Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch
In the wake of the JFK assassination, William Buckley interviewed the author of “Rush to Judgment,” a book that barely hinted at a “wider conspiracy.” Buckley was trying to paint the JFK “conspiracy theorists” as left wingers who couldn’t accept that their hero had been assassinated by a Communist sympathizer and not a right winger, and in order to appear even-handed, he acknowledged that conservatives were susceptible to a similar mindset. He said, “there are many on the right that won’t be happy unless it is shown that the Kremlin literally pushed a button and Oswald sprung into action, as if by remote control.” For Buckley, himself a CIA asset, the official story – that Oswald, a Communist sympathizer, assassinated a liberal JFK all by himself – was not only true, but useful. It proved the dangers of the “global communist conspiracy,” and that the liberal Democrats who were “soft on communism” were in denial about a very real threat.
The right wing reaction to the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack echoes Buckley’s sentiment. So far, no one is suggesting that the attacks were an “organized conspiracy” on the part of “Al Qaeda” or the “Islamic State,” but instead, were done by “lone Al Qaeda sympathizers.” The purported assassins were not just sympathizers of the “global jihadi conspiracy” but in fact traveled to Syria and were trained by ISIS. To the right wing, the left-wing multiculturalists of Charlie Hebdo “had it coming” – they wholeheartedly supported mass immigration of Muslims into Europe and mocked as “conspiracy theorists” and “haters” any conservatives who pointed out the potential problems this might create.
The right wing is convinced that the elites – the governing class of Europe and the West – are somehow “naive” about the threat of Islam and mass immigration. According to this narrative, the elites really and truly believe that Muslims from the third world can coexist peacefully in a multicultural Europe, and the only thing preventing an outbreak of peace and harmony is the recalcitrant “racists” and “nativists” whose unhinged bigotry “isolates” otherwise peaceful Muslims from the community at large, fostering extremism.
That is one way to look at it. It’s the old saw, “never attribute to malice what can be explained by incompetence.” The liberal elites of the West are just naive, pie-in-the-sky ideologues just sure that with a bit more tolerance education even third world Muslims can be integrated peacefully into a new multi-cultural Europe.
Of course, there is another alternative. Perhaps the governing class of Europe knows full well that importing millions of third world Muslims into Europe is not going to result in multicultural harmony, but instead, social hostility and inevitable bouts of terrorism. Perhaps the elites of Europe are not, in fact, doe-eyed idealists, but instead extremely competent, intelligent, and ruthless managers of Global Empire and regular bouts of Muslim terrorism are, so to speak, a feature – not a bug.
Steve Sailer once described Western policy as “invade the world and invite the world.” For the last decade and a half, the United States and its NATO allies have been involved in a “Global War on Terror” against “Al Qaeda” – a purported world-wide Muslim conspiracy – and have invaded and/or bombed Muslim nations including Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, and Yemen, supported a coup in Egypt, with many factions still attempting to trigger a war against Iran.
To an objective observer, a non-Westerner and a non-Muslim – perhaps a Chinese – the idea that Westerners would be incensed at Muslims murdering French liberals after they themselves have spent fifteen years bombing, invading, are torturing one Muslim nation after another seems a bit, well, hypocritical. While NATO drone bombs wedding parties in Afghanistan and Yemen, Western newspapers publish blasphemy and mockery of Muslims and Islam. Muslim anger is hardly surprising.
But apparently we are supposed to believe that the people that run NATO, the Western governments, and the Western establishment in general are actually taken by surprise. We are supposed to believe that these highly competent people that run the World’s Only Superpower, a globe spanning Empire that includes military bases in 80% of the nations on earth, somehow just can’t wrap their heads around the idea that Muslims are different and importing foreigners into the West is a recipe for disaster. We are supposed to believe that the highly trained academics in the State Department and Western intelligence agencies are just bumbling fools, naive idealists who just want the Muslims to love us and give rights to women.
However, the idea that the elites know exactly what they are doing – that Muslim terrorism in Western nations is a feature, not a bug – an intended, not unintended consequence – is a “conspiracy theory” which means it is outside the permissible bounds of respectable opinion. In response to the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attack, the French Defense minister said that ISIS must be “destroyed” and the French are likely to increase their participation in the US and NATO wars in the Middle East, specifically, the war against Assad’s government in Syria – coincidentally, of course, the same Syrian government that ISIS is fighting.
In the years after 9/11, the Washington Post did a profile of a radical imam and his Mosque in suburban Virginia, driving distance from the CIA headquarters. Various purported “radical jihadis” had been members of this mosque and the imam was accused of “radicalizing” various American native and immigrant Muslims. The American elites threw up their hands; they could do nothing about it, they said, as the Constitutional freedoms of speech and religion made it impossible for the government to deport the imam and his terrorist jihadis. Of course, they had no problem sending Susan Lindauer, a blonde-haired, blue-eyed American born woman to military prison for a year under the PATRIOT Act, accused of “aiding terrorists” for writing letters to Congressmen warning of the attacks. The same government that had no problem dealing with a liberal White woman – cousin to George W. Bush’s Chief of Staff Andrew Card, no less – claimed helplessness in dealing with actual radical Muslim terrorists openly preaching jihad just spitting distance from the nation’s capital.
To echo Buckley, there are some that won’t be satisfied unless the CIA or Mossad literally “pushed a button” and the Charlie Hebdo assassins sprung into action, as if by remote control. In our post-9/11 internet culture, every event like this is second-guessed, each video run over with a fine toothed comb by those looking for any indication of video trickery, “crisis actors” or evidence of a “false flag.” But perhaps the “real conspiracy” here is that the Western powers have slaughtered hundreds of thousands of Muslims, while at the same time imported their relatives to the West and purposefully insulted them and their religion in the most obscene ways possible – then pretend to be surprised when they lash out.
In many ways, multiculturalism in the West is simply a mirror image of imperialism abroad. While Westerners are forced to respect sharia law and avoid offending Muslim sensibilities here – through the threat of violence either from Muslims themselves or the commissars of “hate speech” – over there, Muslims are forced to adopt to Western ways, to put up with NATO troops patrolling their streets and Western media seemingly designed to shock their sensibilities. While we are incensed when the British government turns a blind eye to Pakistanis sexually trafficking English girls in Rotherham, we turn a blind eye to Dyncorp sexually trafficking teenagers in the Balkans, Blackwater prostituting Iraqi girls for one US dollar, and the CIA sexually torturing Iraqi men, women, and children in secret prisons.
For a Global Empire to really work, every independent culture must be simultaneously smashed. Homogeneous nations represent the biggest obstacle to Global Empire. As good fences make good neighbors, without Muslim terrorism in the West, Westerners might lose their taste for invading and occupying Muslim nations. Therefore, peoples and cultures must be mixed, constantly at war with each other, lest peace – or at least benign neglect – breaks out.
Nous sommes tous Charlie maintenant.