Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

Khazar Shmazar

Khazaria map

Look Homeward, Ashkenazi.

A cherished rallying cry among the more gullible and intellectually undiscriminating white nationalists and anti-Zionists is the claim that the Jews of today are not the authentic descendants of the Israelites of the Bible. The Ashkenazim, this story goes, are actually Khazars, a Turkic people of Central Asia who are supposed to have been converted to Judaism by their king. Scholarly antecedents of the theory, which took off in the early twentieth century, can be found in nineteenth century works; but the idea that today’s Ashkenazim are actually these Khazars was popularized by anti-Zionist Jew and Christian convert Benjamin Freedman, whose 1961 speech on this subject has received tens of thousands of hits on YouTube.

Benjamin Freedman, Grand Old Man of Anti-Khazarism

Another authority frequently cited in defense of the Khazar theory is Arthur Koestler, whose 1976 book The Thirteenth Tribe attempts to furnish the legend with a respectable academic veneer. The trouble with this is that Koestler himself has discredited his scholarship by revealing his ulterior motive for writing the book. “Should this theory be confirmed, the term ‘anti-Semitism’ would become void of meaning,” Koestler admitted. Biographer Michael Scammell explains that Koestler “was convinced that if he could prove that the bulk of Eastern European Jews were descended from the Khazars, the racial basis for anti-Semitism would be removed and anti-Semitism itself could disappear.”

More recently, historian Shlomo Sand threw his hat into the ring with his book The Invention of the Jewish People, a work with a large anti-Zionist following. But “Sand is a fraud,” says The Elder of Ziyon, who notes that Sand “is not a historian of the [relevant] time period – his courses are on ‘French Intellectual History, Political History of the 20th Century, Cinema and History, Nation and Nationalism, History and Theory.’ His books prove that he is an ideologue more than a researcher.”

Nothin’ But a J Thang, Baybay, Two Low-Down Goyz, Yeah We Crayzay

Haaretz quotes skeptical Hebrew University professor Shaul Stampfer, a specialist in the area of Jewish demography, on Sand’s argumentation and motivation:

Stampfer, an expert in Jewish history, analyzed material from various fields, but found no reliable source for the claim that the Khazars – a multiethnic kingdom that included Iranians, Turks, Slavs and Circassians – converted to Judaism. “There never was a conversion by the Khazar king or the Khazar elite,” he said. “The conversion of the Khazars is a myth with no factual basis.”

As a historian, he said he was surprised to discover how hard it is “to prove that something didn’t happen. Until now, most of my research has been aimed at discovering or clarifying what did happen in the past … It’s a much more difficult challenge to prove that something didn’t happen than to prove it did.”

That’s because the proof is based primarily on the absence of evidence rather than its presence – like the fact that an event as unprecedented as an entire kingdom’s conversion to Judaism merited no mention in contemporaneous sources. “The silence of so many sources about the Khazars’ Judaism is very suspicious,” Stampfer said. “The Byzantines, the geonim [Jewish religious leaders of the sixth to eleventh centuries], the sages of Egypt – none of them have a word about the Jewish Khazars.”

[. . .]

Stampfer said his research had no political motives, though he recognizes that the topic is politically fraught. “It’s a really interesting historical question, but it has political implications,” he said. “As a historian, I’m naturally worried by the misuse of history. I think history should be removed from political discussions, but anyone who nevertheless wants to use history must at least present the correct facts. In this case, the facts are that the Khazars didn’t convert, the Jews aren’t descendants of the Khazars and the contemporary political problems between Israelis and Palestinians must be dealt with on the basis of current reality, not on the basis of a fictitious past.”

Kazar the Savage

The proof that the ancient Khazars were actually Aryan supermen!

West Hunter, the blog of anthropologist Henry Harpending and evolutionary biologist Gregory Cochran, authors of The Ten Thousand Year Explosion, reports the results of the most recent studies of Ashkenazi genetic makeup and finds an approximately half-European and half-Semitic mixture. Cochran relates that “the European admixture was mostly Italian, with some southern French” and notes in passing that “Koestler and Wexler are both wrong, by the way – the genetic evidence is quite clear.”

Revisionist historian Hoffman should know better.

Stampfer is correct to suggest that political disputes ought to be settled in the realm of current reality as opposed to some rarified sphere of convenient mythology; but Christian Identity zealots and other anti-Zionist partisans, who are determined to discredit Israel while also holding onto the Jew-cult in which they were indoctrinated as children, will no doubt continue to tout The Thirteenth Tribe despite whatever contradictory information comes their way. All of this, however, is just as unnecessary as it is self-defeating. For ammunition with which to delegitimize the Israeli regime, one need only open a typical issue of American Free Press, peruse the news stories featured at Mark Glenn’s Ugly Truth website, or follow Ry Dawson’s YouTube channel. No war was ever won by willfully imbibing disinformation.

Oy vey. Enough with the Khazars already.

RC von C


About icareviews

Author, Protocols of the Elders of Zanuck: Psychological Warfare and Filth at the Movies

12 comments on “Khazar Shmazar

  1. icareviews
    December 21, 2014

    Reblogged this on icareviews.


  2. treblinkasteamchamber
    December 21, 2014

    Have any of the unwitting believers in this “theory” ever even looked at a pure Turkic person and an Ashkenazi Jew?

    Here is the reason for this disinformation:

    If Ashkenazim are descended from Khazars, then Ashkenazim are genetically unrelated to Mizrahim and Sephardim. Why then, do all these groups act like nation-wrecking vermin? It can’t be heredity, so it must be solely the Jewish religion. What then is the “solution” to the Jewish problem? Roll out the holy water and get ready to party like its 1492, I’m sure it will work this time!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. vikingbitch
    December 22, 2014

    Interesting. I am new to WN, but I have always thought most Jews were a pain in the arce before I got into WN, National Socialism etc.

    I won’t pretend to know the roots of Jews, Judaism, Khazars whatever. To me, Jews are like porn, I know it when I see it.


  4. weeedwacker
    December 22, 2014

    Reblogged this on mrweedwacker.


  5. sonofeurope
    December 22, 2014

    Reblogged this on murderbymedia2.


  6. rollingwriter
    December 22, 2014

    Reblogged this on murderbymedia.


  7. Hipster Racist
    December 22, 2014

    Reblogged this on Hipster Racist and commented:

    This is only important to people who think that white people need some sort of historical connection to the Bible to be allowed to exist in the future.

    As an intellectual exercise, I find the theories of Anatoly Fomenko to be interesting. Assume his theories are true, then figure out – what difference would it make?

    OK, so Jews are actually a Turkish people from Khazaria … so what? OK, British Israelism and Christian Identity are historically plausible … so what? OK, Fomenko is right that Herodotus and Seutonious are largely mythological … so what? Most of history before the middle ages is likely inaccurate. So what?

    What has changed? What difference does it make in 2015?

    There are some people that have a need to “fix the past” and others that have a need to “create the future.” Which group is likely to do something actually useful?


    • icareviews
      December 23, 2014

      I don’t personally think it matters where the Jews originated, which ethnicity settled the American continent first, and so forth; but I do think accuracy in history matters and I wanted to write about this “Khazar” business because I see so many white nationalists and quasi-scholars like Michael Hoffman damaging their credibility by repeating this tripe. Jews and social justice warriors must laugh their tuchuses off when they see stuff like that video with the Jews explained away as revengeful Neanderthal Khazars.


      • Hipster Racist
        December 23, 2014

        I’m agreeing with you – it just doesn’t matter where Jews came from. The Christian Identity nuts that post on the Daily Stormer are nothing but a big fat distraction. Really, even anti-Zionism is a huge distraction – the problem is the Jewish lobby in America and Europe, not the existence of the Zionist entity in Palestine. If it wasn’t for diaspora Jews, Israel/Palestine would be as irrelevant to us as is China/Tibet or Kashmir/India/Pakistan.

        You’re right, the only reason these people care about the “true Israelites” is because of their rather fringe interpretation of Christianity. (Traditional Christianity, Orthodox, Catholic, or Protestant, does not hinge on who the “true Jews” were.)

        In fact, Jews themselves are really only an issue because of their hostility to European interests. What is relevant is that Jews – and other anti-white groups – are pushing race replacement and anti-European sentiment.

        I’m not the first to express this sentiment – thracy was right in his previous article here, the most important conflicts are those between White groups. It’s the White traitors – the White globalists – the White philo-semites – they are the real problem. If it wasn’t for them, dealing with hostile Jews and other hostile non-Whites would be pretty straightforward.

        Notice a certain blogger’s reaction to my Espionage Model article – for that blogger, using racial epithets like “gook” and self-expression are more important than actual effectiveness – and the same goes for these people obsessed with proving that Europeans are the “true Israelites” – it just doesn’t matter.

        It doesn’t matter that Blacks tend to have a lower IQ than Asians – even if Whites were the dumbest people on the planet, we’re still White, and we still have to work for our interests. So all that IQ/human bio-diversity stuff is only relevant insofar as it is practical for derailing anti-white sentiment.

        One thing I have learned over the last few years, there are quite a number of people – seemingly a lot of Catholics – that are far more anti-Jew than they are pro-White – just like there are a lot of people that are far more anti-Black than they are pro-White.

        I’m pretty much convinced that Bob Whitaker’s “Mantra” stuff is the most important and effective thing we can support right now.

        Liked by 1 person

    • eyeslevel
      December 23, 2014

      Most of the things that white nationalists spend most of their time on fall into the “So what?” category. They may be true, but they don’t help white people get a homeland or save white people from extinction.

      We’re in a war. It’s a propaganda war. The battlefield is the human mind. After decades of psychological warfare, most white people have been demoralized into accepting their own genocide and job one is deprogramming them.

      I call the people who claim to be pro-white yet refuse to fight the propaganda war “Anti-Mantra Pro-Whites” (AMPW’s). If you analogize what they spend most of their time, effort, money, thought on to a shooting war, they look ridiculous. They make me feel like The Exasperated General.

      “Shooting back” in a propaganda war mean destroying your enemies’ terminology and narratives. They throw a “racist” at you, you lob an “anti-racist is a code word for anti-white” at them. What if a soldier refused to shoot at the enemy? It might look something like this:


  8. clytemnestra57
    December 23, 2014

    I always thought that the Jews of Europe were the “long-lost” Israelites, because the evidence seems to fit the scenario. The males are all closer related to the Jewish males around the world than the men in the local area. The females not so much.

    If Jews colonized parts of Khazaria, why didn’t they bring their wives and children with them, like they did everywhere else unless the men lost a huge war and their families were killed or shipped off into slavery, leaving the stragglers as widowers. Makes sense that they would then have to marry the local women of whatever area they ultimately ended up in.

    If you look at Ashkenazi Jews, they look a lot like the Sephardim but somewhat lighter just like the Sephardim look like the Mizrahim but somewhat lighter. My thoughts are that the Mizrahim are the “original” Jews or Hebrews or the most pure-blooded. The Sephardim to a lesser extent probably married some Iberians. The Askenazim had to mix out more with the Turko-Slavic population.

    I never bought into the idea that the so-called “long-lost” Israelites would lose all memory of who they are. More likely, they laid low as Crypto-Chosen until they felt it was safe to come out just like their cousins have historically done.

    I don’t understand the appeal of Christian “Identity” or British Israelism to any White Nationalists. In fact, I feel these ideologies are dangerously counterproductive to White people in general.

    First, it stems from confusion over what was Jesus Christ’s mission. During His time on earth, Jesus kept saying his mission was to minister to “the lost sheep of” Israel. However, after He was crucified, rose from the dead, and ascended into Heaven, Jesus told Peter in a dream that he was to minister to Gentiles. According to Saul of Tarsus AKA St. Paul, Jesus gave him a mission to the Gentiles.

    The obvious conclusion was that God the Father kept the REAL mission hidden from the mind of Jesus while He was on Earth which is Satan’s dominion. In the New Testament, there is a passage that said if the Prince of this World (Satan) knew what God’s real plan was, he would have never permitted Jesus to be executed. IOW Christ’s real mission was to fulfill God’s promise of a Redeemer to Adam and Eve, the father and mother of all mankind.

    And all these crucified gods that Atheists like to bring up as “proof” that Jesus never really existed indicate to me some sort of divine revelation or reminders of the original promise that was ultimately fulfilled through Him.

    It leads to dangerous extremes between Anti-Semitism following the inevitable betrayal by Jews putting their own interests before the host populations and a fawning Philo-Semitism, i.e. getting involved in their conflicts with their Arab cousins.

    Most importantly, it plays into the dubious “proposition” nations theme that Jews have put into effect in countries across the West, because if White people are all actually long-lost Israelites, we are Semites who originated in the Middle East which then makes all European populations “nations of immigrants.”

    It runs completely counter to any indigenous Indo-European claim to the continent of Europe itself by White Nationalists. It also runs completely counter to the truth. Ham (whose name means burnt) is the father of the Afro-Asiatic races. Shem (whose name, interestingly enough means “the source”) was the father of the Semitic race.

    In Islam, there is an interesting side story to the “curse of Ham” and explains why every conceivable blessing imaginable was heaped on Japheth OVER THE OTHERS! See Genesis 9:26:

    He also said, “Blessed be the LORD, The God of Shem; And let Canaan be his servant. 27″May God enlarge Japheth, And let him dwell in the tents of Shem; And let Canaan be his servant.”

    The Islamic tale relates how Noah found out about Ham’s antics. It was from Shem. Japheth, it seems, helped Shem cover Noah and then discreetly went on about his own business rather than rat Ham out to Noah. But Shem couldn’t wait to tell Noah who was understandably mortified.

    So Noah gives Shem a god who is blessed and whose blessings then fall on Japheth. DATGoY – Dark And Terrible God of irony – strikes again.

    A dispassionate study of the Bible shows that Shem was a tribe of grifters and flim-flammers. Even Abraham, pimped his wife, Sarah to both the King of Egypt and the King of Philistine by passing her off as his sister. Both kings then had to pay huge extortion fees to get him to take her back after “the Lord” became “wroth.” And Isaac tried the same thing with Rebecca but got busted by the King of Philistine.

    Assuming any Christians still want to be related to Mac Daddy, then there is a school of thought that, to fulfill God’s promise to Abraham to make him the father of all nations,” he had to father offspring on each race of women. Sarah was a Semite, Hagar was a Hamite, so it makes sense that Keturah was a Japhethite. Abraham took a wife by the name of Keturah by whom he had six sons. Four of them settled the Arabian peninsula and are known as the “pure” Arabs. But two of them migrated to southern Europe.

    The upshot of Noah’s prophecy was that Ham became the progenitor of craftsmen and artisans, And Shem (whose name again means “the source”) became the progenitors of priests and scribes. But Japheth became the father of kings and warriors.

    Japheth (whose name means fair), not Shem, is the father of Europe whose territory was given to him by Noah. He was a great man of mighty deeds and was worshipped as a god in Europe (Jupiter) and in India (pra-Japati).

    Why any White Nationalist, Christian or otherwise, would prefer to shuck such a glorious heritage in favor of some tenuous connection to Mac Daddy … er …. “Father” Abraham is beyond me.


  9. clytemnestra57
    December 23, 2014


    I’m not the first to express this sentiment – thracy was right in his previous article here, the most important conflicts are those between White groups. It’s the White traitors – the White globalists – the White philo-semites – they are the real problem. If it wasn’t for them, dealing with hostile Jews and other hostile non-Whites would be pretty straightforward.

    He’s absolutely right. Our problem is not with the Jews or any other race, but the White race traitors who collaborate with them. The biggest problem of the White race is how individualistic it is. There is no collectivism or unity that would enforce the necessary penalties on renegade Whites.

    With Blacks, “Snitches Get Stitches.” I suspect the same policy is in place with Mestizos. Asians shun their renegades. Jews used to execute renegade Jews, but now they shun them. I read this article about this ultra-Orthodox Jewish renegades who were ultimately shunned by their own children for leaving the sect even for another Jewish sect. One of these renegades; a woman, committed suicide.

    White race traitors get rich. Not only is the Anti-White system heavily incentivized and they leave office as multi-millionaires, but they have schools and post offices and presidential libraries named after them. Not to mention secret service protection for life.

    White renegades even get great press. RINO Republican John McCain wasn’t purged from the Republican Party. They called him a “Maverick” and ran him for presidential office!

    Until WNs can implement a system where our renegades face adversely dire consequences to their collaborating with our enemies, we will always have this problem.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s


This entry was posted on December 21, 2014 by and tagged .
%d bloggers like this: