Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

White Minus Plenty

If the goal is the 14 Words – “we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children” – what are the non-goals?

Aside from MindWeapons and luminaries like Kevin MacDonald, the other poster that had perhaps the most significant impact on me intellectually went by the handle “Neo-Nietzsche.” He was once an actual Neo-Nazi, but had matured into a promoter of Nietzsche. One of the most intelligent online commenters I ever came across, he was a rabid opponent of “slave morality.” Anytime a Christian, or a conservative, would slip into slave morality he would immediately clarify the situation. One of his favorite lines was, “who do you want to sacrifice on your altar first?”

circular-firing-squad

He was an implacable foe of what I would call “process-ism” and he called arguments over “form-of-government.” Many whites believe that some structural change, some change of rules, would prevent anti-whites from harming us, that we could come up with some “racially neutral” system that would protect white interests.

He also memorably took to task the moralizers, once memorably pointing out that while Israeli brothels and sex trafficking might scandalize you, your moral outrage won’t win any battles. Whoever has the power decides what is “moral.”

So, who do you want to sacrifice on your altar first?

For a lot of people, sex is the place to start the sacrifices. Homosexuals, of course, go on first. The God of Israel declared homosexuals to be an “abomination” and they don’t have children anyway. Those creepy people into “bondage” or something, of course, go on next, along with any woman who may have read a “rape-y” sort of bodice ripper – surely only a horrible sexual degenerate would be into such things!

Men seem to line up to want to sacrifice the “sluts” – a category that includes promiscuous white women, or those who dress skimpy, or really any woman having sex with someone other than the man complaining. Women often want to sacrifice “misogynists,” “porn addicts” and “pick up artists” – all “jew-ed.” Presumably, we’re all supposed to go back to Catholic morality – no sex of any kind except for missionary position that leads to pregnancy, in marriage of course.

Well, then people sort off back of a bit. I mean, no need to be *that* strict, right?

Of course, we want “real men” – not girly men. More coal miners, less opera fans. Any man who likes opera must be a fag, whether or not he actually has sex with other men. Feminists, surely, are honorary lesbians – up on the altar they go. Same with any woman having an abortion – unless they were raped by a non-white, that is.

As the sexual rules get stricter and stricter, the exceptions get broader and broader, of course.

PunchingYourself

Who else goes on the altar? Well “liberals” of course. If you aren’t a subscriber to Austrian Economics and advocate a return to the gold standard – onto the altar you go. Capitalism is the only way.

Well, wait, what about National Socialism? Working class whites are the majority, in fact, it’s the rich Republicans that want cheap, non-white labor.

Hmm, guess this one is more complicated than we thought.

Now, of course, we can all agree that we must return to traditional Christianity. Oh, but wait, Christianity is a Jewish invention. We must return to European paganism. No, but real Christianity is Christian Identity – Europeans are the True Jews. Hmm. Maybe we should just start our own religion, then we can stick both the Christians and the Pagans on the altar.

Who’s next? Well, clearly no True White would listen to (c)Rap music. One famous Scandanavian White Nationalist once said that Black Metal was the true European music, but later decided that metal, and rock in general, was too influenced by African music. So, all guitar music is out, classical symphonies only.

It goes on. Nordics vs. Meds. Are brown eyed people truly Aryan? Greeks and southern Italians? Spaniards?

At what point does it turn into a circular firing squad?

Advertisements

22 comments on “White Minus Plenty

  1. Hipster Racist
    October 29, 2014

    Reblogged this on Hipster Racist and commented:

    Who do you want to sacrifice on your altar first?

    Like

  2. icareviews
    October 29, 2014

    As long as the circular firing squad doesn’t shoot the white nationalists who think this is rad:

    Like

  3. icareviews
    October 29, 2014

    Reblogged this on icareviews and commented:

    Hipster Racist reprieves a circle jerk of condemned men.

    Like

  4. Matthew
    October 30, 2014

    Completely the wrong question, but I presume that’s the point.

    I don’t wish to sacrifice anyone. There are groups I will die to save, and there are groups for which I will not raise a finger.

    Who is mine?

    These are the 3 words.

    Like

    • Matthew
      October 30, 2014

      To understand the word “mine”, you must first reflect on the various meanings: My boot, my dog, my children, my wife, my God.

      Like

      • Hipster Racist
        October 30, 2014

        “Ours” is a network of “mine’s.”

        Your sister – the daughter of your mother and father – decides at some point to be a “lesbian” and a Negro rapes her because she is a “white bitch dyke.”

        Is she “ours” – is she “yours?”

        You know the answer, but you won’t say it.

        Like

      • Matthew
        October 31, 2014

        One of my sisters is a slut who made clear that she would try to influence my children. I do not allow her in my house or to have unmonitored access to my children. She does not speak to me anymore.

        And yet she is mine. She would deny it. My parents don’t understand it. You understand, but think I’m fighting you.

        Any nigger who rapes one of my sisters is getting a bullet if I can’t give him the rope. Nigger rapes one of my female cousins? I’ll be in the lynching party, if her brothers have the stones. White girl in my part of Texas? Depends. Was she burnin’ the coal?

        Like

      • Matthew
        October 31, 2014

        Think global. Lynch local.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        October 31, 2014

        @Matthew

        Here’s my newest analogy.

        Fast food is bad for you. It is in the interest of white people to not promote eating McDonald’s. It is likely ethical for a WN blog to refuse ads from McDonald’s.

        But it would be counter-productive to declare that “no true WN would ever eat at McDonald’s” and demand that all WNs strictly eat a healthy diet.

        I think this analogy may work for vice in general. We shouldn’t promote promiscuity. But it’s pointless to exclude sluts from the WN community.

        Does that make sense?

        Like

      • Matthew
        October 31, 2014

        Hipster, I can’t even tell if we’re arguing at this point. I exclude my sister from my home because she was actively toxic, not because of her promiscuity.

        My other sister also has an increasing knob count, but she’s not proud of it, not toxic. She’s not talking to me anymore either, but that’s only because I told her she should give up on ever finding a husband and come live as a part of my household.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        November 2, 2014

        @matthew

        This is where we might be talking past each other.

        When I say “white plus nothing” I most emphatically do NOT mean in your *personal life* – I simply and only mean that our public white advocacy has no reason to exclude any white person unless they are anti-white.

        There are all sorts of reasons to exclude people in your personal life having nothing to do with being white – of course. There are all sorts of white people I would never associate with.

        Even an exclusively white Christian church is of course going to exclude all sorts of white people based on religious reasons, and as far as I am concerned, they have every right to do so and I wouldn’t dream of telling them otherwise. Various fraternities and sororities will always be exclusively male or female, and I wouldn’t dream of complaining about it.

        If an Italian family didn’t want their daughter marrying a Spaniard – I certainly wouldn’t stick my nose in that, even though I consider both white. If a Nordic family only wanted their son to marry a Nordic woman, I have not the slightest objection. If a Mormon family will only marry into another Mormon family, you will have no complaints from me.

        A pro-white Christian church preaching against gays and sluts – no problem. But the Association for the Advancement of White People – if such a thing existed – should be a big tent.

        Like

      • Matthew
        November 4, 2014

        Hipster,

        The heuristic for exclusion from a society ought to be betrayal of that society. Coalburners do not belong to the white order. Sure proof of coalburning, a non-white child, is an obvious ground for exclusion. Even if the child is dead, or abandoned, telegony tells us that the woman is forever unclean.

        Beyond that, if two men (in good standing with the Society) testify that a woman burned the coal, she’s not welcome.

        Beyond that, every society has a place (if not a need) for whores and concubines. If she’s diseased; a whore. If she can bear clean white children; a concubine.

        I get first pick on concubines, obviously.

        Like

    • Hipster Racist
      October 30, 2014

      A Pakistani commits “correctional rape” against a White lesbian woman.

      Is she “ours?”

      Like

      • Matthew
        October 30, 2014

        “Ours” is a network of “mine”s.

        Like

  5. clytemnestra57
    October 31, 2014

    @hipsterracist:

    A Pakistani commits “correctional rape” against a White lesbian woman.

    Is she “ours?”

    She is “ours.” That’s a big factor which played into why the Pakistani rapist did the deed.

    The big question that needs to be asked of the White lesbian and gay community is do they understand that they are “ours?” Or are they going to continue to ally themselves with those who are not “ours”, simply because both are hostile to fundamental Christian churches?

    IMO, it would be a lot easier for a conservative-leaning (religious or not) Pro-White community to defend White lesbians from “correctional rape” from Pakistanis if White lesbians stopped clamoring to force Christian ministers to marry them and Christian bakeries to bake their wedding cakes.

    A major Aryan trait is the belief in xenos. Invited guests are treated with great courtesy and are expected to return the favor. Unless they are bent on conquest, Aryans don’t historically intrude themselves or their lifestyles on people who don’t want to associate with them.

    I really don’t want to exclude gays from the White community, because they are doing great work by reclaiming the cities to be resettled by the Whites who built them, but they need to stop treating their sexual orientation like it is a religion of its own instead of a personal preference which should remain a private issue.

    I don’t care who you have sex with as long as it is a consenting adult; I just don’t want to hear the hairy details.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      October 31, 2014

      Or are they going to continue to ally themselves with those who are not “ours”, simply because both are hostile to fundamental Christian churches?

      Well, that’s the thing. There is no question that the post-60s “Gay Liberation” or LGBT movement was run by Jews, and was generally hostile to White interests. But for every gay and lesbian anti-white, there are at least 10 straight anti-whites.

      So, from a WN perspective, it’s the anti-whiteness that is objectionable, not the gayness itself. So, at least in theory, it’s possible to be pro-gay and pro-white. Plus, in fact, much of the LGBT community – not that different than the feminist community – is very “implicitly white.” Hence, the #solidarityisforwhitewomen thing, or Melissa Ethridge (or whichever) being attacked as “racist” for holding a big lesbian party on a former slave plantation.

      If we reject the gays and lesbians, while Jews make a place for them in the anti-white coalition, well of course they are going to join the anti-white coalition.

      So, attacking gays *as gays* is counter productive. Posting lurid pictures of gay pride parades – demonizing gays *as gays* is counter productive.

      In theory, at least, it is possible for gays to be anti-Christian but pro-white. There are plenty of straight WNs that are anti-Christian but nevertheless pro-white.

      So, to me, bashing queers *as queers* is counter-productive, and giving them a space to be pro-white is good strategy. I would make the same argument for most “sex issues.” The DailyStormer attacking women that read 50 Shades of Grey, or attacking “sluts” in general, is counter-productive.

      After I wrote the first part of my novel, one of the BUGsters nominated me the leader of the “Slut Faction” of White Nationalism. I accept that role. It’s possible to be pro-slut but nevertheless pro-white.

      I’ll even admit that being anti-feminist is likely bad WN strategy in the grand scheme of things. In fact, my opinion on that may be “evolving” as well. Probably has to do with the fact I’m essentially settled down now with a woman that is, for all intents and purposes, an utterly sexist female supremacist (but nevertheless a total sub 🙂 When I asked her her opinion about women in the military, she thought it was the dumbest idea ever and couldn’t imagine why any woman would want to be in something so utterly male as the military. She essentially thinks that men are farm animals – you feed them, house them, and they do useful work for you. She even admitted that she cooks for me so I’ll have enough energy to life heavy things for her.

      In fact, when I realize how she treats me not particularly different than she treats the farm animals … ok fine, I admit it. I’ve been domesticated. It’s rather pleasant honestly.

      they need to stop treating their sexual orientation like it is a religion of its own instead of a personal preference which should remain a private issue.

      This is very close to Kevin MacDonald’s view, and James O’Meara (a WN who is almost certainly homosexual) who is completely opposed to “gay” “marriage.”

      Like

      • clytemnestra57
        January 12, 2015

        Hope you see this addendum of mine, HR.

        I’m addressing two factors of your hypothetical scenario where a Pakistani Muslim performs a “correctional rape” on a White lesbian and how White gays align themselves with those who are “not ours,” because of their own hostility to Christian fundamentalism.

        First, even if the Pakistani Muslim’s motive for the “correctional rape” of a White lesbian stems strictly from his own sense of outraged morality and religious duty, he is overstepping his bounds and he KNOWS this, because it is YOUR responsibility to do so, because she is YOURS. If your own sense of personal aesthetics makes raping a chubby, mannish looking White woman a turn off and you do not do so, it’s still not his place to assume the responsibility because she is not HIS.

        Erego, the logical position of White men from a WN POV is that “WE determine how lax we want to be with OUR women, not YOU and if you overstep your bounds, you will be the guest of honor at a necktie party.”

        The next issue again stems back to that ancient European custom of “Xenos” Just as courtesy is only extended to INVITED guests, it violates xenos to intrude yourself where you are not welcome. Gays need to understand that intruding themselves on fundamentalist Christians violates the spirit of xenos and refrain from doing so. It is not like there are no Christian churches that accept gays. It is not like they cannot start their own sects which rationalize away any prohibition against homosexuality.

        This pushy, intrusive in-your-face aspect of gay “rights” is not Aryan in spirit; it is entirely alien and needs to stop. If you’re gay, it’s your sexual orientation, not the whole sum of you. It’s time for “the love that dare not say its name” to be quiet. You’re here, you’re queer. We know that. The vast majority of us don’t care. Be queer and be quiet. We don’t need to hear the hairy details.

        Like

      • Hipster Racist
        January 12, 2015

        @Cly

        Honestly, I just don’t want AryanSkynet to devolve into The Daily Stormer. I have a bad feeling that people don’t realize that Daily Stormer is a *satire* – it comes from the old website “4chan/pol.” Those guys posting pictures of gay pride parades and raging about homos – they are quite likely teenage boys and the whole thing is one big joke. That we have serious Catholics that read that stuff and think “yeah, down with the homos” – again, I’m not sure what to say. Don’t feed the trolls?

        Gays are only an issue if you make them an issue. Of course, some conservative Christians being forced to make lesbian wedding cakes is an outrage and a clear violation of the freedom of religion. But I went and had Chic-fil-a during that boycott not to make a point, but because those Christians make a damn fine chicken sandwich.

        Let’s try this experiment: let’s not talk about gays at all. You’d be surprised how little of a problem they become. We’re talking about, what, 2% of the population? They are simply being weaponized against us, but really that era is pretty much over now. No one is shocked at dudes parading down the streets in their underwear. Been there, done that, it barely even scandalizes blue haired church ladies anymore.

        In fact, WN 2.0 can easily just co-opt the gays back to the white side.

        Like

  6. Cj aka Elderofzyklons Blog
    November 10, 2014

    Reblogged this on ElderofZyklon's Blog!.

    Like

  7. Pingback: The Boys Of Summer | Aryan Skynet

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on October 29, 2014 by and tagged , , , , , .
%d bloggers like this: