Aryan Skynet

Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch

White Plus Nothing

A few years ago, the atheist movement in America was in the middle of a conflict. Roughly, one side simply wanted to promote atheism, the lack of belief in gods, while the other side wanted to promote what they called “Atheism Plus” which was about “promoting social justice and countering misogyny, racism, homo/bi/transphobia, ableism and other such bigotry inside and outside of the atheist community.”

The Atheism Plus faction had a rationale. According to them, racism, sexism, rape culture, and homophobia all had their roots in theism and religion. However there were plenty of atheists that wanted lower taxes, limited government, a libertarian economic policy, and rejected feminism. They argued that the political issues of the “Social Justice Warriors” had nothing to do with the lack of belief in god and were irrelevant to atheism.
Banner_Aplus2

We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and a return to the gold standard.

One of the brilliant things about the 14 Words is their simplicity. They merely state that white people should exist, now and in the future, and that white people should pro-actively make sure we exist, now and in the future.

But of course, no one could leave well enough alone. A piece of White Knightery was added: “because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.” Uncontroversial for the most part, and what you’d expect from a pro-white movement, but now the focus is not just the goal: white people existing now and in the future. Now, it’s a reason: because white women are beautiful.

One presumes that if some twist of evolution turns white women homely, we no longer have the need to exist now and in the future?

Matt Parrott once famously said, some of his favorite people are ugly and stupid. If my sister didn’t happen to be beautiful, she would still be my sister. If my son didn’t happen to be clever, he’d still be my son. The reason we must secure the existence of our people is not necessarily because they are smart and beautiful – it is because they are ours.

Even the author of the 14 Words, David Lane, couldn’t leave well enough alone. He later penned his “88 precepts” which is where the tagline 14/88 comes from (it has nothing to do with “Heil Hitler,” this seems to be an invention of the ADL and $PLC types.) In my opinion, and the opinion of some other pro-whites, the 88 Precepts have little to recommend them. What is good in the 88 Precepts is not unique to them, and what is unique to them is not good.

While the 14 Words state a simple goal, the 88 Precepts state a more comprehensive ideology that doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. It is likely not coincidental that David Lane failed to spark a White revolution and merely set a pro-white movement back a generation and wound up dying in federal prison.

We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and restore the US Constitution.

One of the most powerful Christian groups in America is called “The Fellowship” and they put on a signature political event, the Washington Prayer Breakfast, every year. The Fellowship was started by a number of businessmen who believed promoting fundamentalist Christianity would blunt the appeal of unionization which they saw as a threat to their businesses. Under leader Doug Coe, the Family embraced an ideology of “Jesus Plus Nothing.” Going further than the Protestants before them, they even stopped using the term “Christian” altogether. “Jesus Plus Nothing” was the widest tent, to be one of the Fellowship, you simply had to accept Jesus, and nothing else.
14Words

We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and return to traditional Christianity.

The 14 Words can be embraced by all white people, and even acknowledged as legitimate by all non-white people. Its simplicity allows for everyone to accept the goal, the most natural goal in the world, the existence of your people. While white people can agree to disagree on many, many things, from religion, to politics, to culture, everyone can agree that we must exist, now and in the future. In many ways, that is all we have to agree on.

We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and show the world Hitler was right!

It’s a sign of intelligence to be able to argue in favor of an opposing view. It’s considered ethical to argue the opposing position with the Principle of Charity, “interpreting a speaker’s statements to be rational and, in the case of any argument, considering its best, strongest possible interpretation.” If you’re a libertarian free market capitalist, can you make a plausible case for fiat money and Keynesianism? If you’re a Christian, can you make a plausible case for paganism? If you are a sexual conservative, can you make a plausible case for hedonism? If you’re a sexist, can you make a plausible case for feminism or male chauvinism?

If you are so convinced of your own ideologies that you are blinded to the possible benefits of the opposing side, you’re a fanatic.

We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and ban porn!

Mao famously said, let a thousand flowers bloom. It’s easy for everyone to agree on the 14 Words. If you can’t agree that white people should exist, now and in the future, you can’t be called pro-white or an advocate for whites. But in order to be pro-white, you don’t need to agree on much beyond that. As much as I rail against feminism, for example, I’ve also argued that a pro-white feminism can exist and even have positive aspects. I’ve argued pro-whiteness from the perspective of Christianity, paganism, and strict materialist atheism. I’ve argued that whites can exist – now and in the future – not just in isolated rural compounds, but even in multi-racial, multi-cultural international cities.

We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and end feminism forever!

White people are a global minority and our population is not growing quickly, if at all. It makes sense for pro-whites to have a “big tent” approach. We should welcome all whites who are not anti-white. Any white who wants white people to exist, now and in the future, should be welcomed. We can expect disagreements – even strenuous disagreements – on the particulars.

But the simplicity of the 14 Words – “we must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children” – provides us with the core assertion of white interests, something that we can all agree on. Embracing the 14 Words as the goal, we can make the tent as big as possible. To get in the tent, really all you need is to embrace the 14 Words as a goal. What else is necessary? What else is a requirement? Any time you are tempted to add more requirements to white advocacy, just remember the Three Words:

“White Plus Nothing.”

Advertisements

15 comments on “White Plus Nothing

  1. Hipster Racist
    October 27, 2014

    Reblogged this on Hipster Racist and commented:

    The Big Tent: White Plus Nothing.

    Like

  2. Cj aka Elderofzyklons Blog
    October 27, 2014

    Reblogged this on ElderofZyklon's Blog!.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. vikingbitch
    October 28, 2014

    Reblogged this on vikingbitch's Blog and commented:
    I am only in this movement for my kids. Yes I promote the Working White Female side, but I view my blog, my stance as just a tributary leading into the Bigger Wellspring, that being A White Homeland.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. icareviews
    October 28, 2014

    Reblogged this on icareviews and commented:

    Hipster Racist pitches a big tent.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. clytemnestra57
    October 28, 2014

    I read Hunter Wallace’s blog at Occidental Dissent about White Nationalism being nothing but beefs which was duly re-blogged at $PLC “Hate” Watch. He could have simplified it by saying that White Nationalism suffered from Big Man Syndrome or too many activists being all about wanting to be “Chiefs” with not enough “Indians” backing them.

    I like the White Plus Nothing or Fourteen Words Only Concept. It allows the multiplicity of approaches that icareviews alluded to when I raised my own issues with HAC’s Pacific NW PLE theory. I haven’t changed my opinion, but I don’t want to go to war with HAC or any of his supporters over what may be workable due to variables I had not factored in.

    The basic thing is that WN is too inflexible and that is one luxury we can’t afford right now if we want to incorporate the fourteen words. There are a lot of creative people out there who can think outside the box; they should be encouraged not chased off.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      October 29, 2014

      Cly,

      A couple of things. Male ego and posturing, the fact that it’s an online movement means trolls are inevitable, the fact that controversial movements attract nutjobs, and – although I hesitate to say it – anti-Whites – especially our kosher friends – love nothing more than to start infighting.

      Like

  6. Just sayin'
    October 30, 2014

    Mostly agree. But in reality, it’s not that simple.

    Need to agree on who is white and who is not white.

    Specifically, need to agree that Jews are not white.

    Otherwise the 14 words can and will be perverted.

    There are people right now who promote the idea that Jews are white. If whites ever regain any power this will increase.

    Like

    • Hipster Racist
      October 30, 2014

      There are people right now who promote the idea that Jews are white.

      Who are these people?

      From what I can tell, Jews most certainly do NOT want to be considered White.

      I mean, they even write songs about how they are totally not white.

      Like

      • Just sayin'
        October 30, 2014

        Jared Taylor

        http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/intelligence-files/profiles/jared-taylor

        “One thing that separates Taylor from much of the radical right, however, is his lack of anti-Semitism; he told MSNBC-TV interviewer Phil Donahue in 2003 that Jews “are fine by me” and “look white to me.”

        I’ve also seen some neo-reactionaries pushing the idea that Jews are white.

        One reason that Jewish parasitism is so effective is that Jews can be white when it suits their purposes and non-white when it suits their purposes. Nowadays, it typically better to avoid being labeled white. But if that changes, Jews will change their strategy.

        We need to be clear about who is us and who is not us.

        Like

    • Hipster Racist
      October 30, 2014

      Really? You linked to the $PLC?

      Who care what they think? It’s some off-shore jew hedge fund?

      Whaaat?

      Like

    • Hipster Racist
      October 31, 2014

      @Just sayin’

      I don’t consider Jews to be White, and the $PLC would almost certainly consider me an “anti-semite.” No one can accuse me of being “soft” on the Jewish problem.

      AFAIK, there are no writers on AryanSkynet that are soft of the Jewish Problem as well.

      Jared Taylor, in my opinion, is probably playing “judo” with Jews. You always give your enemy a way to retreat.

      You will find no philo-semitism on AryanSkynet. This most certainly is not AmRen.

      Like

      • Just Sayin'
        November 1, 2014

        I wasn’t accusing you of anything, I was just critiquing the idea of white plus nothing.

        Although I mostly agree with it.

        Like

  7. Pingback: The Boys Of Summer | Aryan Skynet

Leave a Reply - Your Comment WILL be Moderated.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: