostile confrontation with Whites. Many Asians seek to work with Whites, and most would rather live in a White neighborhood than a Black neighborhood. They are, and always will be, in competition with us. They will always seek to take advantage of Whites, and they will always network ethnically to take jobs and educational opportunities from Whites. They will always take the side of other Asians over Whites and they will always seek to immigrate to White countries and replace us. But the situation with Asians now is a sort of friendly arms-length neutrality. It’s usually not Asians complaining about “white privilege” and seeking to team up with other groups to attack Whites. As often as not, Asians see themselves as “almost White” and consider themselves above Blacks and Mestizos. If Whites were to adopt an openly hostile attitude toward Asians, that could drive them further into the anti-White coalition, which is what the anti-Whites want. In the short term, Asians could be allies on dismantling Affirmative Action policies which harm them as well as Whites. On the other hand, they will likely oppose immigration restriction.
Perhaps it’s best to forgive them, for now.
“Organized Jewry” are the core of the anti-White coalition. The fact that Jews are so intermixed with Whites makes it even hard to distinguish ourselves from them. Various pro-White groups have often tried to include Jews as Whites and welcome them into organizations such as American Renaissance and the Council of Conservative Citizens, only to find Jews simply working against us from the inside. Jewish participants at American Renaissance famously disrupted the conference to try to exclude David Duke. Jews like James Howard Kunstler pose as pro-White but seem to only sniff out “anti-semitism” in White groups, and are always trying to split Whites between philo-semites and anti-semites, the former to be co-opted and the latter to be isolated. How could it be otherwise?
Punishing anti-White Jewish groups like the ADL, the $PLC, and AIPAC can come from both the right and the left. Right-leaning conservatives can point to Jewish support for illegal – and legal – immigration into White countries and only White countries, and the hypocrisy of this while their community supports ethno-centrism in their country, Israel. Social conservatives can point to the anti-White and anti-Christian propaganda coming from Hollywood and Jewish subversion of cultural norms, such as their support for gay marriage, miscegenation, and the constant demonization of Southern Whites and the European diaspora generally.
From the left, Zionist Jews can be punished by opposing their genocide of the Palestinians, their constant war-mongering in the Middle East, and AIPAC’s disloyal manipulation of our political system for the benefit of a foreign regime. Leftists can point to Jewish malfeasance on Wall Street by financial predators like Bernie Madoff and corporate raiders.
Whites generally can point to the anti-White attitudes expressed by a great many Jews, Zionist or not, such as their fanatical ethno-centrism and their discrimination against Whites in such institutions as Ivy League universities.
“Ignore Blacks, Forgive Asians, Punish Jews” is a simplistic model, and more of a thought exercise than a practical plan of action. There are also two significant groups left out; Muslims and Latinos. Briefly, let’s cover these two groups.
Muslims, Arab or otherwise, are virtually a non-issue in America and most Americans are already very anti-Muslim. States like Oklahoma pass anti-sharia laws despite having virtually no Muslim population whatsoever. A significant percentage of Americans support wars against Muslim nations and America has, in fact, been in a constant state of war with the Muslim world since 9/11, if not earlier. It seems rather pointless to focus on them at all.
Then, there is perhaps the elephant in the living room; Latinos. The real demographic threat to White America comes from immigrants from Mexico and Central and South America. This perhaps requires a unique strategy. Other than opposing any non-White immigration altogether, perhaps there is some benefit to splitting the artificially constructed “Hispanic” identity. There are plenty of Mexicans and Central and South Americans that are White – people of Spanish, and thus European, ancestry. While America has always had an Anglo-German majority culture, and this should remain so, it may be possible to integrate “White Hispanics” while opposing race-replacing Mestizo immigration.
At the end of the day, it’s Whites against the world. Only “we” can be “us” and only Whites can look after White interests. Any alliances we have with other peoples are necessarily temporary, situational, and pragmatic. But we shouldn’t make enemies where we don’t have to, and it’s better to have friends than enemies. White people are a global minority, and all White countries – and only White countries – are being targeted for race-replacing immigration and “intermarriage” – polite words for genocide.
The anti-Whites are the problem, of whatever race. In America, the anti-White coalition is often at each other’s throats, and it’s better to have them fighting each other than have them unified in fighting us.