Once Aryan Skynet Goes Live It Doesn't Matter Who Pulled The Switch
A few years ago, the atheist movement in America was in the middle of a conflict. Roughly, one side simply wanted to promote atheism, the lack of belief in gods, while the other side wanted to promote what they called “Atheism Plus” which was about “promoting social justice and countering misogyny, racism, homo/bi/transphobia, ableism and other such bigotry inside and outside of the atheist community.”
The Atheism Plus faction had a rationale. According to them, racism, sexism, rape culture, and homophobia all had their roots in theism and religion. However there were plenty of atheists that wanted lower taxes, limited government, a libertarian economic policy, and rejected feminism. They argued that the political issues of the “Social Justice Warriors” had nothing to do with the lack of belief in god and were irrelevant to atheism.
We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and a return to the gold standard.
One of the brilliant things about the 14 Words is their simplicity. They merely state that white people should exist, now and in the future, and that white people should pro-actively make sure we exist, now and in the future.
But of course, no one could leave well enough alone. A piece of White Knightery was added: “because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth.” Uncontroversial for the most part, and what you’d expect from a pro-white movement, but now the focus is not just the goal: white people existing now and in the future. Now, it’s a reason: because white women are beautiful.
One presumes that if some twist of evolution turns white women homely, we no longer have the need to exist now and in the future?
Matt Parrott once famously said, some of his favorite people are ugly and stupid. If my sister didn’t happen to be beautiful, she would still be my sister. If my son didn’t happen to be clever, he’d still be my son. The reason we must secure the existence of our people is not necessarily because they are smart and beautiful – it is because they are ours.
Even the author of the 14 Words, David Lane, couldn’t leave well enough alone. He later penned his “88 precepts” which is where the tagline 14/88 comes from (it has nothing to do with “Heil Hitler,” this seems to be an invention of the ADL and $PLC types.) In my opinion, and the opinion of some other pro-whites, the 88 Precepts have little to recommend them. What is good in the 88 Precepts is not unique to them, and what is unique to them is not good.
While the 14 Words state a simple goal, the 88 Precepts state a more comprehensive ideology that doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. It is likely not coincidental that David Lane failed to spark a White revolution and merely set a pro-white movement back a generation and wound up dying in federal prison.
We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and restore the US Constitution.
One of the most powerful Christian groups in America is called “The Fellowship” and they put on a signature political event, the Washington Prayer Breakfast, every year. The Fellowship was started by a number of businessmen who believed promoting fundamentalist Christianity would blunt the appeal of unionization which they saw as a threat to their businesses. Under leader Doug Coe, the Family embraced an ideology of “Jesus Plus Nothing.” Going further than the Protestants before them, they even stopped using the term “Christian” altogether. “Jesus Plus Nothing” was the widest tent, to be one of the Fellowship, you simply had to accept Jesus, and nothing else.
We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and return to traditional Christianity.
The 14 Words can be embraced by all white people, and even acknowledged as legitimate by all non-white people. Its simplicity allows for everyone to accept the goal, the most natural goal in the world, the existence of your people. While white people can agree to disagree on many, many things, from religion, to politics, to culture, everyone can agree that we must exist, now and in the future. In many ways, that is all we have to agree on.
We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and show the world Hitler was right!
It’s a sign of intelligence to be able to argue in favor of an opposing view. It’s considered ethical to argue the opposing position with the Principle of Charity, “interpreting a speaker’s statements to be rational and, in the case of any argument, considering its best, strongest possible interpretation.” If you’re a libertarian free market capitalist, can you make a plausible case for fiat money and Keynesianism? If you’re a Christian, can you make a plausible case for paganism? If you are a sexual conservative, can you make a plausible case for hedonism? If you’re a sexist, can you make a plausible case for feminism or male chauvinism?
If you are so convinced of your own ideologies that you are blinded to the possible benefits of the opposing side, you’re a fanatic.
We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and ban porn!
Mao famously said, let a thousand flowers bloom. It’s easy for everyone to agree on the 14 Words. If you can’t agree that white people should exist, now and in the future, you can’t be called pro-white or an advocate for whites. But in order to be pro-white, you don’t need to agree on much beyond that. As much as I rail against feminism, for example, I’ve also argued that a pro-white feminism can exist and even have positive aspects. I’ve argued pro-whiteness from the perspective of Christianity, paganism, and strict materialist atheism. I’ve argued that whites can exist – now and in the future – not just in isolated rural compounds, but even in multi-racial, multi-cultural international cities.
We must secure the existence of our people, a future for White children, and end feminism forever!
White people are a global minority and our population is not growing quickly, if at all. It makes sense for pro-whites to have a “big tent” approach. We should welcome all whites who are not anti-white. Any white who wants white people to exist, now and in the future, should be welcomed. We can expect disagreements – even strenuous disagreements – on the particulars.
But the simplicity of the 14 Words – “we must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children” – provides us with the core assertion of white interests, something that we can all agree on. Embracing the 14 Words as the goal, we can make the tent as big as possible. To get in the tent, really all you need is to embrace the 14 Words as a goal. What else is necessary? What else is a requirement? Any time you are tempted to add more requirements to white advocacy, just remember the Three Words:
“White Plus Nothing.”